From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Feb 6 21:33:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA07778 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 21:33:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA07764 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 21:33:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:XKyFkbzL7xtjKlml21vbgE+L9kLr2aQk@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA09330; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 14:32:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id OAA02106; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 14:35:20 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199902070535.OAA02106@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Bill Fenner cc: Wolfram Schneider , bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Fx and Os macros (was: Re: [yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp: .Fx and .Os macros in groff, FreeBSD]) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Feb 1999 16:25:44 JST." <199902060725.QAA07495@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> References: <199902060405.UAA20537@mango.parc.xerox.com> <199902060725.QAA07495@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 14:35:14 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>>We should fix these macros in time for 3.1-RELEASE. Would you do it, >>>or shall I? >> >>Well, I'd like to see if there's anyone who knows why the macros >>were the way they were ("because nobody really knew *roff" is a >>likely answer) and if there's a reason not to make this kind of >>change... > >I see wosch, pst, and mpp touched these macros from time to time, >according to cvs logs. They may know something. > >Kazu As 3.1-RELEASE is coming up very soon, I would commit my original patch, which keeps the same style as the current code, as an interim measure. Then, we should go for your better solution once we hear from the others why the current code is the way it is, and it becomes clear that there is no good reason to keep the current style of the code. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message