Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:51:54 +0000 From: Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: category qt? Message-ID: <Kkg0blDufYenYnbz3wSfMB29NtRuhodim5SprNcD_rfhvuZZd5f4eDCo4jfmShZqBC8ICfIx-dIiKJCF4BXiWWAP7BNkmSMzGHo8rI8bsnc=@protonmail.ch> In-Reply-To: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at> References: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree. > > It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I > think it is easier to find (and also easier to maintain). Indeed it is a bit annoying for me when I have to update qt* ports. I don't use portmaster or similar (I don't like them): I wrote my own utility, but it has still some issues, such as this one. I guess having all the qt* ports in the same category would help. Lorenzo Salvadore.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Kkg0blDufYenYnbz3wSfMB29NtRuhodim5SprNcD_rfhvuZZd5f4eDCo4jfmShZqBC8ICfIx-dIiKJCF4BXiWWAP7BNkmSMzGHo8rI8bsnc=>