Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:14:09 -0500 From: Patrick Gardella <patrick@freebsd.org> To: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net> Cc: Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net>, freebsd-small@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: StrongARM support? Message-ID: <3A3FC191.8C6AD28E@freebsd.org> References: <78656.976769151@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <3A3862E4.5A46E14C@wireless.net> <20001218151235.D69041@peorth.iteration.net> <3A3EA852.A668B554@wireless.net> <20001219125657.A94588@peorth.iteration.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Michael C . Wu" wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled: > | "Michael C . Wu" wrote: > | > The most important decision now would be: > | > Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each > | > port simultaneously? > | > | Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are interested in > | helping with the effort then perhaps pursuing the PPC port first would > | make more sense. I don't have a PPC so I couldn't help out there... > | > | If the decision is to pursue a StrongARM port then you can count me in. > > I'm definitely interested in both StrongARM and PPC. (and so are very > many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM, > but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an > official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though. It's mainly a matter of interest (interested, dedicated people) rather than an official decision. I would say "go for it", and if it comes about, then great. If not, oh, well. Patrick patrick@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A3FC191.8C6AD28E>