From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 18:29:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A23F16A406 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8AE13C4A3 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 30651 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 21:29:34 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 21:29:34 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180081, updated: 6.03.2007] Message-ID: <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: , "Ivan Voras" References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:27:16 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:29:37 -0000 >Artem Kuchin wrote: >> I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of >> different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and >> compare results with machine cost. >> Hope this will be usefull for someone. > >Several things: > >a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles" >of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you >copied it through Excel? Ummm... hmmm.. i checked the message in the list, nothimng is missing. Just like it was in the putty terminal from where i copied it. >b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on >amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. oh! that's good. will retest. >c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could >install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, >Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare >results :) I am not good at linux, but this is an interesting idea. I'll try it. Which one is easier to install? -- Regards Artem