Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:53:18 -0400 From: Greg Pavelcak <g.pavelcak@comcast.net> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Devil Mascot Message-ID: <20040614175318.GA549@bsd.home.net> In-Reply-To: <20040614083140.4c8c12e5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <PBEKIEKOFFNDMPHOGDIJKEHFCAAA.edwardmh@pwaccess.com> <20040614083140.4c8c12e5.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > This has come up 100000000 times. It's simply not going to happen because the > beastie has too much historical significance. It's a matter of pride that the > beastie mascot has more history than the Linux penguin and the Microshit > butterfly put together. Besides, he wasn't designed to be "market friendly", > he was designed to be a technical pun (he's not a devil, he's a daemon) > > There are wild, baseless predictions that the world will reject FreeBSD because > of the beastie every 6 months or so. Aside from the fact that I don't believe > it, it simply doesn't bear out in reality. There are more people hijacking the > beastie to use as a logo for other things than I can keep track of. I've seen > more renditions of the beastie in artwork than both the penguin and the > butterfly combined. The simple fact is that _most_ people like the beastie, > and the few who are horribly offended by it don't seem to be significant in any > way. > Actually, it's hard to tell if they're hijacking beastie or Sparkie, the Arizona State Sun Devil. I understand that Sparkie was done by a Disney animator, but I don't know when he was born. He easily goes back to the early seventies. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614175318.GA549>