Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:29:57 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>
Cc:        Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New sendmail users (was Re: HEADS UP: Apache port change from  nobody:nogroup to www:www planned)
Message-ID:  <3BD05505.85699483@mindspring.com>
References:  <29611.1003411145@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <xzpofn5dqqk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <15311.1383.814782.672622@horsey.gshapiro.net> <3BCF1A60.13C78B28@DougBarton.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> 
>         My only objection is the name of the user for uid 25. It should be
> smtp, both to match the service name for the port, and to make it more
> generic which will help us avoid the inevitable whining and crying from
> the anti-sendmail crowd. Port 26 is currently unassigned, so it's as
> good a candidate for your mailnull user as any. I think that name is a
> little wacky, but since that's the default in sendmail and there's no
> contenders for port 26, it's as good as any I suppose. :)

We independently arrived at "mailnull" for the IBM Web Connections
NOC, so count me as one vote in favor of the name.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BD05505.85699483>