Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:00:56 +0100 From: "Siegbert Baude" <Siegbert.Baude@gmx.de> To: <current@freebsd.org>, "Paul Fardy" <pdfardy@mac.com> Cc: <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: *_enable="YES" behavior is bogus Message-ID: <006a01c1ab52$c827bd00$4011a8c0@whwurm.uniulm.de> References: <5F46C986-16DB-11D6-8CEC-00039359034A@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, > But I think that the intent in /etc/rc.conf is that enable="NO" > _is_ the same thing as disabling it. You might say "If that were > the intent, they'd have used _______." What word should we use > to indicate the absolute YES or NO that some of us believe > should be the simple correct interpretation? I would suggest "foo_functionality". That is very clear, (albeit a bit long *g*). Ciao Siegbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006a01c1ab52$c827bd00$4011a8c0>