Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:17:33 -0500 From: Diane Bruce <db@db.net> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why BSDs got no love Message-ID: <20091223131733.GA34302@night.db.net> In-Reply-To: <20091223032410.GA25393@comcast.net> References: <541b7a870912150733m4bc34148j98790a6142d4521c@mail.gmail.com> <20091223032410.GA25393@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:24:10PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 15 Dec 2009 at 07:33:49 PST Jan Husar wrote: > >http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1123&tag=nl.e011 > > Others have pointed out that PC-BSD meets the need expressed in this > article. I believe this is because of a common misconception of what FreeBSD is. In essence FreeBSD would be the equivalent of the Linux kernel, except we have a userland integrated. No one would claim that the Linux kernel was a 'distro' that needed a GUI installer, yet some think that of FreeBSD. > > As for FreeBSD itself, the question must be asked: do we WANT to get > more love from people who judge an OS by whether or not it has a > graphical installer? No, but it would be great if there were some offerings in ports for those who wished to roll their own 'distro' ;-). -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091223131733.GA34302>