Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Nov 2020 06:28:47 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 251126] Resurrect databases/py-rrdtool_lgpl
Message-ID:  <bug-251126-7788-GFzusywPLi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-251126-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-251126-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251126

--- Comment #4 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> ---
After looking at it a bit longer, I'm not sure if it's right to revive a po=
rt
in this case. The new port comes from completely different sources, but has=
 the
same function.

Also, I think that in case of a new port a naming scheme like py-python-rrd=
tool
or maybe py-rrdtool would be more appropriate.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251126-7788-GFzusywPLi>