From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 18:06:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1804916A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:06:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from salvador.pacific.net.sg (salvador.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2293943D1D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:06:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 3692 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 18:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by salvador with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 18:06:42 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.109] ([210.24.124.198]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP <20050214180641.FEAW1207.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.109]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:06:41 +0800 Message-ID: <4210E930.2080500@pacific.net.sg> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:08:48 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AD9@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <4210915F.9060602@401.cx> <2fd864e050214085579b3202a@mail.gmail.com> <4210DE89.5060003@401.cx> In-Reply-To: <4210DE89.5060003@401.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Johnson David cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 4.0: Logo contest, and lessons from the XFree86 d ebacle X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:06:45 -0000 Hi, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > Astrodog wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:54:07 +0100, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg >> wrote: >> >>> Johnson David wrote: >>> >>>> From: Farid Hajji [mailto:farid.hajji@ob.kamp.net] >>>> >> I would like to point out that Turbo-Linux, BeOS, and OS/2, are all >> currently marketed worse than FreeBSD. ;) > > > And afaik, both BeOS and OS/2 are dead. > None of them died because of inferior quality or lack of innovation. > If I remember right, all of them have good logos. Erich