Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:56:30 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20021029105630.O89245@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <15806.37687.91334.549008@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>; from gallatin@cs.duke.edu on Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:55:03AM -0500 References: <200210241942.g9OJgGg6093678@bowie.private> <15800.21949.518746.273369@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021024183915.A89245@locore.ca> <20021029111603.GC4446@dragon.nuxi.com> <15806.37687.91334.549008@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:55:03AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of; > > David O'Brien writes: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD, > > > IIRC a 500mhz blade 100 does a buildworld in around 2-3 hours. > > > > A $1000 (new) 500 MHz blade running GENERIC (minus WITNESS) builds world > > in a little under 3 hours. > > Or just a little slower than my 4 year old 500MHz 21264 (<$1000 used) > alpha. Darn. I was hoping a reasonbly priced sparc64 would be fast > enough that getting one would allow me to find LP64 problems quicker > due to a faster buildworld cycle. It's really frustrating to get 2+ > hours into a buildworld and have it die because of a problem in > usr.sbin > > I guess we'll need to wait for x86-64 for that. Cross build on a fast x86 box... My 1.2ghz athlon running -stable builds a sparc64 world in about half an hour. Jake To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021029105630.O89245>