Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
From:      spork <spork@super-g.com>
To:        David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: de0 problem 2.2-STABLE 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970729120342.3845A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
In-Reply-To: <199707290051.RAA28967@implode.root.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Another little thing I saw while looking at the source, I don't know
enough here to say what this would do, but at line 1370 there is a
spurious "^L".  I assume it's just a coincidence that this is part of the
section where it determines if the link is dead and downs the if...

   sc->tulip_probe_state = TULIP_PROBE_INACTIVE;
    tulip_21140_autonegotiate(sc, phy);
}
^L
static void
tulip_21140_nomii_media_preset(
    tulip_softc_t * const sc)

I'll take it out and recompile for fun as soon as my make world is done...

Charles

On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, David Greenman wrote:

> >I tried the Intel cards as well, but found that they had changed the rev
> >on them since DG put one in wcarchive.  What is the preferred PCI 10/100
> >card these days?
> 
>    All versions of the PCI Pro/100B should work fine in 2.2-stable. If there
> is a version that doesn't, I want to know about it.
> 
> -DG
> 
> David Greenman
> Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970729120342.3845A-100000>