From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 17 22:48:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E39616A40F for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [212.100.226.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1644243D46 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pobox@verysmall.org) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (chello084114134105.3.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.134.105]) by thing.verysmall.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC182282E; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:47:32 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <450DD0C0.3060609@verysmall.org> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:48:32 +0200 From: "pobox@verysmall.org" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <450DC9D9.6050000@verysmall.org> <450DCEDB.9080301@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <450DCEDB.9080301@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:48:40 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > pobox@verysmall.org wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to apply a patch set to FreeBSD 5.5 (this letter 'p' >> followed by a number, after the version in 'uname -a') - but somehow it >> did not work. >> >> I cvsup-ed the src using the standard 'stable-supfile' with '*default >> release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_5' - then I rebuild world. >> >> Now 'uname -a' reports 'FreeBSD 5.5 STABLE #0'. Before it was 'FreeBSD >> 5.5 RELEASE #0'. So instead of applying patch set I have moved to 'STABLE'. >> >> Could somebody tell me what have I done wrong? Actually - what is the >> difference between the 'pX' and the '#X' after the version? > > You've shifted your self onto the RELENG_5 code branch rather than the > RELENG_5_5 branch. Yes... but how did it happen after I instructed the supfile to get 'RELENG_5_5'? Actually in the examples/cvsup I did not find any example how to do 'release'. Thank you for the other answers! Iv.