Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:20:01 +0000
From:      Rasputin <rasputin@submonkey.net>
To:        "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /etc/make.conf question
Message-ID:  <20020313102001.A2332@shikima.mine.nu>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2>; from jeff-ml@mountin.net on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:07:00PM -0600
References:  <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> <Pine.GSO.4.32.0203121126520.1546-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020312074349.A91204@blackhelicopters.org> <20020312155618.GA9463@raggedclown.net> <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> <shk7sha9n2.7sh@localhost.localdomain> <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeffrey J. Mountin <jeff-ml@mountin.net> [020312 20:09]:
> At 11:06 AM 3/12/02 -0800, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> >Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> writes:
> >
> > > Remember, the correct dance for an upgrade these days includes the 
> > following:
> > >
> > > make buildworld
> > > make buildkernel
> > > make installkernel
> > > <reboot, single-user>
> > > make installworld
> > > mergemaster
> > > <reboot>

> >I replace the second two steps with "make kernel".
> >I'd be glad to know any disadvantage of that not shared by the two-step.

> Besides the fact that your modules are stale (make.conf change required to 
> avoid that) or that you are on your own when doing "unsupported" 
> procedures.  

Really? I'm sure it's just 'buildkernel installkernel', therefore
the installkernel target should only run in buildkernel succeeds.

-- 
Die, v.:
	To stop sinning suddenly.
		-- Elbert Hubbard
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns ::

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020313102001.A2332>