From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 18:09:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBC910656ED; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@freebsd.org) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2D58FC26; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e.earth.lavabit.com (e.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.14]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA411B80D; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:37:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 10.0.10.3 (54.81.54.77.rev.vodafone.pt [77.54.81.54]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id C095RT4RC0AQ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:37:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:37:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <65F17C45-55C1-4349-A4D1-A3D6AD0D9A80@FreeBSD.org> References: To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: "arch@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:09:53 -0000 On 18 Aug 2010, at 18:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with = the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix = it for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is = low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) >=20 > Later versions of icc are more gcc compliant aren't they? If so, > wouldn't this also be a non-issue to remove the bits, or are there > still some incompatibilities between gcc and icc that are worth > noting? I really don't know how compatible is the latest icc because no one ever = updated the ports version. This is actually a hint that no one really = uses this anymore. Regards, -- Rui Paulo