From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 27 14:17:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF78937B424; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:17:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FA910F40F; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:17:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <008801c0e6f2$7978ae00$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Edwin Culp" , , References: <990996127.3b11669f737e4@Mail.CafeMania.Net> Subject: Re: Linux_Base port work around for Current? Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 16:17:45 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am installing current on a new box and I need jkd. That basically means > linux emulation. I haven't been able to build it for some time on current. > I have used the submitted PR to upgrade it to 7.? and it has worked except > I have problems with all other ports that need linux_base. Right now the > only solution is the upgrade that I see. Three questions: > > Does anyone have a better way? > > Has the PR/patch for ports been changed in the last few weeks? > > Is there a chance that it will be committed shortly? If I remember, > it has been there for a long time. It will stay there until I can upgrade the rest of the Linux ports to work with it, and its too big of a job for me alone. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message