From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  1 04:09:13 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC9216A416
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Jul 2006 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9916F43D49
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Jul 2006 04:09:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k61499O7088559
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k61499eT088558
	for current@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
To: current@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:09:08 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVihy+z3/UR{6SCQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200607010009.09231@aldan>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:17:59 +0000
Cc: 
Subject: weird limitation on the system's binutils
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 04:09:13 -0000

Hello!

I'm wondering, why the bfd and related bits and pieces of binutils are built 
to support only the architecture(s), that can natively run on the system?

Why can't I use gdb or objdump on FreeBSD/i386 to analyze a core file, or a 
binary from another FreeBSD or even from a non-FreeBSD system?

The tools themselves support that. The sources (bfd-vectors) for all other 
supported architectures are part of the tree (under contrib/). So, why not 
build them?

If it really is SO much of a bloat, why do we install gdb, etc. in the first 
place?

	-mi

P.S. What I also want is the /lib/libbfd.so and friends, so I (and the 15 
devel/*binutils ports) can build my own tools linking with it. Unfortunately, 
that too remains impossible...