From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 00:32:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6965316A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F98B13C43E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 23942 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2007 00:32:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.9?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@75.36.165.38 with plain) by smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 00:32:25 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: fCQ4y_8VM1m6JslUO7srdXvsyvBxX8lMBa.Ti5O.nRXqU1bOp6423AiKQERFmySEe57tRls8Eg-- Message-ID: <466B4694.3060204@lbl.gov> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:32:20 -0700 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:32:26 -0000 Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, following line causes the problem: options MAXDSIZ="(2097152U*1024)" Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen for some program? Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > I have multiple FreeBSD 6.2 machines with different hardware, but one > of them encountered > this strange error when running program "wine". > I could not figure out what causes such error since > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 absolutely exists, otherwise > no program will run. > > It does not matter if the wine is pre-compiled in packages or I built > it from ports. > All other machine do NOT have such problem. > > I reinstalled this machine a few times, and it always does the same > thing. However other programs > run well. > Would this is related to some particular hardware issue? > This one is ECS 848P-A7 motherboard with Intel P4 506+ CPU, plus 2 GB > memory. > Other machines are HP AMD64 laptop, DELL Dual XEON, DELL Intel Laptop, > and AMD XP 2100+, > and none of them ever had such problem. > > 129 /data: ldd `which wine` > /usr/local/bin/wine: > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found > /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 > > 130 /data: ll /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 158712 Jan 11 23:39 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1* > > 131 /data: wine > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found > Abort > > 132 /data: which wine > /usr/local/bin/wine > > Does someone have an idea what is happening here? > > -Jin > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 00:53:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E812216A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D365C13C469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 20743 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2007 00:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.9?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@75.36.165.38 with plain) by smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 00:53:24 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: oTN83LgVM1nwpo_8YEvc4qLGRlAschpABce.buNc120VRKSR26PwA26E45Mwih2RI0C6VVFmsV5sZIU5L9QKrJ0iIEXj6y3ejtsV350Fo3mSzIj8MAs_ylS6oqpk Message-ID: <466B4B7E.4000006@lbl.gov> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:53:18 -0700 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <466B4694.3060204@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <466B4694.3060204@lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:53:25 -0000 I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because anything equal to or below 1G options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size related. > Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, > following line causes the problem: > > options MAXDSIZ="(2097152U*1024)" > > Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen > for some program? > > Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > >> I have multiple FreeBSD 6.2 machines with different hardware, but one >> of them encountered >> this strange error when running program "wine". >> I could not figure out what causes such error since >> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 absolutely exists, otherwise >> no program will run. >> >> It does not matter if the wine is pre-compiled in packages or I built >> it from ports. >> All other machine do NOT have such problem. >> >> I reinstalled this machine a few times, and it always does the same >> thing. However other programs >> run well. >> Would this is related to some particular hardware issue? >> This one is ECS 848P-A7 motherboard with Intel P4 506+ CPU, plus 2 GB >> memory. >> Other machines are HP AMD64 laptop, DELL Dual XEON, DELL Intel >> Laptop, and AMD XP 2100+, >> and none of them ever had such problem. >> >> 129 /data: ldd `which wine` >> /usr/local/bin/wine: >> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found >> /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 >> >> 130 /data: ll /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 158712 Jan 11 23:39 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1* >> >> 131 /data: wine >> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found >> Abort >> >> 132 /data: which wine >> /usr/local/bin/wine >> >> Does someone have an idea what is happening here? >> >> -Jin >> -- ------------ Jin Guojun ----------- v --- jin@george.lbl.gov --- Distributed Systems Department http://www.dsd.lbl.gov/~jin Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 01:32:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCD316A421 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from mi1.bluebottle.com (mi1.bluebottle.com [206.188.25.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C9413C487 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mi1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5A1WMwS023396 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 18:32:22 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=bluebottle.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=received:date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-type; b=FECaqHp9Gsal+442z213beLAUO0g7yHORDVnAX6t1paPa1LKzS+at9yc1M2y2z0f0 xsLmpgtV5X2OzKVcAAlglMwlcVApelyK9hWdduuwtqj3lYPAy/eV4+I8eW8nOfI Message-Id: <200706100132.l5A1WMwS023396@mi1.bluebottle.com> Received: from linux2.gl.umbc.edu (linux2.gl.umbc.edu [130.85.24.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by fe1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5A1WH6d003653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 18:32:21 -0700 Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:32:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Xihong Yin X-X-Sender: cui1@linux2.gl.umbc.edu To: Manolis Kiagias In-Reply-To: <466B11FA.4060202@otenet.gr> References: <466B11FA.4060202@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Trusted-Delivery: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:32:23 -0000 Thank you for answering my question. I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my xorg.conf file. Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, vesa, mouse, and kbd. Xihong On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Xihong Yin wrote: > > After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "xtt" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > (EE) Failed to load module "module" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > > > Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. > > > > Please help me! > > > > Xihong > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Get a free email account with anti spam protection. > > http://www.bluebottle.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 > install. You need to change the > ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get a free email address with REAL anti-spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 01:45:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E945716A46D; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A3D13C457; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDA55D13; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:45:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466B579F.2080106@vindaloo.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:45:03 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <466B17E6.9000906@vindaloo.com> <49217.192.168.125.81.1181426436.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <49217.192.168.125.81.1181426436.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bob@a1poweruser.com, User Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:45:11 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: >> Bob wrote: >>> The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. >>> Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module >>> turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done >>> anything >>> in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting >>> or re-enable it as the default. [snip] > > seems like it was removed from the default config of lang/php5 for security > reasons. many people who do build php5 do not need the apache module, so no > sense building it if its not needed. > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 > make config > (edit your choices) > make deinstall > make reinstall > > its just one of those things that you learn to live with after a while. > Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm assuming that there is some good engineering behind this decision but I'd like to know a little more about that engineering. Is there some advantage to running php as a Fast CGI process? -- Chris P.S. Sorry Bob, I've scanned the commit logs for the port and there is no mention of security problems with mod_php5.so. To tell the truth I cannot imagine that there would be any security issues in mod_php5.so that didn't also exist in /usr/local/bin/php-cgi. I could be wrong here though and then I would have the answer to my question. -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 02:24:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D07516A421 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E687E13C45A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so430434mue for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ankp7V27SZG7vWXwGE5J1Z6A/Yuo9yCTFqZEPAMcrJEktvn8XzILxBlqJgctm7U47CQp7q0TNkRDS7CzuX+BTsUKPlykAM2ms4RJen4BjZ8iG+qNhm+MR7NqXJW0A3Ds7EEoGStKtm3BChM3711s5AqtCc5Pl9joaQfSiiBlTgI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fbmLhKsB9oAy4uD1huiMNv7F8dwODP+GoANfw3KdZzaXUCPdBXdaYrmXdfNEcuNOCEDbo6oagOR1GJTVuYhjTaJeoOpeLXrvnHswF01HkkTy2uu6DSAlAk/QRvqgpsacD+sCJvduorhOVvy3FFgCnvK3zm0vhXIV5wNd6IsphPc= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr8337455buc.1181442275380; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:24:35 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Xihong Yin" In-Reply-To: <200706100132.l5A1WMwS023396@mi1.bluebottle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466B11FA.4060202@otenet.gr> <200706100132.l5A1WMwS023396@mi1.bluebottle.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:24:37 -0000 On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin top-posted: > Thank you for answering my question. > > On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > > > Xihong Yin wrote: > > > After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. > > > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "xtt" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > > (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > > (EE) Failed to load module "module" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > > (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0 ) > > > > > > Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. > > > > > Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 > > install. You need to change the > > ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules > I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my xorg.conf file. > Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, vesa, > mouse, and kbd. There should be an entry "xorg-7.2" in /var/db/pkg (I am going on a hunch here), if not you need to install ports/x11/xorg It would probably not be a bad idea to rerun X -configure and ten-finger-merge the results with your old config file. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 02:32:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A693D16A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359B913C4BD for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so431909mue for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jpseG+2SXQ2m4/Uulr/bv5Xi6mIKgPEYcC7hxmA6bmcegQgSvslP4r5+XtLttuPwVFF481OlfZo2lPqPc9Bffi+O6iEXc7LdVH5sxFo4aE1Lq24K2WA3iU6n7QpdPDCX1hPoqjw7NTewb1aQeU4A6rwSEqoMxcwOgl0F29WQl4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GRiDcRtP6dbCVNU4hJMzaZ5/J4pvAj7qf7y3rV8qWmurr1WBMdKpUXgwU2dQwrPyxTXMt/JCQ5DERMSomYtinnJdvFH2T7TnnLVCEFrXbl5E8kzg6C1Bbkhyt5TSX+tBll32xLiLzi9av+w03xpIr4tvTBCBpfN5ZsxubQgCBnk= Received: by 10.82.123.16 with SMTP id v16mr8295559buc.1181442729652; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 21:32:09 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Mark Stout" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:32:11 -0000 On 09/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: illoai@gmail.com [mailto:illoai@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:30 PM > > To: Mark Stout > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE > > > > > > On 08/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd prefer to remain at 6.2-STABLE but I can't find where the problem is > > > with these IP errors. I'm figuring I've got a mixed code and that's the > > > root cause but I'm not sure. > > > > Did you remove your object directories before > > starting the build? > > Did you build without an /etc/make.conf? > > > I did not remove the obj directories and everything in my /etc/make.conf > file is commented out except for USA_RESIDENT and PERL_VER=5.8.8 and > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > On a mad hunch I would suspect stale files in /usr/obj/ If they are still there (and the cause of your problems) they will muss up your build on RELENG_6_2 as well. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 04:09:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C47916A468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3172313C4B9 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B4F85087F; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070610041004.2B4F85087F@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-05-20 - 2007-06-09 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:15 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 05:28:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38016A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from omta14.mta.everyone.net (sitemail2.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47D13C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from dm02.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta14.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB0240702; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:28:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm02 Received: by dm02.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 403968d3) id dm02.465dfe04.165e33; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:28:37 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQFgCwNGa4wFZiyMEwIAAAAC,93eb3b6974d2fab4a042f0d33d3e93a8 From: "Mark Stout" To: Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:28:29 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:28:37 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: illoai@gmail.com [mailto:illoai@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 7:32 PM > To: Mark Stout > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE > > > On 09/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: illoai@gmail.com [mailto:illoai@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:30 PM > > > To: Mark Stout > > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE > > > > > > > > > On 08/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I'd prefer to remain at 6.2-STABLE but I can't find where > the problem is > > > > with these IP errors. I'm figuring I've got a mixed code > and that's the > > > > root cause but I'm not sure. > > > > > > Did you remove your object directories before > > > starting the build? > > > Did you build without an /etc/make.conf? > > > > > I did not remove the obj directories and everything in my /etc/make.conf > > file is commented out except for USA_RESIDENT and PERL_VER=5.8.8 and > > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > > > > On a mad hunch I would suspect stale files in /usr/obj/ > If they are still there (and the cause of your problems) > they will muss up your build on RELENG_6_2 as well. > > -- > -- So how should I fix this? Thank you, Mark Stout VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. 530-626-4218 x205 Office 530-626-7182 Fax 530-554-9295 VoIP 916-240-2850 Cell www.vpm.com This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited, and asked to notify us immediately, then delete this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 05:33:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BAF16A421 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CC413C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-150083.home.otenet.gr [85.75.129.225]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l5A5XE4u000923 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:33:15 +0300 Message-ID: <466B8D1A.3080206@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:33:14 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <466B11FA.4060202@otenet.gr> <200706100132.l5A1WMwS023396@mi1.bluebottle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:33:18 -0000 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin top-posted: >> Thank you for answering my question. >> >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: >> >> > Xihong Yin wrote: >> > > After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error >> when I start X. >> > > >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "xtt" (module does not exist, 0 ) >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0 ) >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "module" (module does not exist, 0 ) >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0 ) >> > > >> > > Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. >> > > > >> > Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 >> > install. You need to change the >> > ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules > >> I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my >> xorg.conf file. >> Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, >> vesa, >> mouse, and kbd. > > There should be an entry "xorg-7.2" > in /var/db/pkg (I am going on a hunch > here), if not you need to install ports/x11/xorg > > It would probably not be a bad idea to rerun > X -configure and ten-finger-merge the results > with your old config file. > You may also do a pkg_info | grep xorg and see what xorg packages where actually installed. My guess is you are missing the xorg-drivers metaport for some reason (since you are missing such basic things as kbd and vesa) but doing a complete install of ports/x11/xorg as suggested wouldn't harm. If you want to go with the drivers only thing, the metaport would be ports/x11-drivers/xorg-drivers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 06:13:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC6116A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056F513C4B0 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxGgO-0005m9-Em for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:13:48 -0700 Message-ID: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pluta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: peter@placidpublishing.net Subject: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:13:49 -0000 How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with spamassassin. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-RBL%27s-tf3896464.html#a11046174 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 07:48:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640CB16A469; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [82.208.36.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227BB13C447; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1656819E02A; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:31:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2FB19E027; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:31:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466BA8D5.9090009@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:31:33 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Hilton References: <466B17E6.9000906@vindaloo.com> <49217.192.168.125.81.1181426436.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <466B579F.2080106@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <466B579F.2080106@vindaloo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, User Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:48:44 -0000 Christopher Hilton wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: [...] > > Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to > build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds > php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm > assuming that there is some good engineering behind this decision but > I'd like to know a little more about that engineering. Is there some > advantage to running php as a Fast CGI process? I guess that mod_php5 depends on Apache and maintainer don't want this big dependency. The second is - if it will depends on Apache of some version (eg. 1.3) it will be broken with another version (2.0 and 2.2). It apply for binary packages. If somebody is compiling ports himself, then can check option "with apache" or add WITH_APACHE in to /etc/make.conf Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 07:57:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E6C16A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E5313C43E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id RAA06975; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:56:56 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:56:55 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Christopher Hilton In-Reply-To: <20070610023218.3BA7016A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:57:38 -0000 On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:45:03 -0400 Christopher Hilton wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > >> Bob wrote: > >>> The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5-STABLE here. I ran into this updating phpMyAdmin last year, which also enforced upgrading from php4 to php5 - unnecessarily, according to the phpMyAdmin specs - and made it no longer possible to install php5 (thus eg phpMyAdmin) from the packages .. > >>> Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module > >>> turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done > >>> anything > >>> in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting > >>> or re-enable it as the default. > > [snip] > > > > > seems like it was removed from the default config of lang/php5 for security > > reasons. many people who do build php5 do not need the apache module, so no > > sense building it if its not needed. I may be wrong of course, but my observation is that the majority of people (who mention) installing php do so for use as an apache module. > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 > > make config > > (edit your choices) > > make deinstall > > make reinstall > > > > its just one of those things that you learn to live with after a while. Mmmm. I don't see how it would hurt people who do want to use PHP as a CLI language, or for CGI, if mod_php5 were to be built by default also, making the php package useful again. libphp5.so is under 3MB. > Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to > build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds > php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm > assuming that there is some good engineering behind this decision but > I'd like to know a little more about that engineering. Is there some > advantage to running php as a Fast CGI process? > > -- Chris > > P.S. Sorry Bob, I've scanned the commit logs for the port and there is > no mention of security problems with mod_php5.so. To tell the truth I > cannot imagine that there would be any security issues in mod_php5.so > that didn't also exist in /usr/local/bin/php-cgi. I could be wrong here > though and then I would have the answer to my question. Colour me curious too. It appears more like a personal preference than engineering as such. It might also reflect the relative disrepute that installing from packages has fallen into, as those having leading edge hardware tend to forget the convenience and speed of packages compared to especially large compilations on sub-GHz boxes. And of CDROM sets. That said, I'm thankful to developers that it even exists as a port :) Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:21:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECA016A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8A413C457 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so333301anc for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:21:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oDW4dToqmJbDk208zFTI0p+qUlA7Kc8EkTZ51PsdDYFmX/nJzXx6ojuZEqZ9FAU6ZeBHRZlTKPG2LWt8E7vqiJUhKKaD2eGZvgC80GIJRhWxl3cTj57b2QiopElPHqgH0IuEGSpK+tt37AlcmPPRltcmTfVkXTdXZfOIVTnvqUo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j2W94D5vq8AuTF0I6w2fo2SnIpaRREdadWCXMtsPkdvjRnSU5JLArMdzFp6ew+cPuqMU2e3HOMO+KKKZgiu+9AVj03qi0K0E2tFK+Z212mSRCSsCL0WXHyopUpsqOdCw7s51LKARz3RmtUl1V6+V2Rq1yWK3gTDcEBzruqB75/8= Received: by 10.100.133.9 with SMTP id g9mr2689537and.1181463678825; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706100121w3489f6b4m2f3ab62d33fda3eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:21:18 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Mark Stout" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:21:19 -0000 On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > So how should I fix this? > > Thank you, > Mark Stout cd /usr/src make cleanworld mergemaster -p make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel reboot cd /usr/src make installworld mergemaster -iU reboot You are done. :) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:29:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29A516A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E49413C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5A8TStr065792; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:29:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l5A8TStr065792 Message-ID: <466BB668.2060909@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:29:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070521) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:29:40 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.3/3391/Sat Jun 9 16:08:49 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:29:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ian Smith wrote: > Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected > users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5-STABLE here. I ran into this updating > phpMyAdmin last year, which also enforced upgrading from php4 to php5 - > unnecessarily, according to the phpMyAdmin specs - and made it no longer > possible to install php5 (thus eg phpMyAdmin) from the packages .. That is incorrect. The phpMyAdmin port works perfectly well with php4. The *default* version of php that the port would cause to be installed as a dependency if there was no previously installed php on the system - -- that changed from 4 to 5 a while back, but that was actually a result of system-wide changes in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.php.mk Note that there is not a lot of point installing phpMyAdmin from packages. The phpMyAdmin port does not compile anything -- all it does it pull down the dist files and copy them into place. Essentially what the package does, except that the port gives you immensely greater flexibility in fitting in with alternate dependencies. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGa7Zn8Mjk52CukIwRCK2YAJ0ZaUx7KmDopyaLLtb6HeV0A4HlTQCdHEP8 kUKvXN9SrbwxmRFxspGRqhY= =vw6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 09:41:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7357016A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=tyW4Ee=LK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout13.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout13.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E4313C45A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=tyW4Ee=LK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan10.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.10] helo=mailscan10.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout13.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1HxJRw-0000PU-Pk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:11:04 -0400 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8] ident=exim) by mailscan10.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1HxJRw-0005Ob-N4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:11:04 -0400 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8] helo=authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan10.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1HxJRw-0005OS-0L; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:11:04 -0400 Received: from cpe-24-93-100-44.columbus.res.rr.com ([24.93.100.44] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1HxJRu-0002ug-PW; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:11:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:11:18 -0400 From: "Zane C.B." To: Tom Grove Message-ID: <20070610051118.5b2133ac@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <46680EB2.2000209@voidmain.net> References: <46680EB2.2000209@voidmain.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: "Zane C.B." X-EN-OrigIP: 24.93.100.44 X-EN-OrigHost: cpe-24-93-100-44.columbus.res.rr.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ZFS in 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:41:45 -0000 On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:57:06 -0400 Tom Grove wrote: > Any chance that ZFS will make it into 6.3 or is this a 7.0 only > feature? =46rom my understanding, this is very unlikely to happen due to the large number of changes to the VFS including API changes. That is aimed at being kept stable as possible for the stable major version. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:31:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410D716A46D for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from ns.uni-svishtov.bg (ns2.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B68713C468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from mail.uni-svishtov.bg (grinch.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.9]) by ns.uni-svishtov.bg (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5ABW8e7023733 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:32:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from localhost (mail.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.9]) by mail.uni-svishtov.bg (8.13.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5ABTkGF071662 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:29:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:29:46 +0300 From: Angelin Lalev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Sender: lalev@uni-svishtov.bg User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.uni-svishtov.bg Subject: passing parameters to configure script of a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:31:29 -0000 Hi, I want to build squid from ports, but I need to pass some custom options to configure script. Something more, I want to be sure that when I run portupdate it won't revert to default options. Which is the right way to do this ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 12:13:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE1016A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D4113C45A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB0B508D3 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:41:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5ABfaUu082643 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:41:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5ABfaV0082642 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:41:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:41:36 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070610114136.GB74858@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: Re: passing parameters to configure script of a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:13:59 -0000 On Sunday, 10 June, 2007 at 14:29:46 +0300, Angelin Lalev wrote: > > I want to build squid from ports, but I need to pass some custom options to configure script. Something > more, I want to be sure that when I run portupdate it won't revert to default options. Which is the > right way to do this ? ports-mgmt/portconf may be what you are looking for. I use it to select the correct dictionary for ispell. Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Please send your reply to the list only. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 12:25:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5392016A46D for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD92613C44C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l5ACPqLr022465; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:25:52 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:25:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <466B2502.4040007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <466B2502.4040007@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706101425.52001.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Eric Mesa Subject: Re: problems building ftgl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:25:57 -0000 On Sunday 10 June 2007, Eric Mesa wrote: > Whenever I try to build blender, it stops at ftgl, and I get: > > checking GL/gl.h usability... no > checking GL/gl.h presence... no > checking for GL/gl.h... no > configure: error: GL/gl.h is needed > exit: Illegal number: please > exit: Illegal number: please > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ftgl. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/blender-devel > > This is a headless system, so I don't have any GUIs installed. I'm > just trying to install the minimum X needed for blender - so I may be > missing something. The whole xorg 7.2 build process was clear as mud > for me. > > Thanks for any help you can provide. Reading the error message above leads me to think you need to install graphics/libGL. HTH, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 12:55:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A645016A46B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4593A13C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id WAA14562; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:54:54 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:54:53 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <466BB668.2060909@infracaninophile.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:55:34 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > > > Around 6.0 may have been the timeline for this change, but it affected > > users of 5.4 and 5.5 too; one 5.5-STABLE here. I ran into this updating > > phpMyAdmin last year, which also enforced upgrading from php4 to php5 - > > unnecessarily, according to the phpMyAdmin specs - and made it no longer > > possible to install php5 (thus eg phpMyAdmin) from the packages .. > > That is incorrect. The phpMyAdmin port works perfectly well with php4. > The *default* version of php that the port would cause to be installed > as a dependency if there was no previously installed php on the system > - -- that changed from 4 to 5 a while back, but that was actually a result > of system-wide changes in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.php.mk To be fair, that was on a huge portupgrade from 5.4-R to 5-STABLE last December involving most ports including xorg and kde, and upgrading the installed php4 to php5 (as a consequence of the _then_ dependency tree) was the only thing that proved problematic, and that using using every prefetched package that portupgrade -anPP could find first. At the time, after a couple of days' struggle, I relented and went with php5, and after the aforementioned making config then installing the php5 port, all was plain sailing. As I recall it may have been a dependency of phpMyAdmin, pecl-pdflib, that kept insisting on php5? Anyway, water under the bridge; phpMyAdmin 2.9.1 works fine, and I soon have another big upgrade to do (patiently awaiting xorg 7 packages :) > Note that there is not a lot of point installing phpMyAdmin from > packages. The phpMyAdmin port does not compile anything -- all it > does it pull down the dist files and copy them into place. Essentially > what the package does, except that the port gives you immensely greater > flexibility in fitting in with alternate dependencies. On a 300MHz laptop with a 'fast' 5400rpm drive, packages are the go wherever possible, but I'll try remembering that. It's a nice port. Thanks Matthew, Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 14:06:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0EA16A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AE113C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5AE0k9t068088; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:00:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l5AE0k9t068088 Message-ID: <466C040E.4080309@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:00:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070521) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:00:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.3/3395/Sun Jun 10 12:45:33 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:06:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ian Smith wrote: > Anyway, water under the bridge; phpMyAdmin 2.9.1 works fine, and I soon > have another big upgrade to do (patiently awaiting xorg 7 packages :) I take it you are aware of: http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-1 http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-2 http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-3 http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-4 and have taken steps to secure your phpMyAdmin installation. Wrapping phpMyAdmin inside HTTP Basic Auth is a good idea. Even better if you can also serve it via HTTPS. Upgrading to the latest released version (2.10.1) is certainly recommended. This isn't excessive paranoia -- there are webcrawlers in the wild hunting for phpMyAdmin installations by trying all the common URLs that PMA gets installed as, including what I recommend in the port. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGbAQO8Mjk52CukIwRCDTBAJ0Yt6J0uDfwO8AZQJD2avYSTGjg0ACffbqW YahKpz0N617yWWbANwHsepc= =r04R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 14:35:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8864916A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3474113C487 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1054375wxd for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uTzVNzGLydEMiZd8wXzoK4RzNqAMfxJzTc+myIlGyqZt9BkviSwzKPAxwd4WMQAJCW22tCnw2C9gZ3gOj/L7JqnZkIPS1p7aYJqkSUU/Lah03HTW7R6n9vXnR7A7MICPDiGQF5B0dkBy3I3bUjeWKZcwZ5zNwrPyvtP/oLK6A2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bV9eJvmNpdFXxsSfJ3FH1tsmYQ7dKeNAGKqWa7nRED4/9t0Zr9eFXZ+Q8mFdAhQQa7163OLt7eKP0FQ6MtY3fq8bz4apkuTcxNikz5WA9NR/h+LuxFbzX5A0jimk5ki96HQ7YNjjAiTZe/Liwb5f6KPHBFMFSMXy4FlEVxxGvlM= Received: by 10.70.47.19 with SMTP id u19mr7175474wxu.1181486137619; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mario.mushroomkingdom ( [24.126.49.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h39sm6702617wxd.2007.06.10.07.35.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466C0C36.7050101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:35:34 -0400 From: Eric Mesa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: UNIX - questions X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: re: problems building ftgl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:35:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Whenever I try to build blender, it stops at ftgl, and I get: > > checking GL/gl.h usability... no checking GL/gl.h presence... no > checking for GL/gl.h... no configure: error: GL/gl.h is needed > exit: Illegal number: please exit: Illegal number: please > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ftgl. *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/blender-devel > > This is a headless system, so I don't have any GUIs installed. I'm > just trying to install the minimum X needed for blender - so I may > be missing something. The whole xorg 7.2 build process was clear > as mud for me. > > Thanks for any help you can provide. I'm trying installing graphics/libGL to see if this fixes the problem. I'll report back if it does or doesn't. - -- Eric Mesa ericsbinaryworld@gmail.com http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and that the email was not changed in transit. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGbAw1PvU+8ApmWXIRAvvKAJ4tbZJNHCaw0BJwpLZZeCg+DwqyyACcDVAE 03BhzrRuU/Fs9xhAHzUdRng= =szQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 15:42:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB6B16A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from mi1.bluebottle.com (mi1.bluebottle.com [206.188.25.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2D913C48C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from fe1.bluebottle.com (internal.bluebottle.com [206.188.24.43]) by mi1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5AFgJcd015171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:42:19 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=bluebottle.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=received:date:from:x-x-sender:to:subject:in-reply-to: message-id:references:mime-version:content-type; b=SbJ4S+vAgbiSfja9C5MqCEeQ45b5Jg2E8EeVzMsCDtpbnohZhoo5rZGEMjdi1FMdb zw7buGF2yegT77EaQb5cGV6Z6PNYMR/tAB8A+IAiKZpNbvyq0zmlQrgaB3H0VXK Received: from linux1.gl.umbc.edu (linux1.gl.umbc.edu [130.85.24.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by fe1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5AFgAeL022132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:42:18 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:42:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Xihong Yin X-X-Sender: cui1@linux1.gl.umbc.edu To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <466B8D1A.3080206@otenet.gr> Message-ID: References: <466B11FA.4060202@otenet.gr> <200706100132.l5A1WMwS023396@mi1.bluebottle.com> <466B8D1A.3080206@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Trusted-Delivery: Subject: Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:42:19 -0000 It is resolved by using 'portmanager x11/xorg -f'. However, now I have another problem regarding starting X. It is an 'unable to connect to X server' error. I can only start X when I login as root. If I login as normal user, I got error message saying: ----------------------------------- waiting for X server to begin accepting connections . AUDIT: Sun Jun 10 11:29:26 2007: 1085 X: client 1 rejected from local host (uid 1001) Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified .. AUDIT: Sun Jun 10 11:29:26 2007: 1085 X: client 1 rejected from local host (uid 1001) Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified ..FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" refcount is 2, should be 1; fixing. giving up xinit: Connection refused(errno 61): unable to connect to X server xinit: No such process (errno 3): Server error ----------------------------------- Could you help again? Thanks, Xihong On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin top-posted: > >> Thank you for answering my question. > >> > >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> > >> > Xihong Yin wrote: > >> > > After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error > >> when I start X. > >> > > > >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "xtt" (module does not exist, 0 ) > >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0 ) > >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "module" (module does not exist, 0 ) > >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0 ) > >> > > > >> > > Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. > >> > > > > > >> > Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 > >> > install. You need to change the > >> > ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules > > > >> I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my > >> xorg.conf file. > >> Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, > >> vesa, > >> mouse, and kbd. > > > > There should be an entry "xorg-7.2" > > in /var/db/pkg (I am going on a hunch > > here), if not you need to install ports/x11/xorg > > > > It would probably not be a bad idea to rerun > > X -configure and ten-finger-merge the results > > with your old config file. > > > You may also do a pkg_info | grep xorg and see what xorg packages where > actually installed. > My guess is you are missing the xorg-drivers metaport for some reason > (since you are missing such basic things as kbd and vesa) but doing a > complete install of ports/x11/xorg as suggested wouldn't harm. If you > want to go with the drivers only thing, the metaport would be > ports/x11-drivers/xorg-drivers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Free pop3 email with a spam filter. http://www.bluebottle.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 16:19:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ECE16A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@df48.dot5hosting.com) Received: from df48.dot5hosting.com (df48.dot5hosting.com [72.22.92.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F00E13C46C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@df48.dot5hosting.com) Received: (qmail 69142 invoked by uid 3128); 10 Jun 2007 15:47:47 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by df48.dot5hosting.com (envelope-from , uid 80) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88/1245. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):SA:0(3.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.521291 secs); 10 Jun 2007 15:47:47 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: +++ Date: 10 Jun 2007 15:47:46 -0000 Message-ID: <20070610154746.69091.qmail@df48.dot5hosting.com> To: questions@freebsd.org From: Anglican Mission House MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Job Advertiment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: advert@themissionhouse.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:19:28 -0000 Anglican Mission House Work Opportunity........ ........Are you currently looking for an opportunity to work from home or direct from your computer. There is an sensational opportunity for you to work with Anglican Mission House. This is a fantastic opportunity to build an extremely rewarding career and these opportunities would suit people who need flexible working arrangements and Located anywhere in New Zealand, Canada and USA. We have got several opportunities available for customer service/ consultants/Accounting/management sectors with a negotiable good salary starting from $5000.00 - $45,000.00. The successful candidate will need to have customer service experience and a computer with internet connnetion. Also you need to like working in a team environment and have good communication skills. **No prior experience required **Work from home --- No daily commute! **Spend more time with your family! *we are assuring you that at no time will you be required to make any upfront payments of your personal funds to us for whatever reason. **Computer at home with access to broadband and checking your email messages at least twice everyday! You can apply for for this work opportunity through this link below: APPLICATION FORM LINK: http://www.gumussuyu.net/magaza/new/ Anglican Mission House Advertment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 16:26:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B7216A46B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BA313C455 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5AGQiMi075686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:26:46 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466C2644.8000303@webanoide.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:26:44 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri References: <499c70c0706100121w3489f6b4m2f3ab62d33fda3eb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706100121w3489f6b4m2f3ab62d33fda3eb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Stout Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:26:49 -0000 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: >> >> So how should I fix this? >> >> Thank you, >> Mark Stout > > cd /usr/src > make cleanworld > mergemaster -p > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > reboot > > cd /usr/src > make installworld > mergemaster -iU > reboot > > You are done. :) The *correct* procedure is described in: /usr/src/Makefile and even more detailed at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 16:55:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C788816A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3417013C483 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5AGthYR076053 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:55:44 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:55:43 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Pluta References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:55:47 -0000 Peter Pluta wrote: > How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, > amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that > shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything > useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with spamassassin. > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. RBL is already enabled in SA. Probably you should increase the values SA assigns to RBL checks. See: http://www.spamhaus.org/effective_filtering.html Skim through: /usr/local/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf Just a thought. You may consider implementing RBL at MTA level (postfix in your case). It is a lot faster then processing through SA, which is a resource hog. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:02:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA13616A46C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F40113C455 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5AH2Ofh076175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:02:25 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466C2EA0.6020801@webanoide.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:02:24 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Angelin Lalev References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: passing parameters to configure script of a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:02:27 -0000 Angelin Lalev wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build squid from ports, but I need to pass some custom options to configure script. Something > more, I want to be sure that when I run portupdate it won't revert to default options. Which is the > right way to do this ? This might help: http://blog.innerewut.de/articles/2006/01/14/upgrading-ports-and-preserve-make-options Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:15:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D8D16A468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE6213C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id DAA21125; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:23 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:22 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <466C040E.4080309@infracaninophile.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, Christopher Hilton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:15:26 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > > > Anyway, water under the bridge; phpMyAdmin 2.9.1 works fine, and I soon > > have another big upgrade to do (patiently awaiting xorg 7 packages :) > > I take it you are aware of: > > http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-1 > http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-2 > http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-3 > http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security.php?issue=PMASA-2007-4 I am now, thanks. > and have taken steps to secure your phpMyAdmin installation. Wrapping > phpMyAdmin inside HTTP Basic Auth is a good idea. Even better if you > can also serve it via HTTPS. Upgrading to the latest released version > (2.10.1) is certainly recommended. I'm only running it on localhost currently for local database work, not externally accessible, but your warnings are well appreciated. Frankly I don't have much confidence in PHP's security generally, let alone for complex applications like phpMyAdmin using lots of javascript and such, yet find pma the most useful thing for working with Mysql databases. > This isn't excessive paranoia -- there are webcrawlers in the wild > hunting for phpMyAdmin installations by trying all the common URLs > that PMA gets installed as, including what I recommend in the port. Indeed it's not excessive; noticed here on Saturday on several sites on a public server that's NOT running phpMyAdmin (all from this IP, fwiw): 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:44 +1000] "GET /phpmyadmin/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 287 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:44 +1000] "GET /PMA/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 280 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:45 +1000] "GET /mysql/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 282 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:45 +1000] "GET /admin/main.php HTTP/1.0" 401 471 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:46 +1000] "GET /db/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 279 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:46 +1000] "GET /dbadmin/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 284 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:47 +1000] "GET /web/phpMyAdmin/main.php HTTP/1.0" 404 291 "-" "pmafind" 87.106.25.69 - - [09/Jun/2007:18:05:47 +1000] "GET /admin/pma/main.php HTTP/1.0" 401 471 "-" "pmafind" Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 18:09:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C410516A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A1B13C45B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxRrC-0001wo-C9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:09:42 -0700 Message-ID: <11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:09:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pluta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: peter@placidpublishing.net References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:09:43 -0000 Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote: > > Peter Pluta wrote: >> How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, >> amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that >> shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything >> useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with >> spamassassin. >> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > > RBL is already enabled in SA. Probably you should increase the values SA > assigns to RBL checks. See: > > http://www.spamhaus.org/effective_filtering.html > > Skim through: > > /usr/local/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf > > > Just a thought. You may consider implementing RBL at MTA level (postfix > in your case). It is a lot faster then processing through SA, which is a > resource hog. > > > > Regards, > Mikhail. > > -- > Mikhail Goriachev > Webanoide > > Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 > Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 > E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org > Web: www.webanoide.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks, I think postfix already does the basic RBl's. PTR records and stuff like that, but i'm still getting some ugly spam. When I feed the spam ip's into dnsstuff.com's spam database many of the databases show it as blacklisted, so i'm guessing the RBL's are not functioning correctly. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-RBL%27s-tf3896464.html#a11050907 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 18:46:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA44F16A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7880113C46E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so917135nzn for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mKZPsQtzcseciaURhGvXatxxOcUpksjzKnl64VShvzlLWKLaOBWzTEvE5VffU0dDv0iWi3KbjyGESbuvlqoHITMHFdKSTYAjDv7WPeJU2FhulhGQl6zn4LUjHW+yctlnvlcyJdFGr8ELUIfkM0nTsJBcD+vDm4UW9IbsGhmPOFw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=flwTR8mh+RufPIH7cdmztAx1vw4OeWp+W56nIKTS+6JlWZlbLdUZsN8mqum7V7xgOq7CAQxSs0c/MojB7eti0HTI+tIlWWRhB3cS28yGDr0mp2E/1Pu7awth55zOfCewnxXFko9Bu/2jGIrCWzhqbd6OF0vZx4DLKLHBft4x7Zg= Received: by 10.143.2.19 with SMTP id e19mr74382wfi.1181501215395; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.254.1 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26ddd1750706101146r518a29acr34f76e3c7f251296@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:46:55 -0400 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070610114136.GB74858@oberon.njm.f2s.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070610114136.GB74858@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Subject: Re: passing parameters to configure script of a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:46:56 -0000 On 6/10/07, N.J. Mann wrote: > On Sunday, 10 June, 2007 at 14:29:46 +0300, Angelin Lalev wrote: > > > > I want to build squid from ports, but I need to pass some custom options to configure script. Something > > more, I want to be sure that when I run portupdate it won't revert to default options. Which is the > > right way to do this ? > > ports-mgmt/portconf may be what you are looking for. I use it to select > the correct dictionary for ispell. > > > Cheers, > Nick. I don't think he is asking about preserving port knobs, he wants a way to directly pass arguments to the configure command, and I don't think there is a way to do this. I would actually also like this sort of functionality, because for some ports the knobs are not enough. For example, when you build php5-pdo_sqlite there is no way to specify that the extension should be built as shared. There was a way to do this before all php ports were reorganized, and it was only there because I submitted a patch to the maintainer. After the reorganization it was taken out again. Right now, there is no way to install sqlite separately and have the extension use your existing library. It always insists of compiling the bundled version, even though the parameters to use something else are there. The result is that there is no way for me to upgrade the sqlite version used by php even if the port has something newer. I would have to modify the Makefile manually and then lose all changes when it is updated. Portconf is a good way to make sure that things are upgraded properly, I use it to transfer configurations from one machine to another which is also convenient. However, I wish there was a universal knob that we could use to specify our own configure parameters for those ports that don't have knobs for our desired functionality. - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:03:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0787016A469; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0A113C45A; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05E15C3B; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:03:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466C4AF1.6090106@vindaloo.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:03:13 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <466B17E6.9000906@vindaloo.com> <49217.192.168.125.81.1181426436.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> <466B579F.2080106@vindaloo.com> <466BA8D5.9090009@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <466BA8D5.9090009@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Horne , bob@a1poweruser.com, User Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:03:16 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > I guess that mod_php5 depends on Apache and maintainer don't want this > big dependency. The second is - if it will depends on Apache of some > version (eg. 1.3) it will be broken with another version (2.0 and 2.2). > It apply for binary packages. If somebody is compiling ports himself, > then can check option "with apache" or add WITH_APACHE in to /etc/make.conf > > That makes sense almost to the point of justifying the existence of a mod_php5 port for those people who want apache+mod_php5. However given the fact that this would double the workload on the maintainer I understand. Thanks -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:26:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E4F16A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D232A13C468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045EA5C3B; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:26:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:26:33 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Pluta References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> <11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:35 -0000 Peter Pluta wrote: > > Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote: >> Peter Pluta wrote: >>> How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, >>> amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that >>> shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything >>> useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with >>> spamassassin. >>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. >> >> [snip] >> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf >> >> You will also want to look at: /usr/local/share/spamassassin/5-_scores.cf There are two ways to use the rbls. You can either raise the score for being in the RBL above SA's threshold. Or you can out and out block servers in the RBL from your MTA. You probably want to be carefull with the latter technique since is transfers onus of the work of delivering the mail into the wrong hands. I just spent 3 hours diagnosing a problem for a client on Friday. It turns out that people weren't able to deliver email to him and for the past 6 months he's believed that there was some intermittent problem with his ISP's mailserver. The actual problem is that his ISP is using an overzealous RBL. I found out about this because my delivery server was listed in his RBL due to some mistake that happened in 1999 before my ISP got the IP address. The practical upshot for my client was that until he could find someone who could both see and diagnose the problem he just wasn't receiving mail and thus he was loosing business. Nota Bene for all users of RBLs. -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:33:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73A016A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEA813C447 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxT9o-0003QN-6E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:33:00 -0700 Message-ID: <11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:33:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Pluta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: peter@placidpublishing.net References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> <11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com> Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:33:00 -0000 Christopher Hilton wrote: > > Peter Pluta wrote: >> >> Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote: >>> Peter Pluta wrote: >>>> How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, >>>> amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that >>>> shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find >>>> anything >>>> useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with >>>> spamassassin. >>>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> > > [snip] > >>> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf >>> >>> > > You will also want to look at: > > /usr/local/share/spamassassin/5-_scores.cf > > There are two ways to use the rbls. You can either raise the score for > being in the RBL above SA's threshold. Or you can out and out block > servers in the RBL from your MTA. You probably want to be carefull with > the latter technique since is transfers onus of the work of delivering > the mail into the wrong hands. > > I just spent 3 hours diagnosing a problem for a client on Friday. It > turns out that people weren't able to deliver email to him and for the > past 6 months he's believed that there was some intermittent problem > with his ISP's mailserver. The actual problem is that his ISP is using > an overzealous RBL. I found out about this because my delivery server > was listed in his RBL due to some mistake that happened in 1999 before > my ISP got the IP address. The practical upshot for my client was that > until he could find someone who could both see and diagnose the problem > he just wasn't receiving mail and thus he was loosing business. Nota > Bene for all users of RBLs. > > -- > __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." > _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks > ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ > Christopher Sean Hilton > pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I see, I disabled bayes and awl in spamassassin, and updated amavisd-new from ports. I have a different problem. Mail I am sending out is being thrown away because it's being flagged as spam. I'm stumped, it never did this before. Log entry: Jun 10 14:23:59 mail amavis[541]: (00541-04) cached f6255bb01c648fe967714d52a89e8e9c from (1,0) Jun 10 14:24:00 mail amavis[541]: (00541-04) Blocked SPAM, [67.175.92.171] [67.175.92.171] -> , Message-ID: <466C4F06.9080503@placidp ublishing.net>, mail_id: kj76mFHOu5uA, Hits: 5.651, size: 775, 638 ms Jun 10 14:24:00 mail postfix/smtp[785]: 7A5215083F: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.84, delays=0.18/0.01/0/0.64, dsn=2.7.0, status=sent (250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=00541-04 - SPAM) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-RBL%27s-tf3896464.html#a11051531 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:26:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF3716A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EE513C489 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.255.86]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5AK8Xwv024715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:08:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5AJxsDM015278 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:59:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <466C582A.8080002@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:59:38 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: portsclean -L after X.org upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:26:23 -0000 Hello. As per subject, I get a lot of warning like the ones following: > ** /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 is shadowed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 > /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 > --> Two packages install the same library in different directories! > > ** /usr/local/lib/libviaXvMC.so.1 is shadowed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libviaXvMC.so.1 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libviaXvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-via-0.2.2_1 > /usr/local/lib/libviaXvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-via-0.2.2_1 > --> Two packages install the same library in different directories! > > ** /usr/local/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so.1 is shadowed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so.1 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so.1 <- xf86-video-via-0.2.2_1 > /usr/local/lib/libviaXvMCPro.so.1 <- xf86-video-via-0.2.2_1 > --> Two packages install the same library in different directories! > > ** /usr/local/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0 is shadowed by > /usr/X11R6/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0 <- scrollkeeper-0.3.14_8,1 > /usr/local/lib/libscrollkeeper.so.0 <- scrollkeeper-0.3.14_8,1 > --> Two packages install the same library in different directories! > > ** /usr/local/lib/libcaca.so.0 is shadowed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libcaca.so.0 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libcaca.so.0 <- libcaca-0.99.b11_1 > /usr/local/lib/libcaca.so.0 <- libcaca-0.99.b11_1 > --> Two packages install the same library in different directories! What about them? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:25:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADCC16A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64DF213C484 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.88] by n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2007 21:13:03 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.132] by t4.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2007 21:13:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jun 2007 21:13:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 100920.12788.bm@rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 70534 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2007 21:13:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=UhCK8mPMfZJzWRYTZUbs4nxGA1+mZfrm2hP+GJrJzJCyXOl17BYnSCUgMZfD0R1Qcg8xB1SFWToeNLH9EIjBzpatpxOIkj3v0JkNtLaXaktNXl6rdeVLDdeb/rltywuF/gbg5gSZp8ftAPcoiHj65C3ii+iW6+bfj7kLKBc3eac=; X-YMail-OSG: 3dyWDusVM1kv6QD4h2bsT.uva6vS_mz4HsBQf6cqDboMS2FcyQSv4lv1C3ViStOEXmppN4iuGfjBZPVAvtwh1hau4T402vilD24- Received: from [76.211.254.121] by web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:13:02 PDT Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:13:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Subject: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:56 -0000 People, I need help with sendmail on my FreeBSD box running: FreeBSD 5.3 Specifically, I need help using sendmail to send mail. I inherited this FreeBSD box from a guy who left for another gig. The box appears to be stable. It's been up since Nov 2006 and is running a couple of simple web sites. The web sites work okay. We want to put up a 3rd site which needs to send mail to people who register. I'm assuming that I need to get sendmail working. That is, I need it to send mail. It does not need to receive mail because we are using google apps to receive all of our mail from the outside. It was easy to setup: -Follow directions here: http://google.com/a/ -Update the MX records for our domains When I try using sendmail I run this simple test: 1. create a text file, sendme.txt: From: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Subject: test mail Hi Bjorn Bye Bjorn 2. Run shell command: /usr/sbin/sendmail bornboulder77@yahoo.com < sendme.txt Result: The mail is not delivered. I'd welcome any tips for configuring sendmail to send mail. -b ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:57:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378B16A41F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5C813C483 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2338031pyi for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:57:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CJrlRVoo0CXlI3PG5hcT4lMdIe+HuVccsUjjYSNDH2/ZWsdWzaw43U1bmcoGbidttATuURTXOgES6Yw8Y5dXwR3CkWtFfaS0MATHZKDKpKHlR7woCKAyVPJw7eg4Ycq3QGmO8mmfFxu2ZCTMtfAS6Hv0p1W2bgdLlN373x5/aoU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ccowPbtgCzlIasJDsd6Wx7ytejfm1MFvJ97r9xYB/jv1VKbHP9QdutfVwJLp90sbTekLrKFo/koOWxZPoFDiDUf5UOAnyNQkBKjYSz3jvC350OHTKd1nYVXcmRtD9uKa8I1CG5tlLMZZLBLN2hwlBUQcqSGrUlFZMLWoPH0zFlM= Received: by 10.114.196.1 with SMTP id t1mr4867428waf.1181512672235; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.37.10 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860706101457w67082941r7d5c1006c55da345@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:57:52 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: "Bjorn Boulder" In-Reply-To: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:57:54 -0000 On 6/10/07, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > > > People, > > I need help with sendmail on my FreeBSD box running: > FreeBSD 5.3 > > Specifically, I need help using sendmail to send mail. > > I inherited this FreeBSD box from a guy who left for > another gig. > > The box appears to be stable. It's been up since Nov > 2006 > and is running a couple of simple web sites. > > The web sites work okay. > > We want to put up a 3rd site which needs to send mail > to people who register. > > I'm assuming that I need to get sendmail working. > > That is, I need it to send mail. > > It does not need to receive mail because we are using > google apps to receive all of our mail from the > outside. > > It was easy to setup: > > -Follow directions here: http://google.com/a/ > -Update the MX records for our domains > > When I try using sendmail I run this simple test: > > 1. create a text file, sendme.txt: > > From: bornboulder77@yahoo.com > Subject: test mail > Hi Bjorn > Bye Bjorn > > 2. Run shell command: > /usr/sbin/sendmail bornboulder77@yahoo.com < > sendme.txt > > Result: The mail is not delivered. > > I'd welcome any tips for configuring sendmail to send > mail. > > -b > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready > for the edge of your seat? > Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sendmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:58:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1836D16A468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4AD13C4CE for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so932440nzn for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PzhSN/4h+t7Gyg4AHkW2zmSo/s6dIt2DzjfvaLeR8JcHB+k1tpPgrvQqlk6G0tud3HY/vOsfHdop9Pwv8cwJ3oplcVqTFQnlDoTqJWwXHCOAoLYUhufmYOOqzfze10tCIUdI4GEdpu2dou0LD/qX/uZePv+AD72gb1KW113w/Ew= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WqgPyQ5BxcfW4obDJJNXTwG/dNQ4BbppVED2gF4B8cgEBUQxsvbjgKFavD3SnLjz5nJBTazwGI1FeHOOkKtJb5rl10TvDuAFMC4e1GzHevfkChlFlC4MZsBhM4dm/YVq+qiUigxWk5Rb0xXep3kAZRv5K0bIuuV0i83vm018Huc= Received: by 10.114.80.4 with SMTP id d4mr4875422wab.1181512723754; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.37.10 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8d23ec860706101458r3c562086g5d05dffb479de1b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:58:43 -0400 From: Schiz0 To: "Bjorn Boulder" In-Reply-To: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:58:45 -0000 On 6/10/07, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > > > People, > > I need help with sendmail on my FreeBSD box running: > FreeBSD 5.3 > > Specifically, I need help using sendmail to send mail. > > I inherited this FreeBSD box from a guy who left for > another gig. > > The box appears to be stable. It's been up since Nov > 2006 > and is running a couple of simple web sites. > > The web sites work okay. > > We want to put up a 3rd site which needs to send mail > to people who register. > > I'm assuming that I need to get sendmail working. > > That is, I need it to send mail. > > It does not need to receive mail because we are using > google apps to receive all of our mail from the > outside. > > It was easy to setup: > > -Follow directions here: http://google.com/a/ > -Update the MX records for our domains > > When I try using sendmail I run this simple test: > > 1. create a text file, sendme.txt: > > From: bornboulder77@yahoo.com > Subject: test mail > Hi Bjorn > Bye Bjorn > > 2. Run shell command: > /usr/sbin/sendmail bornboulder77@yahoo.com < > sendme.txt > > Result: The mail is not delivered. > > I'd welcome any tips for configuring sendmail to send > mail. > > -b > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready > for the edge of your seat? > Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Also check /etc/rc.conf and /etc/defaults/rc.conf along with everything in /etc/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 22:46:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CB916A469 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mats@c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969CE13C483 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mats@c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se) Received: from c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se ([83.250.138.187]:55395 helo=cyborg.c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HxVwi-0005aT-7g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:31:40 +0200 Received: from cyborg.c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyborg.c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5AMV6cl000893 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from mats@localhost) by cyborg.c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5AMV6b5000892 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:31:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mats) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:31:06 +0200 From: Mats To: Bjorn Boulder Message-ID: <20070610223106.GA858@cyborg.c83-250-138-187.bredband.comhem.se> References: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <922630.70501.qm@web57510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Originating-IP: 83.250.138.187 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HxVwi-0005aT-7g. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HxVwi-0005aT-7g 78216b995bcf9ad81d5542892107616c Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:46:59 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:13:02PM -0700, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > > People, > > I need help with sendmail on my FreeBSD box running: > FreeBSD 5.3 > > Specifically, I need help using sendmail to send mail. > > I inherited this FreeBSD box from a guy who left for > another gig. > > The box appears to be stable. It's been up since Nov > 2006 > and is running a couple of simple web sites. > > The web sites work okay. > > We want to put up a 3rd site which needs to send mail > to people who register. > > I'm assuming that I need to get sendmail working. > > That is, I need it to send mail. > > It does not need to receive mail because we are using > google apps to receive all of our mail from the > outside. > > It was easy to setup: > > -Follow directions here: http://google.com/a/ > -Update the MX records for our domains > > When I try using sendmail I run this simple test: > > 1. create a text file, sendme.txt: > > From: bornboulder77@yahoo.com > Subject: test mail > Hi Bjorn > Bye Bjorn > > 2. Run shell command: > /usr/sbin/sendmail bornboulder77@yahoo.com < > sendme.txt > > Result: The mail is not delivered. > > I'd welcome any tips for configuring sendmail to send > mail. Is it so that you haven't set up your sendmail to deliver outside your network? You need to change some things in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf in that case. You probably have a qualyfied domainname? But before I write a long description how to do it, can you tell a little more? Does it deliver localy? /Mats From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 23:20:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA6E16A400 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A534013C44C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l5ANKJLr008701; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:20:20 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:20:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706110120.19636.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Angelin Lalev Subject: Re: passing parameters to configure script of a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:20:26 -0000 On Sunday 10 June 2007, Angelin Lalev wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build squid from ports, but I need to pass some custom options to > configure script. Something more, I want to be sure that when I run > portupdate it won't revert to default options. Which is the right way to do > this ? You can use something like this in make.conf: # insert your own leet matching pattern here CURRENT_PORT=${.CURDIR:C/.*ports\///} .if ${CURRENT_PORT} == "category/name" CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --some-option # you can also change things like CFLAGS here. .endif Some ports set CONFIGURE_ARGS explicitly, making the above not work. To work around this, set CONFIGURE_ARGS on the make command line. You can then add it to the MAKE_ARGS list in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf to make it work when upgrading using portupgrade. HTH, Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 00:54:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470E916A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CBA13C46A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9789651925 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:54:26 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070611015426.6d987b55@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <466C582A.8080002@netfence.it> References: <466C582A.8080002@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portsclean -L after X.org upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:54:32 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:59:38 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > As per subject, I get a lot of warning like the ones following: > > > ** /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 is shadowed by > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 > > /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 If you completed the upgrade by running the script mentioned in UPDATING, /usr/X11R6/lib/ and /usr/local/lib/ are the same directory. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 01:14:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D2516A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liuping.james@gmail.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F54D13C43E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liuping.james@gmail.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so1084753ika for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=VsV1gqNs9Y87SwTR1YMbIh+RIt0RW3lyThy6D6V7t/sx9ZVMkPzmE4eJ0g9738dsy1toC3Sn2O2PUWb6aWNX3Ola04d+M8nzksoc6S+IS+3ZfeJe/nLwvtR/D4T+zKaw5bb0WsLl/nOubBd5X9jawBxUb/XsjPSHW291CAGvCFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=c8JbXP5Hnr+zc4YxYTrnGn1arKSaPheIJyTfgu7gjqWECDGstbaE2voo7VR6FlkFSK7+q/3CHf9sYG+FjNp5Z0m9F80QqUoFE591dne4LVPuMvqHuzAvCQ8PjuhLnLVbmAi4UljHPVxI8px6L84aeQA2ILi6XxqQQ3u19oAfCoA= Received: by 10.78.190.10 with SMTP id n10mr1984606huf.1181522945560; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.160.15 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5d5204510706101749j593f54dbp689419d65a1b8942@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:49:05 +0800 From: "James liu" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD6: php.ini not find in phpinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:14:01 -0000 aSB1c2UgcG9ydHMgdG8gZGVmYXVsdCBzZXR1cC4uLgoKd2Vio7psaWdodHRwZAoKcGhwOiBwaHA1 K3BocDUtZXh0ZW5zaW9ucwoKCmNwIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvZXRjL3BocC5pbmktcmVjb21tZW5kZWQg L3Vzci9sb2NhbC9ldGMvcGhwLmluaQoKcmVzdGFydCBsaWdodHRwZCBhbmQgcGhwaW5mbyBkb24n dCBrbm93IHBocC5pbmkuCgpub3cgaSB3YW5uYSBjb25maWcgcGhwIG1vdWRlbCwgYnV0IGlmIG5v IHBocC5pbmksIGkgd2lsbCBkbyBub3RoaW5nLgoKYW55b25lIGtub3cgaG93IHRvIGxldCBwaHBp bmZvIGZpbmQgcGhwLmluaT8KCgotLSAKcmVnYXJkcwpqbAo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 01:41:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4944F16A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D587113C43E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so53521nfb for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:41:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hI6vlyUQEeQCMz7+D8thWbNjYhVTLIMZXElKOtAGXHjHlbKINOsEn7mDzODBaLA43rsg5vJJDcwQlntNBUJEouvd8CtalX7v2+jnu3ee4JUz1EF/MUSxgX9SvkX8wUZeU1xjRiLg9HbHmy0DkLtph8vJU9J+/DGK8HOZdZVDS80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kOMXGellmfCdZXPCPXQa7IW4W2JqO0v85hmjQlNPV6q5afsXBIE5QRqGXW7vmAyjN4X4XYHUfqs5gJd944YM4crr6b3fgcLKIdNKkNJQgVQw1qdVj8GpJhEp6iwwsmoMdMiXAUC3FOA6+rnjCBmkdsBQh94qOxZql0S7yLB2RPk= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr10002105buc.1181526104520; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:41:44 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706100121w3489f6b4m2f3ab62d33fda3eb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0706100121w3489f6b4m2f3ab62d33fda3eb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Stout Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:41:46 -0000 On 10/06/07, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > > So how should I fix this? > > > > Thank you, > > Mark Stout > > cd /usr/src > make cleanworld > mergemaster -p > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > reboot > > cd /usr/src > make installworld > mergemaster -iU > reboot > > You are done. :) Start with # rm -r /usr/obj/* -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 02:21:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8093F16A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.blowfish@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E5513C458 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g.blowfish@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so956047nzn for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qXIv76ZfI8gX/EwmpA0USwPPcWxoEQAcRfC0JciPLQL+ghIakVW4xt8q/OwiIoqD0HuOeGQZYZuo4w64NTPYR4waOUT5uPMj6rZPk8FTbt7+HKEeu53WHGHOzpl+ePZXQ9zhN/kTOFCslxv2+AAHBNzHdB7y0B5LrDuFH/hyTQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Z1SY5ZrENAw/0X9hM0xQMzQUx3wZP43s+Yn/x521+zSPMdGqVvmkCqbeCbpvUisK/79HfjM4qRa6RweBp5S0LpSpbxUIY/M6JoyarZXtte1U2cAdFm0rR1KQ56sx1R3upZSCe6R2GMkHuI95NOy7vQIE/bAnIx3CZatbPyG2fnI= Received: by 10.142.87.15 with SMTP id k15mr251661wfb.1181526847915; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.156.17 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:54:07 +0800 From: "goole blowfish" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:21:11 -0000 Dear friends, I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? Best Regards, FredZhang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 02:24:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0909316A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E884613C4BB for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30E41A4D91; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F50512C2; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 384F4BC90; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:24:12 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: goole blowfish Message-ID: <20070611022412.GA47135@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:24:15 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > > When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. > > > Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? Every version of FreeBD includes it in the ports collection. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 02:26:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F65C16A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFE413C455 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnslinky@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2418246pyi for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=gOtl1qerlAGLT28FESQps20gxMxx/qF6Ea1GPvns2xLN5h2NU318IP84KO/cEBe+5uMT8wUTlRehIYiy/2yfg2rnJ74sY+1rRHH80WqFd4eD5h8C64cEqWqlfrtN62F3zlnfGY/JwMY89uvoMrYpAq1hPHE6+c60fkqVb4pVyHw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=et1LoPiBs+MxrQAEdKhFuB31ud9sZd1z2td1E4IOZIFz2OZQ2iQNdx8CVxNSVyuJH6tzaJGa5fvQ+9Jl5PqpzwuxHEXS03RRmBvuigSvI+bMJ+N5JiIs96yklr7hrO6pOyMDB07d4VrW9lglvE1SiH/Xw7hoy9KL0LZQptkjm+w= Received: by 10.35.32.9 with SMTP id k9mr8348518pyj.1181528777720; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [209.240.66.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v56sm7272414pyh.2007.06.10.19.26.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:26:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> References: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7C611980-0FA3-4B0D-B9FB-72542B4BB1C1@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:26:13 -0500 To: goole blowfish X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:26:18 -0000 On Jun 10, 2007, at 8:54 PMJun 10, 2007, goole blowfish wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > > When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion > package. > > > Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? In a manner of speaking, yes. If you installed the ports tree during installation, simply perform the following commands when you're logged in as the root user: # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 # make install clean Follow any instructions you see on the screen at the end of the installation - you may need to scroll up a bit to catch them all. You can scroll up by pressing Scroll-Lock and then the up/down arrows. HTH Eric Crist From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 02:53:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4340516A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737CB13C45E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 76815 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 02:11:00 -0000 Received: from 62.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg (HELO ?192.168.1.106?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@210.193.15.62) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 02:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:26:39 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:53:15 -0000 Hi all, I'm using inetd + qmail to implement a mail server. The combo works, but usually sending a mail takes some 5-10 seconds. I suspect it's largely because inetd or qmail is trying to do some dns lookup or something, before letting it through. Is there any way to shorten this process - if possible eliminate it altogether? Some time back, there was an advice to avoid inetd. It's probably a good idea, but I hope to deal with this first before moving forward on the setup. Appreciate any advice. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 03:14:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBF816A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@web5.mdx.safepages.com) Received: from mail10.mdx.safepages.com (mail10.mdx.safepages.com [216.127.133.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EB013C46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@web5.mdx.safepages.com) Received: by mail10.mdx.safepages.com (Postfix, from userid 1012) id 02A312188E; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web5.mdx.safepages.com (unknown [216.127.154.240]) by mail10.mdx.safepages.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193CE25EB7 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: by web5.mdx.safepages.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 64F7A1EA1A1; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:45:54 +0000 (GMT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Microsoft Award Team MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20070611024554.64F7A1EA1A1@web5.mdx.safepages.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:45:54 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Ref: BTD/968/07{CONTACT WAYNE ANDERSON ASAP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: claims.awards070@yahoo.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:14:34 -0000 Microsoft Award Team Ref: BTD/968/07 Batch: 409978E Dear Lucky Winner, WINNING NOTIFICATION The prestigious Microsoft successfully organised a Sweepstakes marking the begining of the year's anniversary, The Management rolled out over 100,000.000.00 (One Hundred Million Great Britain Pounds) Participants for the draws were randomly selected and drawn from a wide range of web hosts which will be given the opportunity to benefit from year our patronage. The selection was made through an electronic computer draw system attaching personalised email addresses to ticket numbers.Microsoft is now the largest Internet company and in an effort to make sure that Internet Explorer remains the most widely used programme, Microsoft and MSN are running an e-mail beta test. Your email address as indicated was drawn and attached to ticket number 008795727498 with serial numbers BTD/9080648302/07 and drew the lucky numbers 14-21-25-39-40-47(20) which subsequently won you £1,000,000.00 (One Million Great Britain Pounds) as one of the jackpot winners in this draw. You have therefore won the entire winning sum of £1,000,000.00 (One Million Great Britain Pounds). The draws registered as Draw number one was conducted in Brockley, London United Kingdom on the 10th June 2007. These Draws are commemorative and as such special. Please be informed by this winning notification,to file your claims,you are to make contact with your designated agent who shall by duty guide you through the process to facilitate the release of your prize.To file for your claim Please Contact your fiduciary agent quickly Mr.Wayne Anderson Microsoft Promotion Award Team Head Winning Claims Dept. Email: claims.awards070@yahoo.co.uk Telephone: +44 701-112-1998 THIS FORM SHOULD BE CORRECTLY FILLED BY THE BENEFICIARY OF THE STATED FUND, FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE TRANSFER. BENEFICIARY FIRST NAME...................... BENEFICIARY LAST NAME...................... NATIONALITY................................... RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS......................... DATE OF BIRTH................................ SEX............................................... TEL. NUMBER.................................... FAX NUMBER..................................... EMAIL ADDRESS................................. AMOUNT WON................................... BATCH NUMBER.................................. REFERENCE NUMBER................................... OCCUPATION..................................... MARITAL STATUS............................... DECLARATION: I..........................................................HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE DATA ARE TRUE. THAT MY CLAIMS AGENT SHALL ACT AS A FACILITATOR IN THE TRANSFER OF THE TOTAL FUND TO ME. DATE........................................... (YOUR FULLNAMES)........................... Congratulations once again from the entire staff of the Microsoft Award Team. >From the Uk Board of Management Head Customercare Service Microsoft Promotion Team NB:Any claim not collected before fourteen (14) working days from dateof notification indicate the specified lucky winner has voluntarily forfeited his/her winnings. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 04:12:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0752116A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58BD413C484 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: (qmail 12094 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 04:42:37 -0000 Received: from 85233228239.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO workp4) (85.233.228.239) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 04:42:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:14:35 +0200 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070611061435.2b5cf796.coolzone@it.dk> In-Reply-To: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> References: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:12:15 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:54:07 +0800 "goole blowfish" wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > > When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. > > > Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? > Something tells me that you are used to OpenBSD? :-) Apache is not part of FreeBSD baseinstall. You have to install it via pkg_add or via the ports collection. FreeBSD has more than one version of Apache as well. > > > Best Regards, > FredZhang > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 04:25:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8426916A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0534F13C469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5B4PAE3091280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:25:10 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5B4P9nO041249; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:25:09 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:25:09 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706110425.l5B4P9nO041249@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: peter@placidpublishing.net In-reply-to: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> (message from Peter Pluta on Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT)) References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:25:12 -0000 > How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix, > amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that > shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything > useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with spamassassin. > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. RDL test are enabled in SA if you configure it in the local.cf configuration. My config file is in /etc/mail/spamassassin. I can find a lines saying: skip_rbl_checks 0 rbl_timeout 30 dns_available yes that means that I use RBL, and that I wait up to 30 seconds to get an answer. I don't remember about the 3rd line, but it could be related. Reason that your RBL rules are never triggered could be that the time out is too low or that you have disabled RBL checks. Or that when you received the spam, the sender was not yet listed. But was listed lated when you did the dnsstuff.com check. If I am not confused, the list of RBL configured in SA by default is quite short, you may find it usefull to add more RBL to SA. But you are faced with the risk of adding lists that are poorly managed and have a lot of false positive. Like mentionned bellow: > Or you can out and out block servers in the RBL from your MTA. You > probably want to be carefull with the latter technique since is > transfers onus of the work of delivering the mail into the wrong > hands. If you do RBL at the MTA level, you better be sure that the RBL you use are not polluted with false positives. I'd try to run the ugly spam through SA by hand (spamassassin -t ) and see what the output is. You'll see if the RBL are triggered or not. If you are new to SA, I woudl warn you against modifying the scores for RBL, unless you no what you are doing. SA scoring is a difficulte and delicate task and modifying the scores may result in unwanted situation. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 04:38:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D397816A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from n8a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com (n8a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C1DF13C45E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 04:26:00 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.131] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 04:26:00 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 04:26:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 39087.10323.bm@rrr2.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78201 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 04:25:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=NGC4MvaBcZ1JjYj1S579uQvGgOfp2vxKsfbQrlafdk4xTlN4NZTZRVqKIswmOluVrH/DIcqHfg++WbPXo/ADEANOajC6DlLznwFwZeoAz6cUv08OLMhpjYfHnEifsJvfpBXXDNs3XZrRf38Wv9C7XC5++5raRqr9Xl8VqD4PCng=; X-YMail-OSG: DM8XcacVM1mN6ThjFlQxIKTu5hBLaXJndtjvbZ3yHMXjaLYY1bCa7VIoBc1MOnDB1TjHZnn8H2FmVFAVhN28eKZc.ztKkDdBpqBZxDcqw9paMX26d5GUBg-- Received: from [76.211.254.121] by web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:54 PDT Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:38:39 -0000 Doug, Mats Your advice is on the money; thanks. I see this: Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: l5AAhekD015068: to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle (1004/1005), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30062, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests that I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf It appears that the box cannot send mail to itself: Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84ObZ014546: to=postmaster, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=154501, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: to=root, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=6+00:00:26, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=691450, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: l5A84Oba014546: sender notify: Cannot send message for 5 days Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84Oba014546: to=root, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=152806, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] Currently, my main assumption is that /etc/mail/sendmail.cf is the primary administrative interface for e-mail. I'll nose around via google. -b ____________________________________________________________________________________ No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 04:45:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0561916A46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A7513C448 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-109-147-73.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.147.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5B4je7T010791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:45:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) In-Reply-To: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4FF0C5BA-2DCC-4335-B340-9B0FA4393608@lafn.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:45:48 -0700 To: Bjorn Boulder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/3398/Sun Jun 10 08:08:42 2007 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:45:43 -0000 On Jun 10, 2007, at 21:25, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Doug, Mats > > Your advice is on the money; thanks. > > I see this: > > Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: l5AAhekD015068: > to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle > (1004/1005), > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=30062, > relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests that > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > It appears that the box cannot send mail to itself: > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84ObZ014546: > to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=154501, > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by > [127.0.0.1] > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: > to=root, > ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=6+00:00:26, xdelay=00:00:00, > mailer=relay, > pri=691450, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: > l5A84Oba014546: > sender notify: Cannot send message for 5 days > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84Oba014546: > to=root, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=152806, > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by > [127.0.0.1] > > Currently, my main assumption is that > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > is the primary administrative interface for e-mail. That is correct, but you don't want to directly mess with sendmail.cf. You really want to use the mc file and then make to build the cf file. Its much easier and more readable. See /usr/ share/sendmail/cf/readme for more details. The cf files are in another directory from there named cf. You will also want to use sendmail -bv email-address to have sendmail show you how and where it will deliver for the address: email-address. That is a useful tool. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:15:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E33B16A46D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from n2.bullet.mail.re4.yahoo.com (n2.bullet.mail.re4.yahoo.com [206.190.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61C4313C45A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n2.bullet.re4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:02:13 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.133] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:02:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr4.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:02:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 881606.66850.bm@rrr4.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 59965 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 05:02:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=fjM1ZPcdnCmHS07mnPkCVdcw76s4nP4avjIOJZg6Frwx+HK1wT9NyIq6oq8n35TvPctLYn19Y+tvyk90BnYorBYDix3Ux0vsNUXuFZPUSyIC4HxX1QpO8vdCjvViYp4mLFrdl22URcGDnTqA6XlR8Akd8Bw8Q5XH7l01Fa2JQQI=; X-YMail-OSG: y8UBO3IVM1kP2zWG8DN0eHin0YUkJ1kC_go1EXX8rLdKR0RNJeZjvWOyGchxRLU_5tOntQrGPXAoDVLfG6cgIdZl Received: from [76.211.254.121] by web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:02:13 PDT Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:02:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder To: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <4FF0C5BA-2DCC-4335-B340-9B0FA4393608@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <695341.59766.qm@web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:15:07 -0000 ok, I'll look at that readme. And.... I nosed around on the box for clues about sendmail.cf It looks like the previous sysadmin ignored sendmail.cf I see this: bash jake oracle /etc/mail 14 $ pwd /etc/mail bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ ls -latr total 582 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 569 Nov 4 2004 virtusertable.sample -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40449 Nov 4 2004 submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57796 Nov 4 2004 sendmail.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 243 Nov 4 2004 mailertable.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 400 Nov 4 2004 mailer.conf -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5588 Nov 4 2004 helpfile -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40449 Nov 4 2004 freebsd.submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57796 Nov 4 2004 freebsd.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1606 Nov 4 2004 aliases -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 407 Nov 4 2004 access.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2896 Nov 4 2004 README -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6809 Nov 4 2004 Makefile -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 65536 Oct 31 2005 aliases.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Aug 21 2006 motel411.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 40400 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57747 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.cf -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 894 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.submit.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4113 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.mc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 894 Aug 21 2006 freebsd.submit.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4113 Aug 21 2006 freebsd.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 52 Aug 21 2006 local-host-names -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 267 Aug 21 2006 virtusertable drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 21 2006 ./ -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 65536 Aug 21 2006 virtusertable.db drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 2048 Nov 11 2006 ../ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ It looks like administrative activity was happening on Aug 21 2006 I looked at motel411.sh... bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ cat motel411.sh #! /bin/sh cp freebsd.mc motel411.com.mc /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 motel411.com.mc > motel411.com.cf cp freebsd.submit.mc motel411.com.submit.mc /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 motel411.com.submit.mc > motel411.com.submit.cf /usr/sbin/makemap hash virtusertable.db < virtusertable chmod 0640 virtusertable.db bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ I'll search google for info about these files: freebsd.mc freebsd.submit.mc virtusertable virtusertable.db And I'll read that readme: /usr/share/sendmail/cf/readme -b --- Doug Hardie wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2007, at 21:25, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > > > Doug, Mats > > > > Your advice is on the money; thanks. > > > > I see this: > > > > Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: > l5AAhekD015068: > > to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle > > (1004/1005), > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=30062, > > relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > > stat=Deferred: Connection > > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > > > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests > that > > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > > > It appears that the box cannot send mail to > itself: > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5A84ObZ014546: > > to=postmaster, > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=154501, > > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > > Connection refused by > > [127.0.0.1] > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5485I55093939: > > to=root, > > ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=6+00:00:26, > xdelay=00:00:00, > > mailer=relay, > > pri=691450, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > > stat=Deferred: Connection > > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5485I55093939: > > l5A84Oba014546: > > sender notify: Cannot send message for 5 days > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5A84Oba014546: > > to=root, > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=152806, > > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > > Connection refused by > > [127.0.0.1] > > > > Currently, my main assumption is that > > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > is the primary administrative interface for > e-mail. > > That is correct, but you don't want to directly mess > with > sendmail.cf. You really want to use the mc file and > then make to > build the cf file. Its much easier and more > readable. See /usr/ > share/sendmail/cf/readme for more details. The cf > files are in > another directory from there named cf. > > You will also want to use > sendmail -bv email-address > to have sendmail show you how and where it will > deliver for the > address: email-address. That is a useful tool. > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:17:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ED716A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from n9a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com (n9a.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 181E113C44C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.237.89] by n9.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:17:45 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.132] by t5.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:17:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 05:17:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 586336.3311.bm@rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 14798 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 05:17:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=U3Xe86QMuO2tUa8M+bbgaHzK+H/D/WxbyXYnB7IlJdFSR2RdxXK9aaeZ3IQ5kRB0b60fOyrEqXoMq6hqXkEmlBW+g97xLwc/tOewRo/3rIRdgp59dTGDZbu4go/RCi3OJAeHHR94EJ7Yoq3ywJ6AIzXGxBffrP3OpNZd3soYfmQ=; X-YMail-OSG: r_lDYZoVM1kbl7H9gFnHXitwsSIA0xLtddygQSB.fjL02InkaqxAFV22Ys8x4wBVQQ-- Received: from [76.211.254.121] by web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:17:45 PDT Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:17:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:17:46 -0000 Well I checked this file: ll /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 183289 Nov 4 2004 /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README It's about 50 pages long. I'm worried that I'd miss something if I try to understand all of it. I need something more dumbed down. Here is what I want: 1. I want to send mail 2. I don't want to receive mail from the outside 3. I do want to receive mail from the box itself. Actually 3 is not a hard requirement. Help anyone? -b ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 07:56:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A312D16A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B113C43E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B97B81D; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:25:56 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at post.raad.tartu.ee Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlgnqTbCR7V5; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:25:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from raad.tartu.ee (lv.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.110]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28007B819; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:25:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from INFO/SpoolDir by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48); 11 Jun 07 10:25:54 +0300 Received: from SpoolDir by INFO (Mercury 1.48); 11 Jun 07 10:25:41 +0300 Received: from [172.26.1.3] (172.26.1.3) by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP; 11 Jun 07 10:25:40 +0300 Message-ID: <466CF8F3.9080605@raad.tartu.ee> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:25:39 +0300 From: Toomas Aas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Boulder References: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:56:03 -0000 Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Here is what I want: > > 1. I want to send mail > 2. I don't want to receive mail from the outside > 3. I do want to receive mail from the box itself. The default Sendmail configuration on FreeBSD should be sufficient for what you want to do. You just need to start Sendmail the right way. Make sure you have the following in /etc/rc.conf: sendmail_enable="NO" Then give this command: /etc/rc.d/sendmail start Now sendmail should start up, listening on loopback interface only. You can verify this with command: sockstat -4 Among the output you should see this line: root sendmail 562 4 tcp4 127.0.0.1:25 *:* Then try telnet localhost 25 and make sure you get connected. Additionally try telnet yourserver 25 from another host and make sure you don't get connected. I have one web server (FreeBSD 5.5) with sendmail set up this way. -- Toomas Aas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 07:57:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ECF16A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434C513C480 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so394896anc for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:57:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=KkI4tQZLIdKjhKyAqSqmf1hv/9HBNaeoGnQEHXUDZEa0wmYpDMZ9eeqrvCYJx/5jfTQ09MRWBqWMuGVXO8oF1WQrV0r2QM4bJJfSz/IvRWlOanTH/wb6Dp67Xicr3oRdr9n4Qvo1Jws3bDDhr9cB2eHFpQ+iI+6u7dgQypW9EE4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CQGPFeMdN1u4ntJcwvNc5y2OElGgIoeJuCbvTx1yvNARaCnwaRcHBn0ZfMqJ0ltkyns1JfSWrlviwSYvzcDXTDzOEeUr80/JyH5cRrWTod1qkF5I4SQAR57MiIPMQxYeV+CZSCk4GaY/S3i5zhlP5MU7fEzX0aPg5ZqgUCr+HnQ= Received: by 10.100.190.8 with SMTP id n8mr3129940anf.1181547158104; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.45.5 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <235b80000706110032v6696e9a2s1c68654f299ebc6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:32:37 +0300 From: "tethys ocean" To: FreeBSD_Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: tcp port error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:57:20 -0000 Hi all I have a big problem about SMTP port . I am using qmail. Our my server cant open smtp ports than it gives this error ## tail -f /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current @40000000466cfb8926b54f34 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8a27ee119c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8b29151cdc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8c2a50e0cc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8d2b7e0a74 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8e2ca8ee14 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8f2dd9fbd4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb902f0b7ec4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x any solutions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 08:29:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0543016A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (hermes-tres.uned.es [62.204.192.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE4613C48C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100DB9834D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stargate-1.unedbizkaia.es (ca6200-010-200-062-201.uned.es [10.200.62.201]) by hermes-tres.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55A398345 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 X-Face: 1Ap'j*2\*m:5K9|Z3(3hw}>e7y}bKl>WsTt:A%1stWDEm9`D?s("Bk-4(uS((PR|BJ|^+)=?utf-8?q?=0A=099rL=26=251*N1v57h=5E+/7=2E=5E?=<|jyu`lrfTXqiA5.*wrD0kx@J\Qbd[Ik3GF+av(g. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Subject: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:29:50 -0000 Hello I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 RAID controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller is supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem, the controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported by AMD64) Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 TB? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 09:27:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA17716A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A87D13C44B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 09:27:41 -0000 Received: from pD952EBAB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO core2duo.local) [217.82.235.171] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 11:27:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/QKxsRkPDQk/lRuCNYTr7r64tHLx9RfaYlk3JC/P OJy3iNt7mreI2K Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:27:34 +0200 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Enrique Ayesta Perojo Message-Id: <20070611112734.a3014ee1.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> References: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__11_Jun_2007_11_27_34_+0200_B.xXjSlhSi/0tcdX" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:27:43 -0000 --Signature=_Mon__11_Jun_2007_11_27_34_+0200_B.xXjSlhSi/0tcdX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote: > Hello >=20 > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 = RAID=20 > controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller i= s=20 > supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. >=20 > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte= ,=20 > then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find = the=20 > disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem,= the=20 > controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried= =20 > with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported b= y=20 > AMD64) >=20 > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger t= han 2=20 > TB? >=20 > Thanks A quick google search revealed this: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html Andreas --=20 GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 --Signature=_Mon__11_Jun_2007_11_27_34_+0200_B.xXjSlhSi/0tcdX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGbRWG8P3NNypXNWURAjaJAKCz2yNMG4742k1zW1qvyHLmPRLwxQCfXfch ilCvpIr/RT8BJFINkyrdLd4= =BhmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__11_Jun_2007_11_27_34_+0200_B.xXjSlhSi/0tcdX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 09:39:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ADE16A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A72B113C44C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bornboulder77@yahoo.com) Received: from [68.142.230.28] by n10.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 09:39:10 -0000 Received: from [66.196.101.132] by t1.bullet.re2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 09:39:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Jun 2007 09:39:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 177251.68132.bm@rrr3.mail.re1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 50273 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 09:39:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=4GJd7OdOHWL1kFFuaA9X4uy17hCwwQxBdRLwl/jiiYxCCqGx7YRXXYDjGRXVdvNHufx+azuC89yI2+k39vQX74r3ux63sHGUyDTaQiCpkdD3eqmotyK741CyELIfvq7ibij44CzBAHSpbxa2pY+1rdIHzbfr8w3nIZupU5kx1fw=; X-YMail-OSG: 2UtWJmkVM1mQkgf9FGggOA5zapaElOODrWVvWauS9ImqR8LWaE4fKrrbC.O2ql7HZlck9hO9ncn8qpMsO33bIY9sFv7kdLsDTCDQV_QpulY.rKkz6QrgBQ-- Received: from [76.211.254.121] by web57508.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:39:07 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:39:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <912525.50114.qm@web57508.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:39:11 -0000 People, I got sendmail working to send mail. I started with this: http://www.google.com/search?q=bsd+sendmail+configuration >From there I found 2 excellent links which answered all my questions: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html http://www.technoids.org/freebsdsendmailfaqs.html It's easy to configure sendmail so it is only a sender, not a receiver of mail: In /etc/rc.conf put this: sendmail_enable="NO" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO). And from the faq link this was useful since it told me how to start sendmail: 5. How do I start sendmail? # cd /etc/mail # make start 6. How do I stop sendmail? # cd /etc/mail # make stop After I started sendmail I waited a bit and then sure enough, I found the e-mail I was looking for in my yahoo account. -b ___________________________________________________________________________________ You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 10:07:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D0F16A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79B913C465 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.118]) by bay0-omc1-s20.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:07:16 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:07:16 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:10 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2007 10:07:16.0457 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A03DD90:01C7AC10] Subject: procmailrc configuration fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:16 -0000 THis is Dhanesh , Here I have to configure a .procmailrc file in order to control spams in the mail system I had a few mailing lists , and I can send mails to these lists from my personal mail id , in /etc/aliases tther is an entry for these lists as mylists : list1,list2,list3 etc but I have to block spams ,so I editted this entry as follows in /etc/aliases mylists:spamassassin and I executed #newaliases and in /home/spamassassin I created a file .procmailrc as follows (I changed the ownership as spamassassin:spamassassin to .procmailrc and chmod -R 777 to procmailrc ) # ee /home/spamassassin/.procmailrc :0 ^TOmylists { :0 c ! list1@mydomain :0 c ! list2@mydomain } But when ever I tried to send mails from my account to mylists@mydomain , its not delivering the mails to receipients (before configuring procmailrc its working fine but spams are coming along with this so I decided to use procmail rc ) I tried this alos I tried to configure the /usr/local/etc/procmailrc file also the same way , but its also not sending the mails to the receipients in the lists... tail /var/log/mailog tells that the messages forwarded to Maildir directory , all the mails are ther in /home/spamassassin/Maildir but its not deliverd to the client ids .. So let me request you to help me what mistake i made while doing this .Any suggestion will help me alot to solve this issue .. thanks in advance dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Get Married in 2007. Join Shaadi.com FREE! www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=mhottag From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 10:11:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEB316A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (hermes-tres.uned.es [62.204.192.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC33D13C469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eayesta@portugalete.uned.es) Received: from hermes-tres.uned.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75528982B6; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stargate-1.unedbizkaia.es (ca6200-010-200-062-201.uned.es [10.200.62.201]) by hermes-tres.uned.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4921598258; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> <20070611112734.a3014ee1.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20070611112734.a3014ee1.cyb.@gmx.net> X-Face: 1Ap'j*2\*m:5K9|Z3(3hw}>e7y}bKl>WsTt:A%1stWDEm9`D?s("Bk-4(uS((PR|BJ|^+)=?utf-8?q?=0A=099rL=26=251*N1v57h=5E+/7=2E=5E?=<|jyu`lrfTXqiA5.*wrD0kx@J\Qbd[Ik3GF+av(g. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706111211.37313.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:11:41 -0000 El Lunes, 11 de Junio de 2007 11:27, Andreas Rudisch escribi=F3: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 > > Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote: > > Hello > > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 > > RAID controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID > > controller is supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. > > > > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 > > Terabyte, then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it > > cannot find the disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then > > there is no problem, the controller detects the disk and i can install > > FreeBSD on it. I have tried with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has > > a Xeon processor supported by AMD64) > > > > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger > > than 2 TB? > > > > Thanks > > A quick google search revealed this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html > > > Andreas Yes, i knew that page, but as it seems that the project has been forgotten = for=20 quite a long time i thought there could be some other way to do it.. Thanks anyway From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:08:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED8616A46F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jayendran.j@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18F613C4DE for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jayendran.j@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so1054625nzn for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:08:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=EIP1T/SrTRuQuc1MjrNfvpnHbj7iAxAc+EnsjHRza1PMfF5WUWYER20ug4+M6Ooc4Q7z8C32zWdRp+7uTsM0k5/f9lD0xCkDxHlwqHw3nQJzPXr5mRrZ6DXgk/rV0ZjH91YecmkFrnnqPgalAXWJDHblYJN8aBVkIZl0HDangYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=DhgtBPK9lnOd8BI6QqfOCJGlCQPtEcMXqff3fTlp6uVaBz7ow7Wgica22ndqp/lyYaTuZN6iM537tcgV5m20NIUsC/yAUvjolLzg+K/3PTmn5a2dgxcBhwgNNckTKaOGKst4zVDytFRmTSf5OGdhQ41AK4vR2ssPDX8GCnnB844= Received: by 10.114.27.20 with SMTP id a20mr5408798waa.1181562133755; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.59.9 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5b9645f30706110442s18e2a1d6wc7368db193630dbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:12:13 +0530 From: Jayendran To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Source code tar ball for the 6.2 production release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:08:28 -0000 Hi, I downloaded all the 6.2 release ISO images for the i386 target. I was unable to find the source code in any of the archives. I went through the FAQs which did not shed light on the location. I found a 'Documentation' links on the home site which had a link to a web browse-able version of the source code. Is the source code not bundled along with the ISO image(s) [earlier this used to be in /usr/src after installation]? If so, is it possible to get a tarball of it for offline use? I have not installed the OS yet. Thanks in advance, Jayendran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:17:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87B116A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4277013C44B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BCH0hZ093758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:01 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466D3D3C.20204@webanoide.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:17:00 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jayendran References: <5b9645f30706110442s18e2a1d6wc7368db193630dbb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5b9645f30706110442s18e2a1d6wc7368db193630dbb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Source code tar ball for the 6.2 production release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:17:03 -0000 Jayendran wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded all the 6.2 release ISO images for the i386 target. I was > unable to find the source code in any of the archives. I went through the > FAQs which did not shed light on the location. I found a 'Documentation' > links on the home site which had a link to a web browse-able version of the > source code. > > Is the source code not bundled along with the ISO image(s) [earlier this > used to be in /usr/src after installation]? If so, is it possible to get a > tarball of it for offline use? I have not installed the OS yet. /cdrom/6.2-RELEASE/src/ -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:30:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CBF16A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmalowsky@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BF613C465 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmalowsky@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1656336uge for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:30:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fg9yzMKG9nUW1UOUB/JzD6GrO1KtsN1bPI2JEdhVEuQomPwkCq5Qh5fO9XalaVkpqWtd3d0/UTPBYlkmXkhtk687RB0z7wCjaWhgpEVw3GkAhLC92dXviI86eZhjiT2bQWRueanP7ILRbJet3K656IGhabQDotY99cmTidWaBY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pE3aPP+cSyt3+TUOa8eOxJaG4Duw5DAI2zmfShAMPREBH6BHGxGOkA/jAxdnQSQ3MIaVy2uArP0cVJ2/wwf3V51DGlZrCv2ElmVPlukHQroupFqaaPZHIzeXCXRxYboo3gFba10vDTHe4l9ij2m/XLmLAKxAsHl5wL1E8DkXQos= Received: by 10.67.97.18 with SMTP id z18mr5067870ugl.1181563545120; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.108.27? ( [62.245.145.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v58sm3584188ugv.2007.06.11.05.05.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466D3A9D.5050907@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:05:49 +0200 From: Axel Schmalowsky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Exim stops working and nothing is logged ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:30:15 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to get Exim running on my newly installed freebsd system. So far, it works fine, but for no reason, the exim process(es) stop(s). At least, I cannot figure out why exim stopped working. Exim is configured to work with SpamAssassin and MySQL. Both, SA and MySQL processes run smoothly. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Best regards Axel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:32:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1F216A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from svarun.infrax.si (84-255-241-13.static.dsl.t-2.net [84.255.241.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B66513C447 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD994DA844 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:08:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from svarun.infrax.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Svarun.infrax.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23266-07 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.15.2] (unknown [192.168.15.2]) by svarun.infrax.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8441DA894 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466D3B1E.5090301@skoberne.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:07:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nejc_=A9koberne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at infrax.si Subject: NetMos NM9805 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:32:38 -0000 Hello, I have FreeBSD 6.2 system with MosChip NM9805 card (additional parallel port): puc0@pci7:4:0: class=0x078000 card=0x00101000 chip=0x98059710 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'MosChip Semiconductors (Was: Netmos Technology)' device = 'Nm9805 Parallel Port Adapter' class = simple comms I have enabled the 'puc' driver in loader.conf and at boot, I can see this: puc0: port 0x1010-0x1017,0x1018-0x101f, 0x1020-0x1027,0x1028-0x102f,0x1030-0x1037,0x1000-0x100f irq 20 at device 4.0 on pci7 However, it seems that the puc driver doesn't glue the port with the ppc subsystem, because I can only see ppc lines for the built-in parallel port: ppc1: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77d irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc1: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc1: FIFO with 16/16/13 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc1 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 So the question is: how can I use my NetMos card with FreeBSD? Thanks, Nejc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:40:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACDC16A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E940E13C45B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (c-69-249-95-230.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [69.249.95.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5BCeATn044017 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:40:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5BCe5YL017661 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:40:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l5BCe5Ip017660 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:40:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200706111240.l5BCe5Ip017660@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:40:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ata1 probe causes lockup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:40:12 -0000 Hi, Having a problem installing 5.5 on a Toshiba 2805-S301 laptop. (I *HAVE* to load 5.5 on it for various reasons). I can load 5.4 perfectly, but as soon as I go to 5.5, the kernel won't boot. If I boot in 5.4 with verbose, I get Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: port 0xfff0-0xffff,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 5.1 on pci0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xfff0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x1f0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 at 0x3f6 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata0: [MPSAFE] Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0x170 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x1c type 4 at 0x376 (5.5 STOPS HERE) Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1-master: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: reset tp2 stat0=00 stat1=00 devices=0xc Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: ata1: [MPSAFE] Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 5.2 on pci0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: Reserved 0x20 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xff80 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: usb0: on uhci0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Jun 10 12:12:18 gevjon kernel: pci0: at device 5.3 (no driver attached) Any idea how to get 5.5 to get past that "atapci0: Reserved" part? Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:42:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB8516A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) Received: from coke.conundrum.com (coke.conundrum.com [216.235.9.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0864213C45A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) Received: from [216.235.13.82] ([216.235.13.82]) by coke.conundrum.com (8.13.1/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5BDScol044703; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:28:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1ACC527A-E8B3-42C6-9F71-F10B0B6F77A4@conundrum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Pounsett Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:28:26 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: rc.d NETWORKING dependancy not waiting for network to be up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:08 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It looks like the NETWORKING dummy dependancy doesn't actually cause the its dependants to wait for networking to be up, but simply for interfaces to be configured. I'm wondering if this is actually intended, or if it's an unavoidable design flaw, or what? I'm noting on my systems that ntpdate and ntpd are trying to start before the network is actually reachable, and therefore both have issues starting. ntpdate is unable to sync the clock properly before ntpd starts, and ntpd doesn't seem to ever be able to sync to a time server if it starts trying to contact one before the network is fully up... and needs to be restarted after boot in order for it to work properly. I'm working around the issue by sticking a 20 second delay into /etc/ rc.d/NETWORKING (this is probably way more than necessary, but I'm allowing for a large margin of error) which seems to fix my problem, but is obviously not ideal. Any background or suggestions related to this from anyone? Thanks, Matt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGbU39ae4z2vjbC8sRAgq9AJ46G/zvz4W4kCBTSdxdoC85ZUW4nwCg0iLX EW4HDKBsWEMw8LT4EPmnwnY= =wExI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:42:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84D216A48F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from S.Lichtenstern@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CA9D13C469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from S.Lichtenstern@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 13:16:15 -0000 Received: from p5B127DF1.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [10.55.0.3]) [91.18.125.241] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 15:16:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #13037404 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Y+2UmygiY48M/ADxKayhEbuncPmFxI4298etYxc /1U+a/dIj2LL8t From: Stefan Lichtenstern To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-15 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:16:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1181567764.1472.3.camel@Adelina.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Problem with atapicam on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 causes system-freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: S.Lichtenstern@gmx.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:42:56 -0000 Hi all, I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5, with the standard SMP kernel found in / usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SMP, when i 'kldload atapicam' i get the following error message which just makes no sense to me: WARNING - PREVENT_ALLOW taskqueue timeout - completing request directly xptioctl: put device pass0 in your kernel config file xptioctl: pass driver is not in the kernel Right after I get this error message, it starts repeating again and again, and the system is no more useable. Then I installed the normal GENERIC kernel without SMP support, and the same thing happens, same error message. Then i tried to compile "device atapicam" directly into the kernel, which makes the system hang at boot time, while recognizing the cdrom. The standard SMP kernel "includes" the GENERIC kernel in which the line "device pass" can be found, that means pass must be allready in the kernel. Please have a look at the output from dmesg and kldstat -v here (link) http://nopaste.info/52ef292281.html I searched the web for similar error messages, and found a message pointing this problem to hald, so i disabled hald to see if that chances anything. And it did, while 'kldload atapicam' i'm not getting the above error message anymore, but 'camcontrol devlist' doesnt show anything and cdrecord -scanbus ends up in the following errormessage: Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jÿffffÿffffrg Schilling cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. I checked with 'kldstat', and it showed atapicam. Since my mainboard has just one ide port onboard(rest is S-ATA), i have to use a pcie ide-controller "Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20268 (Ultra100 TX2)" on which my dvdwriter(acd0) is connected to. Any help or suggestion is really appreciated. Thanks in advance, greeting Stefan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:51:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF3216A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail01.ifxnetworks.com (mail01.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F73B13C44C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 24823 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 13:51:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ifxnw.cl) ([190.61.128.23]) (envelope-sender ) by mail01.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 13:51:05 -0000 Received: from 64.117.137.69 (proxying for 161.131.179.195, 161.131.179.195) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmw@unete.cl) by webmail.ifxnw.cl with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:51:05 -0400 (CLT) Message-ID: <38511.64.117.137.69.1181569865.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:51:05 -0400 (CLT) From: "Daniel Molina Wegener" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: booting from two hard drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:51:08 -0000 Hello, I've installed 6.2-STABLE in the first harddrive and 7.0-CURRENT on the second hard drive. Easy Boot is installed in both hard drives, and I get the boot menu for both hard drives -- using the -STABLE boot loader -- but I get the message "Invalid partition" when I try to boot from -CURRENT, the second disk. What is my mistake? Thanks in advance... -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer ..O | dmw [at] unete [dot] cl | FOSS Coding Adict OOO | BSD & Linux User | Standards Rocks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:08:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBF816A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoskinsjohn@mac.com) Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net (sccrmhc15.comcast.net [204.127.200.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7228813C48A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoskinsjohn@mac.com) Received: from [10.0.1.200] (c-76-26-43-14.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[76.26.43.14]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTP id <2007061113583401500dqpq7e>; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:58:34 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: From: John Hoskins Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:57:22 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: The FreeBSD Diary -- Is your ISP blocking port 25? Here's a Postfix solution. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:08:38 -0000 I need to get ion touch with the person who posted the article: I have a serious problem, and I need help. The FreeBSD Diary (TM)=09 Providing practical examples since 1998 [ HOME | TOPICS | INDEX | WEB RESOURCES | BOOKS | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH =20= | FEEDBACK | FAQ | FORUMS ] Is your ISP blocking port 25? Here's a Postfix solution.10 February 2006 Need more help on this topic? Click here This article has 7 comments Show me similar articles My ISP started blocking incoming port 25. It's already blocking =20 outgoing port 25 and I'm handling that. Now it's time to start =20 accepting incoming mail on the submission port, 587. They aren't =20 blocking my incoming port 25. But we went through this process for =20 another guy on our computer, so I figured that this is a good thing =20 for which it will pay to be pro active. This solution assumes you have a mail server at home and at least one =20= other mail server out there on the Internet, one which does not have =20 port 25 blocked. That part is crucial to this solution. It is the =20 external server[s] that will accept incoming mail and forward it to =20 you. In DNS terms, your MX records will not point to your home =20 server, but to your public server. Your home mail server I started by adding the following line to /usr/local/etc/postfix/=20 master.cf on my Postfix mail server at home: 10.34.0.1:587 inet n - n - - smtpd where 10.34.0.1 is the public IP address of my mail server [no, =20 that's not really my IP address]. This instructs Postfix to listen on =20= that IP address on port 587. This is known as the submission port: $ grep 587 /etc/services submission 587/tcp submission 587/udp Your public mail server Then I added this to /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf on my public mail =20= server: transport_maps =3D hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix-config/transport This tells Postfix to observe the transport directives in the above =20 mentioned file. You can put the file whereever you want. I like to =20 keep it in that directory, which you'll probably have to create =20 because it's not part of the standard system. In /usr/local/etc/=20 postfix-config/transport I have: myserver.example.org smtp:[myserver.example.org]:587 Where myserver.example.org is the hostname of my mail server at home. =20= You need to create a .db file to go with that. I issued these commands: cd /usr/local/etc/postfix-config postmap transport You should now see a transport.db file. After making these changes =20 you should restart postfix: postix restart Testing Then I sent a test message from the public mail server $ echo 'test' | mail me@myserver.example.org I confirmed that it was coming in on port 587 with this command on my =20= mail server at home: tcpdump -i fxp0 port 587 Where fxp0 is the outside NIC on my firewall (the one with IP =20 10.34.0.1) as shown above. Then, on the public mail server, I requeued all the messages, so =20 they'd use the right transport: postsuper -r ALL It's magic! All the messages were delivered to the right spot. Controlling access I control access to port 587 on my mail server. I have firewall rules =20= in place that allow connections only from my home server. I think =20 there are no security risks involved in keeping it open, but I see no =20= reason to give access where no access is required. What about the other way around? If you need to handle outgoing port 25 to avoid ISP blocks, you can =20 always the same instructions, but in the reverse direction. It should =20= just work. Like the website? Want to give back? Please visit my wish list! Need more help on this topic? Click here This article has 7 comments Show me similar articles [ HOME | TOPICS | INDEX | WEB RESOURCES | BOOKS | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH =20= | FEEDBACK | FAQ | FORUMS ] Servers and bandwidth provided by New York Internet and SuperNews =20 Valid HTML, CSS , and RSS. Copyright =A9 1997-2007 DVL Software Ltd. All rights reserved. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:10:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358EB16A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com (a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com [64.72.68.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076A713C487 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.bsdwebsolutions.com ([64.72.68.15]) by a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD Web Solutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HxkbG-0006nz-3v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:10:30 -0400 Received: from [64.72.66.117] (helo=mail.poughkeepsieschools.org) by mail.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HxkbF-000HNY-S5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:10:29 -0400 Received: from [10.20.0.10] (port=60807 helo=macpro-pcsd.techcentral.local) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1HxkbF-000ICn-Lo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:10:29 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.90.2/3399 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: <466D57D5.4020803@poughkeepsieschools.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:10:29 -0400 From: "B. Cook" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Confused about dhclient .conf and -script.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:10:31 -0000 I am trying to make a FreeBSD machine that gets a dynamic ip from a pfsense box work the same way as a Windows machine does. After reading way more about isc-dhcpd than I wanted to, I found out that I can customize /etc/dhclient.conf (great). I found a great dhclient.conf but it seemed to do things that I could not get my FreeBSD box(es) to do. So I found out that this config file actually came from a linux box (some ubuntu version) and that it runs a dhclient-script which I then found out that FreeBSD also has.. So I'm closer but not there yet and can not seem to figure out what I am missing. This is my /etc/dhclient.conf : send host-name "$HOSTNAME"; request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers, domain-name, domain-name-servers, host-name, netbios-name-servers, netbios-scope; timeout 30; script "/sbin/dhclient-script"; the dhclient-script is the stock one (6.2-p5) the linux one had the host-name set to "" after looking at the dhclient-script it looks like I need to use $HOSTNAME. Except when I change the hostname of the box (via hostname -s blahblah.local.domain) and then run dig against the dns server, the name blahblah did not register. Jun 11 09:47:11 pfsense dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.1.13 to 00:b0:d0:a1:8f:17 ($HOSTNAME) via dc0 Jun 11 09:47:13 pfsense dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.13 from 00:b0:d0:a1:8f:17 ($HOSTNAME) via dc0 So what am I doing wrong, can I get what I am looking for? doing this: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:12:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C861816A479 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: from web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.125.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 746B913C457 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 76396 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 13:45:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=4cHmY9ixB2WdK7k/T8OXrn5jWAxofZ7yNF/5hTFChR9goBOgLETX2xNbWyNrO+Txmi7cTMANagn/cErnv1NzP5i/iHQeq9tVFtdTvnA/CDTqFCpDvJhZagF6VE7xiPmPUDuLPYmL8iuW+owhVQZlFYSAh5ykaj/QR3f2VyUqeLk=; X-YMail-OSG: bvqmojUVM1nCamOH3ryh2RZctvCC11NssHIvQ5fQGhdD8XxzpMprbZyLw6Cq5PwPUFJw.N4_x7PZTYp5YKCf.XJSzqf_zIqBgYho Received: from [65.217.255.2] by web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:45:50 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:45:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Harriet Severino To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <118509.76361.qm@web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:12:43 -0000 Hi, I am getting an error message, and do not know how to fix the problem. I have a new Intel Celeron laptop, and want to run FreeBSD on it. I chose the standard installation for user + Xwindows. After teh insytallation I configured Xorg, by section 5 of the documantation. The test worked, and I made no changes to the config files. $ uname -a FreeBSD severino.home 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu: /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i385 The error message comes when I boot the machine, as the login prompt appears. the Xorg has not started, I have a console login prompt. Error Message: Jun 10 12:09:33 severino init: getty repeating too quickly on port /dev/ttyv8, sleeping 30 secs. This message repeats about once every 30 seconds. Please tell me how to fix this, or where to get the infomation on how to fix this. Thank you for your time and attention H Severino ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:14:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F43616A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: from web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.125.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BECB13C45D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 40942 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 13:46:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=LsKBgyu2fyo0117fXaTV1OHMbw/GMOIeXKWFmxRFFwlikUGIk0JtvntMe6hZesqwQ/VS8QSH2DA4b9xJxjLme0SEckddE69mtE6flZ+JHthWCITLaotqyJjeJv7MagrALpzdrGVSOka5FEdpwPraaWqt/8WdtSu9x/CXXotlLgk=; X-YMail-OSG: U7daaCYVM1mv2uyiO25OXNM7OK_TIMHoMqP1osCJCGKFShfVN61ikC7jK6I484rVtzHwuO5tNGV4OLbPvwBLKQMcubDTtZFgIp33Z9SlTNAPfgSVuxoAxN.wfDQ71g-- Received: from [65.217.255.2] by web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:46:09 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Harriet Severino To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <505018.39495.qm@web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:14:49 -0000 Hi, I am getting an error message, and do not know how to fix the problem. I have a new Intel Celeron laptop, and want to run FreeBSD on it. I chose the standard installation for user + Xwindows. After teh insytallation I configured Xorg, by section 5 of the documantation. The test worked, and I made no changes to the config files. $ uname -a FreeBSD severino.home 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu: /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i385 The error message comes when I boot the machine, as the login prompt appears. the Xorg has not started, I have a console login prompt. Error Message: Jun 10 12:09:33 severino init: getty repeating too quickly on port /dev/ttyv8, sleeping 30 secs. This message repeats about once every 30 seconds. Please tell me how to fix this, or where to get the infomation on how to fix this. Thank you for your time and attention H Severino ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:31:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C97C16A46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F6013C448 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.255.86]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BEdhrr072463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:39:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BEV38Q022522; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:31:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <466D5C92.6040906@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:30:42 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <466C582A.8080002@netfence.it> <20070611015426.6d987b55@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070611015426.6d987b55@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsclean -L after X.org upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:31:02 -0000 RW wrote: >> As per subject, I get a lot of warning like the ones following: >> >>> ** /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 is shadowed by >>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 >>> /usr/X11R6/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 >>> /usr/local/lib/libI810XvMC.so.1 <- xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 > > If you completed the upgrade by running the script mentioned in > UPDATING, Yes, I did. > /usr/X11R6/lib/ and /usr/local/lib/ are the same directory. Yes, I know. So... Is portsclean a bit behind? Should it be updated? Should I live with this? I'm planning to run libchk and get rid of old .so. Is this ok or would it be harmful due to the above? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:38:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A06416A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D695213C458 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5BEXUQP002256; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:33:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5BEXU5b002255; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:33:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:33:30 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: goole blowfish Message-ID: <20070611143330.GE2028@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:38:27 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > > When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. > > > Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? First, learn about the FreeBSD ports system from the online handbook or other documentation or books about FreeBSD. Then, go to /usr/local/ports/www/apache22 type make make install You might also want to run a make configure before the first make but I used the defaults and didn't need to. After you do the make install, then edit the /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf file to set up your web site[s] configuration[s]. Finally, go to /usr/local/etc/rc.d and make sure apache22.sh has execute permission. (in the most recent versions it might not have the '.sh' on it). Then Apache will start at boot. You can manually start it with 'apachectl start' or stop it with 'apachectl stop' Note, that in FreeBSD almost everything beyond the basic OS is in the ports and generally can be installed by doing a make make install. ////jerry > > Best Regards, > FredZhang > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:46:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F3D16A46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A48813C4AE for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5BEfHLE002287; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:41:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5BEfHjq002286; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:41:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:41:17 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: goole blowfish Message-ID: <20070611144117.GF2028@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e8337620706101854r52b62e80nc4103f9ba94fe5ca@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:14 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:54:07AM +0800, goole blowfish wrote: > Dear friends, > > I have download the freebsd FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. > > When I install, I can't find the apache package in this installtion package. > > > Does any verson of Freebsd includes the apache package? One more thing that can be helpful, since a lot of stuff can scroll up the screen when doing a build and install, you might want to use script(1) to make a record of it you can go back and look at for any error messages or additional instructions. Basically type: script /tmp/apache.build (Any file name will do for apache.build) [make configure] if needed make make install make clean if you want exit (or CTRO-D is your shell is Bourne style, FreeBSD uses csh/tcsh) ////jerry > > > > > Best Regards, > FredZhang > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:56:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DF116A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D546A13C45D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: (qmail 7337 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 14:59:58 -0000 Received: from 85233228239.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO workp4) (85.233.228.239) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 14:59:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:31:45 +0200 From: Rico Secada To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070611163145.226c521e.coolzone@it.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:56:03 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Harriet Severino wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting an error message, and do not know how to fix the problem. > I have a new Intel Celeron laptop, and want to run FreeBSD on it. I > chose the standard installation for user + Xwindows. After teh > insytallation I configured Xorg, by section 5 of the documantation. The > test worked, and I made no changes to the config files. > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD severino.home 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 > 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu: > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i385 > > The error message comes when I boot the machine, as the login prompt > appears. the Xorg has not started, I have a console login prompt. Error > Message: > > Jun 10 12:09:33 severino init: getty repeating too quickly on port > /dev/ttyv8, sleeping 30 secs. > > This message repeats about once every 30 seconds. > > Please tell me how to fix this, or where to get the infomation on how > to fix this. X is misconfigured and it exits back to the console. If you use xdm/kdm/gdm, it will restart X. This throws you into a loop that makes the machine unusable, since you can't access the console because it's trying to switch into graphics mode all the time. Getty detects this, and freezes the console that created this for 30 secs, which gives you a chance to log in through the console and fix whatever error you have. You should check your Xorg configuration. Best regards > Thank you for your time and attention > > H Severino > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:02:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D863416A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank.wissmann41@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de (fmmailgate01.web.de [217.72.192.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0EC13C455 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank.wissmann41@web.de) Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B79388D47E1; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:37:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.138.254.43] (helo=[192.168.2.2]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.108 #197) id 1Hxl1W-0003w4-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:37:38 +0200 Message-ID: <466D5E80.2000605@web.de> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:38:56 +0200 From: Frank Wissmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20070606 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harriet Severino References: <118509.76361.qm@web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <118509.76361.qm@web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: frank.wissmann41@web.de X-Sender: frank.wissmann41@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19R2H6yTmr3evjSMK/dHnQbWrjN/rGpcSjD8qzd BLkhHZgKoh/2sHGo1fQ6nzIdY8SDY9mXPqCNIZrOjChxyHjHUt iCX7LfiXgPZCpUHanvNA== Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:09 -0000 It may be that you configured securelevel on startup. Try with "sysctl kern.securelevel" to find out which is your securelevel. It may be 1 or greater. Then try to change it either with sysinstall or directly at the command prompt with "sysctl -w kern.securelevel=-1". This should work. Greetings Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:02:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25F816A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-5.eunet.yu (smtpclu-5.eunet.yu [194.247.192.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA613C46A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-232-193.eunet.yu [213.198.232.193]) by smtpclu-5.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5BF2Rkd023740; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:02:30 +0200 Message-Id: <200706111502.l5BF2Rkd023740@smtpclu-5.eunet.yu> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:02:32 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Harriet Severino In-Reply-To: <505018.39495.qm@web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <505018.39495.qm@web38804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_05,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -1.1 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:02:46 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Harriet Severino wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I am getting an error message, and do not know how to fix the problem. > I have a new Intel Celeron laptop, and want to run FreeBSD on it. I > chose the standard installation for user + Xwindows. After teh > insytallation I configured Xorg, by section 5 of the documantation. > The test worked, and I made no changes to the config files. >=20 > $ uname -a > FreeBSD severino.home 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 > 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu: > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i385 >=20 > The error message comes when I boot the machine, as the login prompt > appears. the Xorg has not started, I have a console login prompt. > Error Message: >=20 > Jun 10 12:09:33 severino init: getty repeating too quickly on port > /dev/ttyv8, sleeping 30 secs. >=20 > This message repeats about once every 30 seconds. >=20 > Please tell me how to fix this, or where to get the infomation on how > to fix this. Hello Harriet, Have you made any changes to /etc/ttys, and what does it say about ttyv8? Have you maybe tried to configure kdm? Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:15:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41BC16A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D159013C447 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1169 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 15:15:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 15:15:52 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5083C28440; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:15:51 -0400 (EDT) To: Enrique Ayesta Perojo References: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:15:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> (Enrique Ayesta Perojo's message of "Mon\, 11 Jun 2007 10\:13\:04 +0200") Message-ID: <44vedufro8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:15:53 -0000 Enrique Ayesta Perojo writes: > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 RAID > controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller is > supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. > > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, > then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the > disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem, the > controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried > with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported by > AMD64) > > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 > TB? Well, the installer can't handle it, at any rate. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:16:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29F316A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (firewall.studsvik-analytic.com [155.212.59.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EB913C447 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pc245.studsvik-analytic.com [192.168.169.245]) by bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id l5BFuu2l023062 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466D7322.1080602@studsvik.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:06:58 -0400 From: Patrick Baldwin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46682C53.8060505@studsvikscandpower.com> <200706080217.l582Hk1f088594@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200706080217.l582Hk1f088594@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Best way to add SSL to Apache 1.3.37 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:09 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: [snip] >>configuration? If both options are possible, is one better than the >>other? I'd prefer not to have to re-do my apache install, but if >>there's some compelling reason I should, I'm interested in knowing it. > > > You would have to modify the httpd.conf to activate SSL anyway. > > Have you a lot of things in the config yet? Just what I needed to get our webmail server running. Initially tried Horde, but ended up running into some problems with that, now trying Squirrelmail. >>Also, when I've got it, I want users to have the option to use it, >>not be forced to (tinkering with a Squirrelmail webmail server here), so >>any information on that would be more than welcome. > > > Any reason why you don't want to force your user to go SSL. They will > be exchanging password over the network, better it is crypted, don't > you think? Yes, absolutely, that's why I want the option to use SSL. However, we have some users that travel a lot, and sometime they absolutely need to be able to get to their email. SSL introduces another layer of complexity, and thus possibility for failure, into checking their email. While I prefer the security of SSL, if it's a choice between no email access for our travellers and access without SSL, my boss has been pretty clear that access, however it's achieved, is the key issue. > If it is a matter of not purchasing a certificate, you can put up a > page on the way to install the certificate once for all so the users > are not requested again to accept the certificate. While that's not really the issue for me, I'm interested in this idea anyway, as it saves some money and keeps us a little more self sufficient. If you'd care to explain this in further detail, or just point me at a doc somewhere that does, it would be much appreciated. > Usual configuration of Apache normally allows you to set-up two > servers, one on port 80 that is not crypted and one on port 443 that > is using SSL. Both services can share the same web pages, giving acces > both with and without SSL. I guess now I need to hit Google and find out how to do this on FreeBSD, as it sounds just like what I want, thanks! Regards, -- Patrick Baldwin Systems Administrator Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. 1087 Beacon St. Newton, MA 02459 1-617-965-7455 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:16:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD4616A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (firewall.studsvik-analytic.com [155.212.59.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADF113C44C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Patrick.Baldwin@studsvik.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pc245.studsvik-analytic.com [192.168.169.245]) by bostonserver.studsvik-analytic.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id l5BFm82l022801 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:48:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466D7112.5060304@studsvik.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:58:10 -0400 From: Patrick Baldwin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46682C53.8060505@studsvikscandpower.com> <20070608110303.49a9a605@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070608110303.49a9a605@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Best way to add SSL to Apache 1.3.37 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:16:10 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:03:31 -0400 > Patrick Baldwin wrote: > > >>Hi, I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p4, and Apache 1.3.37. I'd like to >>add SSL support, but I'm not sure of the best way to go about it. >> > > > may I ask why are you using Apache 1.3.x ? I think Apache 2 has shown itself to > be pretty good and reliable by now Using 1.3.x because I'm trying to set up a webmail server, and most of the docs I could find were written with 1.3.x in mind. Also, I'm more familiar with 1.3.x >>In: >> >>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-apache.html >> >>Specifically section 27.7.5.1, it mentions you can add ssl support with >>mod_ssl, but I don't see it in my ports tree. >> >>I also found this: >>http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/webserver/apache_ssl_php_mysql.php >> >>Which seems to suggest that I'd need to have installed the apache >>port /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl instead of the package apache-1.3.37_3. > > > Indeed. > > >> >>So, do I need to remove the apache-1.3.37_3 package (presumably with >>pkg_delete, as I think that's the cleanest way, please correct me if I'm >>wrong), > > > pkg_deinstall apache-1.3* Excellent, thanks. I hadn't seen pkg_deinstall before, but checking out the man page seems to suggest I really should have been using it instead of pkg_delete; understanding wildcards and being able to recurse through dependencies seems very helpful. >> and re-install from the apache13-modssl port, or is there in >>fact some way to just get mod_ssl and add to my existing Apache >>configuration? > > > There may be, i haven't touched the 1.3 apache stuff for several years. If you > install www/apache22, it builds the SSL components by default. > > >>If both options are possible, is one better than the >>other? > > > You cannot have, by default (ie, withouth tinkering and knowing what you are > doing) both apache13 and apache13-mod_ssl. they are listed conflicts.( in the > Makefile for the port, search for the CONFLICTS line) > OK, I saw that, and then went and checked it for apache2: webmail# pwd /usr/ports/www/apache22 webmail# cat Makefile | grep CONFLICTS CONFLICTS= apache+mod_ssl-1.* apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.* apache+mod_ssl+modsnmp-1.* \ CONFLICTS+= apr-1.* This seems to me that I can have apache13 (without any SSL) and apache22 both installed, which would be great for me as I could work on building an SSL capable webmail server while users can still use the old webmail while the new one is in progress. >>I'd prefer not to have to re-do my apache install, but if >>there's some compelling reason I should, I'm interested in knowing it. > > > if you want ssl... Then I'm going to need to re-do apache some way, whether it be re-install and add SSL support to apache13, or move to apache22, got it. >>Also, when I've got it, I want users to have the option to use it, >>not be forced to (tinkering with a Squirrelmail webmail server here), so >>any information on that would be more than welcome. > > > Not sure what you mean by this. Your users will use HTTPS if they so request > it, or HTTP if they point it to http://yourserver/.... > I want my users to have the option to use SSL, but if they're having problems with it (browser issues, etc.) I still want them to be able to read their email, as sometime it's absolutely essential that they be able to keep up with email while on the road. -- Patrick Baldwin Systems Administrator Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. 1087 Beacon St. Newton, MA 02459 1-617-965-7455 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:24:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515A916A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from omta14.mta.everyone.net (sitemail2.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4EF13C484 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from dm43.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta14.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B9A44510; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm43 Received: by dm43.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 403968d3) id dm43.465dfe22.192b21; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:24:02 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQFgCwNGbXcikMDFxwIAAAAD,07b0bb6e8e75ff413681d0698f69c0dc From: "Mark Stout" To: "Mikhail Goriachev" , "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:23:56 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: <466C2644.8000303@webanoide.org> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:24:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Mikhail Goriachev [mailto:mikhailg@webanoide.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 9:27 AM > To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > Cc: Mark Stout; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE >=20 >=20 > Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: > >> > >> So how should I fix this? > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Mark Stout > >=20 > > cd /usr/src > > make cleanworld > > mergemaster -p > > make buildworld > > make buildkernel > > make installkernel > > reboot > >=20 > > cd /usr/src > > make installworld > > mergemaster -iU > > reboot > >=20 > > You are done. :) >=20 >=20 > The *correct* procedure is described in: >=20 > /usr/src/Makefile >=20 > and even more detailed at: >=20 > = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html >=20 Following the tasks in Rebuilding =E2=80=9Cworld=E2=80=9D in the = handbook = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html = I removed the /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to = compile the kernel its failing on unknown option "MD5". Commenting that = out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. What's happening = here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything = that explains why this would happen. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:26:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E585316A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600613C4AE for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5BGQQOG063836; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:26:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l5BGQQ9q063835; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:26:26 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Bjorn Boulder Message-ID: <20070611162626.GA63738@thought.org> References: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing twenty years of service to the Unix community Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:26:29 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:17:45PM -0700, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Well I checked this file: > > ll /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 183289 Nov 4 2004 > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README > > It's about 50 pages long. > > I'm worried that I'd miss something if I try to > understand all of it. > > I need something more dumbed down. > > Here is what I want: > > 1. I want to send mail > 2. I don't want to receive mail from the outside > 3. I do want to receive mail from the box itself. > > Actually 3 is not a hard requirement. > > Help anyone? > Since I've used sendmail for a dozen years--largely by hit or miss and following others' examples' let me add my two cents'. A couple years ago I bought a (used) copy of SENDMAIL (by O'Reilly, whose books are usually ++outstanding). I found the book virtually useless. It may be only *me*, but when somebody explains something to me, I get it. Reading 50 pages of dry text is like eating sawdust, so if you can get one of the text-to-speech apps going, having that read parts (or all) of the README might be a big help. I see, down-queue, some helpful hints. I have a bunch of cheat-sheet files; how-to's that have things spelled out in cookbook form or in practical theory form--things that are easily implementable. My SENDMAIL file is many pages. Maybe it's worth editing and putting up.... HTH! gary > -b > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:41:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1B716A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from omta14.mta.everyone.net (sitemail2.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F2313C458 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from dm51.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta14.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DC244AC7 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm51 Received: by dm51.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 403968d3) id dm51.465dfe37.19c049 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:41:24 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQFgCwNGbXs0s3rPIAIAAAAB,f7c34093069e97af8c590e77d443316f From: "Mark Stout" To: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:41:19 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:41:25 -0000 Thank you, Mark Stout VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. 530-626-4218 x205 Office 530-626-7182 Fax 530-554-9295 VoIP 916-240-2850 Cell www.vpm.com =20 =20 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and = intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are = addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby = notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly = prohibited, and asked to notify us immediately, then delete this email. = E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and = VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message. Any views or = opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily = represent those of VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Stout [mailto:mcs@vpm.com] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:24 AM > To: Mikhail Goriachev; Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mikhail Goriachev [mailto:mikhailg@webanoide.org] > > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 9:27 AM > > To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > > Cc: Mark Stout; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE > >=20 > >=20 > > Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > >> > > >> So how should I fix this? > > >> > > >> Thank you, > > >> Mark Stout > > >=20 > > > cd /usr/src > > > make cleanworld > > > mergemaster -p > > > make buildworld > > > make buildkernel > > > make installkernel > > > reboot > > >=20 > > > cd /usr/src > > > make installworld > > > mergemaster -iU > > > reboot > > >=20 > > > You are done. :) > >=20 > >=20 > > The *correct* procedure is described in: > >=20 > > /usr/src/Makefile > >=20 > > and even more detailed at: > >=20 > > = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > >=20 >=20 > Following the tasks in Rebuilding =E2=80=9Cworld=E2=80=9D in the = handbook=20 > = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html = I removed the=20 > /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the = kernel its failing on=20 > unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above = MD5, options LKM. > What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I = can't find anything=20 > that explains why this would happen. =20 A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and symlinked = to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new = kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not = need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And support = for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? # These all failed as unknown options: unknown option "MD5" unknown option "LKM" unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" unknown option "NSWAPDEV" unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing = FreeBSD) # Do not understand why these are fialing config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown # This failed as a syntax error controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 17:08:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ABA16A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mtx@edoxx.eu) Received: from h1126060.serverkompetenz.net (netecserver.com [81.169.181.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E14113C48C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mtx@edoxx.eu) Received: (qmail 18040 invoked by uid 60000); 11 Jun 2007 16:57:07 -0000 Received: from 89.35.223.97 by h1126060 (envelope-from , uid 60004) with qmail-scanner-1.24st SA 24 (spamassassin: 3.0.4. Clear:RC:0(89.35.223.97):SA:0(1.6/5.0):. Processed in 2.370144 secs); 11 Jun 2007 16:57:07 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 X-Envelope-From: mtx@edoxx.eu Received: from unknown (HELO e2) (mtx@edoxx.eu@89.35.223.97) by netecserver.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 16:57:05 -0000 Message-ID: <002d01c7ac9b$32415800$0101a8c0@e2> From: "vali bud" To: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:41:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on h1126060.serverkompetenz.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: proftpd and proftpd-admin root dir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:08:54 -0000 I want to install proftpd-admin for proFTPd on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. >From proftpd-admin webpage: " Now that we're finished setting up proFTPd Administrator it's time to = just move the entire folder into place (were place is in your Apache = servers document-root). Next we'll just finish up some of the commands = needed for the default configuration of proFTPd and proFTPd = Administrator to work as expected, and the first thing we need to do is = create the folder where we'll place our files so just follow my lead (if = you want to place it somewhere else you'd need to reconfigure both = proFTPd and proFTPd Administrator): cd / mkdir /ftp" WIth this sets up the root directory for proftpd to /ftp. My questions is (regarding to what i have read on proftpd-admin web = page): What options to i need to set to be able to make the root = directory in /home/ftp or any other directory? I have tried to modify the proftpd.conf file but if i enter another root = dir it doesn't work. I have googled alot but couldn't find anything = related to what i want to do.=20 I especially want to know what do i have to modify in proftpd and = afterwards i will change the *.php files from proftpd-admin. thanks in advance... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 17:44:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810E516A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77C213C4BF for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BHiAJw099347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:44:12 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466D89EA.2060203@webanoide.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:44:10 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Stout References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:44:15 -0000 Mark Stout wrote: > > Thank you, > Mark Stout > VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. > 530-626-4218 x205 Office > 530-626-7182 Fax > 530-554-9295 VoIP > 916-240-2850 Cell > www.vpm.com > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited, and asked to notify us immediately, then delete this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Stout [mailto:mcs@vpm.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:24 AM >> To: Mikhail Goriachev; Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mikhail Goriachev [mailto:mikhailg@webanoide.org] >>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 9:27 AM >>> To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri >>> Cc: Mark Stout; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE >>> >>> >>> Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: >>>> On 6/10/07, Mark Stout wrote: >>>>> So how should I fix this? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Mark Stout >>>> cd /usr/src >>>> make cleanworld >>>> mergemaster -p >>>> make buildworld >>>> make buildkernel >>>> make installkernel >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> cd /usr/src >>>> make installworld >>>> mergemaster -iU >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> You are done. :) >>> >>> The *correct* procedure is described in: >>> >>> /usr/src/Makefile >>> >>> and even more detailed at: >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html >>> >> Following the tasks in Rebuilding “world†in the handbook >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the >> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on >> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. >> What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything >> that explains why this would happen. > > A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > > I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? > > # These all failed as unknown options: > unknown option "MD5" > unknown option "LKM" > unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) > > > # Do not understand why these are fialing > config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > > # This failed as a syntax error > controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 Do you really need those options? GENERIC is sufficient for production use. Try running it first and see how it goes. I'd recommend adding/tweaking things only if you understand the outcome and necessity of them. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:08:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C7916A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: from web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.125.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EACCB13C45E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from severino42@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 75937 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jun 2007 18:08:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=BuRdtsoAtPdC2fTRws3sbKfkJ3kDryeytynlXLkyRSIj24rt5EE+E38UGh/bE6Ey/cXius+V7yxs7XL8KM6j3FArQOqo9vVk2nMSgMOOdwFbn5xUgQe5FCWv5ptn6FyBi7b/HWgICNwYUzYTU5MugUK0FS40Wq20NrYVTUUGzSU=; X-YMail-OSG: ss4htHEVM1k8ydwB6dLa3czzPLUgnudH6s9jLGCabkJUzfsGL930cw2GeU_YIaZeCuV4DMfawy1ScrytMlJ.25pai_Zi7AKUgC90w10CvVkCD8z1NhR8PCwhqhHZvg-- Received: from [71.174.240.100] by web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:08:42 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:08:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Harriet Severino To: Frank Wissmann In-Reply-To: <466D5E80.2000605@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <412214.19137.qm@web38813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem installing FreeBSD 6.2 on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:08:43 -0000 Hi, I did not reply to the list on this. Thanks you for yor help. I have changed the kern.securelevel and kde comes up. Now I am on to configureing and installing apps. H Severino --- Frank Wissmann wrote: > It may be that you configured securelevel on startup. Try with > "sysctl > kern.securelevel" to find out which is your securelevel. It may be 1 > or > greater. Then try to change it either with sysinstall or directly at > the > command prompt with "sysctl -w kern.securelevel=-1". This should > work. > > Greetings > > Frank > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:13:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9B516A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DDE13C48A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3769 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 18:13:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 18:13:51 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1E4BE28444; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:13:51 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070607130509.GA4004@gronau-ws> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:13:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070607130509.GA4004@gronau-ws> (mein name's message of "Thu\, 7 Jun 2007 15\:05\:09 +0200") Message-ID: <444plefjfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: some ports want to compile with icc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:13:52 -0000 mein name writes: > Some ports (e.g. clamav or lighttpd) want to compile with the icc, even if I don't select > it in my make.conf or somewhere else. I tried to set the gcc as > default compiler with CC=gcc but this doesn't change anything. If > I deinstall the icc I get an error while compiling clamav like this: > > > icc: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3/libclamav. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.53682.0 env make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! security/clamav (new compiler error) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed > > > > Any suggestions? It does not do this for me, and I cannot guess what could make it do so. Perhaps there is more information in the upgrade transcript, before the error? Are you sure you don't have something set in make.conf? > PS: English is not my first language. In that case, you're doing particularly well with it... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:18:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF1816A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1987F13C465 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 8266 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 18:18:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 18:18:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2D72328440; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:18:24 -0400 (EDT) To: Foo JH To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:18:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> (Foo JH's message of "Mon\, 11 Jun 2007 10\:26\:39 +0800") Message-ID: <44zm36e4nj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:18:26 -0000 Foo JH writes: > I'm using inetd + qmail to implement a mail server. The combo works, > but usually sending a mail takes some 5-10 seconds. > > I suspect it's largely because inetd or qmail is trying to do some dns > lookup or something, before letting it through. Is there any way to > shorten this process - if possible eliminate it altogether? What exactly is happening when this delay occurs? Are you asking to send an e-mail to a foreign mailserver without looking up that server's e-mail address? > Some time back, there was an advice to avoid inetd. It's probably a > good idea, but I hope to deal with this first before moving forward on > the setup. If your e-mail volumes are extremely low, it may even be a *good* idea. At the cost of a small extra latency, of course; but not multiple seconds worth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:21:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC816A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB813C487 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24209 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 18:21:23 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 18:21:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 0C1DB28440; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:21:23 -0400 (EDT) To: "tethys ocean" References: <235b80000706110032v6696e9a2s1c68654f299ebc6b@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:21:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <235b80000706110032v6696e9a2s1c68654f299ebc6b@mail.gmail.com> (tethys ocean's message of "Mon\, 11 Jun 2007 10\:32\:37 +0300") Message-ID: <44vedue4il.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: tcp port error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD_Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:21:26 -0000 "tethys ocean" writes: > Hi all > > I have a big problem about SMTP port . I am using qmail. Our my server cant > open smtp ports than it gives this error > > ## tail -f /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current > @40000000466cfb8926b54f34 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8a27ee119c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8b29151cdc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8c2a50e0cc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8d2b7e0a74 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8e2ca8ee14 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb8f2dd9fbd4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > @40000000466cfb902f0b7ec4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number > for -x > > > > any solutions? This problem is specific to qmail. You need to figure out what this "-x" option is (which is causing the trouble). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:24:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE1116A4E1 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487A313C4C2 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18163 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 18:24:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 18:24:33 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1AA1C28440; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:24:32 -0400 (EDT) To: "dhaneshk k" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:24:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: (dhaneshk k.'s message of "Mon\, 11 Jun 2007 10\:07\:10 +0000") Message-ID: <44r6oie4db.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procmailrc configuration fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:24:36 -0000 "dhaneshk k" writes: > THis is Dhanesh , Here I have to configure a .procmailrc > file in order to control spams in the mail system > > I had a few mailing lists , and I can send mails to these lists from > my personal mail id , > > in /etc/aliases tther is an entry for these lists as > mylists : list1,list2,list3 etc > > > but I have to block spams ,so I editted this entry as follows in > /etc/aliases > > mylists:spamassassin > > and I executed #newaliases > > and in /home/spamassassin I created a file .procmailrc as follows > (I changed the ownership as spamassassin:spamassassin to .procmailrc > and chmod -R 777 to procmailrc ) > > # ee /home/spamassassin/.procmailrc > :0 > ^TOmylists > { > :0 c > ! list1@mydomain > :0 c > ! list2@mydomain > } > > > > > But when ever I tried to send mails from my account to > mylists@mydomain , its not delivering the mails to receipients > (before configuring procmailrc its working fine but spams are coming > along with this so I decided to use procmail rc ) > > I tried this alos > > I tried to configure the /usr/local/etc/procmailrc file also the same > way , but its also not sending the mails to the receipients in the > lists... > > > > tail /var/log/mailog tells that the messages forwarded to Maildir > directory , all the mails are ther in /home/spamassassin/Maildir > but its not deliverd to the client ids .. > > So let me request you to help me what mistake i made while doing this > .Any suggestion will help me alot to solve this issue .. You need to configure the spamassassin user to invoke procmail. There are a number of ways to do this; you can even use it directly as a mail delivery agent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:49:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554BB16A46D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us [204.184.27.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C5913C4AE for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from [10.0.0.200] (unknown [204.184.27.217]) by mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4622688CF for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:20:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <466D925A.3000009@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:20:10 -0500 From: Scott Mayo Organization: Bloomfield Schools User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Backspace problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:49:34 -0000 I am not on any VI list, but thought I would post this here to see if anyone had any ideas. This is my first FreeBSD server, so I am still learning. I got my backspace and delete working the shell after a few adjustments, but they still act odd in VI. I have checked setting with my linux boxes (the backspace and delete work fine there) and everything looks the same. I did an stty -a | grep erase and it tells me that erase is Contral-? and erase2 is control-H. I have changed both around to make them either Ctrl-? or Ctrl-H, but that has not helped. If I hit backspace it just backs up on the line until were input-mode was started during this input-mode session. If I hit delete then it capitalizes the charcter behind the cursor and throws me into command-mode. I am not sure if there are anymore settings to change in FreeBSD or if it is a setting in VI. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks. -- Scott Mayo System Administrator Bloomfield Schools Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side and it holds the universe together. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:00:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163C016A474 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BF813C4BF for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F69A1A4D84 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C06651455 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:00:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2406CBE79; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:00:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:00:12 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070611190012.GA948@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070607130509.GA4004@gronau-ws> <444plefjfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <444plefjfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: some ports want to compile with icc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:00:13 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:13:51PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > mein name writes: > > > Some ports (e.g. clamav or lighttpd) want to compile with the icc, even if I don't select > > it in my make.conf or somewhere else. I tried to set the gcc as > > default compiler with CC=gcc but this doesn't change anything. If > > I deinstall the icc I get an error while compiling clamav like this: > > > > > > icc: not found > > *** Error code 127 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3/libclamav. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.90.3. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/clamav. > > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.53682.0 env make > > ** Fix the problem and try again. > > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > > ! security/clamav (new compiler error) > > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > It does not do this for me, and I cannot guess what could make it do > so. Perhaps there is more information in the upgrade transcript, > before the error? Are you sure you don't have something set in make.conf? I can confirm that clamav does NOT look for icc if it is not installed on the system. Perhaps it does detect it and try to use it automatically if it is present when 'make configure' runs. You will need to provide the config.log file to the clamav port maintainer for them to look into the problem. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:04:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB2C16A46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0659913C465 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2098881F7; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 975AA30066; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:04:41 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807125-9ef62bb000000801-8a-466d9cc9ae2a Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 8D72F300B2; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:04:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:04:40 -0700 To: Foo JH X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:04:42 -0000 Hi-- On Jun 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Foo JH wrote: > I'm using inetd + qmail to implement a mail server. The combo > works, but usually sending a mail takes some 5-10 seconds. > I suspect it's largely because inetd or qmail is trying to do some > dns lookup or something, before letting it through. Is there any > way to shorten this process - if possible eliminate it altogether? > > Some time back, there was an advice to avoid inetd. It's probably a > good idea, but I hope to deal with this first before moving forward > on the setup. It's certainly possible to disable DNS lookups entirely, and that might help reduce the delay you see, but in that case you'll have to configure qmail to relay all mail to the equivalent of a sendmail SMART_HOST (ie, to your ISP's SMTP relay), which performs MX lookups and so forth instead of your local qmail doing so. It is only recommended to use an MTA spawned from inetd if your traffic volume is very low-- probably well under 1000 messages/day. If your traffic level is higher, you should run your MTA as a daemon and not through inetd. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:06:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978B216A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8229A13C45B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from [172.24.241.13] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5BImfvr066380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:48:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Message-ID: <466D9908.2080900@enabled.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:48:40 -0700 From: Noah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dhclient: Can't update forward map bogus ... timed out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:06:34 -0000 HI List Folk, I recently added firewall filters to my home linux box, and now I am experiencing named errors. I am running DDNS that sends out updates for my dynamically assigned IP address for the router/linux box at the edge of my home network. It appears that those updates periodically time out. I can telnet from the linux box to port 53 of the DNS server just fine. It appears that the logging on the server side is not working as well. syslog is certainly running on the machine. I have directory permissions set correctly. here is my configuration: --- logging configuration --- logging { channel simple_log { file "/var/log/named/bind.log" versions 3 size 5m; severity warning; print-time yes; print-severity yes; print-category yes; }; category default{ simple_log; }; category dnssec { security_log; }; category update { security_log; }; category security { security_log; }; channel security_log { file "/var/log/named/dns-security.log" versions 5 size 20m; print-time yes; print-category yes; print-severity yes; severity info; }; }; --- logging configuration --- # ls -ld /var/log/named/ drwx------ 2 bind wheel 512 Jun 11 08:19 /var/log/named/ # ls -l /var/log/named/ total 0 ps -auxww | grep syslog root 68320 0.0 0.0 1376 988 ?? Is 8:26AM 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/run/log -s dns server side system info # pkg_info | grep bind bind9-9.3.4 Completely new version of the BIND DNS suite with updated D FreeBSD-6.2 --- snip --- Jun 11 07:17:10 hostname dhclient: Can't update forward map bogus.domain.com. to 10.0.0.1: timed out --- sinp --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:15:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E517816A4C9 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E82613C4E5 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4063088862B; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A352B29C004; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-9e01ebb000000a23-87-466d9f418043 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 8BD5E30400B; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <466D9908.2080900@enabled.com> References: <466D9908.2080900@enabled.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <261A792C-47B1-4AA4-9B68-95373BDFE77A@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:15:12 -0700 To: Noah X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: dhclient: Can't update forward map bogus ... timed out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:15:17 -0000 On Jun 11, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Noah wrote: > I recently added firewall filters to my home linux box, and now I > am experiencing named errors. I am running DDNS that sends out > updates for my dynamically assigned IP address for the router/linux > box at the edge of my home network. It appears that those updates > periodically time out. I can telnet from the linux box to port 53 > of the DNS server just fine. While DNS traffic can use 53/tcp, most DNS queries are done over UDP and not TCP. Presumably you should adjust your firewall rules or improve the logging of your firewall rulesets so you can better understand where the issue is. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:26:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CB916A4D1 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FEA13C4CA for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so947635mue for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=daGE6je2SP1a7x6xmjavQA8okO3F8DGdhb+zRh04n2fq/MQYqyyosJeOP9DMJolmQ2HQms3V1xdozMkdMnoOb7JeVlWbYzI6YPrZcseT3YFW1PiGLwTAAYOR7TBrLY3h1zKqqytY03RQHlrPTrdQC2zUdvcjGw6O/Eyd91TPhbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dIULU2DguVdlX3ENu26KP8hKdz+nbCCUw8vH3vCZO8hFPLic7D5babp5Wtsf3g1Rm15gbVNJDAgUMzxeNstAQ+BdlBEi3Ll434pbV3fjBXfJvFqJHz9Mg/MA7kxk08T3dNASVWhLrRsWK2GYeJcHpzmXBYuMbj/og/XaaRD3Cgk= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr11511283buf.1181589975149; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:26:15 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Mark Stout" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:26:17 -0000 On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the > > /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on > > unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. > > What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything > > that explains why this would happen. > > A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and > symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > > I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new > kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not > need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And > support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? > > # These all failed as unknown options: > unknown option "MD5" > unknown option "LKM" > unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) > > > # Do not understand why these are fialing > config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > > # This failed as a syntax error > controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all you should need for those in your kernel config is: device ata device atadisk device atapicd (and obviously:) device eisa device pci Which are already part of GENERIC. /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist and buttons to push. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:32:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E26616A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E4A13C44B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDB151926 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:32:10 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070611203210.47bb240d@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <1ACC527A-E8B3-42C6-9F71-F10B0B6F77A4@conundrum.com> References: <1ACC527A-E8B3-42C6-9F71-F10B0B6F77A4@conundrum.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d NETWORKING dependancy not waiting for network to be up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:32:15 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:28:26 -0400 Matt Pounsett wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > It looks like the NETWORKING dummy dependancy doesn't actually cause > the its dependants to wait for networking to be up, but simply for > interfaces to be configured. I'm wondering if this is actually > intended, or if it's an unavoidable design flaw, or what? > > I'm noting on my systems that ntpdate and ntpd are trying to start > before the network is actually reachable, and therefore both have > issues starting. ntpdate is unable to sync the clock properly > before ntpd starts, and ntpd doesn't seem to ever be able to sync to > a time server if it starts trying to contact one before the network > is fully up... and needs to be restarted after boot in order for it > to work properly. > > I'm working around the issue by sticking a 20 second delay into /etc/ > rc.d/NETWORKING (this is probably way more than necessary, but I'm > allowing for a large margin of error) which seems to fix my problem, > but is obviously not ideal. I wrote a lttle rcng script to handle it it. It runs immediately before ntpdate,and waits until it can ping my ISP's nameservers (ignoring the 127.0.0.1 entry in resolv.conf), or you can specify ip addresses. $ cat /usr/local/etc/rc.d/networkwait #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: networkwait # REQUIRE: named # BEFORE: ntpdate . /etc/rc.subr networkwait_enable=${networkwait_enable:-"NO"} name="networkwait" rcvar=`set_rcvar` stop_cmd=":" start_cmd="wait_network" wait_network(){ if [ "$networkwait_ping_hosts" ] ; then host_list="${networkwait_ping_hosts}" else # No hosts supplied - use external nameservers host_list=`awk '/^ *nameserver/ {print $2} '< /etc/resolv.conf | grep -E -v '^127\.0+\.0+\.0*1'` fi echo -n "Waiting for network access ... " while true ; do for inet_host in $host_list ; do if ping -nc1 $inet_host 2>&1 > /dev/null ; then echo "ping to ${inet_host} succeeded." # Re-Sync ipfilter and pf in case # they had failed DNS lookups /etc/rc.d/ipfilter resync /etc/rc.d/pf resync exit 0 fi done sleep 5 done } load_rc_config ${name} run_rc_command "$1" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:54:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1681716A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17713C457 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from kanga.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.0+Sun/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5BJsQxf010613; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:54:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (tigger.digitaltorque.ca [192.168.1.3]) by kanga.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E436B6; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id C971011EE76; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:54:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:54:19 -0400 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: Nikos Vassiliadis Message-ID: <20070611195419.GV20135@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Nikos Vassiliadis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200706041537.11883.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706041537.11883.nvass@teledomenet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debugging pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:54:33 -0000 --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said: > ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a decision > made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly interactively. > You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log Indeed. I turned up the logging and I had to turn it down before it filled /var. :) If I could get it to log like that to the console, then I could supervise it with runit, logging via svlogd. I guess there's no way to force that log le= vel to stdout?=20 Thanks, Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGbahrKGqCc1vIvggRAucxAKCDHOVs1YOPRhecfKL98h+71tVz4ACgsNAe mEsFwZi14TRiY5MpX+7T2mA= =hugf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fjEAjMKpll6GDq3U-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:00:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B727816A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104F713C448 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from photon.locolomo.org (unknown [192.168.0.32]) by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8452E01E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:00:32 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070522) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010901010708030606030408" Cc: Subject: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:00:35 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010901010708030606030408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi: I am a bit confused as to what exactly I am trying to do - or that is how the protocols layers and stuff. My current setup is like this: 10.0.0/24 192.168.0/24 static IP Wireless ))--- AP --- FreeBSD -------------- DSL ------------- Internet many-1 1-1 NAT NAT I'd like to have the 192.168.0/24 disappear from the network topology, and have the routable static ip right on my FreeBSD box. The DSL box is configured with PPPoE: WAN Connection Type PPPOE Internet IP address 85.48.194.xxx Subnet Mask 255.0.0.0 ISP Gateway Address 172.31.255.254 Primary DNS 192.168.0.1 For some bizare reason the ISP gateway is on a private LAN segment and the mask doesn't include my assigned static IP - but maybe that's not a problem? I can't figure out which protocol layers which in the internet connection setup. - I have to configure PPPoE on the FreeBSD box? - The 192.168.0/24 will not exactly disappear, but rather be like a "dead end" that only works for communication with the router - which has a web interface for configuration? - And the external interface will be a ppp0, not vr0 as currently? The DSL router in question is a Thomson Speedtouch 546v6. Any hints, howtos or other on how to do this? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms010901010708030606030408 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNzA2MTEyMDAwMzJaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBT0AmdWkGEcF3NiyOrkdfal+FdUKzBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgK4BgqothOXIMA1RSBZtEaZX5Zad l8BPsBHgW4/NdlYslnlfLhWebtH8PdK56Slqq1EBFScIKQX3aJCVIZ9qoX0+3H8JtNrePu7D pY+gE5Mf0BG6B89YONMkAVsX6oGZ7YorZ3KPl1DRgXPxv0avHpFaXqUPYjm+Kebt2Cmpm/u1 AAAAAAAA --------------ms010901010708030606030408-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:24:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D49216A468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) Received: from bgo1smout1.broadpark.no (bgo1smout1.broadpark.no [217.13.4.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1025F13C458 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyrreny@broadpark.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Received: from bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no ([217.13.4.93]) by bgo1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-0.15 (built Feb 9 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JJH00MB6NC84ZC7@bgo1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.4] ([88.90.75.171]) by bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-0.15 (built Feb 9 2007)) with ESMTPA id <0JJH009K2NBRKYC2@bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:23:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-id: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:24:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Is there a way to undelete? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:24:13 -0000 Hello! I'm just curious if there's a way to undo a rm -rf. There has to be something eqivalent in FreeBSD to all those recovery tools? Thanks, Kyrre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:26:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C41D16A46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason@kasdivi.com) Received: from sls-ec3p13.dca2.superb.net (mail.kasdivi.com [66.148.68.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3A713C46C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason@kasdivi.com) Received: (qmail 18099 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 16:22:09 -0500 Received: from c-68-45-177-112.hsd1.nj.comcast.net (HELO ?10.0.1.120?) (68.45.177.112) by mail.kasdivi.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 16:22:09 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <92E92B7C-6045-4B03-BE63-C3779DE4687D@kasdivi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Capt Current Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:00:18 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Upgrade from Freebsd 6.1-Release to Freebsd 6.2-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:26:51 -0000 Please excuse me I am a tad over my head head but I have been following Colin Percival excellent script to perform an upgrade and I always get a hang (i.e no more response and eventually a time out and drop of my ssh session) after I answer "does this look reasonable" The server says "The following files are affected by updates, but no changes have been downloaded because the files have been modified locally:" and freezes usually on "/etc/periodic/daily/470.status-named" any suggestions? jason hirsh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:41:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506E916A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3768D13C469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB6A88A888; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1734D400EB; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-a1888bb00000081c-b5-466db374ec7b Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 00C3840055; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> References: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6D458F25-9A4A-4DA3-BB11-F25E67831F84@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:41:23 -0700 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a way to undelete? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:41:24 -0000 On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Kyrre Nyg=E5rd wrote: > I'm just curious if there's a way to undo a rm -rf. Yes. Restore the deleted files from the backups you previously took. > There has to be something eq[u]ivalent in FreeBSD to all those =20 > recovery tools? Oh, there is. There's the Coroner's toolkit here: http://www.porcupine.org/forensics/tct.html ...with unrm & lazarus utilities which are capable, in theory, of =20 undeleting rm'ed files. This being said, because Unix systems involve many daemon processes =20 like syslog and cron and so forth which continue to write data to the =20= disks, it turns out to be relatively likely that files which are =20 deleted will get over-written more quickly than they would be in a =20 single-tasking or limited multi-tasking environment like DOS or early =20= flavors of Windows. --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:48:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603D016A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from designaproduct.biz (135-shost.hostoffice.hu [195.228.74.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244D613C465 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [172.16.0.43] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by designaproduct.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183411DD42D; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:41:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466DB4BA.5080601@shopzeus.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:46:50 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens B , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <010001c7aa63$100adca0$6601a8c0@KGISH> <20070609075227.GA13754@gronau-fs> In-Reply-To: <20070609075227.GA13754@gronau-fs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:48:20 -0000 Jens B wrote: > * Kiffin Gish [2007-06-09 09:45]: > >> I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, >> following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a >> complete mess. >> >> If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? >> >> Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance. >> >> -- >> Kiffin Rex Gish >> Gouda, The Netherlands >> > > In such cases the best would be to deinstall xorg with all > dependencies and install xorg from scratch. > Believe or not, I tried to install a new computer over the weekend. I installed only the base system from the CD, and tried to install with portsnap fetch portsnap extract cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade make make install portupgrade -a rehash portinstall xorg-server The result was a message saying that I should read /usr/ports/UPDATING and follow the instructions there to upgrade from 6.9 to 7.2. Even after I installed portupgrade-devel and "setenv XORG_UPGRADE" I still had trouble installing xorg 7.2 I'm not talking about upgrading, this was a new install. I believe there are problems with the xorg server in the ports tree, but I had no time to send in a report. I just fixed it by hand. If some of you is going to install a new machine in the future, please run it inside "script" and send a bug report. Best, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:53:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888B16A469 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1037013C457 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BKrlVx042619; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:53:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 12B21B903; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:53:47 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Kyrre =?iso-8859-15?Q?Nyg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20070611205347.GA25656@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a way to undelete? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:53:50 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:24:07PM +0200, Kyrre Nyg=E5rd wrote: > Hello! >=20 > I'm just curious if there's a way to undo a rm -rf. > There has to be something eqivalent in FreeBSD to all those recovery too= ls? Unless you've written new data to the disk, the old data is still there. So yes it is possible to recover files. Google for "UFS recovery". But unless you've made a backup (which you should) it won't be easy. There is restore(8), in case you've made backups with dump(8).=20 You could also set up a cron job to make nightly snapshots, and mount them somewhere so you can access the filesystem as it existed at the time the snapshot was taken. This way you don't have to mess around with backup media. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGbbZbEnfvsMMhpyURAtTNAJ9girAsuFPLOUGj6Fdjn4h4ewkT/wCgsEIz OzU3Wqn6h/KNygGZwxO1Ok8= =Kgqf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 21:32:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E029B16A46B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [67.139.134.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAF1713C48C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 16773 invoked by uid 98); 11 Jun 2007 21:32:59 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by o2.hostbaby.com (envelope-from , uid 1013) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.7/3399. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.07546 secs); 11 Jun 2007 21:32:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO l-i-e.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 21:32:59 -0000 Received: from 216.230.84.67 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com) by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:32:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <60136.216.230.84.67.1181597579.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <5d5204510706101749j593f54dbp689419d65a1b8942@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d5204510706101749j593f54dbp689419d65a1b8942@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:32:59 -0500 (CDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "James liu" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD6: php.ini not find in phpinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:32:57 -0000 On Sun, June 10, 2007 7:49 pm, James liu wrote: > i use ports to default setup... > > web£ºlighttpd > > php: php5+php5-extensions > > > cp /usr/local/etc/php.ini-recommended /usr/local/etc/php.ini > > restart lighttpd and phpinfo don't know php.ini. > > now i wanna config php moudel, but if no php.ini, i will do nothing. > > anyone know how to let phpinfo find php.ini? phpinfo() output includes the directory name where it is looking for php.ini Put your php.ini file there. You can also, in Apache2 and more recent versions of php, add a configure directive to Apahce that tells PHP where to look for php.ini. It is named something like PHPIniDir, I believe. http://apache.org Note that PHP running as an Apache module reads the php.ini file only once, when Apache STARTS UP. You *must* re-start Apache to get your "new" or "changed" php.ini file to be re-read. If you are running as CGI, PHP is re-started on each page hit, and reads php.ini at that time. If you are running as FCGI, re-start the FCGI process should do it, I would think, but never investigated... -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 21:38:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DFF16A41F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13FC13C468 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A5F51931 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:38:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:38:55 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070611223855.480f811a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <92E92B7C-6045-4B03-BE63-C3779DE4687D@kasdivi.com> References: <92E92B7C-6045-4B03-BE63-C3779DE4687D@kasdivi.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrade from Freebsd 6.1-Release to Freebsd 6.2-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:38:59 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:00:18 -0400 Capt Current wrote: > Please excuse me I am a tad over my head head but > > I have been following Colin Percival excellent script to perform an > upgrade and I always get a hang (i.e no more response and eventually > a time out and drop of my ssh session) after I answer "does this > look reasonable" The server says "The following files are affected > by updates, but no changes have > been downloaded because the files have been modified locally:" and > freezes usually on "/etc/periodic/daily/470.status-named" Firstly, don't upgrade to the 6.2-Release, use RELENG_6_2 to get the security updates. I don't know what Colin Percival's script is, but it sounds like it's intended for tracking development branches such as 6-stable. If I were you, I'd just follow the updating procedure described in the Handbook. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 22:35:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0021416A475 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854D213C4CA for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B511A3C19; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6AD5119F; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:35:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 20209BE79; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:35:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:35:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Laszlo Nagy Message-ID: <20070611223522.GA4633@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <010001c7aa63$100adca0$6601a8c0@KGISH> <20070609075227.GA13754@gronau-fs> <466DB4BA.5080601@shopzeus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466DB4BA.5080601@shopzeus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Jens B , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:35:30 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Jens B wrote: > >* Kiffin Gish [2007-06-09 09:45]: > > > >>I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, > >>following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a > >>complete mess. > >> > >>If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? > >> > >>Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? > >> > >>Thanks a lot in advance. > >> > >>-- > >>Kiffin Rex Gish > >>Gouda, The Netherlands > >> > > > >In such cases the best would be to deinstall xorg with all > >dependencies and install xorg from scratch. > > > Believe or not, I tried to install a new computer over the weekend. I > installed only the base system from the CD, and tried to install with > > portsnap fetch > portsnap extract > cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade > make > make install > portupgrade -a > rehash > portinstall xorg-server > > > The result was a message saying that I should read /usr/ports/UPDATING > and follow the instructions there to upgrade from 6.9 to 7.2. Even after > I installed portupgrade-devel and "setenv XORG_UPGRADE" I still had > trouble installing xorg 7.2 I'm not talking about upgrading, this was a > new install. Yes, the instructions also apply. > I believe there are problems with the xorg server in the > ports tree, but I had no time to send in a report. I just fixed it by > hand. If some of you is going to install a new machine in the future, > please run it inside "script" and send a bug report. Yes. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 23:52:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0A916A400 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69A513C44B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so2535410waf for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:52:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=TKuCpjfsU8VTXRAlIVneN1Y3GkZRb8QQZtUNg4e6F2CpaxoFB/o2sXEqVX1irDxe6t65P95mS777SFkyttmRKmt/N0CwFB+0VSzxtDycBRA3k0AkqUUefrSN8MX3YkIjb8GxOIaN22+zBiRKfFLdEms2dVeqLkp9KGA4TMHq3Zo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CM+RtQ74F56PGzqzuceDYFMWyAgtF4Eua5MpIR2mn/DboYlfs4yVV9aMd7xMy9UZayf2mzh7rm7HrQU9kNx28GJifGJfyZUrQT+qATU7HD54fUdAIeYpNGZ+Pbt656vFS+ozZdOKrHngLRCFgXIwRqaegdUUuO18Mmy2qZ032dg= Received: by 10.115.95.1 with SMTP id x1mr6031805wal.1181605923696; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.85.2 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:52:03 -0700 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: umount -f X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:52:04 -0000 Couple questions for anyone on the list who has a moment (and the answer to any of these): Objective: I need to kick people off of a storage drive (we'll say /dev/ad4), without corrupting the file system and without bringing the entire system down. I need to safely umount the file systems, even if my users have processes which have files open. 1. If I use "umount -f /dev/ad4s1a" to forcefully umount a file system, does this jeopardize the integrity of said file system? Like...will it jerk the run out from under a process in the middle of a disk write, thus leaving a half written file, or will it wait until the write is complete? (I guess this would largely depend on the disk controller?) 2. How do I get a list of processes that are accessing a specific file system, e.g. /dev/ad4s1a? 3. Is there any safe way to unconditionally umount a file system, even if a run-away process is writing to it (as bad of an idea as this is)? Thanks. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 00:17:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE316A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C7313C45A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-105-193.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.105.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E38AEBC78; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:17:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:17:14 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Modulok Message-Id: <20070611201714.35153d92.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> References: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umount -f X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:17:48 -0000 Modulok wrote: > > Couple questions for anyone on the list who has a moment (and the answer to > any of these): > > Objective: I need to kick people off of a storage drive (we'll say > /dev/ad4), without corrupting the file system and without bringing the > entire system down. I need to safely umount the file systems, even if my > users have processes which have files open. > > 1. If I use "umount -f /dev/ad4s1a" to forcefully umount a file system, does > this jeopardize the integrity of said file system? Like...will it jerk the > run out from under a process in the middle of a disk write, thus leaving a > half written file, or will it wait until the write is complete? (I guess > this would largely depend on the disk controller?) I don't believe there are any guarantees if your -f it. The filesystem will probably be OK, but I would expect files to get corrupt. > 2. How do I get a list of processes that are accessing a specific file > system, e.g. /dev/ad4s1a? fstat(1) is your friend. > 3. Is there any safe way to unconditionally umount a file system, even if a > run-away process is writing to it (as bad of an idea as this is)? I would write a script that pulls fstat data, then kills any processes with files open, then attempts to unmount the filesystem. If that fails, go through the fstat data again and kill -9 the processes this time. If all that fails, you can finally choose to umount -f. You could also try some looping constructs, kill/umount four or five times before switching to kill -9/umount, etc. It all depends on how desperate you are to get the filesystem unmounted, how long you're willing to wait, how much data you're willing to lose, etc. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 00:56:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C2716A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703F013C44B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from [172.23.23.190] (lan23.xxiii.com [208.62.177.50]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BIRg4G079290; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:27:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Message-ID: <466D9421.3050703@xxiii.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:27:45 -0400 From: Rob User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bjorn Boulder References: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:29 -0000 Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests that > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf Directly building & editing the .cf file has been considered poor practice for many years now. Unless you're really masochistic, you just put some simple options in the .mc file and run some scripts to use m4 to build the final .cf file. FreeBSD gets even easier easier -- there's a /etc/mail/Makefile you can use to build and install the configs. Take a look at the notes in the top of it. Also, if you just want to get mail off the local machine to an upstream server in your organization or ISP, you can install ssmtp from the ports. It only needs a 4 line config file, and do security issues. -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 00:56:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8152716A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BE013C458 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Received: from [172.23.23.190] (lan23.xxiii.com [208.62.177.50]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BEiFrp078244; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:44:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from r17fbsd@xxiii.com) Message-ID: <466D5FC2.3090701@xxiii.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:44:18 -0400 From: Rob User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "B. Cook" References: <466D57D5.4020803@poughkeepsieschools.org> In-Reply-To: <466D57D5.4020803@poughkeepsieschools.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Confused about dhclient .conf and -script.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:29 -0000 B. Cook wrote: > After reading way more about isc-dhcpd than I wanted to, I found out > that I can customize /etc/dhclient.conf (great). I found a great > dhclient.conf but it seemed to do things that I could not get my FreeBSD > box(es) to do. I'm not quite sure what problems you're experiencing, but here's the one I use to configure a secondary interface to a cable tv isp: interface "fxp0" { supersede domain-name "mydomain.com"; supersede domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1; prepend routers 208.34.1.33; request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers; } And of course: fconfig_fxp0="DHCP" in rc.conf I just want an address for it, I DON'T want their Hostname or DNS, so the supersede lines prevent it from replacing those. You probably want to remove those. -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 01:24:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD0D16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA51013C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3051A3C19; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1E1513DD; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:24:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 22A40BE79; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:24:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:24:30 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20070612012430.GA6276@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> <20070611201714.35153d92.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070611201714.35153d92.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Modulok Subject: Re: umount -f X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:24:30 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:17:14PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > Modulok wrote: > > > > Couple questions for anyone on the list who has a moment (and the answer to > > any of these): > > > > Objective: I need to kick people off of a storage drive (we'll say > > /dev/ad4), without corrupting the file system and without bringing the > > entire system down. I need to safely umount the file systems, even if my > > users have processes which have files open. > > > > 1. If I use "umount -f /dev/ad4s1a" to forcefully umount a file system, does > > this jeopardize the integrity of said file system? Like...will it jerk the > > run out from under a process in the middle of a disk write, thus leaving a > > half written file, or will it wait until the write is complete? (I guess > > this would largely depend on the disk controller?) > > I don't believe there are any guarantees if your -f it. The filesystem > will probably be OK, but I would expect files to get corrupt. Shouldn't happen, if it does it's a bug. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 02:20:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5714F16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E8813C4B0 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1415247wxd for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=mOdJdzbLIP5AnmDMeE+pinqP7KWniLbw+sJWbSc2N+UlpwmAzTgEufr8EfPJgqDXG5S0+CukN4WW3tVem/eFh6CJs02398fuHdq0OvJrotDk2s6TPAf3ToVH5/GRV+Ipl9XX+n8qOZqe3W6DokEkX7gowKw+nu+ObXlW2qk0KI4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=TiSARMDA8GTXyNpvV2kIADKNY1KxpL/Tw5jcago8YuDqnG0QMR4qY13rIZ0WzPf9NABPJS+xZnLcoYscormySbUuwFtqYPvGG7ZiKqVL5fCUUpgxZOg2qpGzoF+jzVE/N9QIdxo5O4AhWayb8a6uCOBQw8Mzcap9EcSdexHIDE4= Received: by 10.90.98.3 with SMTP id v3mr6064313agb.1181614847231; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:20:47 -0700 From: snowcrash+freebsd Sender: schneecrash@gmail.com To: freebsd-pf , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 91baf1d6f50edf66 Cc: Subject: how 2 address&port map outbound traffic to multiple/different IPs on a single intfc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:20:48 -0000 hi, i'm trying to do 1:1 (nat?) *outbound* address mapping using pf, but NOT 'whole server' binat, but rather a single address&port. i'm close, but no cigar ... any suggestions? details follow ... thanks! i've a block of 8 static IPs, x.x.x.1 - x.x.x.8. freebsd6.2-Rp5+pf are installed as my edge router/firewall. the router has a SINGLE external interface, "sis0", mapped at bootup to a single pppoe-generated interface, "tun0". ifconfig shows that "tun0" is assigned the 'primary' IP of x.x.x.1. so most of my LAN->WAN traffic travels out, appearing to originate at x.x.x.1. i've two mail servers on my LAN, at private addresses z.z.z.100 & z.z.z.200. i've NAT+rdr set up to address-map WAN to LAN addresses for the two servers. nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to x.x.x.2 port 25 -> z.z.z.102 port 25 rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to x.x.x.3 port 25 -> z.z.z.103 port 25 where $ext_if == tun0. now as to OUTBOUND mapping ... i want to make sure that traffic: FROM internal server @ z.z.z.102:25 exits $ext_if, 'seen' as SRC_ADDR=x.x.x.2 & FROM internal server @ z.z.z.103:25 exits $ext_if, 'seen' as SRC_ADDR=x.x.x.3 reading: "PF: Network Address Translation (NAT)" http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html and, "PF: Address Pools and Load Balancing http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html (1) 'binat' is not what i want, as i want to ONLY map a single addr for a single port -- NOT the whole server in a 1:1 mapping for all ports and, (2) from the POOLS discussion, 'simple' outbound NAT: nat on $ext_if from z.z.z.102 port 25 to any -> ($ext_if) nat on $ext_if from z.z.z.102 port 25 to any -> ($ext_if) doesn't do it either - i dno't think -- as $ext_if picks up the "primary IP" assigned via the pppoe startup, x.x.x.1. so, i think i'm in the right ballpark with *nat of some sort, but how do i get this done correctly? cheers! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 02:21:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFCE16A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E15E13C4CA for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1043474mue for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o34OulELqNscnS2grpFg5C4PZMpC0spqqa+Cm/v6d7KOzNvHfSIPEN2p/X//0h4eZF0YVfDl/BEG5X1/3XTbFZJ9AYrHgWhHxajMs/MCYxTMza1GJa7pDoqWQLzRrRjk7A8rmLvM7pONZW4vgWqklPaS3tvAj8iWqwPIh61ixRQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Bxtet6updIhhBp/Q8IaHWpd+/kfwy7GnRLsT3X+uOTwByIUscTzBucJCW108VebZE+NqGS+e9/VtXC4ML3CZyg0LU5T0mbGNwN4X8u8bV4jVAdEfwhzsOkIxYJxJGSbawNn/uMp/XMkUZq8cWDN7znao2htAc4bQQr99W4tIblU= Received: by 10.82.174.20 with SMTP id w20mr12200450bue.1181614912243; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:21:52 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Modulok In-Reply-To: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umount -f X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:55 -0000 On 11/06/07, Modulok wrote: > 3. Is there any safe way to unconditionally umount a file system, even if a > run-away process is writing to it (as bad of an idea as this is)? UFS is refreshingly robust (at least in my experience) in this regard, in that you may end up with a truncated (or slightly mauled) file but never a corrupt filesystem. Even kicking the power cord out only results in minor, repairable corruption something like 30% of the time. Again, in terms of personal experience I would suggest that umount -f is shrug-inducingly "safe" at 3 or 4 nines of the time. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 02:55:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C11816A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE6813C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1419989wxd for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RXRD7Xi7UxQt2GzuemteSlML7N1ZFfGmKduhiS/cwZAC+WYThr68oxPsYlQSgbr/oixOT8tQS41ojJSogyscMKpFCItrKE0IAGxmyXEtHj3den0c3AFWR5t2XC5nIapWJ0w4uWrTyK52SwVIPIL8XfBtdVQ/lqK0z8LTb0RVH6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HmUeBlmH8/jUxC4eVbWv2tRQwtE9mp+k5atBqTQ8y2z6BZmA/4jUhwLkLG4zHC2wQG96B22eIkDchTf1CjoV9sg34Z26f6QnnUmjYiCoLBOW2aioO9dFYhObGzx28rPzV65bTGIfv6eiu/BBfxuM3UQT7gHCj13q1/imvNfADfM= Received: by 10.70.57.8 with SMTP id f8mr9498593wxa.1181615429673; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.63.4 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e10486b0706111930y7758be8nc733a84679f0dddf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:30:29 -0300 From: "Alexandre Biancalana" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?=" In-Reply-To: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <466DAF67.6080804@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a way to undelete? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:55:28 -0000 On 6/11/07, Kyrre Nyg=E5rd wrote: > > Hello! Hi ! I'm just curious if there's a way to undo a rm -rf. > There has to be something eqivalent in FreeBSD to all those recovery tools? Maybe... after that, mount your filesystem read-only, do a full block copy (something like dd if=3D/dev/of/deleted_files of=3D/some/path/deleted.dd), pray... and.... Install /usr/ports/sysutils/sleuthkit and /usr/ports/sysutils/autopsy Look at www.sleuthkit.org, this site has useful articles on how to use thes= e tools. Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 03:41:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DA716A480 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [68.77.126.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FD713C489 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5C3fBpj095243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:41:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l5C3fAFk095242; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:41:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:41:10 -0500 From: Josh Tolbert To: Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: <20070612034110.GA95034@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20070607204129.GA45269@just.puresimplicity.net> <466937C6.1010306@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466937C6.1010306@dial.pipex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (just.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:41:11 -0500 (CDT) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o strangeness... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:41:14 -0000 On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Josh Tolbert wrote: > > >(15:38:21 ) $ pkg_info | grep bison > >bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with > >Yacc > >(15:38:30 ) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bison2 bison > >(15:38:34 ) $ sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison > >---> Reinstalling 'bison-1.75_2,1' (devel/bison) > > > > > Have you tried "sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/bison2 bison" in case it's > some bug in parsing merged options? Worth a PR in any case... > > Failing that you could just pkg_delete bison and install bison2 afresh. > You shouldn't have to but... > > --Alex Hi Alex, Yes, I did exactly that. Take a look at the example above. :) Anyway, a PR has been filed and the response is, "it's a feature." I'm not sure how it's a feature, but it is. The example I was given looks like this: $ pkg_version -t 2.3_1 1.75_2,1 < I'm guessing it's just doing some odd string comparison instead of breaking the version number apart and handling it with weight on the major version number, etc. Ironically, portupgrade still does things right. portupgrade-devel is the port I'm having problems with. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. -- Helen Keller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 03:49:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E5516A538 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE18B13C569 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:49:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l5C3nl9N047834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id l5C3nkWX047832; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 ([192.168.200.61]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA07726; Mon, 11 Jun 07 20:01:55 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:05:12 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kris@obsecurity.org Message-Id: <466e0d68.CIFJDnc9PBwkmMtQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <64c038660706111652p311c6d84i1ec295edcfc16994@mail.gmail.com> <20070611201714.35153d92.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070612012430.GA6276@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070612012430.GA6276@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umount -f X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:49:53 -0000 > > > 1. If I use "umount -f /dev/ad4s1a" to forcefully umount a > > > file system, does this jeopardize the integrity of said > > > file system? Like...will it jerk the run out from under > > > a process in the middle of a disk write, thus leaving a > > > half written file, or will it wait until the write is > > > complete? (I guess this would largely depend on the > > > disk controller?) > > > > I don't believe there are any guarantees if your -f it. > > The filesystem will probably be OK, but I would expect > > files to get corrupt. > > Shouldn't happen, if it does it's a bug. umount -f should not corrupt the filesystem, IOW "fsck" of an FS immediately after "umount -f" should not report anything more serious than some homeless files (if the last link had been removed, but the inode had not been released because some process still had it open). However data corruption seems likely if it yanks the rug out from under a process that has, say, written part of a transaction to a database file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 04:18:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604B816A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 188E013C468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1557 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jun 2007 04:18:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=J7dueOD56gScDf4v4QI3Ixsb2eCaTsIDPrWF4EfOYRfrgBVm2SQh4KFQgVxg/cgFQwNp2PpIVD6q42M24G5PKrTvWAFLt4YEfcTbYvFfa75+/IOZaDK/s4q02CRrxX1USK9G08pH0oDwKSUovXxzHzpNGxcSWy4ROhzULQOKaR8=; X-YMail-OSG: .Qq.1UIVM1n9FFi6ReooFSBYhM5ong9qWk7bT3tayJ4wFYGMlDQNhPz0HwlylVe5jQ_FVu_WxWyuG7GOvK1RVtm0_C0u0VUKUO2tWdlF7DAheyy2j1WdEX0teDX4F8MN11I209XP9K8QPZgazCjCYCGe0w-- Received: from [24.221.134.150] by web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:18:29 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:18:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <297981.1537.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: RE: Backspace problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:18:30 -0000 Scott Mayo wrote: .... If I hit backspace it just backs up on the line until were input-mode was started during this input-mode session. If I hit delete then it capitalizes the charcter behind the cursor and throws me into command-mode. .... === This way to get things to delete in vi seems odd to me. I have always used 'x' to delete from the right, and "X" to delete from the left. Maybe some hacks of vi include alternative methods to navigate. The problem with learning a method using shortcuts is that the "pure" method becomes unnatural and difficult. vi becomes real useful once you start doing things in it by reflex. If your reflexes are of the pure method then you should be good from one vi to the next. Even in my case, using the arrow keys seems more natural for jumping around (than using the jkl and ; keys). This is even more true for me since I use the Dvorak keyboard layoun and j, k, l and ; are not close together (well, j and k are -- and l and ; are too; but still not quick or easy to use for navigation.) Maybe the vim port in the ports collection will bring you completeness in your OS experience. ====== Because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the human heart is fully set to do evil. Ecclesiastes 8:11 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 06:11:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D0016A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amin.scg@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD76B13C465 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amin.scg@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so3133256pyi for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to; b=BVpNdWpSHwRIkKbiHUPPtd9U9uyRo+bdvoTcOJE1MezhrWKmCDzaUAVwzaNE2sbL9CRM2fBQA1OxQpakMO7JM0k32cLw58K8i/hEjmGjgCKkpkJIcae/UCVTWEthQ8XXbpGu5qMqJOTMz0NkljOemF8g8/msSEq/XUI7wbBoM8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to; b=PEdDlP4k9IlOFSD6kCMBzgecV/ttUzT0tMDcM+xfGnkld39LOJYA1X+hTur0V0D4YJXkt3Fck+kUt0YvtWFJOj4YAui5UjBG1UxGZa50MII8XaGO0M+RB3/lxDxqpxFMcrD/+hNbQPUYtP8T6B+FG437P0oSIdAzG7484l5W0b0= Received: by 10.35.43.10 with SMTP id v10mr10534550pyj.1181627211668; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inspiron03 ( [219.95.177.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18sm25623175nzo.2007.06.11.22.46.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:46:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aminuddin Abdullah" To: References: <20070611120025.A7AD216A4C5@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:46:44 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcesIHcSZ23mGyBHQjuttbp6lf55FwAk8qyw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: <20070611120025.A7AD216A4C5@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Cannot su or have root access after changing loader.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:11:10 -0000 Loader.conf with the following statement disable all su or root access: kern.dfldsiz="1G" kern.maxdsiz="1G" kern.maxssiz=131072 When I add the above 3 lines, all access to su or even single user boot is restricted without any error messages. Is this a bug or "1G" is not supported for maximum data size? My server is a 2GB ram E6600 with 400GB HDD. What are the valid values for these lines? thanks -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:00 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 182, Issue 2 Send freebsd-questions mailing list submissions to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org You can reach the person managing the list at freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of freebsd-questions digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? (Doug Hardie) 2. Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? (Bjorn Boulder) 3. Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? (Bjorn Boulder) 4. Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? (Toomas Aas) 5. tcp port error (tethys ocean) 6. Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB (Enrique Ayesta Perojo) 7. Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB (Andreas Rudisch) 8. Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? (Bjorn Boulder) 9. procmailrc configuration fails (dhaneshk k) 10. Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB (Enrique Ayesta Perojo) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:45:48 -0700 From: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? To: Bjorn Boulder Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4FF0C5BA-2DCC-4335-B340-9B0FA4393608@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jun 10, 2007, at 21:25, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Doug, Mats > > Your advice is on the money; thanks. > > I see this: > > Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: l5AAhekD015068: > to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle > (1004/1005), > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=30062, > relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests that > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > It appears that the box cannot send mail to itself: > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84ObZ014546: > to=postmaster, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=154501, > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by > [127.0.0.1] > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: > to=root, > ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=6+00:00:26, xdelay=00:00:00, > mailer=relay, > pri=691450, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5485I55093939: > l5A84Oba014546: > sender notify: Cannot send message for 5 days > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: l5A84Oba014546: > to=root, > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=152806, > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by > [127.0.0.1] > > Currently, my main assumption is that > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > is the primary administrative interface for e-mail. That is correct, but you don't want to directly mess with sendmail.cf. You really want to use the mc file and then make to build the cf file. Its much easier and more readable. See /usr/ share/sendmail/cf/readme for more details. The cf files are in another directory from there named cf. You will also want to use sendmail -bv email-address to have sendmail show you how and where it will deliver for the address: email-address. That is a useful tool. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:02:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? To: Doug Hardie Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <695341.59766.qm@web57513.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 ok, I'll look at that readme. And.... I nosed around on the box for clues about sendmail.cf It looks like the previous sysadmin ignored sendmail.cf I see this: bash jake oracle /etc/mail 14 $ pwd /etc/mail bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 15 $ ls -latr total 582 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 569 Nov 4 2004 virtusertable.sample -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40449 Nov 4 2004 submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57796 Nov 4 2004 sendmail.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 243 Nov 4 2004 mailertable.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 400 Nov 4 2004 mailer.conf -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5588 Nov 4 2004 helpfile -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 40449 Nov 4 2004 freebsd.submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57796 Nov 4 2004 freebsd.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1606 Nov 4 2004 aliases -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 407 Nov 4 2004 access.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2896 Nov 4 2004 README -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6809 Nov 4 2004 Makefile -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 65536 Oct 31 2005 aliases.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Aug 21 2006 motel411.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 40400 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.submit.cf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 57747 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.cf -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 894 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.submit.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4113 Aug 21 2006 motel411.com.mc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 894 Aug 21 2006 freebsd.submit.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4113 Aug 21 2006 freebsd.mc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 52 Aug 21 2006 local-host-names -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 267 Aug 21 2006 virtusertable drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 21 2006 ./ -rw-r----- 1 root wheel 65536 Aug 21 2006 virtusertable.db drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 2048 Nov 11 2006 ../ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ It looks like administrative activity was happening on Aug 21 2006 I looked at motel411.sh... bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 16 $ cat motel411.sh #! /bin/sh cp freebsd.mc motel411.com.mc /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 motel411.com.mc > motel411.com.cf cp freebsd.submit.mc motel411.com.submit.mc /usr/bin/m4 -D_CF_DIR_=/usr/share/sendmail/cf/ /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 motel411.com.submit.mc > motel411.com.submit.cf /usr/sbin/makemap hash virtusertable.db < virtusertable chmod 0640 virtusertable.db bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ bash jake oracle /etc/mail 17 $ I'll search google for info about these files: freebsd.mc freebsd.submit.mc virtusertable virtusertable.db And I'll read that readme: /usr/share/sendmail/cf/readme -b --- Doug Hardie wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2007, at 21:25, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > > > Doug, Mats > > > > Your advice is on the money; thanks. > > > > I see this: > > > > Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: > l5AAhekD015068: > > to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle > > (1004/1005), > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=30062, > > relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > > stat=Deferred: Connection > > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > > > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests > that > > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > > > It appears that the box cannot send mail to > itself: > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5A84ObZ014546: > > to=postmaster, > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=154501, > > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > > Connection refused by > > [127.0.0.1] > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5485I55093939: > > to=root, > > ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=6+00:00:26, > xdelay=00:00:00, > > mailer=relay, > > pri=691450, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > > stat=Deferred: Connection > > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5485I55093939: > > l5A84Oba014546: > > sender notify: Cannot send message for 5 days > > > > Jun 10 03:05:44 jake sendmail[14546]: > l5A84Oba014546: > > to=root, > > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > > pri=152806, > > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > > Connection refused by > > [127.0.0.1] > > > > Currently, my main assumption is that > > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > is the primary administrative interface for > e-mail. > > That is correct, but you don't want to directly mess > with > sendmail.cf. You really want to use the mc file and > then make to > build the cf file. Its much easier and more > readable. See /usr/ > share/sendmail/cf/readme for more details. The cf > files are in > another directory from there named cf. > > You will also want to use > sendmail -bv email-address > to have sendmail show you how and where it will > deliver for the > address: email-address. That is a useful tool. > > ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&c s=bz ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:17:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Message-ID: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Well I checked this file: ll /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 183289 Nov 4 2004 /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README It's about 50 pages long. I'm worried that I'd miss something if I try to understand all of it. I need something more dumbed down. Here is what I want: 1. I want to send mail 2. I don't want to receive mail from the outside 3. I do want to receive mail from the box itself. Actually 3 is not a hard requirement. Help anyone? -b ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:25:39 +0300 From: Toomas Aas Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? To: Bjorn Boulder Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <466CF8F3.9080605@raad.tartu.ee> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Here is what I want: > > 1. I want to send mail > 2. I don't want to receive mail from the outside > 3. I do want to receive mail from the box itself. The default Sendmail configuration on FreeBSD should be sufficient for what you want to do. You just need to start Sendmail the right way. Make sure you have the following in /etc/rc.conf: sendmail_enable="NO" Then give this command: /etc/rc.d/sendmail start Now sendmail should start up, listening on loopback interface only. You can verify this with command: sockstat -4 Among the output you should see this line: root sendmail 562 4 tcp4 127.0.0.1:25 *:* Then try telnet localhost 25 and make sure you get connected. Additionally try telnet yourserver 25 from another host and make sure you don't get connected. I have one web server (FreeBSD 5.5) with sendmail set up this way. -- Toomas Aas ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:32:37 +0300 From: "tethys ocean" Subject: tcp port error To: FreeBSD_Questions Message-ID: <235b80000706110032v6696e9a2s1c68654f299ebc6b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi all I have a big problem about SMTP port . I am using qmail. Our my server cant open smtp ports than it gives this error ## tail -f /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd/current @40000000466cfb8926b54f34 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8a27ee119c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8b29151cdc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8c2a50e0cc tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8d2b7e0a74 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8e2ca8ee14 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb8f2dd9fbd4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x @40000000466cfb902f0b7ec4 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for -x any solutions? ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo Subject: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <200706111013.04972.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Hello I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 RAID controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller is supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem, the controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported by AMD64) Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 TB? Thanks ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:27:34 +0200 From: Andreas Rudisch Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: Enrique Ayesta Perojo Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070611112734.a3014ee1.cyb.@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote: > Hello > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 RAID > controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller is > supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. > > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, > then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the > disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem, the > controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried > with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported by > AMD64) > > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 > TB? > > Thanks A quick google search revealed this: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20070611/f2 58f639/attachment-0001.pgp ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:39:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Bjorn Boulder Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: bornboulder77@yahoo.com Message-ID: <912525.50114.qm@web57508.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 People, I got sendmail working to send mail. I started with this: http://www.google.com/search?q=bsd+sendmail+configuration >From there I found 2 excellent links which answered all my questions: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html http://www.technoids.org/freebsdsendmailfaqs.html It's easy to configure sendmail so it is only a sender, not a receiver of mail: In /etc/rc.conf put this: sendmail_enable="NO" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO). And from the faq link this was useful since it told me how to start sendmail: 5. How do I start sendmail? # cd /etc/mail # make start 6. How do I stop sendmail? # cd /etc/mail # make stop After I started sendmail I waited a bit and then sure enough, I found the e-mail I was looking for in my yahoo account. -b ____________________________________________________________________________ _______ You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:07:10 +0000 From: "dhaneshk k" Subject: procmailrc configuration fails To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed THis is Dhanesh , Here I have to configure a .procmailrc file in order to control spams in the mail system I had a few mailing lists , and I can send mails to these lists from my personal mail id , in /etc/aliases tther is an entry for these lists as mylists : list1,list2,list3 etc but I have to block spams ,so I editted this entry as follows in /etc/aliases mylists:spamassassin and I executed #newaliases and in /home/spamassassin I created a file .procmailrc as follows (I changed the ownership as spamassassin:spamassassin to .procmailrc and chmod -R 777 to procmailrc ) # ee /home/spamassassin/.procmailrc :0 ^TOmylists { :0 c ! list1@mydomain :0 c ! list2@mydomain } But when ever I tried to send mails from my account to mylists@mydomain , its not delivering the mails to receipients (before configuring procmailrc its working fine but spams are coming along with this so I decided to use procmail rc ) I tried this alos I tried to configure the /usr/local/etc/procmailrc file also the same way , but its also not sending the mails to the receipients in the lists... tail /var/log/mailog tells that the messages forwarded to Maildir directory , all the mails are ther in /home/spamassassin/Maildir but its not deliverd to the client ids .. So let me request you to help me what mistake i made while doing this .Any suggestion will help me alot to solve this issue .. thanks in advance dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Get Married in 2007. Join Shaadi.com FREE! www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=mhottag ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:37 +0200 From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net> Message-ID: <200706111211.37313.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" El Lunes, 11 de Junio de 2007 11:27, Andreas Rudisch escribis: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:13:04 +0200 > > Enrique Ayesta Perojo wrote: > > Hello > > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 > > RAID controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID > > controller is supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. > > > > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 > > Terabyte, then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it > > cannot find the disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then > > there is no problem, the controller detects the disk and i can install > > FreeBSD on it. I have tried with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has > > a Xeon processor supported by AMD64) > > > > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger > > than 2 TB? > > > > Thanks > > A quick google search revealed this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html > > > Andreas Yes, i knew that page, but as it seems that the project has been forgotten for quite a long time i thought there could be some other way to do it.. Thanks anyway ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" End of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 182, Issue 2 ************************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 06:38:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B216A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6626B13C45D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 31903 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 16:38:14 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 16:38:14 +1000 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:11 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Peter Pluta Message-ID: <20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost> In-Reply-To: <11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org> <11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com> <11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:38:15 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Peter Pluta wrote: > I see, I disabled bayes and awl in spamassassin, and updated amavisd-new > from ports. I have a different problem. Mail I am sending out is being > thrown away because it's being flagged as spam. I'm stumped, it never did > this before.=20 =46rom memory, you can tell amavis which are your networks, so it doesnt scan= emails on the way out. (or maybe you tell postfix to only send the email v= ia amavis on the way out, not in... i cant remember nor check atm). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Sysadmins can't be sued for malpractice, but surgeons don't have to deal with patients who install new versions of their own innards. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet= . Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have b= een Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 06:41:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B1516A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s41.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s41.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29C513C4C3 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.106]) by bay0-omc3-s41.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:41:01 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:41:00 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:40:57 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:40:57 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2007 06:41:00.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[A40B1F90:01C7ACBC] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Xorg libraries upgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:41:02 -0000 Hi everybody , This is Dhanesh , I m a newbe to FreeBsd , I had a intel p4 box with FreeBSD-6.1 Os with Gnome 2.18. installed and , this desktop working fine for last 2 months . Mean while I tried to install OpenOffice from ports collection for this box , but it is asking for an upgrade of Xorg libraries , so I followed the /usr/ports/UPDATING procedure line by line ,, every thing went fine at the stage where I reached # portupgrade -aP ( while runnig this command about an hour or more ) ther HAPPENED a power failure , after this the m/c restarted and the Desktop environment lost for ever , Its asking for command login without Desktop GUI login , ther is an error message its showing gdm_server_spawn : Xserver not found : /usr/X11R6/bin/X : 0 -audit /var/gdm/: 0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt9 Failed to start X server several times in a short time period , disabling display:0 I tried to continue the portupgrade -aP command again but its showing errors , Stale dependency : at-spi-1.18.1_1 ----> xmlcatmgr-2.2 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix , or specify -0 to force asking pkgdb -F to run # pkgdb -F I executed but its showing some Duplicated origin : multimedia/gstreamer -gstreamer-0.10.12 gstreamer80-0.8.12_2 Unregister any of them ?[no] I enter no for 3/4 times for some duplicate origins Then it asking for Stale dependency at-spi-1.18.1_1 -->xmlcatmgr-2.2 (textproc/xmlcatmgr) : ........................ ............................ Install stale dependency ?[yes] y but its failed showing that stop in /usr/ports/textproc/xmlcatmgr (I tried to to deinstall and make reinstall textproc/xmlcatmgr many times it also failed all the times ) Here I requesting anyone of you to help me to 1 provide the method to retrive the Desktop environment ? OR 2 Other wise how I can remove all the the things related to xserver (so that I have to install the Gnome 2.18 again as I did was portinstall /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 ) thanks in advance Dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Spice up your IM conversations. New, colorful and animated emoticons. Get chatting! http://server1.msn.co.in/SP05/emoticons/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:09:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6451D16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za (sirian.hst.org.za [209.203.2.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E3D13C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from localhost (localhost.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A4831DE26; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:09:57 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sirian.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60153-02; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:09:57 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEA531DE25; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:09:56 +0200 (SAST) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:13:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200706041537.11883.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20070611195419.GV20135@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20070611195419.GV20135@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706120913.17723.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hst.org.za Cc: "Michael P. Soulier" Subject: Re: debugging pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:09:30 -0000 On Monday 11 June 2007 21:54, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said: > > ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a decision > > made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly interactively. > > You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log > > Indeed. I turned up the logging and I had to turn it down before it filled > /var. :) > > If I could get it to log like that to the console, then I could supervise > it with runit, logging via svlogd. I guess there's no way to force that log > level to stdout? It looks as though set log local ... does what you want: check the manpage for ppp. Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:31:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E2116A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2BA13C45D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (vader.bytemobile.ondsl.gr [83.235.244.135]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l5C7Uhtc023602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:30:50 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5C7UKL1001568; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:30:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5BLeZSw002335; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:40:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:40:35 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20070611214035.GD2127@kobe.laptop> References: <424129.14768.qm@web57509.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <20070611162626.GA63738@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070611162626.GA63738@thought.org> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.43, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.47, BAYES_00 -2.60, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 0.50) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:02 -0000 On 2007-06-11 09:26, Gary Kline wrote: > Since I've used sendmail for a dozen years--largely by hit or > miss and following others' examples' let me add my two cents'. > A couple years ago I bought a (used) copy of SENDMAIL (by > O'Reilly, whose books are usually ++outstanding). I found the > book virtually useless. > > It may be only *me*, but when somebody explains something to > me, I get it. Reading 50 pages of dry text is like eating > sawdust, so if you can get one of the text-to-speech apps > going, having that read parts (or all) of the README might be a > big help. > > I see, down-queue, some helpful hints. I have a bunch of > cheat-sheet files; how-to's that have things spelled out in > cookbook form or in practical theory form--things that are > easily implementable. My SENDMAIL file is many pages. Maybe > it's worth editing and putting up.... As long as it's adequately commented, yes please do :-) I would at least try to skim through it, and see if I can learn interesting bits. Mostly because I was surprised to read ``many pages'' [i.e. my own Sendmail configuration is barely 4 printed pages of material, and more than half of them are comments]. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:31:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CC816A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EA813C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (vader.bytemobile.ondsl.gr [83.235.244.135]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l5C7Uhts023603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:30:50 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5C7UKL3001568; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:30:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5BLWqSv002281; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:32:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:32:51 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Bjorn Boulder Message-ID: <20070611213251.GC2127@kobe.laptop> References: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <144363.77113.qm@web57505.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.642, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.76, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD][Newb] How I use sendmail to send mail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:31:53 -0000 On 2007-06-10 21:25, Bjorn Boulder wrote: > Doug, Mats > > Your advice is on the money; thanks. > > I see this: > > Jun 10 05:43:40 jake sendmail[15068]: l5AAhekD015068: > to=bornboulder77@yahoo.com, ctladdr=oracle > (1004/1005), > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, > pri=30062, > relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, > stat=Deferred: Connection > refused by [127.0.0.1] > > Your tip along with that given by Mats suggests that > I need to learn about /etc/mail/sendmail.cf > > It appears that the box cannot send mail to itself: You are still missing important bits about Sendmail configuration on the FreeBSD operating system. Please read the `rc.sendmail' manpage VERY VERY carefully, and then tell us what you can see with: grep sendmail /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf > Currently, my main assumption is that /etc/mail/sendmail.cf is the > primary administrative interface for e-mail. This assumption is wrong. There is an Internet Email chapter in the FreeBSD Handbook. Have you checked it out? It's far from perfect, but it should help a bit. > I'll nose around via google. Make sure you also read the local manpages of your FreeBSD installation, and the Handbook... Especially the Handbook. After you read the `rc.sendmail' manpage and the Handbook chapter about Sendmail, please do not hesitate to tell us more details about your current Sendmail setup (including snippets from `/etc/rc.conf', or files from `/etc/mail'). Even if you have questions _while_ _still_ reading the documentation, feel free to ask. There are a lot of knowledgeable people on this list, and they can eagerly help you, but we can't really walk you -- using a long-winded email thread -- through all the tiny little steps of setting up your own Sendmail installation. Regards, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:35:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E4916A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117E713C484 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from gw2.local (gsaltd.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.127.200]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9E42B788B; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:04:52 +0100 (BST) From: "Greg Hennessy" To: , "'freebsd-pf'" References: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:04:51 +0100 Message-ID: <000301c7acbf$f8bac830$ea305890$@Hennessy@nviz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcesmmHaEvRMiXCpSfGmdB61tAhR9gAIfIHw Content-Language: en-gb X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000748-3, 11/06/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: RE: how 2 address&port map outbound traffic to multiple/different IPs on a single intfc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:35:38 -0000 > so, i think i'm in the right ballpark with *nat of some sort, but how > do i get this done correctly? > There's a number of ways to do this. Add the extra addresses as aliases to the internet facing interface. E.g gw2:~ # cat /etc/rc.early /etc/rc.conf | egrep -i 'outside|alias' | sed -e ..... /sbin/ifconfig rue0 name outside network_interfaces="lo0 outside inside" ifconfig_outside="inet xx.yy.zz.251 netmask 0xfffffff8 up" ifconfig_outside_alias0="inet xx.yy.zz.252 netmask 0xffffffff" ifconfig_outside_alias1="inet xx.yy.zz.253 netmask 0xffffffff" Or. If you have control of the upstream router from your firewall add static routes for either the entire cidr block or /32 host routes for each address in the /29 you control. The routes should point to the external address of the firewall. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:56:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3F516A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F1213C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:56:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5C7QOhn017307 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:24 +0300 Received: from MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (mx-in-03.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.26]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5C7QORR020436 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:24 +0300 Received: from athatmw01.forthnet.prv (athatmw01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.146]) by MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5C7QH2i024968 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:17 +0300 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr header.from=paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:17 +0300 Message-Id: <200706120726.l5C7QH2i024968@MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 From: To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: AtMail Corp 3.61 - https://webbasedemail.com/ X-Origin: 213.16.228.12 Cc: Subject: re X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:56:37 -0000 How can i do FreeBSD from RELEASE to RELEASE-security ? Thx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 08:07:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1242116A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BC913C45B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CE81C8A2C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:07:30 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: "Michael P. Soulier" Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:07:18 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200706041537.11883.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <20070611195419.GV20135@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20070611195419.GV20135@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121107.19492.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debugging pppoe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:07:33 -0000 On Monday 11 June 2007 22:54, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said: > > ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a > > decision made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly > > interactively. You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log > > Indeed. I turned up the logging and I had to turn it down before it > filled /var. :) > > If I could get it to log like that to the console, then I could > supervise it with runit, logging via svlogd. I am not familiar with these programs, but keep in mind that these methods may not be the best choice. FreeBSD and BSDs in general are very nicely integrated. The solution might (or not) be in the base system. > I guess there's no way to > force that log level to stdout? You guessed wrong:) From ppp(8): It is also possible to log directly to the screen. The syntax is the same except that the word ``local'' should immediately follow ``set log''. The default is ``set log local'' (i.e., only the un-maskable warning, error and alert output). Something else of possible interest is that ppp, can serve its console over a socket making remote debugging possible. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:21:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB0E16A51A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmalowsky@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF8E13C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmalowsky@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so116703uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l2OSsr5oiEWvlD/hBTDk+9nHrYiaRt8or0emLZBag3cOYTRX/wVfMOJR3aNQhrE8QO9UoJq4DmSrh5G5ExmOopjPUCnakbzqcSkzFWI7mEI4d+iWfA9wHbVikdmC5pZ8K5xT2vbUXrNvGs8ycSENUFGLe/wDY6M8oZDRtWP1CMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Tab5lfct1LxKMlgqhcZXoBtIIcpUWOsgEm0pQIWNyZZP4dtDtEqIQNYaoN9NgDvaM1yDvF3PamG7HWh2/AZ1M+iSORYySCsaGBW7ntmvhQH1iY9Wj1DNNbIiodjmJK5X0l3+FhgpJ8HPJGizPKqrmE5wXpqlg8fGJi5gknAomwg= Received: by 10.67.32.19 with SMTP id k19mr378046ugj.1181640114825; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.108.95? ( [62.245.145.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m60sm323390ugm.2007.06.12.02.21.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466E65B0.1080104@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:21:52 +0200 From: Axel Schmalowsky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: building exim on 6.2-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:56 -0000 How should I build exim such that it will not core dump when compiling with SPF? Are there any known problemes about exim and spf? Thanks in advance Regards Axel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:22:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1987116A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C010113C45E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F127D1DD38; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:57:28 +0300 (EEST) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7LluzBjqCXb2; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:57:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (c-900471d5.019-61-68617010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.113.4.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9D51CCBB; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:57:26 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: "Peter Pluta" References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:01:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:22:48 -0000 >> I see, I disabled bayes and awl in spamassassin, and updated >> amavisd-new >> from ports. I have a different problem. Mail I am sending out is >> being >> thrown away because it's being flagged as spam. I'm stumped, it >> never did >> this before. > >From memory, you can tell amavis which are your networks, so it >doesnt scan emails on the way out. (or maybe you tell postfix to > >only send the email via amavis on the way out, not in... i cant >remember nor check atm). If you use SASL authentication and Postfix, you can use the following postfix directive: smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes in main.cf in order to bypass the mail heading outside to be marked as spam. The directive above tells postfix to add information into headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was authenticated by the system and thus trusted. I needed the above as the system relays mail from authenticated users from outside the netblock the server resides. In addition Amavis can read the relay_domains database created for Postfix in defining what domains are OK to send and receive mail, using for example something like: read_hash(\%local_domains, '/usr/local/etc/postfix/relay_domains'); in amavisd.conf. Hope these help you! -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:29:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420DC16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A7F13C465 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5C9TIcb007715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5C9TImI088357; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: reko.turja@liukuma.net In-reply-to: <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> (reko.turja@liukuma.net) References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost> <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: peter@placidpublishing.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:24 -0000 > The directive above tells postfix to add information into > headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was > authenticated by the system and thus trusted. I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else that would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering. Beside, I am not sure it is a good measure to disable Amavis for any email. First goal of amavis is virus scanning, even a trusted/authenticated sender could have his machine infected and could be spreading viruses. My 2 cents. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:37:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571716A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516CD13C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 30310 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 09:21:47 -0000 Received: from 62.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg (HELO ?192.168.1.110?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@210.193.15.62) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 09:21:47 -0000 Message-ID: <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:37:34 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:37:25 -0000 Hello Lowell and Chuck, Thanks for the reply. What happens during the sending of any email, is that my Thunderbird will show 'Connected to mail.xyz.com...' for a couple of seconds. Bear in mind that my (test) mails are very short, so it can't be due to data transfer. After that the text says sending mail and stuff like that. All of which take rather insignificant time. The other thing that may be responsible is that my mail server does smtp authentication. But I don't really think this will be a culprit, as I have other mail clients that do local mail delivery only and hence do not need authentication. And these clients hit the same few-second wait as well. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks. Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jun 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Foo JH wrote: >> I'm using inetd + qmail to implement a mail server. The combo works, >> but usually sending a mail takes some 5-10 seconds. > >> I suspect it's largely because inetd or qmail is trying to do some >> dns lookup or something, before letting it through. Is there any way >> to shorten this process - if possible eliminate it altogether? >> >> Some time back, there was an advice to avoid inetd. It's probably a >> good idea, but I hope to deal with this first before moving forward >> on the setup. > > It's certainly possible to disable DNS lookups entirely, and that > might help reduce the delay you see, but in that case you'll have to > configure qmail to relay all mail to the equivalent of a sendmail > SMART_HOST (ie, to your ISP's SMTP relay), which performs MX lookups > and so forth instead of your local qmail doing so. > > It is only recommended to use an MTA spawned from inetd if your > traffic volume is very low-- probably well under 1000 messages/day. > If your traffic level is higher, you should run your MTA as a daemon > and not through inetd. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:42:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2A616A46D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8AB13C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343411DE19 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:39:23 +0300 (EEST) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id yWOAggZKHmoG for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:39:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (c-900471d5.019-61-68617010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.113.4.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1591CCBB for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:39:21 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <010101c7acd6$0f616b50$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" Cc: References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com><466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com><466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com><20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost><004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:42:57 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:42:56 -0000 >> The directive above tells postfix to add information into >> headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was >> authenticated by the system and thus trusted. > > I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else > that > would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering. > > Beside, I am not sure it is a good measure to disable Amavis for any > email. First goal of amavis is virus scanning, even a > trusted/authenticated sender could have his machine infected and > could > be spreading viruses. Using the header above of course implies that the machine running postfix will relay to amavis only on loopback, not via regular IP - or using other method that can be counted as secure. And of course for viruses authenticating via SASL using encrypted authentication and real user/password pair isn't usually successful :) IMHO mail gateway isn't the point of checking whether machines inside are virus free or not. There should be other practises used on workstations ensuring that the inside environment is virus free at any given moment. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:50:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A60416A46D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB03A13C48C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9841C9409; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:50:05 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:52 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:07 -0000 On Monday 11 June 2007 23:00, Erik Norgaard wrote: > My current setup is like this: > > 10.0.0/24 192.168.0/24 static IP > Wireless ))--- AP --- FreeBSD -------------- DSL ------------- Internet > many-1 1-1 > NAT NAT > [snip] > > For some bizare reason the ISP gateway is on a private LAN segment and > the mask doesn't include my assigned static IP - but maybe that's not a > problem? No, that's not a problem for point-to-point links. The two peer addresses can be totally unrelated. > > I can't figure out which protocol layers which in the internet > connection setup. > > - I have to configure PPPoE on the FreeBSD box? Yes, you can try ppp(8) which is very simple to setup. Search for pppoe label in /usr/share/examples/ppp/ppp.conf.sample Later on, you should also try using net/mpd4, which is a bit more difficult than ppp to setup. > - The 192.168.0/24 will not exactly disappear, but rather be like a > "dead end" that only works for communication with the router - which has > a web interface for configuration? Yes, but you will barely need to manage the DSL modem/router. The only thing you'll have to configure on the modem will be bridging(it may be called rfc1483-something), VPI and VCI. It will then bridge the VCI to its ethernet interface and that's the end of the story. Everything will be handled by the (FreeBSD) box which stands behind the modem. Most of the times you can omit the IP address from your PPPoE interface, as it will be used only for managing the modem. > - And the external interface will be a ppp0, not vr0 as currently? The external interface would be tunX or ngX(in case you are using mpd) Your vr0 interface will send/receive PPPoE frames to/from the modem. (And local IP (192.168.0/24) traffic for management purposes, if any) > > The DSL router in question is a Thomson Speedtouch 546v6. Speedtouch routers had as factory default bridging mode. A simple revert to factory defaults will probably enable you to use PPPoE from your FreeBSD box. It will probably have correct VPI/VCI setting for you country/internet provider. But, don't take my word for it. > Any hints, howtos or other on how to do this? Try ppp and send the list the results. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:50:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D80716A4A7 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8135D13C448 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5C9nrCs009435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:49:53 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5C9nrPB088807; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:49:53 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:49:53 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706120949.l5C9nrPB088807@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com In-reply-to: <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> (message from Foo JH on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:37:34 +0800) References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:50:10 -0000 > Thanks for the reply. What happens during the sending of any email, is > that my Thunderbird will show 'Connected to mail.xyz.com...' for a > couple of seconds. Bear in mind that my (test) mails are very short, so > it can't be due to data transfer. After that the text says sending mail > and stuff like that. All of which take rather insignificant time. > > The other thing that may be responsible is that my mail server does smtp > authentication. But I don't really think this will be a culprit, as I > have other mail clients that do local mail delivery only and hence do > not need authentication. And these clients hit the same few-second wait > as well. Do you receive email from outside world on this machine? Do you think there is the same delay? How do you notice the delay? After Thunderbird mentionned that the email was successfully sent, you immdiately try to get new email from your inbox and it takles time? How big is your inbox? What mailbox format are you using? Are the disk local or network mounted? How much loaded is your machine? How many emails do you receive at time? Do you read with pop or imap? Are pop/imap launched by inetd or they are daemonized? Do you have any anti virus/spam facility? Do you implement some fancy MDA like procmail? Remember that email is not instant messaging, but store and forward: it is a slow and batch processing, it is dessign to support delay and certainly the design should generate some. If the delay remains 5 seconds when your server process 1 or 10000 messages per hour, then there is nothing to worry about. Authentication should effect only to sending, it deals with the communication between Thunderbird and qmail. It has nothing to do with reading your mailbox and should have nothing to do with the in between delay. Bests, olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 09:54:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E734216A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669CF13C458 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5C9sNTB009660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:23 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5C9sMo2088924; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:22 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:22 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706120954.l5C9sMo2088924@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: reko.turja@liukuma.net In-reply-to: <010101c7acd6$0f616b50$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> (reko.turja@liukuma.net) References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com><466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com><466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com><20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost><004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <010101c7acd6$0f616b50$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:54:25 -0000 > IMHO mail gateway isn't the point of checking whether machines inside > are virus free or not. There should be other practises used on > workstations ensuring that the inside environment is virus free at any > given moment. There should be. But there are also users that decide to use their own XYZ anti virus because their uncle told them it is better than the one choosen by the professionals in charge of the system. That is why outgoing mail gateway is a good place to check that inside machines are not infected. I once got my email outgoing gateway inform me that some user had his machine infected, he had an antivirus, but was one week late for update... At least my outgoing mail gateway, I have control on it and the antiviruses are updated every 2 hours :) Security is better design by adding several layer of checking. At least IMHO too :) Bests, olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 10:36:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020AA16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E8813C45B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.144] (helo=anti-virus03-07) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Hy3k4-0004wY-QB; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:36:52 +0100 Received: from [62.31.10.181] (helo=[192.168.23.2]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Hy3XC-0007GM-DI; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: <466E7426.3060905@dial.pipex.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:23:34 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Tolbert References: <20070607204129.GA45269@just.puresimplicity.net> <466937C6.1010306@dial.pipex.com> <20070612034110.GA95034@just.puresimplicity.net> In-Reply-To: <20070612034110.GA95034@just.puresimplicity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o strangeness... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:36:55 -0000 Josh Tolbert wrote: >On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > >>Josh Tolbert wrote: >> >> >> >>>(15:38:21 ) $ pkg_info | grep bison >>>bison-1.75_2,1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with >>>Yacc >>>(15:38:30 ) $ sudo portupgrade -o devel/bison2 bison >>>(15:38:34 ) $ sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison >>>---> Reinstalling 'bison-1.75_2,1' (devel/bison) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Have you tried "sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/bison2 bison" in case it's >>some bug in parsing merged options? Worth a PR in any case... >> >>Failing that you could just pkg_delete bison and install bison2 afresh. >>You shouldn't have to but... >> >>--Alex >> >> > >Hi Alex, > >Yes, I did exactly that. Take a look at the example above. :) > > It doesn't look like what I was suggesting is the issue so it's all moot, but the example I can see: sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison is different from what I was suggesting: sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/bison2 bison which deliberately split -f and -o. Your original version could reasonably be expected to work, but I have seen software (even written some :-)) which does not correctly parse flags when they are combined ("-fo") especially when one of them also takes an argument. That's not what's happening here, but my suggestion was always a shot in the dark. >Anyway, a PR has been filed and the response is, "it's a feature." I'm not >sure how it's a feature, but it is. The example I was given looks like this: > >$ pkg_version -t 2.3_1 1.75_2,1 >< > >I'm guessing it's just doing some odd string comparison instead of breaking >the version number apart and handling it with weight on the major version >number, etc. > > I find it bizarre too, since I don't even understand *why* the version numbers matter in that command line. You've said "upgrade using devel/bison2" as the origin and it's upgrading using "devel/bison". I could understand the version number bizarre-matching affecting *whether* portupgrade chooses to upgrade (so requiring -f) but not that it fails to honour the origin you've given. The pkg_version comparison is surely just wrong. The version numbers look correct to me. Interestingly, if you drop the ,1 from the second version, the answer is correct (on 5.4 anyway). $ pkg_version -t 2.3_1 1.75_2 > Or add a comma to the first $ pkg_version -t 2.3_1,1 1.75_2,1 > which looks like a bug to me, but maybe there's something non-standard about that version number. Blowed if I can see what; there are plenty of examples like it in my installed packages. There's definitely a bug in something. Software, bah. --Alex PS Presumably deinstalling bison and installing bison2 worked OK as a workaround? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 11:39:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A192916A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deadmanxia@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6121013C45A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deadmanxia@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so497134anc for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=MheJZE1s5A6Gu5Qn5ommHAnoM9k2KXKjv0mw4oi2Cz8sRgxwHinQCXa9oEs1qhr8f67VEN8cPEMiJwXWfpuq6ktrGukENQWX2yJSGCXMdZ8OeQYm/zw/5241/iEiG0LsW0cZp3IoBqWdkkGX0WobOAFlEuPB2Qx2NBxzV3F9yug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nfhc2IGzn8ua7/yU49JIvNDdTUxK0At2G8cWp6jHYzID079nudfKG0xgm4hAjZIPzmWa2qbbyc391MqHlv2Zs2UQJAf1x1fAJCTuNZGojcALpmeq7KfhSr9lS901CwDPjOQBhcvcodjHOHjK3wY4yvlPVxF5kvlo4cAaZqyj6tk= Received: by 10.100.13.12 with SMTP id 12mr3923842anm.1181648349496; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.120.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:39:09 -0700 From: "DeadMan Xia ...." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Email Sending Problem to YAHOO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:39:10 -0000 Hi everybody!!!!! hope all doing fine ,,,, well i have configured my Email Server on FreeBSD 6.2 with Qmail, i have send email to yahoo, hotmail & gmail. On gmail & hotmail, its works quick, bt at yahoo ,,, its delaying nd mail recieved at yahoo with huge delays. wen i send email to yahoo, it gives following defferal error, @40000000466e85af2e894abc delivery 12: deferral: Connected_to_216.39.53.1_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( 58.65.151.33 )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- 06.html/ @40000000466e85af2e8bb3ec status: local 0/10 remote 1/255 @40000000466e85b000c37904 delivery 13: deferral: Connected_to_66.196.97.250_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( 58.65.151.33 )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- 06.html/ @40000000466e85b000c57ca4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 Kindly Help me out in fixing such probelm ,,,,, regards Xia .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 12:16:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A8F16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj@hcl-club.lu) Received: from 0b10111.de (hcl-club.lu [62.75.155.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F152513C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaj@hcl-club.lu) Received: from localhost (4be54-4-82-234-154-189.fbx.proxad.net [82.234.154.189]) by 0b10111.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9747872C2DE for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:16:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:16:29 +0200 From: Jona Joachim To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070612141629.6237fbd6@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: &>dujC`JZV!}?Y^1"%N{x!f+rW}; PX\_Cg[!|MA~tn3ebIKM|~p=,,U~YJt,Exd`Spk.1Ln zg, Q]0=:!/LTs-eg.Fz, @giLyD'D=s, L\-AJyZ8tcV`kPifedMA@rhoEikoo~K%@iDLNq2?aHZjIt) GqBY7o#9+8j/uuXDVG3`XFEH_4$T%._*%;|vIaP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Email Sending Problem to YAHOO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:35 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:39:09 -0700 "DeadMan Xia ...." wrote: > Hi everybody!!!!! > > hope all doing fine ,,,, > well i have configured my Email Server on FreeBSD 6.2 with Qmail, i > have send email to yahoo, hotmail & gmail. On gmail & hotmail, its > works quick, bt at yahoo ,,, its delaying nd mail recieved at yahoo > with huge delays. wen i send email to yahoo, it gives following > defferal error, > > @40000000466e85af2e894abc delivery 12: deferral: > Connected_to_216.39.53.1_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( > 58.65.151.33 > )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- > 06.html/ > @40000000466e85af2e8bb3ec status: local 0/10 remote 1/255 > @40000000466e85b000c37904 delivery 13: deferral: > Connected_to_66.196.97.250_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( > 58.65.151.33 > )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- > 06.html/ > @40000000466e85b000c57ca4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 > > Kindly Help me out in fixing such probelm ,,,,, The error message mentions a url. Perhaps you can find more information there. Perhaps this is interesting to you: http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/original/abuse/abuse-60.html Jona -- "I am chaos. I am the substance from which your artists and scientists build rhythms. I am the spirit with which your children and clowns laugh in happy anarchy. I am chaos. I am alive, and tell you that you are free." Eris, Goddess Of Chaos, Discord & Confusion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 12:50:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5351116A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham.potts@americangolf.co.uk) Received: from mail183.messagelabs.com (mail183.messagelabs.com [62.231.131.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C4E413C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham.potts@americangolf.co.uk) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: graham.potts@americangolf.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-183.messagelabs.com!1181651036!3699357!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.11; banners=americangolf.co.uk,-,- X-Originating-IP: [80.40.126.163] Received: (qmail 23978 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 12:23:56 -0000 Received: from tamarin.americangolf.co.uk (HELO tamarin.americangolf.co.uk) (80.40.126.163) by server-7.tower-183.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 12:23:56 -0000 Received: from grahampotts by americangolf.co.uk (MDaemon.PRO.v7.1.0.R) with ESMTP id md50003755728.msg for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:23:52 +0100 From: "Graham Potts" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:23:47 +0100 Message-ID: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Aces7ITXvYsx205zTGu3KmXmGvHaDg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Processed: tamarin.americangolf.co.uk, Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:23:52 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: graham.potts@americangolf.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-MDAV-Processed: tamarin.americangolf.co.uk, Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:23:56 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:50:40 -0000 I seem to be having trouble with spam from your email servers - I have been receiving emails from your mailing list for some time now. The problem is that I do not want them, nor have I ever asked for them. Despite sending 4 requests to the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails, I am STILL receiving them! Please remove my address from this mailing list immediately. Thank you Graham Graham Potts I.T. Development & Support Consultant Warning: May Contain Nuts ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 12:55:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C1516A46E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2762813C4BD for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1532446wxd for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.35.1 with SMTP id i1mr10320900wxi.1181652921969; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h20sm9560987wxd.2007.06.12.05.55.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:55:54 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom.NET X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] Subject: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:55:23 -0000 I have had nothing but grief since updating to the new Xorg-7.2 version on my PC. Unexplained crashes, lockups, etc. No doubt, some of the problems are my fault; however I cannot seem to get them corrected. Now, I was wondering how this would work. 1) Download a fresh ISO of FreeBSD-6.2 on to another PC 2) Erase my HDs on the PC presently running FBSD 3) Reformat the HDs 4) Install the fresh copy of FBSD Will that give me a system that I can directly install Xorg-7.2 on to or do I still have to go through the procedure shown in the "UPDATING" file? Suppose I install Xorg-7.2 doing the actual install of FBSD; will that make any difference? In any case, I would build a new kernel ASAP after the new install. Thanks! -- Gerard Useless 'Fact of the Day' If bill gates put his fortune in dollar bills under his mattress and fell off, it would take him 6 1/2 minutes to hit the ground. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:01:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA5F16A474 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349BC13C45E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA07EBC78; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:01:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:01:00 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Graham Potts" Message-Id: <20070612090100.079802a9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> References: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:01:04 -0000 In response to "Graham Potts" : > I seem to be having trouble with spam from your email servers - I have been > receiving emails from your mailing list for some time now. The problem is > that I do not want them, nor have I ever asked for them. Despite sending 4 > requests to the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails, I am STILL > receiving them! > > > > Please remove my address from this mailing list immediately. Some email addresses to contact that are more likely to be helpful are freebsd-questions-owner@freebsd.org, or postmaster@freebsd.org. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:31:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7191216A46C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B7D13C4C7; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37DF12CE; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:31:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:31:34 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: DLAtmTi064jP+/EkwTka0efB/bCdTLxxl3LydhuygXpU 1181655094 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB59244D7; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:31:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> References: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--663054055"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <8945500B-A730-477F-A232-16C9AE54344A@goldmark.org> From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:31:24 -0500 To: Graham Potts X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:31:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1--663054055 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed [I'm cc'ing this to owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org and mailman@freebsd.org in the hopes that someone involved in managing the list will help investigate] On Jun 12, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Graham Potts wrote: > I seem to be having trouble with spam from your email servers - I > have been > receiving emails from your mailing list for some time now. The > problem is > that I do not want them, nor have I ever asked for them. I'm just a member of the mailing list and have no access to mail system set up. But I do run mailman lists of my own (on my own servers), so I hope that I can be of some help. First of all what you describe "shouldn't happen". That is no comfort to you who see it happening, but the mailing list system is designed to prevent exactly what you describe. However, you are not the first person to report this happening to them in recent months. Indeed, for reasons unknown the freebsd.org mailing list server has gotten itself onto a blacklist, and the kind of problem you report may be the reason. The way the subscription process is supposed to work is that a confirmation request is sent to the address being subscribed. The confirmation request contains a unique token. The person who receives that confirmation request must respond to it (either by following a particular web link or by replying to the confirmation request email) before they will be added to the list. Here is some wild speculation about what might be the cause of the problem. (1) You did positively respond to a confirmation request, but just don't recall doing so. Note that if you have email addresses which forwards to your address it may have been that address which was subscribed. Note: > Despite sending 4 > requests to the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails, I am > STILL > receiving them! The fact that the normal unsubscribe process is failing for you suggests that the subscribed address is not the one that you normally send mail from, but one that forwards to you. I see from your .sig that you are an IT consultant. If mail to say, postmaster@one.of.your.clients gets automatically copied to you, then it is more than possible that postmaster@one.of.your.clients subscribed to the list at some point. So my first suggestion is to try to figure out what address is actually subscribed that is getting to you. There are two ways to do this. One is to look at the monthly subscription reminders. Each month, each individual subscribed address should get an individualized subscription reminder. That will contain what address is actually subscribed. Chances are you haven't saved any of those, and I doubt that you would want to wait until 1 July to get things sorted out. The second method is by studying the full headers of mail that is sent to you via the list. If you are not familiar with examining full headers, please ask for more help from either me personally or from the list. There are other things that could cause the problem. Most involve either some misconfiguration of the mailing list system or a security breach. (Mailman uses some pretty low security systems). But before exploring those, it makes most sense to first figure out which address is really subscribed (which is information that will be needed to unsubscribe you whether done by you or by the list administrators). Also, could you let us know when you first started getting mail to the list? That might also help pinpoint the problem. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ --Apple-Mail-1--663054055-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:36:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD9A16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA4F13C44B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy6Wd-0006O4-OE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:35:13 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy6Rj-00011V-Mw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:30:08 +0100 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5CDTMZK070911 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from shterenl@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5CDTLo6070910 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: shterenl set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:21 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070612132921.GA70847@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: well done xorg porters!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:36:01 -0000 Having looked through various messages complaing about the latest xorg, I'd like to say a big thankyou to all those who wrote the xorg port, much appreciated. It was clearly a significant undertaking. As usual, thorough quidelines, easy installation, nice merging script. Works fine on my PIII compaq armada 2GB disk laptop under FBSD 6.2-stable. well done! The only other thing I'd like to see would be some additional build options to choose something like the minimum config, e.g. only the minimum required fonts. thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:44:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFA816A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:44:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB20A13C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schneecrash@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1222898wra for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m43ZPMpbAjJds2MFJ/RZOzbbxzOo+MFP7JHjQmZe/UkREf/aNpKxK4Tbi/CY4+/1yFNG9uGTuqHvb6YkgjsXLtzZkirzylZQJhF75PFP3WIsnGaGEQ/5A5aJkoKFZg7Z/QSQDOtvbrrRsvRa+dYbyMUkjGYZ0Ioq+x7xuQSzI08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UTPR/8ClvQkavYQgnEXjbLy1dv++V0q4e63Hk+UN7p9D+xSgGrfGJmI0+1ubenTI/HEUU4V5YF9JuDmsMXl4Qk7UW3RENxgrhRnKiGwGShc6QZ3IA83tJKzb1qj//H8CbPkyK2y+1g0Qj3s9TKC+Bgw4unCnj3lx6EGOznTqUJ0= Received: by 10.90.50.1 with SMTP id x1mr6393184agx.1181655862204; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.50.6 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70f41ba20706120644y401ee52bpe2baaf4d8c9753ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:44:22 -0700 From: snowcrash To: "Greg Hennessy" In-Reply-To: <781957739614121600@unknownmsgid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> <781957739614121600@unknownmsgid> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf Subject: Re: how 2 address&port map outbound traffic to multiple/different IPs on a single intfc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: schneecrash@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:44:23 -0000 hi greg, > There's a number of ways to do this. > > Add the extra addresses as aliases to the internet facing interface. E.g > > gw2:~ # cat /etc/rc.early /etc/rc.conf | egrep -i 'outside|alias' | sed -e > ..... > /sbin/ifconfig rue0 name outside > network_interfaces="lo0 outside inside" > ifconfig_outside="inet xx.yy.zz.251 netmask 0xfffffff8 up" > ifconfig_outside_alias0="inet xx.yy.zz.252 netmask 0xffffffff" > ifconfig_outside_alias1="inet xx.yy.zz.253 netmask 0xffffffff" i am using aliases, but, atm, only for INTERNAL addresses on the router/firewall. e.g., in rc.conf, int_if = "sis0" lo_if = "lo0" ifconfig_sis0="inet x.x.x.80 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" ifconfig_sis0_alias0="x.x.x.81 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" ifconfig_sis0_alias1="x.x.x.82 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" ifconfig_sis0_alias2="x.x.x.83 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" ifconfig_sis0_alias3="x.x.x.84 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492 polling" dhcpd_ifaces="sis0" the $ext_if, "tun0" (pppoe) is not created UNTIL ppp launches -- later. so, iiuc -- which i may well not -- setting aliases for the ext intfc would NOT work in rc.conf (early), but only (later) after ppp int'd the alias ... don't know what issues that causes for maintaining any/all required synchronization with pf ... which would be expecting/addressing those external intfc aliases on startup. so, don't think this is a viable option :-/ unless ... > Or. If you have control of the upstream router from your firewall add > static routes for either the entire cidr block or /32 host routes for each > address in the /29 you control. > > The routes should point to the external address of the firewall. aha. i assume you really DO mean the upstream router here, NOT any router capabilities ON the firewall box itself, yes? if so, after pppoe setup/connect, ifconfig shows, tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet x.x.x.1 --> aa.bb.cc.dd netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 511 and the upstream router, aa.bb.cc.dd, is my ISP's. checking established routes, as per in "ppp.conf", add default HISADDR checking routes, i see the one, netstat -nr | grep aa.bb.cc.dd default aa.bb.cc.dd UGS 0 19 tun0 aa.bb.cc.dd x.x.x.1 UH 1 3 tun0 now, looking at that, i suspect i MIGHT be able to add add'l routes in the ppp.conf transaction config -- e.g., instead of (just?) add default HISADDR add something 'like' set ifaddr x.x.x.1 x.x.x.2 x.x.x.3 255.255.255.255 add x.x.x.0/29 HISADDR but, i have to search/fumble around with the correct pppoe-time syntax. i assume that this would (?) set up additional external intfcs, which would then be pf-addressable? thoughts? thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:45:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1917416A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E852713C48C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C44215F3 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:45:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:45:10 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: XQs77K/y8VkVQ7kXT9rc/vW5QHi1zBZ1rPb+OxdYOPJP 1181655910 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7E32AB8E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:45:10 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:45:08 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Coordinating dhcpd and bind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:45:11 -0000 For some local networks, I run dhcpd using assigning fixed IP address based on the client MAC. I am also running bind for the local networks. At some sites where I am doing this, I'm using webmin for maintaining DNS (or I actually have my clients doing this). I've don't use or recommend webmin for DHCPd since I've just had too many problems with it, so that is maintained by hand. Naturally I'd like to coordinate this activity. When a new host is added, it would be nice to ensure that the name and IP assigned in DHCP is the same that is done with DNS. I could write my own script for this, but I'm sure that similar scripts have been written a thousand times, 980 of which are better than I would write. Is there anything in ports or elsewhere that people could recommend. (Some of the sites where I need this are mostly Linux based, but will be moving to FreeBSD over time). -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:54:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3827816A46E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5C513C487 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net [195.137.21.170]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0056538B1; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:54:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5CDsFFI028806; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:54:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5CDsFM0028805; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:54:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:54:15 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: Graham Potts Message-ID: <20070612135415.GA28750@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: Graham Potts , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:54:17 -0000 Hi, On Tuesday, 12 June, 2007 at 13:23:47 +0100, Graham Potts wrote: > I seem to be having trouble with spam from your email servers - I have been > receiving emails from your mailing list for some time now. The problem is > that I do not want them, nor have I ever asked for them. Despite sending 4 > requests to the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails, I am STILL > receiving them! Have you at anytime actually subscribed to this list? If so, did you attempt to unsubscribe from the same email address? I ask this because it may be that a third party is sending the list mail to you. The only way to determine this is for you to send a example of the mail you are receiving _including_ the _complete_ headers to the mailing list maintainers. They ought to be able to sort this out for you. Of course, if there is a third party involved the mailing list maintainers may not be able to help you. Cheers, Nick. -- Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Please send your reply to the list only. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:05:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C73C16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DC113C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5CE5WDM003959; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l5CE5VGk003956; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Reko Turja In-Reply-To: <010101c7acd6$0f616b50$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> Message-ID: <20070612074536.B3604@wonkity.com> References: <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com><466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com><466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com><20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost><004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <010101c7acd6$0f616b50$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:32 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin RBL's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:33 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Reko Turja wrote: > IMHO mail gateway isn't the point of checking whether machines inside are > virus free or not. There should be other practises used on workstations > ensuring that the inside environment is virus free at any given moment. It's impossible to guarantee that the LAN machines are virus-free at any given time, particularly if they run Windows or are portable and move in and out of the LAN. The idea of virus-checking outgoing email isn't to tell whether LAN machines are infected, but to prevent abuse of other networks and possible loss of connectivity because a virus got through the first-line defenses. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:08:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C8316A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reply@mymarketing.co.il) Received: from mmmailgw04.mymarketing.co.il (mmmailgw04.mymarketing.co.il [194.90.201.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F005C13C480 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reply@mymarketing.co.il) SUBMITTER: reply@mymarketing.co.il Received: from mmmailgw04.mymarketing.co.il ([192.168.19.204]) by activetrail.com (activetrail.com) X-BBounce: 13907449|55449|freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG|1|0|237|1 From: "Paragon-Conventions" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Message-ID: <0cd6092db3c446e597a6c25a67b1eb8b@paragon-conventions.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:08:33 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: XVI- World IFTA Congress, 26-29 March, 2008, Porto, Portugal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:08:38 -0000 If= you can not see this email properly, please [1]cli= ck here [www=2Eparagon-convention=] [2]3D"ice207 3D"ice207 3Deof Dear Colleagues The International Family Therapy Association has announced that its = 16th World Family Therapy Congress will be held in Porto, Portugal Marc= h 26-29, 2008=2E The congress theme is Transformation and Globaliza= tion: Family Therapy in the 21st Century=2E The World Family Therapy Congress has a rich history of bringing tog= ether the greatest clinicians from around the world and we invite you t= o submit an abstract for consideration for the congress program=2E This= congress will explore how family therapy contributes to the changes be= ing experienced by families worldwide; the impact of post-modernism on = the field; and Intimacy, Desire, and Domesticity=2E In addition to the = traditional workshops and paper sessions, we encourage potential speake= rs to propose creative experiences for participants that will increase = opportunities for learning and networking=2E The deadline for abstracts= in October 31, 2007 and all abstracts must be submitted online at [3]www=2Epar= agon-conventions=2Ecom/ifta2008=2E We expect Porto to be one of our most successful congresses ever and= have made sure that the locale and venue provide ample opportunities f= or learning, sharing, and networking=2E We hope that you will consider = being a speaker in Porto and submit an abstract=2E [ifta=] =20 [4]Important dates Deadline for submission of Abstracts October 31, 2007 [ifta2=] Early registration November 30, 2007= [5]Topics 3Ddfg Congress theme: Transformation and Globalizations: Family Therapy in the 2= 1st Century=2E=20 The sub-themes: The Global Family in Flux; Intimacy, Desire, and Domestic= ity; and Family Therapy in a Post-Modern World=2E ORGANIZERS Paragon Conventions 3Ddfg 18 Avenue Louis-Casai 5th floor 1= 209 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 7477930 E-mail: [6]ilev@paragon-conventio= ns=2Ecom Website: [7]www=2Eparagon-convention= s=2Ecom [8]Join Our Mailing List 3Ddfg We can update you wi= th upcoming news and changes=2E Just [9]click here we will send you news and updates [10][mailing=] = 3D= [www=2Eparagon-convention=] <= /TR> if you can't see the page click [11]www=2Eparagon-conventions=2Ecom/ifta2008/mailin= g/ifta08_01=2Ehtml _________________________________________________________________ [ico-print=2Egif"] [12]Click here to print this Page [0X47C23A5C2806C37=] To remove yourself from= the mailing list please [13]click here = Powered by [14]ActiveTrail=2Ecom=2E<= br> References Visible links 1. 3D"http://www=2Ewe=/ 2. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X= 3. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X2D1= 4. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links= 5. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links= 6. 3D"mailto:ilev@paragon-conventions=2Ecom" 7. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X707FCFB59A48030D3E= 8. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X1A6A4E152B463315B2184= 9. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-vi=/ 10. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X7F= 11. 3D"http://tra=/ 12. 3D"http://www=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Print/0X47C2= 13. 3D'http://www=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Out_0X4= 14. 3D'http://www=2Eactivetrail=2Ecom/' Hidden links: 15. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Link= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:26:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3016A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7563313C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CELvwA006782; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:21:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CELvQk006781; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:21:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:21:57 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Neil Short Message-ID: <20070612142157.GA6704@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <297981.1537.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <297981.1537.qm@web56505.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backspace problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:26:57 -0000 > > Scott Mayo wrote: > .... > If I hit backspace it just backs up on the line until > were input-mode > was started during this input-mode session. If I hit > delete then it > capitalizes the charcter behind the cursor and throws > me into > command-mode. You just need to get it configured right. For some things I need to do something like CTRL-BACKSPACE instead of regular BACKSPACE or other variations in certain circumstances. But, I get what I need with the defaults (nothing special), so I haven't bothered to learn the keyboard config and vi config, etc stuff, but it is there and people make them do whatever they want. If you really want, you can make it remap however you want. But, you will probably have to do some research on keyboard remapping and vi, and command line config, etc. ////jerry > .... > > === > This way to get things to delete in vi seems odd to > me. > I have always used 'x' to delete from the right, and > "X" to delete from the left. Maybe some hacks of vi > include alternative methods to navigate. The problem > with learning a method using shortcuts is that the > "pure" method becomes unnatural and difficult. vi > becomes real useful once you start doing things in it > by reflex. If your reflexes are of the pure method > then you should be good from one vi to the next. Even > in my case, using the arrow keys seems more natural > for jumping around (than using the jkl and ; keys). > This is even more true for me since I use the Dvorak > keyboard layoun and j, k, l and ; are not close > together (well, j and k are -- and l and ; are too; > but still not quick or easy to use for navigation.) > > Maybe the vim port in the ports collection will bring > you completeness in your OS experience. > > ====== > Because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the human heart is fully set to do evil. > Ecclesiastes 8:11 > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:29:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A692816A47E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [68.77.126.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5416D13C484 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CETrjO037537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CETq35037536; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:52 -0500 From: Josh Tolbert To: Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: <20070612142952.GA37242@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20070607204129.GA45269@just.puresimplicity.net> <466937C6.1010306@dial.pipex.com> <20070612034110.GA95034@just.puresimplicity.net> <466E7426.3060905@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466E7426.3060905@dial.pipex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (just.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:29:53 -0500 (CDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o strangeness... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:29:55 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > It doesn't look like what I was suggesting is the issue so it's all > moot, but the example I can see: > > sudo portupgrade -fo devel/bison2 bison > > is different from what I was suggesting: > > sudo portupgrade -f -o devel/bison2 bison > > which deliberately split -f and -o. Your original version could reasonably > be expected to work, but I have seen software (even written some :-)) which > does not correctly parse flags when they are combined ("-fo") especially > when one of them also takes an argument. That's not what's happening here, > but my suggestion was always a shot in the dark. > > >Anyway, a PR has been filed and the response is, "it's a feature." I'm not > >sure how it's a feature, but it is. The example I was given looks like > >this: > > > >$ pkg_version -t 2.3_1 1.75_2,1 > >< > > > >I'm guessing it's just doing some odd string comparison instead of breaking > >the version number apart and handling it with weight on the major version > >number, etc. > > > > > I find it bizarre too, since I don't even understand *why* the version > numbers matter in that command line. You've said "upgrade using > devel/bison2" as the origin and it's upgrading using "devel/bison". I > could understand the version number bizarre-matching affecting *whether* > portupgrade chooses to upgrade (so requiring -f) but not that it fails > to honour the origin you've given. > > The pkg_version comparison is surely just wrong. The version numbers > look correct to me. Interestingly, if you drop the ,1 from the second > version, the answer is correct (on 5.4 anyway). > > $ pkg_version -t 2.3_1 1.75_2 > > > > Or add a comma to the first > > $ pkg_version -t 2.3_1,1 1.75_2,1 > > > > > which looks like a bug to me, but maybe there's something non-standard > about that version number. Blowed if I can see what; there are plenty > of examples like it in my installed packages. > > There's definitely a bug in something. > > Software, bah. > > --Alex > > PS Presumably deinstalling bison and installing bison2 worked OK as a > workaround? I didn't try separate options for -f and -o. I've always just ran single-letter options together and never had any issues. I'd be surprised if that were the problem. I ended up going back to portupgrade from portupgrade-devel and everything seemed to work fine. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. -- Helen Keller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:33:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3026F16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BEB13C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ACBA086F; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:33:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <466EAEAB.9030608@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:33:15 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeffrey Goldberg References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coordinating dhcpd and bind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:33:22 -0000 Written by Jeffrey Goldberg on 06/12/07 08:45>> > For some local networks, I run dhcpd using assigning fixed IP address > based on the client MAC. I am also running bind for the local > networks. At some sites where I am doing this, I'm using webmin for > maintaining DNS (or I actually have my clients doing this). I've don't > use or recommend webmin for DHCPd since I've just had too many problems > with it, so that is maintained by hand. > > Naturally I'd like to coordinate this activity. When a new host is > added, it would be nice to ensure that the name and IP assigned in DHCP > is the same that is done with DNS. > > I could write my own script for this, but I'm sure that similar scripts > have been written a thousand times, 980 of which are better than I would > write. Is there anything in ports or elsewhere that people could > recommend. > > (Some of the sites where I need this are mostly Linux based, but will be > moving to FreeBSD over time). > > -j > > Sounds like you want to use dynamic DNS updates. I put a howto for this on bsdforums: http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=260530 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:38:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7031C16A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@troback.com) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63913C44B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@troback.com) Received: from server25.gelita.swe (212-162-182-242.skbbip.com [212.162.182.242]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CF510FB8F; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:25 +0200 From: Anders Troback To: Laszlo Nagy Message-ID: <20070612161425.39f5d246@server25.gelita.swe> In-Reply-To: <4666F7BC.50803@shopzeus.com> References: <46667240.6030604@janh.de> <4666F7BC.50803@shopzeus.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Troback-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@troback.com for more information X-Troback-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Troback-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.398, required 3.2, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00) X-Troback-MailScanner-From: freebsd@troback.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdesktop: segmentation fault under xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:38:10 -0000 On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:06:52 +0200 Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > > youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > >> > >>> For me, rdesktop works -- I have all my ports upgraded... > >> > >> ldd `which rdesktop` says? > > > > /usr/local/bin/rdesktop: > > libcrypto.so.4 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x280a9000) > > libX11.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x2819c000) > > libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28282000) > > libXau.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28367000) > > libXdmcp.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x2836a000) > > librpcsvc.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x2836f000) > > > > Jan Henrik > For me, this is a bit different: >=20 > %ldd `which rdesktop` > /usr/local/bin/rdesktop: > libcrypto.so.4 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x280a0000) > libX11.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28193000) > libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28279000) > libXau.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x2835e000) > libXdmcp.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x28361000) > librpcsvc.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x28366000) >=20 > Although the file names are the same. Is this a problem? >=20 > Laszlo Hi, I have the same problem here after the xorg upgrade! And here are my ldd `which rdesktop`: /usr/local/bin/rdesktop: libcrypto.so.4 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x280a9000) libX11.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x2819c000) libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28282000) libXau.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28369000) libXdmcp.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x2836c000) librpcsvc.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x28371000) --=20 Anders Trob=E4ck http://www.troback.com/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" -------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:41:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE54F16A4E1 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EE513C4B8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CEZwWK006909; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:35:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CEZvRV006908; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:35:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:35:57 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr Message-ID: <20070612143557.GC6704@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <200706120726.l5C7QH2i024968@MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706120726.l5C7QH2i024968@MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:08 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:26:17AM +0300, paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr wrote: > > How can i do FreeBSD from RELEASE to RELEASE-security ? Thx > If I understand what you mean, just csup the RELEASE version or maybe preferably the major version eg. *default tag=RELENG_6_2 or preferably *default tag=RELENG_6 in your supfile. Although feature additions and non-security fixes are not added back to the RELEASE, I think security fixes are. Anyway they are to the major version. And while you are at it, you will probably also want to csup your ports tree and the documentation. That would be ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. in your supfile. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:43:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F8F16A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6AE13C4B8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C21D51937 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:43:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:52 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070612154352.50a24bad@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:43:57 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:55:54 -0400 Gerard wrote: > I have had nothing but grief since updating to the new Xorg-7.2 > version on my PC. Unexplained crashes, lockups, etc. No doubt, some of > the problems are my fault; however I cannot seem to get them > corrected. I had a few problems like that, but they went away after a week or so of picking-up upgrades. In particular doing a forced update of nvidia-driver and its dependencies fixed a few of the problems. > Now, I was wondering how this would work. > > 1) Download a fresh ISO of FreeBSD-6.2 on to another PC > 2) Erase my HDs on the PC presently running FBSD > 3) Reformat the HDs > 4) Install the fresh copy of FBSD > > Will that give me a system that I can directly install Xorg-7.2 on to > or do I still have to go through the procedure shown in the "UPDATING" > file? Suppose I install Xorg-7.2 doing the actual install of FBSD; > will that make any difference? Before you install xorg, create a /usr/X11R6 directory and run the mergebase script which will update any references to /usr/X11R6 that are in the base system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:48:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACA516A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1647613C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5CElwLR018152; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:48:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:47:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:48:01 -0000 On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:55:54 am Gerard wrote: > I have had nothing but grief since updating to the new Xorg-7.2 > version on my PC. Unexplained crashes, lockups, etc. No doubt, some of > the problems are my fault; however I cannot seem to get them corrected. > > Now, I was wondering how this would work. > > 1) Download a fresh ISO of FreeBSD-6.2 on to another PC > 2) Erase my HDs on the PC presently running FBSD > 3) Reformat the HDs > 4) Install the fresh copy of FBSD > > Will that give me a system that I can directly install Xorg-7.2 on to > or do I still have to go through the procedure shown in the "UPDATING" > file? Suppose I install Xorg-7.2 doing the actual install of FBSD; > will that make any difference? In any case, I would build a new kernel > ASAP after the new install. That should work fine, as long as you remember to run mergebase.sh on the new system. It's counterintuitive and won't have much work to do, but it will do useful things like create the /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local symlink and change some defaults in /etc so (e.g.) rc.d and periodic scripts won't run twice. If it's just your ports you're trying to refresh and don't have any worries about your base system, you could also try something like this: 0) Back up your entire system. Also make a note of what packages you have installed (pkg_info > /root/pkg-list.txt, for example). 1) Delete ALL ports from your system. I find it's most efficient to do something like this: a) make backups, esp of files in /usr/local/etc b) # pkg_info | awk -F ' ' '{print $1}' | xargs pkg_delete -f c) review remaining files under /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local, if any d) # rm -r /usr/X11R6/* /usr/local/* 2) Update your base system. csup, buildworld, etc. 3) Update your ports tree. portsnap, etc. 4) Run mergebase.sh # sh /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh 5) Reinstall everything you want installed. Have fun, JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:53:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCD816A473 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reply@mymarketing.co.il) Received: from mmmailgw02.mymarketing.co.il (mmmailgw02.mymarketing.co.il [194.90.201.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18F7E13C468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reply@mymarketing.co.il) SUBMITTER: reply@mymarketing.co.il Received: from mmmailgw02.mymarketing.co.il ([192.168.19.202]) by activetrail.com (activetrail.com) X-BBounce: 13953364|55472|questions@freebsd.org|3|0|237|1 From: "Paragon-Conventions" To: "questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:51:13 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: XVI- World IFTA Congress, 26-29 March, 2008, Porto, Portugal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:53:26 -0000 If= you can not see this email properly, please [1]cli= ck here [www=2Eparagon-convention=] [2]3D"ice207 3D"ice207 3Deof Dear Colleagues The International Family Therapy Association has announced that its = 16th World Family Therapy Congress will be held in Porto, Portugal Marc= h 26-29, 2008=2E The congress theme is Transformation and Globaliza= tion: Family Therapy in the 21st Century=2E The World Family Therapy Congress has a rich history of bringing tog= ether the greatest clinicians from around the world and we invite you t= o submit an abstract for consideration for the congress program=2E This= congress will explore how family therapy contributes to the changes be= ing experienced by families worldwide; the impact of post-modernism on = the field; and Intimacy, Desire, and Domesticity=2E In addition to the = traditional workshops and paper sessions, we encourage potential speake= rs to propose creative experiences for participants that will increase = opportunities for learning and networking=2E The deadline for abstracts= in October 31, 2007 and all abstracts must be submitted online at [3]www=2Epar= agon-conventions=2Ecom/ifta2008=2E We expect Porto to be one of our most successful congresses ever and= have made sure that the locale and venue provide ample opportunities f= or learning, sharing, and networking=2E We hope that you will consider = being a speaker in Porto and submit an abstract=2E [ifta=] =20 [4]Important dates Deadline for submission of Abstracts October 31, 2007 [ifta2=] Early registration November 30, 2007= [5]Topics 3Ddfg =20 Congress theme: Transformation and Globalizations: Family Therapy in the 2= 1st Century=2E=20 The sub-themes: The Global Family in Flux; Intimacy, Desire, and Domestic= ity; and Family Therapy in a Post-Modern World=2E ORGANIZERS Paragon Conventions 3Ddfg 18 Avenue Louis-Casai 5th floor 1= 209 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 7477930 E-mail: [6]ilev@paragon-conventio= ns=2Ecom Website: [7]www=2Eparagon-convention= s=2Ecom [8]Join Our Mailing List 3Ddfg We can update you wi= th upcoming news and changes=2E Just [9]click here we will send you news and updates [10][mailing=] = 3D= [www=2Eparagon-convention=] <= /TR> if you can't see the page click [11]www=2Eparagon-conventions=2Ecom/ifta2008/mailin= g/ifta08_01=2Ehtml _________________________________________________________________ [ico-print=2Egif"] [12]Click here to print this Page [0XEDFEB826D391CDA=] To remove yourself from= the mailing list please [13]click here = Powered by [14]ActiveTrail=2Ecom=2E<= br> References Visible links 1. 3D"http://www=2Ewe=/ 2. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X= 3. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X10E= 4. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links= 5. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links= 6. 3D"mailto:ilev@paragon-conventions=2Ecom" 7. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0XAA734EBF9A243CE42E= 8. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0X1A5FCAB144E67FC5E2412= 9. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-vi=/ 10. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Links/0XFF= 11. 3D"http://tra=/ 12. 3D"http://www=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Print/0XEDFE= 13. 3D'http://www=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Out_0XE= 14. 3D'http://www=2Eactivetrail=2Ecom/' Hidden links: 15. 3D"http://trailer=2Eweb-view=2Enet/Link= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 15:05:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0883D16A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AE713C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5CF5KmW029115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:20 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5CF5Jrl009222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:20 -0700 Message-ID: <466EB62E.8090605@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:05:18 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20070612132921.GA70847@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070612132921.GA70847@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.12.74533 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_SUBJ_9 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: well done xorg porters!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:05:21 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Having looked through various messages complaing about the latest xorg, > I'd like to say a big thankyou to all those who wrote the xorg port, > much appreciated. It was clearly a significant undertaking. > As usual, thorough quidelines, easy installation, nice merging script. > Works fine on my PIII compaq armada 2GB disk laptop under FBSD 6.2-stable. > > well done! > > The only other thing I'd like to see would be some additional build options > to choose something like the minimum config, e.g. only the minimum > required fonts. > > thanks > anton > > That can be done by individually installing fonts packages until you find the required minimum, but that's trial and error, and takes a little bit of time. I do agree though -- a minimum set of fonts for a working X11 distribution would be nice. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 15:30:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A750C16A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0FF13C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 36184 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 15:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@222.165.92.33) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 15:14:55 -0000 Message-ID: <466EBC05.3020202@extracktor.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:30:13 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> <200706120949.l5C9nrPB088807@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200706120949.l5C9nrPB088807@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:30:35 -0000 Olivier, I have no visibility on the delay on which external smtp servers deliver mails to my mail server. Once a mail is sent out of my mail client, the mail can be received immediately through my imap client. To give a more detailed picture on load, my Qmail does not really a heavy load. I'd say at 9 times out of 10 there are no mails in the queue. Everything is stored locally so I have no reason to suspect internal network delays and all. My suspicion with the delay being related to dns lookups, is partially also because I wait a couple of seconds less when I am sending from within the same service provider. Yet when I (for example go home and) send from another service provider, the delay is longer (by a couple more seconds). Do note that I am on all tests on broadband, so we can assume network delay is negligible. Can anyone confirm that Qmail/ inetd/ FreeBSD does some form of dns lookup on it's SMTP? > Do you receive email from outside world on this machine? Do you think > there is the same delay? > > How do you notice the delay? After Thunderbird mentionned that the > email was successfully sent, you immdiately try to get new email from > your inbox and it takles time? > > How big is your inbox? What mailbox format are you using? Are the disk > local or network mounted? How much loaded is your machine? How many > emails do you receive at time? Do you read with pop or imap? Are > pop/imap launched by inetd or they are daemonized? Do you have any > anti virus/spam facility? Do you implement some fancy MDA like > procmail? > > Remember that email is not instant messaging, but store and forward: > it is a slow and batch processing, it is dessign to support delay and > certainly the design should generate some. > > If the delay remains 5 seconds when your server process 1 or 10000 > messages per hour, then there is nothing to worry about. > > Authentication should effect only to sending, it deals with the > communication between Thunderbird and qmail. It has nothing to do with > reading your mailbox and should have nothing to do with the in between > delay. > > Bests, > > olivier > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 15:43:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E67A16A46E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@schnarff.com) Received: from outbound.mailhop.org (outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F7C13C46E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@schnarff.com) Received: from c-76-21-143-136.hsd1.va.comcast.net ([76.21.143.136] helo=schnarff.com) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy7HR-000D2D-Bi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:23:33 -0400 Received: (qmail 9676 invoked by uid 67); 12 Jun 2007 14:23:32 -0000 Received: from sf-nat.sourcefire.com (sf-nat.sourcefire.com [65.202.215.2]) by mail.schnarff.com (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:23:32 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 76.21.143.136 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+X0fZtAUpkrVl3gaMFnWwyIjhvDs7UGEE= Message-ID: <20070612102332.fi1au5ur4s4go844@mail.schnarff.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:23:32 -0400 From: alex@schnarff.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070612141629.6237fbd6@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070612141629.6237fbd6@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) Subject: Re: Email Sending Problem to YAHOO X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:10 -0000 >> Hi everybody!!!!! >> >> hope all doing fine ,,,, >> well i have configured my Email Server on FreeBSD 6.2 with Qmail, i >> have send email to yahoo, hotmail & gmail. On gmail & hotmail, its >> works quick, bt at yahoo ,,, its delaying nd mail recieved at yahoo >> with huge delays. wen i send email to yahoo, it gives following >> defferal error, >> >> @40000000466e85af2e894abc delivery 12: deferral: >> Connected_to_216.39.53.1_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( >> 58.65.151.33 >> )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- >> 06.html/ >> @40000000466e85af2e8bb3ec status: local 0/10 remote 1/255 >> @40000000466e85b000c37904 delivery 13: deferral: >> Connected_to_66.196.97.250_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_Message_from_( >> 58.65.151.33 >> )_temporarily_deferred_-_4.16.50._Please_refer_to_http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer- >> 06.html/ >> @40000000466e85b000c57ca4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 >> >> Kindly Help me out in fixing such probelm ,,,,, > > The error message mentions a url. Perhaps you can find more information > there. > Perhaps this is interesting to you: > http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/original/abuse/abuse-60.html > > Jona I've experienced this same problem. Unfortunately, Yahoo is by default deferring all mail from any servers it has not whitelisted, and in a lot of cases, doing so until the mail eventaully bounces. While this policy is annoying, it's risen to the level of excruciatingly irritating after dealing with their tech support on the issue -- it's essentially nonexistent, and you have to really pester the crap out of them *and* fill out ridiculously long questionnaires on your server to get a human to reply long enough to fix the situation. I'm nearly at the point of fixing things with them, but it's taken me weeks. Good luck with your system; I would start by visiting the URL and following the suggestions there. Alex Kirk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 15:49:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE31816A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B817813C45E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CFilnR007147; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CFikdb007146; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:46 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Graham Potts Message-ID: <20070612154446.GA7106@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002201c7acec$870a3180$1902a8c0@agnet.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:49:49 -0000 Hi, > I seem to be having trouble with spam from your email servers - I have been > receiving emails from your mailing list for some time now. The problem is > that I do not want them, nor have I ever asked for them. Despite sending 4 > requests to the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails, I am STILL > receiving them! It may be that your are receiving the posts at a different address than they are originally sent to from the list. This would happen if some Email address is forwarded to you and that forwarded address is subscribed. This could be done by accident - you or someone else forgetting the forward or alias - or it could be done by someone intentionally - they make a subscription and respond to the confirmation at some address and then set up an alias or a forward to go to you. Some even go as far as creating an 'alias include' list to resend posts to a group of other people, either that they think will find the posts useful or to annoy a group of people. So, that is probably what needs to be sorted out and tracked down. Check your message headers carefully. Although that is not definitive, it might give you a clue as to the path the posts are taking to get to you. Then, that information can be used to find the subscription to be removed or alias to be broken. > > Please remove my address from this mailing list immediately. That can only be done if the list manager can figure out which actual Email address of the thousands subscribed is the one that is causing the posts to be sent to you. So, you will probably need to help track it down. ////jerry > > Thank you > > Graham > > Graham Potts > > I.T. Development & Support Consultant > > Warning: May Contain Nuts > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:02:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2546F16A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C2313C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so3415169pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:02:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=js1fBVQCirnj9Hx7tmPaS+EMXLuZjHD2ERksx34FbEdrlAaESVztUkMTE2bP1ru9hiOEdn9TDRDI8RSZskX9M3+4OlDsLXitiRYNw3a3Jgu0LbWlVnHucRsUWAPeJr6l2sUTynjkIGGmYsqEY/EXfwoTK3u7M41Z5CRKIXOPQZc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=i/PYh05TdkNtlq3mGS3Cubgg8Co4cM0lfsLSErSJx3Wp+XEvEaY39kzWfi3fAch35byaqA8I+QYn0ZRdgQR3pAhtTHW/78NnsDY/Sy2pUhocNk7ACAu0NVbGhtKgcCHqNADMn2f7cOcOnjBhlTNUbNftjYYPA+/5QbdEiPg+lvw= Received: by 10.35.52.18 with SMTP id e18mr11444774pyk.1181664158253; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:02:43 -0000 Hi, I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly, and the system boots without a hitch. After installing the ports tree, I went and did "make install clean" in the dir for cvsup-without-gui. The script appeared to be working through the requirements just fine too. It downloaded all necessary files and was proceeding to the build phase. I'm not sure in which package this occurred but the build just died on me. No errors, just a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted and tried the install again with the same result. I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. I've never seen a FreeBSD, OpenBSD or Linux (for that matter) hard hang on program compilation apart from hardware problems. Also of particular interest with this machine, is that during startup it takes (no exaggeration) about 2 minutes for sshd to start (at least, "starting sshd" is the last line on stdout printed during startup at this point). I've never seen a system take that long start sshd, even slower machines than this one. On the initial startup, I chalked it up to the generation of key pairs, but it happened on the second startup too. System configuration is as follows: AMD K6 700mHz 256mb RAM (PC 133) 13gb HDD I have 384mb of PC 100 memory laying around that I was going to try and test my theory on, but wanted to consult some of the more experienced on this forum before going "hog" wild on this. Just out of curiosity, what are the impacts of using memory chips of unlike speeds in the system at the same time? I've heard, in times past, that if one does mix memory chips, the slower chips should be used in the lower priority (i.e. higher numbered) slots. Is this true, or is this bogus? I'm running FreeBSD 6.2 at work on two "lost-leader", no name "cheap-o" laptops also with 256mb of memory with no problems (granted, they are Celeron 1.7gHz but still). I'm even running X with XFCE or KDE on them. I'm really suspecting faulty memory. Oh, by the way, this is to be a web server therefore, I'm not going to be running any GUIs by default. Text based administration only. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:14:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1283316A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A1E13C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CGEFme048651; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AD205B842; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:14 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Andrew Falanga Message-ID: <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Falanga , freebsd-questions References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:17 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was > trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having > some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly, > and the system boots without a hitch. You don't need cvsup-without-gui anymore. A rewrite in C called csup is part of the base system in 6.2. This should be fixed in the handbook, as it still references cvsup. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGbsZWEnfvsMMhpyURApwBAJ46FwRCBovUaeMH5wqkIjauzG8ThQCfT4wZ 90sL0mtt5L6rl9bwvzWKvmo= =Erhe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:25:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624AC16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200E013C46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so3429485pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pLAlP1u/MsuSX8OmTGIwy4GZwLFeeeDlk1hiJOAFHOM+TcbE58E+DLZNzlOx/JKHyiq6wTH40ib1QUTd0epSkeVTyoS6JttngYGV8UbD4i+AApZiOZVYPBlIobKVnPpJsaWjAr6mxML7AhvR2wz7K9vHrGc2E4z5YerV0ZfUQwA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gvFX3O7thDfZ3/gFs38CMEzQOAyK6KBEXL/ydtgUuX9cImoBthOd5wibW20zjb1Hg67EUZhcdVcuQ3Wy+EP2BCuBo2AiegXIS52L8l+blq3A+wvlLDdTADsoufNYEmKHlcBgx6pYV1bVqlR7KijXXoVTG2AdgVZWdOMoQmY3Jhc= Received: by 10.35.70.2 with SMTP id x2mr11431691pyk.1181665538090; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:25:38 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Andrew Falanga" , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Cc: Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:25:39 -0000 On 6/12/07, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was > > trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having > > some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly, > > and the system boots without a hitch. > > You don't need cvsup-without-gui anymore. A rewrite in C called csup is > part of the base system in 6.2. > > This should be fixed in the handbook, as it still references cvsup. > > Roland Thank you for this. I was not aware. However, would it still not behoove me to find out what is going on, if there really is a problem? I'm looking to install WebGUI on this system which requires MySQL and ImageMagick (both of which are in the ports). Wouldn't a compilation of other program produce similar results? Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:32:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE7D16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp108.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com (smtp108.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.102.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7011513C4B9 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 51002 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 16:05:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xGRhGUwW81JWyMTkqvNQqJuC26Rr2Ahj745N6Pkb4D+bYv9erVF36R1U7r9p0KV5sPmLV5pDQY2Nhxc2kVF9tV8LtoTQGz/WyHdlQu0sU3nzdBZqX+wmgBc0ytTEJwh/FE2aPqIrqajCjtCvpTvhZBu8xF+ZwFPm4wg1Xo87Xvc= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.82.89 with plain) by smtp108.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 16:05:45 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: q.NmSUMVM1klOOO4F.rHJjgL8EliYddw1kQ6jZfLDIl7ea8O From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:05:14 +0200 Message-Id: <1181664323.4796.9.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: failing portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:32:27 -0000 Hello list, I am using following system (appending output of uname -a): FreeBSD vagabund.w33 6.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr 26 17:40:53 UTC 2007 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I installed portupgrade and portaudit from 6.2-RELEASE-CD. Updated my ports via csup like the handbook described. After a run of portaudit -a I had to upgrade some ports. E. g. to upgrade gtar, and that happened (appending a log of script): Script started on Tue Jun 12 17:50:12 2007 vagabund# portupgrade -P gtar-1.15.1_2 cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 17271 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000. ........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000....... ..11000.........12000.........13000.........14000.........15000......... 16000.........17000.. ..... done] missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb! /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:567:in `open_db': database file error (PortsDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:736:in `port' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:924:in `all_depends_list' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in `sort_build!' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:694:in `main' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:755:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:210:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:210:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1981 vagabund# exit exit Script done on Tue Jun 12 17:51:15 2007 I would say that this is not normal... :-( I read also /usr/ports/UPDATING but this problem appears nowhere in the document... Could somebody give me a hint, please? ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:35:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98ED16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188B913C483 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CGZScr021797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:35:29 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466ECB50.5050603@webanoide.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:35:28 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:35:31 -0000 Andrew Falanga wrote: > Hi, [ trim ] > After installing the ports tree, I went and did "make install clean" > in the dir for cvsup-without-gui. The script appeared to be working > through the requirements just fine too. It downloaded all necessary > files and was proceeding to the build phase. I'm not sure in which > package this occurred but the build just died on me. No errors, just > a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a > different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted > and tried the install again with the same result. Hardware problems. > I have 384mb of PC 100 memory laying around that I was going to try > and test my theory on, but wanted to consult some of the more > experienced on this forum before going "hog" wild on this. Just out > of curiosity, what are the impacts of using memory chips of unlike > speeds in the system at the same time? I've heard, in times past, > that if one does mix memory chips, the slower chips should be used in > the lower priority (i.e. higher numbered) slots. Is this true, or is > this bogus? Faster chips match the speed of the slower ones. You could add that extra chip and see what happens. > I'm running FreeBSD 6.2 at work on two "lost-leader", no name > "cheap-o" laptops also with 256mb of memory with no problems (granted, > they are Celeron 1.7gHz but still). I'm even running X with XFCE or > KDE on them. I'm really suspecting faulty memory. Oh, by the way, > this is to be a web server therefore, I'm not going to be running any > GUIs by default. Text based administration only. I'd suggest testing/stressing your memory: http://www.memtest86.com or /usr/ports/sysutils/memtest86 Let us know how it goes. Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:47:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F63F16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83A913C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1593710wxd for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.113.20 with SMTP id l20mr6755113agc.1181666847218; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13sm6053134wrl.2007.06.12.09.47.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:47:59 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070612124004.E3CC.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re[2]: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:47:28 -0000 On June 12, 2007 at 10:47AM John Nielsen wrote: > That should work fine, as long as you remember to run mergebase.sh on the new > system. It's counterintuitive and won't have much work to do, but it will do > useful things like create the /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local symlink and change > some defaults in /etc so (e.g.) rc.d and periodic scripts won't run twice. > > If it's just your ports you're trying to refresh and don't have any worries > about your base system, you could also try something like this: > > 0) Back up your entire system. Also make a note of what packages you have > installed (pkg_info > /root/pkg-list.txt, for example). > > 1) Delete ALL ports from your system. I find it's most efficient to do > something like this: > a) make backups, esp of files in /usr/local/etc > b) # pkg_info | awk -F ' ' '{print $1}' | xargs pkg_delete -f > c) review remaining files under /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local, if any > d) # rm -r /usr/X11R6/* /usr/local/* > > 2) Update your base system. csup, buildworld, etc. > > 3) Update your ports tree. portsnap, etc. > > 4) Run mergebase.sh > # > > 5) Reinstall everything you want installed. > > Have fun, Having way too much fun. The system crashed again, causing me to get really annoyed. I decided I had, had enough and totally erased the HD's after coping any config files I would need to another PC first. I am in the process of reformatting the two 72G HDs now. Now, just so I get this straight. 1) I do a minimal install of FBSD. 2) Update the ports, in my case using portsnap. 3) Update the system files 4) Do a BuildWorld with custom kernel installation 5) Run: sh /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh 6) Start the installation of Xorg-7.2 and other program. I am assuming that I should have the VAR as stated in the "UPDATING" file set prior to to actually attempting to update the system. After it is completed I can remove it. Is that correct? Well, the next few days should be fun! -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:18:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D530416A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1ED13C484 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5CHIpLR090203; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:18:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:18:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070612124004.E3CC.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20070612124004.E3CC.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121318.18872.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:18:54 -0000 On Tuesday 12 June 2007 12:47:59 pm Gerard wrote: > On June 12, 2007 at 10:47AM John Nielsen wrote: > > That should work fine, as long as you remember to run mergebase.sh on the > > new system. It's counterintuitive and won't have much work to do, but it > > will do useful things like create the /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local symlink > > and change some defaults in /etc so (e.g.) rc.d and periodic scripts > > won't run twice. > > > > If it's just your ports you're trying to refresh and don't have any > > worries about your base system, you could also try something like this: > > > > 0) Back up your entire system. Also make a note of what packages you have > > installed (pkg_info > /root/pkg-list.txt, for example). > > > > 1) Delete ALL ports from your system. I find it's most efficient to do > > something like this: > > a) make backups, esp of files in /usr/local/etc > > b) # pkg_info | awk -F ' ' '{print $1}' | xargs pkg_delete -f > > c) review remaining files under /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local, if any > > d) # rm -r /usr/X11R6/* /usr/local/* > > > > 2) Update your base system. csup, buildworld, etc. > > > > 3) Update your ports tree. portsnap, etc. > > > > 4) Run mergebase.sh > > # > > > > 5) Reinstall everything you want installed. > > > > Have fun, > > Having way too much fun. The system crashed again, causing me to get > really annoyed. I decided I had, had enough and totally erased the > HD's after coping any config files I would need to another PC first. I > am in the process of reformatting the two 72G HDs now. > > Now, just so I get this straight. > > 1) I do a minimal install of FBSD. > 2) Update the ports, in my case using portsnap. > 3) Update the system files > 4) Do a BuildWorld with custom kernel installation > 5) Run: sh /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh > 6) Start the installation of Xorg-7.2 and other program. > > I am assuming that I should have the VAR as stated in the "UPDATING" > file set prior to to actually attempting to update the system. After > it is completed I can remove it. Is that correct? Looks good, except I don't know what you mean by VAR. If you're talking about the XORG_UPGRADE environment variable you shouldn't need it as long as you run mergebase before trying to install xorg. > Well, the next few days should be fun! Indeed. I have an older laptop that's chugging through the upgrade now.. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:20:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509E816A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E87713C4C5 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BF11A3C19; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889E5513C5; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78E75BE7C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:20:51 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrew Falanga Message-ID: <20070612172051.GA15851@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:20:52 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was > trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having > some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly, > and the system boots without a hitch. > > After installing the ports tree, I went and did "make install clean" > in the dir for cvsup-without-gui. The script appeared to be working > through the requirements just fine too. It downloaded all necessary > files and was proceeding to the build phase. I'm not sure in which > package this occurred but the build just died on me. No errors, just > a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a > different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted > and tried the install again with the same result. > > I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. Could be, or CPU cooling, or something else. K6 CPUs are notoriously heat-sensitive. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:22:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B41016A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us [204.184.27.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2113C13C48C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from [10.0.0.200] (unknown [204.184.27.217]) by mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9472688FF; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:22:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <466ED64B.4070107@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:22:19 -0500 From: Scott Mayo Organization: Bloomfield Schools User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@safeport.com References: <466D925A.3000009@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> <20070612120229.F86945@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20070612120229.F86945@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Backspace problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:22:20 -0000 doug wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Scott Mayo wrote: > >> I am not on any VI list, but thought I would post this here to see if >> anyone had any ideas. >> >> This is my first FreeBSD server, so I am still learning. >> >> I got my backspace and delete working the shell after a few >> adjustments, but they still act odd in VI. I have checked setting >> with my linux boxes (the backspace and delete work fine there) and >> everything looks the same. I did an stty -a | grep erase and it tells >> me that erase is Contral-? and erase2 is control-H. I have changed >> both around to make them either Ctrl-? or Ctrl-H, but that has not >> helped. >> >> If I hit backspace it just backs up on the line until were input-mode >> was started during this input-mode session. If I hit delete then it >> capitalizes the charcter behind the cursor and throws me into >> command-mode. >> >> I am not sure if there are anymore settings to change in FreeBSD or if >> it is a setting in VI. >> >> Any help would greatly be appreciated. >> > Scott, my stty -a: > > cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; > eol2 = ; erase = ^H; erase2 = ^@; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; > lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; > status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; > > IMO redefining keys is not a good thing if you are learning UNIX and vi. > In the default setup (I use tcsh for an interactive shell) ctrl-h is a > backspace and functions on the command line like the backspace key, > i.e., deletes the char to the left of the cursor. In vi the delete-key > == x in command mode (by default). The [del] key does not work on the > command line. > > I would advise getting comfortable with the default settings before > branching out. Key bindings and /etc/termcap changes have lots of > ramifications. vi is as it is because it was written when systems were > line oriented. The 'hjkl' are where your fingers sit if you are a touch > typist, and hence were chosen for that purpose. As late as 1995 vi on > BSDI (where I start on the BSD trail) did not support the cursor keys > very well. > > I have attached a vi cheat sheet that I found years ago. This is a > pretty good starter set of commands for vi. > > vi is not even as bad as it gets. vi is in /usr/bin so if your system is > really broken and you must edit something ed is the tool available in > FreeBSD. > Thanks for the info Doug. A friend of mine set me on the right path. I have been using vi in linux, except it was not vi. Vi was aliased to vim. I had installed vim on my FreeBSD server the other day, but that did not fix it. I found out that it has to be run with 'set nocp' so that it does not run in vi compatibility mode. I did this and now my backspace and delete work like I want them to. :) I appreciate the replies. -- Scott Mayo System Administrator Bloomfield Schools PH: 573-568-5669 FA: 573-568-4565 Pager: 800-264-2535 X2549 Duct tape is like the force, it has a light side and a dark side and it holds the universe together. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:24:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677BC16A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbishop@twosensemedia.com) Received: from twosensemedia.com (twosensemedia.com [69.15.36.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B5413C45D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbishop@twosensemedia.com) Received: from [10.0.1.8] (account wbishop HELO S0030153310) by twosensemedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 3203158 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:33:17 -0400 Message-ID: <004701c7ad07$0e9f5d90$0801000a@S0030153310> From: "Worth Bishop" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:33:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:45 -0000 Please help if you can... BACKGROUND This crash is occurring on a dual-AMD 1.6Ghz cpu white-box system with 1 Gb ram, 250Gb storage running GENERIC kernel. The system has been in production use as a web server for nearly five years. About 3 - 4 months ago, the system was upgraded from an earlier FreeBSD version to 6.1. At the same time, all supporting applications (Apache webserver, PERL, PostgreSQL, PHP, countless other applications & libraries) were upgraded to the current releases. The system was stable up until a couple of weeks ago. FIRST ERROR EVENT The system crashed during normal usage. The following message was displayed on the console which was not responsive to keyboard input: Sleeping thread (tid 100122, pid 11099) owns a non-sleepable lock panic: sleeping thread cpuid=1 The system was restarted, an fsck routine was completed (answering "yes" to all the "Do you want to salvage" type questions) and the server ran fine. For about a week. It then crashed again several times, at intervals varying from a few minutes of uptime to a few days. SECOND ERROR EVENT After some crashes, a message similar to that above was displayed. However, at other times a message similar to this was displayed: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid=0; apic id=01 fault virtual address =0x100 fault code =supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =0x20:0xc066c731 stack pointer =0x28:0xe432ebf0 framepointer =0x28:0xe432ebfc code segment =base 0x0, limit0xfffff, type 0x1b =DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran1 processor eflags =resume, IOPL=0 current process =36 (syncer) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid=0 uptime: 3d10h11m44s Dumping 1535 Mb (2 chunks) [NOTE: the system had 1.5Gb memory at that time. Memory was removed, reseated, swapped, etc., now 1Gb] chunk 0:1Mb (159 pages) CORRECTIONS ATTEMPTED Somewhere during this ordeal, a Google search revealed a number of other people experiencing the "Sleeping thread" problem. One of these was apparently experienced in a FreeBSD 6.x development version stress test. No definitive solution was identified in anything we say, except a single reference to the problem being a kernel bug fixed in FreeBSD 6.2. Accordingly, we upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2 but have still experienced the problem. We reviewed the 'messages' file and found references to several things which led us to check FreeBSD 6.2 ERRATA (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html). This suggested adding 'kern.ipc.nmbclusters="0"' to the /boot/loader.conf file which might avoid a known issue. We tried this, but saw no relief. We also found a reference in the manual that suggested the issue might be a problem with the APIC in 6.x. This recommended adding 'hint.apic.0.disabled="1"' to loader.conf. Tried this; no help. In order to try to get more information about the system dumps we added: dumpdev="AUTO" and dumpdir="/usr/crash" [to get more storage space than available in /var/] and have generated several vmcore.# files of ~1 Gb each (all identical size). We attempted to use DDB to analyze the dumps (struggling now, unfamiliar with kernel debugging process) with no success. Research suggested we needed to create a debug version of the kernel (i.e., KERNEL.DEBUG) with debugging options enabled. We duly copied GENERIC and edited it, noting that "options ddb" was already enabled. We added 'makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols' as suggested and tried to "make buildkernel" which errored out stating that KDB must be enabled to use DDB. We edited KERNEL.DEBUG to add 'options KDB # Enable kernel debugger' and attempted to "make buildkernel" again. This time, the process stopped again with the message: THIRD ERROR EVENT [snip] inline-unit-growth=100 --param arge-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c: In function `SHA512_Transform': /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c:753: warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized in this function *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL.DEBUG. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. www:/usr/src# With this, we are stumped. HELP PLEASE! Can anyone: - lead us to a solution based on these error messages? - help us understand why the GENERIC kernel with only the debugging options added failed to make? - help us understand what '/usr/src/crypto/sha2/sha2.c' has to do with anything? - help us understand what we need to do to extract useful information from the vmcore.# files? - offer any other suggestions? Thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:24:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0C916A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbishop@twosensemedia.com) Received: from twosensemedia.com (twosensemedia.com [69.15.36.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EB713C45A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbishop@twosensemedia.com) Received: from [10.0.1.8] (account wbishop HELO S0030153310) by twosensemedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 3203549 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:37:52 -0400 Message-ID: <004b01c7ad07$b3d474d0$0801000a@S0030153310> From: "Worth Bishop" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:38:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Fw: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:24:46 -0000 Addendum: For what it's worth, the 250Gb Samsung drive was added when the system was upgraded - it's only 3-4 months old. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Worth Bishop" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:33 AM Subject: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized > Please help if you can... > > BACKGROUND > > This crash is occurring on a dual-AMD 1.6Ghz cpu white-box system with 1 > Gb ram, 250Gb storage running GENERIC kernel. The system has been in > production use as a web server for nearly five years. > > About 3 - 4 months ago, the system was upgraded from an earlier FreeBSD > version to 6.1. At the same time, all supporting applications (Apache > webserver, PERL, PostgreSQL, PHP, countless other applications & > libraries) were upgraded to the current releases. The system was stable up > until a couple of weeks ago. > > FIRST ERROR EVENT > > The system crashed during normal usage. The following message was > displayed on the console which was not responsive to keyboard input: > > Sleeping thread (tid 100122, pid 11099) > owns a non-sleepable lock > > panic: sleeping thread > cpuid=1 > > The system was restarted, an fsck routine was completed (answering "yes" > to all the "Do you want to salvage" type questions) and the server ran > fine. For about a week. It then crashed again several times, at intervals > varying from a few minutes of uptime to a few days. > > SECOND ERROR EVENT > > After some crashes, a message similar to that above was displayed. > However, at other times a message similar to this was displayed: > > kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid=0; apic id=01 > fault virtual address =0x100 > fault code =supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer =0x20:0xc066c731 > stack pointer =0x28:0xe432ebf0 > framepointer =0x28:0xe432ebfc > code segment =base 0x0, limit0xfffff, type 0x1b > > =DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran1 > processor eflags =resume, IOPL=0 > current process =36 (syncer) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid=0 > uptime: 3d10h11m44s > Dumping 1535 Mb (2 chunks) [NOTE: the system had 1.5Gb memory at that > time. Memory was removed, reseated, swapped, etc., now 1Gb] > chunk 0:1Mb (159 pages) > > CORRECTIONS ATTEMPTED > > Somewhere during this ordeal, a Google search revealed a number of other > people experiencing the "Sleeping thread" problem. One of these was > apparently experienced in a FreeBSD 6.x development version stress test. > No definitive solution was identified in anything we say, except a single > reference to the problem being a kernel bug fixed in FreeBSD 6.2. > > Accordingly, we upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2 but have still experienced the > problem. > > We reviewed the 'messages' file and found references to several things > which led us to check FreeBSD 6.2 ERRATA > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/errata.html). This suggested adding > 'kern.ipc.nmbclusters="0"' to the /boot/loader.conf file which might avoid > a known issue. We tried this, but saw no relief. > > We also found a reference in the manual that suggested the issue might be > a problem with the APIC in 6.x. This recommended adding > 'hint.apic.0.disabled="1"' to loader.conf. Tried this; no help. > > In order to try to get more information about the system dumps we added: > dumpdev="AUTO" and dumpdir="/usr/crash" [to get more storage space than > available in /var/] and have generated several vmcore.# files of ~1 Gb > each (all identical size). > > We attempted to use DDB to analyze the dumps (struggling now, unfamiliar > with kernel debugging process) with no success. Research suggested we > needed to create a debug version of the kernel (i.e., KERNEL.DEBUG) with > debugging options enabled. > > We duly copied GENERIC and edited it, noting that "options ddb" was > already enabled. We added 'makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build > kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols' as suggested and tried to "make > buildkernel" which errored out stating that KDB must be enabled to use > DDB. We edited KERNEL.DEBUG to add 'options KDB > # Enable kernel debugger' and attempted to "make buildkernel" again. This > time, the process stopped again with the message: > > THIRD ERROR EVENT > > [snip] > inline-unit-growth=100 --param > rge-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror > /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c > /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c: In function `SHA512_Transform': > /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c:753: warning: 'T2' might be used > uninitialized in this function > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL.DEBUG. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > www:/usr/src# > > With this, we are stumped. > > HELP PLEASE! > > Can anyone: > > - lead us to a solution based on these error messages? > - help us understand why the GENERIC kernel with only the debugging > options added failed to make? > - help us understand what '/usr/src/crypto/sha2/sha2.c' has to do with > anything? > - help us understand what we need to do to extract useful information > from the vmcore.# files? > - offer any other suggestions? > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:34:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA5416A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B0B13C4EE for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-321860.home.otenet.gr [85.72.112.226]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l5CHYRxt028557 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:28 +0300 Message-ID: <466ED923.5040607@otenet.gr> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:27 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612172051.GA15851@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070612172051.GA15851@rot13.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:34:31 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:02:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just installed a fresh 6.2-RELEASE i386 system last night and was >> trying to get cvsup-without-gui installed from ports and was having >> some interesting problems. The install of FreeBSD went flawlessly, >> and the system boots without a hitch. >> >> After installing the ports tree, I went and did "make install clean" >> in the dir for cvsup-without-gui. The script appeared to be working >> through the requirements just fine too. It downloaded all necessary >> files and was proceeding to the build phase. I'm not sure in which >> package this occurred but the build just died on me. No errors, just >> a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a >> different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted >> and tried the install again with the same result. >> >> I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. >> > > Could be, or CPU cooling, or something else. K6 CPUs are notoriously > heat-sensitive. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I have a K6 CPU that refuses to compile a (Linux) kernel. It does pretty much everything else (no other high loads) Installing cvsup-without-gui from ports is intensive, if memory serves well, cvsup is written in modula2, you are effectively building the modula2 compiler in order to build cvsup. Either add from packages or simply use csup. And run the memtest86 on your system as suggested until it completes at least one - two passes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:44:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0281316A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordanja@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtai106.cox.net (eastrmmtai106.cox.net [68.230.240.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E3013C48A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordanja@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070612170107.SUFC8257.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:01:07 -0400 Received: from residencepc ([72.207.216.108]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Ah151X00S2LuPNo0000000; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:01:06 -0400 From: "Jack Jordan" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:01:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Free Bsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:44:57 -0000 I purchased a copy of this software. what is the installation command line for opening disk#1,2,&Ubunto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:45:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF43316A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DE213C45B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so228679uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uKu1U4cxWt+5MT0qa9JS5/pigy+AvSqnk5UZcqhNidXOJA/JgQujZF7ov+2IaAcEjOIgC0b1aVevbVsnOVMarN3TzGYNX8AEr5zmXdTWqy3An95n1GW1ZyG6DW3jXoIN3WBJpHs07LcBw87llH+gZQoVQ5FzNVznO0VNe044wjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=JBSdo8sGKC1nqGhq7m71Tnx+mFccLiNyh6eWmmgs9ZLUcn0AwK93D4SaXK0Kc09VoHIDjJ7pEN6octNcQFdezt+G6rv0qbbhcXFrO2Sc/AvxcoC0HoG3rk3LzpaQ9BekuPtdsEzdc6w03bJrazFiznjCbGz3EzkRKJg6UyXb4zg= Received: by 10.67.19.17 with SMTP id w17mr670103ugi.1181670353228; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.101.15 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0706121045q2b62c490y87764af69c789e07@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:45:53 -0700 From: "Kevin Downey" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: qemu, bridging, wifi, ip tunnels, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:45:54 -0000 I have a qemu vm with w2k as the guest os. The vm is running on my desktop on which I am tracking -CURRENT. My desktop's network connection is wifi via an atheros card. I would like the w2k vm to be on the same network as the desktop, and get it's ip via dhcp, etc. I seems like wifi is not very friendly to casual bridging, so just ifconfig bridge0 addm tap0 addm ath0 up seems to be out. I was thinking of an ip tunnel (gif) from the desktop to a machine that is using wired ethernet. Then bridge the gif interface on the desktop with the tap interface from qemu and finally bridging the gif interface on the wired machine with its nic (vr) uh, it seems sort of complicated. Anyone have any simpler suggestions, or suggestions more likely to work? -- i'll unhook my oily pink mini-kimono, you kill him in honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:49:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72CA16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from bossdog.realss.com (bossdog.realss.com [211.157.108.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DF413C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangweiwu@realss.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE4E1C0008 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:49:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from bossdog.realss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bossdog.realss.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09170-20 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:49:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from eula (142.52.72.124.board.xm.fj.dynamic.163data.com.cn [124.72.52.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bossdog.realss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A41C0004 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:49:15 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:47:53 +0800 From: Zhang Weiwu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613014753.5b031ccf@eula> Organization: Real Softservice X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bossdog.realss.com Subject: iftop doesn't work with tun0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:49:15 -0000 As of 0.17, iftop change log says it being to support ppp interface, while in my case it doesn't work for my tun0 which is created by /etc/rc.d/ppp (DSL connection). Launch 'iftop -i tun0' does correctly show up all active TCP connections and from/to address, but bandwidth usage for every connection are always '0b'. Any one hit this problem too or give me a hint? I googled but earliest post about tun0 and iftop is on 2004, before release 0f v0.17 of iftop. Again I am not sure if I should mail iftop developers, as maybe they didn't design specifically for FreeBSD. Or, at least, perhaps someone already successfully run iftop on ppp link and can tell me if this behavior I saw is normal or not. Thanks a lot in advance! Below is example output of monitoring tun0. When working on fxp0 it's 100% correct. 12.5Kb 25.0Kb 37.5Kb 50.0Kb 62.5Kb =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=B4=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=B4= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=B4=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=B4=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 242.6.198.160 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b =20 <=3D 0b 0b 0b =20 242.6.45.125 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b =20 <=3D 0b 0b 0b =20 242.6.241.248 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b =20 <=3D 0b 0b 0b =20 51.6.214.188 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b =20 <=3D 0b 0b 0b =20 51.6.214.186 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b <=3D 0b 0b 0b 51.6.214.252 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b <=3D 0b 0b 0b 51.6.214.96 =3D> 209.85.139.18 0b 0b 0b <=3D 0b 0b 0b =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 TX: cumm: 0B rates:k: 0b0b 0b 0b =20 RX: 0B 0b0b 0b 0b =20 TOTAL: 0B 0b0b 0b 0b =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:17:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46D516A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D23D13C45D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CICHK7007575; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:12:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CICHku007574; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:12:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:12:17 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Jack Jordan Message-ID: <20070612181217.GA7541@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free Bsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:17:19 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 12:01:07PM -0500, Jack Jordan wrote: > > I purchased a copy of this software. what is the installation command line > for opening disk#1,2,&Ubunto ?????? What does Ubunto have to do with it? Do you also have Ubunto installed on the disk - eg this is installed as a dual-boot? In that case, if things are installed correctly, it should come up with a menu item for it and FreeBSD at boot time. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:28:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E0916A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9539113C469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CI5Yi4042299; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l5CI5YNW042296; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: Jack Jordan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070612140100.B86945@fledge.watson.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:05:35 +0100 (BST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free Bsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:28:43 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jack Jordan wrote: > > I purchased a copy of this software. what is the installation command line > for opening disk#1,2,&Ubunto > Ubunto is a Linux packaged distribution. If you want the FreeBSD equivalent of that check out http://www.pcbsd.org/. If you purchased FreeBSD 6.x first start with http://www.freebsd.org/projects/newbies.html. The short answer to your question is probably ctrl-alt-delete. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:35:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7A916A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (mail.neti.ee [194.126.101.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7613C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (relay8.neti.ee [88.196.174.139]) by HOT-Bounce1.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7695CF34E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:08:46 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.3 (20060930) (Debian) at neti.ee Received: from Relayhost1.neti.ee (Relayhost1 [88.196.174.141]) by MXR-8.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB82412045A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:08:42 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [88.196.109.236] (88-196-109-236-dsl.trt.estpak.ee [88.196.109.236]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0165F26965E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:08:42 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <466EE129.4030908@raad.tartu.ee> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:08:41 +0300 From: Toomas Aas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070304) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: gettext version bump and php5-gettext X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:35:45 -0000 Hello! I'm about to upgrade PHP4->PHP5 on a server where gettext-0.14.5 port is currently installed. This server also has php gettext extension installed from ports (php4-gettext-4.4.4). When I read UPDATING entry of 20070318, I initially thought that I'll need to rebuild all ports that depend on gettext. However, after reading /usr/ports/lang/php5/Makefile.ext it seems to me that php5-gettext would actually build with my existing version of gettext, since Makefile.ext seems to accept any existing version of libintl. If that were the case, it would make my PHP upgrade much easier since I wouldn't need to upgrade gettext, SpamAssassin, amavisd-new and Amanda at the same time. I appreciate that I won't have the latest and greatest version of gettext, but I could get the PHP upgrade done with less reading of various ChangeLogs, less downtime, less work... Is my understanding correct? -- Toomas Aas -- ... Press any key to continue or any other key to quit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:44:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C711B16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC8113C4AE for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:44:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1621765wxd for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.9.8 with SMTP id 8mr3406033wxi.1181673857553; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h12sm6524525wxd.2007.06.12.11.44.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:49 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200706121318.18872.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <20070612124004.E3CC.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> <200706121318.18872.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070612144120.A963.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re[2]: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:44:18 -0000 On June 12, 2007 at 01:18PM John Nielsen wrote: > Looks good, except I don't know what you mean by VAR. If you're talking about > the XORG_UPGRADE environment variable you shouldn't need it as long as you > run mergebase before trying to install xorg. Yes, that is what I was referring to. > > Well, the next few days should be fun! > > Indeed. I have an older laptop that's chugging through the upgrade now.. Been there, done that -- it sucks. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:34:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B8016A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E740413C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from [87.114.72.44] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HyC7w-00028A-R8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:05 +0100 Message-ID: <466EF52D.2080800@jessikat.plus.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:34:05 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: iwi won't switch on at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:34:07 -0000 I have an acer laptop with an intel 2200 wifi; when I had PCBSD 1.3 installed I could boot from cold and have the wireless start up properly (it's using wpa with a hidden ssid ap). After I installed freebsd 6.2 I cannot get the wireless to come up on first boot. I seem to have to switch the wireless on and then reboot. I think under PCBSD is used to have to do something like sysctl dev.iwi.0.radio=1 in one of the startup scripts to make this work. Now however when I execute that I see a message saying that oid is read only. Is there some way to get this wifi starting properly again? -- Robin Becker various bits of information $ uname -a FreeBSD xxx.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 $ kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 15 0xc0400000 70794c kernel 2 1 0xc0b08000 1adb8 linux.ko 3 1 0xc0b23000 e1a8 if_iwi.ko 4 2 0xc0b32000 2d60 firmware.ko 5 1 0xc0b35000 2cf4 wlan_acl.ko 6 1 0xc0b38000 59f20 acpi.ko 7 1 0xc4f27000 4000 logo_saver.ko $ pkg_info | grep iwi iwi-firmware-2.4_7 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Driver Firmware iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Firmware Kernel Module $ cat /boot/loader.conf if_iwi_load="YES" firmware_load="YES" wlan_load="YES" wlan_acl_load="YES" wlan_wep_load="YES" wlan_ccmp_load="YES" wlan_tkip_load="YES" messages ====== initial boot Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: mem 0xb010 1000-0xb0101fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6 Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:a1:2e:8e Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: radio turned off ====== after switch pressed Jun 10 08:55:17 xxx kernel: iwi0: radio turned on ====== after reboot Jun 10 09:14:44 xxx kernel: iwi0: mem 0xb010 1000-0xb0101fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6 Jun 10 09:14:44 xxx kernel: iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:a1:2e:8e From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:42:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF116A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE65813C4D5 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.38.107]) by hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:29 +0200 Received: from KGISH ([84.83.61.253]) by hpsmtp-eml07.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:28 +0200 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:19 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: AcetKcl7P20lhYj0TX+JWWXtZEuBQQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2007 19:42:28.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF681E00:01C7AD29] Subject: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:31 -0000 The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the following error message: --> Failed to load module "nv" Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier downloaded the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had installed it into the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. Do I need to reinstall it but this time in the new environment? Is that then under /usr/X11R6? How do I tell the make script to point it there, export X11BASE? Or should I remove this driver altogether and go with the official ports one? Thanks a lot in advance for all your help. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:42:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5C416A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: from mail2.worria.com (mail2.worria.com [205.234.133.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 728A313C468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@laws.ms) Received: (qmail 27055 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jun 2007 19:42:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?218.103.163.47?) (sales@worria.com@218.103.163.47) by mail2.worria.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2007 19:42:56 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 218.103.163.47 Message-ID: <466EF739.1090502@laws.ms> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:42:49 +0800 From: Pang User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Weird freebsd gateway question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:56 -0000 Hello, I have followed the document below to set up a gateway for 2 vlans: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-routing.html All servers behind the switch can connect to the Internet without any problems. However, I cannot ping the switch IP from the outside nor inside of the network. I have tried to change the IP of the switch, but still the switch cannot be visible in the network (all servers behind works without any glitch.) Could anyone point me out the error? Below is the network diagram: Internet ----- FreeBSD gateway ---- Switch ---- Few servers For FreeBSD gateway, I have that few lines in /etc/rc.d: defaultrouter="10.0.0.1" gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig_em0="inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252" ifconfig_em1="inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224" static_routes="lan" route_lan="-net 172.16.0.1/24 172.16.0.2" *The IP of the switch is 172.16.0.2 **All actual IPs are changed to dummy IPs. Thanks Pang From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:49:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806EB16A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6934313C483 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578268D2D69; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 450D1404E0; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-a0886bb00000081c-39-466ef8b11010 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 8FDF04006A; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <68FAFDB9-DDCA-4A88-B1EA-26882AD3893F@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:04 -0700 To: Nikos Vassiliadis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:06 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> The DSL router in question is a Thomson Speedtouch 546v6. > > Speedtouch routers had as factory default bridging mode. > A simple revert to factory defaults will probably enable > you to use PPPoE from your FreeBSD box. Just a note of caution about this specific point, against an admirable & detailed reply-- from what I understand from another mailing list is that the newer versions of the Speedtouch DSL modems no longer have the capability of acting in "bridging" mode and will always run in the 1-to-1 NAT translation mode. This turns out to represent a significant problem for people who want to provide NTP services to the world, perhaps via the NTP pool project, as the rather limited NAT state table in these DSL modems easily overflow when dealing with many stateless UDP packets.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 19:49:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E9716A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C3E13C4AD for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6C5EBC78; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:49:22 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Kiffin Gish" Message-Id: <20070612154922.986aa002.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> References: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:49:47 -0000 In response to "Kiffin Gish" : > The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the > following error message: > > --> Failed to load module "nv" > > Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier downloaded > the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had installed it into > the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. > > Do I need to reinstall it but this time in the new environment? > > Is that then under /usr/X11R6? > > How do I tell the make script to point it there, export X11BASE? > > Or should I remove this driver altogether and go with the official ports > one? > > Thanks a lot in advance for all your help. I recommend using the one provided by NVidia, as performance is noticeably better for me. However, there is a port for the nvidia one. Depending on your model of card, use one of the /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-* ports. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 20:34:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE9E16A46D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1B13C43E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CKYPQu034514; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67E67B842; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:25 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Andrew Falanga Message-ID: <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Falanga , freebsd-questions References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:34:27 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:25:38AM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > > You don't need cvsup-without-gui anymore. A rewrite in C called csup is > > part of the base system in 6.2. > > > > This should be fixed in the handbook, as it still references cvsup. > > > > Roland >=20 > Thank you for this. I was not aware. However, would it still not > behoove me to find out what is going on, if there really is a problem? > I'm looking to install WebGUI on this system which requires MySQL and > ImageMagick (both of which are in the ports). Wouldn't a compilation > of other program produce similar results? If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a memory problem. See e.g. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG= 11-FAQ Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGbwNREnfvsMMhpyURAskSAJ9wfzX1ySTDVNxaMo0ryAESwIMSXQCdHZhU gYV/UOdfjZL47DWE5wrFx+w= =0Iey -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 20:49:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EB716A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D0713C487 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79D151931 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:49:18 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070612214918.22f51b58@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> References: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:49:22 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:19 +0200 "Kiffin Gish" wrote: > The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the > following error message: > > --> Failed to load module "nv" > > Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier > downloaded the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had > installed it into the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. nv is the open-source driver from xorg, if your xorg.conf entry specifies nv then you've not actually been the using the driver from the nvidia site, which is called nvidia. x11/nvidia-driver is the port of nvidia's binary, the open source version has only got its own port with the modularization of xorg in 7.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 20:51:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A2216A46E; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F57013C468; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CKBeG7009427; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:11:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:27:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <466B4694.3060204@lbl.gov> <466B4B7E.4000006@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <466B4B7E.4000006@lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121527.04274.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:11:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3411/Tue Jun 12 10:55:03 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: "Jin Guojun \[VFFS\]" , questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:51:26 -0000 On Saturday 09 June 2007 08:53:18 pm Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because > anything equal to or below 1G > > options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" > > will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. > I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size > related. > > > Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, > > following line causes the problem: > > > > options MAXDSIZ="(2097152U*1024)" > > > > Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen > > for some program? This is setting aside 2GB for malloc which leaves only 1GB for all of mmap and stack. You probably don't have enough address space to map your binary. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 20:54:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0550A16A46E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D513C4BF for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070612205447.TKPS3934.mta11.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:54:49 -0000 Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server from servicing these bogus requests? 122-124-129-27.dynamic.hinet.net - - [04/May/2007:04:38:18 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 122-124-129-27.dynamic.hinet.net - - [04/May/2007:04:38:19 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 122-124-129-27.dynamic.hinet.net - - [04/May/2007:04:38:20 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:38 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:38 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:39 -0400] "CONNECT 220.1 kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:44 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php HTT kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:45 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php H 12.40.60.226 - - [04/May/2007:05:30:14 -0400] "GET http://www2.andrews.edu/~bidw 12.40.60.226 - - [04/May/2007:05:30:15 -0400] "GET http://www.anonymitytest.com/ 217.194.139.131 - - [08/May/2007:05:22:03 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.p 217.194.139.131 - - [08/May/2007:05:22:12 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.p 62.159.66.106 - - [09/May/2007:23:57:42 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php 62.159.66.106 - - [09/May/2007:23:57:42 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:40 -0400] "\x04\x01\x1a\vE\x10\xac\"" 400 - "-" "-" r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:50 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "- 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:21 -0400] "GET http://www.internetsec.org/a 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:37 -0400] "\x04\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:52 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" 89.196.21.158 - - [21/May/2007:06:17:46 -0400] "GET http://thecric.free.fr/AZenv 89.196.21.158 - - [21/May/2007:06:18:02 -0400] "\x04\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" 89.196.21.158 - - [21/May/2007:06:18:17 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" host37.kaisha.co.uk - - [10/Jun/2007:15:27:52 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/ host37.kaisha.co.uk - - [10/Jun/2007:15:27:53 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:07:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4CF16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwmcelfresh@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2116B13C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwmcelfresh@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so541634anc for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SNtaTDPeZnRF950oGlGqMqiTtTq1mhRIRWuG7TEnpSZ8F8u+X6rmXaQfc9NRmgt6d5CpLHbgDnaaHbdaWxdBlF6aWMG1ng2Ft10grbC854tNyA5QT8znZ6gcxxJ+bVg/OzVgoNVx3VP3of0kmwFx85OkxZCQdHdQPd12FQWRU+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=S1mw7NjiuyxjOrNXEWGCiSXeQucR+z+OZy1oqEB1pnQ0/G4TT+/dkIi8PoiNfaPDBdz8wD2qzdrGexpgDzx5ZEYlfYmDKuHsLA8xG2egGC+aNTg+e0U3kixyTBWabsRWDuY0pES97P6NopLfBX8zT8/n9DepMca0Fyimpmu5HNQ= Received: by 10.100.207.16 with SMTP id e16mr4383938ang.1181680882205; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.194.10 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:22 -0700 From: "Charlie McElfresh" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:26 -0000 Hi, I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any hints what might be starting it up? I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. Thanks, Charlie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:17:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F53C16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B8F13C45B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CLHc23009953; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 94D36B842; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:38 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Charlie McElfresh Message-ID: <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Charlie McElfresh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:17:40 -0000 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any hints > what might be starting it up? How have you disabled it? It is not enough to do 'sendmail_enable=3D"NO"'. To completely disable sendmail you shoud use 'sendmail_enable=3D"NONE"'. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGbw1yEnfvsMMhpyURAp1VAJ9rXmUG1UBXmBXNC7p5IdfQ++KonwCgjGON DRTFyVaQ3IcKXxp9Kl6JZKo= =O0SE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:20:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBB916A47D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C213C4BC for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from dispatchd.nerdshack.com (julie.lavabit.com [72.249.41.31]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9478DC7B2F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:20:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from endeavour.lordofunix.org (84.79.187.101) by mail.nerdshack.com with ESMTP Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:20:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:20:34 +0200 From: Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070612232034.4048a3fa.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> References: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:36 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:19 +0200 "Kiffin Gish" wrote: > The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the > following error message: > > --> Failed to load module "nv" > Hi Kiffin. Change your /etc/X11/xorg.conf archive. the line now is: Driver "nv" must be: Driver "nvidia" Hope this help. Regards. Jose. > Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier downloaded > the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had installed it into > the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. > > Do I need to reinstall it but this time in the new environment? > > Is that then under /usr/X11R6? > > How do I tell the make script to point it there, export X11BASE? > > Or should I remove this driver altogether and go with the official ports > one? > > Thanks a lot in advance for all your help. > > -- > Kiffin Rex Gish > Gouda, The Netherlands > -- http://www.lordofunix.org/ Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories..... You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:20:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2917E16A475 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D06B13C4C5 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1273D8A7DA2; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 453874010F; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:36 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-9f083bb00000081c-f4-466f0e24b2b9 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 31CFD4007B; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2D981D7A-0303-4A4F-B17C-CEF19FEADADE@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:35 -0700 To: bob@a1poweruser.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:20:37 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote: > Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log > records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect > requests and get > requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can > turn on to stop my server from > servicing these bogus requests? If you have the Apache mod_proxy enabled, either configure it securely or disable it entirely. Also, double-check your use of PHP-based stuff-- the security of PHP is sufficiently bad that it's pretty common for sites to get hacked if they aren't careful about securing it and updating to the latest versions as new security holes in PHP-based stuff are exploited. You might want to run portaudit... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:23:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D3616A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1CC13C4B8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5B08D554A; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 58BE6400F9; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:23:34 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-a1888bb00000081c-ab-466f0ed69bf5 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 427104006A; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:23:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:23:33 -0700 To: Charlie McElfresh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:23:34 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any > hints > what might be starting it up? By default sendmail is available for handling outgoing mail, but is not listening as an MTA for external connections. You can set: sendmail_enable="NONE" ...in /etc/rc.conf to completely disable sendmail. In that case, you ought to disable parts of the daily periodic reporting stuff which involve sendmail. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:30:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE0E16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeining@mail.arc.nasa.gov) Received: from arc.nasa.gov (pony2pub.arc.nasa.gov [128.102.31.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC3413C4BA for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeining@mail.arc.nasa.gov) Received: from [143.232.188.244] (HELO synack) by pony2pub.arc.nasa.gov (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.10) with ESMTP id 36646689 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:30:40 -0700 From: "Joshua Beining" To: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:31:31 -0700 Organization: Nasa Ames Research Center Message-ID: <00c601c7ad30$a9a644b0$f4bce88f@arc.nasa.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Importance: Normal Subject: Enforcing Password History X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jbeining@arc.nasa.gov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:30:43 -0000 I have some 6.1 stable systems that I would like to enforce password histories on. pam_unix, pam_passwdqc and login.conf do not seem to support this functionality. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. -Joshua From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:41:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346C16A46B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032A113C4AD for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn01.u.washington.edu (hymn01.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.55]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5CLfXXp000951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn01.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5CLfXUi030813 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:33 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.2] by hymn01.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:33 PDT Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:41:33 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070612232034.4048a3fa.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.12.141932 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: Subject: Re: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:41:34 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:42:19 +0200 > "Kiffin Gish" wrote: > >> The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the >> following error message: >> >> --> Failed to load module "nv" >> > Hi Kiffin. > > Change your /etc/X11/xorg.conf archive. the line now is: > > Driver "nv" > > must be: > > Driver "nvidia" > > Hope this help. > > Regards. > > Jose. > >> Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier downloaded >> the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had installed it into >> the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. >> >> Do I need to reinstall it but this time in the new environment? >> >> Is that then under /usr/X11R6? >> >> How do I tell the make script to point it there, export X11BASE? >> >> Or should I remove this driver altogether and go with the official ports >> one? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance for all your help. >> >> -- >> Kiffin Rex Gish >> Gouda, The Netherlands >> > > -- > http://www.lordofunix.org/ > > Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. > Registered BSD User 51101. > Registered Linux User #213309. > Memories..... You are talking about memories. > Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. ** x11-drivers/nvidia-driver only works with i386 at this time. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:43:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2843516A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8414413C480 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CLh187025731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:02 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:43:01 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charlie McElfresh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:05 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Charlie McElfresh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any hints >> what might be starting it up? > > How have you disabled it? It is not enough to do 'sendmail_enable="NO"'. > To completely disable sendmail you shoud use 'sendmail_enable="NONE"'. sendmail_enable="NO" and sendmail_enable="NONE" are the same and the first one is already present by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf In order to disable the submission and hence stop sendmail completely, the following should be added into /etc/rc.conf: sendmail_submit_enable="NO" Regards, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:47:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411C316A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prometheusrj@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7F13C465 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prometheusrj@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so3603888pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:47:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AVlUiEWlQiLfwqb/PozmzL4najLucypW3t/NL792lT3N9GtbnF+46fa8J8Rcnuf7pn6vuAkJOFeLtssdJzcBc3dpsccTfGI0sSfj2/3eGeBQ3ir59dHD79yvQ2oTK8DNIOSDsiES0XIzNELS/RFdn37zpajypV6CEVgnOX4yVQE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AA2LcbpFcGDdrThlOufmMyAjI9wxuyIekUpCQGTvB+p8DOYa6tTSMkdsTyOkMA68tlUq3VVYWtrJrVF20u6ED4IZZTynuUyDbqRL1egKalUK3mhOV5NS2fBouiYzu2rvxgjKT/MKNIkweXt9xZNLU9HmIWClyzJnofFJXXKfZN0= Received: by 10.65.100.14 with SMTP id c14mr12276157qbm.1181683210724; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.91.10 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:20:10 -0300 From: "Pedro Pires" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: problems while running wmweather+ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:47:02 -0000 I'm having problems to run wmweather+. I already found my location at NWS Internet Weather Source , but the manual is a little confusing about how to run it. I tried: #wmweather+ -station "22'55S 043'10W" And it shows : *wmweather+: download of /home/fawz/.wmweather+/000003A9.0001- 83743.new-metar.txt failed: Fatal Error: 404 Not Found (Not Found) * My station is : WMO Index Number: 83743 Station Name: Rio De Janeiro Country: Brazil WMO Region: 3 Station Position: 22-55S 043-10W (dms) Station Elevation (Ha): 5 Meters Upper Air Position: 22-54S 043-10W (dms) Upper Air Elevation (Hp): 3 Meters I can't find anything wrong. The app opens but it has no data, besides the error. I would thx for any help =D Thx for the atention. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:48:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BC416A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@adventuras.no) Received: from mail.adventuras.no (mail.adventuras.no [194.63.250.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9A013C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@adventuras.no) Received: from ladyda.hovin.local (hjem [84.209.202.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.adventuras.no (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5CLPTt9052259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:25:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@adventuras.no) Message-ID: <466F0F49.3030108@adventuras.no> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:25:29 +0200 From: Lars Kristiansen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us References: <466D925A.3000009@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> <20070612120229.F86945@fledge.watson.org> <466ED64B.4070107@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <466ED64B.4070107@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Adventuras: du kan filtrere etter AdvSpamScore over 5-10 X-Adventuras-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.281, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 2.12, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: lars@adventuras.no X-Spam-Status: No Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backspace problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:48:50 -0000 > Thanks for the info Doug. A friend of mine set me on the right path. I > have been using vi in linux, except it was not vi. Vi was aliased to > vim. I had installed vim on my FreeBSD server the other day, but that > did not fix it. I found out that it has to be run with 'set nocp' so > that it does not run in vi compatibility mode. > > I did this and now my backspace and delete work like I want them to. :) > > I appreciate the replies. For vim, my favorite is this: cp /usr/local/share/vim/vim70/vimrc_example.vim ~/.vimrc Regards, Lars From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:49:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A4916A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494BE13C468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F088D611E; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1D9F7300B6; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807125-a1767bb000000801-8a-466f14de581f Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 053F930063; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:49:17 -0700 To: Mikhail Goriachev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:49:18 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: >> How have you disabled it? It is not enough to do >> 'sendmail_enable="NO"'. >> To completely disable sendmail you shoud use >> 'sendmail_enable="NONE"'. > > sendmail_enable="NO" and sendmail_enable="NONE" are the same and > the first one is already present by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf No, they aren't identical. See /etc/rc.d/sendmail: case ${sendmail_enable} in [Nn][Oo][Nn][Ee]) sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" ;; esac > In order to disable the submission and hence stop sendmail > completely, the following should be added into /etc/rc.conf: > > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" This is a partial solution. The complete set of variables is listed above or in /etc/defaults/rc.conf... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:51:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6243316A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFF213C44B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-10-135.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.10.135]:51298 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with smtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HyEHO-0000go-3k for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:51:58 +0200 Received: (qmail 3121 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 23:51:55 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 23:51:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 91819 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Jun 2007 23:51:55 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:51:55 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Mikhail Goriachev Message-ID: <20070612215155.GA91739@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Mikhail Goriachev , Charlie McElfresh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.10.135 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HyEHO-0000go-3k. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HyEHO-0000go-3k 043b5ee7a3728ea8a8a8cad77f516042 Cc: Charlie McElfresh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:51:59 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:43:01AM +1000, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any hints > >> what might be starting it up? > > > >How have you disabled it? It is not enough to do 'sendmail_enable="NO"'. > >To completely disable sendmail you shoud use 'sendmail_enable="NONE"'. > > sendmail_enable="NO" and sendmail_enable="NONE" are the same No, they are not. > and the > first one is already present by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > In order to disable the submission and hence stop sendmail completely, > the following should be added into /etc/rc.conf: > > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" Yes, but 'sendmail_submit_enable="NONE"' implies 'sendmail_submit_enable="NO"'. Setting 'sendmail_enable="NONE"' will indeed completely disable sendmail. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:58:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DCF16A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA96513C45B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id z31so1709026nzd for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:58:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BMxkPqXAajb9LJbCb44jHBpnBXnqzsSfed2z7u0pjwSlgokI5suZg5cytBhLUA+6XVwY4m3zzr/NSWkC7T456XjyhG4xJXZjhIaSV8mdDOSKTsI0jmK7Xx2dhJLCCLiRQhVcpyIdgNqJSZUrr2TmwIqAle8eVjPJyBJLoqNCDII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jctlDIcNezCTqjYh1xRkUTnc6V6b7TovSMAMrHF6guo5sW5ZZe5XUCs7/CDhf4ChUVLG+SggHmY979Dt8yw5zjj4ozynicW3p3n4eI/cslrjOknNYXMuzvv4KyNNyCdPHpf1g3egDnA96wQ4Nor52+d1mLA7cpbKOkuVSlJMnxU= Received: by 10.142.251.9 with SMTP id y9mr372100wfh.1181685495361; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.254.1 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <26ddd1750706121458n72809abei2296e79caa3f12ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:58:15 -0400 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <466EF52D.2080800@jessikat.plus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466EF52D.2080800@jessikat.plus.net> Subject: Re: iwi won't switch on at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:17 -0000 On 6/12/07, Robin Becker wrote: > I have an acer laptop with an intel 2200 wifi; when I had PCBSD 1.3 > installed I could boot from cold and have the wireless start up properly > (it's using wpa with a hidden ssid ap). After I installed freebsd 6.2 I > cannot get the wireless to come up on first boot. I seem to have to > switch the wireless on and then reboot. I think under PCBSD is used to > have to do something like > sysctl dev.iwi.0.radio=1 > in one of the startup scripts to make this work. Now however when I > execute that I see a message saying that oid is read only. Is there some > way to get this wifi starting properly again? > > -- > Robin Becker > > various bits of information > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD xxx.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 > UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > $ kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 15 0xc0400000 70794c kernel > 2 1 0xc0b08000 1adb8 linux.ko > 3 1 0xc0b23000 e1a8 if_iwi.ko > 4 2 0xc0b32000 2d60 firmware.ko > 5 1 0xc0b35000 2cf4 wlan_acl.ko > 6 1 0xc0b38000 59f20 acpi.ko > 7 1 0xc4f27000 4000 logo_saver.ko > $ pkg_info | grep iwi > iwi-firmware-2.4_7 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Driver Firmware > iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_2 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Firmware Kernel Module > > $ cat /boot/loader.conf > if_iwi_load="YES" > firmware_load="YES" > wlan_load="YES" > wlan_acl_load="YES" > wlan_wep_load="YES" > wlan_ccmp_load="YES" > wlan_tkip_load="YES" > > messages > ====== initial boot > Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: mem 0xb010 > 1000-0xb0101fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6 > Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:a1:2e:8e > Jun 10 08:53:01 xxx kernel: iwi0: radio turned off > > ====== after switch pressed > Jun 10 08:55:17 xxx kernel: iwi0: radio turned on > > ====== after reboot > Jun 10 09:14:44 xxx kernel: iwi0: mem 0xb010 > 1000-0xb0101fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6 > Jun 10 09:14:44 xxx kernel: iwi0: Ethernet address: 00:13:ce:a1:2e:8e Take a look at this thread, it helped me get iwi working on my Fujitsu laptop: http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=48251&page=2&pp=15#postmenu_254754 - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 21:58:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE7D16A4C6 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0262A13C45E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070612215825.YBBC3934.mta11.adelphia.net@laptop>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:58:25 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "Chuck Swiger" Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:58:25 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: <2D981D7A-0303-4A4F-B17C-CEF19FEADADE@mac.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:58:26 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote: > Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log > records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect > requests and get > requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can > turn on to stop my server from > servicing these bogus requests? If you have the Apache mod_proxy enabled, either configure it securely or disable it entirely. Also, double-check your use of PHP-based stuff-- the security of PHP is sufficiently bad that it's pretty common for sites to get hacked if they aren't careful about securing it and updating to the latest versions as new security holes in PHP-based stuff are exploited. You might want to run portaudit... -- -Chuck -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 5:21 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests I all ready have Apache mod_proxy commented out in httpd.conf and there is no php stuff installed in system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:01:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2B16A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from shanshito.webanoide.org (shanshito.webanoide.org [150.101.108.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D1013C455 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from maxito.hba.navalradio.cl (maxito.hba.navalradio.cl [172.26.4.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by shanshito.webanoide.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CM0vr7026092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:00:58 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <466F1799.3010104@webanoide.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:00:57 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev Organization: Webanoide User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> <20070612211738.GA76150@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <466F1365.8060207@webanoide.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:01:01 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: >>> How have you disabled it? It is not enough to do >>> 'sendmail_enable="NO"'. >>> To completely disable sendmail you shoud use >>> 'sendmail_enable="NONE"'. >> sendmail_enable="NO" and sendmail_enable="NONE" are the same and >> the first one is already present by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > No, they aren't identical. See /etc/rc.d/sendmail: > > case ${sendmail_enable} in > [Nn][Oo][Nn][Ee]) > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > ;; > esac > >> In order to disable the submission and hence stop sendmail >> completely, the following should be added into /etc/rc.conf: >> >> sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > > This is a partial solution. The complete set of variables is listed > above or in /etc/defaults/rc.conf... Oops... I stand corrected. My apologies for the noise. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:06:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA7316A539 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF6313C4C7 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net) Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070612215641m1300a9lime>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:56:41 +0000 Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 495E217280; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:56:41 -0700 From: Clint Olsen To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070612215641.GA6291@0lsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: NULlsen Network X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Cc: Subject: Issue with gdb attaching to a process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:06:44 -0000 I'm having trouble attaching to a process on my FreeBSD system. I've never heard of this error: FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36 PDT 2006 root@belle.0lsen.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ... (gdb) attach 6300 Attaching to process 6300 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/libgdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/solib-svr4.c:1443: internal-error: legacy_fetch_link_map_offsets called without legacy link_map support enabled. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Quit this debugging session? (y or n) y /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/libgdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/solib-svr4.c:1443: internal-error: legacy_fetch_link_map_offsets called without legacy link_map support enabled. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) y -Clint From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:22:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BB916A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACE513C458 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so4431wxd for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.11.1 with SMTP id 1mr944591wxk.1181686943603; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h35sm18534wxd.2007.06.12.15.22.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:22:53 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070612182012.463C.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:24 -0000 On June 12, 2007 at 04:41PM Charlie McElfresh wrote: > I have sendmail disabled in rc.conf, but it starts up anyway. Any hints > what might be starting it up? >=20 > I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. =46rom the following page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail-changingmta.= html 26.4.2.3 FreeBSD 5.0-STABLE and Later In order to completely disable sendmail, including the outgoing mail servic= e, you must use sendmail_enable=3D"NO" sendmail_submit_enable=3D"NO" sendmail_outbound_enable=3D"NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable=3D"NO" in /etc/rc.conf. If you only want to disable sendmail's incoming mail service, you should se= t sendmail_enable=3D"NO" --=20 Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:30:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D09E16A469 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E544D13C458 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from photon.locolomo.org (unknown [10.35.4.65]) by strange.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150202E01E; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466F1E9D.7070803@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:30:53 +0200 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070522) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <68FAFDB9-DDCA-4A88-B1EA-26882AD3893F@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <68FAFDB9-DDCA-4A88-B1EA-26882AD3893F@mac.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000407000108070003010506" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:30:55 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000407000108070003010506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >>> The DSL router in question is a Thomson Speedtouch 546v6. >> Speedtouch routers had as factory default bridging mode. >> A simple revert to factory defaults will probably enable >> you to use PPPoE from your FreeBSD box. > > Just a note of caution about this specific point, against an > admirable & detailed reply-- from what I understand from another > mailing list is that the newer versions of the Speedtouch DSL modems > no longer have the capability of acting in "bridging" mode and will > always run in the 1-to-1 NAT translation mode. Thanks Chuck, the Speedtouch I have has two modes PPPoE and RFC 1483, however, entering RFC 1483 mode it requested that I enter the public IP!? Haven't got it working yet. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org --------------ms000407000108070003010506 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK6DCC BXAwggRYoAMCAQICBEVUK6IwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwMTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNV BAoTA1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0EwHhcNMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WhcNMDgxMTE1 MDkwMTU0WjB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEpMCcGA1UEChMgSW5nZW4gb3JnYW5pc2F0b3Jpc2sg dGlsa255dG5pbmcxOzAUBgNVBAMUDUVyaWsgTvhyZ2FhcmQwIwYDVQQFExxQSUQ6OTgwMi0y MDAyLTItNTQ0MzY5NzY5MzE1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1/K6+GVcF UvoWJpyfhzWbu8qEOB8jU17A0dpmts7RT+ODkYq0lxJCcvvdSXNQQurvYwaPISA+EMRy+rIm rjhoyxhsM9w/XC7gELqkr1XbGt3wR0KLr5ZcRfD4HqrWM1Eh1OYxTXKod6Ox/FAqzDAy91x8 XCZzsHtiBCdgMSYxqwIDAQABo4ICzjCCAsowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgP4MCsGA1UdEAQkMCKA DzIwMDYxMTE1MDgzMTU0WoEPMjAwODExMTUwOTAxNTRaMIIBNwYDVR0gBIIBLjCCASowggEm BgoqgVCBKQEBAQEDMIIBFjAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYjaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRr L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkwgeIGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHVMAoWA1REQzADAgEBGoHGRm9yIGFudmVuZGVs c2UgYWYgY2VydGlmaWthdGV0IGfmbGRlciBPQ0VTIHZpbGvlciwgQ1BTIG9nIE9DRVMgQ1As IGRlciBrYW4gaGVudGVzIGZyYSB3d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LiBCZW3m cmssIGF0IFREQyBlZnRlciB2aWxr5XJlbmUgaGFyIGV0IGJlZ3LmbnNldCBhbnN2YXIgaWZ0 LiBwcm9mZXNzaW9uZWxsZSBwYXJ0ZXIuMEEGCCsGAQUFBwEBBDUwMzAxBggrBgEFBQcwAYYl aHR0cDovL29jc3AuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9vY3NwL3N0YXR1czAgBgNVHREEGTAXgRVub3Jn YWFyZEBsb2NvbG9tby5vcmcwgYQGA1UdHwR9MHswS6BJoEekRTBDMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQTEQMA4GA1UEAxMHQ1JMMTU1NzAs oCqgKIYmaHR0cDovL2NybC5vY2VzLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2Nlcy5jcmwwHwYDVR0jBBgw FoAUYLWF7FZkfhIZJ2cdUBVLc647+RIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPd+a0ceJ9JmK934UXsB3G0mjv+f MAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwGQYJKoZIhvZ9B0EABAwwChsEVjcuMQMCA6gwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAD ggEBAE9KhX+l/ZcnhvGPhHyWnJspyCXSiuqZ+GlgMdcKXtlu8kXsqNzfDe9qSs93++zJS+HT vAW0QgyIxjY1VpgCqgyjU8e2d2D1eSRMDB09WViZk8oZkvOy0Mq3yy//CLSw3gQbXNZF+Yt+ htss+FD+idACVyRBQqlcHuaxjguyzZkK0fGBN5H5nsklDySQCU7X0i3egeIiL7zlV3cjp9KT 12tNG4jfQTaSUzBkz0R+x+Jcdyp6AI9Qg3H1iGDDI58aCTY5ohQBpDsUcLr6U842IACNCeub qDP6nDo5lnMEXwGH/RO8r4supCf5wrNRjqEX/vokUzB5QfDGtmxxZkycaaQwggVwMIIEWKAD AgECAgRFVCuiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMx FDASBgNVBAMTC1REQyBPQ0VTIENBMB4XDTA2MTExNTA4MzE1NFoXDTA4MTExNTA5MDE1NFow dTELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEluZ2VuIG9yZ2FuaXNhdG9yaXNrIHRpbGtueXRu aW5nMTswFAYDVQQDFA1FcmlrIE74cmdhYXJkMCMGA1UEBRMcUElEOjk4MDItMjAwMi0yLTU0 NDM2OTc2OTMxNTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAtfyuvhlXBVL6Fiacn4c1 m7vKhDgfI1NewNHaZrbO0U/jg5GKtJcSQnL73UlzUELq72MGjyEgPhDEcvqyJq44aMsYbDPc P1wu4BC6pK9V2xrd8EdCi6+WXEXw+B6q1jNRIdTmMU1yqHejsfxQKswwMvdcfFwmc7B7YgQn YDEmMasCAwEAAaOCAs4wggLKMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwID+DArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDA2MTEx NTA4MzE1NFqBDzIwMDgxMTE1MDkwMTU0WjCCATcGA1UdIASCAS4wggEqMIIBJgYKKoFQgSkB AQEBAzCCARYwLwYIKwYBBQUHAgEWI2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2VydGlmaWthdC5kay9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MIHiBggrBgEFBQcCAjCB1TAKFgNUREMwAwIBARqBxkZvciBhbnZlbmRlbHNlIGFmIGNl cnRpZmlrYXRldCBn5mxkZXIgT0NFUyB2aWxr5XIsIENQUyBvZyBPQ0VTIENQLCBkZXIga2Fu IGhlbnRlcyBmcmEgd3d3LmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvcmVwb3NpdG9yeS4gQmVt5nJrLCBhdCBU REMgZWZ0ZXIgdmlsa+VyZW5lIGhhciBldCBiZWdy5m5zZXQgYW5zdmFyIGlmdC4gcHJvZmVz c2lvbmVsbGUgcGFydGVyLjBBBggrBgEFBQcBAQQ1MDMwMQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGJWh0dHA6Ly9v Y3NwLmNlcnRpZmlrYXQuZGsvb2NzcC9zdGF0dXMwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVbm9yZ2FhcmRAbG9j b2xvbW8ub3JnMIGEBgNVHR8EfTB7MEugSaBHpEUwQzELMAkGA1UEBhMCREsxDDAKBgNVBAoT A1REQzEUMBIGA1UEAxMLVERDIE9DRVMgQ0ExEDAOBgNVBAMTB0NSTDE1NTcwLKAqoCiGJmh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwub2Nlcy5jZXJ0aWZpa2F0LmRrL29jZXMuY3JsMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFGC1hexW ZH4SGSdnHVAVS3OuO/kSMB0GA1UdDgQWBBT3fmtHHifSZivd+FF7AdxtJo7/nzAJBgNVHRME AjAAMBkGCSqGSIb2fQdBAAQMMAobBFY3LjEDAgOoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBPSoV/ pf2XJ4bxj4R8lpybKcgl0orqmfhpYDHXCl7ZbvJF7Kjc3w3vakrPd/vsyUvh07wFtEIMiMY2 NVaYAqoMo1PHtndg9XkkTAwdPVlYmZPKGZLzstDKt8sv/wi0sN4EG1zWRfmLfobbLPhQ/onQ AlckQUKpXB7msY4Lss2ZCtHxgTeR+Z7JJQ8kkAlO19It3oHiIi+85Vd3I6fSk9drTRuI30E2 klMwZM9EfsfiXHcqegCPUINx9YhgwyOfGgk2OaIUAaQ7FHC6+lPONiAAjQnrm6gz+pw6OZZz BF8Bh/0TvK+LLqQn+cKzUY6hF/76JFMweUHwxrZscWZMnGmkMYICKjCCAiYCAQEwOTAxMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJESzEMMAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojAJ BgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBRzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEP Fw0wNzA2MTIyMjMwNTNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBT8fTtO941KPhtBeM4yw72t6ts7AzBI BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxOzA5MDExCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRLMQwwCgYDVQQKEwNUREMxFDASBgNVBAMT C1REQyBPQ0VTIENBAgRFVCuiMEoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTugOTAxMQswCQYDVQQGEwJESzEM MAoGA1UEChMDVERDMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtUREMgT0NFUyBDQQIERVQrojBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASBgH1EA308BgHRbj5qFaotzSnq+0BR 7vNIEy71r+BUyuKnELL14DvzFFdyJRKwc4zmOya/WHS6bdLtiNcp2fkh5BIfAHURc4mU0xjl +r8tyrpiQWsrRykvLrIT4epPMgYuK4xQbfSa8R8sNWXVKQ7jircPI9+29nM7iIbNgNIUu/KQ AAAAAAAA --------------ms000407000108070003010506-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:34:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF8416A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fkraiem@free.fr) Received: from smtp24.orange.fr (smtp24.orange.fr [193.252.22.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B1613C457 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fkraiem@free.fr) Received: from smtp24.orange.fr (mwinf2437 [10.232.5.137]) by mwinf2440.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 171F21C257D4 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:53:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2437.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D6D6A1C000AB; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:53:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.204.62] (LAubervilliers-153-52-38-99.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.221.99]) by mwinf2437.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9A6A01C000A1; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:53:40 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070612195340632.9A6A01C000A1@mwinf2437.orange.fr From: Firas Kraiem To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:53:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> In-Reply-To: <000001c7ad29$caa20a70$6601a8c0@KGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706122153.35541.fkraiem@free.fr> Cc: Kiffin Gish Subject: Re: Failed to load module "nv" ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:34:23 -0000 Hi The nv driver is part of the official Xorg distribution. Make sure you have the x11/xorg metaport installed as it contains all the official drivers : $ cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg $ sudo make install clean Also, make sure the ModulePath line in your xorg.conf points to the correct location (i.e. /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R6), an easy way to do that is to let Xorg regenerate a new file with # X -cnfigure About the official nvidia drivers, I had no problem installing them using the x11/nvidia-driver port instead of building from the nvidia tarball directly. Firas On Tuesday 12 June 2007 21:42:19 Kiffin Gish wrote: > The other day I upgraded to xorg 7.2 but when I run startx I get the > following error message: > > --> Failed to load module "nv" > > Rather that using the nvidia driver from the ports I had earlier downloaded > the official freebsd driver from the nvidia site, but had installed it into > the old xorg environment under /usr/X11R6. > > Do I need to reinstall it but this time in the new environment? > > Is that then under /usr/X11R6? > > How do I tell the make script to point it there, export X11BASE? > > Or should I remove this driver altogether and go with the official ports > one? > > Thanks a lot in advance for all your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:55:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41BB16A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8525313C46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:55:35 -0400 id 00056416.466F2467.0000F5A1 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 17:55:35 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Jonathan Delgado , nicolaw@cpan.org In-Reply-To: References: <1180722572.30575.8.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <20070601151507.R2699@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-13 Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:55:34 -0400 Message-Id: <1181688934.88230.35.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: delgado@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: megacli and PERC5 (PowerEdge 1950) on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:55:36 -0000 On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:54 -0400, Jonathan Delgado wrote: > The patches seem to have made their way into 6_RELENG yesterday > (6/6/07). > > I did a fresh rebuild on one of my 1950s with 6_RELENG and it seems > to now work as expected. Hopefully this makes it's way into the next > release. I don't follow things close enough to get a sense of if this > is the type of change that could get merged into 6.2 (it would be > nice though). > > On a quasi-related note, I'm not how many people out there are using > MegaCli in order to do some Nagios-based monitoring, but I wrote my > own humble Nagios plugin for it and it is at http://www.techno- > obscura.com/~delgado/weblog/archives/2007/06/check_megaraid.html > (there is a check_perc5i plugin on Nagios Exchange, but I had issues I actually updated Nicola's code to make it work on FreeBSD/amd64: http://www.nagiosexchange.org/Hardware.56.0.html?&tx_netnagext_pi1[page]=10%3A10 I posted my changes back to nagiosexchange, as I encourage you (Jonathan) to do so the same (hopefully the Apache license is okay with this): http://www.nagiosexchange.org/Hardware.56.0.html?&tx_netnagext_pi1[p_view]=1007&tx_netnagext_pi1[page]=10%3A10 ~BAS P.S. Nicola, nick Dick Cheney post on your blog. Also, be sure to check out "Jose Chungÿs From Outer Space". Season 3, Episode 20. ~BAS > with it so I wrote my own). I have been using it with my Linux > systems so far, but look forwarding to being able to slap it on our > new FreeBSD boxes now. > > -Jonathan > > On Jun 1, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > > > > amd64/113232 opened > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113232 > > > > ~BAS > > > -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:59:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E14416A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C245213C447 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bidjan@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so10591wra for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:59:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BnAmC5UE1c0UetFo8Wsm7tg1JkKHIBdQ4CBRJ9oo2rarMXJdusHmrJZdO+uK4Rxhe12g3or8bhZO191DSSDg0WL/A1kUGHw9LQ92+xvo6CPyJJN9SK5yYPfMvOdT9ry/yyKiloWltBEL9wj0CEyQU06GkrHCUn476QrnqWf1L1U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BDiDf4SNT+D4TyZ8KzCdVCG2FupVCTbMw8J8cZRufIaIds++GPoef7fknYspP/uaR5m8MdyOWIPyBDKq+18N9IRBUYAxnOdBJcJtT6B32N4mKhda87w4Jbkdf6oUAbo1TFxKnBjVW2VIsdzY93qWzoy7wdF6v68xZyZ/QK/fCeI= Received: by 10.143.37.20 with SMTP id p20mr370217wfj.1181687451057; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.101.16 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:30:51 -0400 From: "Pablo Mora" To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070612182012.463C.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44b41e4e0706121341o13788520gd249f740e47589c3@mail.gmail.com> <20070612182012.463C.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> Subject: Re: sendmail startup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:59:10 -0000 cat /usr/ports/mail/postfix/pkg-message -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PGP KeyID: 0xC730A079 Key fingerprint = F626 3C47 02F5 E43C 6620 8A1B E7A8 533B C730 A079 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys C730A079 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML e-mail & Microsoft Attachments FreeBSD Since 4.x & unixbsd.blogspot.com maintainer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:10:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889CE16A473 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B28C13C46A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 15248 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2007 23:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2007 23:07:16 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5CNArrC018623 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:10:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5CNAqR1018622 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:10:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:10:52 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:10:54 -0000 No matter what I try to look up with ri (the Ruby information utility that is used to look up stuff about classes, methods, et cetera, from the command line), it returns the same result: > ri Time.strftime Nothing known about Time.strftime I don't see anything in /usr/ports/lang that seems to relate to the matter of ensuring ri has a database of information to share. What am I missing? How can I get ri working properly on FreeBSD? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Dr. Ron Paul: "Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:13:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283BE16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1037E13C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F270C8D82AF; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id DDE7E400F9; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:44 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-9f884bb00000081c-ee-466f28a8877f Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id C761F400F7; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <466F1E9D.7070803@locolomo.org> References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <68FAFDB9-DDCA-4A88-B1EA-26882AD3893F@mac.com> <466F1E9D.7070803@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:44 -0700 To: Erik Norgaard X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nikos Vassiliadis Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:13:45 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: >> Just a note of caution about this specific point, against an >> admirable & detailed reply-- from what I understand from another >> mailing list is that the newer versions of the Speedtouch DSL >> modems no longer have the capability of acting in "bridging" mode >> and will always run in the 1-to-1 NAT translation mode. > > Thanks Chuck, the Speedtouch I have has two modes PPPoE and RFC > 1483, however, entering RFC 1483 mode it requested that I enter the > public IP!? I think that you need to enter that only if you actually have a static IP, rather than a dynamically assigned IP via DHCP or PPPoE negotiation. If the USB modem device is actually running correctly in bridging mode, ithen t doesn't need to have an IP assigned to it-- whatever handles PPPoE, such as your FreeBSD box running ppp or something like a Linksys/D-Link/etc broadband router, will get assigned an dynamic publically-routable IP address. Make sure you've set your MTU for that interface down to 1492 if you are using PPPoE. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:15:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062816A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Viraj.Dixit@CityofPaloAlto.org) Received: from xmail.cityofpaloalto.org (cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us [199.33.32.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D82713C484 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Viraj.Dixit@CityofPaloAlto.org) Received: from xpo.staff.copa ([172.17.1.12]) by xmail.cityofpaloalto.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:03:39 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7AD45.E9679B97" Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:03:38 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Filesystem Full Thread-Index: AcetRelgbXb144nUR3WrVT1wnq2oaA== From: "Dixit, Viraj" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2007 23:03:39.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA0DA560:01C7AD45] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Filesystem Full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:15:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7AD45.E9679B97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks, My FreeBSD 5.3 system message logs are showing me this info, Jun 12 14:53:48 gatekeeper kernel: pid 58059 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber 141313 on /u sr: filesystem full Jun 12 15:34:17 gatekeeper kernel: pid 60158 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber 141313 on /u sr: filesystem full I am not finding any data files being uploaded in that volume. This is what the df commands shows. After going through the /usr volume, there is no indication that anything has changed. /dev/da0s1a 537936 36250 458652 7% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/da0s1e 10755828 844602 9050760 9% /local /dev/da0s1f 7529054 7381944 -455214 107% /usr /dev/da0s1d 14526318 9898206 3466008 74% /var Any ideas! Thanks, VJ ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7AD45.E9679B97-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:17:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80116A400 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D03E13C4BC for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A1E1A4D80; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31811513C5; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 28F1BBE7C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:17:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Dixit, Viraj" Message-ID: <20070612231742.GA21836@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem Full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:17:44 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:03:38PM -0700, Dixit, Viraj wrote: > Folks, > > My FreeBSD 5.3 system message logs are showing me this info, > > Jun 12 14:53:48 gatekeeper kernel: pid 58059 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > Jun 12 15:34:17 gatekeeper kernel: pid 60158 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > > I am not finding any data files being uploaded in that volume. This is > what the df commands shows. After going through the /usr volume, there > is no indication that anything has changed. > > /dev/da0s1a 537936 36250 458652 7% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > /dev/da0s1e 10755828 844602 9050760 9% /local > /dev/da0s1f 7529054 7381944 -455214 107% /usr > /dev/da0s1d 14526318 9898206 3466008 74% /var > > Any ideas! Thanks, > VJ See the FAQ. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:28:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F06E16A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E160913C44C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so32614pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c9IUcEwZ3SljFbiL1lNQOH1kklU84MnvjAZLDPTpXyXbvlBM2fBTmk0esu+gYv96QkAIfzoAJn506gShShMS1XcvxjBdSy6xlK7l9B+6O0XMlCMXK3iRzH6lweuFUiDWqTtVd4wYH5mAIJXlC/eIz/pRz/P+tizm99C7ohwm8jA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k326kuZ08drIWpPVPIxwXAH+vsTgVtvvpwbh4IgixC1f8SMjMjWkj+XutcWdUET+FdGIyTVbkPtcgAlYb1qhNNttx2OJOq5yQ9DSzeE9vSBoBqrAdsOUiVDbjSzbUwaNk9OhO1x5MvrVemBCwRKnBdqV4ePwZ//679hF/33S2z0= Received: by 10.35.103.6 with SMTP id f6mr16344pym.1181690895349; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:28:15 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Andrew Falanga" , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Cc: Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:28:16 -0000 > > If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a > memory problem. See e.g. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ > > Roland Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a work around? http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html This machine I'm having problems with is an AMD K6. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:38:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A56416A468 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8371113C46A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A3B8AB278; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 5EBED400EC; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-a0886bb00000081c-f0-466f2e7efa07 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 47AB040077; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:38:37 -0700 To: bob@a1poweruser.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:38:38 -0000 On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Bob wrote: > I all ready have Apache mod_proxy commented out in httpd.conf and > there is > no php stuff installed in system. Your logfile lines seemed to be oddly truncated, so it's a bit hard to tell, but it sure seemed like some of the requests you showed were getting 200 success responses. I assume you aren't IPs 89.196.37.169 or 122.124.129.55? The requests for AZ.php or azenv.php are trying to reference scripts used to control and "rate" lists of "anonymous" proxies that tend to run either on hacked systems or systems configured to permit the world to use the proxy (generally because of a lack of admin clue rather than by intent). See: http://web.freerk.com/proxyjudge/azenv.htm ...and: http://forum.my-proxy.com/index.php?topic=48.0 ...which actually lists this "http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php" host... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 23:52:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4200016A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E4513C448 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CNpvUp073744; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:51:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: kde@mail.kde.org Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:51:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706121851.57408.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on pollux.dfwlp.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: cannot select arts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:52:00 -0000 cc: freebsd-questions: i have 2 systems, both FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5, both KDE 3.5.6. one system was built from ports (which for you non bsd'rs, is like building from sources), and one system i configured using pre-built packages from the FreeBSD packages-6-stable directory. the system i built myself from ports, all multimedia apps are working properly with arts. anything that would need to select arts as the output plugin, can (ie, amarok, mplayer). my other system which i built from the packages, has the same arts pieces installed as my properly working station, but none of the multimedia apps regocnoze this, and arts is not a selection in the drop downs. when i open a terminal on both stations and type 'arts[tab]', the exact same set of executable binaries shows up in the choice of autocompletions. this system, will play sounds (ie, logon, errors), but apps that specifically want arts wont work at first. if i get into all the places i can, and select OSS sound system, amarok will work for one session, but when i restart everything, back to square one. is there somewhere in kde that i can specify that i want arts to be an available option to multimedia apps? thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 01:07:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8554116A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4175B13C4B0 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so9238anc for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=d44nNq8xYSeekqLWqbamk1jGDPSH/TOuG6Zi5Ow2h1G8RXPwtjdo5mk2Ybr0slm5exN0a1FetL9VNO4HIDwxmo3YT3/JJYMh47hKTJFx7lH2UZ6OYR/vBOI/2mztsBjWVyK+yS5qO178+m4LBDJpc4VcOr1pUTfwKz5F9HXZYpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gxyHEgWixXxS9sgTL1WNT9XWFOodrWn2tgxV1umy+iJ8OeAirxlKNe/RwH5z16axwakF5GkQQ3s/Us9Lz5NQWFc7eZqPJIrJ5nVqKhjFKVcAJehwTqe/Kn9AFVWbmNNVJ1kCTbKiFG07rpc94IM8iYW5WtUdFeM29vIs72BLEPA= Received: by 10.101.68.18 with SMTP id v18mr17265ank.1181696874702; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.124.4 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:07:54 +0800 From: "Daniel Marsh" To: "Dixit, Viraj" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem Full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:07:55 -0000 On 6/13/07, Dixit, Viraj wrote: > > Folks, > > My FreeBSD 5.3 system message logs are showing me this info, > > Jun 12 14:53:48 gatekeeper kernel: pid 58059 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > Jun 12 15:34:17 gatekeeper kernel: pid 60158 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > > I am not finding any data files being uploaded in that volume. This is > what the df commands shows. After going through the /usr volume, there > is no indication that anything has changed. > > /dev/da0s1a 537936 36250 458652 7% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > /dev/da0s1e 10755828 844602 9050760 9% /local > /dev/da0s1f 7529054 7381944 -455214 107% /usr > /dev/da0s1d 14526318 9898206 3466008 74% /var > > Any ideas! Thanks, > VJ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Did you actually read the output of df ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 01:43:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BDA16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B40013C45A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm58aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070613014319.ERBG15694.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm58aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:19 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm58aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070613014319.KMLD25069.ibm58aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:19 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20070612213832.043d9bf0@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:43:26 -0400 To: "Dixit, Viraj" , From: r17fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Filesystem Full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:20 -0000 At 07:03 PM 6/12/2007, Dixit, Viraj wrote: >My FreeBSD 5.3 system message logs are showing me this info, >Jun 12 14:53:48 gatekeeper kernel: pid 58059 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber >141313 on /usr: filesystem full >/dev/da0s1f 7529054 7381944 -455214 107% /usr Well, df shows /usr at 107% of capacity, so that explains "filesystem full". It's possible to have it over 100% because there is some reserve space set aside when you format, but you've used that up as well. Try "du -ks /usr*" to see where it's being used, and delete something. Maybe logs in /usr/local/var, mail in home dirs, or do you have Samba file shares under /usr ? -RW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 01:46:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252F16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: from smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27AC113C468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 57654 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 01:20:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.201?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@67.111.218.237 with plain) by smtp116.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 01:20:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: g9K.TIgVM1mSVT0m0b0Bk1evXF1oBn4mekgh_xILT.4.0PaSz2zXyDpk1QAwT0TvjmSAytb2GA-- Message-ID: <466F4642.8070001@george.lbl.gov> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:20:02 -0700 From: Jin Guojun User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: zh, zh-CN, en To: John Baldwin References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <466B4694.3060204@lbl.gov> <466B4B7E.4000006@lbl.gov> <200706121527.04274.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200706121527.04274.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:46:50 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 08:53:18 pm Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because anything equal to or below 1G options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size related. Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, following line causes the problem: options MAXDSIZ="(2097152U*1024)" Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen for some program? This is setting aside 2GB for malloc which leaves only 1GB for all of mmap and stack. You probably don't have enough address space to map your binary. This does not quite explain the problem. First of all, the MAXDSIZ is the maximum size for users to set their own datasize limit by 'limit' utility. If user do not set a high limit for datasize, it should not be a problem. The second aspect also counters this assumption, for machines that have less than or equal to 1 GB memory, and setting the MAXDISZ = the maximum memory size will not cause such problem. For example, if the physical memory size is 512 MB, and setting MAXDSIZ=(512*1024*1024) will not cause this problem. Or if the physical memory is 1GB, setting MAXDSIZ=(1024*1024*1024) will not cause the problem either. I will try to build a similar system on an AMD box with 2GB and more memory to see if this will be a problem. -Jin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:01:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F5316A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark_stout04@yahoo.com) Received: from web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.39.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CA9913C48C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark_stout04@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 57230 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2007 01:34:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=G87tnPmbOQnfE3Y/gh7pBQt0rQ3dcz/MtKMfSRj6LpmxR85Zikru1oE4TBZHTMolFtql074gh0X7WwtR2G9swzhvWZZLa9w5pqPoO4Oqd9ViE+3SvlTCI2LumtpHWx8ASfDE9lm3hNqHELMfFVHeyYhqh8+ufw+GeV4xlpyugjY= ; Message-ID: <20070613013440.57228.qmail@web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.218.94.141] by web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:34:40 PDT Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:34:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Stout To: illoai@gmail.com, mcs@vpm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:01:21 -0000 I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED and after a installworld and mergemaster its booting into 'mountroot>' and nothing I type mounts. This is a production machine so I'm in dire need of assistence. [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the > > /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on > > unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. > > What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything > > that explains why this would happen. > > A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and > symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > > I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new > kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not > need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And > support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? > > # These all failed as unknown options: > unknown option "MD5" > unknown option "LKM" > unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) > > > # Do not understand why these are fialing > config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > > # This failed as a syntax error > controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all you should need for those in your kernel config is: device ata device atadisk device atapicd (and obviously:) device eisa device pci Which are already part of GENERIC. /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist and buttons to push. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:06:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64216A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWHITE58146@roadrunner.com) Received: from mta1.adelphia.net (mta1.adelphia.net [68.168.78.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C1B13C4AD for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWHITE58146@roadrunner.com) Received: from princemicheal.natcky.rr.com ([76.177.49.57]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20070613010734.HVUZ16681.mta13.adelphia.net@princemicheal.natcky.rr.com> for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:07:37 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Adam Organization: n/a Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.21 (Win32) Subject: Yes i need to Ask A question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:54 -0000 I was wondering this this wireless networking card will work with FreeBsd - U.S. Robotics Wireless MAXg PC Card Ethernet Card, 802.11g, b. I needed to know because I am going to buy it next week. Thank You, please write back. -- Adam W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:12:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF316A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AEE13C489 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so84383pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CEdLoWglcL8lE9N1dx2U9zxHsGoLOekI1a4tmB7BziQoEHyNW8g4zCzWlB1QwB8gLs+Y5uKttcjvTSgpZJhBnUwIBiGHVsOSjeSp5LbRiJE3j4fmQjnAlVr6+u4DUK/xPCSQwjCxDTFmQ4XxYtel+Re1aLc4Qv5R5wzroi4MZY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MnMKxjEbDsyXr+7lf7O8hOcbRI8b/ikbapaa7wAlw/o+3O0XHlDoFR2dF5SCEwAz+I25WOJ0gNq4gGffn+3sbm+sx+K4GG4OWNKDtHDDnBNKSg/Q3Fm3lrCDcKhNprjRSRPdHDJkOSaeZcFKX+V4+L3Tos8/WdiOJgKyei3d+ro= Received: by 10.35.91.10 with SMTP id t10mr260581pyl.1181700768560; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.17.10? ( [66.41.41.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10sm302919pyh.2007.06.12.19.12.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466F529A.8090100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:12:42 -0500 From: Jack Barnett User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Stout References: <20070613013440.57228.qmail@web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070613013440.57228.qmail@web53712.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: illoai@gmail.com, mcs@vpm.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackbarnett@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:12:49 -0000 no idea, but maybe: boot /boot/kernel/kernel or boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel What is 'mountroot' - is that the boot loader or the kernel/system giving you that? try mounting your root drive! do a `df -k`, anything already mounted? oh! or try: fsck did it ask you to login? Mark Stout wrote: > I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED and after a installworld and mergemaster its booting into 'mountroot>' and nothing I type mounts. This is a production machine so I'm in dire need of assistence. > > [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: > On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > >>> Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the >>> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on >>> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. >>> What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything >>> that explains why this would happen. >>> >> A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and >> symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. >> >> I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new >> kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not >> need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And >> support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? >> >> # These all failed as unknown options: >> unknown option "MD5" >> unknown option "LKM" >> unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" >> unknown option "NSWAPDEV" >> unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" >> unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) >> >> >> # Do not understand why these are fialing >> config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown >> config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown >> config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown >> >> # This failed as a syntax error >> controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 >> >> > > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated > stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" > line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). > > IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all > you should need for those in your kernel config > is: > device ata > device atadisk > device atapicd > (and obviously:) > device eisa > device pci > Which are already part of GENERIC. > > /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. > Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES > and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist > and buttons to push. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:19:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C982E16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892FF13C44C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so86502pyi for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c8fvcxxRo+3fFD8kAL1cVHBdqRvpEUrUt5E22QoL0PBj5ewlN5PWaraofKEvmgVsazJwEV/9nwXliSksimPtMe3JAK2TWD5pdHyf16Mxc5GQ6Ey1tGoKtAG3XSPXPnjveovsWkQjtswUWm4SeuO6gsKHzMtteXLbznh1SWkTWRo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iGEN3NxHxsB2ZOBw6BTuPTTav4gNFVwSvGWvRTtWgMfdNRZsejSJfophc+3DDGsHa02G2jW9mt8MHC8Ntq9qNWmKWDd3MA+96xO7efItGxHich7n1uK9OgBFgcXfmkWhTj53iTYglxa8z/n4q6zc2s1dMecjqhM97ekKG0WmZws= Received: by 10.65.138.4 with SMTP id q4mr114986qbn.1181701179812; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.76.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706121919s60170cf6l7ed98e4e35fde9d9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:19:39 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: Adam , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: Subject: Re: Yes i need to Ask A question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:19:40 -0000 On 6/12/07, Adam wrote: > I was wondering this this wireless networking card will work with FreeBsd > - U.S. Robotics Wireless MAXg PC Card Ethernet Card, 802.11g, b. I needed > to know because I am going to buy it next week. Thank You, please write > back. > > -- > Adam W. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Sorta unrelated, but I've had a good experience with anything based off the Atheros chipset..netgear tends to use that chipset. Read the man page for 'ath'. I'm not sure about the card you're looking to buy, you could always resort to ndis if you had to. I'd use Google to help you buy your card, and there's a list around somewhere of wireless cards that work with FreeBSD... -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:36:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAD416A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdpf@academ.org) Received: from mx6.academ.org (mx6.academ.org [85.118.224.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC3F13C48C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdpf@academ.org) Received: from stronghold.academ.local (stronghold.academ.local [192.168.234.23]) (Authenticated sender: vgi@academ.org) by mx6.academ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5ECEBC9F; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:12:59 +0700 (NOVST) From: Vasily Ivanov Organization: Academ.org To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:13:52 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706111920x2e9e2d71ma2bcb3dd074daa60@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706130913.53526.freebsdpf@academ.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on mail.academ.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Ystatus: hits=-3.8 R529 R4010 R3466 R2286 R4708 __R3988 R4397 R3261 R2195 R4850 R208 R3260 R4232 __R4747 R3198 R668 R2026 R3496 R3497 __R4335 R3279 R2062 R3262 R2580 R3980 R3989 R4896 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Yversion: academ.org Cc: Subject: Re: how 2 address&port map outbound traffic to multiple/different IPs on a single intfc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:36:18 -0000 Hello. On 12 June 2007 09:20, snowcrash+freebsd wrote: [- snip -] > (2) from the POOLS discussion, 'simple' outbound NAT: > > nat on $ext_if from z.z.z.102 port 25 to any -> ($ext_if) > nat on $ext_if from z.z.z.102 port 25 to any -> ($ext_if) > > doesn't do it either - i dno't think -- as $ext_if picks up the > "primary IP" assigned via the pppoe startup, x.x.x.1. You can specify required IP explicitly, like nat on $ext_if from z.z.z.102 port 25 to any -> x.x.x.2 You don't even need aliases on interface (at least it works for my ethernet connection, dunno about pppoe). Just make sure your upstream routes traffic to your x.x.x.x/29 into your box. > > so, i think i'm in the right ballpark with *nat of some sort, but how > do i get this done correctly? > > cheers! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- wbr, Vasily http://www.academ.org mailto: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:37:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A76216A577 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark_stout04@yahoo.com) Received: from web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.37.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 223BB13C465 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark_stout04@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64279 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2007 02:37:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PfptdxTU8rs9Ymn3KLN1JcCa8kOfRznFc7w+TToxwjU1qsrYui6l5F9kJaUd46pvjnRuaVs9kqMA+9R1PM1JgDPulv6CAcVjpPsZnX5ihp+IvOXzZ4kUAuhzeRPu2cJzR+inadspOjxvCxlop0B3JeN8HYMKtjrVadirgsimHaM= ; Message-ID: <20070613023704.64277.qmail@web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.218.94.138] by web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:37:04 PDT Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:37:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Stout To: jackbarnett@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: illoai@gmail.com, mcs@vpm.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:37:05 -0000 I couldn't load da0s1a even though /dev/da0s1a is my root drive. Manually load my old kernel from the prompt worked. I believe the mountroot is during the boot load. I'm not anywhere near being able to do anything. I have no idea what the problem is. [jackbarnett@gmail.com] wrote: no idea, but maybe: boot /boot/kernel/kernel or boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel What is 'mountroot' - is that the boot loader or the kernel/system giving you that? try mounting your root drive! do a `df -k`, anything already mounted? oh! or try: fsck did it ask you to login? Mark Stout wrote: > I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED and after a installworld and mergemaster its booting into 'mountroot>' and nothing I type mounts. This is a production machine so I'm in dire need of assistence. > > [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: > On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > >>> Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the >>> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on >>> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. >>> What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything >>> that explains why this would happen. >>> >> A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and >> symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. >> >> I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new >> kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not >> need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And >> support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? >> >> # These all failed as unknown options: >> unknown option "MD5" >> unknown option "LKM" >> unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" >> unknown option "NSWAPDEV" >> unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" >> unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) >> >> >> # Do not understand why these are fialing >> config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown >> config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown >> config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown >> >> # This failed as a syntax error >> controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 >> >> > > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated > stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" > line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). > > IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all > you should need for those in your kernel config > is: > device ata > device atadisk > device atapicd > (and obviously:) > device eisa > device pci > Which are already part of GENERIC. > > /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. > Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES > and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist > and buttons to push. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:58:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED05C16A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEAE13C4B0 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5D2wIFS079440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:58:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id l5D2wGXT017437; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:58:16 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:58:16 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200706130258.l5D2wGXT017437@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com In-reply-to: <466EBC05.3020202@extracktor.com> (message from Foo JH on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:30:13 +0800) References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> <200706120949.l5C9nrPB088807@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <466EBC05.3020202@extracktor.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:58:33 -0000 > Can anyone confirm that Qmail/ inetd/ FreeBSD does some form of dns > lookup on it's SMTP? It most certainly does, that would be configurable, but you can confirm that by yourself: look at the full headers of the email you receive, you should see some headers saying something like: Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5CFXURR030909 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:33:34 +0700 (ICT) Now consider the top most of the Received-by headers, this top most one has been generated by your qmail server. Does it have an IP address associated to the the name of the sending machine (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])? If yes, it means qmail did some DNS resolving. bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 03:00:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D4916A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prometheusrj@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FA313C4BA for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prometheusrj@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so52698nzn for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mLGH27SgTjpETI8fzEK+kUet71diSKzJ8hXfZuvq1RUrrO5wIwyLXfzpUx8t+MfHYkI7p5U/AT9pyrMVYsOIzaZlFFy/JGfH3Quz7doTHxG3p6tPbndWAcXsdx9P6zYDaidqgroWIVYvvwym5RY5Ns39DkZE+dhi9mrvS3oc78g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FOQQ09WXR0HOl0oZZ8o9s2t20fDsSvj8jmf3nWfWB6la0QEoEXI9rTLfc1Tb6eg4yYVqoXPMqWOpvR49M4UO5Whdm8IjvUcGAxJxrr8qwKbaS4/R3ETeTXJfjXoDmOIuE7j3SXHlxFIe/FsVGIyfM1fVn9M37jrW3IFebYjkNkg= Received: by 10.65.43.5 with SMTP id v5mr168428qbj.1181703635610; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.91.10 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:00:35 -0300 From: "Pedro Pires" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to configure keyboard layout on OpenOffice.org-2.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:00:39 -0000 I'm having problems to find out how to change my keyboard layout while using OpenOffice.org-2.2.0. I use a portuguese (br) abnt keyboard. Anyone could help me? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 03:20:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073D716A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D233F13C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spap13@googlemail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so82659waf for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:20:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LMBmbZjTIvPyCrWE4j01fQk3gFtKG3hUmVQeqbXNpMyV983OxkGh4b3KRmGa5GKezjgUhWFfa1EKItDnOGfcV8AZHeTg6vnbdeiey/xCOYqS5czcAUWzlq7Dq1FupVAU+KzfCfao0S4/CpOHK56sOZFdaU/irF1Kv0jsqTAvONA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZKqUIURiMPp5TVCjXuCbbyZDr7+35n7LRHR4AFMRa3md3dXMZXQOguScg+H6V/R6TxFOOHHBbm8NwpDoD0uxNf5qkZNX6QHOJsTsp5XIqCPEHtBQVkgFEirp5Y6llidfgzmmtW39mJq6sONGrT5/bznVF8Z3o4GElsovim4YCW0= Received: by 10.115.74.1 with SMTP id b1mr157601wal.1181704823618; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.78.13 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:20:18 -0400 From: "Spiros Papadopoulos" To: "Mark Stout" In-Reply-To: <20070613023704.64277.qmail@web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070613023704.64277.qmail@web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd mailing list Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:20:24 -0000 Hi Mark, Some months ago i tried to upgrade my source from 5.2 to 6.1. I did "something" wrong and It took me 2 to 4 weeks to stabilize my system and to be honest i tried so many things that i am not sure what I did exactly and brought it back to normal. I remember re-building and re-installing the kernel and suddenly everything was working properly. I believe that in your case the problem was caused while using mergemaster... In general it is not recommended to update to a major version like this and the procedure is slightly different than when upgrading from a minor version. After what i read and since this is a production machine, i believe it is better that you take a (manual...?) back up of the configuration files (even copy & paste them on paper - if you cannot boot, mount the drive with a CD) and re-install 6.2clean.... :( You have to take the decision whether this will save you time or not, since after all these it gets confusing, you cannot really remember what you were doing (4 days ago) and you may cause even more problems or waste time if you continue.. It is even more difficult for us to understand what went wrong in your case... Ideally you could use a different machine (or hdd - temporarily) to do this and then if you want sit down quietly and play with the current one. Kind Regards On 12/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > I couldn't load da0s1a even though /dev/da0s1a is my root drive. Manually > load my old kernel from the prompt worked. > > I believe the mountroot is during the boot load. I'm not anywhere near > being able to do anything. > > I have no idea what the problem is. > > [jackbarnett@gmail.com] wrote: > > no idea, but maybe: > boot /boot/kernel/kernel > or > boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel > > What is 'mountroot' - is that the boot loader or the kernel/system > giving you that? > > try mounting your root drive! > > do a `df -k`, anything already mounted? > > oh! or try: > fsck > > did it ask you to login? > > > Mark Stout wrote: > > I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED and after a > installworld and mergemaster its booting into 'mountroot>' and nothing I > type mounts. This is a production machine so I'm in dire need of > assistence. > > > > [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: > > On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > >>> Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook > >>> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I > removed the > >>> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the > kernel its failing on > >>> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above > MD5, options LKM. > >>> What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I > can't find anything > >>> that explains why this would happen. > >>> > >> A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and > >> symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > >> > >> I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new > >> kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not > >> need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And > >> support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? > >> > >> # These all failed as unknown options: > >> unknown option "MD5" > >> unknown option "LKM" > >> unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > >> unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > >> unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > >> unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 > Securing FreeBSD) > >> > >> > >> # Do not understand why these are fialing > >> config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > >> config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > >> config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > >> > >> # This failed as a syntax error > >> controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > >> > >> > > > > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated > > stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" > > line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). > > > > IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all > > you should need for those in your kernel config > > is: > > device ata > > device atadisk > > device atapicd > > (and obviously:) > > device eisa > > device pci > > Which are already part of GENERIC. > > > > /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. > > Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES > > and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist > > and buttons to push. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Spiros P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 04:04:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD86516A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.extracktor.com (www.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E013C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: (qmail 51239 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 03:49:06 -0000 Received: from 62.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg (HELO ?192.168.1.110?) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@210.193.15.62) by www.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 03:49:06 -0000 Message-ID: <466F6CD8.8090201@extracktor.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:04:40 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <466CB2DF.30808@extracktor.com> <9ADFB3BA-F02E-458D-80C1-2F13EAC769EF@mac.com> <466E695E.8030300@extracktor.com> <200706120949.l5C9nrPB088807@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <466EBC05.3020202@extracktor.com> <200706130258.l5D2wGXT017437@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200706130258.l5D2wGXT017437@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shorten delay in sending mail to SMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:04:49 -0000 Thanks Nicole. This may end up as a qmail question now: is there a way to disable dns lookup for qmail then? Olivier Nicole wrote: >> Can anyone confirm that Qmail/ inetd/ FreeBSD does some form of dns >> lookup on it's SMTP? >> > > It most certainly does, that would be configurable, but you can > confirm that by yourself: look at the full headers of the email you > receive, you should see some headers saying something like: > > Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) > by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5CFXURR030909 > for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:33:34 +0700 (ICT) > > Now consider the top most of the Received-by headers, this top most > one has been generated by your qmail server. Does it have an IP > address associated to the the name of the sending machine > (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])? If yes, it means qmail did some DNS > resolving. > > bests, > > Olivier > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 04:35:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6890C16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1013C455 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so339289uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CYgMj9syACDK/aCk8e1rV4s9YhCKKUlyp/9zEpWcifW3W57/72PHSm1BaBGwqsj7b1ByYW40ZZhKjchZmyXpjdUqmC2lCX9nqWtTaDHSW10j3ddeWS7gGuPk6a5K6fdPWP9o4wyp5FHELx2pATmKyPwxbaPQcG3ykD2FaVyfPNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d5VM2KMr+K7jiOqehvbZqvIk7Ps1YqlQKKN8n8jeaTszL5VEp+18gxnvdwA6bNqpCAuWS6ah9KgklxN5Qixq+fG4iPijkFRtfVkdmHYsYd1bzj2VmwtaAA2QbH6TYRPfyPIiOSW95skGIUMNjMVgpn7/7x5wJ8fTR19eRDz0Uuo= Received: by 10.82.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr319923bud.1181709318388; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:35:18 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr In-Reply-To: <200706120726.l5C7QH2i024968@MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706120726.l5C7QH2i024968@MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:35:20 -0000 On 12/06/07, paranesti@ath.forthnet.gr wrote: > > > How can i do FreeBSD from RELEASE to RELEASE-security ? Thx man freebsd-update -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 05:10:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B73D16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE313C45E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id PAA24498; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:09:28 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:09:27 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Bob In-Reply-To: <20070612215825.6E92216A4C1@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:10:00 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 "Bob" wrote: > Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log > records. > To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get > requests to other URL's. > Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server from > servicing these bogus requests? > > 122-124-129-27.dynamic.hinet.net - - [04/May/2007:04:38:18 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 [..] > 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:39 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 > kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:44 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php > HTT > kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:45 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php > H [..] > r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:40 -0400] "\x04\x01\x1a\vE\x10\xac\"" 400 - "-" "-" > r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:50 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "- > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:21 -0400] "GET > http://www.internetsec.org/a > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:37 -0400] "\x04\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:52 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" What Chuck said about disabling|securing mod_proxy and PHP, for sure .. But in most cases you chopped off the most important information; the HTTP code indicating apache's response to the request. On those last two, 200 indicates apache served a page of 7036 bytes. If that's the served size of your home "/" page then you've little to worry about. 40x responses indicate refusal; page not found, permission denied etc. Here at least weekly I see such as: 220.137.74.222 - - [12/Jun/2007:02:07:08 +1000] "CONNECT msa-mx10.hinet.net:25 HTTP/1.0" 403 272 "-" "-" 403 = Permission denied. In this case, because I disallow 'no referrer' plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from non-local addresses, blocking heaps of rogue robots, but CONNECT requests don't work anyway in apache 1.3 in default configuration .. older logs show 405 responses to these. 222.141.50.175 - - [21/May/2007:23:46:01 +1000] "GET http://www.baidu.com/ HTTP/1.1" 200 3847 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT)" In this case, apache served (200 response) *my* home page (3847 bytes) on all such would-be proxy requests. Not a problem. > 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:38 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 FWIW, nearly every CONNECT request here for the last 2 years has been for or from some hinet.net host or other. They're well up in the top 10 spam sources too, so I won't see any mail from *@hinet.net complaining! Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 05:22:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA5716A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279A513C458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so346409uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jAe/BtLVZ6pMhwt4I5OrkJHVJAc9ymaKPxp3pgQ5/hZ0KfI/u5ooOj5Hcb4REbVAQr6y9Q9QkiULyCKZEyoUJNP5WB/sS7uJaKjPcpnj/XdYkA5lwX18OzND/kI2RjXjr74Q3wtIMtYZ8EXDilupEz2mBn/VMEWCheqAlppj0FY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RAuVBlm5gn360beo4piS9NZSSzMHU0Z5p61vmjk3yNiSlcB9b2uWBOX2AcL/w+zjxnjIG+XLV4GM8DpT6Bcycu7h3Ts5WFTNRcvyCDdfp2IOVgAZmIWpo4jzbrrjfEkbIUEuJD+q/o7jMo4qjUMzb0z9I6R2o68K3tFkReypWhY= Received: by 10.82.158.12 with SMTP id g12mr326823bue.1181712131985; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:22:11 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Andrew Falanga" In-Reply-To: <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:22:13 -0000 On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > > If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a > > memory problem. See e.g. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ > > > > Roland > > Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a > work around? > > http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html > > This machine I'm having problems with is an AMD K6. A K6-700? Without doing too much flabulous research, I believe the K6 stopped at 300MHz. A 700 would be a K6-III, which would not have the 32MB problem. Flaky and heat-sen- sitive they are indeed. And there is a lot of junk 133 memory out there too. Based on my limited experience, about 60% of the time you can run 100MHz memory at 133MHz. If not you may have to rejumper your bus-speed to 100. If you are further unlucky the board won't have a 7:1 multiplier and you'll be stuck underclocking pretty seriously. This might actually make the machine useable, though. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 05:24:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128A16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390C613C489 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A76B46D4C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:24:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51376-05-2 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:24:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297C6B47101 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:23:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB615C7AD for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:23:13 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:23:12 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <403EC02DF722823DF06ECF9E@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: iLO or DRAC like interface ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:24:26 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone know of anything non-HP / Dell that would give me the same functionality as iLO/DRAC? I don't want something sticking out the back, either a card (or motherboard?) that has an ethernet slot in it that would give me full remote console / bios / etc access to the machine ... thanks .. - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGb39A4QvfyHIvDvMRAlHAAKCK/44nMULGQs1qV9VFcMgz0WXNPACg5Td5 m+6WX0dBYkudLjh+i8FpQtQ= =/QlK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 06:22:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357316A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70FC13C468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so355582uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kT9dZ8QaF4i111C/9HknFsiPgi+VtWcKS2p2YrRrxUT/M6i0vSICbohou1+TQt5fd1wj0TqfRllhS7OXLECInRs4nyXt60wSdSubuqPE+nHJafm8kxZ3ko1uEFfDuHKi0zPMcSLdmCZXTSUBCHNNVkcNIl8be9DF+4Oo+tqqugE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XgxVwCdpR8OeK1EEYPdAE3h3OexdnrquyYP44ahlEp9bisgzF55lkTgpvUC+3qIKK2S7kaVY/4JVuXaRHEk6OUWvUATstzzYdq8B9jxepDn7KMd5YjB88r722IkLKohdE0X7yseAzCjszmDggbTQSb7BItpe+T9uQYCGRP6IVXI= Received: by 10.78.156.6 with SMTP id d6mr74411hue.1181715746300; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.194.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:22:26 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200706121349.l5CDnLDN096045@chez.mckusick.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706121349.l5CDnLDN096045@chez.mckusick.com> Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:28 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kirk McKusick Date: 12-Jun-2007 16:49 Subject: Re: Fwd: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: Vlad GURDIGA Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway , Enrique Ayesta Perojo I believe that there are some limitations on booting FreeBSD from filesystems bigger than 2Tb, but I know of no limitations on building non-root filesystems bigger than 2Tb. I have copied Kris Kennaway and the FreeBSD filesystem mailing list in the hope that someone can give a more precise answer than me. Kirk McKusick ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:16:45 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: mckusick@mckusick.com Subject: Fwd: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-ASK-Info: Message Queued (2007/06/11 07:17:40) X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by User (2007/06/11 07:20:20) Hello, Wikipedia says that you contributed to development of FFS and I thought you might give a sure answer to a question about it. These days I saw a question on freebsd-questions mailing list that was left without a solution till now [see below]. Is there any chance that FFS can be extended to handle larger disks? Best regards. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Enrique Ayesta Perojo Date: 11-Jun-2007 11:13 Subject: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hello I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.2 on a HP DL320s. This server has a P400 RAID controller with 12 SATA disk drives attached to it. The RAID controller is supported in FreeBSD through the ciss driver. The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the disk). If the array is smaller than 2 Terabytes then there is no problem, the controller detects the disk and i can install FreeBSD on it. I have tried with i386 and AMD64 versions (the server has a Xeon processor supported by AMD64) Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 TB? Thanks _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 06:22:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38AE16A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6911C13C480 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so355582uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BOGKypVKdYdFp2LQ4Uz0B90sGZjiCeBoLnKCxagh5NoYSiG08rNWwxug/3V/paOwCKgSZGtJQXYiTa5wCB5EsROERoWhuwlJQhw14/HHlvSF3xJwsgiqT+09algs0m7gTzWzp2mJtmxTjxTdck0qeaT89cPA4Iz5coLPxSiMxVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CeVlLeuz/xHiJtmD7xv0s7ef9fUntB5es3Ga4cVH3n3vYIO3QXl6x4D9NHG8c4VZniEXiX4fy1uhp+dXUuz5DQ+QbUjpWSfdeSrxok+NDxoExUvf+o9DbIGZBm4kTa+KFILfYwBw9hVRzY/4YHIrBH+veu16CvNe2JMmpIlTX2Y= Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr72149hug.1181715761939; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.194.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:22:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:22:41 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706121349.l5CDnLDN096045@chez.mckusick.com> Subject: Fwd: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:22:42 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Francisco Reyes Date: 13-Jun-2007 03:42 Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD on large disk >2TB To: gurdiga@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Enrique Ayesta Perojo , Kris Kennaway There is a simmilar thread related to filesystems greater than 2TB. The subject is: Filesystems larger than 2TB I started the thread and from what I can gather you can not have a filesystem greater than 2TB on your boot device. Also you can not use sysinstall to create the partition if it is greater than 2TB. > The problem happens when i try to use a RAID larger in size to 2 Terabyte, > then the install program freezes and the machine reboots (it cannot find the > disk). Split your drives. Make a RAID1 with 2 drives and install / /usr /var /tmp swap The second raid with the rest of the drives you should be able to create the partition manually, not from sysinstall. > Any clue on how to solve it? FreeBSD can't be installed on disks larger than 2 > TB? As far as I can tell no. As for creating the partition after you have a working system there were two methods mentioned. Was was using newfs against the raw device like newfs -s /dev/da0s2 The other one involves something called GPT, but seems like it is a more difficult method and it also seems like there is ongoing discussion about GPT. I also think, but am not sure, that it will be easier to have partitions greater than 2TB when ZFS is incorporated into the OS. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 06:28:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822C216A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6754F13C45E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HyMLC-0008LQ-JM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:28:26 -0700 Message-ID: <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:28:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Ofloo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: bulk@ofloo.net References: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: 6to4 IPv6 problems FreeBSD 6.2 p4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:28:27 -0000 Ofloo wrote: > > I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of > bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in > trouble. > > May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for > 192.88.99.1 > May 28 19:51:22 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for > 192.88.99.1 > May 28 20:06:15 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for > 192.88.99.1 > May 28 20:09:02 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for > 192.88.99.1 > > The default route does exist though: > > narf# netstat -rn -f inet6 | grep default > default 2002:c058:6301:: UGS > stf0 > narf# > > when this happens it takes about 10 mins and my ssh IPv6 ssh session is > closed, after keeping this up for longer the server crashes, .. any > suggestions ? > I noticed that when I'm compiling, and a lot of data comes on my remote shell screen (which is connected through ipv6) that the connection is terminated, can any one verrify !? 6to4 has prefixlen 16 so it is within the broadcast and it's not using the routes at all when it disconnects, though this doesn't result into a crash, of the server. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11093482 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 06:47:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4BF16A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:47:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AA213C46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so359860uge for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:47:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ePrd194rV+VByL0I/umQ2ejDAjWDllBdX5cb5QXJ69MWEzehqumV5NO3MVGakyUaDFbl44J+lWRpr5iruJEanKyqFjbbd2kxDsVBiAZp3iGe0VBSgHvbFlAcOeWZbFk0cOcsyOaBxazanOj60K6kzrSYexskKgrj7KDogn1kMRA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h9cAQPNpxP/sEpKU2jetCrNrddGTyXricX9gvKLKAZA73S/cbgrpoDM0dxnfFfa4KFvoS4W4XJl8JExEPzxB+xIqRpZ6b11gy5DriFHpGo9sB1MLx7pXMa1+qj4QUxt2EGHwUQ9oDLDS9u66rEMjCBQPGq8vQxPRDwXqcwPvkfk= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr403418buc.1181717255742; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:47:35 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> Subject: Re: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:47:39 -0000 On 12/06/07, Chad Perrin wrote: > No matter what I try to look up with ri (the Ruby information utility > that is used to look up stuff about classes, methods, et cetera, from the > command line), it returns the same result: > > > ri Time.strftime > Nothing known about Time.strftime > > I don't see anything in /usr/ports/lang that seems to relate to the > matter of ensuring ri has a database of information to share. What am I > missing? How can I get ri working properly on FreeBSD? On a hunch I typed "ri -h" . . . and another hunch made me type "ri -c" . . . . . . Well, crap. rdoc wants something I can't think to give it. Hopefully this will start making sense. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 06:55:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A78716A480 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD39A13C468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id QAA26792; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:55:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:55:37 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Andrew Falanga In-Reply-To: <20070612171902.ABA9616A4A5@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:55:48 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga wrote: > a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a > different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted > and tried the install again with the same result. At the same place? If so, I'd tend to suspect memory rather than cpu. > I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. I've > never seen a FreeBSD, OpenBSD or Linux (for that matter) hard hang on > program compilation apart from hardware problems. Also of particular [..] > System configuration is as follows: > > AMD K6 700mHz > 256mb RAM (PC 133) > 13gb HDD 700MHz? Please show us the line from your /var/run/dmesg.boot showing the exact cpu and clock. This will also indicate features & stepping that should pinpoint the cpu model. From one 4.10 system hereabouts: CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (400.91-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x58c Stepping = 12 Features=0x8021bf AMD Features=0x80000800 real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) That's a K6-2, though it doesn't say so there. From memory, the fastest ever K6-2 was ~550MHz, but people did tend to wildly overclock them .. As others have mentioned, K6s don't like running too hot. I nurse two, the 400 and a 450MHz box that run forever as long as the cpu fan is ok. And when they do overheat, they'll freeze, but I've never actually seen one damaged (as opposed to a couple of fried P3s of similar vintage) If you really are running it at 700MHz (at what bus speed setting?) then I'd treat it to a new heat sink with fresh thermal paste and a BIG fan. And sure it's best to run matched-speed memory. Your BIOS probably lets you play with wait states and such, but the basic PCI bus speed might be something weird if you've managed to crank the cpu up to 700MHz .. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 07:06:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DB516A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BD013C484 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so106516mue for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fc4h5sHMq5oSTmxPOSDi5sYcie9NRpQHS9e7RFNlghkQyxPelHMPjMyOX06Mmuf2GxEZ05bM1SCGOp9Wdwkpi1V0kz0c+SRUm/mYsG9NPPAhJEX6PsTX4hsuIxftfTgA5LBXp6ohuOshSFYU8uEczSmGqcAXd5hdMIH9A4GuLBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WQLe4VWvgH15+aLF+xCTWPF/FU1nC4ctzAI/awI2YNtC7hKf4HhlkqpSFW2Fgo6kSN4yEbqwayyERFQ9rZjgJfVr8TeYyRRBj8TDNzIbaDXrPkJIwF8b1xouoTKAPp81rKyY3KH2DBobpDzwX5xJuOWAn0d8facS9u6nynpa+A8= Received: by 10.82.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr449973bub.1181718373243; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:06:08 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> Subject: Re: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:06:15 -0000 On 13/06/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 12/06/07, Chad Perrin wrote: > > No matter what I try to look up with ri (the Ruby information utility > > that is used to look up stuff about classes, methods, et cetera, from the > > command line), it returns the same result: > > > > > ri Time.strftime > > Nothing known about Time.strftime > > > > I don't see anything in /usr/ports/lang that seems to relate to the > > matter of ensuring ri has a database of information to share. What am I > > missing? How can I get ri working properly on FreeBSD? > > On a hunch I typed "ri -h" . . . > and another hunch made me type "ri -c" . . . > > . . . > Well, crap. rdoc wants something I can't think > to give it. > Hopefully this will start making sense. > Hello, self. Also, hello, Chad! % tar jxvf /ports/distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.bz2 % sudo rdoc --ri -R -U ruby-1.8.6/ seems to be producing output. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 08:02:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC06916A46B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA23B13C480 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 51451 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 07:59:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 07:59:09 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5D82lD0020395 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:02:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5D82kOg020394 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:02:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:02:46 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070613080246.GA20321@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:02:49 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:06:08AM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 13/06/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > >On 12/06/07, Chad Perrin wrote: > >> No matter what I try to look up with ri (the Ruby information utility > >> that is used to look up stuff about classes, methods, et cetera, from the > >> command line), it returns the same result: > >> > >> > ri Time.strftime > >> Nothing known about Time.strftime > >> > >> I don't see anything in /usr/ports/lang that seems to relate to the > >> matter of ensuring ri has a database of information to share. What am I > >> missing? How can I get ri working properly on FreeBSD? > > > >On a hunch I typed "ri -h" . . . > >and another hunch made me type "ri -c" . . . > > > >. . . > >Well, crap. rdoc wants something I can't think > >to give it. > >Hopefully this will start making sense. > > > > Hello, self. Also, hello, Chad! > > % tar jxvf /ports/distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.bz2 > % sudo rdoc --ri -R -U ruby-1.8.6/ > > seems to be producing output. Interesting. Any idea why this isn't more obvious? I guess my mistake was in not trying "ri -c". I'm also not terribly clear on how I'd have guessed at: /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.bz2 . . . without any easily discoverable guidance. Thanks much! It's working now. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2); From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 08:23:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D5B16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s22.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s22.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2647F13C457 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.112]) by bay0-omc3-s22.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:23:34 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:23:33 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:32 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2007 08:23:33.0767 (UTC) FILETIME=[21D43970:01C7AD94] Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:23:34 -0000 Hi everybody , I had a intel p4 box with FreeBSD-6.1 Os with Gnome 2.18. installed and , this desktop working fine for last 2 months . Mean while I tried to install OpenOffice from ports collection for this box , but it is asking for an upgrade of Xorg libraries , so I followed the /usr/ports/UPDATING procedure line by line ,, every thing went fine at the stage where I reached # portupgrade -aP ( while runnig this command about an hour or more ) ther HAPPENED a power failure , after this the m/c restarted and the Desktop environment lost for ever , Its asking for command login without Desktop GUI login , ther is an error message its showing gdm_server_spawn : Xserver not found : /usr/X11R6/bin/X : 0 -audit /var/gdm/: 0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt9 Failed to start X server several times in a short time period , disabling display:0 I tried to continue the portupgrade -aP command again but its showing errors , Stale dependency : at-spi-1.18.1_1 ----> xmlcatmgr-2.2 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix , or specify -0 to force asking pkgdb -F to run # pkgdb -F I executed but its showing some Duplicated origin : multimedia/gstreamer -gstreamer-0.10.12 gstreamer80-0.8.12_2 Unregister any of them ?[no] I enter no for 3/4 times for some duplicate origins Then it asking for Stale dependency at-spi-1.18.1_1 -->xmlcatmgr-2.2 (textproc/xmlcatmgr) : ........................ ............................ Install stale dependency ?[yes] y but its failed showing that stop in /usr/ports/textproc/xmlcatmgr (I tried to to deinstall and make reinstall textproc/xmlcatmgr many times it also failed all the times ) Here I requesting anyone of you to help me to 1 provide the method to retrive the Desktop environment ? OR 2 Other wise how I can remove all the the things related to xserver (so that I have to install the Gnome 2.18 again as I did was portinstall /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 ) I can do startx command as root and it starts the xwindows in my desktop , But I cant get the Gnome environment thanks in advance Dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Spice up your IM conversations. New, colorful and animated emoticons. Get chatting! http://server1.msn.co.in/SP05/emoticons/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 08:25:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F3C16A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc3-s26.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s26.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B8313C4BB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhaneshkk@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([65.55.132.107]) by bay0-omc3-s26.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:25:01 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:25:00 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 65.55.132.123 by by127fd.bay127.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:24:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.129.255.178] X-Originating-Email: [dhaneshkk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dhaneshkk@hotmail.com From: "dhaneshk k" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:24:56 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2007 08:25:00.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[55BF8B90:01C7AD94] Subject: Gnome desktop crash recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:25:01 -0000 Hi everybody , This is Dhanesh , I m a newbe to FreeBsd , I had a intel p4 box with FreeBSD-6.1 Os with Gnome 2.18. installed and , this desktop working fine for last 2 months . Mean while I tried to install OpenOffice from ports collection for this box , but it is asking for an upgrade of Xorg libraries , so I followed the /usr/ports/UPDATING procedure line by line ,, every thing went fine at the stage where I reached # portupgrade -aP ( while runnig this command about an hour or more ) ther HAPPENED a power failure , after this the m/c restarted and the Desktop environment lost for ever , Its asking for command login without Desktop GUI login , ther is an error message its showing gdm_server_spawn : Xserver not found : /usr/X11R6/bin/X : 0 -audit /var/gdm/: 0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt9 Failed to start X server several times in a short time period , disabling display:0 I tried to continue the portupgrade -aP command again but its showing errors , Stale dependency : at-spi-1.18.1_1 ----> xmlcatmgr-2.2 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix , or specify -0 to force asking pkgdb -F to run # pkgdb -F I executed but its showing some Duplicated origin : multimedia/gstreamer -gstreamer-0.10.12 gstreamer80-0.8.12_2 Unregister any of them ?[no] I enter no for 3/4 times for some duplicate origins Then it asking for Stale dependency at-spi-1.18.1_1 -->xmlcatmgr-2.2 (textproc/xmlcatmgr) : ........................ ............................ Install stale dependency ?[yes] y but its failed showing that stop in /usr/ports/textproc/xmlcatmgr (I tried to to deinstall and make reinstall textproc/xmlcatmgr many times it also failed all the times ) Here I requesting anyone of you to help me to 1 provide the method to retrive the Desktop environment ? OR 2 Other wise how I can remove all the the things related to xserver (so that I have to install the Gnome 2.18 again as I did was portinstall /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 ) thanks in advance Dhanesh _________________________________________________________________ Get Married in 2007. Join Shaadi.com FREE! http://www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=mhottag From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 09:07:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3B916A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EF813C484 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so133169mue for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gVVH/17hr6vQpzXe+N9tXJS02ky/m+BnTsGAf7Oql1kIoZ9tIGIPDoOz6urDPQ3lPLrJRNQbKf0RNAERs9gnpJ67o7+UojvPUVpwQus/zwMTConTlLCZLpFjWRXXyDHDWt1hiS8+1e7cTYrjhadW9zSOwU+fcCUYdOoJ2fCmkZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fdPs9730oMMgiy1geVl0DEEpKCJLgBemldsBWpR7DVnNgXRKO+ihvm4ICj2OxQ2iPBn/Zjc1BSsWnEqs07iYubNp9LQXAbPR+bqDeO7lS6cpUES8WtokpQH4LcO9tGNv33gNIlB6tHyzx3/L14vL7Z0+1QHu+b9zMqkHRyFtuw8= Received: by 10.82.162.14 with SMTP id k14mr661761bue.1181725619221; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.158.11 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14989d6e0706130206p176823d9o8351bd676d198177@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:06:59 +0200 From: "Christian Walther" To: Adam In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yes i need to Ask A question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:07:01 -0000 On 13/06/07, Adam wrote: > I was wondering this this wireless networking card will work with FreeBsd > - U.S. Robotics Wireless MAXg PC Card Ethernet Card, 802.11g, b. I needed > to know because I am going to buy it next week. Thank You, please write > back. > IMO having a specific card supported is kind of a problem, because manufacturers tend to change chip revisions pretty fast, and there are some subtle difference between these revisions that can render the card useless - even if the driver supports the chipset. So make sure you find out what the card is actually based on (atheros, ral, etc.) and look up the manpage for the driver. Find the card and check the revision. If your revision is newer than the latest mentioned one, make sure that you can return the card. Or: Take your laptop with you. I did it when I purchased my D-Link DWL-650 from a big discounter. I loaded all available WLAN drivers into memory (gave a nice for-loop and the laptop lots to do). Afterwards the salespersons handed me one board after the other and I checked the console/syslog wether the board was recognised as a WLAN device. It was great: I figured I could go with a ral-based card, but it turned out to be unstable. Next try (yes, I went there again and we did the procedure all over again) I found the card mentioned above. And I'm really happy with it. It's stable, and the connection quality is really good. On a side note: Having a FreeBSD based Laptop with you in a store where people know only about Windows is an experience one should have. They need their time to get used to the idea that there are other Operating Systems as Windows. And that these don't need graphics to work. And that there are people out there that can work with a computer without graphics... ;-D HTH Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 09:25:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A06B16A482 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0393C13C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so387851uge for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PoYwUXEyx1s9VSCtLofF1N4wOuisq9yLSFmX1XfnBQ8kV6VHTmR54WrVD5y5BaSmBrWUdtMqJmJ45yxUZMZ5gwx49gsR2RX0VgEIToS5l11lFg1iIGjbdTReiLEfGEoU/FzUWd5+7r1sJvH+Crtbel1+qqfEUiJDp6EdTVowDx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AbViCoQfDqUOwJENd6+YZGFxSANdHZ/tbn0ZCJ2oVvw64dqJ7qrWVrogdF4rPpvQj8CxvJlesuBqpfDSbNE4EoyJ2/UmBFv0mUYDEw9ZrSiDzOECwQLncalD/0zplFm42A6fzj9DZVkUToM6Wsnh79mVmrNB15x8RPVC54r3R0c= Received: by 10.82.112.16 with SMTP id k16mr689015buc.1181726747408; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.158.11 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14989d6e0706130225j52a883a0rd772e7154ce3d470@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:25:47 +0200 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <200706121851.57408.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706121851.57408.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde@mail.kde.org Subject: Re: cannot select arts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:25:49 -0000 On 13/06/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > cc: freebsd-questions: > [...] > is there somewhere in kde that i can specify that i want arts to be an > available option to multimedia apps? Applications need to be built with arts-Support, so I guess that this is missing on your second box. cd to a directory of one of the ports in question, and do a make config to check wether arts-support is available and selected, or not. HTH Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 09:30:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7BD16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D72313C455 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so388697uge for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr694712bub.1181727024470; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? ( [217.196.247.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35sm2475535nfu.2007.06.13.02.30.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466FB927.70207@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:30:15 +0100 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <14989d6e0706130206p176823d9o8351bd676d198177@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0706130206p176823d9o8351bd676d198177@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Yes i need to Ask A question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:30:26 -0000 Christian Walther wrote: ....... > On a side note: Having a FreeBSD based Laptop with you in a store > where people know only about Windows is an experience one should have. > They need their time to get used to the idea that there are other > Operating Systems as Windows. And that these don't need graphics to > work. And that there are people out there that can work with a > computer without graphics... ;-D ....... here in the UK you'd be lucky to be allowed to try even one card in your own machine. Only reason I bought an Acer is that someone else had already managed to get most of the kinks ironed out (and had written about it). Unfortunately improvements in FreeBSD have taken me backwards in terms of understanding over the last year. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 10:52:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39616A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6595F13C4BB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:05 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5DAq8kX039131 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from m.apitz@oclcpica.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to m.apitz@oclcpica.org using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:08 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613105208.GA38877@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2007 10:52:05.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[E17CEC40:01C7ADA8] Subject: open source X11 capture/playback tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:52:12 -0000 Hello, Is there some Open Source X11 capture/playback tool for testing X11 applications by collecting the XEvents in a file, changing them and re-playing the XEvents? Thx in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ OCLC PICA GmbH, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christine Magin-Weeger, Norbert Weinberger Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhaching, HRB Muenchen: 113261 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 11:11:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506F316A475 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C8113C46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so405410uge for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:11:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JPEnBRfzVCeK/rH2ADw28EWSP42937trpHIWhmi7Fy+wmcEsyfLX3QPy7xxBa99xMhfDN1Ce6M7hPPhX6Eessx+tA5pKe1qEiIFlMAUElmSkG8olaB/Lg5H5WXxsdpVXpJ6dU2mPnkMiVyusEbYZDxAwV93iKnYHn6AI1Xq34lI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hQ/drJj5i192/w94PpSIqmVN9tz3C7TZO5evNVQWeIaqqjVu3RgwM9hopppqsN0ifTdxBLjm4UHP/H2sLT8dz4wV5k/z7om2mD/PYJvdEqRolybCnVmzloENe4HmxjuNmbfjJ/hBOfucx0Cz+9gEkKXH1DFDnSh19uGTb/+3m3I= Received: by 10.82.127.14 with SMTP id z14mr865381buc.1181733072428; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.158.11 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14989d6e0706130411m1deef2bye56fbdcdf28baee2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:11:12 +0200 From: "Christian Walther" To: "dhaneshk k" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome desktop crash recovery X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:11:14 -0000 On 13/06/07, dhaneshk k wrote: > > Hi everybody , > [...] > I tried to continue the portupgrade -aP command again but its showing > errors , > Stale dependency : at-spi-1.18.1_1 ----> xmlcatmgr-2.2 -- manually run > 'pkgdb -F' to fix , or specify -0 to force > > asking pkgdb -F to run > > # pkgdb -F I executed but its showing some > > > Duplicated origin : multimedia/gstreamer -gstreamer-0.10.12 > gstreamer80-0.8.12_2 > Unregister any of them ?[no] > > I enter no for 3/4 times for some duplicate origins > > > Then it asking for Stale dependency at-spi-1.18.1_1 -->xmlcatmgr-2.2 > (textproc/xmlcatmgr) : > ........................ > ............................ > > Install stale dependency ?[yes] y > but its failed showing that stop in /usr/ports/textproc/xmlcatmgr > (I tried to to deinstall and make reinstall textproc/xmlcatmgr many > times it also failed all the times ) > > Here I requesting anyone of you to help me to > > 1 provide the method to retrive the Desktop environment ? OR > > 2 Other wise how I can remove all the the things related to xserver (so > that I have to install the Gnome 2.18 again as I did was portinstall > /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 ) > I got stuck with gstreamer during my xorg upgrade, too, and I decided to remove everything related to gstreamer, including the applications that depend on it (vlc, mplayer...). Makes it easier, IMO. To figure out what happens to your xmlcatmgr port you should provide the exact output, that means the error messages. HTH Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 11:53:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7606416A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sasha-privat@newmail.ru) Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (flock1.newmail.ru [82.204.219.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0070413C45B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sasha-privat@newmail.ru) Received: (qmail 13108 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 11:46:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.35?) (sasha-privat@newmail.ru@217.198.133.125) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 11:46:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:45:39 +0300 From: Alexander Gudimov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.85.03) Professional Organization: Compy X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Question about use CPU Intel Xeon 5150 with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Gudimov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:53:13 -0000 Hello, questions. Please help me. What version of FreeBSD will prefer use on system with CPU Intel Xeon 5150 ? Main problem with choice: i386 or amd64 platforms. -- With best regards, Alexander mailto:sasha-privat@newmail.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 12:06:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC916A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sasha-privat@newmail.ru) Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (flock1.newmail.ru [82.204.219.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52DEB13C4AD for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sasha-privat@newmail.ru) Received: (qmail 3261 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 11:39:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.35?) (sasha-privat@newmail.ru@217.198.133.125) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 11:39:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:38:40 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?wOvl6vHg7eTwIMPz5Ojs7uI=?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.85.03) Professional Organization: Compy X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <656930427.20070613143840@newmail.ru> To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Question about use CPU Intel Xeon 5150 with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?wOvl6vHg7eTwIMPz5Ojs7uI=?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:06:12 -0000 Hello, questions. -- With best regards, Alexander mailto:sasha-privat@newmail.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 12:12:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3333C16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CCD13C45D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so292288pyi for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:12:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=n9kXk0/mZajWwDiElqODHQ9NM7GumY3ymQCLwRgcIU6yWlV3n/L1Gx6V1s5LtYYXr++a2HF81L4vVszWDGQEF/VvJp3it6PHTdg4T3TuIxD5HAZdzz/CSrQuTsCnZITQX3KblYK4eWzd4zOvMmUGqNSdlgSD+lhwkmhhZwNgu6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=cDzUKWuBvLzA+r7AsnG+vyRky0SB/ZvTzgzLgYBGJA554xxhx8A081diB+QSqXnDA38Xv/NHZatbeibnAR3KZrG48URVPO8nzF0wagXoBLhQRE5QboVokoTkE9xN5C5GERpiM6FdmIPrIxx3Bq5tqW1orACU2RyyL1Kp6YedeLw= Received: by 10.65.103.14 with SMTP id f14mr920457qbm.1181736764401; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.47.13 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:12:44 -0400 From: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: laptop video output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:12:47 -0000 hi, (hope this is in right forum) I want to buy a laptop, but dont know if fbsd support video output so i can use to do presentation. Thank you!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 12:30:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC84716A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5391513C45E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wizlayer@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so130713wra for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:30:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SosbElxR26a0osBGomTZCpAYzX6z8Bv1ZA0IdEbEcvMvUSg/XQns2iFnhiq9NlKpxt4xs/aQyjyC5hFGjTppD+AB5JVWcD7COSoInHemzxCXOFDRNDfGhAYwKbYzc+3BU7Ukb3oNTcrhDv5A9Pf6C7zpqVrABxEOBdXQJWrulIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=j1q9R5XUfdspSGdf0yRcVbMQhh21Hjx3NE7vZYKUUVicI01uT1NOOeQ34TQt5FHzvc988YpX16sK3Im1eaW/NR0RcY8r31DxXAfTdl+IIRcMwoUsgyX3tOg4WGu4t9fGKGcalcd3Vnl3CwTGM8bJra9XbSWtVG6IlmyKYfeDo4c= Received: by 10.100.91.6 with SMTP id o6mr327747anb.1181737800425; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.133.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3eacb91a0706130530n4e158885sd7336ba9bfce8ac0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:30:00 -0400 From: wizlayer To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: laptop video output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:03 -0000 On 6/13/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > > hi, > (hope this is in right forum) I want to buy a laptop, but dont know if > fbsd support video output so i can use to do presentation. Thank you!! > > TFC > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Check out the following link: http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/ That should give you an idea. :) WizLayer -- It's always better with a BSD... Learn more at http://www.bsd.org. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 12:30:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4354616A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C92913C480 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D9751937 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:30:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:30:35 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613133035.3c543d12@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> <200706121249.53906.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <68FAFDB9-DDCA-4A88-B1EA-26882AD3893F@mac.com> <466F1E9D.7070803@locolomo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:30:40 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:13:44 -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Make sure you've set your MTU for that interface down to 1492 if you > are using PPPoE. I don't thinks that's needed, my tun0 interface MTU is set to 1492 even though I've not configured it anywhere. AFAIK it's set automatically based on negotiation with the ppp peer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 12:38:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BC316A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7709913C4BE for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so42258anc for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sHhBzszScog9spD3D1QzPbK3XJQ27EmAUxTOxLttQL8MrzD4DY3BfI3a+39FdXkyuVcPr5DducegTEGKPcUZuAgFuo5Zx+jMUMJVnodC0lZPfPrmgdEuThDy9oss88jipb8+rd1ZzI7kJr0jst35hX/HFmViGEGX1+RKWxNPM+8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hAtj9Gt/vTSne0C4uGXK+5WLx9Yf5jACeYd8WvzzePJRNu5VL8seDzk0NNUKDWgnV7bjIHsyTs3t6Lt1WHma3cY+QhoR2Fdon0jAqT123bacJ+ZRzXcsWRYCeJakSFfCAwwLJpa7Ueohy41jq6DaeG0Zd4lx0GshfCLJIsT7yjs= Received: by 10.100.251.9 with SMTP id y9mr278291anh.1181736570557; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.9.14 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499c70c0706130509n1bc40b40r5839d931a2b582e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:09:30 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Alexander Gudimov" , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> Cc: Subject: Re: Question about use CPU Intel Xeon 5150 with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:19 -0000 If you are looking for performance, and amazing speed go for 7.0 AMD64 with SCHED_ULE. On 6/13/07, Alexander Gudimov wrote: > Hello, questions. > > Please help me. What version of FreeBSD will prefer use on system with > CPU Intel Xeon 5150 ? Main problem with choice: i386 or amd64 > platforms. > > -- > With best regards, > Alexander mailto:sasha-privat@newmail.ru > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:00:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8B016A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F27D13C45D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA493A0689; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:00:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <466FEA77.8070105@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:00:39 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz References: <20070613105208.GA38877@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20070613105208.GA38877@rebelion.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: open source X11 capture/playback tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:00:43 -0000 Written by Matthias Apitz on 06/13/07 05:52>> > Hello, > > Is there some Open Source X11 capture/playback tool for testing > X11 applications by collecting the XEvents in a file, changing them > and re-playing the XEvents? Thx in advance > > matthias A quick look at the ports tree reveals this candidate: Port: xnee-2.05 Path: /usr/ports/x11/xnee Info: X events recorder and player From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:02:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A46C16A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2555313C46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BCA51946; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:02:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:02:15 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613140215.27c8c64f@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> References: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Gudimov Subject: Re: Question about use CPU Intel Xeon 5150 with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:02:21 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:45:39 +0300 Alexander Gudimov wrote: > Hello, questions. > > Please help me. What version of FreeBSD will prefer use on system with > CPU Intel Xeon 5150 ? Main problem with choice: i386 or amd64 > platforms. If it's for a server, or you have a compelling need for >4GB then amd64. If it's for a desktop then I'd suggest i386. 64-bit server software is mature, 64-bit desktop software isn't. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:06:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496FF16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F9113C4BD for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:06:32 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5DD6Zgf082455; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:06:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from m.apitz@oclcpica.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to m.apitz@oclcpica.org using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:06:35 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Reid Linnemann Message-ID: <20070613130635.GA69955@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20070613105208.GA38877@rebelion.Sisis.de> <466FEA77.8070105@cs.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <466FEA77.8070105@cs.okstate.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2007 13:06:32.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9CB48B0:01C7ADBB] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: open source X11 capture/playback tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:06:38 -0000 El día Wednesday, June 13, 2007 a las 08:00:39AM -0500, Reid Linnemann escribió: > Written by Matthias Apitz on 06/13/07 05:52>> > >Hello, > > > >Is there some Open Source X11 capture/playback tool for testing > >X11 applications by collecting the XEvents in a file, changing them > >and re-playing the XEvents? Thx in advance > > > > matthias > > A quick look at the ports tree reveals this candidate: > > Port: xnee-2.05 > Path: /usr/ports/x11/xnee > Info: X events recorder and player > I've looked around before posting, even with # make search name=.... maybe I'm to stupid :-( Thx for the hint matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:14:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5130616A4BF for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp112.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com (smtp112.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.102.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E12C713C447 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 5940 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 12:48:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tQvp4/3JA5swrc9BN+uH6UeVz3woLoWLGtCzpuyHjpUnwQDso6sIw/NHqZJdbSD5LcZ5ElXMVW7mLUDQSRPk9/758g1jAPTLdZZKH3qh8MHzrSS7tJSzPjAziiY+6hrJT51MPjbPOdDvZTkipVGtHyOhwGgOSjeImBXGO9neE70= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.80.169 with plain) by smtp112.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:48:06 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: CMFGKEAVM1lFEP_m8fRSCBOreFMDZSHYoS5.sjUuR.VgRHTK From: Stevan Tiefert To: Alexander Gudimov In-Reply-To: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> References: <145725751.20070613144539@newmail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:47:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1181738866.934.5.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question about use CPU Intel Xeon 5150 with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:14:48 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2007, 14:45 +0300 schrieb Alexander Gudimov: > Hello, questions. > > Please help me. What version of FreeBSD will prefer use on system with > CPU Intel Xeon 5150 ? Main problem with choice: i386 or amd64 > platforms. > amd64 has integrated EMT 64 support for Xeons and Dual/Quad Support for Intel processors... ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:25:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4525B16A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D4113C45A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so144772wra for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lua5+SW5MWbJe+2xX6hc1inlBU4Z/JQhgOTyhlIH7jyLK86fUZ5u+OdjDfUwu/sLvrEUyKmoM5fFaZ4gW7KhwkChvpBTgyuiohOJINflrbO1xRpW02BFq8zcM1Asvuv0cMYne32tmvMJhrNIdgn1GP5ji/wGWJtPfqsgBL8udTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cumoo499bMVLFXx6c2vVlnuKwt16erYyJvtXtn+pCAYhULUI/Kkzxmc1dIayqeh05MqxaCQpsK0C1sApBTd9beucLUf3+g5lxoG0a/Bs733BcWkuSGo7HULs59oextKsOG3VeS9ySa6+wNNIDymbDcVRogAvD7mizwr4T3kFfaM= Received: by 10.90.68.15 with SMTP id q15mr284056aga.1181741141946; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706130625l4fefdac5ke1d88783e459ab92@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:25:41 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:25:43 -0000 On 6/12/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga wrote: First off, my apologies to the group. I think I've been hitting "reply" only and not "reply-to-all". > > > > > > If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a > > > memory problem. See e.g. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ > > > > > > Roland > > > > Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a > > work around? > > > > http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html > > > > This machine I'm having problems with is an AMD K6. > > A K6-700? Without doing too much > flabulous research, I believe the K6 > stopped at 300MHz. A 700 would be > a K6-III, which would not have the > 32MB problem. Flaky and heat-sen- > sitive they are indeed. And there is > a lot of junk 133 memory out there > too. > > Based on my limited experience, about > 60% of the time you can run 100MHz > memory at 133MHz. If not you may have > to rejumper your bus-speed to 100. > If you are further unlucky the board > won't have a 7:1 multiplier and you'll > be stuck underclocking pretty seriously. > What is a 7:1 multiplier? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 13:32:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A7D16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D2713C480 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so332839pyi for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bxbtKmjL6p5MxuKcuRDBl5SO0pg/B0IpGY/RA8+3qMdGzFGDMfzdlx/NreamhgBAtd+O2v+tmdx4P65liUE7Rm5vUJqbzP9zWC234Iq8xhGrv5n0y+ep9E1DtzVAhFMVPJoASKVqhYKhKxepjEtYuIn7aLj5JBNmMKUdFJwsLEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BNdOOG2a6q9kAz/Xyir9tWKCX/5S4cnRCpizLOvuoDuu8gttT0UWvqPtAZ3iGkXIWRN1cl0pKhteQZGOzH9Jd7mnkXd9xlJu+Bq8bLglFWXrLZNl4GQPQYsif63H3M8X2Frz3FiY4TxbwS26rACg8Mkort0E+BnfpOzUjPUe7K4= Received: by 10.35.110.13 with SMTP id n13mr1234018pym.1181741565655; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706130632m289285dfi595442a6269e1645@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:32:45 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Ian Smith" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070612171902.ABA9616A4A5@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:32:49 -0000 On 6/13/07, Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a > > different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted > > and tried the install again with the same result. > > At the same place? If so, I'd tend to suspect memory rather than cpu. No it did not stop at the same place. I still suspect memory versus the cpu, especially considering that, apparently, there were several generations of the K6. I didn't know this. For several years, I did not have the time or money to play with hardware and therefore lost touch with much of the hardware that was out there. > > > I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. I've > > never seen a FreeBSD, OpenBSD or Linux (for that matter) hard hang on > > program compilation apart from hardware problems. Also of particular > [..] > > System configuration is as follows: > > > > AMD K6 700mHz > > 256mb RAM (PC 133) > > 13gb HDD > > 700MHz? Please show us the line from your /var/run/dmesg.boot showing > the exact cpu and clock. This will also indicate features & stepping > that should pinpoint the cpu model. From one 4.10 system hereabouts: > > CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (400.91-MHz 586-class CPU) > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x58c Stepping = 12 > Features=0x8021bf > AMD Features=0x80000800 > real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) > > That's a K6-2, though it doesn't say so there. From memory, the fastest > ever K6-2 was ~550MHz, but people did tend to wildly overclock them .. I will provide this info., hopefully tonight when I get home. I'm pretty sure this was never over clocked. It was the secretaries computer of the church I attend. I'm working on remaking the system into a web server as the secretary was just given a laptop. > > As others have mentioned, K6s don't like running too hot. I nurse two, > the 400 and a 450MHz box that run forever as long as the cpu fan is ok. > And when they do overheat, they'll freeze, but I've never actually seen > one damaged (as opposed to a couple of fried P3s of similar vintage) > > If you really are running it at 700MHz (at what bus speed setting?) then > I'd treat it to a new heat sink with fresh thermal paste and a BIG fan. Ok, sounds good. I'll see what I can find for this CPU. > > And sure it's best to run matched-speed memory. Your BIOS probably lets > you play with wait states and such, but the basic PCI bus speed might be > something weird if you've managed to crank the cpu up to 700MHz .. > How do wait states relate to memory speed? Please enlighten me. I have an idea, but I'm only theorizing, I'd like to know what it really means. If it's more in depth than one would like to type in a response, sending a link is fine. I learned quite a bit on the "Sig 11" links given earlier. Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 14:10:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E416A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) Received: from coke.conundrum.com (coke.conundrum.com [216.235.9.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EDD13C489 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) Received: from [216.235.13.82] ([216.235.13.82]) by coke.conundrum.com (8.13.1/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5DE9jcb017772; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:09:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@conundrum.com) In-Reply-To: <20070611203210.47bb240d@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <1ACC527A-E8B3-42C6-9F71-F10B0B6F77A4@conundrum.com> <20070611203210.47bb240d@gumby.homeunix.com.> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6835A622-00F1-4551-A632-E561ACD8A239@conundrum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Pounsett Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:03:38 -0400 To: RW X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d NETWORKING dependancy not waiting for network to be up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:10:08 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-Jun-2007, at 15:32 , RW wrote: > I wrote a lttle rcng script to handle it it. It runs immediately > before ntpdate,and waits until it can ping my ISP's nameservers > (ignoring the 127.0.0.1 entry in resolv.conf), or you can specify ip > addresses. Excellent idea. Thanks for the suggestion! Matt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGb/lBae4z2vjbC8sRArf/AJ9F4R9g+JPbBnO6oy/UAQTLzcY6+ACg7pXN Z7aja8X6wd869ITjMqXpyMI= =sMzI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 14:20:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CEC16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417E613C46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5DEKWLR094509 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:20:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:19:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20070612085543.02C8.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200706121047.24805.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706131019.26099.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD-6.2 & Xorg-7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:20:34 -0000 On Tuesday 12 June 2007 10:47:24 am John Nielsen wrote: > On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:55:54 am Gerard wrote: > > I have had nothing but grief since updating to the new Xorg-7.2 > > version on my PC. Unexplained crashes, lockups, etc. No doubt, some of > > the problems are my fault; however I cannot seem to get them corrected. > > > > Now, I was wondering how this would work. > > > > 1) Download a fresh ISO of FreeBSD-6.2 on to another PC > > 2) Erase my HDs on the PC presently running FBSD > > 3) Reformat the HDs > > 4) Install the fresh copy of FBSD > > > > Will that give me a system that I can directly install Xorg-7.2 on to > > or do I still have to go through the procedure shown in the "UPDATING" > > file? Suppose I install Xorg-7.2 doing the actual install of FBSD; > > will that make any difference? In any case, I would build a new kernel > > ASAP after the new install. > > That should work fine, as long as you remember to run mergebase.sh on the > new system. It's counterintuitive and won't have much work to do, but it > will do useful things like create the /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local symlink and > change some defaults in /etc so (e.g.) rc.d and periodic scripts won't run > twice. > > If it's just your ports you're trying to refresh and don't have any worries > about your base system, you could also try something like this: > > 0) Back up your entire system. Also make a note of what packages you have > installed (pkg_info > /root/pkg-list.txt, for example). > > 1) Delete ALL ports from your system. I find it's most efficient to do > something like this: > a) make backups, esp of files in /usr/local/etc > b) # pkg_info | awk -F ' ' '{print $1}' | xargs pkg_delete -f For the archives, this works better with "xargs -n 1" in place of "xargs" above. JN > c) review remaining files under /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local, if any > d) # rm -r /usr/X11R6/* /usr/local/* > > 2) Update your base system. csup, buildworld, etc. > > 3) Update your ports tree. portsnap, etc. > > 4) Run mergebase.sh > # sh /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh > > 5) Reinstall everything you want installed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 14:42:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563F416A469; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD95E13C469; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5DEgiZ0016916; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:42:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Jin Guojun Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:01:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <200706121527.04274.jhb@freebsd.org> <466F4642.8070001@george.lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <466F4642.8070001@george.lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706131001.25840.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:42:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3412/Wed Jun 13 08:42:18 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:42:47 -0000 On Tuesday 12 June 2007 09:20:02 pm Jin Guojun wrote: > John Baldwin wrote:=20 > On Saturday 09 June 2007 08:53:18 pm Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > =20 > I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because=20 > anything equal to or below 1G >=20 > options MAXDSIZ=3D"(1024*1024*1024)" >=20 > will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. > I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size=20 > related. >=20 > =20 > Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration,=20 > following line causes the problem: >=20 > options MAXDSIZ=3D"(2097152U*1024)" >=20 > Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen=20 > for some program? > =20 >=20 > This is setting aside 2GB for malloc which leaves only 1GB for all of mma= p and=20 > stack. You probably don't have enough address space to map your binary. > =20 > This does not quite explain the problem.=20 > First of all, the MAXDSIZ is the maximum size for users to set their own= datasize limit by 'limit' > utility.=A0 If user do not set a high limit for datasize, it should not = be a problem. UTSL. By default proc0 gets a hard limit (lim_max vs lim_cur) of MAXDSIZ, and the max limit is what the ELF image activator in the kernel uses when figuring out where to mmap the runtime linker: /* * We load the dynamic linker where a userland call * to mmap(0, ...) would put it. The rationale behind this * calculation is that it leaves room for the heap to grow to * its maximum allowed size. */ addr =3D round_page((vm_offset_t)imgp->proc->p_vmspace->vm_daddr + lim_max(imgp->proc, RLIMIT_DATA)); > The second aspect also counters this assumption, for machines that have = less than or equal to > 1 GB memory, and setting the MAXDISZ =3D the maximum memory size will no= t cause such problem. > For example, if the physical memory size is 512 MB, and setting MAXDSIZ= =3D(512*1024*1024) > will not cause this problem. Or if the physical memory is 1GB, setting M= AXDSIZ=3D(1024*1024*1024) > will not cause the problem either. Umm, the amount of physical memory has no bearing on how the virtual address space for userland is laid out. Do you know what virtual memory is and how it works? Your first e-mail seems to contradict this paragraph as in your first e-mail you noted that the physical memory doesn't matter, the solution was to not raise MAXDSIZ higher than 1GB and that is consistent with running out of virtual address space due to MAXDSIZ reserving too much address space for malloc(). =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 14:50:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338B316A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6F613C45A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070613145020.WAKQ16681.mta13.adelphia.net@laptop>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:20 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "Ian Smith" Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:20 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:50:21 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 "Bob" wrote: > Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log > records. > To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get > requests to other URL's. > Is there some configuration option I can turn on to stop my server from > servicing these bogus requests? > > 122-124-129-27.dynamic.hinet.net - - [04/May/2007:04:38:18 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 [..] > 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:39 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 > kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:44 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php > HTT > kaista.fi - - [03/May/2007:01:35:45 -0400] "GET http://pro_xy.t35.com/AZ.php > H [..] > r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:40 -0400] "\x04\x01\x1a\vE\x10\xac\"" 400 - "-" "-" > r - - [10/May/2007:09:42:50 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "- > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:21 -0400] "GET > http://www.internetsec.org/a > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:37 -0400] "\x04\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:52 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" What Chuck said about disabling|securing mod_proxy and PHP, for sure .. But in most cases you chopped off the most important information; the HTTP code indicating apache's response to the request. On those last two, 200 indicates apache served a page of 7036 bytes. If that's the served size of your home "/" page then you've little to worry about. 40x responses indicate refusal; page not found, permission denied etc. Here at least weekly I see such as: 220.137.74.222 - - [12/Jun/2007:02:07:08 +1000] "CONNECT msa-mx10.hinet.net:25 HTTP/1.0" 403 272 "-" "-" 403 = Permission denied. In this case, because I disallow 'no referrer' plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from non-local addresses, blocking heaps of rogue robots, but CONNECT requests don't work anyway in apache 1.3 in default configuration .. older logs show 405 responses to these. 222.141.50.175 - - [21/May/2007:23:46:01 +1000] "GET http://www.baidu.com/ HTTP/1.1" 200 3847 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows NT)" In this case, apache served (200 response) *my* home page (3847 bytes) on all such would-be proxy requests. Not a problem. > 122-124-129-55.dynamic.hinet.net - - [10/May/2007:18:29:38 -0400] "CONNECT > 220.1 FWIW, nearly every CONNECT request here for the last 2 years has been for or from some hinet.net host or other. They're well up in the top 10 spam sources too, so I won't see any mail from *@hinet.net complaining! Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ian Smith Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:09 AM To: Bob Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests Sorry about cutting off the end of the record. > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:37 -0400] "\x04\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" > 89.196.37.169 - - [15/May/2007:02:50:52 -0400] "\x05\x01" 200 7036 "-" "-" You wrote "On these two, 200 indicates apache served a page of 7036 bytes. If that's the served size of your home "/" page then you've little to worry about." I checked with ls -l command and I have no pages 7036 in size. My question is why is apache servicing a request for "\x04\x01", this is not a valid request in first place. You wrote "because I disallow 'no referrer' plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from non-local addresses, blocking heaps of rogue robots" Could you give me a example of the httpd.config coding you used for this? These denied requests get logged in the access.log, I would think they should be logged in the error.log. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:19:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5335916A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-4.eunet.yu (smtpclu-4.eunet.yu [194.247.192.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB7713C487 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-225-43.eunet.yu [213.198.225.43]) by smtpclu-4.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DFJHjf008386; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:19:19 +0200 Message-Id: <200706131519.l5DFJHjf008386@smtpclu-4.eunet.yu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:19:24 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20070613130635.GA69955@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20070613105208.GA38877@rebelion.Sisis.de> <466FEA77.8070105@cs.okstate.edu> <20070613130635.GA69955@rebelion.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_20,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -0.7 Cc: Reid Linnemann , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: open source X11 capture/playback tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:19:35 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:06:35 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Wednesday, June 13, 2007 a las 08:00:39AM -0500, Reid > Linnemann escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > > Written by Matthias Apitz on 06/13/07 05:52>> > > >Hello, > > > > > >Is there some Open Source X11 capture/playback tool for testing > > >X11 applications by collecting the XEvents in a file, changing them > > >and re-playing the XEvents? Thx in advance > > > > > > matthias > >=20 > > A quick look at the ports tree reveals this candidate: > >=20 > > Port: xnee-2.05 > > Path: /usr/ports/x11/xnee > > Info: X events recorder and player > >=20 >=20 > I've looked around before posting, even with >=20 > # make search name=3D.... Use 'make search key=3D' -- it covers all (name/path/info) fields. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:37:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EF616A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4870313C44C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23430 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 15:37:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jun 2007 15:37:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 47AB128440; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:37:45 -0400 (EDT) To: "dhaneshk k" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:37:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (dhaneshk k.'s message of "Tue\, 12 Jun 2007 06\:40\:57 +0000") Message-ID: <44fy4vyieu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg libraries upgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:37:47 -0000 "dhaneshk k" writes: > This is Dhanesh , I m a newbe to FreeBsd , I had a intel p4 box > with FreeBSD-6.1 Os with Gnome 2.18. installed and , this desktop > working fine for last 2 months . Mean while I tried to install > OpenOffice from ports collection for this box , but it is asking for > an upgrade of Xorg libraries , so I followed the /usr/ports/UPDATING > procedure line by line ,, every thing went fine at the stage > where I reached > > # portupgrade -aP ( while runnig this command about an hour > or more ) ther HAPPENED a power > failure , after this the m/c restarted and the Desktop > environment lost for ever , Its asking for command login without > Desktop GUI login , ther is an error message its showing > gdm_server_spawn : Xserver not found : /usr/X11R6/bin/X : 0 -audit > /var/gdm/: 0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt9 > Failed to start X server several times in a short time period , > disabling display:0 > > > I tried to continue the portupgrade -aP command again but its > showing errors , > Stale dependency : at-spi-1.18.1_1 ----> xmlcatmgr-2.2 -- manually > run 'pkgdb -F' to fix , or specify -0 to force > > asking pkgdb -F to run > > # pkgdb -F I executed but its showing some > > > Duplicated origin : multimedia/gstreamer -gstreamer-0.10.12 > gstreamer80-0.8.12_2 > Unregister any of them ?[no] > > I enter no for 3/4 times for some duplicate origins > > > Then it asking for Stale dependency at-spi-1.18.1_1 -->xmlcatmgr-2.2 > (textproc/xmlcatmgr) : > ........................ > ............................ > > Install stale dependency ?[yes] y > but its failed showing that stop in /usr/ports/textproc/xmlcatmgr > (I tried to to deinstall and make reinstall textproc/xmlcatmgr > many times it also failed all the times ) > > Here I requesting anyone of you to help me to > > 1 provide the method to retrive the Desktop environment ? OR > > 2 Other wise how I can remove all the the things related to xserver > (so that I have to install the Gnome 2.18 again as I did was > portinstall /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 ) Did you do the gstreamer updates already, as directed in UPDATING? If so, try something like "portupgrade -rf gstreamer". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:39:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CC916A46D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6099213C4B7 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (pollux.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.61]) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5DFdGjX092799 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5DFdG8t092798; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pollux.dfwlp.com: www set sender to freebsd@dfwlp.com using -f Received: from 167.246.36.14 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <16907.167.246.36.14.1181749156.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:39:16 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: intel 965G chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:39:19 -0000 is anyone sucessfully using an intel 965G based motherboard with FreeBSD 6.2? ive seen many bug reports from last year concerning 965's ability to correctly see hard drives, but ive not been able to discern if these bugs have bee i just bought a 965 based board from ebay, without thinking about whether or not it will work in freebsd! judging by that boards features, it had me at hello (onboard intel gigabit, tons of usb ports, onboard 1394, onboard 6 port sata raid(0,1,5). if anyone has any experience with this chipset, id appreciate to know how it went. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne freebsd@dfwlp.com http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:51:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A43816A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [67.139.134.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D60B613C45A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 61886 invoked by uid 98); 13 Jun 2007 15:51:06 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by o2.hostbaby.com (envelope-from , uid 1013) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.7/3411. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.163353 secs); 13 Jun 2007 15:51:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO l-i-e.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 15:51:06 -0000 Received: from 216.230.84.67 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com) by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:51:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <34588.216.230.84.67.1181749866.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:51:06 -0500 (CDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "FreeBSD" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: periodic.conf quieter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:05 -0000 Thanks to the fine folks here, I've gotten periodic.conf to only output messages I need to know, *except* for this one: Security check: (output mailed separately) I've looked through /et/defaults/periodic.conf, Google a fair amount, and am still coming up empty with a setting to suppress that one... I'm probably just being stupid (again) but what am I missing? -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:51:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71A16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5A013C44C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:51:52 -0400 id 00056417.46701298.00017619 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 10:51:51 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Mark Stout In-Reply-To: <20070613023704.64277.qmail@web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <20070613023704.64277.qmail@web53701.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:51:51 -0400 Message-Id: <1181749911.1161.4.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: mark_stout04@yahoo.com Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com, illoai@gmail.com, mcs@vpm.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:51:53 -0000 entering: mountroot> ufs:da0s1a ...doesn't work What does "?" command list. ~BAS On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:37 -0700, Mark Stout wrote: > I couldn't load da0s1a even though /dev/da0s1a is my root drive. Manually load my old kernel from the prompt worked. > > I believe the mountroot is during the boot load. I'm not anywhere near being able to do anything. > > I have no idea what the problem is. > > [jackbarnett@gmail.com] wrote: > > no idea, but maybe: > boot /boot/kernel/kernel > or > boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel > > What is 'mountroot' - is that the boot loader or the kernel/system > giving you that? > > try mounting your root drive! > > do a `df -k`, anything already mounted? > > oh! or try: > fsck > > did it ask you to login? > > > Mark Stout wrote: > > I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED and after a installworld and mergemaster its booting into 'mountroot>' and nothing I type mounts. This is a production machine so I'm in dire need of assistence. > > > > [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: > > On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > >>> Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook > >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html I removed the > >>> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to compile the kernel its failing on > >>> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the line above MD5, options LKM. > >>> What's happening here? These two options papear in the LINT file. I can't find anything > >>> that explains why this would happen. > >>> > >> A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and > >> symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > >> > >> I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new > >> kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not > >> need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And > >> support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere in GENERIC? > >> > >> # These all failed as unknown options: > >> unknown option "MD5" > >> unknown option "LKM" > >> unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > >> unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > >> unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > >> unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter 14 Securing FreeBSD) > >> > >> > >> # Do not understand why these are fialing > >> config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > >> config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > >> config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > >> > >> # This failed as a syntax error > >> controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > >> > >> > > > > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated > > stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" > > line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). > > > > IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all > > you should need for those in your kernel config > > is: > > device ata > > device atadisk > > device atapicd > > (and obviously:) > > device eisa > > device pci > > Which are already part of GENERIC. > > > > /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. > > Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES > > and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist > > and buttons to push. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:53:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA78916A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C950313C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5DFrM8U022152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:53:22 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5DFrLYi014183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:53:22 -0700 Message-ID: <467012F2.90208@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:53:22 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <16907.167.246.36.14.1181749156.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <16907.167.246.36.14.1181749156.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.13.83033 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: intel 965G chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:53:23 -0000 Jonathan Horne wrote: > is anyone sucessfully using an intel 965G based motherboard with FreeBSD 6.2? > ive seen many bug reports from last year concerning 965's ability to correctly > see hard drives, but ive not been able to discern if these bugs have bee > > i just bought a 965 based board from ebay, without thinking about whether or not > it will work in freebsd! judging by that boards features, it had me at hello > (onboard intel gigabit, tons of usb ports, onboard 1394, onboard 6 port sata > raid(0,1,5). > > if anyone has any experience with this chipset, id appreciate to know how it went. > > thanks, > -- > Jonathan Horne > freebsd@dfwlp.com > http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org > ASUS P5B Deluxe works perfectly fine for the most part. USB/PnP just doesn't function properly under CURRENT for some odd reason. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:14:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BDD16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from omta14.mta.everyone.net (sitemail2.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC31413C447 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcs@vpm.com) Received: from dm51.mta.everyone.net (bigiplb-dsnat [172.16.0.19]) by omta14.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78871456B1; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm51 Received: by dm51.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 403968d3) id dm51.465dfe37.1eeae3; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:13:06 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQFgCwNGcBeSglFKqAIAAAAE,7010df4f7dbd177a807c0004ccad141f From: "Mark Stout" To: "Brian A. Seklecki" Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:13:01 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1181749911.1161.4.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com, illoai@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:14:30 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian A. Seklecki [mailto:bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:52 AM > To: Mark Stout > Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com; illoai@gmail.com; mcs@vpm.com; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE > > > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:37 -0700, Mark Stout wrote: > > I couldn't load da0s1a even though /dev/da0s1a is my root > drive. Manually load my old kernel from the prompt worked. > > > > I believe the mountroot is during the boot load. I'm not > anywhere near being able to do anything. > > > > I have no idea what the problem is. > > > > [jackbarnett@gmail.com] wrote: > > > > no idea, but maybe: > > boot /boot/kernel/kernel > > or > > boot /boot/kernel.old/kernel > > > > What is 'mountroot' - is that the boot loader or the kernel/system > > giving you that? > > > > try mounting your root drive! > > > > do a `df -k`, anything already mounted? > > > > oh! or try: > > fsck > > > > did it ask you to login? > > > > > > Mark Stout wrote: > > > I followed all the steps in the handbook as well as UPDATED > and after a installworld and mergemaster its booting into > 'mountroot>' and nothing I type mounts. This is a production > machine so I'm in dire need of assistence. > > > > > > [illoai@gmail.com] wrote: > > > On 11/06/07, Mark Stout wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Following the tasks in Rebuilding "world" in the handbook > > >>> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworl > d.html I removed the > > >>> /usr/obj directory and did a buildworld. When tryinmg to > compile the kernel its failing on > > >>> unknown option "MD5". Commenting that out it fails on the > line above MD5, options LKM. > > >>> What's happening here? These two options papear in the > LINT file. I can't find anything > > >>> that explains why this would happen. > > >>> > > >> A follow-up to my last email. I copied GENERIC to RADIUS2 and > > >> symlinked to /root/kernel. Then added the various LINT options. > > >> > > >> I started commenting out what is failing when I try to compile a new > > >> kernel. All are from the LINT file. Is MD5 a default that does not > > >> need to be specifically added? What about ICMP_BANDLIM? And > > >> support for IDE drives. Are these already handed elsewhere > in GENERIC? > > >> > > >> # These all failed as unknown options: > > >> unknown option "MD5" > > >> unknown option "LKM" > > >> unknown option "CD9660_ROOTDELAY" > > >> unknown option "NSWAPDEV" > > >> unknown option "TCP_COMPAT_42" > > >> unknown option "ICMP_BANDLIM" (found in Handbook in Chapter > 14 Securing FreeBSD) > > >> > > >> > > >> # Do not understand why these are fialing > > >> config: Error: device "acd0" is unknown > > >> config: Error: device "wfd0" is unknown > > >> config: Error: device "wst0" is unknown > > >> > > >> # This failed as a syntax error > > >> controller wdc0 at isa? port "IO_WD1" bio irq 14 > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Most of the above looks like old, deprecated > > > stuff from 5.x and earlier (the "controller wdc0" > > > line reminds me of 3.x or maybe NetBSD). > > > > > > IDE drive support is all handled by ata(4), all > > > you should need for those in your kernel config > > > is: > > > device ata > > > device atadisk > > > device atapicd > > > (and obviously:) > > > device eisa > > > device pci > > > Which are already part of GENERIC. > > > > > > /usr/src/sys//conf/LINT doesn't exist in 6.x. > > > Try looking at /usr/src/sys//conf/NOTES > > > and /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES for knobs to twist > > > and buttons to push. > > > > > > entering: > > mountroot> ufs:da0s1a > > ...doesn't work > > What does "?" command list. > > ~BAS > It lists all available drives mount points and then some, e.g. fd0, da0, da01, da01s, da0s1a, da0s1b, da0s1c, etc., etc. None of which mounts. Below is my /etc/fstab. So obviously da0s1a or /dev/da0s1a should mount. But it doesn't. I had to go into the loader prompt, unload the kernel, load the old kernel and that booted the system. Now I've restored the backup copy of my /etc directory from /var/tmp/etc and I re-ran a new buildworld and buildkernel. Now I'm about to go and do the installworld and installkernel. But I'm hoping to get a better understanding of what happened before I do. # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/da0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da1s1e /data ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1g /radius ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/wcd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:38:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2002916A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B6513C4BB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 30382 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 02:37:59 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 02:37:58 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:37:55 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20070614023755.648284c9@localhost> In-Reply-To: <403EC02DF722823DF06ECF9E@ganymede.hub.org> References: <403EC02DF722823DF06ECF9E@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iLO or DRAC like interface ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:38:00 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:23:12 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > Does anyone know of anything non-HP / Dell that would give me the same > functionality as iLO/DRAC? > I don't want something sticking out the back, you do or dont? > either a card (or motherboard?) that has an ethernet slot in it that would give > me full remote console / bios / etc access to the machine ... I believe IPMI cards should do what iLO/DRAC do (well, they are IPMI complaint...). Otherwise, a serial console or IP KVM (assuming you want to access it more than 1 metre away from the box itself ;) B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:38:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B8F16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC013C4EC for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:10 -0400 id 00056419.46701D72.00017E5D Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 11:38:10 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: ceo@l-i-e.com In-Reply-To: <34588.216.230.84.67.1181749866.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> References: <34588.216.230.84.67.1181749866.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1181752689.1161.16.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: ceo@l-i-e.com Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: periodic.conf quieter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:38:13 -0000 # 450.status-security daily_status_security_enable="YES" # Security check ...probably no. # See "Security options" below for more options # Security options # These options are used by the security periodic(8) scripts spawned in # 450.status-security above. daily_status_security_inline="NO" # Run inline ? daily_status_security_output="root" # user or /file On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:51 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote: > Thanks to the fine folks here, I've gotten periodic.conf to only > output messages I need to know, *except* for this one: > > Security check: > (output mailed separately) > > I've looked through /et/defaults/periodic.conf, Google a fair amount, > and am still coming up empty with a setting to suppress that one... > > I'm probably just being stupid (again) but what am I missing? > -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:43:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D157616A46B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C0F13C4C9 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 30994 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 02:43:47 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 02:43:46 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:43:43 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20070614024343.10ff6632@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:43:47 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:20 -0400 "Bob" wrote: Hi Bob, please learn how to quote in a reply to a message - it's pretty hard to figure out who's written what otherwise. > I checked with ls -l command and I have no pages 7036 in size. (hmm... does those bytes include the headers et al ? if they do, then u should be looking for something else other than 7036 in the filesystem...anyway... > My question > is why is apache servicing a request for "\x04\x01", this is not a valid > request in first place. maybe if you show us your apache config it would be easier to figure out what you allow or not. To make it simpler, the DEFAULT config in apache (with no mod_proxy) is quite secure wrt access to / . > You wrote "because I disallow 'no referrer' > plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from non-local addresses, blocking > heaps of rogue robots" > Could you give me a example of the httpd.config coding you used for this? > These denied requests get logged in the access.log, I would think they > should be logged in the error.log. well, they are not an error from apache's POV, are they? they get served OK :) therefore, access. (the fact that you dont like it doenst make it less "correct" for Apache ;) B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:45:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E8116A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from designaproduct.biz (135-shost.hostoffice.hu [195.228.74.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDB213C44C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [172.16.0.43] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by designaproduct.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6921D1DD42A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:38:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <46701EB3.1070006@shopzeus.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:43:31 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46667240.6030604@janh.de> <4666F7BC.50803@shopzeus.com> <20070612161425.39f5d246@server25.gelita.swe> In-Reply-To: <20070612161425.39f5d246@server25.gelita.swe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rdesktop: segmentation fault under xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:45:24 -0000 Anders Troback wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:06:52 +0200 > Laszlo Nagy wrote: > > >> Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> >>> youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> For me, rdesktop works -- I have all my ports upgraded... >>>>> >>>> ldd `which rdesktop` says? >>>> >>> /usr/local/bin/rdesktop: >>> libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x280a9000) >>> libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x2819c000) >>> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28282000) >>> libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28367000) >>> libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x2836a000) >>> librpcsvc.so.3 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x2836f000) >>> >>> Jan Henrik >>> >> For me, this is a bit different: >> >> %ldd `which rdesktop` >> /usr/local/bin/rdesktop: >> libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x280a0000) >> libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28193000) >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28279000) >> libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x2835e000) >> libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x28361000) >> librpcsvc.so.3 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x28366000) >> >> Although the file names are the same. Is this a problem? >> >> Laszlo >> > > Hi, > > I have the same problem here after the xorg upgrade! > Nobody answered to this for a while, so can we consider this as a bug? Where should I send a bug report? Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:52:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED2916A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A0213C45B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 31756 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 02:52:29 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 02:52:28 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:52:25 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Worth Bishop" Message-ID: <20070614025225.70b83a0c@localhost> In-Reply-To: <004b01c7ad07$b3d474d0$0801000a@S0030153310> References: <004b01c7ad07$b3d474d0$0801000a@S0030153310> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:52:30 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:38:19 -0400 "Worth Bishop" wrote: > Addendum: For what it's worth, the 250Gb Samsung drive was added when the > system was upgraded - it's only 3-4 months old. Worth, that doesnt mean much - drives can (and do) fail anyway. I suggest you run smartctl ( sysutils/smartmontools ) to run tests on your drive and ensure you don't have any actual problems with it btw, you don't mention from what version you had upgraded to 6.1. Did you do a full world upgrade as well as kernel? from your previous email, you ended up having some kernel build problems. 1) it is good practise to rename your kernel file (and ident line inside it) from GENERIC once you've modified it. It makes it obvious to see whether you are truly running the same GENERIC as everyone else. 2) make sure you have the latest and proper code for your line of src you need (eg, -STABLE , or RELEASE-p5 ,etc). You should use cvsup for this. If you need them, the default config files are in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ . B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." Sam Brown I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:16:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041EE16A46B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C767613C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 1025 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 03:16:07 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 03:16:06 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: FreeBSD Questions ML Message-ID: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:16:10 -0000 Hi all, all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done: - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds) - Calc dies right away - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, if opening didnt crash)... v strange. What may be : Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems at all. Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. My account using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). I haven't got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with. What is not (i think) : I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at all kernel-level). I thought it was related to new java libraries (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s). Everything else in the system(s) is working fine. So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D I've done a full ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 and dumped the text version of it at http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i cant figure out what it means or what's causing it. Any clues, anyone? :) thanks!! _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome If Bill Gates had a dollar for every time a Windows box crashed... .. Oh, wait a minute, he already does. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:23:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1752D16A502 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D043813C469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:23:53 -0400 id 00056415.46702829.0001855E Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:23:52 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: "Dixit, Viraj" In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:23:51 -0400 Message-Id: <1181755431.1161.24.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: viraj.dixit@cityofpaloalto.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem Full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:23:54 -0000 Check out "df -i" Also check out "man tunefs" tunefs(8) "-m" flag. ~BAS On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:03 -0700, Dixit, Viraj wrote: > Folks, > > My FreeBSD 5.3 system message logs are showing me this info, > > Jun 12 14:53:48 gatekeeper kernel: pid 58059 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > Jun 12 15:34:17 gatekeeper kernel: pid 60158 (ftpd), uid 1049 inumber > 141313 on /u > sr: filesystem full > > I am not finding any data files being uploaded in that volume. This is > what the df commands shows. After going through the /usr volume, there > is no indication that anything has changed. > > /dev/da0s1a 537936 36250 458652 7% / > devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev > /dev/da0s1e 10755828 844602 9050760 9% /local > /dev/da0s1f 7529054 7381944 -455214 107% /usr > /dev/da0s1d 14526318 9898206 3466008 74% /var > > Any ideas! Thanks, > VJ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:28:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F74716A46D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE8F913C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 77440 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 12:45:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fM0LBsKQBiJa4hmv1V+SAo9AtMpNx+pHYG3FYEQbCmNdoP8j2qL5Vf0hvIeNZJ7SxT3UjlZoMGLSUpvRYwxssBu1oJW6eJJUPX507bUUEbg5WmIwAhPNTFw3LlLKgPfQ0P5bcZL/lW+p50PaHpU+y/eS8Itv+nrSzi7t8w7w6RE= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.80.169 with plain) by smtp102.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:45:37 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: jT68LA4VM1nuTYO3h6aixE2fYibMaUCL.UYQpKvgvw7CSTbZFwikip3N9Hq_PUvUMOB1xEjZDAflc_eCACLnZboLGQ-- From: Stevan Tiefert To: Tsu-Fan Cheng In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:45:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1181738716.934.2.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: laptop video output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:28:03 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2007, 08:12 -0400 schrieb Tsu-Fan Cheng: > hi, > (hope this is in right forum) I want to buy a laptop, but dont know if > fbsd support video output so i can use to do presentation. Thank you!! > > TFC > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, Video Output is supported by the X Window System and his drivers, not really by FreeBSD. Look at http://www.x.org or in the man-pages like e.g. "man 4x sis" for the video output capabilities for the sis-chipsets... ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:30:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E25A16A46E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FC213C457 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 2169 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 03:30:32 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 03:30:31 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:30:28 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Tsu-Fan Cheng" Message-ID: <20070614033028.3d7845cc@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: laptop video output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:30:33 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:12:44 -0400 "Tsu-Fan Cheng" wrote: > (hope this is in right forum) I want to buy a laptop, but dont know if > fbsd support video output so i can use to do presentation. Thank you!! you should ask in freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org - check the archives first, there usually is quite a bit of discussion wrt which brand/model to get. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future." Oscar Wilde I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:52:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FDE16A46F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A295713C483 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (pollux.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.61]) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5DHqNYX095337; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5DHqMdg095336; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pollux.dfwlp.com: www set sender to freebsd@dfwlp.com using -f Received: from 192.168.125.138 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhorne) by webmail.dfwlp.org with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:22 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <64547.192.168.125.138.1181757142.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0706130225j52a883a0rd772e7154ce3d470@mail.gmail.com> References: <200706121851.57408.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <14989d6e0706130225j52a883a0rd772e7154ce3d470@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:22 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jonathan Horne" To: "Christian Walther" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on pollux.dfwlp.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde@mail.kde.org Subject: Re: cannot select arts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:52:25 -0000 > On 13/06/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: >> cc: freebsd-questions: >> > [...] >> is there somewhere in kde that i can specify that i want arts to be an >> available option to multimedia apps? > > Applications need to be built with arts-Support, so I guess that this > is missing on your second box. cd to a directory of one of the ports > in question, and do a make config to check wether arts-support is > available and selected, or not. > > HTH > Christian > well, i went into the x11/kde3 port, and did a 'make config-recursive', and checked over every config file that would come into play during the kde3 build. the only one that named anything for arts, was x11/kdebase3. which, i did an unisntall, and reinstall of that port with: [X] ARTSWRAPPER Suid wrapper for aRts, req'd for realtime prio but amarok still sees no arts options for putput plugin. there is also no arts options in the amarok config. i love the fact that using ports/packages-6-stable, i can do 30 hours of work in just a few, but i am secumbing to the notion that i may have to come back and just rebuild kde the old fasioned way :( -- Jonathan Horne freebsd@dfwlp.com http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:55:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB0D16A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7243C13C458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:55:12 -0400 id 00056407.46702F80.00000556 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:55:12 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Worth Bishop In-Reply-To: <004701c7ad07$0e9f5d90$0801000a@S0030153310> References: <004701c7ad07$0e9f5d90$0801000a@S0030153310> Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:55:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1181757311.1161.42.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: wbishop@twosensemedia.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:55:13 -0000 Read: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html Also, is your /usr/src tagged RELENG_6_2 ? You can remove DEBUG=-g and that problem does not occur? You didn't try to update your src to tree to STABLE or CURRENT? ~~BAS On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:33 -0400, Worth Bishop wrote: > ed GENERIC and edited it, noting that "options ddb" was > already enabled. We added 'makeoptions DEBUG=-g # > Build > kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols' as suggested and tried to "make > buildkernel" which errored out stating that KDB must be enabled to use > DDB. > We edited KERNEL.DEBUG to add 'options KDB > # > Enable kernel debugger' and attempted to "make buildkernel" again. > This > time, the process stopped again with the message: > > THIRD ERROR EVENT > > [snip] > inline-unit-growth=100 --param > arge-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-bounda -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 17:57:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5716A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D5D13C4B8 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:57:04 -0400 id 00056415.46702FF0.000005C3 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:57:04 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20070614025225.70b83a0c@localhost> References: <004b01c7ad07$b3d474d0$0801000a@S0030153310> <20070614025225.70b83a0c@localhost> Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:57:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1181757423.1161.45.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: freebsd@meijome.net Cc: Worth Bishop , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Repeating Crash - Sleeping thread; Fatal trap 12: page fault; warning: 'T2' might be used uninitialized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:57:05 -0000 Hardware can be eliminated by running memtest86 bootable ISOs from the web site. A bad sector test on the drives would be less ambiguous (kernel messages preceeding a panic). Smart can be helpful. Overheating CPUs and underpowered/overheated Power Supplies can cause problems, but they would normally manifest in memtest86+ failures www.memtest.org/ On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 02:52 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:38:19 -0400 > "Worth Bishop" wrote: > > > Addendum: For what it's worth, the 250Gb Samsung drive was added when the > > system was upgraded - it's only 3-4 months old. > > Worth, > that doesnt mean much - drives can (and do) fail anyway. I suggest you run > smartctl ( sysutils/smartmontools ) to run tests on your drive and ensure you > don't have any actual problems with it > > btw, you don't mention from what version you had upgraded to 6.1. Did you do a > full world upgrade as well as kernel? > > > from your previous email, you ended up having some kernel build problems. > 1) it is good practise to rename your kernel file (and ident line inside it) > from GENERIC once you've modified it. It makes it obvious to see whether you > are truly running the same GENERIC as everyone else. > > 2) make sure you have the latest and proper code for your line of src you need > (eg, -STABLE , or RELEASE-p5 ,etc). You should use cvsup for this. If you need > them, the default config files are in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ . > > B > _________________________ > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." > Sam Brown > > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. > Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been > Warned. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:05:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935F616A475 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (smtpclu-6.eunet.yu [194.247.192.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F8513C4D0 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-225-43.eunet.yu [213.198.225.43]) by smtpclu-6.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DI59LG026502; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:05:13 GMT Message-Id: <200706131805.l5DI59LG026502@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> References: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_SjzzLjqhoI/hutgsBvzU7wa" X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: TW_BM,TW_XF,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions ML Subject: Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:05:33 -0000 --MP_SjzzLjqhoI/hutgsBvzU7wa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > Hi all, > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using > 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. > The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done: >=20 > - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds) > - Calc dies right away > - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, > if opening didnt crash)... v strange. >=20 > What may be : > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE > and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems > at all. Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. My account > using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). I haven't > got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with. >=20 > What is not (i think) : > I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing > happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine > (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have > ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running > somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at > all kernel-level). I thought it was related to new java libraries > (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has > changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s). > Everything else in the system(s) is working fine. >=20 >=20 > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D >=20 > I've done a full=20 > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0=20 > and dumped the text version of it at=20 >=20 > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614=20 >=20 > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i > cant figure out what it means or what's causing it. I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_ experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1). Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try. I attached my pkg_info, please take a look. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 --MP_SjzzLjqhoI/hutgsBvzU7wa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:19:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149A16A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-1.eunet.yu (smtpclu-1.eunet.yu [194.247.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497F213C45E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-225-43.eunet.yu [213.198.225.43]) by smtpclu-1.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DIJBqT001385; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:19:12 +0200 Message-Id: <200706131819.l5DIJBqT001385@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:19:21 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Nikola Lecic In-Reply-To: <200706131805.l5DI59LG026502@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> References: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> <200706131805.l5DI59LG026502@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_JxU9DBH7Ck/pO/No3X0M2ms" X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_50, SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2, TW_BD, TW_BM, TW_BW, TW_BX, TW_DF, TW_FW, TW_GT, TW_IB, TW_TD, TW_VF, TW_XF, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 1.5 X-AVAS-Spam-Level: xxx Cc: Norberto Meijome , FreeBSD Questions ML Subject: Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:19:34 -0000 --MP_JxU9DBH7Ck/pO/No3X0M2ms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200 Nikola Lecic wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000 > Norberto Meijome wrote: >=20 > > Hi all, > > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using > > 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. > > The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done: > >=20 > > - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds) > > - Calc dies right away > > - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, > > if opening didnt crash)... v strange. > >=20 > > What may be : > > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE > > and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems > > at all. Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. My account > > using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). I haven't > > got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with. > >=20 > > What is not (i think) : > > I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing > > happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine > > (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have > > ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running > > somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at > > all kernel-level). I thought it was related to new java libraries > > (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has > > changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s). > > Everything else in the system(s) is working fine. > >=20 > >=20 > > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D > >=20 > > I've done a full=20 > > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0=20 > > and dumped the text version of it at=20 > >=20 > > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614=20 > >=20 > > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but > > i cant figure out what it means or what's causing it. >=20 > I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_ > experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1). > Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and > try. I attached my pkg_info, please take a look. Hm, it seems that bzipped text file was unwelcome; here's the list again. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 --MP_JxU9DBH7Ck/pO/No3X0M2ms Content-Type: text/plain; name=installed-ports.txt Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=installed-ports.txt /var/db/pkg/DFileServer-1.1.3 /var/db/pkg/ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1 /var/db/pkg/Lila-xfwm4-0.3.1_4 /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_3 /var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.7_1 /var/db/pkg/Terminal-0.2.6_2 /var/db/pkg/Thunar-0.8.0_5 /var/db/pkg/Xaw3d-1.5E_2 /var/db/pkg/a2ps-a4-4.13b_4 /var/db/pkg/aMule-2.1.3_4 /var/db/pkg/aalib-1.4.r5_3 /var/db/pkg/acroread7-7.0.9_2,1 /var/db/pkg/acroreadwrapper-0.0.20060221_1 /var/db/pkg/adcomplain-3.52 /var/db/pkg/antiword-0.37_1 /var/db/pkg/appres-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/apr-db42-1.2.7_1 /var/db/pkg/apsfilter-7.2.8_1 /var/db/pkg/arc-5.21o_1 /var/db/pkg/arts-1.5.6_2,1 /var/db/pkg/aspell-0.60.5_2 /var/db/pkg/at-spi-1.18.1_1 /var/db/pkg/atk-1.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.13.000227_5 /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.53_3 /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.59_2 /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.61 /var/db/pkg/automake-1.10_2 /var/db/pkg/automake-1.4.6_3 /var/db/pkg/automake-1.5_3,1 /var/db/pkg/automake-1.9.6_1 /var/db/pkg/avahi-0.6.18_1 /var/db/pkg/bash-3.1.17 /var/db/pkg/bdftopcf-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/beforelight-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/bigreqsproto-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/bison-1.75_2,1 /var/db/pkg/bitmap-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/bitstream-vera-1.10_4 /var/db/pkg/boehm-gc-6.8 /var/db/pkg/bonk-0.6 /var/db/pkg/boost-1.33.1_2 /var/db/pkg/boost-python-1.33.1_2 /var/db/pkg/bsdtris-1.1 /var/db/pkg/bug-buddy-2.18.1_1 /var/db/pkg/ca-roots-1.2 /var/db/pkg/cabextract-1.2 /var/db/pkg/cairo-1.4.6_1 /var/db/pkg/cairomm-1.2.4_1 /var/db/pkg/cdparanoia-3.9.8_8 /var/db/pkg/cdrdao-1.2.1 /var/db/pkg/cdrtools-2.01_6 /var/db/pkg/claws-mail-2.9.2 /var/db/pkg/claws-mail-gtkhtml2_viewer-0.15_3 /var/db/pkg/claws-mail-mailmbox-1.13_5 /var/db/pkg/claws-mail-notification-0.10_3 /var/db/pkg/claws-mail-smime-0.7_5 /var/db/pkg/code2000-1.16_2 /var/db/pkg/compositeproto-0.3.1 /var/db/pkg/conky-1.4.5_1 /var/db/pkg/cppunit-1.10.2 /var/db/pkg/cscope-15.6 /var/db/pkg/ctags-5.6 /var/db/pkg/cups-base-1.2.10_1 /var/db/pkg/curl-7.16.1 /var/db/pkg/cvsup-16.1h_3 /var/db/pkg/damageproto-1.1.0_2 /var/db/pkg/db4-4.0.14_1,1 /var/db/pkg/db41-4.1.25_4 /var/db/pkg/db42-4.2.52_5 /var/db/pkg/dbh-4.5.0 /var/db/pkg/dbus-1.0.2_2 /var/db/pkg/dbus-glib-0.73_1 /var/db/pkg/dctc-0.84.1_1 /var/db/pkg/dctc-gui-0.66_5 /var/db/pkg/desktop-file-utils-0.12_1 /var/db/pkg/diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_5 /var/db/pkg/diablo-jre-1.5.0.07.01_5 /var/db/pkg/dillo-0.8.6_1 /var/db/pkg/dirmngr-0.9.7_2 /var/db/pkg/djbfft-0.76_2 /var/db/pkg/dmidecode-2.8 /var/db/pkg/dmxproto-2.2.2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-1.3 /var/db/pkg/docbook-241_2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-3.0_2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-3.1_2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-4.0_2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-4.1_2 /var/db/pkg/docbook-sk-4.1.2_4 /var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.2_1 /var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.3 /var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.4 /var/db/pkg/docbook-xsl-1.71.1_2 /var/db/pkg/dri-6.5.3_1,2 /var/db/pkg/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 /var/db/pkg/ecore-20070223_2,1 /var/db/pkg/edb-20070223,1 /var/db/pkg/editres-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/edje-20070223_2,1 /var/db/pkg/eet-20070223,1 /var/db/pkg/eject-1.5_2 /var/db/pkg/ekiga-2.0.4_2 /var/db/pkg/emacs-21.3_10 /var/db/pkg/embryo-20070223_1,1 /var/db/pkg/enchant-1.3.0 /var/db/pkg/encodings-1.0.2,1 /var/db/pkg/enlightenment-20070223_1,1 /var/db/pkg/enscript-a4-1.6.4_1 /var/db/pkg/eog-2.18.2 /var/db/pkg/epdfview-0.1.6_2 /var/db/pkg/esound-0.2.38 /var/db/pkg/evas-20070223_2,1 /var/db/pkg/evieext-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/evolution-data-server-1.10.2 /var/db/pkg/expat-2.0.0_1 /var/db/pkg/faac-1.25 /var/db/pkg/faad2-2.5,1 /var/db/pkg/faces-1.7.7_8 /var/db/pkg/fetchmail-6.3.8_1 /var/db/pkg/ffcall-1.10_1 /var/db/pkg/fftw3-3.1.2 /var/db/pkg/firefox-2.0.0.4,1 /var/db/pkg/firefox-i18n-2.0.0.4 /var/db/pkg/fixesproto-4.0 /var/db/pkg/flac-1.1.2_1 /var/db/pkg/flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13_1 /var/db/pkg/fltk-1.1.7_3 /var/db/pkg/font-adobe-100dpi-1.0.0_1 /var/db/pkg/font-adobe-75dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-adobe-utopia-100dpi-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-adobe-utopia-75dpi-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-adobe-utopia-type1-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-alias-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-arabic-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-100dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-75dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-ttf-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bh-type1-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bitstream-100dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bitstream-75dpi-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-bitstream-type1-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-cronyx-cyrillic-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-cursor-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-daewoo-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-dec-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-ibm-type1-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-isas-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-jis-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-micro-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-misc-cyrillic-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-misc-meltho-1.0.0_1 /var/db/pkg/font-misc-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-mutt-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-schumacher-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-screen-cyrillic-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-sony-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-sun-misc-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-util-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/font-winitzki-cyrillic-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/font-xfree86-type1-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/fontcacheproto-0.1.2 /var/db/pkg/fontconfig-2.4.2_2,1 /var/db/pkg/fontforge-20060822_1 /var/db/pkg/fontsproto-2.0.2 /var/db/pkg/fonttosfnt-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/freebsd-games-5.1.1_7 /var/db/pkg/freeciv-gtk2-2.0.8_3 /var/db/pkg/freetype2-2.2.1_2 /var/db/pkg/freeze-2.5_2 /var/db/pkg/fribidi-0.10.8 /var/db/pkg/fslsfonts-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/fstobdf-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/fvwm-imlib-2.4.20_1 /var/db/pkg/gail-1.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/galculator-1.2.5.2_2 /var/db/pkg/gamin-0.1.8_1 /var/db/pkg/gawk-3.1.5_1 /var/db/pkg/gcalctool-5.9.14_1,2 /var/db/pkg/gccmakedep-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/gconf-editor-2.18.0_1,1 /var/db/pkg/gconf2-2.18.0.1_1 /var/db/pkg/gconfmm-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/gd-2.0.34_1,1 /var/db/pkg/gdbm-1.8.3_3 /var/db/pkg/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_6 /var/db/pkg/gettext-0.16.1_3 /var/db/pkg/gftp-gnome-2.0.18_4 /var/db/pkg/ghostscript-gpl-8.57 /var/db/pkg/gimageview-imlib-0.2.27_3 /var/db/pkg/gimp-2.2_1,2 /var/db/pkg/gimp-app-2.2.14_1,1 /var/db/pkg/gimp-gutenprint-5.1.0_1 /var/db/pkg/gle-3.1.0_1 /var/db/pkg/glib-1.2.10_12 /var/db/pkg/glib-2.12.12_2 /var/db/pkg/glibmm-2.12.9,1 /var/db/pkg/glproto-1.4.8 /var/db/pkg/gmake-3.81_2 /var/db/pkg/gmencoder-0.1.0_8 /var/db/pkg/gmime-2.2.9 /var/db/pkg/gnome-audio-2.0.0_2 /var/db/pkg/gnome-backgrounds-2.16.2_2 /var/db/pkg/gnome-desktop-2.18.2 /var/db/pkg/gnome-doc-utils-0.10.3_1 /var/db/pkg/gnome-icon-theme-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/gnome-keyring-0.8.1_1 /var/db/pkg/gnome-libs-1.4.2_7 /var/db/pkg/gnome-mag-0.14.4 /var/db/pkg/gnome-menus-2.18.2 /var/db/pkg/gnome-mime-data-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/gnome-themes-2.18.1_1 /var/db/pkg/gnome-vfs-2.18.1_2 /var/db/pkg/gnome_subr-1.0 /var/db/pkg/gnomehier-2.2_2 /var/db/pkg/gnomoradio-0.15.1_6 /var/db/pkg/gnu-autoconf-2.61 /var/db/pkg/gnupg-2.0.3 /var/db/pkg/gnutls-1.6.2 /var/db/pkg/gpdf-2.10.0_6 /var/db/pkg/gpgme-1.1.3_3 /var/db/pkg/gqview-2.0.4_1 /var/db/pkg/grip-3.2.0_14 /var/db/pkg/gsfonts-8.11_4 /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-0.10.13 /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-plugins-0.10.13,3 /var/db/pkg/gtar-1.16.1 /var/db/pkg/gtk-1.2.10_18 /var/db/pkg/gtk-2.10.12_2 /var/db/pkg/gtk-doc-1.8_1 /var/db/pkg/gtk-engines2-2.10.2 /var/db/pkg/gtk-gnutella-0.96.3_4 /var/db/pkg/gtk-xfce-engine-2.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/gtkglext-1.2.0_1 /var/db/pkg/gtkhtml3-3.14.2 /var/db/pkg/gtkmm-2.10.10_1 /var/db/pkg/gtksourceview-1.8.5_1 /var/db/pkg/gtkspell-2.0.11_5 /var/db/pkg/gucharmap-gnome-1.10.0_1 /var/db/pkg/guile-1.6.8_3 /var/db/pkg/gutenprint-base-5.1.0_2 /var/db/pkg/gv-3.6.2_1 /var/db/pkg/hal-0.5.8.20070403_2 /var/db/pkg/help2man-1.36.4_1 /var/db/pkg/hicolor-icon-theme-0.10_2 /var/db/pkg/hpijs-2.1.4_1 /var/db/pkg/html2ps-A4-1.0.b5_1,1 /var/db/pkg/htmldoc-1.8.27_3 /var/db/pkg/hyperestraier-1.4.10 /var/db/pkg/iceauth-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/ico-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/icon-naming-utils-0.8.2 /var/db/pkg/id3lib-3.8.3_3 /var/db/pkg/imake-1.0.2_4,1 /var/db/pkg/imlib-1.9.15_5 /var/db/pkg/imlib2-20070223_1,1 /var/db/pkg/inkscape-0.45_5 /var/db/pkg/inputproto-1.3.2 /var/db/pkg/intltool-0.35.5_2 /var/db/pkg/iroffer-1.4.3 /var/db/pkg/iso-codes-0.58_2 /var/db/pkg/iso8879-1986_2 /var/db/pkg/ispell-3.2.06_18 /var/db/pkg/ja-scim-tables-0.5.7_1 /var/db/pkg/jackit-0.103.0 /var/db/pkg/jade-1.2.1_9 /var/db/pkg/jasper-1.900.1 /var/db/pkg/javavmwrapper-2.3 /var/db/pkg/jbigkit-1.6 /var/db/pkg/jpeg-6b_4 /var/db/pkg/kazehakase-0.4.5_1 /var/db/pkg/kbproto-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/kexis-0.2.2 /var/db/pkg/lame-3.97_1 /var/db/pkg/laudio-0.4 /var/db/pkg/lcms-1.16_1,1 /var/db/pkg/lha-1.14i_6 /var/db/pkg/libFS-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/libGL-6.5.3_2 /var/db/pkg/libGLU-6.5.3 /var/db/pkg/libICE-1.0.3,1 /var/db/pkg/libIDL-0.8.8 /var/db/pkg/libSM-1.0.2,1 /var/db/pkg/libX11-1.1.2,1 /var/db/pkg/libXScrnSaver-1.1.2 /var/db/pkg/libXTrap-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/libXau-1.0.3_2 /var/db/pkg/libXaw-1.0.2,1 /var/db/pkg/libXcomposite-0.3.1,1 /var/db/pkg/libXcursor-1.1.8_1 /var/db/pkg/libXdamage-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/libXdmcp-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/libXevie-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/libXext-1.0.3,1 /var/db/pkg/libXfixes-4.0.3 /var/db/pkg/libXfont-1.2.8,1 /var/db/pkg/libXfontcache-1.0.4 /var/db/pkg/libXft-2.1.12 /var/db/pkg/libXi-1.0.2,1 /var/db/pkg/libXinerama-1.0.1,1 /var/db/pkg/libXmu-1.0.3,1 /var/db/pkg/libXp-1.0.0,1 /var/db/pkg/libXpm-3.5.6_1 /var/db/pkg/libXprintAppUtil-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libXprintUtil-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libXrandr-1.2.1 /var/db/pkg/libXrender-0.9.2 /var/db/pkg/libXres-1.0.3_1 /var/db/pkg/libXt-1.0.5 /var/db/pkg/libXtst-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libXv-1.0.3,1 /var/db/pkg/libXvMC-1.0.4 /var/db/pkg/libXxf86dga-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libXxf86misc-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libXxf86vm-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/liba52-0.7.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libao-esound-0.8.5_5 /var/db/pkg/libart_lgpl-2.3.19,1 /var/db/pkg/libassuan-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libaudiofile-0.2.6 /var/db/pkg/libbonobo-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libbonoboui-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libcdaudio-0.99.12p2_1 /var/db/pkg/libcddb-1.3.0 /var/db/pkg/libcdio-0.77_2 /var/db/pkg/libcroco-0.6.1 /var/db/pkg/libdaemon-0.10_1 /var/db/pkg/libdca-0.0.5 /var/db/pkg/libdmx-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/libdrm-2.3.0 /var/db/pkg/libdvdcss-1.2.9_2 /var/db/pkg/libdvdnav-0.1.10_2 /var/db/pkg/libdvdread-0.9.7_2 /var/db/pkg/libetpan-0.49_1 /var/db/pkg/libexif-0.6.15 /var/db/pkg/libexo-0.3.2_3 /var/db/pkg/libfame-0.9.1_2 /var/db/pkg/libflash-0.4.13_2 /var/db/pkg/libfontenc-1.0.4 /var/db/pkg/libfpx-1.2.0.12 /var/db/pkg/libgcrypt-1.2.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libgksu-1.3.8_1 /var/db/pkg/libgksuui-1.0.7_2 /var/db/pkg/libglade2-2.6.0_3 /var/db/pkg/libglut-6.5.2_1 /var/db/pkg/libgmp-4.2.1_2 /var/db/pkg/libgnome-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libgnomecanvas-2.14.0_3 /var/db/pkg/libgnomecups-0.2.2_3,1 /var/db/pkg/libgnomeprint-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libgnomeprintui-2.18.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libgnomeui-2.18.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libgpg-error-1.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libgsf-1.14.3_1 /var/db/pkg/libgtkhtml-2.11.0_3 /var/db/pkg/libgtop-2.14.9 /var/db/pkg/libical-0.24_3 /var/db/pkg/libiconv-1.9.2_2 /var/db/pkg/libid3tag-0.15.1b /var/db/pkg/libidn-0.6.14 /var/db/pkg/libijs-0.35_1 /var/db/pkg/libksba-1.0.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libltdl-1.5.22_2 /var/db/pkg/libmad-0.15.1b_2 /var/db/pkg/libmikmod-esound-3.1.11_2 /var/db/pkg/libmng-1.0.9 /var/db/pkg/libmodplug-0.8.4 /var/db/pkg/libmpcdec-1.2.6 /var/db/pkg/libmpeg2-0.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libmspack-0.0.20040308_3 /var/db/pkg/libmusicbrainz-2.1.5 /var/db/pkg/libnotify-0.4.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libogg-1.1.3,3 /var/db/pkg/liboggz-0.9.5 /var/db/pkg/liboil-0.3.12 /var/db/pkg/liboldX-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/libotf-0.9.5_1 /var/db/pkg/librsvg2-2.16.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libsamplerate-0.1.2_2 /var/db/pkg/libsexy-0.1.10_1 /var/db/pkg/libsigc++-2.0.17_1 /var/db/pkg/libslang-1.4.9 /var/db/pkg/libsndfile-1.0.17 /var/db/pkg/libsoup-2.2.100 /var/db/pkg/libstrfunc-8.3 /var/db/pkg/libsvg-0.1.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libsvg-cairo-0.1.6_3 /var/db/pkg/libtasn1-0.3.10 /var/db/pkg/libthai-0.1.5_1 /var/db/pkg/libtheora-1.0.a7 /var/db/pkg/libtool-1.5.22_4 /var/db/pkg/libungif-4.1.4_3 /var/db/pkg/libuninameslist-20050712 /var/db/pkg/libusb-0.1.12_1 /var/db/pkg/libvolume_id-0.75.0_1 /var/db/pkg/libvorbis-1.1.2,3 /var/db/pkg/libwmf-0.2.8.4_1 /var/db/pkg/libwnck-2.18.2 /var/db/pkg/libwpd-0.8.9_1 /var/db/pkg/libxfce4gui-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libxfce4mcs-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/libxfce4util-4.4.1 /var/db/pkg/libxine-1.1.4_6 /var/db/pkg/libxkbfile-1.0.4 /var/db/pkg/libxkbui-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/libxklavier-3.2_2,1 /var/db/pkg/libxml++-2.18.0 /var/db/pkg/libxml-1.8.17_4 /var/db/pkg/libxml2-2.6.27 /var/db/pkg/libxslt-1.1.20 /var/db/pkg/lighttpd-1.4.15 /var/db/pkg/linc-1.0.3_6 /var/db/pkg/links-2.1.p21_1,1 /var/db/pkg/linux-aspell-0.50.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/linux-atk-1.9.1 /var/db/pkg/linux-expat-1.95.8 /var/db/pkg/linux-flashplugin-7.0r69 /var/db/pkg/linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_7 /var/db/pkg/linux-glib2-2.6.6 /var/db/pkg/linux-gtk2-2.6.10 /var/db/pkg/linux-jpeg-6b.34 /var/db/pkg/linux-openssl-0.9.7f /var/db/pkg/linux-opera-9.21.20070510 /var/db/pkg/linux-pango-1.8.1 /var/db/pkg/linux-png-1.2.8_2 /var/db/pkg/linux-realplayer-10.0.8.805.20060718_1 /var/db/pkg/linux-tiff-3.7.1 /var/db/pkg/linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_5 /var/db/pkg/linux_base-fc-4_9 /var/db/pkg/linux_dri-6.5 /var/db/pkg/linuxdoc-1.1_1 /var/db/pkg/linuxthreads-2.2.3_22 /var/db/pkg/listres-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/lpac-1.40 /var/db/pkg/lrzsz-0.12.20_1 /var/db/pkg/ltmdm-1.4_18 /var/db/pkg/luit-1.0.2_2 /var/db/pkg/lynx-2.8.6_5,1 /var/db/pkg/lzo2-2.02_1 /var/db/pkg/lzop-1.02.r1 /var/db/pkg/m17n-db-1.3.3_1 /var/db/pkg/m17n-lib-1.3.3_1 /var/db/pkg/m4-1.4.9 /var/db/pkg/mDNSResponder-108 /var/db/pkg/mac-3.99.4.5 /var/db/pkg/makedepend-1.0.0,1 /var/db/pkg/metacity-2.18.3 /var/db/pkg/mgv-3.1.5_1 /var/db/pkg/mime-support-3.39.1 /var/db/pkg/minicom-2.1 /var/db/pkg/mkcomposecache-1.2_1 /var/db/pkg/mkfontdir-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/mkfontscale-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/mousepad-0.2.12_2 /var/db/pkg/mozplugger-1.7.3_2 /var/db/pkg/mpage-2.5.5 /var/db/pkg/mpeg2codec-1.2_2 /var/db/pkg/mpeg4ip-libmp4v2-1.5.0.1 /var/db/pkg/mpg123-0.59r_17 /var/db/pkg/mpg321-0.2.10_6 /var/db/pkg/mplayer-0.99.10_10 /var/db/pkg/mplayer-skins-1.1.2_6 /var/db/pkg/mplayerplug-in-3.40_1 /var/db/pkg/mtools-3.9.10_1 /var/db/pkg/musepack-1.15v /var/db/pkg/mutt-1.4.2.3 /var/db/pkg/nas-1.8_1 /var/db/pkg/nasm-0.98.39,1 /var/db/pkg/neon-0.26.3 /var/db/pkg/net-snmp-5.3.1_3 /var/db/pkg/netatalk-2.0.3_4,1 /var/db/pkg/netpbm-10.26.42 /var/db/pkg/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4_2 /var/db/pkg/nspr-4.6.6 /var/db/pkg/nss-3.11.5 /var/db/pkg/oclock-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/opal-2.2.4_1 /var/db/pkg/open-motif-2.2.3_3 /var/db/pkg/openldap-client-2.3.35_1 /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-2.2.0_1 /var/db/pkg/optimfrog-4.520.b1 /var/db/pkg/orage-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Audio-FLAC-Header-1.7 /var/db/pkg/p5-Audio-Musepack-0.7 /var/db/pkg/p5-Audio-WMA-1.1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Authen-SASL-2.10_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.004 /var/db/pkg/p5-Compress-Zlib-2.004 /var/db/pkg/p5-Date-Manip-5.44 /var/db/pkg/p5-Digest-1.15 /var/db/pkg/p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 /var/db/pkg/p5-Digest-MD5-2.36 /var/db/pkg/p5-Digest-SHA1-2.11 /var/db/pkg/p5-GSSAPI-0.24 /var/db/pkg/p5-HTML-Parser-3.56 /var/db/pkg/p5-HTML-Tagset-3.10 /var/db/pkg/p5-HTML-Tree-3.23 /var/db/pkg/p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.004 /var/db/pkg/p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.004 /var/db/pkg/p5-Inline-0.44 /var/db/pkg/p5-MIME-Base64-3.07 /var/db/pkg/p5-MP3-Info-1.22 /var/db/pkg/p5-MP3-Tag-0.9709 /var/db/pkg/p5-MP4-Info-1.11 /var/db/pkg/p5-Net-1.20_1,1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Net-DBus-0.33.4_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03 /var/db/pkg/p5-Parse-RecDescent-1.94 /var/db/pkg/p5-Parse-Yapp-1.05 /var/db/pkg/p5-Text-Balanced-2.0.0_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-Text-Iconv-1.4 /var/db/pkg/p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 /var/db/pkg/p5-Time-HiRes-1.9707,1 /var/db/pkg/p5-URI-1.35 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-DOM-1.44 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Filter-BufferText-1.01 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Grove-0.46.a /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Handler-YAWriter-0.23 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-LibXML-Common-0.13 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-NamespaceSupport-1.09_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Parser-2.34_2 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-RegExp-0.03 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-SAX-0.15 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-SAX-Expat-0.38 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-SAX-Writer-0.50 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Simple-2.16_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-Twig-3.29 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-XPath-1.13 /var/db/pkg/p5-XML-XQL-0.68 /var/db/pkg/p5-gettext-1.05_1 /var/db/pkg/p5-libwww-5.805 /var/db/pkg/p5-libxml-0.08 /var/db/pkg/p5-version-0.72.03 /var/db/pkg/pango-1.16.4_1 /var/db/pkg/pccts-1.33.33 /var/db/pkg/pciids-20070528 /var/db/pkg/pcre-7.1 /var/db/pkg/perl-5.8.8 /var/db/pkg/pkg-config-0.21 /var/db/pkg/pkg_cutleaves-20061113 /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /var/db/pkg/png-1.2.18 /var/db/pkg/policykit-0.1.20060514_4 /var/db/pkg/poppler-0.5.4_3 /var/db/pkg/poppler-data-0.1 /var/db/pkg/poppler-gtk-0.5.4_2 /var/db/pkg/popt-1.7_4 /var/db/pkg/portaudio-18.1_2 /var/db/pkg/portaudit-0.5.11 /var/db/pkg/portconf-1.2 /var/db/pkg/portmanager-0.4.1_9 /var/db/pkg/portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5 /var/db/pkg/poster-1.0 /var/db/pkg/printproto-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/psutils-a4-1.17_2 /var/db/pkg/pth-2.0.7 /var/db/pkg/pure-ftpd-1.0.21_1 /var/db/pkg/pwlib-1.10.3_1,1 /var/db/pkg/py24-cairo-1.4.0_1 /var/db/pkg/py24-chardet-1.0_3 /var/db/pkg/py24-feedparser-4.1_2 /var/db/pkg/py24-gnome-2.18.2_1 /var/db/pkg/py24-gobject-2.12.3 /var/db/pkg/py24-gtk-2.10.4_1 /var/db/pkg/py24-imaging-1.1.6_2 /var/db/pkg/py24-libxml2-2.6.27 /var/db/pkg/py24-mutagen-1.11 /var/db/pkg/py24-numeric-24.2 /var/db/pkg/py24-orbit-2.14.3 /var/db/pkg/py24-reportlab-1.21.1 /var/db/pkg/py24-tkinter-2.4.4_2 /var/db/pkg/py24-xml-0.8.4 /var/db/pkg/pyrex-0.9.5.1a /var/db/pkg/python24-2.4.4 /var/db/pkg/qdbm-1.8.75 /var/db/pkg/qt-3.3.8_3 /var/db/pkg/randrproto-1.2.1 /var/db/pkg/recode-3.6_6 /var/db/pkg/recordproto-1.13.2 /var/db/pkg/renderproto-0.9.2 /var/db/pkg/resourceproto-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/rgb-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/rpm-3.0.6_13 /var/db/pkg/rpm2cpio-1.2_2 /var/db/pkg/rstart-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/rsync-2.6.9 /var/db/pkg/ruby-1.8.6,1 /var/db/pkg/ruby18-bdb-0.6.0 /var/db/pkg/rxvt-2.6.4_3 /var/db/pkg/samba-libsmbclient-3.0.25a /var/db/pkg/scim-1.4.6_1 /var/db/pkg/scim-table-imengine-0.5.7_1 /var/db/pkg/scripts-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/scrnsaverproto-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/scrollkeeper-0.3.14_8,1 /var/db/pkg/sdl-1.2.11_1,2 /var/db/pkg/sdocbook-xml-1.1,1 /var/db/pkg/sessreg-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/setxkbmap-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/sgmlformat-1.7_2 /var/db/pkg/shared-mime-info-0.21_3 /var/db/pkg/shorten-3.6.0 /var/db/pkg/showfont-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/skencil-0.6.17_1 /var/db/pkg/skype-1.2.0.18_4 /var/db/pkg/slim-1.2.6_2 /var/db/pkg/smproxy-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/sox-12.18.2 /var/db/pkg/speex-1.2.b1_1,1 /var/db/pkg/spidermonkey-1.5_3 /var/db/pkg/sqlite3-3.3.17 /var/db/pkg/startup-notification-0.9_1 /var/db/pkg/subversion-1.4.3_2 /var/db/pkg/sudo-1.6.8.12_2 /var/db/pkg/svgalib-1.4.3_5 /var/db/pkg/system-tools-backends-2.2.1_3 /var/db/pkg/t1lib-5.1.1_1,1 /var/db/pkg/taglib-1.4_2 /var/db/pkg/tagtool-0.12.3_1 /var/db/pkg/tcl-8.4.15_2,1 /var/db/pkg/tgif-nls-4.1.45_1 /var/db/pkg/thunar-media-tags-plugin-0.1.2_1 /var/db/pkg/thunar-volman-0.1.2_1 /var/db/pkg/tiff-3.8.2_1 /var/db/pkg/tk-8.4.15_2,2 /var/db/pkg/transfig-3.2.5 /var/db/pkg/trapproto-3.4.3 /var/db/pkg/tta-3.3 /var/db/pkg/ttmkfdir-3.0.9_1,1 /var/db/pkg/twm-1.0.3_3 /var/db/pkg/unace-1.2b_2 /var/db/pkg/unarj-2.65_2 /var/db/pkg/unrar-3.70,4 /var/db/pkg/unzip-5.52_3 /var/db/pkg/urlview-0.9_2 /var/db/pkg/v4l_compat-1.0.20060801 /var/db/pkg/vcdimager-0.7.23_3 /var/db/pkg/videoproto-2.2.2 /var/db/pkg/viewres-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/vim-7.0.224_1 /var/db/pkg/vorbis-tools-1.1.1_3,3 /var/db/pkg/vte-0.16.5 /var/db/pkg/wavpack-4.40.0 /var/db/pkg/wavplay-1.4_2 /var/db/pkg/weblint-1.020 /var/db/pkg/wget-1.10.2_1 /var/db/pkg/win32-codecs-3.1.0.r1,1 /var/db/pkg/windowmaker-0.92.0_3 /var/db/pkg/wmicons-1.0_1 /var/db/pkg/wv2-0.2.3_1 /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.0_1 /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-unicode-2.8.0_1 /var/db/pkg/x11perf-1.4.1 /var/db/pkg/xauth-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xbiff-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xbitmaps-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xcalc-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xcdroast-0.98.a.15_8 /var/db/pkg/xchat-2.8.2_2 /var/db/pkg/xclipboard-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xclock-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xcmiscproto-1.1.2 /var/db/pkg/xcmsdb-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xconsole-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xcursor-themes-1.0.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xcursorgen-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xdbedizzy-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xditview-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xdm-1.1.4_2 /var/db/pkg/xdpyinfo-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xdriinfo-1.0.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xedit-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xev-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xextproto-7.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xeyes-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-acecad-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-calcomp-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-citron-2.2.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-digitaledge-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-dmc-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-dynapro-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-elo2300-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-elographics-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-fpit-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-hyperpen-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-jamstudio-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-joystick-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-keyboard-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-magellan-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-magictouch-1.0.0.5_1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-microtouch-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-mouse-1.1.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-mutouch-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-palmax-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-penmount-1.2.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-spaceorb-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-summa-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-tek4957-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-input-void-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-apm-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-ark-0.6.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3_2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-chips-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-cirrus-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-cyrix-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-dummy-0.2.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-fbdev-0.3.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-glint-1.1.1_2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-i128-1.2.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-i740-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-i810-1.6.5_2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-imstt-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-mga-1.4.6.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-neomagic-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-newport-0.2.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-nsc-2.8.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-nv-1.2.2.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-rendition-4.1.3 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-s3-0.5.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-s3virge-1.9.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-savage-2.1.2_2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-siliconmotion-1.4.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-sis-0.9.3_1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-tdfx-1.3.0_1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-tga-1.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-trident-1.2.3 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-tseng-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-vesa-1.3.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-vga-4.1.0 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-via-0.2.2_1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-vmware-10.14.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86-video-voodoo-1.1.1 /var/db/pkg/xf86bigfontproto-1.1.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86dga-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86dgaproto-2.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86driproto-2.0.3 /var/db/pkg/xf86miscproto-0.9.2 /var/db/pkg/xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2 /var/db/pkg/xfce-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-appfinder-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-artwork-0.0.4_7 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-desktop-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-icon-theme-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.0.1_2 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-mcs-manager-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-mixer-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.4.0_3 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-panel-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-print-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-screenshooter-plugin-1.0.0_2 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-session-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-timer-plugin-0.5.1_2 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-utils-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-wm-4.4.1_1 /var/db/pkg/xfce4-wm-themes-4.4.1 /var/db/pkg/xfd-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xfindproxy-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xfontsel-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xforms-1.0_4,1 /var/db/pkg/xfs-1.0.4_3,1 /var/db/pkg/xfsinfo-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xfwp-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xgamma-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xgc-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xhost-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xine-0.99.4_10 /var/db/pkg/xineramaproto-1.1.2 /var/db/pkg/xinit-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/xkbcomp-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/xkbevd-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xkbprint-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xkbutils-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xkeyboard-config-0.9_3 /var/db/pkg/xkill-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xload-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xlogo-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xlsatoms-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xlsclients-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xlsfonts-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xmag-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xman-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xmessage-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xmh-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xmlcatmgr-2.2 /var/db/pkg/xmms-1.2.10_8 /var/db/pkg/xmms-cdread-0.14a_4 /var/db/pkg/xmms-crossfade-0.3.12_1 /var/db/pkg/xmms-jack-0.17_1 /var/db/pkg/xmms-musepack-1.8.0_3 /var/db/pkg/xmodmap-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xmore-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-apps-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-cf-files-1.0.2_2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-docs-1.3,1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-drivers-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-cyrillic-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-truetype-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-fonts-type1-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-libraries-7.2_1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-nestserver-1.2.0,1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-printserver-1.2.0,1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-protos-7.2 /var/db/pkg/xorg-server-1.2.0_2,1 /var/db/pkg/xorg-vfbserver-1.2.0,1 /var/db/pkg/xpdf-3.02_1 /var/db/pkg/xphelloworld-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xpi-locale-switcher-2.0 /var/db/pkg/xpi-quick-locale-switcher-1.6.1 /var/db/pkg/xplsprinters-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xpr-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xprehashprinterlist-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xprop-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xproto-7.0.10 /var/db/pkg/xrandr-1.2.0 /var/db/pkg/xrdb-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/xrefresh-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xrx-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xset-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xsetmode-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/xsetpointer-1.0.0 /var/db/pkg/xsetroot-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xsm-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xstdcmap-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xterm-225_1 /var/db/pkg/xtrans-1.0.3 /var/db/pkg/xtrap-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xv-3.10a_7 /var/db/pkg/xvid-1.1.2,1 /var/db/pkg/xvidtune-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xview-3.2.1_7 /var/db/pkg/xvinfo-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xwd-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/xwininfo-1.0.2 /var/db/pkg/xwud-1.0.1 /var/db/pkg/yelp-2.18.1_1 /var/db/pkg/zenity-2.18.2 /var/db/pkg/zip-2.32 /var/db/pkg/zoo-2.10.1_2 --MP_JxU9DBH7Ck/pO/No3X0M2ms-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:31:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38E816A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A2313C48C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:51:01 -0400 id 00056410.46702E85.000004B3 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 12:51:00 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Jack Jordan In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:51:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1181757060.1161.39.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port x-pineapp-mail-mail-from: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com x-pineapp-mail-rcpt-to: jordanja@cox.net Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free Bsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:31:03 -0000 Boot off of the CD1. Erase ubuntu from the disk using a harsh and abrasive solvent like bleach. ~~BAS On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0500, Jack Jordan wrote: > I purchased a copy of this software. what is the installation command line > for opening disk#1,2,&Ubunto > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:58:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D2C16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-defer01.adhost.com (mail-defer01.adhost.com [216.211.128.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4902913C458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:58:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in08.adhost.com (mail-in08.adhost.com [10.211.128.141]) by mail-defer01.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A54EE827 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:13:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in08.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE61D8FC51 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:13:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:14:05 -0700 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Ethernet Card Limitations to Number of Connections? Thread-Index: Acet3j8DOaHkiIlXScCNOHfj9TFgQA== From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: Cc: Subject: Ethernet Card Limitations to Number of Connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:58:47 -0000 Hello All: Are there any physical limitations to the number of connections (TCP/UDP) that are determined by the physical interface itself? We have a PF load-balancing solution in place in front of a large number of mail servers and we're considering using the same boxes to front our Name Server/Name Resolvers. I'm concerned that the single uplink port on the PF box will be overloaded with the number of connections. Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:08:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFADB16A46B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D9913C458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-71-64-129-15.woh.res.rr.com [71.64.129.15]) by ms-smtp-02.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l5DJ8CKf013500 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:08:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002501c7adee$30418350$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:08:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: sftp and tab completion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:08:15 -0000 Hello, I've got a simple question. Does sftp, the one that comes with FreeBSD 6.2's openssh, do tab completion? I've read that it could, but it isn't working here. I've got bash3 set up as my shell which seemed to matter. Also, when hitting a backspace in sftp i get a ^h and the command is invalidated as a result. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:14:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033F716A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6756613C468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 19:13:59 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp046) with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 21:13:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19vjv9egi9vmqIb3Q8RXWHrMBjAMJ3lIL8IuxTc+I BfuEXWi9YeY8sO Message-ID: <467041F0.4040301@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070603) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions ML Subject: Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:14:01 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > Hi all, > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done: > > - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds) > - Calc dies right away > - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, if opening didnt crash)... v strange. > > What may be : > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems at all. > Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. > My account using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). > I haven't got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with. > > What is not (i think) : > I've built the whole thing locally (sigh) , but the same thing happens. I've tested the locally built package on another machine (also using xfce4.4) and the same thing happens. Both machines have ATI cards and are up to date in all their packages. Both are running somewhat modified kernels based on 6.2-STABLE (with no problems at all kernel-level). > I thought it was related to new java libraries (refuted), glibmm update (refuted). I can't think what else has changed between last night and this morning in my computer(s). Everything else in the system(s) is working fine. > > > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D > > I've done a full > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 > and dumped the text version of it at > > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 > > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i cant figure out what it means or what's causing it. > > Any clues, anyone? :) > thanks!! Try setting OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP to kde or none. This seems to be a GTK related issue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:21:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0FB16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E9A13C4B8 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4BE8C02AE; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1ECD829C003; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-a0022bb000000a23-3c-4670439c1cd6 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 1131D30400B; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> References: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <68F60D1E-2344-4140-B8E1-056947452C1F@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:20:59 -0700 To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet Card Limitations to Number of Connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:21:00 -0000 On Jun 13, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Are there any physical limitations to the number of connections > (TCP/UDP) that are determined by the physical interface itself? Sure. Divide the interface speed by the size of the smallest packets one can send including ethernet preamble, all headers, and the minimal gap between frames. There's a PDF here with all of the details: ftp://ftp.cs.princeton.edu/techreports/2002/645.pdf ...but for 100Mbs full-duplex, you can send up to ~150 Kpps of minimum-size packets, or ~8 Kpps for max-sized packets. > We have a PF load-balancing solution in place in front of a large > number of mail > servers and we're considering using the same boxes to front our Name > Server/Name Resolvers. I'm concerned that the single uplink port > on the > PF box will be overloaded with the number of connections. > > Any insights would be greatly appreciated. One hopes that your "large number of mail servers" are only sending email to people who have actually opted in and wish to receive such email...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:29:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EADB16A46D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50C413C468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00815EBC7F; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:29:57 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" Message-Id: <20070613152957.c0562886.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> References: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet Card Limitations to Number of Connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:29:59 -0000 In response to "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" : > Hello All: > > Are there any physical limitations to the number of connections > (TCP/UDP) that are determined by the physical interface itself? We have > a PF load-balancing solution in place in front of a large number of mail > servers and we're considering using the same boxes to front our Name > Server/Name Resolvers. I'm concerned that the single uplink port on the > PF box will be overloaded with the number of connections. A single ethernet card is going to be limited by available bandwidth, and knows nothing about connections. As long as you've got enough bandwidth on the card to handle the traffic, the physical card will be fine. A single IP address is limited to ~65,000 connections due to the nature of IP networks. You can put multiple IPs on a single NIC and increase that if you need to, but configuring it can be a challenge. Hope that answers your question. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:36:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18D016A46B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AAF13C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6517D51925 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:36:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:36:53 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613213653.034884b5@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070613152957.c0562886.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D52031602171721@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> <20070613152957.c0562886.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Ethernet Card Limitations to Number of Connections? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:36:57 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:29:57 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: fine. > > A single IP address is limited to ~65,000 connections Just to clarify, that's a limitation on outgoing connections, rather than all connections. >due to the nature of IP networks. I think it's more of a stack implementation issue, I don't think there's any intrinsic reason why two outgoing connections couldn't share the same port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:00:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1931E16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BA913C44B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so341471mue for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:00:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hBj3QKVLlPBOIgjgbVj/pb6gncXrrK0Tc/eUKPQvxpRfw0CVdgvErbwF0YUocxWwUTrn3AXfQOVR4SkDr0mTtiMCoXDQfK+skI+DugWdb+90mCuOVjW/2X3K5kKzRHj2fal8d829orCeD0jOQfmx3zOFZ8uN3PM9765i0a+nlkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YVbYiWiSljzQlE8VdSkJQH0I/dbTQ91srGUaaiAshVSvaCDebfkcIGFubzxSJvKux1GxysS5AswBihIgsisMr320H1bq3wO1KASrYBF4zUaaDBXvN8TRvpG9xXBAzsNP/UFHXLbLn3xUzWSOD7WVZ14eS3cEYbriuRXcmHS2GEU= Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr1921251bud.1181768418030; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:00:17 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Andrew Falanga" In-Reply-To: <340a29540706130625l4fefdac5ke1d88783e459ab92@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> <340a29540706130625l4fefdac5ke1d88783e459ab92@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:00:20 -0000 On 13/06/07, Andrew Falanga wrote: > On 6/12/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > On 12/06/07, Andrew Falanga wrote: > > First off, my apologies to the group. I think I've been hitting > "reply" only and not "reply-to-all". > > > > > > > > > If the compiler (cc) dies with a 'fatal signal 11', you could have a > > > > memory problem. See e.g. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/faqs/GCC-SIG11-FAQ > > > > > > > > Roland > > > > > > Ok, while researching these things I found this. Does FreeBSD have a > > > work around? > > > > > > http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html > > > > > > This machine I'm having problems with is an AMD K6. > > > > A K6-700? Without doing too much > > flabulous research, I believe the K6 > > stopped at 300MHz. A 700 would be > > a K6-III, which would not have the > > 32MB problem. Flaky and heat-sen- > > sitive they are indeed. And there is > > a lot of junk 133 memory out there > > too. > > > > Based on my limited experience, about > > 60% of the time you can run 100MHz > > memory at 133MHz. If not you may have > > to rejumper your bus-speed to 100. > > If you are further unlucky the board > > won't have a 7:1 multiplier and you'll > > be stuck underclocking pretty seriously. > > > > What is a 7:1 multiplier? > The CPU on basically every x86 machine after the original pentium runs faster than the bus (or memory) speed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Side_Bus The board will probably have jumpers (though sometimes boards this old will have bios options) to select Front Side Bus speed (typically 33, 50, 60, 66, 75, 100, 120, and 133MHz on a machine of this age) and a second set of jumpers to select the CPU multiplier. An old K6-III 450MHz I have here uses a 100MHz bus and a 4.5:1 multiplier (which alternately might have been marked 9:2) to obtain the 450MHz CPU speed. A 700MHz CPU on a 100MHz bus would require a 7:1. If it really does have a 133MHz bus, it might be set to something like 5.2:1. In any case, your troubles are likely either bad memory or a too-hot CPU, the second of which might be something as simple as dust or a bad fan bearing. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:01:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ECC16A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednaught.net) Received: from exedra.zednaught.net (cpc2-cbly3-0-0-cust101.glfd.cable.ntl.com [86.13.152.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C590413C43E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednaught.net) Received: by delphi.zednaught.net (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 53372B863; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:28:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:28:24 +0100 From: Kelvin Woods To: Richard Lynch Message-ID: <20070613212824.GA1221@zednaught.net> References: <34588.216.230.84.67.1181749866.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34588.216.230.84.67.1181749866.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: periodic.conf quieter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:01:10 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:51:06AM -0500, Richard Lynch wrote: > Thanks to the fine folks here, I've gotten periodic.conf to only > output messages I need to know, *except* for this one: > > Security check: > (output mailed separately) > > I've looked through /et/defaults/periodic.conf, Google a fair amount, > and am still coming up empty with a setting to suppress that one... > > I'm probably just being stupid (again) but what am I missing? > > -- > Some people have a "gift" link here. > Know what I want? > I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. > http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch > Yeah, I get a buck. So? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You could always re-direct the output to a file... daily_status_security_output="/var/log/security.log" -- Kelvin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:32:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEB716A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5433613C45A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 18018 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 22:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.201?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@67.111.218.237 with plain) by smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 22:32:47 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: U5VosxsVM1njcv2M9Z49yCH5X9_W8Bb2FvbTCI1aDhwBRuwYt.xEaWErt0m4qWdOV3oytRFtsA-- Message-ID: <4670708A.5030805@george.lbl.gov> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:32:42 -0700 From: Jin Guojun User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: zh, zh-CN, en To: John Baldwin References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <200706121527.04274.jhb@freebsd.org> <466F4642.8070001@george.lbl.gov> <200706131001.25840.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200706131001.25840.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:32:48 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 12 June 2007 09:20:02 pm Jin Guojun wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 08:53:18 pm Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because anything equal to or below 1G options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size related. Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, following line causes the problem: options MAXDSIZ="(2097152U*1024)" Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen for some program? This is setting aside 2GB for malloc which leaves only 1GB for all of mmap and stack. You probably don't have enough address space to map your binary. This does not quite explain the problem. First of all, the MAXDSIZ is the maximum size for users to set their own datas ize limit by 'limit' utility. If user do not set a high limit for datasize, it should not be a pro blem. UTSL. By default proc0 gets a hard limit (lim_max vs lim_cur) of MAXDSIZ, and the max limit is what the ELF image activator in the kernel uses when figuring out where to mmap the runtime linker: /* * We load the dynamic linker where a userland call * to mmap(0, ...) would put it. The rationale behind this * calculation is that it leaves room for the heap to grow to * its maximum allowed size. */ addr = round_page((vm_offset_t)imgp->proc->p_vmspace->vm_daddr + lim_max(imgp->proc, RLIMIT_DATA)); The second aspect also counters this assumption, for machines that have less t han or equal to 1 GB memory, and setting the MAXDISZ = the maximum memory size will not cause such problem. For example, if the physical memory size is 512 MB, and setting MAXDSIZ=(512*1 024*1024) will not cause this problem. Or if the physical memory is 1GB, setting MAXDSIZ =(1024*1024*1024) will not cause the problem either. Umm, the amount of physical memory has no bearing on how the virtual address space for userland is laid out. Do you know what virtual memory is and how it works? Your first e-mail seems to contradict this paragraph as in your first e-mail you noted that the physical memory doesn't matter, the solution was to not raise MAXDSIZ higher than 1GB and that is consistent with running out of virtual address space due to MAXDSIZ reserving too much address space for malloc(). No quite clear on this. Does this mean that the MAXDSIZ cannot exceeed 1GB regardless how many physical memory (say 16 GB) is installed? Then, this is definitiely a software bug. Then, somewhere the following checking is needed: #if (MAXDSIZ > 1024 * 1024 * 1024) #undef MAXDSIZ #define MAXDSIZ (1024 * 1024 * 1024) #endif From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:58:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE4116A41F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xinopher@web.de) Received: from service01.clicktivities.net (service01.clicktivities.net [213.61.250.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184B313C469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xinopher@web.de) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (ns01.clicktivities.net [213.61.250.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by service01.clicktivities.net (8.12.11/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5DMXUFd089865; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:33:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from xinopher@web.de) Message-ID: <467070B9.6050600@web.de> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:33:29 +0200 From: Andreas Kuehl User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63-service02.2003.12.19 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-service02.2003.12.19 (2004-01-11) on service01.clicktivities.net Subject: fsck of large volume with small memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:58:22 -0000 Hi all Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a machine that has not that much memory, in this case only 1.5 GB. The fsck gives me a friendly # fsck /dev/da1 ** /dev/da1 ** Last Mounted on /fileserver ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 4290901164 bytes for inoinfo and quits. While the volume was not that full, fsck had no problems. Any hint to tune sysctl.conf or loader.conf or the kernel or anything else to give fsck the needed memory? I'm not yet at the point to mount readonly, scrap everything from the disk and repartition the volume to smaller pieces. Regards Andreas Kuehl --- Still owning my first cdrom containing 1.1.5 -------------schnipp------------- # swapinfo Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity /dev/da0s1b 1048576 0 1048576 0% /dev/da0s2b 1048576 0 1048576 0% /dev/da0s3b 1048576 0 1048576 0% /dev/da0s3d 1048576 0 1048576 0% /dev/da0s3f 1048576 0 1048576 0% Total 5242880 0 5242880 0% # uname -a FreeBSD friend.local 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Jun 12 23:13:07 CEST 2007 akuehl@friend.local:/build/obj/build/src/sys/SERVER i386 System is rebuild with freshly cvsuped /usr/src Kernel is GENERIC with added options SMP and removed unused controllers. # dmesg | less Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Jun 12 23:13:07 CEST 2007 akuehl@friend.local:/build/obj/build/src/sys/SERVER ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x400 Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1610547200 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1568907264 (1496 MB) (...) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 12 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 1248592MB (2557116416 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 159173C) (...) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:35:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E11416A46C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ossama2m@yahoo.com) Received: from web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.85.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6230E13C457 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ossama2m@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 94084 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2007 22:08:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=S9PFzsxeffbpNoLRDnx1FSA9uFcSywuOryJi6DbL3bGkU3dQABZ17XAimPwb9VJsyulttlUSiJ3nyj1x1Dng74DOWNPsoZj1yUXxG2JpZ/jx+hedsmLtMMmOs5Zgt+EeP27Iao6uf4cmTaW9E5Sv4K2w85vaUTUILBubznrJyDI=; X-YMail-OSG: hH7xbLcVM1lf9w51W_rj64TeG9fZ26rL6q8_tFP22j4rqLLYtTPvofTilzwDgtrihVzf2hTBLX5Wfiq.ynb2TobxKg_X8ZeU8sWRK9xrlrr.pGmsoXPfNClzdouJxQ-- Received: from [62.139.83.165] by web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:08:37 PDT Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:08:37 -0700 (PDT) From: ossama abdel-haleem To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <580199.92674.qm@web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:08:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Muti Gateways X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:35:17 -0000 Dear Sir, we going to design new concept in my company which built on the redundant solutions for this we've two WAN connections from two different providers so the question here is : How can I configure My FreeBSD server to accept and play with two different Routers (FreeBSD Server ->Router1 = 172.16.1.254 & Router2 = 172.16.1.74 ) every Branch Has a router which call the main routers in the HQ (BSD Server) . when I assigned the default single Gateway on the NIC the half of the branches connected so the second part doesn't connect. we tried to put another gateway IP address but the server hangs (delaying) what is the problem? what is the optimum solution ? and How by steps please. Thanks --------------------------------- Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:21:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EE216A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC5113C45D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8368C5160; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id E2C4929C002; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-9d81dbb000000a23-c3-46707bef956e Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id CB7AE30400B; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <580199.92674.qm@web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <580199.92674.qm@web37009.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <36AF432D-C0A8-4AB0-85C5-E1DC13CD7CF4@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:21:19 -0700 To: ossama abdel-haleem X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Muti Gateways X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:21:20 -0000 On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:08 PM, ossama abdel-haleem wrote: > we going to design new concept in my company which built on the > redundant solutions for this we've two WAN connections from two > different providers so the question here is : > How can I configure My FreeBSD server to accept and play with two > different Routers (FreeBSD Server ->Router1 = 172.16.1.254 & > Router2 = 172.16.1.74 ) You need to provide more information about your networking, such as whether you have an ASN and a routable address block, or whether your IPs are being delegated to you from your ISP(s). If so, then you ought to look into BGP/EGP. Otherwise, you might find something like carp(4) useful. However, FreeBSD does not support multiple default gateways-- the standard routing table is designed to give one and only one answer, based on the destination IP, for where packets should go. If you need more complicated routing, you can use something like the openbgpd port, aka http://www.openbgp.org/.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:32:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A0D16A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45E7213C45B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 18786 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 23:29:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 23:29:09 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DNWmGf024512 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5DNWmX4024511 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:48 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: mplayer and xmms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:32:50 -0000 I'm just generally curious about why XMMS is a dependency for MPlayer in FreeBSD. I accidentally uninstalled MPlayer by uninstalling XMMS, and am right now in the middle of reinstalling it from ports -- and it occurs to me that, as far as I'm aware, MPlayer doesn't in and of itself actually need XMMS. Have things changed since the last time I ran a box with MPlayer but no XMMS? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Leon Festinger: "A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts and figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:38:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738CB16A468 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp2.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0AB13C448 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l5DNceox028435; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:38:40 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:38:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <467070B9.6050600@web.de> In-Reply-To: <467070B9.6050600@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706140138.39853.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Andreas Kuehl Subject: Re: fsck of large volume with small memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:38:46 -0000 On Thursday 14 June 2007, Andreas Kuehl wrote: > Hi all > > Is there any possibillity to fsck a 1.2 TB 40% filled volume with a > machine that has not that much memory, in this case only 1.5 GB. > > The fsck gives me a friendly > > # fsck /dev/da1 > ** /dev/da1 > ** Last Mounted on /fileserver > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > fsck_ufs: cannot alloc 4290901164 bytes for inoinfo > > and quits. > > While the volume was not that full, fsck had no problems. > > Any hint to tune sysctl.conf or loader.conf or the kernel or anything > else to give fsck the needed memory? > > I'm not yet at the point to mount readonly, scrap everything from the > disk and repartition the volume to smaller pieces. > > Regards > Andreas Kuehl You seem to be running 32bit FreeBSD which has a limit of 4GB memory per process. fsck_ufs is obviously trying to allocate more (4.2GB) than your system would ever be able to provide, so it fails. The only solution in your case would be to put the disk (array) in a 64bit system, and running fsck from there. FYI, normally one can increase the memory available to processes with the kern.maxdsiz kenv variable, settable in loader.conf. On 32bit FreeBSD it is limited to 4G max, but on 64bit FreeBSD it is virtually unlimited. For example, I have here an AMD64 machine with 1GB memory, but it has a limit of 33GB per process. You can see what the current limit is by running 'limits' and looking at 'datasize'. HTH, Pieter de Goeje > > --- > Still owning my first cdrom containing 1.1.5 > > -------------schnipp------------- > # swapinfo > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/da0s1b 1048576 0 1048576 0% > /dev/da0s2b 1048576 0 1048576 0% > /dev/da0s3b 1048576 0 1048576 0% > /dev/da0s3d 1048576 0 1048576 0% > /dev/da0s3f 1048576 0 1048576 0% > Total 5242880 0 5242880 0% > > # uname -a > FreeBSD friend.local 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Jun > 12 23:13:07 CEST 2007 > akuehl@friend.local:/build/obj/build/src/sys/SERVER i386 > > System is rebuild with freshly cvsuped /usr/src > Kernel is GENERIC with added > options SMP > and removed unused controllers. > > > # dmesg | less > Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Jun 12 23:13:07 CEST 2007 > akuehl@friend.local:/build/obj/build/src/sys/SERVER > ACPI APIC Table: > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 > Features=0xbfebfbffA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFL USH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x400 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > real memory = 1610547200 (1535 MB) > avail memory = 1568907264 (1496 MB) > (...) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 12 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-4 device > da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da1: 1248592MB (2557116416 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 159173C) > (...) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:42:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2816A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB3713C43E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9995191A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:42:16 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070614004216.54c1a1be@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> References: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mplayer and xmms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:42:20 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:48 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > I'm just generally curious about why XMMS is a dependency for MPlayer > in FreeBSD. I accidentally uninstalled MPlayer by uninstalling XMMS, > and am right now in the middle of reinstalling it from ports -- and > it occurs to me that, as far as I'm aware, MPlayer doesn't in and of > itself actually need XMMS. Have things changed since the last time I > ran a box with MPlayer but no XMMS? > I doesn't depend on XMMS by default. You must have checked the XMMS plugin support option in the MPlayer port options menu. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:45:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AD216A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-4.eunet.yu (smtpclu-4.eunet.yu [194.247.192.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482E213C465 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:45:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-225-43.eunet.yu [213.198.225.43]) by smtpclu-4.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DNjQUW030233; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:45:27 +0200 Message-Id: <200706132345.l5DNjQUW030233@smtpclu-4.eunet.yu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:45:37 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> References: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_20,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -0.7 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: mplayer and xmms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:45:36 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:48 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote: > I'm just generally curious about why XMMS is a dependency for MPlayer > in FreeBSD. I accidentally uninstalled MPlayer by uninstalling XMMS, > and am right now in the middle of reinstalling it from ports -- and > it occurs to me that, as far as I'm aware, MPlayer doesn't in and of > itself actually need XMMS. Have things changed since the last time I > ran a box with MPlayer but no XMMS? Hello Chad, That dependency is optional in mplayer: .if defined(WITH_XMMS) CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D --enable-xmms LIB_DEPENDS+=3D xmms.4:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/xmms .else CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D --disable-xmms .endif It should be sufficient to turn off "Enable XMMS plugin support" with 'make config'. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:49:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7E116A400 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1834C13C465 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal (svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal [10.0.0.3]) by bcmelmx.bytecraft.au.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5DNn66w007798; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:49:06 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au) Received: from svmailmel.bytecraft.internal (Not Verified[10.0.0.24]) by svmarshal2.bytecraft.internal with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 4, 441) id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:49:06 +1000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:49:05 +1000 Message-ID: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F137B391@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: open source X11 capture/playback tool thread-index: Acetu/ADjiStE4xnTVaaAqabwHb70QAWURLg From: "Murray Taylor" To: "Matthias Apitz" , "Reid Linnemann" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: open source X11 capture/playback tool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:49:20 -0000 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Matthias Apitz > Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2007 11:07 PM > To: Reid Linnemann > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: open source X11 capture/playback tool >=20 > El d=EDa Wednesday, June 13, 2007 a las 08:00:39AM -0500, Reid=20 > Linnemann escribi=F3: >=20 > > Written by Matthias Apitz on 06/13/07 05:52>> > > >Hello, > > > > > >Is there some Open Source X11 capture/playback tool for testing > > >X11 applications by collecting the XEvents in a file, changing them > > >and re-playing the XEvents? Thx in advance > > > > > > matthias > >=20 > > A quick look at the ports tree reveals this candidate: > >=20 > > Port: xnee-2.05 > > Path: /usr/ports/x11/xnee > > Info: X events recorder and player > >=20 >=20 > I've looked around before posting, even with >=20 > # make search name=3D.... >=20 > maybe I'm to stupid :-( >=20 > Thx for the hint >=20 > matthias try make search key=3D.... next time its a wider search, not just a name search and make search key=3D... | grep Port trims the output down to the port names. =20 --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material.=20 E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:53:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC13016A469 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDC813C455 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:53:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so672284pyi for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B4UeaW1T5IVjP+VLoAgJrSlydZ6l1aXJoRTDoWo6KIWpSBk4blQMxo+PiamOcIsugsgCMpJQi0KDPn/q5LQnuHwmXKZ+GhKot3V8yINeSoWjkej1yXymOcfKfAJ1fanLTglhPeSjFPUDtH/KG2ur39Jakr3kJn7d2G/RBStqfz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CkUOQxBsJMRnQto96XyZ31qrHITnZgR3bKAv7BTdCW0F8H6kFovJ2SDeXx1NgcF3lO2Ay1QuwLJkpidINDRzU3dSxHJYePj01ZOf4LlviI42mdqEQoCJT0SJvLDj8NouqKuf952SzUWSt3Cq/4fAYCkUVKTVBCgqGHF6kT2h9Xo= Received: by 10.35.57.2 with SMTP id j2mr2041589pyk.1181778836125; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706131653s5c68c723sa52e7921ff2288e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:53:56 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706120902k2c10be37q8656814f9fcfc649@mail.gmail.com> <20070612161414.GA68472@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706120925g2816f84elfbd14cb5e278358b@mail.gmail.com> <20070612203425.GA74894@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <340a29540706121628u1fdc583el7ecdb3596f7d48e4@mail.gmail.com> <340a29540706130625l4fefdac5ke1d88783e459ab92@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:53:57 -0000 On 6/13/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > The CPU on basically every x86 machine after the original > pentium runs faster than the bus (or memory) speed. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Side_Bus > > The board will probably have jumpers (though sometimes > boards this old will have bios options) to select Front Side > Bus speed (typically 33, 50, 60, 66, 75, 100, 120, and 133MHz > on a machine of this age) and a second set of jumpers to > select the CPU multiplier. > An old K6-III 450MHz I have here uses a 100MHz bus and > a 4.5:1 multiplier (which alternately might have been marked > 9:2) to obtain the 450MHz CPU speed. A 700MHz CPU on > a 100MHz bus would require a 7:1. If it really does have a > 133MHz bus, it might be set to something like 5.2:1. > > In any case, your troubles are likely either bad memory or > a too-hot CPU, the second of which might be something > as simple as dust or a bad fan bearing. > > -- > -- > My suspicion is also for the memory. Due to some laziness on my part, I'm going to just swap out the PC 133 stuff with the PC 100 stuff that I have to see if that fixes it. This PC 100 stuff used to run a Fedora, and later, an OpenBSD system. On both I performed builds of various software. So, I'm going to give it a try. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 00:04:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31E916A46B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D166F13C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 98698 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 00:00:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 00:00:57 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5E04b1i024655 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:04:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5E04a3H024654 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:04:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:04:36 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070614000436.GA24635@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070613233248.GB24459@demeter.hydra> <200706132345.l5DNjQUW030233@smtpclu-4.eunet.yu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706132345.l5DNjQUW030233@smtpclu-4.eunet.yu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: mplayer and xmms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:04:39 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:45:37AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:48 -0600 > Chad Perrin wrote: > > > I'm just generally curious about why XMMS is a dependency for MPlayer > > in FreeBSD. I accidentally uninstalled MPlayer by uninstalling XMMS, > > and am right now in the middle of reinstalling it from ports -- and > > it occurs to me that, as far as I'm aware, MPlayer doesn't in and of > > itself actually need XMMS. Have things changed since the last time I > > ran a box with MPlayer but no XMMS? > > Hello Chad, > > That dependency is optional in mplayer: > > .if defined(WITH_XMMS) > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-xmms > LIB_DEPENDS+= xmms.4:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/xmms > .else > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-xmms > .endif > > It should be sufficient to turn off "Enable XMMS plugin support" with > 'make config'. Thanks much. I forgot all about having done that back when I first installed MPlayer. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Leon Festinger: "A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts and figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 00:33:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3068516A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3013C45A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so686123pyi for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=k46lGt7WEE22a9yQuOY9g0lIwRwTpTXbXeGDP6ZV7FiudBdqrzVK89VsHnwpxGiJRQ/ladgc0QHPUP0toTb0boFhBJKBm90jt6jwc5Gsanow+KdsmCPxi9uDsuN06nnwmdrlCR4aBoKJOUwa6xxYyFPCC+S+2iKaFJvZgwW5fxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IU6nYXzeIUMCSuJ1Brm0knxYjk+XY4odhGHmGpWy3fOu/Xq9HnejbA8/5ppdmfGNtfxTWB8cJ9Tipd8f0kDPhN6qLrHdCLg5e4+bKM+8mV9IBWVR7xuuwe87t1RTE3zb1a7IsWKUG8zIfxlZxo6CjVp9hvqEJmwv0tKNWY1iVIU= Received: by 10.35.97.17 with SMTP id z17mr2085461pyl.1181781196098; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706131733p19304e5fp6502f0146a449da1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:33:16 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:33:17 -0000 Hi, I was just wondering, a while ago I remember seeing a port for the nvidia driver. I was just wondering, does this work on amd64? Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 00:43:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD91B16A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E9313C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526615193B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:42:59 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070614014259.098f1053@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706131733p19304e5fp6502f0146a449da1@mail.gmail.com> References: <340a29540706131733p19304e5fp6502f0146a449da1@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:43:02 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:33:16 -0600 "Andrew Falanga" wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering, a while ago I remember seeing a port for the > nvidia driver. I was just wondering, does this work on amd64? No. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 00:47:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D064716A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B081613C455 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn01.u.washington.edu (hymn01.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.55]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5E0lIxF016674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:47:18 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn01.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5E0lIfo001605 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:47:18 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn01.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:47:18 PDT Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070614014259.098f1053@gumby.homeunix.com.> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.13.173141 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:47:18 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, RW wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:33:16 -0600 > "Andrew Falanga" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was just wondering, a while ago I remember seeing a port for the >> nvidia driver. I was just wondering, does this work on amd64? > > No. Just to quell any further discussion on this, there's a thread that's on current@, and it has the wiki page and other relevant resources as to why FreeBSD isn't currently up on nVidia's compatible list for amd64. Only i386 works currently. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 01:04:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D15C16A46E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4123113C45B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 83433 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 01:04:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=qoqs0g4r7P2vsJrFOXyNCDeijj+U54zFV0qCGLrwKPQ7vhQmdCwv3aZtxJXs2BwrDzsgznkeIEuD5HEEa3MoCwHxMcpNuEboG7DaR0ZTJoQ6GtHJqXYfGziP1RII11RzHN09FnWMzEmsXHeCMo3u2G7WimXM6TxJTQregqYcvRs= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp102.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 01:04:08 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 49szQ80VM1mihm92flsEm2kiNCQi0R6gEgbSYNiMA8OTOdnqL6ptQXDHWr3qK0ycFqFXNoVyo7u5h5IKLtpIqx6Y5CqHHybtnwrilIhHOYuZ7m7VSQg- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <11b881facfc3ab3a0469409f7750f229@prodigy.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: jekillen Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:06:25 -0700 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:04:09 -0000 Hello; I have not understood what the request for "-" "-" meant. Thank you, this as shed a lot of light on it. I have seen that fairly frequently in my Apache logs. But on one of my machines that serves as secondary name server I also had Apache running to serve a place holder site. It was attacked but voluminous request for that, so much so that it was causing Apache to kill processes for lack of memory. The machine does not have a lot of RAM at its disposal, so it was not too surprising. I do not run Apache on this machine, now, because of that. I would like to know how do you disallow 'no referrer' and 'no browser'? Is this a server configuration issue? I have not seen mention of this in texts on Apache, nor the manual. And queries of the Apache mailing list yielded indistinct results. I am not running a proxy on the public server. I have shell and ftp access blocked from out side. I am using php as application server. I am running several machines with FreeBSD 6.0 and 6.2 as web servers. Only one serves my public addresses. I am using Apache 1.3.x. Thanks in advance for guidance. Jeff K > 220.137.74.222 - - [12/Jun/2007:02:07:08 +1000] "CONNECT > msa-mx10.hinet.net:25 HTTP/1.0" 403 272 "-" "-" > > 403 = Permission denied. In this case, because > I disallow 'no referrer' plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from > non-local addresses > blocking > heaps of rogue robots, but CONNECT requests don't work anyway in apache > 1.3 in default configuration .. older logs show 405 responses to these. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 01:35:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E480D16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: from smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4288313C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: (qmail 9593 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 01:09:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=VT3PzzRw5r+yj7RLJjBwsw6enBiFADQ+scLF1n59nMANvf7k1859WMTPR326CIQWmqkgSaimJ8U62Zffv2clWlBRKYRSeUk6kUCjpG4/HQSdnTeRMIVaMT19AyfPQUO2m/1jUcmc2JE+Bf8xkHuXHQdSZGV05iWITW1bZSrhHWc= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.22?) (thomas.sparrevohn@btinternet.com@81.159.89.57 with login) by smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 01:09:12 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: UA0FpfsVM1l9crOUr9m7F7uGULK8U8544.UyCjUN8j_P4ecJwJDcpyhZlggewpNU_gSLT5j8fQ-- From: Thomas Sparrevohn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:09:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:35:54 -0000 On Thursday 14 June 2007 01:47:18 youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, RW wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:33:16 -0600 > > "Andrew Falanga" wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was just wondering, a while ago I remember seeing a port for the > >> nvidia driver. I was just wondering, does this work on amd64? > > > > No. > > I found that the "vesa" driver works ok with a GTX 8800 - not fast - but works From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 02:56:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A9716A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F48213C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so422710mue for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:56:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ccAZwuEJKKfzbsdbLzaWR6thugoTz/cxwmCV1w+wmEG+pUsTFwXOjcxBtMvKmvJ3aMkz4AqYq277WIM7KT3kpfwFRPDD7egOqXn+zjrbCgOJosW+fJpi3Chpm0+9fm+h+/dN6wX2FJgsVL0xBao/Cgfx8SOPan7P+w1QI1IMZBQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mqcx9U/Ay466k11FWcfeCvQB20Jn5zDPM7f6aohRIx3XdgW2Qq9vLRlR6Fvnq/ZrUA9jyisNUOTXYU3E26hzf1zBOV3NHOk/CKHzVpfT77HKXKMSbSTNBYSMpddcXHLAsdZPw+ANdeAcu93zCky9iYZaQXUuA4evGlKHh/n3+gU= Received: by 10.82.175.17 with SMTP id x17mr2476219bue.1181789790873; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:56:30 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "FreeBSD Questions" In-Reply-To: <20070613080246.GA20321@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> <20070613080246.GA20321@demeter.hydra> Subject: Re: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 02:56:33 -0000 On 13/06/07, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:06:08AM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > On 13/06/07, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > >On 12/06/07, Chad Perrin wrote: > > >> No matter what I try to look up with ri (the Ruby information utility > > >> that is used to look up stuff about classes, methods, et cetera, from the > > >> command line), it returns the same result: > > >> > > >> > ri Time.strftime > > >> Nothing known about Time.strftime > > >> > > >> I don't see anything in /usr/ports/lang that seems to relate to the > > >> matter of ensuring ri has a database of information to share. What am I > > >> missing? How can I get ri working properly on FreeBSD? > > > > > >On a hunch I typed "ri -h" . . . > > >and another hunch made me type "ri -c" . . . > > > > > >. . . > > >Well, crap. rdoc wants something I can't think > > >to give it. > > >Hopefully this will start making sense. > > > > > > > Hello, self. Also, hello, Chad! > > > > % tar jxvf /ports/distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.bz2 > > % sudo rdoc --ri -R -U ruby-1.8.6/ > > > > seems to be producing output. > > Interesting. Any idea why this isn't more obvious? > > I guess my mistake was in not trying "ri -c". I'm also not terribly > clear on how I'd have guessed at: > /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.bz2 > > . . . without any easily discoverable guidance. Something on the ruby site hinted at the rdoc parser needing the source files, though I suppose that hardly qualifies as "Easily discoverable guidance". > > Thanks much! It's working now. No, thank _you_. I had given up on making ri work myself. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 03:15:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754C516A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2DD13C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB808452FE for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:07:21 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at esfm.ipn.mx Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5NGK2eRMQJsh for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 455E8452FC; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F29452E1 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:15:16 -0000 Hello Guys, I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, built-in in my computer's motherboard. My motherboard is D945NT. I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. The problem seems to be that X is trying to find /dev/agpgart, according to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family Graphics Controller (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was already clear (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is available for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, and it seems to me that it is not a problem of memory allocation. so... What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? My kernel has device agp present. Thank you in advance. Eduardo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 03:18:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D6C16A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD2713C43E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 17069 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 13:18:14 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 13:18:13 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:18:09 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Nikola Lecic Message-ID: <20070614131809.5cf45544@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200706131805.l5DI59LG026502@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> References: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> <200706131805.l5DI59LG026502@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions ML Subject: Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:18:14 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200 Nikola Lecic wrote: > I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_ > experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1). > Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try. > I attached my pkg_info, please take a look. Hi Nikola, thanks for the info. I agree, I have been using -STABLE since the 6.0 release days with OO and XFCE with no problems at all, it just started yesterday. I thought that it could be related to having 2 java VMs installed (linux-blackdown-1.4, which I use as plugin for linux-firefox, and diablo-jdk-1.5 for everything else) - that's the setup in my laptop. But my other PC has only diablo-jdk and has the same problem. I dont have any related libmap.conf configurations that may/should affect this. [LoN]Kamikaze's reply solved the problem - see my next post :) thx! _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 03:25:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AC316A46B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B2113C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 17694 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 13:25:36 +1000 Received: from 203-217-66-106.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.66.106) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 13:25:36 +1000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:25:32 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" Message-ID: <20070614132532.66631a49@localhost> In-Reply-To: <467041F0.4040301@gmx.de> References: <20070614031603.18fd00a2@localhost> <467041F0.4040301@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions ML Subject: Re: OpenOffice 2.2 dies under XFCE 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:36 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200 "[LoN]Kamikaze" wrote: > Norberto Meijome wrote: > > Hi all, > > all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The "time to crash" crash changes depending on what is done: > > > > - Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds) > > - Calc dies right away > > - the common interface stays on until I open a menu (or close it, if opening didnt crash)... v strange. > > > > What may be : > > Interestingly enough, if I run an XNest session from within my XFCE and log in as another user, also under xfce 4.4, it has no problems at all. > > Same user, xfce4.4, default X server, OO dies. > > My account using twm, works fine. (twm under xnest works fine too). > > I haven't got another gnome-based WM at hand to test with. [...] > > So I guess I'm onto something...i just don't know what yet :-D > > > > I've done a full > > ktrace -i openoffice.org-2.2.0 > > and dumped the text version of it at > > > > http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/oo_20070614 > > > > (2 MB compressed, 8 MB uncompressed). OO is exiting with 0x4E , but i cant figure out what it means or what's causing it. > > > > Any clues, anyone? :) > > thanks!! > > Try setting OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP to kde or none. This seems to be a GTK related issue. Mate, thanks ! this solved the problem - the UI elements in OO have now lost their distinctive gtk theme look, but that's fine with me . I just wonder what has changed over the last few days in my machines to have this problem,after all this time with no issues at all. thanks again :) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "We must openly accept all ideologies and systems as means of solving humanity's problems. One country, one nation, one ideology, one system is not sufficient." Dalai Lama. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 03:26:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FBB16A476 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from smtp101.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF93C13C4B7 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 22060 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2007 21:20:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gy2/f0VTPPGw8/qiVhngRHuDQRgFEjR9nfpX1qonkJaVC3mQjnA3KLCdKa8Wc5Hy9tdsx8Gbii4+wTnG2LCScKWJgF0ZUeOjCNzKcjbh95lhGu7iwyBc0aoblt7KmtsFx65RPozuLM4WFV8AwDV5NYFrrwNnQPGUD5+kG0f/+aM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (stevan_tiefert@84.165.80.169 with plain) by smtp101.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2007 21:20:09 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: p1BVKNQVM1n.PYqlguXX5k0n9DVvh_8m9wiVJKTuSvNDdNSr From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:19:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1181769588.38379.4.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: can not add a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:26:49 -0000 Hello list, I left a little bit space left in my slice during the installation. Now I wanted to use this left space to create a gbde-partition. When I use sysinstall and create in menu "Label" a new partition and I hit "W" to write my changes to disk an error appears, that label didn't created the partition I wanted. My question is why can I not add a partition in my existing slice? On what should I take care maybe? ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 03:53:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7AE16A46D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3121C13C46E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so610215uge for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:53:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RU8F7fTAhIEKxkV+I309ysAgthlnSb9Sbk4xufzRoJwxdbUjIZVsxOBQmBQ6YYxjhbGXmTaamknI0bSIIEXpqrs4xRKbJNTjKSgq3VCspPiRO+FugIY3y0U2VH0YdWNtwhVgaLZ4AZG9RMNiISBdw9PAo+JSCF3py45ehbflEic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SlWlpWCB/iA0w/utJR0PNeTpmqQNJLCLbb5L/XrpZc0oEoht+baeTgK0JmKDDoNpYRcAroReZk9GZ9kyfqQjPDJa9oPhjPOxyTPRX1Mo1W1TtVEAkFoyu73rX+/Pcuz3LCCSjwpgvhtfutXdP43jAN2rcdWJ1f7HOFz7tBNwXR0= Received: by 10.82.146.14 with SMTP id t14mr2537259bud.1181793231703; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:53:51 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Stevan Tiefert" In-Reply-To: <1181769588.38379.4.camel@vagabund.w33> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1181769588.38379.4.camel@vagabund.w33> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not add a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:53:53 -0000 On 13/06/07, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello list, > > I left a little bit space left in my slice during the installation. Now > I wanted to use this left space to create a gbde-partition. > > When I use sysinstall and create in menu "Label" a new partition and I > hit "W" to write my changes to disk an error appears, that label didn't > created the partition I wanted. > > My question is why can I not add a partition in my existing slice? On > what should I take care maybe? > sysinstall, while functional, is quite slow and clumsy. Assuming your disk is /dev/ad0, try: % bsdlabel ad0s1 (this won't modify anything) The out put should resemble: # /dev/ad0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2097152 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 b: 995328 2097152 swap c: 20044080 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 2594816 3092480 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 2097152 5687296 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 12259632 7784448 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 If I had any room left here (I don't) I could # bsdlabel -e ad0s1 and add the line: g: * * unused 0 0 at the bottom, which would cause bsdlabel to dedicate any remaining space to partition "g" and do all the offset calculations for me. (If you are unfamiliar with vi, you can type setenv EDITOR ee (or export EDITOR=ee if you use bash (ksh should take bash syntax, I think. You're on your own with zsh)) first.) And then # newfs -U ad0s1g Note well that you can only have a-h, as I believe the eight partition limit still holds under bsdlabel. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 04:27:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81E216A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from serv24.hostings.pl (serv24.hostings.pl [195.117.130.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7493713C480 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from apache by serv24.hostings.pl with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hydrs-0001Oa-JQ for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:11:20 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Marvelous Artwork MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:11:20 +0200 Cc: Subject: Online Part-Time Worker Needed Seat at Home X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:27:23 -0000 Marvelous Artwork & CO are in need of part time workers that will make cool cash $1,500 working from home for online representating Marvelous Artwork & CO to recieve Certified and verified payments ,no qualifications needed,just good english communication,internet network,if interested contact us for more informations kooldealone@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 04:40:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088AA16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from serv24.hostings.pl (serv24.hostings.pl [195.117.130.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA3013C465 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from apache by serv24.hostings.pl with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hydmc-00066w-Sa for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:05:54 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Marvelous Artwork MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:05:54 +0200 Cc: Subject: Online Part-Time Worker Needed Seat at Home X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:40:19 -0000 Marvelous Artwork & CO are in need of part time workers that will make cool cash $1,500 working from home for online representating Marvelous Artwork & CO to recieve Certified and verified payments ,no qualifications needed,just good english communication,internet network,if interested contact us for more informations kooldealone@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 04:41:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DF516A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EF4C13C44C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 11631 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 04:37:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 04:37:53 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5E4fXpe025585 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:41:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5E4fWIY025584 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:41:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:41:32 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20070614044132.GA25556@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20070612231052.GB18576@demeter.hydra> <20070613080246.GA20321@demeter.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: ri doesn't seem to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:41:35 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:56:30PM -0400, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >Thanks much! It's working now. > > No, thank _you_. I had given up on making > ri work myself. I'm glad it worked out for both of us, then. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] awj @reddit: "The terms never and always are never always true." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 05:20:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337BD16A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C057913C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5E5MkJW013877; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5E5KbJ0000824; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:20:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: Thomas Sparrevohn References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:20:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> (Thomas Sparrevohn's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 02\:09\:12 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:20:46 -0000 Thomas Sparrevohn writes: > I found that the "vesa" driver works ok with a GTX 8800 - not fast - > but works People don't have a GTX8800 to have it just 'work' It needs to work fast! Personally I think it's very bad FreeBSD is not supported by nVidia, like f.i. solaris is. I don't want to write in favor of solaris, mind you, but it _is_ very nice to have Xorg-7.2 installed (both 32 and 64 bits) and a working 32 _and_ 64 bits native nVidia driver with it. I have used FreeBSD for years and still hate to see this lack of support by others :-( -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 06:11:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158D316A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E751513C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5E6BnUX016000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:11:50 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5E6BnDU009393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:11:49 -0700 Message-ID: <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:11:50 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.13.224933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:11:53 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Thomas Sparrevohn writes: > > >> I found that the "vesa" driver works ok with a GTX 8800 - not fast - >> but works >> > > People don't have a GTX8800 to have it just 'work' > It needs to work fast! > Personally I think it's very bad FreeBSD is not supported by nVidia, > like f.i. solaris is. > I don't want to write in favor of solaris, mind you, but it _is_ very > nice to have Xorg-7.2 installed (both 32 and 64 bits) and a working 32 > _and_ 64 bits native nVidia driver with it. > > I have used FreeBSD for years and still hate to see this lack of > support by others :-( > > Again, read my response and do some research before you blame nVidia. The nv driver works better than the vesa driver IMO -- it provides much better 2D support than the vesa driver. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 06:42:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232F316A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cadastrosonline@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com [66.196.100.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAEC613C48A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cadastrosonline@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 62764 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jun 2007 06:15:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=vHrYvVkS6Vqs1QHNaAQEB3z+5F6Gika6Yb2EkwDfqpBGkt4/oAXL+ahULQqTsQikb8JDN0+njoaSh9uZh9vaRgdV8xNacw/aF01xsj9Sz8HBsWzpFYOt6mdcND8uJGacjBvcuu2fsjXaRWZifvHXpPUFpxR7zjkGh4Qz0o1BVf4=; X-YMail-OSG: r74t6dIVM1nhW2qultk8.k_T64RXyrySMoOj6Kh0mcvUbuHg7I7ZF62bAhI.YrBe24f.w1BKEchIb2nv3kQ3pXiyBA-- Received: from [209.73.178.43] by web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:15:32 CDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.29 YahooMailWebService/0.7.41.16 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:15:32 -0500 (CDT) From: cadastrosonline cadastrosonline To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Memory mannagment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:42:13 -0000 First of all,=0A=0A=0A=0A"Each process has its own private address space. T= he address space is initially divided=0Ainto three logical segments: text,= =0Adata, and stack. "=0A=0A=0A=0ABut if the address is just something like = 343556 then how does it=0Areally work? The memory is divided into segments = is that what it means?=0A=0A=0A=0A"The data segment contains the initialize= d and uninitialized data portions of a program"=0A=0A=0A=0AIs it talking ab= out multithreading? I COULDNT FIND anything talking=0Aabout how freebsd dea= ls with multithreading, just found out it does it=0Aby man pthread.=0A=0A= =0A=0ATell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, do= es=0Ait use any algorithm to substitute a page when out of pages in memory?= =0Asuch as "second chance" "fifo" "lru" (last recently used) "nfu" (not=0Af= requently used) and so on? I am studying freebsd but sometimes I am=0Aout o= f ways to find out, yes I am reading the handbook about memory=0Amannagment= as you can see my quotes but sometimes I don't understand.=0A=0A=0A=0AThan= ks in advance.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A______________________________= ______________________________________________________=0ANovo Yahoo! Cad=EA= ? - Experimente uma nova busca.=0Ahttp://yahoo.com.br/oqueeuganhocomisso From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 07:55:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E509016A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47DE13C447 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5E7tEha000680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:55:14 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5E7tDa8023438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:55:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4670F462.8020002@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:55:14 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cadastrosonline cadastrosonline References: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.14.3351 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LEO_OBFU_SUBJ_RE 0.1, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory mannagment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:55:15 -0000 cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote: > First of all, > > > > "Each process has its own private address space. The address space is initially divided > into three logical segments: text, > data, and stack. " > > > > But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it > really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it means? > > > > "The data segment contains the initialized and uninitialized data portions of a program" > > > > Is it talking about multithreading? I COULDNT FIND anything talking > about how freebsd deals with multithreading, just found out it does it > by man pthread. > > > > Tell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, does > it use any algorithm to substitute a page when out of pages in memory? > such as "second chance" "fifo" "lru" (last recently used) "nfu" (not > frequently used) and so on? I am studying freebsd but sometimes I am > out of ways to find out, yes I am reading the handbook about memory > mannagment as you can see my quotes but sometimes I don't understand. > > > > Thanks in advance. > This question is better suited for the hackers@ list, and before doing that I suggest buying/checking out a copy of the book The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System. Many of your questions can be possibly answered better by taking a computer architecture and/or operating systems course, as many of the questions and ideas you have most likely apply to real-time operating systems, including Linux, OSX, Solaris and even (gasp) Windows, not just FreeBSD. Some of my 2 cents: Threading is known as LWP (Light-weight processes). Some differences are present, but the basic semantics of what one deems as non-threaded programs (processes), also applies to threads. Sharing, scheduling, and overall applied load are the overall big differences present in a threaded system, when compared to a procedural only system. Cheers and happy learning, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 08:16:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518CC16A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from serv24.hostings.pl (serv24.hostings.pl [195.117.130.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA0713C4B0 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piotr60@moje.pl) Received: from apache by serv24.hostings.pl with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hydpe-00007m-Uk for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:09:03 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Marvelous Artwork MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:09:02 +0200 Cc: Subject: Online Part-Time Worker Needed Seat at Home X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:16:47 -0000 Marvelous Artwork & CO are in need of part time workers that will make cool cash $1,500 working from home for online representating Marvelous Artwork & CO to recieve Certified and verified payments ,no qualifications needed,just good english communication,internet network,if interested contact us for more informations kooldealone@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 08:37:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AF716A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EFB13C45A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (vader.bytemobile.ondsl.gr [83.235.244.135]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l5E8auTS010560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:37:03 +0300 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5E8aatg003397; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:36:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5E8aapC003396; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:36:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:36:36 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: cadastrosonline@yahoo.com.br Message-ID: <20070614083635.GA3360@kobe.laptop> References: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.854, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.31, BAYES_20 -0.74) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory mannagment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:37:15 -0000 On 2007-06-14 01:15, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote: > First of all, > > "Each process has its own private address space. The address space is initially divided > into three logical segments: text, > data, and stack. " > > But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it > really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it > means? An answer to this is a very long introductory course in UNIX systems internals. In general, you can find a lot of detail about memory management and allocation in books like ``The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System''[1] or even the classic book of Abraham Silberschatz called ``Operating System Concepts''[2]. [1] http://www.amazon.com/Design-Implementation-FreeBSD-Operating-System/dp/0201702452 [2] http://www.amazon.com/Operating-System-Concepts-Abraham-Silberschatz/dp/0471694665 > "The data segment contains the initialized and uninitialized data portions of a program" > > Is it talking about multithreading? I COULDNT FIND anything talking > about how freebsd deals with multithreading, just found out it does it > by man pthread. No, it's not talking about multi-threading. Please see [1] above for concepts like `process' and `thread' in FreeBSD. > Tell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, does > it use any algorithm to substitute a page when out of pages in memory? This is also explained in [1] above :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 11:15:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023016A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3155D13C448 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so682929uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:15:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=TL1VQQ2j2f54uAflBaVEC4JDYUxbybqDRa7Qtwbzp80iQCmkJSMkLixR7qNFbZo909ea2Rq89KH+Y5wDqWGq4qwbaXplS29yNC7qLKEVQ4k9xQwfVDd52uA4fGny7fjPOED43v30tWBhsPpN+Pgei92fctpTdmfGhL2ALoJ/Njs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=JoQ1WF38yqveboyLfNe/3cwKy1r1PfduEptZRLFm3CSwRdUF5EYg5u5ess9+FeONaa80I+cVPu2WHclFGhOKaGQ3dAHN1iWVQdG1XgXVRpr55lBEPJL311DIakBA6GemJhK+Z2jnnLMJbDpAjvraikt+dfC41To/RVydoinQLs4= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr3152779buf.1181819731307; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1? ( [217.206.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7sm5076881nfh.2007.06.14.04.15.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:15:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Evans To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20070614083635.GA3360@kobe.laptop> References: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <20070614083635.GA3360@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-R+JSUcgdUh5bSY6olt+l" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:15:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1181819729.1212.21.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, cadastrosonline@yahoo.com.br Subject: Re: Memory mannagment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:15:33 -0000 --=-R+JSUcgdUh5bSY6olt+l Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:36 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-06-14 01:15, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote: > > First of all, > > > > "Each process has its own private address space. The address space is i= nitially divided > > into three logical segments: text, > > data, and stack. " > > > > But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it > > really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it > > means? >=20 > An answer to this is a very long introductory course in UNIX systems > internals. In general, you can find a lot of detail about memory > management and allocation in books like ``The Design and Implementation > of the FreeBSD Operating System''[1] or even the classic book of Abraham > Silberschatz called ``Operating System Concepts''[2]. >=20 > [1] http://www.amazon.com/Design-Implementation-FreeBSD-Operating-System/= dp/0201702452 > [2] http://www.amazon.com/Operating-System-Concepts-Abraham-Silberschatz/= dp/0471694665 >=20 > > "The data segment contains the initialized and uninitialized data porti= ons of a program" > > > > Is it talking about multithreading? I COULDNT FIND anything talking > > about how freebsd deals with multithreading, just found out it does it > > by man pthread. >=20 > No, it's not talking about multi-threading. Please see [1] above for > concepts like `process' and `thread' in FreeBSD. >=20 > > Tell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, does > > it use any algorithm to substitute a page when out of pages in memory? >=20 > This is also explained in [1] above :) I'd also suggest 'Operating Systems Design and Implementation' [1] by Andrew Tanenbaum (wrote MINIX, teaches OS design at a Dutch uni, lots and lots of OS research).=20 $108 seems a lot for a book tho (sure I didn't pay that much?!). [1] http://www.amazon.com/Operating-Systems-Implementation-Prentice-Software/dp= /0131429388 --=-R+JSUcgdUh5bSY6olt+l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGcSNRlcRvFfyds/cRAlXIAKCuVSDDR7Z7owNjIyMncXDMrVpLZACcCadk xoJ8segCTwu+MHGkSmHg9rs= =Ua3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-R+JSUcgdUh5bSY6olt+l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 11:31:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBFC16A473 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0CB13C4BF for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so686039uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:31:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=shXge7sZaZ3++jjb/rtksv1/dfCTBL4ZTR+FGCCF6XYHFDgBzScedFNsPuRD3Oq/NywpoZ76LaGuLS+W0ufPPNDVZNXvu+h7b7T9Py79NuK6c0Nt9lkBDVuRmvUtZKJVfZaRdaFJYdNY6GUi8zl6+Kkdz3LXNBBV8umrgYGogJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=iaLAWi5op63baG9c7Y5uZROQ5zhxnP6ia6beVDqAVdFQtFx072KwGHFI6DIwBpmU5K0ENMj5dyfe6kc/11YlQaObNzLq7H/1hVffGiC1NVuKcKtJtMevwgfr1ujymiz0AY/mnWbvovXEntsLbhz/7Tr+Fv7v59HuHLkgNKMGNvs= Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr3148505buf.1181819248993; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1? ( [217.206.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35sm3980358nfu.2007.06.14.04.07.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:07:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Evans To: Erik Norgaard In-Reply-To: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> References: <466DA9E0.8040207@locolomo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eY6AagojKPDFPpLFHwij" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:07:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1181819246.1212.15.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD box/ADSL link config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:31:45 -0000 --=-eY6AagojKPDFPpLFHwij Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:00 +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Hi: >=20 > I am a bit confused as to what exactly I am trying to do - or that is=20 > how the protocols layers and stuff. My current setup is like this: >=20 > 10.0.0/24 192.168.0/24 static IP > Wireless ))--- AP --- FreeBSD -------------- DSL ------------- Internet > many-1 1-1 > NAT NAT >=20 > I'd like to have the 192.168.0/24 disappear from the network topology,=20 > and have the routable static ip right on my FreeBSD box. The DSL box is=20 > configured with PPPoE: .. >=20 > The DSL router in question is a Thomson Speedtouch 546v6. >=20 > Any hints, howtos or other on how to do this? >=20 > Thanks, Erik >=20 My Thomson Speedtouch (716v5WL) allows it to be set up as an ethernet bridge, effectively turning into a fancy modem. Eg, my setup is like this: 172.30.0.0/16 Public IP Peer IP LAN switch/AP ----------- FreeBSD Router------- DSL ST -------- Peer =09 Effectively, the speedtouch just hands everything off to the bsd router, which in turn knows nothing about ADSL or PPP, and just uses the standard em(4) network driver. None of this stuff was configurable through the speedtouch's web interface, but is fairly straightforward once you read the 300 page manual, the 200 page CLI manual and dissect the configuration templates that tell the box how to operate.=20 --=-eY6AagojKPDFPpLFHwij Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGcSFolcRvFfyds/cRAnv7AKC3yczrSRg7bZw0Pnbr6A46dexx1wCdH+Zb 1+rijU1WqVyXkIkK+1jwDQ8= =HRn7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eY6AagojKPDFPpLFHwij-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 12:14:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0DD16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED9E13C46A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so694548uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:14:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h47pVpSH4mQXF6UDBZ2cwDUh/qBNWIk34ffs3sguvH4Ztg2SrAYGx+3ePTg3xV+8ae2luW8XB+erN7bHUULx9Neg9JMyhpXO47Pk070F6E7KFbKMacdDfoDxKsNhJ1nckC7V7HyZQMm7lSChpDMIFEssyFWnikHKb++8lVAsZnA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gDw2daNt5lkGVjH1hfrF3ieaJ3KnJYtQIJHq88IWjcSVFDod6/uOUWb4ZdnvD9Bom5CbVTbbl2H81xY/OrOWP3UWkQfXW/C3/r0oHJjnhUazV4MWEjl9xI+Bd2aonoQ7uIKTCl0lBn10c+fvbqFO2xldUJ54oVjXBSFztfNKo8M= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr3274836buc.1181823286465; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.158.11 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14989d6e0706140514i2d36f30dx111031c3106708e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0000 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <64547.192.168.125.138.1181757142.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706121851.57408.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <14989d6e0706130225j52a883a0rd772e7154ce3d470@mail.gmail.com> <64547.192.168.125.138.1181757142.squirrel@webmail.dfwlp.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kde@mail.kde.org Subject: Re: cannot select arts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:14:48 -0000 On 13/06/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > > On 13/06/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > >> cc: freebsd-questions: > >> > > [...] > >> is there somewhere in kde that i can specify that i want arts to be an > >> available option to multimedia apps? > > > > Applications need to be built with arts-Support, so I guess that this > > is missing on your second box. cd to a directory of one of the ports > > in question, and do a make config to check wether arts-support is > > available and selected, or not. > > > > HTH > > Christian > > > > well, i went into the x11/kde3 port, and did a 'make config-recursive', and > checked over every config file that would come into play during the kde3 build. > the only one that named anything for arts, was x11/kdebase3. which, i did an > unisntall, and reinstall of that port with: > > [X] ARTSWRAPPER Suid wrapper for aRts, req'd for realtime prio > > but amarok still sees no arts options for putput plugin. there is also no arts > options in the amarok config. > > i love the fact that using ports/packages-6-stable, i can do 30 hours of work in > just a few, but i am secumbing to the notion that i may have to come back and > just rebuild kde the old fasioned way :( i dont' think that this will make a difference. Where do you look for arts output? Amarok: Settings -> Configure Amarok -> Engine -> Xine -> Output plugin? BTW: Why do you want arts so badly? Amarok works just fine when using the OSS ouput plugin, for example. So there's no need to use arts at all. Same is valid for all other multimedia apps, too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 12:58:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48716A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from ns.uni-svishtov.bg (ns2.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C93E13C455 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from mail.uni-svishtov.bg (grinch.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.9]) by ns.uni-svishtov.bg (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5ECx5Fv080204 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:59:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) Received: from localhost (mail.uni-svishtov.bg [195.20.24.9]) by mail.uni-svishtov.bg (8.13.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5ECuURW021428 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:56:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lalev@uni-svishtov.bg) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:56:30 +0300 From: Angelin Lalev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6ada66569e2a4926a0b98f80a3388ea9@uni-svishtov.bg> X-Sender: lalev@uni-svishtov.bg User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE,SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP autolearn=no version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.uni-svishtov.bg Subject: Can freebsd-update update kernels with option IPFIREWALL_FORWARD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:58:10 -0000 Greetings, Several weeks ago I tried to change the way my FreeBSD servers are updated. Instead of the lengthy procedure of building FreeBSD from sources, I tried to use freebsd-update. On two of the servers, I ran into a problem. Obviously GENERIC kernel with ipfw module loaded couldn't provide the functionality of a kernel, compiled with IPFIREWALL_FORWARD option. So I've returned to my old ways of updating, but I forgot the crontab entry which invoked freebsd-update. To my surprise, yesterday I received a message, that said that updates are downloaded for my kernel (currently FreeBSD 6.2p3 - yeah, I'm lazy ...). Does this mean that freebsd-update team builds kernels with IPFIREWALL_FORWARD now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:03:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89B816A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BBD13C46C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5ED5AE3015241; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5ED30f6000833; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:03:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: Garrett Cooper References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:03:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Wed\, 13 Jun 2007 23\:11\:50 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:03:08 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> I have used FreeBSD for years and still hate to see this lack of >> support by others :-( > Again, read my response and do some research before you blame > nVidia. Blame nVidia.. Can you tell me why there's no 64bits nVidia driver for FreeBSD? I know there is a 32bits one. I used it on fbsd too. It used to need special settings (agp). Use of nvidia driver comes first hand, so what kind of research do you mean? If I upgrade my solaris box it starts 64bits on AMD or 32bits on a 32b machine. Including Xorg-7.2; including the nVidia driver (all 64bits). You can download it on the nVidia site. But not for FreeBSD. And that's what I 'hate' (like I wrote). What's the fault in that reasoning? Linux and solaris are better supported and that's a pity. > The nv driver works better than the vesa driver IMO -- it provides > much better 2D support than the vesa driver. Absolutely. But nVidia beats the hell out of the nv driver. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:10:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF5416A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A5B13C45A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CA2A0639; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:10:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:10:45 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eduardo Viruena Silva References: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> In-Reply-To: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:10:50 -0000 Written by Eduardo Viruena Silva on 06/13/07 21:07>> > > Hello Guys, > > I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, > built-in in my computer's motherboard. > My motherboard is D945NT. > > I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated > it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. > > Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. > > I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it > seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 > > I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. > I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. > > ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. > > The problem seems to be that X is > trying to find /dev/agpgart, according > to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: > > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family > Graphics Controller > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 > (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G > (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" > (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 > (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 > (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was already clear > (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. > (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) > (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is > available > for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. > (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte > > I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, > /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, > and it seems to me that it is not a problem > of memory allocation. > > so... > > What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? > > My kernel has > > device agp > > present. > > Thank you in advance. > > Eduardo. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It looks to me like you don't have working dri/drm. You have to have direct rendering working before you can get beryl working. AFAIK, drm support for your chipset is not available in 6.1-RELEASE, and the drm module is what provides the agpgart device. sys/dev/drm/drm_pciids.h on 6-STABLE from about February shows this: #define i915_PCI_IDS \ {0x8086, 0x3577, 0, "Intel i830M GMCH"}, \ {0x8086, 0x2562, 0, "Intel i845G GMCH"}, \ {0x8086, 0x3582, 0, "Intel i852GM/i855GM GMCH"}, \ {0x8086, 0x2572, 0, "Intel i865G GMCH"}, \ {0x8086, 0x2582, 0, "Intel i915G"}, \ {0x8086, 0x2592, 0, "Intel i915GM"}, \ {0x8086, 0x2772, 0, "Intel i945G"}, \ {0x8086, 0x27A2, 0, "Intel i945GM"}, \ {0, 0, 0, NULL} So you have to have the i915 module loaded to use this chipset. Though the i915 driver was ported for 6.1-RELEASE there was no Makefile included, and it never really worked until after 6.2-RELEASE. Personally, I'm tracking 6-STABLE and I've had drm working with an i845G since February of this year when anholt MFC'd a load of i915 drm changes. See this log for more info: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:15:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADCE16A46C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734D613C469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070614131551.TAJH3934.mta11.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:15:51 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:15:47 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: apache deining robots.txt 404 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:15:52 -0000 I just moved FBSD 6.2 / apache-1.3.37.1 into production. In the httpd-access,log I see all the search engines requests for robots.txt getting a 404 code. The previous production world was FBSD 6.0 /apache-1.3.33_2 and all the search engines requests for robots.txt got a 200 code. I use the same httpd-conf in both. So the only thing changed is the version of FBSD and apache. Has anybody else noticed this? How can I allow robots.txt to be handled like before?? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:37:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEE416A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3112A13C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2007 09:37:27 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id IUA24401; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:37:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2007 09:37:23 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18033.17556.553298.109291@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:37:24 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:37:28 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk writes: > Blame nVidia.. Can you tell me why there's no 64bits nVidia > driver for FreeBSD? Check the archives of ports@ (I think) within the last ten days. There's a substantive discussion - including contribution from the relevant person at nVidia - as to why. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:39:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EA516A46D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF6C13C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so975859pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=TBN4c/9ru/mQUk29uH4KLq+UJDJvORiR+FPK+zMbs9fU8eBb5UmNMpm9at+untSYTYvBbMpy90nhWfXmTck18FSpXQ53qHjFS9JwC2dHBfE9QCRHd2LUuIvy6bk7XRFcoYirqbUu1zOfJ4DP84aUe3mgRD3G14dIi24lefEqKZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=pyoBD5fOSYD06KQnxszbnnNkB2Xv9//wjVD1IcI6PKC+NsdnU2MThZ4Xfh1lRHOPJ0ZUvNpeAFUMGj5/JEXRp+vgHHigI2LlzET7EM71IzvNNIajzSSG/DhZn3b5h/YFBIpgfJhyvbH1A6hdeqSN5w3ha0b1loCdMDi/SFc1li0= Received: by 10.35.99.14 with SMTP id b14mr3217253pym.1181828372372; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706140639p714f45cfi29975cd710493a30@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:39:32 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "illoai@gmail.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup (the verdict is in) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:39:33 -0000 The verdict is in! The problem was heat. Before swapping out memory, I turned on the system to see what the fan was doing. Nothing was the answer. It wasn't spinning at all. I went digging through my old hardware and found a fan of the right type and dimensions that fit nicely, and more importantly worked. So, before swapping out memory I tried it. The build of cvsup-without-gui still failed, but not due to a hang or sig11 problems. It died for something else, and since I'm just going to use csup, I'm not going to worry about it. After updating my ports and source trees with csup, I successfully completed a compile of vim (to include gvim which required X to be compiled and installed). And then I successfully completed a "make buildworld" of the sources. Tonight, I'm going to rebuild the kernel and do the installs. I can eliminate some of the confusion everyone was having when I said it was a K6 700mHz CPU. It wasn't a K6 at all. When I pulled off the heat sink, I saw that the chip was stamped "Duron." I had seen 700mHz on either the BIOS or the dmesg output during boot, and because the case had a K6 sticker on it, assumed that was the CPU type. At any rate, I want to thank everyone for the great suggestions especially that link to the sig 11 stuff for gcc compiling. That was very informative. Looks like everything is working ok now. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:47:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A3816A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD60313C46E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so19043nfb for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sdYFxEaGzZx0UX/EJHHCFeGHBYGyND066t79Vx/boeri6j+6AW2pIGBUjAFaeMhyUIDBxkjsbPM11fRGIyuZALW0tKW8FSNsy8O1mNXLuVElBPa5oAbn6ZzHxb6cKKVm3ms1nY9JR40AU8MzoUXo1ZCe+egppU5Gvn7QeIrOA8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T6ZJhKGI02VJJ37mWAU07uTLZZC5A6VckGZn9NIRk23ZnkK0MwYolT7ydt6E1EMMUJWHXOnToDhH/KNnW+1+RKZYqxQopGcoD8gJbpCT1bdgEwi51qMmPWw+kALjFSldzApyyMRCYEgjW+YbDUtNpNt57oEWX70UokUMWoCJ6IQ= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr3438653buc.1181828871255; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [89.78.30.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5sm4721197nfh.2007.06.14.06.47.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <467146FE.9010406@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:47:42 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070523) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bob@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: apache deining robots.txt 404 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:47:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Bob wrote: > I just moved FBSD 6.2 / apache-1.3.37.1 into production. > In the httpd-access,log I see all the search engines requests for robots.txt > getting a 404 code. > > The previous production world was FBSD 6.0 /apache-1.3.33_2 and all the > search engines requests for robots.txt got a 200 code. > > I use the same httpd-conf in both. So the only thing changed is the version > of FBSD and apache. > Has anybody else noticed this? > How can I allow robots.txt to be handled like before?? After [1]: % 10.4.5 404 Not Found % % The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI [...] It means you just don't have robots.txt in www root directory. HTH, Karol [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html - -- Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGcUb+ezeoPAwGIYsRCBSDAJ9eYxO81wc4a/QopZnexGXEklpL2QCfWixR zb1Zh0Dlg533kpipNrgWswM= =TmMc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 14:18:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1541716A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C2513C448 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id AAA16204; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:18:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:18:38 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Andrew Falanga In-Reply-To: <340a29540706130632m289285dfi595442a6269e1645@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fresh install won't compile requirement libraries for cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:18:50 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Andrew Falanga wrote: > On 6/13/07, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:38 -0600 Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > > > a hard hang. Nothing worked. I could not even Alt+ to a > > > different pseudo terminal. The system just hard hanged. I rebooted > > > and tried the install again with the same result. > > > > At the same place? If so, I'd tend to suspect memory rather than cpu. > > No it did not stop at the same place. I still suspect memory versus > the cpu, especially considering that, apparently, there were several > generations of the K6. I didn't know this. For several years, I did > not have the time or money to play with hardware and therefore lost > touch with much of the hardware that was out there. Andy, you're making me remember stuff I thought I'd about done with :) > > > I'm wondering if it could be hardware, specifically memory. I've > > > never seen a FreeBSD, OpenBSD or Linux (for that matter) hard hang on > > > program compilation apart from hardware problems. Also of particular > > [..] > > > System configuration is as follows: > > > > > > AMD K6 700mHz > > > 256mb RAM (PC 133) > > > 13gb HDD > > > > 700MHz? Please show us the line from your /var/run/dmesg.boot showing > > the exact cpu and clock. This will also indicate features & stepping I'm still curious .. > > That's a K6-2, though it doesn't say so there. From memory, the fastest > > ever K6-2 was ~550MHz, but people did tend to wildly overclock them .. 525MHz, on reflection. I built a box for a friend on a budget and went for the 450, which another friend had managed to screw up to about 600 with a huge heatsink and fan/s. These were Gigabyte mobos with 100MHz FSB - I see you've been pointed to wikipedia re that - and PC133 RAM, and both 'mine' are still rocking 8 years on, running standard spec .. I'm still rather awed to hear 700MHz though, especially when you say: > pretty sure this was never over clocked. It was the secretaries > computer of the church I attend. I'm working on remaking the system > into a web server as the secretary was just given a laptop. You'll need to find out the motherboard make/model and google up its manual to have any chance of resetting bus speed / clock divider and such. There's another whole trip about setting the cpu core voltage for different speeds; overclocking these beasts involved black magic to which whole websites were/are fanatically dedicated, gamer folks mostly. > > If you really are running it at 700MHz (at what bus speed setting?) then > > I'd treat it to a new heat sink with fresh thermal paste and a BIG fan. > > Ok, sounds good. I'll see what I can find for this CPU. Seeing you'll want to replace the no doubt well dried out thermal paste anyway, K6-2s are clearly marked with notional speed and model numbers. > > And sure it's best to run matched-speed memory. Your BIOS probably lets > > you play with wait states and such, but the basic PCI bus speed might be > > something weird if you've managed to crank the cpu up to 700MHz .. > > How do wait states relate to memory speed? Please enlighten me. I > have an idea, but I'm only theorizing, I'd like to know what it really > means. If it's more in depth than one would like to type in a > response, sending a link is fine. I learned quite a bit on the "Sig > 11" links given earlier. This is drifting well past getting FreeBSD to behave under load on it, but I googled "AMD K6 wait states" and got heaps of hits, including the above. Basically, wait states delay the processor long enough to read or write to comparatively slow memory devices; better to wait than burn. You mentioned later trying some 100MHz memory, but you'll either need a slower bus speed than 100MHz (or more / some wait states) for that, and would be better off finding more PC133 RAM. Dumpster diving, anyone? :) Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 14:42:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B94316A485 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5E613C45E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5EEat4m018730; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:36:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5EEat0c018729; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:36:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:36:55 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Stevan Tiefert Message-ID: <20070614143655.GB18613@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1181769588.38379.4.camel@vagabund.w33> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1181769588.38379.4.camel@vagabund.w33> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not add a partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:42:02 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0200, Stevan Tiefert wrote: > Hello list, > > I left a little bit space left in my slice during the installation. Now > I wanted to use this left space to create a gbde-partition. > > When I use sysinstall and create in menu "Label" a new partition and I > hit "W" to write my changes to disk an error appears, that label didn't > created the partition I wanted. > > My question is why can I not add a partition in my existing slice? On > what should I take care maybe? > You are probably booted to that slice. You cannot (properly) write to the label of the device you are booted to. So, trying booting from the install CD and bring up the fixit and do it from there. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:02:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAD716A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC2113C48C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1028675pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=b5zSjKvTBFgViol+qbsKo8tNTLLbVM74BxUXbfKURrsd8xqF9VYraRur25cBtzOkc5teZ/9d3PTd5O/DkZfXi9POrZorbsOc2b/6713uoVG0qhLZ0Mc8cEXsbvkDIt5wtd0e84TDNcemq1M5XriHQZoty7clAfbHsKM+2klzm4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=d28rJmUv+AN8TtKWH5nidYWFXqfSS+AWtSAWZW/u6zHqNbl1KfDYIaNO4jX3ShU+aDGCsf8mAvgGRFJmJjZErqw9lKC0UsAqg+SPsYOUL7CvkawXxNYG2fu0c9fpy+Eb/0C3Y3Vd1Nqy1W9CBbAG/EwusgW8/BaynJKxlqjd5tU= Received: by 10.35.98.3 with SMTP id a3mr3331144pym.1181833348575; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:02:27 -0700 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:02:29 -0000 I'm trying to get samba working in a test environment. I do not need great functionality, so I'm going off of the simple setup stuff in the Handbook. This should be enough. I've configured my /usr/local/etc/smb.conf file for a single share (the /tmp share) and changed the workgroup name and set passwd backend = smbpasswd; I then tried to start samba with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start. After this, I get only, "Removing stale Samba tdb files: done." The handbook shows that I should see, Starting SAMBA: removing stale tdbs : Starting nmbd. Starting smbd. I then tried "sockstat" and did not see any listening sockets for the daemon "smbd." I don't know if I would, but I wanted to try this. I'm not convinced at this point that I'm actually getting samba to start. How can I verify this? I'm trying to add users to the smbpasswd file using smbpasswd, but this is to no avail. What am I doing wrong? Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:26:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4617916A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F19113C45B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id BAA17851; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:24:31 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:24:31 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20070614024343.10ff6632@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: bob@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache access log shows these attack requests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:26:23 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:20 -0400 > "Bob" wrote: > > Hi Bob, please learn how to quote in a reply to a message - it's pretty hard to > figure out who's written what otherwise. So much so, it's easier to respond to Bob via yours :) > > I checked with ls -l command and I have no pages 7036 in size. > > (hmm... does those bytes include the headers et al ? if they do, then u should > be looking for something else other than 7036 in the filesystem...anyway... Static pages do show the actual file size, checking here, but of course any dynamic content (php or whatever) makes size indeterminate. Bob, check the size shown as served for your ordinary "/" page requests? > > My question > > is why is apache servicing a request for "\x04\x01", this is not a valid > > request in first place. > > maybe if you show us your apache config it would be easier to figure out what > you allow or not. To make it simpler, the DEFAULT config in apache (with no > mod_proxy) is quite secure wrt access to / . If not too much modified, a 'diff apache.conf.installed apache.conf' might be less wieldy and easier to grok .. You do and will regularly see all sorts of tricks tried, aimed at various vulnerabilities, mostly on M$ systems, and life's too short to get too bothered by the 'background radiation' .. trust the security teams (both apache and freebsd) to post about and deal with new vulns. > > You wrote "because I disallow 'no referrer' > > plus 'no browser' ("-" "-") connects from non-local addresses, blocking > > heaps of rogue robots" > > Could you give me a example of the httpd.config coding you used for this? > > These denied requests get logged in the access.log, I would think they > > should be logged in the error.log. > > well, they are not an error from apache's POV, are they? they get served OK :) > therefore, access. (the fact that you dont like it doenst make it less "correct" > for Apache ;) Yeah. Anything invoking a 40[0-9] response, among other things, makes it to the error log, but even errors usually send some sort of response, and if in doubt (eg on would-be proxy requests) apache will serve "/" For Bob and the other fellow asking: it's all in the Fine Manual apache installed for you of course, but for simple illustration something like: BrowserMatchNoCase "Yet Another Illbehaved Robot" go_away SetEnvIfNoCase Referer nastysukkas\.biz go_away BrowserMatch "Windows 98\) XX" go_away SetEnvIf Remote_Addr 254.231.132.* go_away [..] # we only want to exclude those with neither (no_ref being usually ok) # meanwhile, till finding out how .. just 'no browser' is disallowed # SetEnvIf Referer "^$" no_ref=1 SetEnvIf User-Agent "^$" no_bro=1 # (I never did work out how to express 'no_bro AND no_ref' ?) SetEnvIf no_bro 1 go_away # except of course allow local "-" "-" requests - add more friendlies .. SetEnvIf Remote_Addr my.ip.adr.ess !go_away [..] Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride AuthConfig # 18Mar02 - always allow, even for otherwise denied bots order allow,deny allow from all # Controls who can get stuff from this server. order allow,deny allow from all deny from env=go_away Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:39:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58216A473 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A6713C489 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037D1A062C; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:39:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:39:47 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:39:51 -0000 Written by Andrew Falanga on 06/14/07 10:02>> > I'm trying to get samba working in a test environment. I do not need > great functionality, so I'm going off of the simple setup stuff in the > Handbook. This should be enough. I've configured my > /usr/local/etc/smb.conf file for a single share (the /tmp share) and > changed the workgroup name and set passwd backend = smbpasswd; I then > tried to start samba with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start. After > this, I get only, "Removing stale Samba tdb files: done." The > handbook shows that I should see, > > Starting SAMBA: removing stale tdbs : > Starting nmbd. > Starting smbd. > > I then tried "sockstat" and did not see any listening sockets for the > daemon "smbd." I don't know if I would, but I wanted to try this. > I'm not convinced at this point that I'm actually getting samba to > start. How can I verify this? > > I'm trying to add users to the smbpasswd file using smbpasswd, but > this is to no avail. What am I doing wrong? > > Andy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Did you put 'smbd_enable="yes"' in /etc/rc.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:41:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875AC16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CC313C4F0 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0BFA062C; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:41:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <467161B7.9060806@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:41:43 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:41:46 -0000 Written by Reid Linnemann on 06/14/07 10:39>> > Written by Andrew Falanga on 06/14/07 10:02>> >> I'm trying to get samba working in a test environment. I do not need >> great functionality, so I'm going off of the simple setup stuff in the >> Handbook. This should be enough. I've configured my >> /usr/local/etc/smb.conf file for a single share (the /tmp share) and >> changed the workgroup name and set passwd backend = smbpasswd; I then >> tried to start samba with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start. After >> this, I get only, "Removing stale Samba tdb files: done." The >> handbook shows that I should see, >> >> Starting SAMBA: removing stale tdbs : >> Starting nmbd. >> Starting smbd. >> >> I then tried "sockstat" and did not see any listening sockets for the >> daemon "smbd." I don't know if I would, but I wanted to try this. >> I'm not convinced at this point that I'm actually getting samba to >> start. How can I verify this? >> >> I'm trying to add users to the smbpasswd file using smbpasswd, but >> this is to no avail. What am I doing wrong? >> >> Andy >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Did you put 'smbd_enable="yes"' in /etc/rc.conf? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry, that should read 'samba_enable="yes"' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:48:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE7016A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A69113C46A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5EFmVWV013536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:31 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5EFmUTU019342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4671634F.4060801@u.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:31 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.14.82833 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:48:33 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Garrett Cooper writes: > > >> Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> > > >>> I have used FreeBSD for years and still hate to see this lack of >>> support by others :-( >>> > > >> Again, read my response and do some research before you blame >> nVidia. >> > > Blame nVidia.. Can you tell me why there's no 64bits nVidia driver for > FreeBSD? I know there is a 32bits one. I used it on fbsd too. It used > to need special settings (agp). Use of nvidia driver comes first hand, > so what kind of research do you mean? > > If I upgrade my solaris box it starts 64bits on AMD or 32bits on a 32b > machine. Including Xorg-7.2; including the nVidia driver (all 64bits). > You can download it on the nVidia site. But not for FreeBSD. And > that's what I 'hate' (like I wrote). What's the fault in that > reasoning? Linux and solaris are better supported and that's a pity. > > >> The nv driver works better than the vesa driver IMO -- it provides >> much better 2D support than the vesa driver. >> > > Absolutely. But nVidia beats the hell out of the nv driver. > > Since you're not willing to do the research, I'll give you the reader's digest version. nVidia's waiting on FreeBSD to implement key features in the kernel in order to properly support the amd64 and i386 + PAE platforms, because memory mapping and access isn't there yet in the FreeBSD kernel. Does that satisfy you? Read the archives in ports@, hackers@, and current@ over the past couple months to discover more details. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 15:52:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A484A16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@south.co.uk) Received: from mail1.points2.com (mail1.points2.com [217.64.112.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C5F13C4B9 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@south.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.8] (82-69-22-148.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.22.148]) by mail1.points2.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBFC18B305 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:29:34 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: From: Martin Houlden Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:30:20 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Free BSD font X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:52:12 -0000 HI guys I currently run a Free BSD server using plesk 8.1 - not that this has =20= anything to do with my question! But i'm putting together a corporate ID for a charity, and have been =20 looking for a rounded font. So far i've tried the usual suspects =20 (VAG, arial & helvetica rounded) but not found anything that really =20 works. Can you let me know what font you've used for the main Free BSD logo =20 - I think it's really very nice and perfectly understated. Hope you can help, many thanks in advance Martin =EF=BF=BC South=C2=B0 collective thinking www.south.co.uk Martin Houlden t: 0845 644 7744 e: martin@south.co.uk Disclaimer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:32:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF3B16A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CCC13C4B8 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so759366uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:32:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TAEnylwcbfy9QhSzFeTFWHtjVTOamLMEuL+7BRVFtxo94YL9hrUsa31U6DXVp3gF2E04MJi0WK3niPLAldDl4Vz9cYUbiWzRLotUwEDlti95KhIuCBlnsaaJPzRgWgDTzvupBentxZBe5rQWyq8Nv3qz3mn4LIUVGQqHr9YpnHg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aNx87S9sSlSQV4/7CGo8GV9RIAXRTy2l9NtF5xnMwAB9rXdr6b+oWfUcGfo22j9BK+VUkfcuQgM3zHcREBoaGV4N0L9cejQW8/p7hKRBrbbBeskRpO4NFlImz5eO4FS8ka0xWKAwFkfVL1y9AF7hI0JZyl3oFEVzeRtP9b5zdLc= Received: by 10.66.240.12 with SMTP id n12mr2162530ugh.1181838741521; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.101.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0706140932m6870e41fsb13bf052de07efd4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:32:21 -0700 From: "Kevin Downey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:32:25 -0000 On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: > Written by Eduardo Viruena Silva on 06/13/07 21:07>> > > > > Hello Guys, > > > > I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, > > built-in in my computer's motherboard. > > My motherboard is D945NT. > > > > I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated > > it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. > > > > Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. > > > > I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it > > seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 > > > > I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. > > I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. > > > > ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. > > > > The problem seems to be that X is > > trying to find /dev/agpgart, according > > to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: > > > > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation > > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family > > Graphics Controller > > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 > > (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G > > (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" > > (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 > > (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 > > (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was already clear > > (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. > > (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. > > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) > > (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is > > available > > for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. > > (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte > > > > I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, > > /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, > > and it seems to me that it is not a problem > > of memory allocation. > > > > so... > > > > What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? > > > > My kernel has > > > > device agp > > > > present. > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Eduardo. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > It looks to me like you don't have working dri/drm. You have to have > direct rendering working before you can get beryl working. AFAIK, drm > support for your chipset is not available in 6.1-RELEASE, and the drm > module is what provides the agpgart device. > > sys/dev/drm/drm_pciids.h on 6-STABLE from about February shows this: > > #define i915_PCI_IDS \ > {0x8086, 0x3577, 0, "Intel i830M GMCH"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x2562, 0, "Intel i845G GMCH"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x3582, 0, "Intel i852GM/i855GM GMCH"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x2572, 0, "Intel i865G GMCH"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x2582, 0, "Intel i915G"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x2592, 0, "Intel i915GM"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x2772, 0, "Intel i945G"}, \ > {0x8086, 0x27A2, 0, "Intel i945GM"}, \ > {0, 0, 0, NULL} > > So you have to have the i915 module loaded to use this chipset. Though > the i915 driver was ported for 6.1-RELEASE there was no Makefile > included, and it never really worked until after 6.2-RELEASE. > Personally, I'm tracking 6-STABLE and I've had drm working with an i845G > since February of this year when anholt MFC'd a load of i915 drm > changes. See this log for more info: http://anholt.livejournal.com/34566.html in an email on may 19th anholt indicated that there is no working support for the 965G -- i'll unhook my oily pink mini-kimono, you kill him in honolulu -- www.thelastcitadel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:36:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B5116A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:36:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319D413C43E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2508EA062C; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:36:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46716E83.5020904@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:36:19 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> <467161B7.9060806@cs.okstate.edu> <340a29540706140907g2ea31624t29159c514049ed5c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706140907g2ea31624t29159c514049ed5c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:36:27 -0000 Written by Andrew Falanga on 06/14/07 11:07>> > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: >> Written by Reid Linnemann on 06/14/07 10:39>> >> > Written by Andrew Falanga on 06/14/07 10:02>> >> >> I'm trying to get samba working in a test environment. I do not need >> >> great functionality, so I'm going off of the simple setup stuff in the >> >> Handbook. This should be enough. I've configured my >> >> /usr/local/etc/smb.conf file for a single share (the /tmp share) and >> >> changed the workgroup name and set passwd backend = smbpasswd; I then >> >> tried to start samba with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba start. After >> >> this, I get only, "Removing stale Samba tdb files: done." The >> >> handbook shows that I should see, >> >> >> >> Starting SAMBA: removing stale tdbs : >> >> Starting nmbd. >> >> Starting smbd. >> >> >> >> I then tried "sockstat" and did not see any listening sockets for the >> >> daemon "smbd." I don't know if I would, but I wanted to try this. >> >> I'm not convinced at this point that I'm actually getting samba to >> >> start. How can I verify this? >> >> >> >> I'm trying to add users to the smbpasswd file using smbpasswd, but >> >> this is to no avail. What am I doing wrong? >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > Did you put 'smbd_enable="yes"' in /etc/rc.conf? >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> Sorry, that should read 'samba_enable="yes"' >> > > No, I do not want samba running all the time. Only in certain > situations. Apparently, the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba > {start,stop,restart} script does not start samba. I do not know why. > If I start smbd directly, it starts up and I can browse/connect using > smbclient. So, I think that the problem is fixed, for the most part. > I'm still wondering why the system didn't start when using the samba > script in the local rc.d directory. > > Oh, my user problem was due to the fact that the user I was trying to > add to samba didn't exist on the server yet. I had to do "pw useradd > ..." first. That's what I get for working on so many machines that I > can't keep track. > > Thanks, > Andy Don't forget to cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org The rc script at /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba follows the FreeBSD rcng scheme, if the rcvar 'samba_enable' is not set to 'yes', then the script will not start or stop the samba process. Run the script without any commands to see usage. To check the status of rcvars that control the script's behavior, run the script with the 'rcvar' argument; e.g. ~/> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba rcvar # samba $samba_enable=YES # nmbd $nmbd_enable=YES # smbd $smbd_enable=YES # winbindd $winbindd_enable=NO Note that nothign is stopping you from running smbd and nmbd manually, the rc control script simply automates the control of the daemon for you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:39:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCFE16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE1A13C455 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA2A06FD; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:39:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46716F58.3060800@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:39:52 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Downey References: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> <1d3ed48c0706140932m6870e41fsb13bf052de07efd4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0706140932m6870e41fsb13bf052de07efd4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:39:56 -0000 Written by Kevin Downey on 06/14/07 11:32>> > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: >> Written by Eduardo Viruena Silva on 06/13/07 21:07>> >> > >> > Hello Guys, >> > >> > I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, >> > built-in in my computer's motherboard. >> > My motherboard is D945NT. >> > >> > I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated >> > it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. >> > >> > Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. >> > >> > I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it >> > seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 >> > >> > I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. >> > I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. >> > >> > ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. >> > >> > The problem seems to be that X is >> > trying to find /dev/agpgart, according >> > to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: >> > >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family >> > Graphics Controller >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 >> > (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G >> > (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" >> > (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 >> > (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 >> > (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was already >> clear >> > (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. >> > (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. >> > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) >> > (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is >> > available >> > for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. >> > (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte >> > >> > I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, >> > /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, >> > and it seems to me that it is not a problem >> > of memory allocation. >> > >> > so... >> > >> > What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? >> > >> > My kernel has >> > >> > device agp >> > >> > present. >> > >> > Thank you in advance. >> > >> > Eduardo. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> It looks to me like you don't have working dri/drm. You have to have >> direct rendering working before you can get beryl working. AFAIK, drm >> support for your chipset is not available in 6.1-RELEASE, and the drm >> module is what provides the agpgart device. >> >> sys/dev/drm/drm_pciids.h on 6-STABLE from about February shows this: >> >> #define i915_PCI_IDS \ >> {0x8086, 0x3577, 0, "Intel i830M GMCH"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x2562, 0, "Intel i845G GMCH"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x3582, 0, "Intel i852GM/i855GM GMCH"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x2572, 0, "Intel i865G GMCH"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x2582, 0, "Intel i915G"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x2592, 0, "Intel i915GM"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x2772, 0, "Intel i945G"}, \ >> {0x8086, 0x27A2, 0, "Intel i945GM"}, \ >> {0, 0, 0, NULL} >> >> So you have to have the i915 module loaded to use this chipset. Though >> the i915 driver was ported for 6.1-RELEASE there was no Makefile >> included, and it never really worked until after 6.2-RELEASE. >> Personally, I'm tracking 6-STABLE and I've had drm working with an i845G >> since February of this year when anholt MFC'd a load of i915 drm >> changes. See this log for more info: > > http://anholt.livejournal.com/34566.html > in an email on may 19th anholt indicated that there is no working > support for the 965G > Thanks for the link to anholt's journal. This doesn't affect the 945G, though, right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:13:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F327416A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from just2cool36@msn.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22DC13C480 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from just2cool36@msn.com) Received: from BAY139-W1 ([64.4.43.36]) by bay0-omc1-s1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:01:07 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [83.100.203.65] From: Adam Hill To: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:01:07 +0100 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2007 16:01:07.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[37E791D0:01C7AE9D] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:40:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Which Version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:13:07 -0000 HiIt seems very confusing, I am looking for the correct version to use for = an old RM server, its a intel se7501br2 server board with a xeon processor.= We want try freebsd as a server for small networks. Can you advise which v= ersion to download? =20 just2cool36@msn.com _________________________________________________________________ 100=92s of Music vouchers to be won with MSN Music https://www.musicmashup.co.uk/index.html= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:51:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ACB16A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB913C45D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1098206pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a5MOdUxRcb6X3UAg4TaCLjnQqCIczNtrSumptpRVMTtiTM2DdMmqTwNgZCB72Mke/HBE6Y1eWkPOSVMPMLE7wUT39fnS1i6S12b3z11mNfnhKOIcziT/3eX84Kiws/sdN6BxMgSkZ1d1DuhdIEpml++QppICvhTyyxpdEKPScwo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V+897X9FStWbCsoq0tMmJfLrt864uzUglVwcqukS/csmB43G1i8+qVypp2iqyakCATvLUzTpR3BoWZtZ4Z48YCajzQ75GtpUYe2T7s4hrfsDQu0HXpPh65bVCBPvfBRD6wjGpJ3/R2fsv8OZL/rdmz7RSVPPG27uqcSTe5cKCzU= Received: by 10.35.93.1 with SMTP id v1mr3504417pyl.1181839884881; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706140951v58c6b039ve04089f9580718a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:51:24 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Reid Linnemann" In-Reply-To: <46716E83.5020904@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> <467161B7.9060806@cs.okstate.edu> <340a29540706140907g2ea31624t29159c514049ed5c@mail.gmail.com> <46716E83.5020904@cs.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:51:25 -0000 On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: > > Don't forget to cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Once again I apologize to the forum. I keep forgetting to do this. > The rc script at /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba follows the FreeBSD rcng > scheme, if the rcvar 'samba_enable' is not set to 'yes', then the script > will not start or stop the samba process. > > Run the script without any commands to see usage. To check the status of > rcvars that control the script's behavior, run the script with the > 'rcvar' argument; e.g. > > ~/> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba rcvar > # samba > $samba_enable=YES > # nmbd > $nmbd_enable=YES > # smbd > $smbd_enable=YES > # winbindd > $winbindd_enable=NO > > Note that nothign is stopping you from running smbd and nmbd manually, > the rc control script simply automates the control of the daemon for you. > Ah, thank you. Very enlightening. I guess I'll have to read through that section of the Handbook to make sure I understand how all that works together. I finally did get it working by starting the smbd "manually." Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 16:54:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B7E16A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CD113C455 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E9FA062C; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:54:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <467172C8.4090009@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:54:32 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070517) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> <46716143.1020409@cs.okstate.edu> <467161B7.9060806@cs.okstate.edu> <340a29540706140907g2ea31624t29159c514049ed5c@mail.gmail.com> <46716E83.5020904@cs.okstate.edu> <340a29540706140951v58c6b039ve04089f9580718a7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706140951v58c6b039ve04089f9580718a7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:54:35 -0000 Written by Andrew Falanga on 06/14/07 11:51>> > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: >> >> Don't forget to cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > > Once again I apologize to the forum. I keep forgetting to do this. > >> The rc script at /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba follows the FreeBSD rcng >> scheme, if the rcvar 'samba_enable' is not set to 'yes', then the script >> will not start or stop the samba process. >> >> Run the script without any commands to see usage. To check the status of >> rcvars that control the script's behavior, run the script with the >> 'rcvar' argument; e.g. >> >> ~/> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba rcvar >> # samba >> $samba_enable=YES >> # nmbd >> $nmbd_enable=YES >> # smbd >> $smbd_enable=YES >> # winbindd >> $winbindd_enable=NO >> >> Note that nothign is stopping you from running smbd and nmbd manually, >> the rc control script simply automates the control of the daemon for you. >> > > Ah, thank you. Very enlightening. I guess I'll have to read through > that section of the Handbook to make sure I understand how all that > works together. I finally did get it working by starting the smbd > "manually." > > Thanks, > Andy Hint: take a look at the rc(8) manpage. There's a good section on the behavior of the /etc/rc.d scripts, which is being adopted by the rc scripts for many ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 17:12:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785FC16A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CA613C465 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5EHAouk045642; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:10:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070614115846.0249a7f8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:10:40 -0500 To: cadastrosonline cadastrosonline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <306715.62215.qm@web57310.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Memory mannagment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:12:38 -0000 At 01:15 AM 6/14/2007, cadastrosonline cadastrosonline wrote: >First of all, > > > >"Each process has its own private address space. The address space is >initially divided >into three logical segments: text, >data, and stack. " You would be wise to read up on Processors and assembly language programming. The concept of segments is part of assembly language programming and often is built into CPU's. In the case of the intel 80x86 line this is very true. To answer the questions: text is usually program code, and should not be modifiable stack is temporary storage of program values and variables data is data for the program, this defines variable used in a program >But if the address is just something like 343556 then how does it >really work? The memory is divided into segments is that what it means? Segments are kept separated by the CPU, and some treatment of segments can be enforced with some CPU's. Text being non-modifiable is possible using some CPU's. Some data segments can be read only as well. To address memory locations vary by CPU and even by the mode the CPU is running in. Some are linear address, but not necessarily. >"The data segment contains the initialized and uninitialized data portions >of a program" In the case of a modifiable data segment, it will contain initialized data, and non initialized data. initialized data looks like: int i=5; versus uninitalized data: int j; >Is it talking about multithreading? I COULDNT FIND anything talking >about how freebsd deals with multithreading, just found out it does it >by man pthread. Threading is a separate topic. Segments and how they work predates multi-threading. >Tell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, does >it use any algorithm to substitute a page when out of pages in memory? >such as "second chance" "fifo" "lru" (last recently used) "nfu" (not >frequently used) and so on? I am studying freebsd but sometimes I am >out of ways to find out, yes I am reading the handbook about memory >mannagment as you can see my quotes but sometimes I don't understand. Memory management varies by CPU and operating system. You would need to research each implementation to understand how it is handled in each case. Memory management should be transparent to application programers, and usually is only required for those programing device drivers and other hardware level devices. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:09:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAA916A41F; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D0B13C45B; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5EI91tM027133; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:09:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Jin Guojun Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:03:46 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <466B2B9F.5010308@lbl.gov> <200706131001.25840.jhb@freebsd.org> <4670708A.5030805@george.lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <4670708A.5030805@george.lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706141403.47035.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:09:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3419/Thu Jun 14 09:49:39 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:09:06 -0000 On Wednesday 13 June 2007 06:32:42 pm Jin Guojun wrote: > Umm, the amount of physical memory has no bearing on how the virtual > address space for userland is laid out. Do you know what virtual memory > is and how it works? Your first e-mail seems to contradict this paragraph > as in your first e-mail you noted that the physical memory doesn't matter, > the solution was to not raise MAXDSIZ higher than 1GB and that is consist= ent > with running out of virtual address space due to MAXDSIZ reserving too mu= ch > address space for malloc(). > =20 > No quite clear on this. Does this mean that the MAXDSIZ cannot exceeed 1= GB=20 regardless > how many physical memory (say 16 GB) is installed? Then, this is=20 definitiely a software bug. > Then, somewhere the following checking is needed: > =20 > #if (MAXDSIZ > 1024 * 1024 * 1024) > #undef=A0=A0 MAXDSIZ > #define=A0=A0 MAXDSIZ=A0=A0 (1024 * 1024 * 1024) > #endif It depends on the app. Some apps you can crank the malloc space up a whole= =20 lot. Also, if you are running FreeBSD/amd64 and running a 32-bit binary=20 under freebsd32 emulation, then it has 4GB of VA space rather than 3GB, so= =20 you can give it more MAXDSIZ. It's really up to the user to only use a=20 maxdsiz that works. You can also adjust the hard limit before exec'ing a=20 process that needs a smaller dsize and leave MAXDSIZ larger for other=20 processes. Since it is dependent on things the compiler can't know about a= t=20 the build time of the kernel, we just let the user set it to whatever and i= f=20 they set it too high things break until they lower it. You can even set th= is=20 at boot time via 'kern.maxdsiz' tunable in the loader w/o needing to=20 recompile. =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:15:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4C716A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net [212.13.198.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBEF13C46C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from [10.10.4.10] (dragon.lancs.uk.alastria.net [88.96.139.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5EI333h043271 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:03:04 GMT (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Message-ID: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:02:58 +0100 From: Peter Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Flag: NO X-Virus-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.137 () RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Ultra-Flag: NO X-Spam-Low-Flag: NO X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-High-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 212.13.198.8 Subject: Installing 6.2 from a 5.3 mini install CD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:15:18 -0000 Good Afternoon, Does anyone have any knowledge, good or bad, about installing 6.2-RELEASE from a 5.3-RELEASE mini install CD? The story is that I have a 5.3-RELEASE CD in my colo server in London (which I have BIOS serial support w/ terminal server), and I know in the installer you can specify the release name. I've tried to do this in VMware, I did a custom install, set the release name to 6.2-RELEASE, installed only base. However as FreeBSD has enabled an option for a SMP kernel, it didn't install a kernel and thus failed to boot. I was contimplating if I could install the kernel as a package or a non named distribution. Is there anything I can do, or do I have to send a CD down and hope my provider doesn't charge me to much? This'll teach me for not buying a CD-RW when I buy a new server... "What will I need one of them for, it's a colo server.". Cheers, Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:17:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2774116A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC29213C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1148376pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IIF5EKF5N6MZQubeHNKjcaHXxpDeZ4YZVpFl4/0rLRF5a//41zn0M8S2lmNeG66OO0YtEfkBqjgffIubMlybL5ewr6tuKBGtsOaoHnA3gZtFr59kkLUBsQnbopgWUEjBaTp1VjOFbmKTJO9asC1RCXDwlHNTjH3AOpXBEP/KLNs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=phduCFVe0cZ1qBcWcrr6kqaCl+dJwkNhZzqLcj/mp0xp/nPzll9DWb3GXfDV8NVSGU9ivhQYFS+Gq/3Bwh6tif11WqPUlW/PdRaDEibRckCgw8gYivKSWsRddXsqVHTgRwRwNduKcaOxWdFg7yQ6XdEzvgsdilxiYLUesHc+N6c= Received: by 10.35.106.15 with SMTP id i15mr3638279pym.1181845063191; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:17:43 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: samba and IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:17:44 -0000 Hi, Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:21:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3885516A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A63513C45D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so786024uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fu1rEqCf61ITT5l5eQgPCCfpOSN4gq/BEtMv8YHJ3XgvgTbyG/hoE8ROMI4nQYEyYB8TOy8YEyq6DyOsv9B1MGhqt3uhH6XnkNZiHGTVls4i3cXm3/9IL44lMRIt6HQ27yF4xK9O53qiDNVEXUk3yw1ZTDsKzEWVQwjftE65htU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MUFMN55KSdJsNS5ruipe/o45QY2cHEy3N7bGZxxnSNGbK8xk+K5B71XTEHwwj1xEjHBrLhIGmZte4JprJSemD5aRW+fHQnUsUY2xupD1VKtVGmUi/AYA9tOMwulWfp3vltkHx/jfXoWsLuRd1ImQRJNh7s1Hyd8Ht/vEI0mc6xs= Received: by 10.66.243.4 with SMTP id q4mr2218174ugh.1181845316310; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.101.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0706141121u1997a58bodb81c1e3cd617588@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:21:56 -0700 From: "Kevin Downey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46716F58.3060800@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> <1d3ed48c0706140932m6870e41fsb13bf052de07efd4@mail.gmail.com> <46716F58.3060800@cs.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:21:59 -0000 On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: > Written by Kevin Downey on 06/14/07 11:32>> > > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: > >> Written by Eduardo Viruena Silva on 06/13/07 21:07>> > >> > > >> > Hello Guys, > >> > > >> > I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, > >> > built-in in my computer's motherboard. > >> > My motherboard is D945NT. > >> > > >> > I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated > >> > it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. > >> > > >> > Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. > >> > > >> > I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it > >> > seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 > >> > > >> > I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. > >> > I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. > >> > > >> > ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. > >> > > >> > The problem seems to be that X is > >> > trying to find /dev/agpgart, according > >> > to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: > >> > > >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation > >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family > >> > Graphics Controller > >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 > >> > (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G > >> > (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" > >> > (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 > >> > (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 > >> > (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was already > >> clear > >> > (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. > >> > (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. > >> > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) > >> > (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is > >> > available > >> > for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. > >> > (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte > >> > > >> > I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, > >> > /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, > >> > and it seems to me that it is not a problem > >> > of memory allocation. > >> > > >> > so... > >> > > >> > What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? > >> > > >> > My kernel has > >> > > >> > device agp > >> > > >> > present. > >> > > >> > Thank you in advance. > >> > > >> > Eduardo. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> It looks to me like you don't have working dri/drm. You have to have > >> direct rendering working before you can get beryl working. AFAIK, drm > >> support for your chipset is not available in 6.1-RELEASE, and the drm > >> module is what provides the agpgart device. > >> > >> sys/dev/drm/drm_pciids.h on 6-STABLE from about February shows this: > >> > >> #define i915_PCI_IDS \ > >> {0x8086, 0x3577, 0, "Intel i830M GMCH"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x2562, 0, "Intel i845G GMCH"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x3582, 0, "Intel i852GM/i855GM GMCH"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x2572, 0, "Intel i865G GMCH"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x2582, 0, "Intel i915G"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x2592, 0, "Intel i915GM"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x2772, 0, "Intel i945G"}, \ > >> {0x8086, 0x27A2, 0, "Intel i945GM"}, \ > >> {0, 0, 0, NULL} > >> > >> So you have to have the i915 module loaded to use this chipset. Though > >> the i915 driver was ported for 6.1-RELEASE there was no Makefile > >> included, and it never really worked until after 6.2-RELEASE. > >> Personally, I'm tracking 6-STABLE and I've had drm working with an i845G > >> since February of this year when anholt MFC'd a load of i915 drm > >> changes. See this log for more info: > > > > http://anholt.livejournal.com/34566.html > > in an email on may 19th anholt indicated that there is no working > > support for the 965G > > > > Thanks for the link to anholt's journal. This doesn't affect the 945G, > though, right? > Truth is best determined by examination of reality. If your 945G is working then I would say it is unaffected. -- i'll unhook my oily pink mini-kimono, you kill him in honolulu -- www.thelastcitadel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:22:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC4616A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [208.70.104.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A28F13C4C6 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 62082 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Jun 2007 18:22:46 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(208.70.107.100):. Processed in 6.500706 secs); 14 Jun 2007 18:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.210?) (steve@ibctech.ca@208.70.107.100) by pearl.ibctech.ca with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 18:22:39 -0000 Message-ID: <467186FB.9030608@ibctech.ca> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:20:43 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wood References: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> In-Reply-To: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing 6.2 from a 5.3 mini install CD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:22:47 -0000 Peter Wood wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > Does anyone have any knowledge, good or bad, about installing > 6.2-RELEASE from a 5.3-RELEASE mini install CD? > > The story is that I have a 5.3-RELEASE CD in my colo server in London > (which I have BIOS serial support w/ terminal server), and I know in the > installer you can specify the release name. > > I've tried to do this in VMware, I did a custom install, set the release > name to 6.2-RELEASE, installed only base. However as FreeBSD has enabled > an option for a SMP kernel, it didn't install a kernel and thus failed > to boot. > > I was contimplating if I could install the kernel as a package or a non > named distribution. Is there anything I can do, or do I have to send a > CD down and hope my provider doesn't charge me to much? > > This'll teach me for not buying a CD-RW when I buy a new server... "What > will I need one of them for, it's a colo server.". I don't know if this will help you or not, but just this morning, I had a 5.4-PRERELEASE box that was giving me major issues (#1 being I could not compile anything), so I did the binary upgrade from a 6.2 CD. It only did base the first time, and subsequently did not boot. I then booted off of the 6.2 CD, mounted the hard disk into /, then proceeded with install. Instead of selecting 'Minimal' for distributions, I went in and manually added the base, and the GENERIC kernel, after that, I was up and running. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:24:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0910F16A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com (a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com [64.72.68.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7D413C45B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org) Received: from mail.bsdwebsolutions.com ([64.72.68.15]) by a.outbound.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD Web Solutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1Hyu07-000Cfy-RC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:55 -0400 Received: from [64.72.66.117] (helo=mail.poughkeepsieschools.org) by mail.bsdwebsolutions.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1Hyu07-0007Rn-J5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:55 -0400 Received: from [10.20.0.10] (port=57480 helo=macpro-pcsd.techcentral.local) by mail.poughkeepsieschools.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (BSD WebSolutions, Inc.) (envelope-from ) id 1Hyu07-000HgL-E4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (authenticated as bcook@poughkeepsieschools.org); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:55 -0400 X-BSD-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.90.2/3419 on mail.poughkeepsieschools.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:24:55 -0400 Message-ID: <467187FC.30104@poughkeepsieschools.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:25:00 -0400 From: "B. Cook" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: syslog.conf questions.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:24:57 -0000 Hello all, I am trying to have different cisco routers log to a different log file. The log file is located on a 6.2 box running the stock syslogd. For what it is worth I have nine of these, only three are shown syslogd is running with -n -vv -d at the moment.. I did not have to specify -a 10.20.250.54:* to allow it to log.. (is that part of the problem..?) But the question is.. I do get logs from the respective hosts in the log files that I have specified, but I do not understand why syslogd is also catching them in the original local7.* /var/log/router/3620.log when as far as I can tell they are setup correctly. below is the relevant portions of the syslog.conf. [~]# 18 > egrep -v "#" /etc/syslog.conf | cat -n 1 2 +10.20.250.54 3 *.* /var/log/router/circle.log 4 -10.20.250.54 5 6 +10.20.250.42 7 *.* /var/log/router/columbus.log 8 -10.20.250.42 9 10 +10.20.250.38 11 *.* /var/log/router/clinton.log 12 -10.20.250.38 13 14 +10.20.0.10 15 *.* /var/log/router/tcentral.log 16 -10.20.0.10 17 18 *.err;kern.warning;auth.notice;mail.crit /dev/console 19 *.notice;authpriv.none;kern.debug;lpr.info;mail.crit;news.err /var/log/messages 20 security.* /var/log/security 21 auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log 22 mail.info /var/log/maillog 23 lpr.info /var/log/lpd-errs 24 ftp.info /var/log/xferlog 25 local7.* /var/log/router/3620.log 26 cron.* /var/log/cron 27 *.=debug /var/log/debug.log 28 *.emerg * 29 !startslip 30 *.* /var/log/slip.log 31 !ppp 32 *.* /var/log/ppp.log and with syslogd in debug mode I see this: and tcvthname(10.20.250.38) logmsg: pri 276, flags 0, from 10.20.250.38, msg 1262: Jun 14 18:13:04.770: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 2044 denied udp 10.20.18.28(1039) -> 10.20.0.212(161), 1 packet Logging to FILE /var/log/router/clinton.log Logging to FILE /var/log/router/3620.log cvthname(10.20.250.42) logmsg: pri 276, flags 0, from 10.20.250.42, msg 68: Jun 14 18:13:04.835: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 2044 denied udp 10.20.8.57(1040) -> 10.20.3.60(161), 4 packets Logging to FILE /var/log/router/columbus.log Logging to FILE /var/log/router/3620.log I do not understand why the local7.* is still getting caught.. From what I understood from the man page, the - tells it to stop logging from that host. Whatever the last 'host' entry is in the syslog.conf that host will not log into both files. from the 10.20.0.10 host I have configured syslog: local7.* @10.20.0.29 and when I run logger: date | logger -p local7.debug cvthname(10.20.0.10) logmsg: pri 277, flags 0, from 10.20.0.10, msg Jun 14 14:21:03 bcook: Thu Jun 14 14:21:03 EDT 2007 Logging to FILE /var/log/router/tcentral.log I get what I think I should.. Why do the previous entries not act the same as the last one? What am I missing? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:50:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7116A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E20D13C483 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5EIqusd016401 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:52:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5EIokNY000809; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:50:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200706140209.12134.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> <4670DC26.4070202@u.washington.edu> <4671634F.4060801@u.washington.edu> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:50:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4671634F.4060801@u.washington.edu> (Garrett Cooper's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 08\:48\:31 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: nvidia driver on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:50:53 -0000 Garrett Cooper writes: > Since you're not willing to do the research, I'll give you the > reader's digest version. nVidia's waiting on FreeBSD to implement > key features in the kernel in order to properly support the amd64 > and i386 + PAE platforms, because memory mapping and access isn't > there yet in the FreeBSD kernel. > > Does that satisfy you? I should have read the articles first. Lack of time due to daytime job. Thought a quick reply could do. That was wrong. I wrote to quickly. I can seet aht now. However, I _was_ willing to to the research when I had the time (it's almost weekend). So you're right. It's not nVidia, but a FreeBSD kernel problem. > Read the archives in ports@, hackers@, and current@ over the past > couple months to discover more details. Will do. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 18:53:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716EB16A46B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4728E13C4AD for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4819 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 18:53:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jun 2007 18:53:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 82B8228440; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:53:02 -0400 (EDT) To: "Andrew Falanga" References: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:53:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew Falanga's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 12\:17\:43 -0600") Message-ID: <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba and IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:53:04 -0000 "Andrew Falanga" writes: > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. There's a link on the Samba front page from last week. The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won't until Samba 4 (which has other changes for interoperating with Vista -- which is the first Windows to really do IPv6 well). There are patch sets around if you're willing to get your hands a bit dirty. Be well. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:07:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDB916A469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC99613C465 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EJ7Dvq000807 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:07 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (OT?) Anyone wanna address my ISP's issues? [CIDR/BGP question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:07:16 -0000 [OT Warning] Not related to FBSD, other than the use of ping(8), which is working as expected, apart from the fact that the network *isn't*. If anyone cares to give an opinion, TIA! I'm trying to get a land-based (DSL) solution to my rather remote office. Found a provider, they (supposedly) made arrangements with the local telco, sent me the DSL modem, etc. I set it up as instructed, but we're not getting TCP/IP here on it. Hours and hours of frustrating hold music on the telephone, WWW-chat sessions that get nowhere, etc. The modem "sync" is fine, but, as one tech put it, "sync but no surf". It's been this way for > 2 weeks. The DSL modem's outside (static) IP is n.n.n.70, the gw is n.n.n.69, and the mask is 255.255.255.252. From inside, I can ping .70, but not .69 (and, needless to say, nothing else, either). From the outside, it's the other way 'round. Traceroute (from outside) shows different endpoints for the two addresses (that is, the last hop before .69 is one router, and, when looking for .70, it's another router (but not the one that leads to .69)). If I did my CIDR homework correctly, the net is n.n.n.68/30. Using "BGPlay" (http://bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay/), I get the message: "The selected data sources have no information on prefix n.n.n.68/30. Please check that this prefix is globally announced." My question: shouldn't it be 'announced', if the ISP intends to route me TCP/IP traffic? I apologize for my ignorance, but BGP isn't something I figured to need to know at this point in my life (although, it doesn't hurt to learn, usually).... Thanks again, Kevin Kinsey -- Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything. -- George Bernard Shaw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:22:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C81416A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D3513C465 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so676678mue for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B63zHljzFQBpkp9JQ7/LuuAD58fzj1LADuCpg197c6cUQxr4XlYcxNeJQIBobl/dOJSHnDBYuLyMjcyEHLVMBwKtiBGsHtNlLAakbd0XSMruWnbukPPxrdX0pI9q70xjwIRurKi4QERKg7xeqlU47MWWcBaQXWETyZCwsyZ2+To= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h9WTxPYw/RvnTRqj6QmnnUI6EJrBRW+KYa9q4mswJ2PM8T+xRJKRPlpBziEvn7GDhz264YNMxtQj9y0xqFvV3uLvwUPKvhPkU3BE6ZLuTI6nSSUMZ1m44AuVxHVrnse4bovNeEXu+4wagHPy+C5DnnmT0ilRVi1jhIs2y++RCvQ= Received: by 10.82.151.14 with SMTP id y14mr2011609bud.1181848926045; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:22:06 -0400 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Adam Hill" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:22:08 -0000 On 14/06/07, Adam Hill wrote: > HiIt seems very confusing, I am looking for the > correct version to use for an old RM server, its > a intel se7501br2 server board with a xeon proces- > sor. We want try freebsd as a server for small net- > works. Can you advise which version to download? Well, having looked at intel's brilliantly informative website, I can understand your confusion. For all they tell you it could be an overclocked 8088. But seriously, a 533MHz FSB makes me suspect it is 32-bit, and so you would want the "i386" version. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:39:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA6416A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFAB13C447 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1195063pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZTsaiYU6u2xDFR7zU9IRzUG1HbiFb8/tDPpiLwMUQlcjHxmfHzMLHP/kktn59lwy+Kly1HIFy3VsUJyAyXtdszb2oF7UdBEjRZnNBh+hkCQp4IPHk2krQxl8ZDnIGeoRAUrcfCTeC6idp7Raa1WdySyAay0FD+xXDABquZdZx98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YeONgvs9b+Inx1yhBhw8OU3sQxw0qMsvxAH0iMOtioQ2o1e+lrLvaBvJXUY4ZCxxvc6oonpg3y8gYeuF+ZLZgjN+nx9Huahhsi/wfKaLBbS0WMKuEs95kU2TJA51i+dddtOiV/MW5VXJzOFZACKJmL7J2Gwx6Unb5F/4HE7Tk40= Received: by 10.35.19.6 with SMTP id w6mr3731305pyi.1181849969129; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:39:29 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba and IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:39:30 -0000 On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Andrew Falanga" writes: > > > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information > > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link > > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. > > There's a link on the Samba front page from last week. > The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won't > until Samba 4 (which has other changes for interoperating with > Vista -- which is the first Windows to really do IPv6 well). > There are patch sets around if you're willing to get your hands > a bit dirty. Nope, don't mind getting my hands dirty (I do most of the work on my automobiles too). However, I take it from this that because I must get my hands dirty, none of these patches are in the ports system? I ask because I noticed as I installed vim last night that many patches were downloaded along with the main vim tar-ball. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:45:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A242116A46F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5955713C45D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EJj2PU001079; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:45:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <46719AB8.4030800@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:44:56 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: efinleywork@efinley.com References: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: (OT?) Anyone wanna address my ISP's issues? [CIDR/BGP question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:45:09 -0000 Elliot Finley wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:07 -0500, you wrote: > >> >> The DSL modem's outside (static) IP is n.n.n.70, the gw >> is n.n.n.69, and the mask is 255.255.255.252. From >> inside, I can ping .70, but not .69 (and, needless to say, >> nothing else, either). From the outside, it's the >> other way 'round. Traceroute (from outside) shows different >> endpoints for the two addresses (that is, the last hop >> before .69 is one router, and, when looking for .70, it's >> another router (but not the one that leads to .69)). >> >> If I did my CIDR homework correctly, the net is n.n.n.68/30. >> Using "BGPlay" (http://bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay/), I get >> the message: "The selected data sources have no information on >> prefix n.n.n.68/30. Please check that this prefix is globally >> announced." >> >> My question: shouldn't it be 'announced', if the ISP intends >> to route me TCP/IP traffic? I apologize for my ignorance, >> but BGP isn't something I figured to need to know at this >> point in my life (although, it doesn't hurt to learn, usually).... > > anything smaller than a /24 will be filtered. The ISP would announce > the larger block that your /30 lives in. Thank you very much, Elliot; You wouldn't believe how hard it's been to get anyone at, err, "tech support", to even address the issue. It makes sense, I suppose, otherwise the global routing table would be much larger than it is (?) Anyone up for further questions? The .70 --> .69 route on the modem has a metric of "5", but with the .252 mask, shouldn't it be required to be one hop away? Guess I need to head back to "class", Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:50:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AD916A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [66.111.113.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5475C13C468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from efinley04.etv.net ([74.214.237.51] helo=science3.efinley.com) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Hyut1-000Obo-MK; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:21:39 -0600 From: Elliot Finley To: Kevin Kinsey Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:21:39 -0600 Organization: Emery Telcom Message-ID: References: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: (OT?) Anyone wanna address my ISP's issues? [CIDR/BGP question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: efinleywork@efinley.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:50:46 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:07 -0500, you wrote: >[OT Warning] Not related to FBSD, other than the use of >ping(8), which is working as expected, apart from the fact >that the network *isn't*. > >If anyone cares to give an opinion, TIA! > >I'm trying to get a land-based (DSL) solution to my >rather remote office. Found a provider, they (supposedly) >made arrangements with the local telco, sent me the DSL >modem, etc. I set it up as instructed, but we're not >getting TCP/IP here on it. Hours and hours of frustrating >hold music on the telephone, WWW-chat sessions that get >nowhere, etc. The modem "sync" is fine, but, as one tech >put it, "sync but no surf". It's been this way for > >2 weeks. > >The DSL modem's outside (static) IP is n.n.n.70, the gw >is n.n.n.69, and the mask is 255.255.255.252. From >inside, I can ping .70, but not .69 (and, needless to say, >nothing else, either). From the outside, it's the >other way 'round. Traceroute (from outside) shows different >endpoints for the two addresses (that is, the last hop=20 >before .69 is one router, and, when looking for .70, it's >another router (but not the one that leads to .69)). > >If I did my CIDR homework correctly, the net is n.n.n.68/30. >Using "BGPlay" (http://bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay/), I get >the message: "The selected data sources have no information on >prefix n.n.n.68/30. Please check that this prefix is globally >announced." > >My question: shouldn't it be 'announced', if the ISP intends >to route me TCP/IP traffic? I apologize for my ignorance,=20 >but BGP isn't something I figured to need to know at this=20 >point in my life (although, it doesn't hurt to learn, usually).... anything smaller than a /24 will be filtered. The ISP would announce the larger block that your /30 lives in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 19:54:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DF216A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA5E13C487 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 9805 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 19:54:53 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jun 2007 19:54:53 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 933AE28440; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:54:51 -0400 (EDT) To: "Andrew Falanga" References: <340a29540706141117o3584f1adid95e240fcbabcd72@mail.gmail.com> <44645q74hd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:54:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <340a29540706141239xa30c41fnff8b2bb1f31a9489@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew Falanga's message of "Thu\, 14 Jun 2007 13\:39\:29 -0600") Message-ID: <44abv22tx0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: samba and IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:54:54 -0000 "Andrew Falanga" writes: > On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> "Andrew Falanga" writes: >> >> > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information >> > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link >> > in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6. >> >> There's a link on the Samba front page from last week. >> The short version is that it doesn't do it yet, and probably won't >> until Samba 4 (which has other changes for interoperating with >> Vista -- which is the first Windows to really do IPv6 well). >> There are patch sets around if you're willing to get your hands >> a bit dirty. > > Nope, don't mind getting my hands dirty (I do most of the work on my > automobiles too). However, I take it from this that because I must > get my hands dirty, none of these patches are in the ports system? I As far as I can see, they are not. > ask because I noticed as I installed vim last night that many patches > were downloaded along with the main vim tar-ball. You could talk to the maintainer about that. Samba4 probably isn't ready to be added to the ports system anyway, but patches against Samba3 seem to exist also. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 20:05:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DAD16A46B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [66.111.113.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDBF13C4BC for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from efinley04.etv.net ([74.214.237.51] helo=science3.efinley.com) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HyvZM-000JJn-LT; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:05:24 -0600 From: Elliot Finley To: Kevin Kinsey Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:05:24 -0600 Organization: Emery Telcom Message-ID: References: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> <46719AB8.4030800@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <46719AB8.4030800@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: (OT?) Anyone wanna address my ISP's issues? [CIDR/BGP question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: efinleywork@efinley.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:05:25 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:44:56 -0500, you wrote: >Elliot Finley wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:07 -0500, you wrote: >>=20 > >>> >>> The DSL modem's outside (static) IP is n.n.n.70, the gw >>> is n.n.n.69, and the mask is 255.255.255.252. From >>> inside, I can ping .70, but not .69 (and, needless to say, >>> nothing else, either). From the outside, it's the >>> other way 'round. Traceroute (from outside) shows different >>> endpoints for the two addresses (that is, the last hop=20 >>> before .69 is one router, and, when looking for .70, it's >>> another router (but not the one that leads to .69)). >>> >>> If I did my CIDR homework correctly, the net is n.n.n.68/30. >>> Using "BGPlay" (http://bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay/), I get >>> the message: "The selected data sources have no information on >>> prefix n.n.n.68/30. Please check that this prefix is globally >>> announced." >>> >>> My question: shouldn't it be 'announced', if the ISP intends >>> to route me TCP/IP traffic? I apologize for my ignorance,=20 >>> but BGP isn't something I figured to need to know at this=20 >>> point in my life (although, it doesn't hurt to learn, usually).... >>=20 >> anything smaller than a /24 will be filtered. The ISP would announce >> the larger block that your /30 lives in. > >Thank you very much, Elliot; You wouldn't believe how hard it's been >to get anyone at, err, "tech support", to even address the issue. >It makes sense, I suppose, otherwise the global routing table=20 >would be much larger than it is (?) > >Anyone up for further questions? The .70 --> .69 route on the >modem has a metric of "5", but with the .252 mask, shouldn't it >be required to be one hop away? We really need further information to debug/diagnose this problem. I'll give you a diagnosis for two different scenarios. #1) you are using private addresses on your LAN and your DSL modem/router is NATting for you: possible problems: Your modem/router isn't routing. ( this is more common than it should be. we replace customers' routers because of this problem regularly.) Your ISP has fat fingered a netmask - most likely changing a .252 to a .255. #2) you are using public addresses on your LAN and your DSL modem/router is just routing for you: possible problems: Same possibilities as above with the addition of: Your ISP has *not* put the route in for your public block of IPs. Your ISP *HAS* put the route in for your public block of IPs, but for whatever reason, that route isn't propagating through their network. Those will be the most likely problems. I'm betting on your modem being faulty. Elliot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 20:36:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDF916A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:36:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BFB13C46C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1227713pyi for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:36:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=nrr6eqLKMeCuA+eXUvMQxJz53PHBhmYMi4x0B/iUN8mzghXWNEpy+j5sWgCVvsrB0N60gkBqb1gj2CmUBPk7j8gXyVMdYsh0xnCowXCPQG+V+9V1w5wmHMsOIZcBDa1c9iGZr487ZYcHw5rgvo/eJ419ClqzVoPpDIJeG4NLtzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VLlGLoW6oH+BdueEReP0S8VIaLG6U6YaZSmJRYlfpjOwoIyY6eEasuGkiF9ywb4g5bYkzZGMecU8sAtxUgZbJuSUHQZO2Uev5v61kQDLTpTdXiIwSrye8hXff8aHRTcDNvjQuTh8DrNLm4fK18ZmHHpZ270ZEAjGBwOQbPzZ5OI= Received: by 10.78.150.7 with SMTP id x7mr900463hud.1181853400376; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.194.12 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:36:40 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pf(4) + fetch(1) + http://ftp.gnu.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:36:42 -0000 Hello, There is one strange thing going on with this combination. I saw this many times by now: when fetch(1) is trying to download something from http://ftp.gnu.org, it is hanging after a very small amount of data; sometimes on 0%. After disabling pf(4), fetch(1) is not hanging any more, so I guess that the problem is somewhere in my pf.conf. Here is it: ---- pf.conf -- begin --- ext_if = "em0" icmp_types="echoreq" # don't filter on the loopback interface set skip on lo0 set block-policy return scrub all no-df random-id reassemble tcp # setup a default deny policy block all # activate spoofing protection for the internal interface. antispoof quick for lo0 inet # pass tcp, udp, and icmp out on the external (Internet) interface. # keep state on udp and icmp and modulate state on tcp. pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 65522 keep state pass in inet proto icmp all icmp-type $icmp_types keep state pass out on $ext_if proto tcp all modulate state flags S/SA pass out on $ext_if proto {udp, icmp} all keep state ---- pf.conf -- end --- Any idea what's wrong here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 20:57:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC7316A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0523313C448 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA8B8DA544; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id CA7461006A; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:57:21 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807124-a0ec8bb000000801-c0-4671abb165fd Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 4F6551004D; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:57:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <61C453CD-4FCE-4B99-8CF2-F666E5292F76@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:57:20 -0700 To: Vlad GURDIGA X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf(4) + fetch(1) + http://ftp.gnu.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:57:22 -0000 On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > There is one strange thing going on with this combination. I saw this > many times by now: when fetch(1) is trying to download something from > http://ftp.gnu.org, it is hanging after a very small amount of data; > sometimes on 0%. After disabling pf(4), fetch(1) is not hanging any > more, so I guess that the problem is somewhere in my pf.conf. Here is > it: Presumably you want to make sure that fetch(1) is using: FTP_PASSIVE_MODE If set to anything but `no', forces the FTP code to use passive mode. ...or else your firewall is probably going to block active-mode FTP data traffic. See "man 3 fetch". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:17:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F35216A46B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3304B13C4B0 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5ELH3pw015590; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:17:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l5ELH1Me015587; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:17:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:17:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Peter Wood In-Reply-To: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> Message-ID: <20070614150944.J15552@wonkity.com> References: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:17:03 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing 6.2 from a 5.3 mini install CD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:17:14 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Peter Wood wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > Does anyone have any knowledge, good or bad, about installing 6.2-RELEASE > from a 5.3-RELEASE mini install CD? > > The story is that I have a 5.3-RELEASE CD in my colo server in London (which > I have BIOS serial support w/ terminal server), and I know in the installer > you can specify the release name. > > I've tried to do this in VMware, I did a custom install, set the release name > to 6.2-RELEASE, installed only base. However as FreeBSD has enabled an option > for a SMP kernel, it didn't install a kernel and thus failed to boot. > > I was contimplating if I could install the kernel as a package or a non named > distribution. Is there anything I can do, or do I have to send a CD down and > hope my provider doesn't charge me to much? > > This'll teach me for not buying a CD-RW when I buy a new server... "What will > I need one of them for, it's a colo server.". Install 5.3 (minimal), then cvsup sources to 6.2, then build and install from source. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:30:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A107216A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@parodius.com) Received: from mx01.sc1.parodius.com (mx01.sc1.parodius.com [72.20.106.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9080913C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@parodius.com) Received: by mx01.sc1.parodius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CC5D1CC044; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:14:20 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: ExTaZyTi Message-ID: <20070614211420.GA57881@eos.sc1.parodius.com> Mail-Followup-To: ExTaZyTi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with "installworld" in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:30:10 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote: > My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error > > ===> bin (install) > ===> bin/cat (install) > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin > strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted > install: wait: Operation not permitted > *** Error code 70 Could be caused by some filesystem mount options you've got set, maybe incorrect permissions on /bin (no execute bit?), or possibly a secure runlevel setting (which I believe was the cause of your last issue you reported here). -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:32:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421B16A46D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4371713C469 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so173775anc for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=EZGSZTChfVMZX9at7HVrUfqEvdma/PAIH8bGMQioULUXCemug1vcdSWYNX0H4op8F5bA98MwBwHFaICGs/8mscugn0ngZ4+coarjVmZJdCgYWWgzPCMKraMv3nhxJmowciWXv4Yg0XkVU49A63fy8ye61Q5G3GbUz9guIZtNkgo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rrcf8vUY4c3f/3WuQUga41YF/s1zOjVZptIAIy+WSPkl5tXP5P3NP9WjYA+T09xkOAr0DTw1+U1KobjEt7FGo1yDhF4ia2zmGFH+5x1414WZvIldD4mnwFieZzFUcsmMed0C5ddIlH2hySxmSsGwduxNqtqgJrv7vt+FsRQgRBI= Received: by 10.100.124.5 with SMTP id w5mr1421292anc.1181855260682; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.8 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:07:40 +0300 From: ExTaZyTi To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Problem with "installworld" in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:32:53 -0000 Hi, My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error ===> bin (install) ===> bin/cat (install) install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted install: wait: Operation not permitted *** Error code 70 Stop in /usr/src/bin/cat. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. If someone can help me. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:39:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A5416A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiran.patil@intel.com) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCAC13C483 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiran.patil@intel.com) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2007 14:11:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,422,1175497200"; d="scan'208,217";a="256981029" Received: from orsmsx334.jf.intel.com ([10.22.226.45]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2007 14:11:12 -0700 Received: from orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.89]) by orsmsx334.jf.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:11:12 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:11:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4AFE4AEEFA305C4BB82F73F4D819506001B50C43@orsmsx420.amr.corp.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Need help with GNU assembly Thread-Index: AceuyIhW+953RM4pSvCdPuSGGeoTyg== From: "Patil, Kiran" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2007 21:11:12.0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[89371850:01C7AEC8] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Patil, Kiran" Subject: Need help with GNU assembly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:39:43 -0000 Hi All, =20 I am trying to use GNU assembly. I am trying simple thing such as , moving content of memory location into general purpose register (ax). =20 I have following code : =20 struct context { =20 unsigned long mask[8]; } CONTEXT; =20 int main() { CONTEXT sr; sr.mask[5] =3D 0x8FED; =20 __asm ( "movw %0, %ax" : : "m" (*(unsigned short*)sr.mask[5]) ); return 0; } =20 Compiler complains with error "bad substitution directive in asm instruction". =20 I tried changing the code something like this : =20 __asm ( "movw %0, %ax" : : "m" (*(unsigned short*)sr.mask+5) ); =20 Still error is same, then I tried following: =20 Unsigned short* ptemp =3D &sr.mask[5]; __asm ( "movw %0, %ax" : : "m" (*(unsigned short*)ptemp) ); But still no luck, compiler reported same error as mentioned above =20 Any help is appreciated. Please let me know where I am mistake. =20 Thanks, -- Kiran P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 22:02:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AA416A46C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AF513C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA750DF640; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:04:15 +0200 From: cpghost To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070614220415.GA92111@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Subject: gimp-2.2.15,2 crashes after gtk-2.10.13 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:48 -0000 After upgrading gtk-2.10.12_2 to gtk-2.10.13, gimp keeps crashing with the following error message: The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. (Details: serial 57475 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) (script-fu:80640): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error This can be easily reproduced by starting gimp, creating a new window, and trying to draw something into it: immediate crash with the error message above. serial # can chage, but everything else remains the same. Nothing else except the gtk upgrade changed in-between port trees as of 2007-06-12 and 2007-06-14, including the version of gimp (gimp-2.2.15,2, gimp-app-2.2.15_1,1), which didn't change either. The only change was gtk-2.10.12_2 to gtk-2.10.13. Incidentally, the jumpy gtk savebox doesn't repeatedly grow and shrink horizontally anymore under fluxbox now: the gtk upgrade seems to have fixed this; but now gimp is borked. Can anyone else confirm this bug, perhaps with other Gtk2 apps? Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 22:11:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96F416A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7151813C45D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5EMARa7020810; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5EMARVV020809; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:10:27 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20070614221027.GA20786@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <467182D2.6050303@alastria.net> <20070614150944.J15552@wonkity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070614150944.J15552@wonkity.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Peter Wood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing 6.2 from a 5.3 mini install CD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:11:01 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:17:01PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Peter Wood wrote: > > >Good Afternoon, > > > >Does anyone have any knowledge, good or bad, about installing 6.2-RELEASE > >from a 5.3-RELEASE mini install CD? Well, I can't now remember, but at some time along there, a new filesystem was included and by using the old CD you might not be getting it if it was added after your 5.3 version. Check the release notes. Otherwise you should be able to make it work with some judicious use of cvsup. ////jerry > > > >The story is that I have a 5.3-RELEASE CD in my colo server in London > >(which I have BIOS serial support w/ terminal server), and I know in the > >installer you can specify the release name. > > > >I've tried to do this in VMware, I did a custom install, set the release > >name to 6.2-RELEASE, installed only base. However as FreeBSD has enabled > >an option for a SMP kernel, it didn't install a kernel and thus failed to > >boot. > > > >I was contimplating if I could install the kernel as a package or a non > >named distribution. Is there anything I can do, or do I have to send a CD > >down and hope my provider doesn't charge me to much? > > > >This'll teach me for not buying a CD-RW when I buy a new server... "What > >will I need one of them for, it's a colo server.". > > Install 5.3 (minimal), then cvsup sources to 6.2, then build and install > from source. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 22:17:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB7316A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB2513C458 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5EMHEKQ002197; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:17:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4671BE64.1060806@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:17:08 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: efinleywork@efinley.com References: <467191DB.2010709@daleco.biz> <46719AB8.4030800@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: (OT?) Anyone wanna address my ISP's issues? [CIDR/BGP question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:17:23 -0000 Elliot Finley wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:44:56 -0500, you wrote: >> Anyone up for further questions? The .70 --> .69 route on the >> modem has a metric of "5", but with the .252 mask, shouldn't it >> be required to be one hop away? > > We really need further information to debug/diagnose this problem. > I'll give you a diagnosis for two different scenarios. > > #1) you are using private addresses on your LAN and your DSL > modem/router is NATting for you: This is the case. > possible problems: > > Your modem/router isn't routing. ( this is more common than it should > be. we replace customers' routers because of this problem regularly.) We RMA'ed it already, it's the second box and same issues. :-( Do you mean it should be doing NAT, or routing outside (e.g., RIP)? I assume the latter? > Your ISP has fat fingered a netmask - most likely changing a .252 to a > .255. Well, not in the visible DSL modem's config. Possibly somewhere else? > #2) you are using public addresses on your LAN and your DSL > modem/router is just routing for you: > possible problems: > > Same possibilities as above with the addition of: > > Your ISP has *not* put the route in for your public block of IPs. Granted it's "not the case", but: I was of the opinion that maybe they hadn't for the one block we're supposed to be in, thus my question re: BGP for the 68/30 CIDR, but, per your answer, I've no way to know unless they tell me since the route isn't publicized. > Your ISP *HAS* put the route in for your public block of IPs, but for > whatever reason, that route isn't propagating through their network. Obviously I couldn't say about that. I'm thinking it's still all about routing. Problem is it's possibly more complex, since the local Telco has the DSLAM and the ISP is just "leasing" over the top. Whenever they get on the phone with each other, I can only imagine the finger-pointing going on. AFAIK, the local telco doesn't actually offer DSL from the local C.O., so it could be as simple, <> as someone actually going in the building and plugging some cable into the DSLAM, or punching a couple of buttons on said machine. OTOH, it could be a matter of someone with enough route-foo with either AT&T or the ISP actually doing a lot of investigation and configuration. > Those will be the most likely problems. I'm betting on your modem > being faulty. Well, hopefully not anymore. Maybe somebody *smart* will take up my case. Should I have 'em call you ;-) ?? Thanks (very much! .. once) again, Kevin Kinsey PS > Hah! Substitute "ISP" for "C.I.A." below.... -- Finding out what goes on in the C.I.A. is like performing acupuncture on a rock. -- New York Times, Jan. 20, 1981 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 23:14:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE07A16A41F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBD713C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 29230 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 19:14:06 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2007 19:14:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4671CBBD.2020001@queue.to> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:14:05 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost References: <20070614220415.GA92111@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20070614220415.GA92111@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gimp-2.2.15,2 crashes after gtk-2.10.13 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:14:08 -0000 cpghost wrote: > Can anyone else confirm this bug, perhaps with other Gtk2 apps? Confirmed. Here's what I got cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ gimp The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. (Details: serial 29407 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ (script-fu:4359): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 23:57:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3C216A400 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2594113C487 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5ENw0g4027315; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:58:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Howard Goldstein In-Reply-To: <4671CBBD.2020001@queue.to> References: <20070614220415.GA92111@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <4671CBBD.2020001@queue.to> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vPh3VAGjJpiv/kIdj6zj" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:57:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1181865442.35746.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: cpghost , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gimp-2.2.15,2 crashes after gtk-2.10.13 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:57:30 -0000 --=-vPh3VAGjJpiv/kIdj6zj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:14 -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote: > cpghost wrote: > > Can anyone else confirm this bug, perhaps with other Gtk2 apps? >=20 > Confirmed. Here's what I got >=20 > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ gimp > The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error. > This probably reflects a bug in the program. > The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. > (Details: serial 29407 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0) > (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; > that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. > To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line > option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful > backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error()=20 > function.) > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ > (script-fu:4359): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error >=20 > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ See the freebsd-x11@ archives. There is a bug in libX11 that is causing this. A patch can be found in the bug to fix this problem. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-vPh3VAGjJpiv/kIdj6zj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGcdXhb2iPiv4Uz4cRAgMJAJ0W3OYfrRsJiUt7rMXcSYpo515t6ACfaICF iKsJP673czAgyYPPguZT0O4= =kopu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vPh3VAGjJpiv/kIdj6zj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 00:04:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6E16A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: from web23301.mail.ird.yahoo.com (web23301.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.189.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FF9D13C468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan_tiefert@yahoo.de) Received: (qmail 83396 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jun 2007 23:37:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=NaP8sJzJn3MhisCfO4ROWz5NhPNnpzJQTPGPYhhbHaTjMbxGkLsiGJnjn4KI/qiLzjyjxz6jXC8NHD+pyHsZ6ZPwe1gtcLVxapZP2gO+k2DTzq++ZjGPlZxWMv1yZ5EJUjG8ccCzzxhuXhBjWM/ppvIjbp99qy54hMW30f+7Q2c=; X-YMail-OSG: LPMFGasVM1mpm4iGzhTYJO6ICK7p8gYcUDMbs3oOae177.EWcHVtx8.VKMV5YoXhjP7B365QfQFRWs7S4s5I0.mf9oidQJ.CJg-- Received: from [84.165.80.207] by web23301.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:37:17 CEST Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:37:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Stevan Tiefert To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20070614143655.GB18613@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <76294.82290.qm@web23301.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can not add a partition [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:04:00 -0000 --- Jerry McAllister schrieb: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:19:39PM +0200, Stevan > Tiefert wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > I left a little bit space left in my slice during > the installation. Now > > I wanted to use this left space to create a > gbde-partition. > > > > When I use sysinstall and create in menu "Label" a > new partition and I > > hit "W" to write my changes to disk an error > appears, that label didn't > > created the partition I wanted. > > > > My question is why can I not add a partition in my > existing slice? On > > what should I take care maybe? > > > > You are probably booted to that slice. You cannot > (properly) > write to the label of the device you are booted to. > So, trying booting from the install CD and bring up > the fixit > and do it from there. > > ////jerry > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thanks! Such a simple thing. That was nowhere documented. Thanks again! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:57:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A09916A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@messier.com) Received: from mainstreet.net (noc.mainstreet.net [207.5.0.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B04D13C455 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@messier.com) Received: from [204.69.218.217] (cache.mainstreet.net [204.69.218.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by mainstreet.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5ELvmuA097618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@messier.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Messier Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:57:41 -0700 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:55:25 +0000 Subject: password file migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:57:49 -0000 I know this has been covered before, but the search mechanism at the mailing list archive doesn't seem to work (zero matches for the word: password). I've got a 5.3 system and a 6.2 system. I want to migrate the user accounts from the 5.3 to the 6.2. They use different encryption mechanisms for the password in master.password. Other that running a cracker, is there a way to upconvert the old to the new? Thanks, -mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 02:02:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C012D16A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5EF13C4C6 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BEB1A3C1A; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EF5513BC; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67B91BE98; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:02:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Messier Message-ID: <20070615020222.GA96262@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: password file migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:02:24 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:57:41PM -0700, Mark Messier wrote: > > I know this has been covered before, but the search mechanism > at the mailing list archive doesn't seem to work (zero matches for > the word: password). > > I've got a 5.3 system and a 6.2 system. I want to migrate the user > accounts from the 5.3 to the 6.2. They use different encryption > mechanisms for the password in master.password. > > Other that running a cracker, is there a way to upconvert the > old to the new? They are backwards compatible formats, so why do you want to change? If you are concerned that the old password hash is insecure (if it's an ancient DES password, this is true), then you will need to generate a new password for each affected account. One way to do this is by using password expiry to force a change on next user login (see e.g. pw(8)). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 06:09:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFAD16A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF55E13C468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurdiga@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so860623uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:09:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Bbwn8NbxFeM4WgzMZH/vPbRG7VeK/ec++YyIyW4rFki87sC2iUu5ddpYfT16iLb5qStVn3dEIIeUtXUiRk8HajRZGLWlfUJYPfuDdvVn4d+0YNoEAd6aWq/uw+unHoEw9WiZRdNFl2WXTXQqEjZILKP0eLrS3db6U7UetZVS82E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EPMdarL/0vSsX+Oas560s8KoE5zFhXkH7A2MuW/cb0s82FOxOZ9NwJe6Jk7vTUMvXgkt25lRALtvKXGBA6l33wS+zzPdOEirz0Ih091RdCLl9w9JUTd0zgH/ZbF8Da3giEIvzN69Ec1XjiP6rf66m+TybMKmNT+baAsbNGw+S+A= Received: by 10.78.175.14 with SMTP id x14mr1084573hue.1181887775393; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.194.12 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:09:35 +0300 From: "Vlad GURDIGA" To: "Chuck Swiger" In-Reply-To: <42285E31-082F-449D-B105-7E43D6A64D8C@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <61C453CD-4FCE-4B99-8CF2-F666E5292F76@mac.com> <42285E31-082F-449D-B105-7E43D6A64D8C@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf(4) + fetch(1) + http://ftp.gnu.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:09:37 -0000 On 15/06/07, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 14, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: > >> Presumably you want to make sure that fetch(1) is using: > >> > >> FTP_PASSIVE_MODE If set to anything but `no', forces the FTP > >> code to > >> use passive mode. > > > > Just in case, I have checked my environment and FTP_PASSIVE_MODE is > > set to "yes". I'm saying "just in case" because the downloads were > > from "http://ftp.gnu.org", not from "ftp://ftp.gnu.org", I mean the > > HTTP protocol was used, not FTP. > > Hrm, missed that part, or perhaps just ran with the ftp.gnu.org > hostname implying FTP access. :-) > > I might watch out for the "no-df" entry to your scrub line, as it is > probably breaking PMTUd: I thought about it too and ran a test with that line commented out, but it did not help. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_MTU_discovery > > -- > -Chuck > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:27:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3137D16A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E111A13C45D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so203652anc for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:27:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kQZ1R/S1Cbbiz3MhIHa/k82SP2jxBshrzC588OcNOahf4goQJUCGiKdA8DilBetXi6iKyIWVHJuNMkwb3P74tJiXKCObhNbLbB9/UJCNgYcAhwv56lTsrgh7EvImqYNC7cV0vTSZw1jmRdhlC3k+5f8NEL+m1Q70dCDr0G6F8c8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=njRtUbiLN8Q2B8FYqskYgIC8kAqhJ0+pWf92CAwrv18FmrNuvquNkHLCl2wC4GRogRa1e0F/L/MgWeIoadp2Eqy/bupstiXUqLgAZjQvJE9EMFZa0/GIPDFRhWuIo0B6xx7pTrxpdTzIIiMZq1FyEC/EisGxgcCgPt1/uRE4Qfg= Received: by 10.100.202.13 with SMTP id z13mr140992anf.1181892422253; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468d29450706150027n5d68c46cq17fd32c7b0c208f5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:27:02 +0300 From: ExTaZyTi To: ExTaZyTi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070614211420.GA57881@eos.sc1.parodius.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> <20070614211420.GA57881@eos.sc1.parodius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Problem with "installworld" in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:27:03 -0000 kern.securelevel: -1 and the permessions on /bin and / is the correct :[ 2007/6/15, Jeremy Chadwick : > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote: > > My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the > error > > > > ===> bin (install) > > ===> bin/cat (install) > > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin > > strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted > > install: wait: Operation not permitted > > *** Error code 70 > > Could be caused by some filesystem mount options you've got set, maybe > incorrect permissions on /bin (no execute bit?), or possibly a secure > runlevel setting (which I believe was the cause of your last issue you > reported here). > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:40:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03DE16A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E713C48C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hz6Pi-0005Su-CW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:40:10 -0700 Message-ID: <11134620.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:40:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Ofloo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: bulk@ofloo.net References: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> Subject: Re: password file migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:40:11 -0000 I did the same thing a long time ago and i just created used pwd_mkdb, and it worked fine. Though i'm not entirely sure what this has to do with this topic. Mark Messier wrote: > > > I know this has been covered before, but the search mechanism > at the mailing list archive doesn't seem to work (zero matches for > the word: password). > > I've got a 5.3 system and a 6.2 system. I want to migrate the user > accounts from the 5.3 to the 6.2. They use different encryption > mechanisms for the password in master.password. > > Other that running a cracker, is there a way to upconvert the > old to the new? > > Thanks, > -mark > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11134620 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:44:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CB216A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:44:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F140913C487 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so204547anc for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:44:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KFsY9lcsmHbjRYZtZU3K6rFO7tb49jLfBxxWle90vVC7aQ2UFf25TvLVRGNx9+mkVqYglCkOrWEh+pBfjZFxG6i/PSFB5Mdx9D/X0mqghbCqdhbepRyKDT8eH85tAxhW5hcW6OpkdzMvmBO+NcNlTvDksocPB6zm/Jk594RHq9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=m3P9ARu7pgaK1HjPIBGvJZAobbd7OFn3jLVrjmSsNjagS005yG5w1EcmLt1kXyanUBEAfvGb6PVqLgyFLK4PV5DOA8t9papdGc0yhihFKM5O6eClmayV2oQz+orCV0TcuTpigWAYHA+kRVQicPr/w8hkdDjLWu8/kZ+AaDWTZuk= Received: by 10.100.13.12 with SMTP id 12mr1634196anm.1181893494168; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468d29450706150044m23adb605hf5835cf97fce7ded@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:44:54 +0300 From: ExTaZyTi To: ExTaZyTi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <468d29450706150027n5d68c46cq17fd32c7b0c208f5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> <20070614211420.GA57881@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <468d29450706150027n5d68c46cq17fd32c7b0c208f5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Problem with "installworld" in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:44:55 -0000 I do chflags noschg /bin and its work :) 2007/6/15, ExTaZyTi : > > kern.securelevel: -1 and the permessions on /bin and / is the correct :[ > > 2007/6/15, Jeremy Chadwick : > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:07:40AM +0300, ExTaZyTi wrote: > > > My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the > > error > > > > > > ===> bin (install) > > > ===> bin/cat (install) > > > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin > > > strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted > > > install: wait: Operation not permitted > > > *** Error code 70 > > > > Could be caused by some filesystem mount options you've got set, maybe > > incorrect permissions on /bin (no execute bit?), or possibly a secure > > runlevel setting (which I believe was the cause of your last issue you > > reported here). > > > > -- > > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com| > > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/| > > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA > > | > > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB > > | > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:48:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A8116A46C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [82.208.36.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEF313C448 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B7C19E054; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:48:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AA219E053; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46724441.7040405@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:48:17 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ExTaZyTi References: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <468d29450706141407u6a4538fbgcb9d3d58b1550e28@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with "installworld" in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:48:05 -0000 ExTaZyTi wrote: > Hi, > > My problem is with the installing new world in my system, this is the error > > ===> bin (install) > ===> bin/cat (install) > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 cat /bin > strip: /bin/sthZDAzl: Operation not permitted > install: wait: Operation not permitted > *** Error code 70 > > Stop in /usr/src/bin/cat. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/bin. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > If someone can help me. Thanks in advance. It could be caused /tmp is mounted with noexec, or by securelevel settings. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:50:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D9A16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6445013C46C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5F7ovmA029672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:50:57 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5F7ouV7011751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:50:57 -0700 Message-ID: <467244DD.9060809@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:50:53 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ofloo References: <10840247.post@talk.nabble.com> <11093482.post@talk.nabble.com> <7CDA68DA-A40D-4A6A-B9D7-1AFF589E9316@messier.com> <11134620.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <11134620.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.15.2933 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: password file migration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:50:58 -0000 Ofloo wrote: > I did the same thing a long time ago and i just created used pwd_mkdb, and it > worked fine. > > Though i'm not entirely sure what this has to do with this topic. > > > Mark Messier wrote: > >> I know this has been covered before, but the search mechanism >> at the mailing list archive doesn't seem to work (zero matches for >> the word: password). >> >> I've got a 5.3 system and a 6.2 system. I want to migrate the user >> accounts from the 5.3 to the 6.2. They use different encryption >> mechanisms for the password in master.password. >> >> Other that running a cracker, is there a way to upconvert the >> old to the new? >> >> Thanks, >> -mark >> Simply running mergemaster (part of the recommended upgrade errata) should do the trick, as it will prompt you to execute some commands to 'upgrade' the password database and other relevant databases. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:51:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB816A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za (sirian.hst.org.za [209.203.2.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3504A13C46E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from localhost (localhost.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA01031DB4D; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:52:05 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sirian.hst.org.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sirian.hst.org.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44017-01; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:52:05 +0200 (SAST) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) by sirian.hst.org.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DB731DB2B; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:52:05 +0200 (SAST) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:55:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <340a29540706140802g662c38cepae1b597f18ebc020@mail.gmail.com> <46716E83.5020904@cs.okstate.edu> <340a29540706140951v58c6b039ve04089f9580718a7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706140951v58c6b039ve04089f9580718a7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706150955.13301.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hst.org.za Cc: Andrew Falanga Subject: Re: samba config problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:51:22 -0000 On Thursday 14 June 2007 18:51, Andrew Falanga wrote: > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: > > Don't forget to cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Once again I apologize to the forum. I keep forgetting to do this. > > > The rc script at /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba follows the FreeBSD rcng > > scheme, if the rcvar 'samba_enable' is not set to 'yes', then the script > > will not start or stop the samba process. > > > > Run the script without any commands to see usage. To check the status of > > rcvars that control the script's behavior, run the script with the > > 'rcvar' argument; e.g. > > > > ~/> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba rcvar > > # samba > > $samba_enable=YES > > # nmbd > > $nmbd_enable=YES > > # smbd > > $smbd_enable=YES > > # winbindd > > $winbindd_enable=NO > > > > Note that nothign is stopping you from running smbd and nmbd manually, > > the rc control script simply automates the control of the daemon for you. > > Ah, thank you. Very enlightening. I guess I'll have to read through > that section of the Handbook to make sure I understand how all that > works together. I finally did get it working by starting the smbd > "manually." > > Thanks, > Andy Just to add to this: if you want to start the service as a one-off without putting the enabling variable in /etc/rc.conf, use onestart instead of start (this also works with stop|onestop and status|onestatus). Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:57:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1815616A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B27F13C46A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: (qmail 23921 invoked by uid 503); 15 Jun 2007 07:31:08 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 15 Jun 2007 07:31:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail183.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 07:31:08 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 07:30:45 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (postmaster@oregnier.net@82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 07:30:44 -0000 Message-ID: <46724027.4070908@oregnier.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:30:47 +0200 From: Olivier Regnier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Subject: csh and echo syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:57:30 -0000 Hello, I'm running FreeBSD 6.2 and i use for the moment csh. When i test this command in console echo -ne "/dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0" >> /etc/fstab and with a cat /etc/fstab, i have this : -ne /dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0 The \t is not supported with a echo in csh ? What happened ? Thank you in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 09:33:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F4216A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chatlove@ukr.net) Received: from ffe3.ukr.net (ffe3.ukr.net [195.214.192.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FE813C447 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chatlove@ukr.net) Received: from mail by ffe3.ukr.net with local ID 1Hz7uH-000Gzr-MZ for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:49 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD-questions" From: "chatlove" X-Life: is great, enjoy it! X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net mPOP 3.3 X-Originating-Ip: [70.71.5.93] X-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070322 Firefox/2.0.0.3 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:49 +0300 Cc: Subject: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:33:13 -0000 Hi everybody, Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for my 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. Thank you in advance! Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 09:45:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED9816A46B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508E513C44B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5F9lBhA018886 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5F9ivQM000865; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:44:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:44:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: (chatlove@ukr.net's message of "Fri\, 15 Jun 2007 12\:15\:49 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:45:08 -0000 "chatlove" writes: > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent > they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is > highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for > my 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. Thunderbird Mail and News Claws-Mail (mail / news) KMail (kde mailreader) Pan (newsreader) -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 10:19:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E127A16A46F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0301113C4C1 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2007 10:19:38 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-230-060.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO p3-600) [88.72.230.60] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 12:19:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/mi9tiYRbmH93fIQDJH45KP2BZ1BArn17NtROvyW j/EHc101aS3Kqn Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:19:38 +0200 To: chatlove , FreeBSD-questions From: "Andreas Rudisch" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.21 (FreeBSD) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:41 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:15:49 +0200, chatlove wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent they > use > with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is highly desirable. > I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for my 8 years old son. > Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. I like these: ports/mail/sylpheed2/ ports/www/opera/ Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 10:28:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992D816A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F135D13C487 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: (qmail 30799 invoked by uid 503); 15 Jun 2007 10:28:52 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 15 Jun 2007 10:28:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail183.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 10:28:52 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 10:28:29 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (postmaster@oregnier.net@82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 10:28:28 -0000 Message-ID: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:29:02 +0200 From: Olivier Regnier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Subject: problem with sed command and csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:28:33 -0000 Hi everybody, Actually, i'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and csh shell. With a sh script, i trying to execute this command : sed -e "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf The result is not correct, i have an error : sed: 1: "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/M . . .": bad flag in subsitute command: 'n' Can you help me please ? Thank you in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 10:43:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398BF16A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net (galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0251813C483 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.10.181]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A42E0007AD; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:14:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <46726691.1010309@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:14:41 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Regnier References: <46724027.4070908@oregnier.net> In-Reply-To: <46724027.4070908@oregnier.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csh and echo syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0000 Olivier Regnier wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 6.2 and i use for the moment csh. When i test this > command in console > echo -ne "/dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0" >> > /etc/fstab > > and with a cat /etc/fstab, > i have this : -ne /dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0 > > The \t is not supported with a echo in csh ? What happened ? I'm not sure that any echo has ever supported special escape chars. Maybe it's some Gnu/Linuxism? /bin/echo does the same as csh echo and the man page mentions no -e flag. Try printf. printf %b "/dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0" Why aren't you adding a newline? Do your command twice and you have a broken fstab :-( printf %b "/dev/da0s1\t /mnt/usb\t msdos\t rw,noauto\t 0\t 0\n" would, imho, be the right incantation. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 11:06:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C1116A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CA113C4BD for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CBC1C8A33; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:05:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:04:46 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> In-Reply-To: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706151404.47348.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Olivier Regnier Subject: Re: problem with sed command and csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:06:01 -0000 On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Olivier Regnier wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Actually, i'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and csh shell. With a sh script, i > trying to execute this command : > sed -e "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => > 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > > The result is not correct, i have an error : > sed: 1: "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/M . . .": bad flag in subsitute command: > 'n' > > Can you help me please ? s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => This n is invalid--------------------------^^^ You should add a backslash before each slash that is not used as a separator for the s command. E.g. s/I want to substitute the \/ character/with the _ character/ s/\/\/\//three slashes/ You can also use a separator of choice for the s command. That is: s/foo/bar/ is equivalent to s@foo@bar@ is equivalent to sAfooAbarA is equivalent to s1foo1bar1. keep in mind, that our sed might not be totally compatible with GNU sed. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 11:33:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA74E16A481 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B40F13C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au (c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au [210.49.253.163]) by mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5FBXF5T016382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:33:16 +1000 From: Gemma Fletcher Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:33:27 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706152133.27118.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> Subject: KDE 3.5 Crashing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:33:18 -0000 Edit: Resending as having problems with my mail. If it pops up twice then apologies :) Hi list :) Installed BSD 6.2 a few days ago and am totally new to it all. I installed KDE 3.5 and it was working nicely until it just....stopped. No obvious crash - it just froze. Had to reboot the system with the reset button as no other method was working. So I thought it might be my sound and I had read a few things that said that sometimes caused KDE to crash. Also disabled a few buggy plugins and what not and still it keeps on freezing on me. The annoying thing is its totally random - It could be running for several hours before it freezes; and sometimes it freezes the moment I log on. Its frozen at last count 7 times today and I ended up having to do a some random hardrive check as boot up was starting to fail and logging me in as single mode user only. Anyway - to get to the point; is there a log somewhere that I can check out in console mode that might help me pinpoint the problem? Thanks in advance, Gemma From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 11:41:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD24316A477 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5043113C4C3 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:41:07 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5FBfAmh076476; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:41:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from m.apitz@oclcpica.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to m.apitz@oclcpica.org using -f Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:41:10 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Gemma Fletcher Message-ID: <20070615114110.GA76255@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <200706152133.27118.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200706152133.27118.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2007 11:41:07.0600 (UTC) FILETIME=[10171900:01C7AF42] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE 3.5 Crashing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:41:14 -0000 El día Friday, June 15, 2007 a las 09:33:27PM +1000, Gemma Fletcher escribió: > Edit: Resending as having problems with my mail. If it pops up twice then > apologies :) > > Hi list :) > > Installed BSD 6.2 a few days ago and am totally new to it all. I installed > KDE 3.5 and it was working nicely until it just....stopped. > > No obvious crash - it just froze. Had to reboot the system with the reset > button as no other method was working. > > So I thought it might be my sound and I had read > a few things that said that sometimes caused KDE to crash. Also disabled a > few buggy plugins and what not and still it keeps on freezing on me. > > The annoying thing is its totally random - It could be running for several > hours before it freezes; and sometimes it freezes the moment I log on. Its > frozen at last count 7 times today and I ended up having to do a some random > hardrive check as boot up was starting to fail and logging me in as single > mode user only. > > Anyway - to get to the point; is there a log somewhere that I can check out in > console mode that might help me pinpoint the > problem? Can you check if only X or KDE is frozen, or the system at all? Try to connect from some other host on the network. Try to do some RAM testing as well. matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://guru.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ OCLC PICA GmbH, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christine Magin-Weeger, Norbert Weinberger Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhaching, HRB Muenchen: 113261 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 12:23:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E994C16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64F8713C43E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oregnier@oregnier.net) Received: (qmail 21097 invoked by uid 503); 15 Jun 2007 12:23:55 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 15 Jun 2007 12:23:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail183.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 12:23:55 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 12:23:32 -0000 Received: from mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (postmaster@oregnier.net@82.241.6.173) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 12:23:32 -0000 Message-ID: <467284F9.7090005@oregnier.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:24:25 +0200 From: Olivier Regnier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikos Vassiliadis References: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> <200706151404.47348.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200706151404.47348.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.241.6.173 (mac76-2-82-241-6-173.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/N Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with sed command and csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:23:37 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis a écrit : > On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Olivier Regnier wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> Actually, i'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and csh shell. With a sh script, i >> trying to execute this command : >> sed -e "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => >> 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf >> >> The result is not correct, i have an error : >> sed: 1: "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/M . . .": bad flag in subsitute command: >> 'n' >> >> Can you help me please ? >> > > s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => > This n is invalid--------------------------^^^ > > You should add a backslash before each slash > that is not used as a separator for the s command. > E.g. > s/I want to substitute the \/ character/with the _ character/ > s/\/\/\//three slashes/ > > You can also use a separator of choice for the s command. > That is: > s/foo/bar/ is equivalent to s@foo@bar@ > is equivalent to sAfooAbarA > is equivalent to s1foo1bar1. > > keep in mind, that our sed might not be > totally compatible with GNU sed. > > HTH, Nikos > Thank for you anserw but the result is bad again :) I tryed this : sed "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail\/nbsmtp' => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf but i have this with cat /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf MAKE_ARGS = {nt'mail/nbsmtp' => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1', } Sed and csh is strange no ? I think \n \t not supported by csh. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 12:47:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CD916A485 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8314713C447 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7553F1C918A; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:47:21 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: Olivier Regnier Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:46:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> <200706151404.47348.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <467284F9.7090005@oregnier.net> In-Reply-To: <467284F9.7090005@oregnier.net> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706151546.55080.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with sed command and csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:47:22 -0000 On Friday 15 June 2007 15:24, Olivier Regnier wrote: > Nikos Vassiliadis a écrit : > > On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Olivier Regnier wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> Actually, i'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and csh shell. With a sh script, > >> i trying to execute this command : > >> sed -e "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => > >> 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > >> > >> The result is not correct, i have an error : > >> sed: 1: "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/M . . .": bad flag in subsitute > >> command: 'n' > >> > >> Can you help me please ? > > > > s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => > > This n is invalid--------------------------^^^ > > > > You should add a backslash before each slash > > that is not used as a separator for the s command. > > E.g. > > s/I want to substitute the \/ character/with the _ character/ > > s/\/\/\//three slashes/ > > > > You can also use a separator of choice for the s command. > > That is: > > s/foo/bar/ is equivalent to s@foo@bar@ > > is equivalent to sAfooAbarA > > is equivalent to s1foo1bar1. > > > > keep in mind, that our sed might not be > > totally compatible with GNU sed. > > > > HTH, Nikos > > Thank for you anserw but the result is bad again :) > I tryed this : sed "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail\/nbsmtp' > => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > but i have this with cat /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > > MAKE_ARGS = {nt'mail/nbsmtp' => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1', > } > > Sed and csh is strange no ? I think \n \t not supported by csh. No, its sed. You cannot use backslash notation with BSD sed. nik:0:~$ sed "s/foo/\t\n/" foo tn You can use a literal tab character, but not a literal newline character... How about this? nik:0:~$ echo foo | awk '{ sub(/foo/, "foo\n\tbar"); print; }' foo bar HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 13:35:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BC116A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6CD13C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D03456C6; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:28:22 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at esfm.ipn.mx Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7MmoxUmHZgo4; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:28:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AEF45602; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:28:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 189.142.9.240 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mrspock) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:28:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1073.189.142.9.240.1181914096.squirrel@mail.esfm.ipn.mx> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0706141121u1997a58bodb81c1e3cd617588@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070613203225.A10064@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> <46713E55.4050403@cs.okstate.edu> <1d3ed48c0706140932m6870e41fsb13bf052de07efd4@mail.gmail.com> <46716F58.3060800@cs.okstate.edu> <1d3ed48c0706141121u1997a58bodb81c1e3cd617588@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:28:16 -0500 (CDT) From: mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx To: "Kevin Downey" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: beryl/agpgart/i810/Intel 950 GMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:35:42 -0000 Thank you, guys. My system has been updated to 6.2-STABLE and now I can see my /dev/agpgart perfectly. I think it is important to notice that 6.2-RELEASE does not handle my video card: 950 GMA. Thank you Reid, thanks list. Eduardo. > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: >> Written by Kevin Downey on 06/14/07 11:32>> >> > On 6/14/07, Reid Linnemann wrote: >> >> Written by Eduardo Viruena Silva on 06/13/07 21:07>> >> >> > >> >> > Hello Guys, >> >> > >> >> > I have an Intel 950 GMA video card, >> >> > built-in in my computer's motherboard. >> >> > My motherboard is D945NT. >> >> > >> >> > I installed FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE, and cvsupdated >> >> > it to FreeBSD-6.2-RELEASE-p5. >> >> > >> >> > Installed my ports and cvsupdated them. >> >> > >> >> > I found "beryl" in /usr/ports/x11-wm, it >> >> > seemed to depend on Xorg-7.2 >> >> > >> >> > I successfully upgrade Xorg-6.9 to Xorg-7.2. >> >> > I also compiled beryl, everything seems to be ok. >> >> > >> >> > ..and I have tried to make it work, I give up. >> >> > >> >> > The problem seems to be that X is >> >> > trying to find /dev/agpgart, according >> >> > to my /var/log/Xorg.0.log: >> >> > >> >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation >> >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r) 82945G Chipset Family >> >> > Graphics Controller >> >> > (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 >> >> > (II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945G >> >> > (--) I810(0): Chipset: "945G" >> >> > (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x40000000 >> >> > (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x50100000 >> >> > (==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0x50100000,0x80000) was >> already >> >> clear >> >> > (II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available. >> >> > (II) I810(0): detected 7932 kB stolen memory. >> >> > (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or >> directory) >> >> > (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is >> >> > available >> >> > for allocation. Using pre-allocated memory only. >> >> > (--) I810(0): Pre-allocated VideoRAM: 7932 kByte >> >> > >> >> > I have seen beryl working on Gentoo Linux, >> >> > /dev/agpgart is present in an identical system, >> >> > and it seems to me that it is not a problem >> >> > of memory allocation. >> >> > >> >> > so... >> >> > >> >> > What do I have to do to create /dev/agpgart? >> >> > >> >> > My kernel has >> >> > >> >> > device agp >> >> > >> >> > present. >> >> > >> >> > Thank you in advance. >> >> > >> >> > Eduardo. >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> It looks to me like you don't have working dri/drm. You have to have >> >> direct rendering working before you can get beryl working. AFAIK, drm >> >> support for your chipset is not available in 6.1-RELEASE, and the drm >> >> module is what provides the agpgart device. >> >> >> >> sys/dev/drm/drm_pciids.h on 6-STABLE from about February shows this: >> >> >> >> #define i915_PCI_IDS \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x3577, 0, "Intel i830M GMCH"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x2562, 0, "Intel i845G GMCH"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x3582, 0, "Intel i852GM/i855GM GMCH"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x2572, 0, "Intel i865G GMCH"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x2582, 0, "Intel i915G"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x2592, 0, "Intel i915GM"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x2772, 0, "Intel i945G"}, \ >> >> {0x8086, 0x27A2, 0, "Intel i945GM"}, \ >> >> {0, 0, 0, NULL} >> >> >> >> So you have to have the i915 module loaded to use this chipset. >> Though >> >> the i915 driver was ported for 6.1-RELEASE there was no Makefile >> >> included, and it never really worked until after 6.2-RELEASE. >> >> Personally, I'm tracking 6-STABLE and I've had drm working with an >> i845G >> >> since February of this year when anholt MFC'd a load of i915 drm >> >> changes. See this log for more info: >> > >> > http://anholt.livejournal.com/34566.html >> > in an email on may 19th anholt indicated that there is no working >> > support for the 965G >> > >> >> Thanks for the link to anholt's journal. This doesn't affect the 945G, >> though, right? >> > > Truth is best determined by examination of reality. If your 945G is > working then I would say it is unaffected. > > -- > i'll unhook my oily pink mini-kimono, you kill him in honolulu -- > www.thelastcitadel.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 13:58:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4FB16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D01713C465 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.141] (may be forged)) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l5FDwDUE022585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:58:14 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.45] (c-24-10-12-194.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.10.12.194]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l5FDwDJi032648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:58:13 -0700 Message-ID: <46729AF6.7060504@u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:58:14 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <467269EE.6090001@oregnier.net> <200706151404.47348.nvass@teledomenet.gr> <467284F9.7090005@oregnier.net> <200706151546.55080.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200706151546.55080.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.15.63633 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Cc: Subject: Re: problem with sed command and csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:58:14 -0000 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2007 15:24, Olivier Regnier wrote: > >> Nikos Vassiliadis a écrit : >> >>> On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Olivier Regnier wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> Actually, i'm working on FreeBSD 6.2 and csh shell. With a sh script, >>>> i trying to execute this command : >>>> sed -e "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => >>>> 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf >>>> >>>> The result is not correct, i have an error : >>>> sed: 1: "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/M . . .": bad flag in subsitute >>>> command: 'n' >>>> >>>> Can you help me please ? >>>> >>> s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail/nbsmtp' => >>> This n is invalid--------------------------^^^ >>> >>> You should add a backslash before each slash >>> that is not used as a separator for the s command. >>> E.g. >>> s/I want to substitute the \/ character/with the _ character/ >>> s/\/\/\//three slashes/ >>> >>> You can also use a separator of choice for the s command. >>> That is: >>> s/foo/bar/ is equivalent to s@foo@bar@ >>> is equivalent to sAfooAbarA >>> is equivalent to s1foo1bar1. >>> >>> keep in mind, that our sed might not be >>> totally compatible with GNU sed. >>> >>> HTH, Nikos >>> >> Thank for you anserw but the result is bad again :) >> I tryed this : sed "s/MAKE_ARGS\([^{]*\){/MAKE_ARGS\1{\n\t'mail\/nbsmtp' >> => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1',/" > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf >> but i have this with cat /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf >> >> MAKE_ARGS = {nt'mail/nbsmtp' => 'WITH_IPV6=1 WITH_SSL=1', >> } >> >> Sed and csh is strange no ? I think \n \t not supported by csh. >> > > No, its sed. You cannot use backslash notation with > BSD sed. > nik:0:~$ sed "s/foo/\t\n/" > foo > tn > > You can use a literal tab character, but not a literal > newline character... > > How about this? > nik:0:~$ echo foo | awk '{ sub(/foo/, "foo\n\tbar"); print; }' > foo > bar > > HTH, Nikos > Note: Using (t)csh as a part of any text manipulation operation I've discovered is generally a bad idea. When using sed, perl, or (g)awk, I always use (ba)sh, because (t)csh does some nasty evaluation of inline expressions, whereas (ba)sh doesn't. Just try using an expression with an exclamation point, for example :). Also for most strings, I'd get in the habit of quoting with single quotes instead of double quotes, if at all possible, because sometimes shells and other programs evaluate double quoted arguments differently than single quoted arguments. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:44:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2BA16A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98AF13C455 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so831786nzn for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QIDY0PB6X0mcqkWiihDvOeord0WpBQrQhvCbbzBhZRgYX9WJXErW2Twl03SMaRht2yVoSVoYBwormNfeFFlg0kiwuoRnD9/ROuW0xsEAh2hvDVnX95uPYc+fCiDmvRsEN2j7pDbCazMUMMafkJPGnjtFJULJevoBeaNU13xeLrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Iao3QU0OGpgD9WQBwbWDEDm7JZjRTjtANohJ993JJRkTW9ZX2f1Vd+87i7ye3lpNnex/OWlfMtSg5DoTwSqpZ9TCA6oJefdIeUlXhupm1xx5nv1DDR5T8/b2jOE63GSIKF7SXCpefqnuOIGbZuqId8MGZGDw75NiZeObRWJjGoQ= Received: by 10.114.196.1 with SMTP id t1mr3065925waf.1181917080925; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.26.7 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8efc42630706150718j461af678y54f6b0812c4bdb5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:18:00 -0400 From: "Simon Chang" To: "John Hoskins" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Diary -- Is your ISP blocking port 25? Here's a Postfix solution. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:44:23 -0000 Um, since you had pulled this article from The FreeBSD Diary, why don't you try... www.freebsddiary.org? SC On 6/11/07, John Hoskins wrote: > I need to get ion touch with the person who posted the article: > I have a serious problem, and I need help. > > The FreeBSD Diary > > (TM) > Providing practical examples since 1998 > > [ HOME | TOPICS | INDEX | WEB RESOURCES | BOOKS | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH > | FEEDBACK | FAQ | FORUMS ] > > Is your ISP blocking port 25? Here's a Postfix solution.10 February 2006 > Need more help on this topic? Click here > This article has 7 comments > Show me similar articles > > My ISP started blocking incoming port 25. It's already blocking > outgoing port 25 and I'm handling that. Now it's time to start > accepting incoming mail on the submission port, 587. They aren't > blocking my incoming port 25. But we went through this process for > another guy on our computer, so I figured that this is a good thing > for which it will pay to be pro active. > > This solution assumes you have a mail server at home and at least one > other mail server out there on the Internet, one which does not have > port 25 blocked. That part is crucial to this solution. It is the > external server[s] that will accept incoming mail and forward it to > you. In DNS terms, your MX records will not point to your home > server, but to your public server. > > Your home mail server > I started by adding the following line to /usr/local/etc/postfix/ > master.cf on my Postfix mail server at home: > > 10.34.0.1:587 inet n - n - - smtpd > where 10.34.0.1 is the public IP address of my mail server [no, > that's not really my IP address]. This instructs Postfix to listen on > that IP address on port 587. This is known as the submission port: > $ grep 587 /etc/services > submission 587/tcp > submission 587/udp > Your public mail server > Then I added this to /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf on my public mail > server: > > transport_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix-config/transport > This tells Postfix to observe the transport directives in the above > mentioned file. You can put the file whereever you want. I like to > keep it in that directory, which you'll probably have to create > because it's not part of the standard system. In /usr/local/etc/ > postfix-config/transport I have: > > myserver.example.org smtp:[myserver.example.org]:587 > Where myserver.example.org is the hostname of my mail server at home. > You need to create a .db file to go with that. I issued these commands: > > cd /usr/local/etc/postfix-config > postmap transport > You should now see a transport.db file. After making these changes > you should restart postfix: > > postix restart > Testing > Then I sent a test message from the public mail server > > $ echo 'test' | mail me@myserver.example.org > I confirmed that it was coming in on port 587 with this command on my > mail server at home: > > tcpdump -i fxp0 port 587 > Where fxp0 is the outside NIC on my firewall (the one with IP > 10.34.0.1) as shown above. > > Then, on the public mail server, I requeued all the messages, so > they'd use the right transport: > > postsuper -r ALL > It's magic! > > All the messages were delivered to the right spot. > > Controlling access > I control access to port 587 on my mail server. I have firewall rules > in place that allow connections only from my home server. I think > there are no security risks involved in keeping it open, but I see no > reason to give access where no access is required. > > What about the other way around? > If you need to handle outgoing port 25 to avoid ISP blocks, you can > always the same instructions, but in the reverse direction. It should > just work. > > > > > Like the website? Want to give back? Please visit my wish list! > > > > > Need more help on this topic? Click here > This article has 7 comments > Show me similar articles > [ HOME | TOPICS | INDEX | WEB RESOURCES | BOOKS | CONTRIBUTE | SEARCH > | FEEDBACK | FAQ | FORUMS ] > Servers and bandwidth provided by New York Internet and SuperNews > Valid HTML, CSS , and RSS. > Copyright (c) 1997-2007 DVL Software Ltd. > All rights reserved. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 14:50:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8361A16A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gigi_8439@yahoo.fr) Received: from smtp009.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp009.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E302213C468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gigi_8439@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 2979 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2007 14:24:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Content-Type:To:From:Subject:Date:X-Mailer; b=DEy/Vv77rpPqe1rtxiWa2VRzzFqpTpm8r1AYok1ziBDgWcg5EcVFuxzdMLO+n+WTOA67YVjXdY9palNerqPs4yxMcdtdMscZ7Ng3Z/znE/3QzDtGbQOZvOL//zBCbgGVLSnMM1OTxUDqLZWdy6dudgxgyFE5FGQVQcbKJ90SnzQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.2.1.1?) (gigi_8439@217.128.170.68 with plain) by smtp009.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 14:24:18 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .FLhGI0VM1kNyY10fBQW7Cf0zj3CNwoLDgsIAlcRZ7a7Mn7aIeUKlXun0.Q0SLqHlKnWiVoyvg-- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ghislain Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:25:04 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: BPF and buffering X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:50:59 -0000 Hi, I'd like to write a specific BPF filter in order to read all packets ( before routing them ) on a network interface and buffering them in order to process them and after routing them if I decide that they are correct. But I don't know how to intercept them ( then they are not processed immediatly by the kernel ) in order to buffering them before giving them back to the kernel. Can you show me example, tutorials or documentation. Thanks Ghislain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:09:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D6A16A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59813C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.215]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJO0095NNFZK180@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:09:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.148]) by pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJO00BR8NFWS1W0@pd4mr4so.prod.shaw.ca> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:09:33 -0600 (MDT) Received: from s01060014bf5ee711.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.5.93]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJO00N7DNFX0Z30@l-daemon> for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:09:33 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:13:52 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy To: FreeBSD-questions Message-id: <200706142213.52658.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Subject: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:35 -0000 Hi everybody, Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for my 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. Thank you in advance! Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:23:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD7516A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rj45@slacknet.com) Received: from slacknet.com (slacknet.com [166.70.153.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590A513C448 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rj45@slacknet.com) Received: from rj45 (helo=localhost) by slacknet.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HzDHc-00081h-Ee for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:16 -0600 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:16 -0600 (MDT) From: RJ45 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rj45@slacknet.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on slacknet.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: problems with freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:23:34 -0000 hello I have 2 servers with FreeBSD 6.2 rebuilt from sources. when I use freebsd-update it fetchs updates and install them. AFter rebooting I always have the old kernel booting. what's wrong ? thanks Rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:24:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D6D16A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apache@www1.quechup.com) Received: from www1.quechup.com (mail2.quechup.com [212.100.231.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0831113C4BB for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apache@www1.quechup.com) Received: by www1.quechup.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 19B4B2B0875; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:58:14 +0100 (BST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Sergey Lapin" Sender: "Quechup" X-Mailer: PHP v4.3.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20070615145814.19B4B2B0875@www1.quechup.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:58:14 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Invite from Sergey Lapin (slapinid@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Lapin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:24:12 -0000 Join Sergey on Quechup You have been invited to join SergeyLapin's friends network http://quechup.com/ - REGISTER NOW FOR FREE and find out why everyone's joining As a member of Quechup you can... - Start a blog and share your thoughts with private groups, friends or the world - Get in touch with old friends. - Meet new people in your area, or anywhere else in the world. - Online instant messenger with full video and audio support. - Socialize with 'friends-of-friends' and mutual acquaintances. - Increase your social circle ... and so much more! Become part of Sergey's Quechup.com friends. New & Coming Soon on Quechup -------------------------------- - Games - play Solitaire, Mahjong, Dice, Bubble Up and more online - Blogs - let people know what you're up to - Video Posts - use your webcam to record video clips on Quechup - Member Comments - on photos and blogs ------------------------------------------------------------------ You received this because Sergey Lapin (slapinid@gmail.com) knows and agreed to invite you. You will only receive one invitation from slapinid@gmail.com. Quechup will not spam or sell your email address, see our privacy policy - http://quechup.com/privacy.php Go to http://quechup.com/emailunsubscribe.php/ZW09ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc%3D if you do not wish to receive any more emails from Quechup. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail was sent on behalf of SergeyCopyright Quechup.com 2007. Quechup.com is owned by iDate Ltd From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:35:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577A716A474 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AF313C4C9 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1679253pyi for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:35:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VEG1jcVfXx3rKDvmzVoiZ+O6dzv3mBfx5ta1Kj54pmrQuOJos7Y8AOPKtA+6RFQhOq7ElJjN/b7gpLILN97ArlOWuF1t6yLgV+1LHGJgY1sqzUFC4bxv2bO8ifqIcg5Xj+Hy45Wee0tuiUggv9JmEfkcxjQYciLqd02bo0O7yUw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=iQ4m6Kk9kTka6rXNAPGvsnsZQzviv0RfvDFbT8g9WDPsmMgaAKpZajdveb0Qss6uo2d6u1A5IoeY6dulGEgMxkZGIeJQsWGQTduem7XD1kyO7WDWenZwSLLZoMSfAcbAXplJgvWYRQxnu2L7BQfCJp0mfpdaMfoIb3Vpsp2oHJw= Received: by 10.35.126.2 with SMTP id d2mr5387632pyn.1181921746715; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:35:46 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Upgrading x.org to 7.2 (to make other ports happy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:35:49 -0000 Hi, Ok, last night I sit down to continue installing software on that web server I mentioned a couple of days ago. By the way, the culprit was definitely heat. Last night, I successfully recompiled the GENERIC kernel for 6.2p5 without a hitch, and the day before I successfully completed the "buildworld". Continuing on, after getting the system caught up, I updated my ports tree using csup and proceeded to portupgrade all installed ports (only about 5 at this time). However, X.org is among them. So, the portupgrade program is doing its thing I figure since it took a little over an hour to compile all of X before, I was going to do other things and so left the box to its own devices. I come back a little later to find that I've got to update X.org according /usr/ports/UPDATING. I open this file and read up on what it says. In there it says I need to run a script called "xorg-upgrade" however, this script does not exist on this box. I just finished a search on www.x.org for "xorg-upgrade" with no results. So, where am I supposed to get this script? The UPDATING file doesn't mention that. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:42:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EA016A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C1113C48C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010CB45555; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:35:33 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at esfm.ipn.mx Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dCrXB9d02PmG; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:35:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81D014547F; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:35:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8054245421; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:35:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:35:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: RJ45 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070615103459.T63544@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:42:53 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, RJ45 wrote: > > > hello > I have 2 servers with FreeBSD 6.2 rebuilt from sources. > > when I use freebsd-update it fetchs updates and install them. > AFter rebooting I always have the old kernel booting. > > what's wrong ? > > thanks > > > Rick Did you compile your kernel? Building the world from the sources does not modify your kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:44:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FACE16A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-5.eunet.yu (smtpclu-5.eunet.yu [194.247.192.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5CC13C4BC for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-220-201.eunet.yu [213.198.220.201]) by smtpclu-5.eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5FFippP020583; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:44:52 +0200 Message-Id: <200706151544.l5FFippP020583@smtpclu-5.eunet.yu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:44:59 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: "chatlove" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_50,TW_XF,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 0.1 Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:44:58 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:49 +0300 "chatlove" wrote: > Hi everybody, >=20 > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent > they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is > highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for > my 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. >=20 > Thank you in advance! Hello Andriy, The Xfce Project offers a list of recommended applications in all categories: http://wiki.xfce.org/recommendedapps My personal recommendation for mail app: Claws Mail, very small, rich in plugins and options, and fast, fast, fast. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:45:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FD516A475 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail06.ifxnetworks.com (mail06.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E9B13C4D0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 4528 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2007 15:45:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ifxnw.cl) ([190.61.128.23]) (envelope-sender ) by mail06.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Jun 2007 15:45:09 -0000 Received: from 64.117.137.69 (proxying for 161.131.179.195, 161.131.179.195) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmw@unete.cl) by webmail.ifxnw.cl with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:45:09 -0400 (CLT) Message-ID: <36416.64.117.137.69.1181922309.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> In-Reply-To: <200706142213.52658.ABabiy@shaw.ca> References: <200706142213.52658.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:45:09 -0400 (CLT) From: "Daniel Molina Wegener" To: "Andriy Babiy" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:45:10 -0000 El Vie, 15 de Junio de 2007, 1:13, Andriy Babiy escribió: > Hi everybody, > > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent they use > with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is highly desirable. > I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for my 8 years old son. > Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. Try Sylpheed. It's in the ports collection. > > Thank you in advance! > > Andriy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Regards, -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer ..O | dmw [at] unete [dot] cl | FOSS Coding Adict OOO | BSD & Linux User | Standards Rocks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:50:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487F916A46B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from mail02.ifxnetworks.com (mail02.ifxnetworks.com [190.61.128.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910113C4AD for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 25173 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2007 15:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ifxnw.cl) ([190.61.128.23]) (envelope-sender ) by mail02.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Jun 2007 15:50:07 -0000 Received: from 64.117.137.69 (proxying for 161.131.179.195, 161.131.179.195) (SquirrelMail authenticated user dmw@unete.cl) by webmail.ifxnw.cl with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:50:07 -0400 (CLT) Message-ID: <59837.64.117.137.69.1181922607.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> References: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:50:07 -0400 (CLT) From: "Daniel Molina Wegener" To: "Andrew Falanga" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Upgrading x.org to 7.2 (to make other ports happy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dmw@unete.cl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:09 -0000 El Vie, 15 de Junio de 2007, 11:35, Andrew Falanga escribió: > Hi, > > Ok, last night I sit down to continue installing software on that web > server I mentioned a couple of days ago. By the way, the culprit was > definitely heat. Last night, I successfully recompiled the GENERIC > kernel for 6.2p5 without a hitch, and the day before I successfully > completed the "buildworld". Continuing on, after getting the system > caught up, I updated my ports tree using csup and proceeded to > portupgrade all installed ports (only about 5 at this time). However, > X.org is among them. > > So, the portupgrade program is doing its thing I figure since it took > a little over an hour to compile all of X before, I was going to do > other things and so left the box to its own devices. I come back a > little later to find that I've got to update X.org according > /usr/ports/UPDATING. I open this file and read up on what it says. > In there it says I need to run a script called "xorg-upgrade" however, > this script does not exist on this box. I just finished a search on > www.x.org for "xorg-upgrade" with no results. So, where am I supposed > to get this script? The UPDATING file doesn't mention that. You must set the XORG_UPGRADE environment variable to YES, and the script is made through the command line in the UPGRADE file using the script(1) utility. If you want a 100% secure X.Org upgrading, try 'portupgrade -vfarR', but this recompiles all your installed ports... use -P instead of -f if you want to install binary packages. > > Andy > [SNIP] > Regards, -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer ..O | dmw [at] unete [dot] cl | FOSS Coding Adict OOO | BSD & Linux User | Standards Rocks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:54:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A1A16A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net (galaxy.systems.pipex.net [62.241.162.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB7E13C4C6 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.10.181]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58949E000A1E; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:54:08 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4672B61F.2080603@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:54:07 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Upgrading x.org to 7.2 (to make other ports happy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:10 -0000 Andrew Falanga wrote: > I come back a > little later to find that I've got to update X.org according > /usr/ports/UPDATING. I open this file and read up on what it says. > In there it says I need to run a script called "xorg-upgrade" however, > this script does not exist on this box. Please read the instructions more carefully. You are supposed to run a program called "script" with the parameter "xorg-upgrade". script is a program which will create a file called xorg-upgrade. All the commands you subsequently type and all the output you get will be logged in the file xorg-upgrade, so that if something goes wrong you have a log of the errors to refer to, cut-and-pate from etc. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:54:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB39E16A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from raptor.centroin.com (asmtp.centroin.com [64.251.27.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716BB13C4E7 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by raptor.centroin.com (8.14.1/8.13.6/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id l5FFsxpM087365 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:55:01 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:54:58 -0300 (BRT) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070615124550.D81051@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Problem after upgrade, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:54:40 -0000 Hi all, I'm in trouble here. I did an upgrade via Boot CD, from FBSD 5.4 to 6.1 that finished without errors. But after the reboot, I discovered that the disk partition has gone. The original disk had two partitions, one DOS (20GB) and the other FBSD (60 GB), selectable via FBSD boot manager. Since I don't have a backup of the original disk labels, how can I recover my partitions? Thank you, - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:06:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0088D16A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BB713C43E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1696398pyi for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:06:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F/NU0QA7Wy83JMYh0elYR2hNWSmYJreS/x0yl6DFz4WpkJ4RprW3Zeb9u2Jj8pRFlfyNAyxifrRcqzNUk4xuFuCLRumtz0H0mNPy/An9VuapMyWVTrL7AinvahdckIbgeSyTVwMAzwbHzRyLxBJ8Idzvr8x8C+4al1oCGbMNUNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jqlarW/czgk2yby1Ajfz/raCOZZwlA4Y5EjNH/aFDjn3wvJyPRTVs6b0uq6gHVUBMoE9O3kw02nSkfbdYZehPC/PzMBg6kxeM1K+7+xXcTqQRQe2e9Mg/JjhMgNVygZuCuNQEhUyh4egZ0v+AN+HbSa/vw3YjM3T4LiTNZohS2o= Received: by 10.35.52.18 with SMTP id e18mr5438303pyk.1181923579129; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.36.15 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540706150906h7a2348b4m8a11148f4bd31bd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:06:14 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" In-Reply-To: <4672B61F.2080603@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540706150835k27bc59f0wdfc326a08958410e@mail.gmail.com> <4672B61F.2080603@dial.pipex.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Upgrading x.org to 7.2 (to make other ports happy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:20 -0000 On 6/15/07, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > I come back a > > little later to find that I've got to update X.org according > > /usr/ports/UPDATING. I open this file and read up on what it says. > > In there it says I need to run a script called "xorg-upgrade" however, > > this script does not exist on this box. > > Please read the instructions more carefully. You are supposed to run a > program called "script" with the parameter "xorg-upgrade". script is a > program which will create a file called xorg-upgrade. All the commands > you subsequently type and all the output you get will be logged in the > file xorg-upgrade, so that if something goes wrong you have a log of the > errors to refer to, cut-and-pate from etc. > I did read through that part, but I made a bad assumption. I was assuming that the script xorg-upgrade was something separate because other instructions in there said to be sure to use a filesystem with lots of space. I was thinking that the script program was some sort of program that would capture the output of the program so that "developers could see it" or something like that. Bogus assumption because I'm not at all familiar with script. Thanks for setting me straight. Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:06:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659FB16A473 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A7B13C4C1 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B451981 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:06:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:06:40 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070615170640.1ea15927@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pf(4) + fetch(1) + http://ftp.gnu.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:06:45 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:36:40 +0300 "Vlad GURDIGA" wrote: > Hello, > > There is one strange thing going on with this combination. I saw this > many times by now: when fetch(1) is trying to download something from > http://ftp.gnu.org, it is hanging after a very small amount of data; > sometimes on 0%. After disabling pf(4), fetch(1) is not hanging any > more, so I guess that the problem is somewhere in my pf.conf. Here is > ... > pass in inet proto icmp all icmp-type $icmp_types keep state > pass out on $ext_if proto tcp all modulate state flags S/SA Try replacing modulate with keep. I had a similar problem and that fixed it for me. I don't think that modulate gives you any benefit unless you have very old, unpatched OS's behind the firewall. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:08:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F4E16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15C613C4C3 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05FDF8B1; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:05:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:10:08 +0200 From: cpghost To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20070615161008.GA10793@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20070614220415.GA92111@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <4671CBBD.2020001@queue.to> <1181865442.35746.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1181865442.35746.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: Howard Goldstein , cpghost , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gimp-2.2.15,2 crashes after gtk-2.10.13 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:08:42 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:57:22PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:14 -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote: > > cpghost wrote: > > > Can anyone else confirm this bug, perhaps with other Gtk2 apps? > > > > Confirmed. Here's what I got > > > > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ gimp > > The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error. > > This probably reflects a bug in the program. > > The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. > > (Details: serial 29407 error_code 3 request_code 39 minor_code 0) > > (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; > > that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. > > To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line > > option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful > > backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() > > function.) > > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ > > (script-fu:4359): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: script-fu: wire_read(): error > > > > cally:/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2$ > > See the freebsd-x11@ archives. There is a bug in libX11 that is causing > this. A patch can be found in the bug to fix this problem. Ah, yes! Thank you. It was indeed not the gtk, but the libX11 upgrade that broke gimp here (didn't use a few days, so I didn't notice). Sorry for the confusion and thanks for the patch! :) > Joe Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:51:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0541316A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842F213C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.2.126]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id l5FGpUYT008106 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:30 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:31 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:38 -0000 Hi all Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3 for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / & /usr and lets use ZFS for /home Regards. -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Heure local/Local time: Ven 15 jui 2007 18:49:50 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:56:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7DA16A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chatlove@ukr.net) Received: from ffe2.ukr.net (ffe2.ukr.net [195.214.192.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB3B13C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chatlove@ukr.net) Received: from mail by ffe2.ukr.net with local ID 1HzF5b-00047W-B8 ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:55:59 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikola Lecic From: "chatlove" X-Life: is great, enjoy it! X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net mPOP 3.3 X-Originating-Ip: [207.232.108.188] In-Reply-To: <200706151544.l5FFippP020583@smtpclu-5.eunet.yu> X-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:55:59 +0300 Cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re[2]: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:56:01 -0000 > > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent > > they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is > > highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for > > my 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. > > > > Thank you in advance! > > Hello Andriy, > > The Xfce Project offers a list of recommended applications in all > categories: > > http://wiki.xfce.org/recommendedapps > > My personal recommendation for mail app: Claws Mail, very small, rich in > plugins and options, and fast, fast, fast. > > Nikola Le?i? Nikola, Thank you. That's the page I was looking for. Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:02:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 80AE916A46B; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070615170200.80AE916A46B@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:02:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 879ED16A46D; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070615170200.879ED16A46D@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:02:00 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:43:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C88916A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CB413C458 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E1391DB27; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 0688B40103; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:18 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-a2b3cbb000002ff2-34-4672cfb5651b Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 8439F4004E; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070615124550.D81051@trex.centroin.com.br> References: <20070615124550.D81051@trex.centroin.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5B52F5F5-5F41-49CD-B3FD-B54C2AECCF8A@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:16 -0700 To: scuba@centroin.com.br X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem after upgrade, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:43:18 -0000 On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:54 AM, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: > I did an upgrade via Boot CD, from FBSD 5.4 to 6.1 that finished > without errors. But after the reboot, I discovered that the disk > partition has gone. > The original disk had two partitions, one DOS (20GB) and the other > FBSD (60 GB), selectable via FBSD boot manager. > Since I don't have a backup of the original disk labels, how can I > recover my partitions? You can try to use the fdisk program via the sysinstall program from your boot CD (ie Configure->Fdisk) and recreate your partitions, assuming you can remember or get lucky recreating the exact parameters. There's also: /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk Tool to check and undelete partition Works with the following partitions: - FAT12 FAT16 FAT32 - Linux EXT2/EXT3 - Linux SWAP (version 1 and 2) - NTFS (Windows NT/W2K/XP) - BeFS (BeOS) - UFS (BSD) - Netware - ReiserFS TestDisk is under GNU Public License. You can compile it under Dos with DJGPP or under Linux or BSD with gcc. WWW: http://www.cgsecurity.org/ - Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:47:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE07116A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from raptor.centroin.com (asmtp.centroin.com [64.251.27.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF5A13C484 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by raptor.centroin.com (8.14.1/8.13.6/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id l5FHloFQ007456; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:47:57 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:47:49 -0300 (BRT) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <5B52F5F5-5F41-49CD-B3FD-B54C2AECCF8A@mac.com> Message-ID: <20070615144621.H32002@trex.centroin.com.br> References: <20070615124550.D81051@trex.centroin.com.br> <5B52F5F5-5F41-49CD-B3FD-B54C2AECCF8A@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem after upgrade, please help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:47:37 -0000 Hi Chuck, On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: |On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:54 AM, scuba@centroin.com.br wrote: |> I did an upgrade via Boot CD, from FBSD 5.4 to 6.1 that finished |> without errors. But after the reboot, I discovered that the disk partition |> has gone. |> The original disk had two partitions, one DOS (20GB) and the other FBSD |> (60 GB), selectable via FBSD boot manager. |> Since I don't have a backup of the original disk labels, how can I |> recover my partitions? | |You can try to use the fdisk program via the sysinstall program from your boot |CD (ie Configure->Fdisk) and recreate your partitions, assuming you can |remember or get lucky recreating the exact parameters. There's also: I don't think I have that lock. :-) |/usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk I'll try testdisk, thank you. - Marcelo Souza |Tool to check and undelete partition |Works with the following partitions: |- FAT12 FAT16 FAT32 |- Linux EXT2/EXT3 |- Linux SWAP (version 1 and 2) |- NTFS (Windows NT/W2K/XP) |- BeFS (BeOS) |- UFS (BSD) |- Netware |- ReiserFS | |TestDisk is under GNU Public License. |You can compile it under Dos with DJGPP or under Linux or BSD with gcc. | |WWW: http://www.cgsecurity.org/ | |- Florent Thoumie |flz@xbsd.org | |-- |-Chuck - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 18:34:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828D516A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F38213C45B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A471A4D81; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B914B512C2; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 71B1BBE8F; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:34:13 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Albert Shih Message-ID: <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:34:14 -0000 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all >=20 > Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3 > for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / & /u= sr and lets > use ZFS for /home=20 ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. UFS2 does not have problems with creating filesystems >2TB so there is no need for a UFS3 on that account. Kris --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGctulWry0BWjoQKURAv3hAJ92PAkNUoJZHyuTS5tlWcKk/R1IswCfTUfq Z+1ctg3NHIvyNiQT1n8EDnQ= =3CEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:15:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F89116A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B92313C46E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so1288061waf for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cSUEkrKAKTuvkGUyJJjoa52wDIUjik9GDZDatoKruWenOvG+o/ZljeGKnqzBgGbI5/xUEfEKclS1oTWG4e68GcZTJ8Ge2yjvifULhRLwPZeXGeketeNMSh/GHVa8x++/jkmHhn29UZ3EZ3HXRBPoKbsNa2QRywO8VtzWRxh/jdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SMmV7gFrJ1zbvTYeCW6NDZmB63ormjhEo6HEa3Wmwnyy1F2PWWbAEqsjGoVtlIZMk9XRV17XLt5FISi+XGCV8kYP44hc9kCSFHOgwOiMoHdjVcJ7tlwlQhSyUYzDv+GmI+opAJ0fGsUdexZ2UcOL5nftDXPELDLCfu6oTT8LcYQ= Received: by 10.115.93.16 with SMTP id v16mr3293033wal.1181934912875; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:15:12 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:14 -0000 This is very strange - I can't get traceroute to work as I expect. Forgive me if I'm being stupid as well as blind, but perusing the man page for traceroute brings no joy. It simply doesn't produce expected results - I don't think I'm on the same network as www.freebsd.org, so where are the answers from all of the intervening hops? zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms Why is this so important? Well, I'm in a network segment with two routers, and I'm trying to determine that the machine is using the correct default gateway. uname -a yeilds: FreeBSD zsquid.mycompany.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Jun 1 16:03:26 PDT 2007 root@zsquid.zetron.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 /etc/rc.conf has these lines: defaultrouter="192.168.8.4" hostname="zsquid.mycompany.com" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.8.72 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig shows the following: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.8.72 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.8.255 ether 00:11:11:2b:db:97 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:25:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857B216A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D3F13C43E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saltmiser@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1798233pyi for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cpsi+YH+dJ2YUQYehkok3Zp3hT3Eg2stdRbc6wKFap1vIDPTV5Gq4ROVReCCjAkCHUpZTIGlMKcKQ9rHHiqKweGnN5YZr/u8mG3ObBOadsUQZLOncJZRXgXR25f7NaAJl6f+1alyiY8nwFQsQD55hhSLp7e9IHK0/gthyGrDkeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ToLwPkW/2iMYD+nOpPVU28aAnaVgSuD+CT/g1PC8ajxQbpk43lgxlwN3WRFUnpQZHADrul+fzKUcautK4etybKZStPAaq6hIT68iJbb81W/Ookn2kYh5RxhJBB4itSYYuzebJAEyq/r+4BqWgdvvjy2lplkBPqNSWsyTAgnLpXM= Received: by 10.64.183.6 with SMTP id g6mr5835612qbf.1181935512595; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.239.10 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:25:12 -0400 From: "Jim Capozzoli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:25:13 -0000 On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3 > > for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / & /usr and lets > > use ZFS for /home > > ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so > UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. > Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a tradition or something. ;) Why couldn't one make it so you have ZFS capability during a FreeBSD install, ZFS licensing isn't that bad is it? > UFS2 does not have problems with creating filesystems >2TB so there is > no need for a UFS3 on that account. > > Kris > > -- Jim Capozzoli D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:30:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B45216A46C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3512613C44C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com ([71.141.72.46]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:30:52 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:34:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill-Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20070615123103.W74361@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> System-ID: [en] (FreeBSD-6.2; i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Keyspan P/N= USA-19QW (not recognized?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:30:55 -0000 Hello Family, Just plugged in my "Keyspan" 19QW usb-2-serial adapter and not even the USB link light activated... Is this a kernel recompile issue in regards to activating some param? Gotta get into a console server right now and need to reboot my laptop to hurry and get in... Laptop is triple-booted... BRB -- Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com "Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing." -- Redd Foxx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:47:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB0316A47C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5998513C4C1 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5FJkw1X063042 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:46:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l5FJkw7d063039 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:46:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:46:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070615214538.L62079@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: linux-opera & java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:47:05 -0000 what should i install (preferably ports) to make java working in linux-opera? linux-flashplugin7, acroread & realplayer works in opera. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:49:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F9A16A556 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0D913C484 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5FJnFKc064129; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:49:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l5FJnEpG064126; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:49:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:49:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jim Capozzoli In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:49:18 -0000 >> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. >> > Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS > for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:51:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F3F16A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC1313C457 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5FJpoAO065978; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:51:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l5FJpoqa065968; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:51:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:51:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Kurt Buff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:51:53 -0000 > zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org > traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 19:52:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CA516A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (chylonia.3miasto.net [83.12.228.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600013C43E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5FJqHwD067889; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:52:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l5FJqHoM067885; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:52:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:52:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bill-Schoolcraft In-Reply-To: <20070615123103.W74361@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> Message-ID: <20070615215211.B63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070615123103.W74361@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keyspan P/N= USA-19QW (not recognized?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:52:20 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Bill-Schoolcraft wrote: > Hello Family, > > Just plugged in my "Keyspan" 19QW usb-2-serial adapter and not even > the USB link light activated... > nothing in dmesg? > Is this a kernel recompile issue in regards to activating some > param? > > Gotta get into a console server right now and need to reboot my > laptop to hurry and get in... > > Laptop is triple-booted... > > BRB > > -- > Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com > > "Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, > lying in hospitals dying of nothing." > -- Redd Foxx > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:09:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E96516A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk (scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk [62.84.188.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6F313C45A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@joeholden.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.230] (unknown [78.86.5.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scarlett.lon.rewt.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E053984C; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:10:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:09:20 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kurt Buff , FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:09:47 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte >> packets >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms > > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? -- Joe Holden T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 E: joe@joeholden.co.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:13:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3532F16A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from digitxserv@cyberserver.hu) Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7999213C44B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:13:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from digitxserv@cyberserver.hu) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (really [86.101.54.134]) by viefep34-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070615195656.PAOV21987.viefep34-int.chello.at@[192.168.2.100]> for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4672EF82.2070206@cyberserver.hu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:58:58 +0200 From: DiGiTX User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070512) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:13:52 -0000 hay :) I wanna freeBSD email adress. (digitx@freebsd.org) ok.. ? :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:14:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF9916A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9F413C457 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so914333nzn for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tUxmUMfxTpVd6BoibZASQEpuBnTMAetcoQS+pq6QUJDjYRgYs+H9boc0UtIvDGOCQrU0cT/YZikFqSwSvmSyo424TKLTZy4PlpxodkiExx4KKNRCB6sT7snspkmK7auOLXxETe7rCO8iwjlDBZG8nbOuQB42l/fttiwv0hl5Fno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=P1ob7rgrzDsz4z9Q+Gka6Gn+rfA4kwdy1fReWYeA6byb14LQYJYqBeIbfWyoO6BLFHNQNXoOGaqfL80Sip5pv4u9HVT/LtTe+Au+OR9j5mepr3DXh2UtS5gk495flpDENVmXK2+D0DbTDaQzQwTXBgCZ6qFY3cw/Dzj0XT7j5rw= Received: by 10.114.155.1 with SMTP id c1mr3381434wae.1181938454476; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:14:14 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Joe Holden" In-Reply-To: <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> Cc: Wojciech Puchar , FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:14:15 -0000 On 6/15/07, Joe Holden wrote: > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org > >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte > >> packets > >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms > > > > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as > > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... > Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? > -- > Joe Holden > T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 > E: joe@joeholden.co.uk Uh, don't know what those are, and I built this machine myself, from scratch, so I doubt it. All it's got on it is postfix (for mailing daily reports) and squid. It's pointed to our new T1, out a Watchguard firewall - we're going to use the old T1 for mail and traffic to our branch offices. Oh, and to reply to Wojciech, here's what he wanted as well: zsquid# ifconfig -a fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.8.72 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.8.255 ether 00:11:11:2b:db:97 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:16:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7840E16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD8B13C44B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5FKIK6f020775 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5FKG9og014837; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:16:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:16:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri\, 15 Jun 2007 21\:49\:14 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:16 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: >>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. >>> >> Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using >> ZFS for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a > > if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) > partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/ zfs _is_ nice but bear in mind it is still in development. There are issues. But overall it might become a very important FS. Even booting off zfs became available. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:32:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1B416A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEAF13C447 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A67C9F31BE; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:32:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id L5FlaORopFKn; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:32:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5063f539.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.245.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E394D9F31BC; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:32:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4672F756.3040402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:32:22 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DiGiTX References: <4672EF82.2070206@cyberserver.hu> In-Reply-To: <4672EF82.2070206@cyberserver.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:32:31 -0000 DiGiTX escribió: > hay :) > I wanna freeBSD email adress. (digitx@freebsd.org) > ok.. ? :) > > Hey! Our policy is that only official FreeBSD developers get a @FreeBSD.org address. Of course, you can get one as well, but you have to become a developer first. This does not mean that you have to be a hardcore kernel hacker, you can work on the ports collection or the documentation as well. Cheers, -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:39:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C7016A41F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from mail-in05.adhost.com (mail-in05.adhost.com [216.211.128.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD36313C4CC for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Received: from ad-exh01.adhost.lan (unknown [216.211.143.69]) by mail-in05.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41FF164849; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mksmith@adhost.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:40:04 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D520316022ABA05@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... Thread-Index: AcevjFLmgFuVWsrlTEuRVLqbCSyjOgAAOfaQ References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" To: "Kurt Buff" , "Joe Holden" Cc: Wojciech Puchar , FreeBSD Subject: RE: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:39:59 -0000 Hello: > On 6/15/07, Joe Holden wrote: > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > >> zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org > > >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte > > >> packets > > >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms > > > > > > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as > > > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... > > Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? > > -- > > Joe Holden > > T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 > > E: joe@joeholden.co.uk >=20 > Uh, don't know what those are, and I built this machine myself, from > scratch, so I doubt it. >=20 > All it's got on it is postfix (for mailing daily reports) and squid. > It's pointed to our new T1, out a Watchguard firewall - we're going to > use the old T1 for mail and traffic to our branch offices. >=20 Do you have a Proxy of some sort on your network that might have cached www.freebsd.org? Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:43:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18E816A585 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C8513C458 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5FKjMui020839 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5FKh9Sm014892; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:43:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:43:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri\, 15 Jun 2007 21\:49\:14 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:17 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: >>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. > > if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) > partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest. http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris I know it is a sun site. Don't intend to attack fbsd. But the topic is ZFS and that will become available in many systems, I'm sure! -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:45:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF9016A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C8D13C4BB for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b14so1209554qbc for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:45:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=p689mcAhw+9SFO1SY82w5PThrvtYF4ZBor72cYQ/6mDyeQ77mPs3ReykdVoyx12oJMf5uBL4IzvG/4vOEuEN/IzAcAnjt4ZygW7h5z+M+IUyYIiupV2aZQW4qpl6hoO680IaETA5gKhTFcfWdiZI4iPekzAryTnmBYgr8ivmBCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=A9bR9AnxCSlpV0OWC9CewF2mZVMTHeFlkImo+a9OsmBMe0nBAKTkf7UpoFv2wnfbNEQMyyC1Pwc0Z+yiuA0qQQJKMXvgWB5Q3UnMtjA7Nl8/ga5TQZP7kDdGXaFJMpCAbug1eMM8ppfBCwjtSNU/56Q2bwfM7QPZYsoFL7Nf02U= Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr3455560wad.1181940354480; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.194.13 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:45:54 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: DiGiTX In-Reply-To: <4672EF82.2070206@cyberserver.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4672EF82.2070206@cyberserver.hu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 29ff1d1677efd888 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:45:56 -0000 On 6/15/07, DiGiTX wrote: > hay :) > I wanna freeBSD email adress. (digitx@freebsd.org) > ok.. ? :) Members only, sorry :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:47:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22D016A46F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C204013C4C5 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com ([71.141.72.46]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:47:32 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:50:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill-Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20070615215211.B63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Message-ID: <20070615134734.L74791@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> References: <20070615123103.W74361@corten11-bsd.billschoolcraft.com> <20070615215211.B63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> System-ID: [en] (FreeBSD-6.2; i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keyspan P/N= USA-19QW (not recognized?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:47:36 -0000 At Fri, 15 Jun 2007 it looks like Wojciech Puchar composed: > > > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Bill-Schoolcraft wrote: > >> Hello Family, >> >> Just plugged in my "Keyspan" 19QW usb-2-serial adapter and not even >> the USB link light activated... >> > > nothing in dmesg? > Yes, actually "ugen0" but what worried me is that when I plug in this device, it always "lit-up" (lights come on) to indicate the device is getting a "link/power" light. I had to reboot my laptop into linux to get access, the "link/power" light came on immediately in both my Keyspan device and the the link light in the USB cable itself. It appears that the USB port did not even give "power" to the device, kind of felt like a lower level hardware issue if you get my drift... -- Bill Schoolcraft <*> http://wiliweld.com "Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing." -- Redd Foxx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:53:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E53916A46D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569A013C458 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD36921B37; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 371FE100BE; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807124-a019cbb000005458-fd-4672fc356bf9 Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 1F2ED10079; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:08 -0700 To: Kurt Buff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:53:09 -0000 On Jun 15, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte >> >> packets >> >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms >> > >> > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as >> > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... >> Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? >> -- >> Joe Holden >> T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 >> E: joe@joeholden.co.uk > > Uh, don't know what those are, and I built this machine myself, from > scratch, so I doubt it. > > All it's got on it is postfix (for mailing daily reports) and squid. > It's pointed to our new T1, out a Watchguard firewall - we're going to > use the old T1 for mail and traffic to our branch offices. It would not be astonishing if your Watchguard firewall was blocking or modifying the traceroute traffic and ICMP time exceeded packets which result, unless someone has explicitly configured it to pass traceroutes. However, the problem you've shown can also happen when something things it should proxy-arp for all IPs, in other words, it will claim that anything outside of the subnet it is actually on is really a local IP and should go to that particular MAC address. Doing an "arp -a" and looking for dups should indicate whether this sort of thing is happening... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:57:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2055F16A46C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF79713C45D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so924009nzn for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kKvdw10o4ZV+C7AHaoTryRW6OfnW2VJiwDGmIdYUxFPllzQX5bMnIT6/EK/RaCG94AfT/sIsDiKcX1mxk4MIQXTRUGsUGDRjl/jk8yu2gY/PfgiCKmErz4Hvg8uEduFmKkN0muRqt7U95kRPzcuBHr8kQfAroVe923SDgZWFrh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gepgwxnmmawCBjAFUJGhRxYpdVVdTEDsionh15C8Dr8qojmeJE2Vk7/94ym0uPXm1o9elJPeX8CtLmqBl3tEi0UBHaSJRL+V/sBtHRFiD3AkxFumt7fo2KT0imh54AcuNyY9wGJDdkKiW174CpIIfO2r6hmLfaGQZBVRZOJ0MYs= Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr3373574waa.1181941063548; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:57:43 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" In-Reply-To: <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D520316022ABA05@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> <17838240D9A5544AAA5FF95F8D520316022ABA05@ad-exh01.adhost.lan> Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Joe Holden , FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:57:45 -0000 Not for traceroute, no. On 6/15/07, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Hello: > > > > On 6/15/07, Joe Holden wrote: > > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >> zsquid# traceroute www.freebsd.org > > > >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 > byte > > > >> packets > > > >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms > > > > > > > > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as > > > > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... > > > Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? > > > -- > > > Joe Holden > > > T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 > > > E: joe@joeholden.co.uk > > > > Uh, don't know what those are, and I built this machine myself, from > > scratch, so I doubt it. > > > > All it's got on it is postfix (for mailing daily reports) and squid. > > It's pointed to our new T1, out a Watchguard firewall - we're going to > > use the old T1 for mail and traffic to our branch offices. > > > > > Do you have a Proxy of some sort on your network that might have cached > www.freebsd.org? > > Regards, > > Mike > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:28:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8C816A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from smtpclu-2.EUnet.yu (smtpclu-2.eunet.yu [194.247.192.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D4B13C4B7 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-220-201.eunet.yu [213.198.220.201]) by smtpclu-2.EUnet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5FLSDeU029278; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:28:16 +0200 Message-Id: <200706152128.l5FLSDeU029278@smtpclu-2.EUnet.yu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:28:22 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20070615214538.L62079@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214538.L62079@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_20,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -0.7 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-opera & java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:28:20 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > what should i install (preferably ports) to make java working in=20 > linux-opera? linux-flashplugin7, acroread & realplayer works in opera. Hello Wojciech, Please don't hijack threads. Install java/linux-blackdown-jdk14, then Tools->Preferences->Advanced. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:42:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243A716A468 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E58613C4B9 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827381A3C1C; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC10512C2; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:42:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AFF8CBE96; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:42:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:42:55 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jim Capozzoli Message-ID: <20070615214255.GA12923@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:42:57 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:25:12PM -0400, Jim Capozzoli wrote: > On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a uf= s3 > >> for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / &= =20 > >/usr and lets > >> use ZFS for /home > > > >ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so > >UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. > > > Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS > for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a > tradition or something. ;) Why couldn't one make it so you have ZFS > capability during a FreeBSD install, ZFS licensing isn't that bad is > it? It could be done. At the present time ZFS is not really suitable on systems without a lot of memory (I'd recommend at least 1GB). It is also very hard to tune it to perform well on i386 because of VM and address space issues. It might be possible to address these over time. Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGcwffWry0BWjoQKURAkjEAKCv8PKmkTIY+blfujpK8kMNJtvVmgCfQbP0 VepI9fISXY1NMGg7ZD2yaOs= =eTrY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 23:21:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB37316A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367A13C469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so1358955waf for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C6nn5SQHbGL0iKlZTy8UCzCISWPVnW7h0nU7utkJ4vIZrWvTbjp2O4Gm3K10w583EehdC7WGlysRzLxZGuZWk/og4woa1LCDLAmqX8KZlaakKmqwpF2QDYyH3/IOWkoOmlWK829QFYocEK1VnPy0DfbpnenFprnXAstPWKZuwWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZFnO8JOT8mCI0tiujak1S0W1CDOZJ9Kkn9qH91Z6GXAdvxIQXsZBYMbNQ0W6qfPT4hsFjY7ArBhFTIa5j9xPrwEgb9hgWtL+KqF7Kr8sRq570CL7ygZNXMnOmAAJEwRFvzapPSuquXMXIYEGRwNb4uBdToPugrrqklbDEt2YR9c= Received: by 10.115.74.1 with SMTP id b1mr3523919wal.1181949687476; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:21:27 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Chuck Swiger" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070615215116.A63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4672F1F0.4090707@joeholden.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: OK - I'm fairly clueless on this... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:21:28 -0000 On 6/15/07, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 15, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> >> traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33), 64 hops max, 40 byte > >> >> packets > >> >> 1 www.freebsd.org (69.147.83.33) 1.050 ms 0.970 ms 2.110 ms > >> > > >> > very short times suggest that the router (possibly NAT machine as > >> > 192.168 suggest) is doing strange things... > >> Do you have a bogus rdr/fwd in your config anywhere? > >> -- > >> Joe Holden > >> T: (UK) 02071009593 (AU) 282442321 > >> E: joe@joeholden.co.uk > > > > Uh, don't know what those are, and I built this machine myself, from > > scratch, so I doubt it. > > > > All it's got on it is postfix (for mailing daily reports) and squid. > > It's pointed to our new T1, out a Watchguard firewall - we're going to > > use the old T1 for mail and traffic to our branch offices. > > It would not be astonishing if your Watchguard firewall was blocking > or modifying the traceroute traffic and ICMP time exceeded packets > which result, unless someone has explicitly configured it to pass > traceroutes. > > However, the problem you've shown can also happen when something > things it should proxy-arp for all IPs, in other words, it will claim > that anything outside of the subnet it is actually on is really a > local IP and should go to that particular MAC address. > > Doing an "arp -a" and looking for dups should indicate whether this > sort of thing is happening... > > -- > -Chuck Problem solved, but this was indeed quite interesting. I've got several FreeBSD boxes scattered at various points through our network. After checking them, the ones that I had trouble with are those that are in the same subnet as our two firewalls. Doing a traceroute from the others worked just fine. However, 'arp -a' on the affected FreeBSD boxes (those in the subnet with the Watchguards) didn't reveal anything interesting. So, the Watchguards were doing *something*. OTOH, running tracert (the Windows version of traceroute) from a box on that same subnet worked just fine - that is, I get a full list of hops, etc. This is where the light started to shine.. I tried 'traceroute -P udp' and 'traceroute -P tcp', with no difference - that is, the machines in the same subnet got a single line back. However, if I specified 'tracert -I' (capital i - which means use ICMP) I get the output I expect from a traceroute command. As mentioned above, however, arp -a reveals no duplicates. Windows uses ICMP for its traceroutes, FreeBSD doesn't, by default, though it can. So, I took a look at my traceroute filter on the firewall, and found, finally, that it wasn't allowed from the subnet where my problem children were. I adjusted the filter on the firewall, and all is now happy. Thanks for your help, Chuck - it made the difference I needed to figure this out. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 01:20:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A916A41F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx (esfm.ipn.mx [148.204.102.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9DC13C43E for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx) Received: from localhost (localhost.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C00745528 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:12:39 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at esfm.ipn.mx Received: from mail.esfm.ipn.mx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.esfm.ipn.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Yo+Mv0J89SKb for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:12:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 210A945525; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:12:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esfm.ipn.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBC0452D2 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:12:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:12:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Viruena Silva To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070615200938.O6287@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: beryl/KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:20:00 -0000 Hi Guys, I have installed FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE in my computer, I also compiled and installed Xorg 7.2, KDE, and beryl, everything seems to be ok. Ok, now what? What do I have to do for KDE has the beryl effects? Any reference? Thanks in advance. Eduardo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 02:49:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B88616A41F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta15.adelphia.net (mta15.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9599513C447 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mta15.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with SMTP id <20070616024903.VKAH3928.mta15.adelphia.net@laptop> for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:49:03 -0400 From: "Bob" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:49:01 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: stopping "connect" attacks in apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:49:04 -0000 Every time my apache server slows down or has denial of service the access log is full this 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 216.39.53.3:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 216.39.53.1:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 168.95.5.155:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 168.95.5.157:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" 61.228.122.220 - "CONNECT 168.95.5.159:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 7034 "-" "-" I think I can stop this by adding this to my httpd-config SetEnvIf THE_REQUEST CONNECT* drop order allow,deny allow from all deny from env=drop Am I on the correct solutions here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 05:20:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830F016A41F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 05:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD9613C483 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 05:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ABabiy@shaw.ca) Received: from pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.9]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJP008LGQU44Y90@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:20:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJP00AN4QU4SQF1@pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:20:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.2.106] ([70.71.25.56]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJP008PJQTZ51D0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:20:23 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:20:22 -0700 From: Andriy Babiy In-reply-to: <36416.64.117.137.69.1181922309.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> To: FreeBSD-questions Message-id: <200706152220.22406.ABabiy@shaw.ca> Organization: home MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200706142213.52658.ABabiy@shaw.ca> <36416.64.117.137.69.1181922309.squirrel@webmail.ifxnw.cl> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Subject: Re: mail reader/agent for xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 05:20:28 -0000 > > Hi everybody, > > > > Could anyone share their experiences on which mail reader or agent > > they use with xfce4? Something simple, lightweight, with GUI, is > > highly desirable. I tried xmail, but it looks a bit complicated for my > > 8 years old son. Just for the record: FreeBSD i386 STABLE. > > Try Sylpheed. It's in the ports collection. I'll give it a try. And thanks to everybody for replies! Andriy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 08:33:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B02B16A400 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E3813C455 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml07.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.38.107]) by hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:26 +0200 Received: from KGISH ([84.83.61.253]) by hpsmtp-eml07.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:25 +0200 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:16 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c7aff0$fdcc6070$6601a8c0@KGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 Importance: Normal Thread-Index: Acev8Pw/ar9pSKsTTR+M+YYY279OZQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2007 08:33:25.0947 (UTC) FILETIME=[0208F8B0:01C7AFF1] Subject: Upgrade xorg 7.2 breaks legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:33:27 -0000 After I upgraded to xorg 7.2, I cannot get things to work anymore with = my legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver (I have a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop). Originally, I downloaded the FreeBSD legacy driver from the official = nvidia website and installed it under the then current X11BASE=3D/usr/X11R6. Everything worked just fine. Until the upgrade to xorg 7.2, that is. As instructed in the upgrade instructions, I changed ModulePath to "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" in xorg.conf, which I suspect is the root = of my problems, since the original working driver has remained installed in = the old X11BASE. I've tried to install the driver from the nvidia-driver-9631 ports directory, but after struggling forever with all kinds of errors, I gave = up and figured the best approach would be to somehow use my current setup, possibly copying and or linking to the right place. Should I just reinstall the driver, but which X11BASE? How to remove the original files without messing up my system even more? But I am not sure where to begin. Are there any kind folks out there who = can give me a hand?=20 Thanks alot in advance. --=20 Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 08:46:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E94116A469 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A1B13C4B9 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:46:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2007 08:46:51 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 16 Jun 2007 10:46:51 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/k4e1y1hHktYhQLCR9L7mtSJPtj9ZpFSRFNAmVZj K4LusPTVOP+yfx Message-ID: <4673A379.7090002@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:46:49 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <000201c7aff0$fdcc6070$6601a8c0@KGISH> In-Reply-To: <000201c7aff0$fdcc6070$6601a8c0@KGISH> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade xorg 7.2 breaks legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:46:54 -0000 Kiffin Gish wrote: > After I upgraded to xorg 7.2, I cannot get things to work anymore with my > legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver (I have a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop). > > Originally, I downloaded the FreeBSD legacy driver from the official nvidia > website and installed it under the then current X11BASE=/usr/X11R6. > Everything worked just fine. > > Until the upgrade to xorg 7.2, that is. > > As instructed in the upgrade instructions, I changed ModulePath to > "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" in xorg.conf, which I suspect is the root of > my problems, since the original working driver has remained installed in the > old X11BASE. > > I've tried to install the driver from the nvidia-driver-9631 ports > directory, but after struggling forever with all kinds of errors, I gave up > and figured the best approach would be to somehow use my current setup, > possibly copying and or linking to the right place. > > Should I just reinstall the driver, but which X11BASE? How to remove the > original files without messing up my system even more? > > But I am not sure where to begin. Are there any kind folks out there who can > give me a hand? > > Thanks alot in advance. > Start with reading /usr/ports/UPDATING From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 10:27:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A333B16A400 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@df46.dot5hosting.com) Received: from df46.dot5hosting.com (df46.dot5hosting.com [72.22.92.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89FE913C45B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@df46.dot5hosting.com) Received: (qmail 3323 invoked by uid 3128); 16 Jun 2007 09:53:33 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by df46.dot5hosting.com (envelope-from , uid 80) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88/1245. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):SA:0(3.0/5.0):. Processed in 2.074919 secs); 16 Jun 2007 09:53:33 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: +++ Date: 16 Jun 2007 09:53:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20070616095330.3277.qmail@df46.dot5hosting.com> To: questions@freebsd.org From: TD Group Financial Services Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Your Account Guarantee X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: services@tdcanadatrust.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:27:16 -0000 TD Canada Trust The EasyWeb Security Guarantee You will receive 100% reimbursement in the unlikely event account losses occur resulting from unauthorized EasyWeb activity. We've made a commitment to keeping your confidential information as safe as possible. Our safeguards to protect the security and integrity of customers' information include: IdentificationPlus. We have extensive security systems with new security measure that provides enhanced protection for you when you bank online with EasyWeb. In order to maintain the safety of your account we have locked your account with our new IdentificationPlus security. Please identify yourself and unlock your account below: [1]TD Canada bank IdentificationPlus Account Unlocking Guarantee. Do not set your email program to "auto-run" attachments. Always check that emails if you have received do not contain viruses by running your anti-virus software: [2]TD Canada bank Virus Check Understanding safeguards will help you play a vital role in protecting your security online. While we take strong measures to protect the security and privacy of your information, there are important steps that you should take to help protect your information when using the Internet: - [3]I'm interested. Tell me more. [4]Show me later. Go to EasyWeb. [5]I'm not interested. Go to EasyWeb. ^1 Customer Agreements include: Financial Services Terms, the Cardholder and Electronic Banking Services Terms and Conditions, Business Banking and Services Agreement, Business Services Master Agreement, Business Access Service Schedule and the EasyAccess Agreement. [6]Privacy Policy | [7]Internet Security | [8]Legal | TD Group Financial Services Site - Copyright © TD References 1. http://theappleupdate.com/favs/sites/ 2. http://theappleupdate.com/favs/sites/ 3. file://localhost/tmp/tmph4Cbdi.html 4. file://localhost/tmp/tmph4Cbdi.html 5. file://localhost/tmp/tmph4Cbdi.html 6. http://www.td.com/privacy/index_inc.jsp 7. http://theappleupdate.com/security/index.jsp 8. http://www.td.com/legal/index_inc.jsp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 10:45:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4C316A46C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61D413C487 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au (c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au [210.49.253.163]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5GAjjI4023644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:45:46 +1000 From: Gemma Fletcher Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200706152133.27118.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> <20070615114110.GA76255@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20070615114110.GA76255@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:45:57 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200706162045.57727.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: KDE 3.5 Crashing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:45:48 -0000 On Friday 15 June 2007 21:41, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=EDa Friday, June 15, 2007 a las 09:33:27PM +1000, Gemma Fletcher=20 escribi=F3: > Can you check if only X or KDE is frozen, or the system at all? > Try to connect from some other host on the network. > Try to do some RAM testing as well. > > matthias Ok my RAM is fine and dandy. I'm not sure how to check to see if only KDE = is=20 frozen. Once is freezes I can't do anything. Not even reset with=20 ctrl-alt-del. And my keyboard usually goes dead Its just me - so I have no other host to connect from. I did notice someth= ing=20 though that i forgot to mention- it usually only crashes if I am doing some= =20 internet related activity. If I= =20 just do normal stuff like spreadsheeting, or developing or whatever it seem= s=20 to run fine. Gemma From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 10:49:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8964216A498 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C671A13C4D0 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au (c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au [210.49.253.163]) by mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5GAnJa4029114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:49:20 +1000 From: Gemma Fletcher Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:49:32 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200706152133.27118.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> <200706161517.25578.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> <20070616085454.GA30865@albatros.sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20070616085454.GA30865@albatros.sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706162049.32131.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: KDE 3.5 Crashing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:49:26 -0000 On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:54, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Can you check if only X or KDE is frozen, or the system at all? > > > Try to connect from some other host on the network. > > > Try to do some RAM testing as well. > > Ok my RAM is fine and dandy. I'm not sure how to check to see if only > > KDE is frozen. Once is freezes I can't do anything. Not even reset with > > ctrl-alt-del. And my keyboard usually goes dead > light turning off> > > > > Its just me - so I have no other host to connect from. I did notice > > something > > You could launch some script in one of the consles (not in KDE) > like: > > while true; do date >> /tmp/log ; sync ; sleep 60 ; done > > and when it freeze wait some fife minutes before power cycle > and later check if the script continued while KDE was frozen; Ok will definatley try that. > > though that i forgot to mention- it usually only crashes if I am doing > > some internet related activity. > > If I just do normal stuff like spreadsheeting, or developing or whatever > > it seems to run fine. > > Is this with a Wifi card? No - although I do have a WiFi card installed that I am not using - it was from my wireless broadband days. Should i pull it out? > matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 11:05:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B7D16A468 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4935C13C447 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:05:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@nerdshack.com) Received: from dispatchd.nerdshack.com (julie.lavabit.com [72.249.41.31]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D65B2C7B0F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 06:05:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from endeavour.lordofunix.org (84.79.187.101) by mail.nerdshack.com with ESMTP Sat, 16 Jun 2007 06:05:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:05:17 +0200 From: Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070616130517.53648ff4.jlalarcon@nerdshack.com> In-Reply-To: <000201c7aff0$fdcc6070$6601a8c0@KGISH> References: <000201c7aff0$fdcc6070$6601a8c0@KGISH> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrade xorg 7.2 breaks legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:05:24 -0000 On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:16 +0200 "Kiffin Gish" wrote: > After I upgraded to xorg 7.2, I cannot get things to work anymore with my > legacy nvidia 1.0-9631 driver (I have a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop). > > Originally, I downloaded the FreeBSD legacy driver from the official nvidia > website and installed it under the then current X11BASE=/usr/X11R6. > Everything worked just fine. > > Until the upgrade to xorg 7.2, that is. > > As instructed in the upgrade instructions, I changed ModulePath to > "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" in xorg.conf, which I suspect is the root of > my problems, since the original working driver has remained installed in the > old X11BASE. > Hello again, Kiffin. Try to add this line to your /etc/X11/xorg.conf: ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" I want to say, mantain the module path "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules", but add too "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules". It's the way where Nvidia legacy driver 1.0-96xx still put the module when building. Maybe this guys adapt the driver to the new FreeBSD Xorg structure soon. Hope this help. Regards. Jose. > I've tried to install the driver from the nvidia-driver-9631 ports > directory, but after struggling forever with all kinds of errors, I gave up > and figured the best approach would be to somehow use my current setup, > possibly copying and or linking to the right place. > > Should I just reinstall the driver, but which X11BASE? How to remove the > original files without messing up my system even more? > > But I am not sure where to begin. Are there any kind folks out there who can > give me a hand? > > Thanks alot in advance. > > -- > Kiffin Rex Gish > Gouda, The Netherlands > -- http://www.lordofunix.org/ Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories..... You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 11:19:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D927116A469 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4AF13C45E for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slvhwke@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.160]) by fallbackmx01.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5FA1Ub1014560 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:01:30 +1000 Received: from c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au (c210-49-253-163.ipswc1.qld.optusnet.com.au [210.49.253.163]) by mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5FA1QOf010692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:01:28 +1000 From: Gemma Fletcher Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:01:36 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706152001.37198.slvhwke@optusnet.com.au> Subject: KDE 3.5 Crashing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:19:00 -0000 Hi list :) Installed BSD 6.2 a few days ago and am totally new to it all. I installed KDE 3.5 and it was working nicely until it just....stopped. No obvious crash - it just froze. Had to reboot the system with the reset button as no other method was working. So I thought it might be my sound and I had read a few things that said that sometimes caused KDE to crash. Also disabled a few buggy plugins and what not and still it keeps on freezing on me. The annoying thing is its totally random - It could be running for several hours before it freezes; and sometimes it freezes the moment I log on. Its frozen at last count 7 times today and I ended up having to do a some random hardrive check as boot up was starting to fail and logging me in as single mode user only. Anyway - to get to the point; is there a log somewhere that I can check out in console mode that might help me pinpoint the problem? Thanks in advance, Gemma From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 18:58:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41CC16A46B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C83313C457 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2290131pyi for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:58:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Xji7GyyUbdo9BxPLPre6EtkTt+0SRPpg+ciVLtUowvaVstDmCjbiQXkVijw+tm18XGfYLnH+ev5GifH6e9/wA3HqStwyEmCQU4wjM2qok4hPm3pcImvI/HgfD2mEIfaIljUs/0JEYoH1x0r3G1Ms9M/PNG1bPbUDDDz1xWLAZGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=XlqupxNLGjq1olv/vk0ntHxb4U0Z6yb+LspG4QHx5vX80gvRCHy+1KD52cD0DMlHTTpWXzEqjkW8Qn9q1yDIdxYRSO4RAwsndyoi37/MnRCKkuxmY9aLSDIBqfq87PhbrxxvumLtXY5L7ovCBDDmt6V86UfbTmH9UoPeg4S7v08= Received: by 10.65.114.11 with SMTP id r11mr7019942qbm.1182020295057; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.241.18 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:58:15 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: rsync and perms... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:58:16 -0000 Hi all, Trying to use rsync to update my home page in my freebsd, i am not able to keep the owner,group and perms of the files... I do all the updates in my ubntu. when everything is ready I run from my ubuntu: rsync -uav --delete --rsh=ssh /home/user/web/ root@ip_of_bsd:/root/web/ I tried also with -pog and same results... Files are updated but the perms and owner and group changes to the ones in my ubuntu.... I want to keep the bsd existing perms and users...How can i do that?? thanksss guys, Salutes, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 19:12:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF5416A400 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8D313C44B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@ayn.mi.celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB126866BACF; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:13:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id txJTJCD-ZfjT; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 3DDD768621E9B; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:13:46 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070616191346.GA32695@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 OpenPKG/2.5 Subject: Re: rsync and perms... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:12:27 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2007, Agus wrote: >Hi all, >Trying to use rsync to update my home page in my freebsd, i am not able to >keep the owner,group and perms of the files... >I do all the updates in my ubntu. when everything is ready I run from my >ubuntu: >rsync -uav --delete --rsh=ssh /home/user/web/ root@ip_of_bsd:/root/web/ > >I tried also with -pog and same results... > >Files are updated but the perms and owner and group changes to the ones in >my ubuntu.... > >I want to keep the bsd existing perms and users...How can i do that?? If the users and groups are the same on the system, the -a option to rsync should preserve owner, group, and permissions. One can also use rsync modules in the rsyncd.conf file to specify user and group. Using rsync modules also has the advantages of restricting access to the directory specified in the module, and can also restrict access based on IP addresses. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 http://www.celestial.com/ You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 19:20:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F01F16A468 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8BB13C4C1 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2297650pyi for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hI19JXU2tQa9YmlW827d3jGO6nQ6CEEuw10YySRhh1+sIlFg80FKp36gRb3R6OK6/em5ZTM+bU3jpogtX47d4mCrQS7MJYHlZH/fwgBXurjsaHpeozD/aUdrYp+uaMZnhqCUh6MCIZCfiHQADYJcJonUgbmcwHbcapZqCAbRHwg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Fmm8vt3i2gTcZjsT4GpoC0o/LN55RUYI/9/PVgCCYRccfeTB1lVsB9bd6PaPSsAOtSQ2sgS4/lR7STJCVYIGTIWroyDhaUj8myuEoRu8FxI6YRrelJQ84K5/YkTalElzw3QWJT5mn7am3qVQvzvAde8nhWUqt8Rvq1MpITaKETA= Received: by 10.64.195.20 with SMTP id s20mr7076511qbf.1182021642571; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.241.18 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:20:42 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070616191346.GA32695@ayn.mi.celestial.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070616191346.GA32695@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: rsync and perms... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:20:43 -0000 2007/6/16, Bill Campbell : > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007, Agus wrote: > >Hi all, > >Trying to use rsync to update my home page in my freebsd, i am not able > to > >keep the owner,group and perms of the files... > >I do all the updates in my ubntu. when everything is ready I run from my > >ubuntu: > >rsync -uav --delete --rsh=ssh /home/user/web/ root@ip_of_bsd:/root/web/ > > > >I tried also with -pog and same results... > > > >Files are updated but the perms and owner and group changes to the ones > in > >my ubuntu.... > > > >I want to keep the bsd existing perms and users...How can i do that?? > > If the users and groups are the same on the system, the -a option > to rsync should preserve owner, group, and permissions. > > One can also use rsync modules in the rsyncd.conf file to specify > user and group. Using rsync modules also has the advantages of > restricting access to the directory specified in the module, and > can also restrict access based on IP addresses. > > Bill > -- > INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC > URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way > FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) > 236-1676 > http://www.celestial.com/ > > You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a > reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating > the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for > independence. -- Charles A. Beard > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > OK...so i should first create a group an user with same ids on both machines? or only the names will suffice? And about the modules, i should be running the rsunc daemon which i am not, so i think i ll do the first... Thanks a lot for your help... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 19:50:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4D616A41F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5DF13C457 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5GJnWdc001220; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:49:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l5GJnWjI001219; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:49:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:49:32 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Agus Message-ID: <20070616194931.GA1188@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20070616191346.GA32695@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync and perms... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:50:11 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:20:42PM -0300, Agus wrote: > 2007/6/16, Bill Campbell : > > > >On Sat, Jun 16, 2007, Agus wrote: > >>Hi all, > >>Trying to use rsync to update my home page in my freebsd, i am not able > >to > >>keep the owner,group and perms of the files... > >>I do all the updates in my ubntu. when everything is ready I run from my > >>ubuntu: > >>rsync -uav --delete --rsh=ssh /home/user/web/ root@ip_of_bsd:/root/web/ > >> > >>I tried also with -pog and same results... > >> > >>Files are updated but the perms and owner and group changes to the ones > >in > >>my ubuntu.... > >> > >>I want to keep the bsd existing perms and users...How can i do that?? > > > >If the users and groups are the same on the system, the -a option > >to rsync should preserve owner, group, and permissions. > > > >One can also use rsync modules in the rsyncd.conf file to specify > >user and group. Using rsync modules also has the advantages of > >restricting access to the directory specified in the module, and > >can also restrict access based on IP addresses. > > > >Bill > >-- > >INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC > >URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way > >FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) > >236-1676 > >http://www.celestial.com/ > > > >You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a > >reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating > >the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for > >independence. -- Charles A. Beard > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > OK...so i should first create a group an user with same ids on both > machines? or only the names will suffice? > And about the modules, i should be running the rsunc daemon which i am not, > so i think i ll do the first... I believe the numerical UID and GID is what matters and has to be the same rather than the names. But correct me if I am wrong. ////jerry > > Thanks a lot for your help... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 23:51:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFFB16A46C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=hal=68029def1@cc.usu.edu) Received: from ironport2.usu.edu (ironport2.usu.edu [129.123.1.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A777613C45B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=hal=68029def1@cc.usu.edu) Received: from buffy.ncs.usu.edu (HELO [129.123.104.140]) ([129.123.104.140]) by ironport2.usu.edu with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2007 17:23:06 -0600 X-SBRS: None X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,430,1175493600"; d="scan'208"; a="74477966:sNHT12970783" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <42896645-B845-49ED-BDAC-318F16094209@cc.usu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: hal Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:23:05 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Help: apache22 and postgresql81 on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:51:51 -0000 I just did a fresh install of 6.2. When trying to build apache22 and postgresql81 from the ports collection each gives the following error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libkvm.so.2" not found, required by "gmake" So... what do I do now? Where can I find libkvm.so.2? Can someone give me a clue? hal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 23:55:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E00816A468 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=hl700=680172e57@cc.usu.edu) Received: from ironport2.usu.edu (ironport2.usu.edu [129.123.1.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670AC13C448 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=hl700=680172e57@cc.usu.edu) Received: from buffy.ncs.usu.edu (HELO [129.123.104.140]) ([129.123.104.140]) by ironport2.usu.edu with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2007 17:26:36 -0600 X-SBRS: None X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,430,1175493600"; d="scan'208"; a="74478986:sNHT16833670" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <03297CB0-E215-4286-B820-6FCF55E64E67@cc.usu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: hal Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:26:35 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Help: apache22 and postgresql81 on 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:55:16 -0000 I just did a fresh install of 6.2. When trying to build apache22 and postgresql81 from the ports collection each gives the following error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libkvm.so.2" not found, required by "gmake" So... what do I do now? Where can I find libkvm.so.2? Can someone give me a clue? hal