From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 19 12:35:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7E416A4F1; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.csir.co.za) Received: from zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D900813C465; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.csir.co.za) Received: by zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (Postfix, from userid 3973) id B50BD33C94; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:09:16 +0200 (SAST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:09:16 +0200 From: John Hay To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Message-ID: <20070319120916.GA66306@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <45FE4E72.8000306@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , Kip Macy , cvs-all@freebsd.org, "gnn@freebsd.org" , cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 breakage in recent changes - Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:35:38 -0000 On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:16:38PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:48:50 +0100 > >>>>> Andre Oppermann said: > > andre> I thought I had tested IPv6 as well but as it turns out I have > andre> changed /etc/hosts to use IPv4 first instead of IPv6 as is the > andre> default. We should think of doing this in -current for 7.0 as > andre> well. IPv6 is quite a bit slower than IPv4 still and everything > andre> that uses localhost is affected by it. > > Now, ip6addrctl_enable is on by default on 7-CURRENT. So, if > ipv6_enable is off (default), an IPv4 address should be returned 1st, > without regarding the order in /etc/hosts. Is it insufficient for > you? The lengths we will go to keep the users of legacy protocols happy. :-) I was at the point of suggesting we should get rid of the #if INET6's in our code and just keep all the ipv4 and ipv6 code under a single #if INET umbrella. :-) John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@meraka.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org