Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 01:37:13 +0200 From: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/rtld-elf rtld.c Message-ID: <19990503013713.B280@broccoli.no-support.loc> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990501105137.jdp@polstra.com>; from John Polstra on Sat, May 01, 1999 at 10:51:37AM -0700 References: <19990430020203.A971@broccoli.no-support.loc> <XFMail.990501105137.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 01, 1999 at 10:51:37AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: [...] > One justifiable reason to deviate from the spec is if there is > some other factor which causes the rationale behind the spec to be > inapplicable to our situation. And maybe that is indeed the case > here. The spec says the search order should be: >=20 > RPATH in the shared object > LD_LIBRARY_PATH > /usr/lib I can't see any rationale behind this. Although I can imagine how you think about it. [...] > What do you think? In your opinion (totally unbiased, of course), > does this argument hold water? Sounds... sane. This interpretation of the spec -- it's still a draft, isn't it? -- seems to make sense. I like it. Now let's try to convince Daniel... Bj=F6rn --=20 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UB++++OSI++++$ P+++(-) L+++(--) !E W- N+ o>+ K- !w !O !M !V PS++ PE- PGP++ t+++ !5 X++ tv- b+++ D++ G e+ h-- y+=20 ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990503013713.B280>