From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 07:12:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5791416A41A for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org [64.147.160.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29A3513C4BC for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: (qmail 90352 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Oct 2007 06:45:59 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:45:59 -0700 From: "David E. Thiel" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071030064559.GL82157@redundancy.redundancy.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4726561D.7090805@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4726561D.7090805@cisco.com> X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:12:28 -0000 On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:52:29PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: > Anyone looked at porting SMF to FreeBSD? Not to my knowledge. What do you feel that SMF offers that currently existing systems like rcNG or daemontools/runit do not? I haven't found SMF to be more useful or functional than those solutions, and it's certainly not as easy to use.