Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 May 2019 12:11:41 +0200
From:      Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>
To:        "Bapat, Udayan" <Udayan.Bapat@netapp.com>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BSD11 vs BSD12 KVM performance
Message-ID:  <b83b1234-6359-2b26-d9ce-9eb261861eda@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <D2BA45B3-5156-424F-A74A-C41FE0E20CEC@netapp.com>
References:  <D2BA45B3-5156-424F-A74A-C41FE0E20CEC@netapp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 02.05.2019 um 20:51 schrieb Bapat, Udayan:
> Hi All,
>
> I work in performance team with NetApp, Inc.
>
> During qualification process of BSD11 as a guest, we observed that the cost of rdtsc call has magnified by 10x compared to BSD10. We are using qemu-2.10 that came as a default package in RH7.4. It appears that BSD11 was released before qemu-2.10 so I am not sure if we have any supportability issue and I would need to upgrade QEMU version.  In what way, I can do more debugging around this? We are also experimenting with ESX and we didn’t see this issue there. I also could not find any performance benchmarking around BSD+QEMU/KVM.

Hello, please clarify whether it is about FreeBSD-10 vs. FreeBSD-11, 
like the body tells, or FreeBSD-11 vs. FreeBSD-12, like the topic tells.
Can't help in any case regading the QMEU question, unfortunately.

-harry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b83b1234-6359-2b26-d9ce-9eb261861eda>