From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 17:42:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613B106566B for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694288FC22 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so9036138wyb.13 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Pc5X0DH8+5GV6ahLCpzjXS5JdVW93AMWZXi+Cd4Nn8Q=; b=LnLgrC/It/2zAembJtV9ssEgJ/w6bXJo8yMf/RU4CmLLzn/0NwxoZvwsJIgoGaDDT8 HJkaHav8zwGDdeoWci7JNNTpqGsxnyMHixypQLxkDVQXhsXATcOw3KTkwdAO04RVkZiE RUWb3KVaNotufo1xMvQ1FdgU4IdaBxMBfiNEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VhQAXgUtFTqB9heG8vYWAbWhJhkGFm+/LblqzbhyccC+ayrrWufNBpjZL449DsL0Kp 7UYLbm2nL4VHUPHGuugoAWnXhX8q8MkrYaLBqbghIGrBJd8QyebhMEJWGReoWg/phms5 NDe36sJH7YHexh6W28xUN4IkWP4hHh/zW3Q6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.6.195 with SMTP id 45mr4150283wen.86.1284484738275; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.49.78 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29707595.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <20100914005946.GA7417@freebsd.org> <29707595.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regarding pciids X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:42:34 -0000 On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Jakub Lach wrote: > > > Alexander Best-4 wrote: > > > > any thoughts on using http://pciids.sourceforge.net/ for pciids instead > of > > the > > Hart and Boemler lists. the SF site seems to be updated more regularly > and > > would get rid of the need to decide for each entry, whether to take the > > Hart or > > Boemler one. > > > > right now tools/tools/pciid/mk_pci_vendors.pl favours long descriptions > > over > > short ones which means that something like: > > > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller (8086)' > > > > will get discarded in favor of > > > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller working fine with > > http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte (8086)' > > > > +1, since I'm the one[1] with (well, not the only one, ICH9 should be quite > popular) > "http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte" device. > > best regards, > - Jakub Lach > JFYI, the sourceforge site is where Intel updates its data, and until this post I was already under the impression we pulled from there. I would say that it would be the better source. Jack