From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 8 23:19:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A661815269 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:19:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: (qmail 3669 invoked from network); 9 Sep 1999 06:18:42 -0000 Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.41) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 1999 06:18:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 01:18:42 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: "John W. DeBoskey" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: optional 'make release' speed-up patch In-Reply-To: <7125.936851836@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > No offense, but this is really pretty ugly for something that I'd > anticipate to be a *major* edge case. I've been building releases for > years, for example, and I've yet to build one on a filesystem all by > itself. I usually just cast around for some space on an existing > (shared) fs and go to it, and I suspect that many others are the same > way. :-) Every make release I have done has been on its own filesystem. I do have two entire disks that don't do anything useful, so I might be a weirdo. The way disk prices are going though, I don't know that this will stay that way. [I haven't looked at the patches, and don't really feel qualified to pass judgement on them.] David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message