Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:06:47 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/regression/lib/libc/resolv Makefile Message-ID: <20060308150647.GG737@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <86ek1dwfa6.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200603071426.k27EQI4a096772@repoman.freebsd.org> <86hd69u8rc.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060308071705.GJ62485@garage.freebsd.pl> <86ek1dwfa6.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:45:37AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes: +> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: +> > > > Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> writes: +> > > > > Log: +> > > > > NOMAN --> NO_MAN +> > > > No, the correct spelling is +> > > > MAN=3D +> > Since when? I found 36 NO_MAN=3D's in my tree and none 'MAN=3D'. +>=20 +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9]. The fact that many old Makefiles still +> use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob, not a +> Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and USE_FOO in the +> ports tree). Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN=3D uses, so it doesn't create confusion? --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEDvMHForvXbEpPzQRAoaFAKDBf9NbTI+NdKsMSiVQf2I/62LLygCg8WYk ffy3+G2+4XGl/xJv/Fygd0A= =KwH1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DNUSDXU7R7AVVM8C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060308150647.GG737>