From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 11 15:29: 5 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 15:29:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.runet.edu (peloton.runet.edu [137.45.96.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940537B400; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.runet.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBBNSTR78078; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:28:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:28:29 -0500 (EST) From: Brett Taylor To: clefevre@cybercable.fr Cc: Cyrille Lefevre , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: latex2e vs. teTeX (was Re: ports/23355: ports/latex2html upgrader to 99.2b8) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Cyrille, On 11 Dec 2000, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > what is the rule about tex/latex2e vs. teTeX ? I don't know if there's an official rule about this, but teTeX has all of the functionality (and more) of tex/latex2. That's why I switched it, but maybe a discussion in ports needs to be made about it. ***************************************************** Dr. Brett Taylor brett@peloton.runet.edu * Dept of Chem and Physics * Curie 39A (540) 831-6147 * ***************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message