Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:44:27 -0400
From:      Corey Smith <csmith@bonddesk.com>
To:        G Bryant <gbryant@roamingsolutions.net>
Cc:        daniel@dgnetwork.com.br, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, FreeBSD <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Load Balancing Outgoing, its possible ?
Message-ID:  <1130514267.81705.101.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <43624181.5010305@roamingsolutions.net>
References:  <4361FE7E.50607@dgnetwork.com.br> <43624181.5010305@roamingsolutions.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
> Daniel Dias Gon=E7alves wrote:
>=20
> >
> > It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some=20
> > software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
> > This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the=20
> > user of NAT or IP valid ?
> > If it is possible, wanted to see examples with rules.
> >

It would be much better to do per flow load balancing then per packet.
With per packet your TCP flows will arrive out of order which is a bad
situation since it will lead to a large number of retransmissions and
zero-window acknowledgments.

The only tunable to help correct that is to allow selective
acknowledgments.

You are going to get much higher utilization on your load balanced lines
by using per flow with multiple TCP connections.

Anybody know how to implement per flow load balancing in FreeBSD?  Are
multiple default routes supported?

It would be beautiful if you could put multiple routes with the same
metric into the kernel and then the kernel would enable per flow load
balancing of the routes...

-Corey Smith



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1130514267.81705.101.camel>