Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:41:51 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster Message-ID: <200309051841.h85Ifpqi040719@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2003 09:54:42 MDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20030905095147.02cbbd90@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass writes: > >I'll start worrying when there is an enforceable precedent in my > >area. > > Better watch out in that case, since the Harrison case involved > a British defendant and an American plaintiff. So, the precedent > is already international. Aaah. Now that precedent scares me not, because in his case there was _substantial_ similarity between Plaintiff's tune and Defendant's tune. This similarity may be coincidental, but it is substantial, and US case law (the BSD vs USL case for example) has already provided a clarification of how far that might go in _code_. For code to be as substantially similar in a copyright-infringing way would take a clear, overt and actionable act, IMVHO. I still fail to see where _reading_, _modifying_ or _using_ GPL'ed code is dangerous, as long as one clearly bears normal copyright issues in mind. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309051841.h85Ifpqi040719>