Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 May 2014 17:45:25 -0600
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Winston Smith <smith.winston.101@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: USB isochronous traffic with Rasberry Pi [WAS: Re: USB audio device on Raspberry Pi]
Message-ID:  <1399938325.50937.6.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CADH-AwHmj%2BUYxfNX5NkfdNNZB4EWtLpwp9mq8_5z8z9WLLhvCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140425154430.GA76168@utility-01.thismonkey.com> <CAGW5k5bZ_bTQUXuzNm=tbwx3npz1_HoOR3vM8TBRVFs8zWCq-w@mail.gmail.com> <5362638B.1080104@selasky.org> <5363C133.2000304@selasky.org> <53677CB8.5000800@selasky.org> <CAJ-Vmo=XmH-RX6_i13NuAXhq-jTC%2BWedGiyOMJaPO4r014DSgw@mail.gmail.com> <1399303695.22079.239.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1399304157.22079.243.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-Vmok-%2B7%2Bcq%2BDa6_C2AA7BuP5readY_Gfwwm_RF5kh4VerQA@mail.gmail.com> <5368A93D.3070608@selasky.org> <5368AC03.8080401@selasky.org> <536CE5E9.8020408@selasky.org> <1399647986.22079.367.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <536D0575.1040407@selasky.org> <1399661378.22079.376.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <536DDA6D.7060101@selasky.org> <536E2EBB.7030104@selasky.org> <1399742062.22079.403.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <536EA597.3070700@selasky.org> <536EA753.40905@selasky.org> <1399764190.22079.425.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <536F17A1.8060807@selasky.org> <1399899978.22079.436.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CADH-AwHmj%2BUYxfNX5NkfdNNZB4EWtLpwp9mq8_5z8z9WLLhvCQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 19:24 -0400, Winston Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Committed as r265913; thanks for tracking this down!
> 
> I think I lost track of this in the email thread, but:
> 
> 1) Was this the cause of the stalls Tim described on the BBB?

I don't think so.  

> 2) What's the criteria for this to be MFC'd back to 10-STABLE?

Catching up with MFCs would be the main thing, and I'm getting started
on that today.  A few things here and there have been merged recently,
but in general the arm tree was last sync'd 11->10 in a big way in
mid-December.

It's a little harder to keep arm stable branches in sync because on
-current we've had so much instability for so long that it's a bit scary
to MFC a change a few days or even a couple weeks after it goes into
head, when you know that change is at best a small piece of fixing the
overall stability and might actually de-stabilize the 10-stable branch.

I think all that is calming down and things are in pretty good shape on
-current right now, so it seems like a good time to get several months
worth of work merged to 10-stable all at once (meaning over the next few
days, as close as I can get to "at once" and still do some testing along
the way).

-- Ian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1399938325.50937.6.camel>