From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Aug 19 20:10:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA08831
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (cisco-ts9-line4.uoregon.edu [128.223.150.85])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA08826
          for <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA00399; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
To: Jake Dias <jake@pcug.co.uk>
cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: IBCS2
In-Reply-To: <E0usTKd-0005BZ-00@june.pcug.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960819200939.337C-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Jake Dias wrote:

> Are there two ibcs2 emulators in -current?

Nope.  It's two ways to do the same thing.

> ie the built in one "options IBCS2"
> And the lkm one which can be loaded by running  "ibcs2"
> 
> Both cannot be used simultaneously.  I get "multiply defined" error messages
> 
> Which is better?  If one is better shouldn't the other one be removed?

Personal preference.  I personally prefer to bloat the kernel and compile
them in, since I haven't had the best of luck with LKMs and I have *pleny*
of memory.  :)

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major