From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 00:10:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89C81065675 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27588FC24 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135AA509DE for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbramAVdu8Bd for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0D899509C4; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090208001002.0D899509C4@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2009-02-07 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:10:07 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . RECENT ARTICLES: 2-Dec : Obscuring smtp auth headers If you consider your smtp-auth location to be private, this is what you want. http://freebsddiary.org/smtp-headers-rewrite-auth.php?2 29-Nov : OpenVPN - creating a routed VPN If you have multiple VPN clients, this is a practical solution. http://freebsddiary.org/openvpn-routed.php?2 27-Nov : Creating your own Certificate Authority How to create a CA and generate your own SSL certificates http://freebsddiary.org/openvpn-easy-rsa.php?2 27-Nov : OpenVPN - getting it running Using OpenVPN to create a secure pathway between home and office http://freebsddiary.org/openvpn.php?2 5-Oct : Removing dead mailing lists from Mailman Mailing lists can outlive their usefulness http://freebsddiary.org/mailman-removing-dead-lists.php?2 30-Aug : gmirror - recovering from a failed HDD an HDD failed. gmirror to the rescue. http://freebsddiary.org/gmirror-failure.php?2 6-Jul : ezjail - A jail administration framework This makes jails easier http://freebsddiary.org/ezjail.php?2 24-Jun : Adding gmirror to an existing installation Adding RAID-1 to an existing FreeBSD 7 installation http://freebsddiary.org/gmirror.php?2 20-Mar : ThinkPad x61s Unpacking the box, installing PC-BSD http://freebsddiary.org/thinkpad-x61s.php?2 17-Mar : Using two monitors with X.org The GeForce 8600 GT with two monitors http://freebsddiary.org/xorg-two-screens.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 00:32:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C75106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A707D8FC0C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (213-84-73-82.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n180HRwd046322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:17:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n180HQpf003596 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:17:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:17:26 +0100 From: Marco Beishuizen To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Subject: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:32:02 -0000 Hi, Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again: ... (soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". ... I'm running FreeBSD-7.1-stable with x.org 7.4 with Gnome 2.24. anyone an idea? Thanks in advance Marco -- Put a pot of chili on the stove to simmer. Let it simmer. Meanwhile, broil a good steak. Eat the steak. Let the chili simmer. Ignore it. -- Recipe for chili from Allan Shrivers, former governor of Texas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 01:02:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69430106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B64E8FC22 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2009 20:02:34 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18830.12073.689325.361229@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:02:33 -0500 To: Marco Beishuizen In-Reply-To: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> References: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:02:35 -0000 Marco Beishuizen writes: > (soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment > with non-zero page size is deprecated > > I'm running FreeBSD-7.1-stable with x.org 7.4 with Gnome 2.24. > anyone an idea? 1) have you read and followed the steps in /usr/ports/UPDATING? Including the one for libxcb? 2) if you have, this: > Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". should be harmless. It reports a pieve of functionality which does not exist in the server but does in one of the loaded modules (where it should have been masked). Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 01:05:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931A61065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FEE8FC1B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0KEQ00GIA1NLCP70@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n180ZheR002395; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:44 -0500 Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> To: Marco Beishuizen Message-id: <498E28DF.1060003@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090202) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:05:47 -0000 Marco Beishuizen wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to run OO-3.0.1 crashes OO with the following error messages and > ends into and enless loop trying to restart and crashing again: > ... > (soffice:2726): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment > with non-zero page size is deprecated Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event > Extension" missing on display ":0.0". > ... > > I'm running FreeBSD-7.1-stable with x.org 7.4 with Gnome 2.24. > anyone an idea? > > Thanks in advance > Marco > > > Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 02:19:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEEE1065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opt1k2@mail.ru) Received: from mx44.mail.ru (mx44.mail.ru [195.239.211.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62338FC17 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opt1k2@mail.ru) Received: from f71.mail.ru (f71.mail.ru [194.67.57.222]) by mx44.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 990F938003927 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:40:58 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail by f71.mail.ru with local id 1LVyfI-000FdE-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:40:56 +0300 Received: from [79.120.80.43] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:40:56 +0300 From: Alexey Beketov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [79.120.80.43] Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:40:56 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Subject: kerberos and openldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexey Beketov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:19:02 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to setup replace AD with samba, already have working samba+ldap. And stuck with kerberos. pkg_info: heimdal-1.0.1 nss_ldap-1.264_1 openldap-client-2.4.13 openldap-server-2.4.13 cat /etc/krb5.conf default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log [libdefaults] default_realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL [realms] DOMAIN.LOCAL = { admin_server = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL default_domain = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL kdc = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL } [domain_realm] .domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL [kdc] database = { dbname = ldap:ou=KerberosPrincipals,dc=domain,dc=local acl_file = /var/heimdal/kadmind.acl } addresses = 127.0.0.1 192.168.6.23 cat /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf L: 1 C: 1 ===================================================================== include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/hdb.schema pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap loglevel 256 logfile /var/db/openldap-data/slapd.log moduleload back_bdb allow update_anon access to attrs=userPassword,shadowLastChange,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword by self write by anonymous auth by * none access to * by self write by anonymous read by sockurl="^ldapi:///$" write by * none database bdb suffix "dc=domain,dc=local" rootdn "cn=admin,dc=domain,dc=local" rootpw {SSHA}somepasshehe directory /var/db/openldap-data index uid,uidNumber,gidNumber,memberUid eq index cn,mail,surname,givenname eq,subinitial index sambaSID eq index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq index sambaDomainName eq index objectClass eq #index cn eq,sub,pres #index uid eq,sub,pres index displayName eq,sub,pres index krb5PrincipalName eq server# kadmin -l kadmin> init DOMAIN.LOCAL Realm max ticket life [unlimited]: Realm max renewable ticket life [unlimited]: kadmin> add admin Max ticket life [1 day]: Max renewable life [1 week]: Principal expiration time [never]: Password expiration time [never]: Attributes []: admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: Verifying - admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: ***************************erro here*********************** admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client (admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL) unknown *********************************************************** how to fix the error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 03:13:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0585106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f14.google.com (mail-fx0-f14.google.com [209.85.220.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5CD8FC13 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so309475fxm.19 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:13:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RxJu8AIhZsK/+J16vClwpqMtpXAIjtSlN5Xb+gR9kzY=; b=SJB/oOBAD75GsHip+3fr6FB9gVUc9RtP0oilAB5DFpQ6k7pIFD7du4p5Eys1wDHPlf e+lUoe35hAx5y+SdImNJyy/unC3A1MY3r+Ip8p82W9BpLjNAN2AvAWvCe9CdCanWvvr7 qXJIjLAHCBPy4TXwk9DGQeOK/sYQLeZSYwhLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hBrD3qb0cRWYXSlYlnvnQOQFnoQ3NbGttfKk5QF+WbrqI5JYQD1lb/VdPpbN+lQfMo cmaUc9idy+eIQV+CNS3shedtDVycTsSIPySjqvUII7sAVfargJGl7Q094bypF1TPHSy2 pd3VyOcCfUWJZEmRT7wk/AzngFclqwu2i1PJI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.192.10 with SMTP id u10mr1230001bkp.185.1234062792848; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:13:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <498C2EE1.4090108@gmail.com> References: <28283d910902060427m5764b1q170d4441adf6b519@mail.gmail.com> <498C2EE1.4090108@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:13:12 -0500 Message-ID: <28283d910902071913q478af933vf62e728e85540196@mail.gmail.com> From: matt donovan To: Matias Surdi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom build fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:13:15 -0000 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Matias Surdi wrote: > I'm currently running the following command: > > > # Make the release > cd /usr/src/release > make release \ > CHROOTDIR=/home/oms \ > BUILDNAME=OpenMailServer \ > CVSROOT=/home/ncvs \ > RELEASETAG=RELENG_7 \ > NODOC=YES \ > NO_FLOPPIES=YES \ > NOPORTS=YES \ > RELEASENOUPDATE=YES \ > MAKE_ISOS=YES \ > WORLD_FLAGS=" -DWITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN" \ > LOCAL_PATCHES=$DIR/oms.diff \ > LOCAL_SCRIPT=$DIR/local_script.sh \ > PATCH_FLAGS=-p3 > > > > Do you know how can set this up in order to get that variable to be on the > build process and not on the install/release process? > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Matias. > > > > > matt donovan wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Matias Surdi >> wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm building a custom freeBSD release and I'm getting the following >>> error: >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> Building an up-to-date make(1) >>>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/usr/src/usr.bin/make created for >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make >>> rm -f .depend >>> mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make >>> -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\" -DDEFSHELLNAME=\"sh\" >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash_tables.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/lst.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/proc.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/shell.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c >>> /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c >>> cc: not found >>> mkdep: compile failed >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/make. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src. >>> + exit 1 >>> + umount /dev >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src/release. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> These are just the last lines, I can post the entire log if needed, but >>> it >>> is quite large. >>> >>> >>> The source code is from 7.0-RELEASE, and my src.conf is the following: >>> WITHOUT_ATM= >>> WITHOUT_AUTHPF= >>> WITHOUT_BIND= >>> WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH= >>> WITHOUT_CALENDAR= >>> WITHOUT_CDDL= >>> WITHOUT_CPP= >>> WITHOUT_CVS= >>> WITHOUT_CXX= >>> WITHOUT_DICT= >>> WITHOUT_EXAMPLES= >>> WITHOUT_FORTH= >>> WITHOUT_GAMES= >>> WITHOUT_GDB= >>> WITHOUT_GPIB= >>> WITHOUT_GROFF= >>> WITHOUT_GSSAPI= >>> WITHOUT_GESIOD= >>> WITHOUT_GNU= >>> WITHOUT_HTML= >>> WITHOUT_I4B= >>> WITHOUT_IDEA= >>> WITHOUT_INFO= >>> WITHOUT_IPFILTER= >>> WITHOUT_IPX= >>> WITHOUT_KERBEROS= >>> WITHOUT_LOCALES= >>> WITHOUT_LPR= >>> WITHOUT_MAN= >>> WITHOUT_NCP= >>> WITHOUT_NLS= >>> WITHOUT_NIS= >>> WITHOUT_OBJC= >>> WITHOUT_RCMDS= >>> WITHOUT_RCS= >>> WITHOUT_SENDMAIL= >>> WITHOUT_SHAREDOCS= >>> WITHOUT_SSP= >>> WITHOUT_TCSH= >>> WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN= >>> WITHOUT_WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOOL= >>> WITHOUT_ZFS= >>> >>> >>> The problem seems to arise when any of WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, WITHOUT_CXX or >>> WITHOUTH_CPP are present. >>> >>> >>> On this build, I don't want to have any development tools, as I'm trying >>> to reduce the size at a minimum. >>> >>> Why is "make" being build? How can I avoid this? >>> >>> If you need more info in order to help me, tell me what do you need >>> please. >>> >>> Thanks for any help >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> You need >> WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN= to build you can add that after you do a build >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Remove WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN when building but when you do the install you can readd it I m not sure how you would do it using the make release though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 04:13:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B7C1065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [220.233.188.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475888FC0C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n184DXSB019896; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:13:33 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:13:32 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Dmitry In-Reply-To: <20090207175131.00DFB106572F@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20090208142716.L38905@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20090207175131.00DFB106572F@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: #2 DNS Auto in KPPP in FreeBSD 7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:13:37 -0000 On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:30:58 +0300 Dmitry wrote: > Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English. My problem: I am have 3G/EDGE > modem ZTE MF622+ and FreeBSD 7.1. In using KPPP (KDE 3.5.10) my modem > can't connect to EDGE provider, because in KPPP not enabled option > Auto DNS setting. If manually set this option, that says tech support > of provider, pppd print, that not connect and not determinate IP > adress. Why I can enable this option? In Linux this option is enabled > and all working fine. Thank you! pppd(8) has not had any serious work done on it for over two years, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/pppd/main.c There was some talk in -net of dropping support for it altogether. The KPPP authors have so far declined to consider adding support for FreeBSD's ppp(8), due perhaps to their primarily Linux orientation. I suggest instead using either ppp(8) - which is extensively supported by the FreeBSD Handbook and in the mailing lists - or the net/mpd5 port, which uses in-kernel netgraph modules. Both support fetching upstream DNS addresses. I happily used ppp(8) for 10 years, but now prefer mpd. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 08:41:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F2B1065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02AA8FC1D for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1494344rvf.43 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:41:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VoL/ru+PrNciszs26o/r+2dTKAdGfKMdylxZQLIOClk=; b=AFxwvOg0yJrFB+6IlaJqUwV03DxzL78uvjNQpnJLYk38W2P+wzADLaXkZh4D0TAaBE 1z2wV7a0nC6yXclSKqo9UrwLAhl8kPVNCKo5SXUYm3Cxo+GDF5FNS8vCV38EFT83kfuz 4c5ysLPr/xBmVu3CA+Y1f7a0fP+VX4iILK6hA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UQHDqcIqrr2OjhtgTS3xT/EHxnz0YdyGIsHhasrSYP3nuu7meLqMY/jUR6m6T8/hDy +StKg5oL59ZmCLc7mLifG3m0HZq88LWIOiWZCHmlRqEJ/F2WE0Yiv5yALLrM1631Gnyg mwnd/8e5wuwtuGOKG6UGydumOntss+rH1qbEI= Received: by 10.140.127.20 with SMTP id z20mr2831767rvc.100.1234082471797; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:41:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k37sm8528211rvb.0.2009.02.08.00.41.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:41:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <498E9AA1.8030506@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:41:05 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Beketov , freebsd general questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: kerberos and openldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:41:13 -0000 Alexey Beketov wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to setup replace AD with samba, already have working samba+ldap. And stuck with kerberos. > pkg_info: > heimdal-1.0.1 > nss_ldap-1.264_1 > openldap-client-2.4.13 > openldap-server-2.4.13 > > > cat /etc/krb5.conf > default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log > kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log > admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log > > [libdefaults] > default_realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL > > [realms] > DOMAIN.LOCAL = { admin_server = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL > default_domain = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL > kdc = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL > } > > [domain_realm] > .domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL > > > [kdc] > database = { > dbname = ldap:ou=KerberosPrincipals,dc=domain,dc=local > acl_file = /var/heimdal/kadmind.acl > } > addresses = 127.0.0.1 192.168.6.23 > > cat /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf > L: 1 C: 1 ===================================================================== > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema > include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/hdb.schema > > > pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid > > argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args > > modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap > > > > > loglevel 256 > > logfile /var/db/openldap-data/slapd.log > > > moduleload back_bdb > > allow update_anon > > access to attrs=userPassword,shadowLastChange,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword > by self write > by anonymous auth > by * none > > access to * > by self write > by anonymous read > by sockurl="^ldapi:///$" write > by * none > database bdb > > suffix "dc=domain,dc=local" > > rootdn "cn=admin,dc=domain,dc=local" > > rootpw {SSHA}somepasshehe > > directory /var/db/openldap-data > > > index uid,uidNumber,gidNumber,memberUid eq > index cn,mail,surname,givenname eq,subinitial > index sambaSID eq > index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq > index sambaDomainName eq > index objectClass eq > #index cn eq,sub,pres > #index uid eq,sub,pres > index displayName eq,sub,pres > index krb5PrincipalName eq > > server# kadmin -l > kadmin> init DOMAIN.LOCAL > Realm max ticket life [unlimited]: > Realm max renewable ticket life [unlimited]: > kadmin> add admin > Max ticket life [1 day]: > Max renewable life [1 week]: > Principal expiration time [never]: > Password expiration time [never]: > Attributes []: > admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: > Verifying - admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: > > ***************************erro here*********************** > admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL's Password: > kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client (admin@DOMAIN.LOCAL) unknown > *********************************************************** > > how to fix the error? Have you read the FreeBSD handbook about kerberos? Have you setup the SRV records in DNS for kerberos? Those would be my first places to check. I'm not dedicating myself to do an open-source AD replacement, but it is something on my list I want to do soon. Your help and input would be appreciated, given my goal soon too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 08:46:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A730C1065677 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740018FC27 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1495134rvf.43 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:46:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=buZjpnQrSahBrR1ZOUc5Bafv5Iap/8OqkYS+B6ZiYDs=; b=Fs0Vm08D93TLtIBIUcKkA2Jo+V8zgUU5AEDVwxvr1htovM7tviU2voZ4hVdSuu4n7A 75gMzbisjQ0u0UgZgcOVMqE+S0Eq0WpTFHAaTpf4AM20iolGqeXGgjfFJHJvut23OqpW cDVwlPELGohqocnlvUg+PVS4NDCEH7lETzrIM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ueLSoIT1OTAFRSqetq6X3EBInaF5GSXfMYTrSWRlJ/EB8Mf5EHGG5DBiVVkovm4v78 Fi7nMUG9+Gu60JVVBwqwQKGAG8n6f5ChnliN0bekaPus/ev/51YGN9DOWWLaKwg04jf/ hVPGiKCXD740z2JiB/nR8YG3iNbZ4ZaOSlHGo= Received: by 10.141.210.2 with SMTP id m2mr2839146rvq.48.1234082760108; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm11336197rvf.1.2009.02.08.00.45.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:45:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <498E9BC7.5010808@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:45:59 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valentin Bud References: <139b44430902070752g17296e5cr6a910baa6c15386a@mail.gmail.com> <873aeqcjw5.fsf@kobe.laptop> <139b44430902070810n4215d90at777c824b94161a2d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <139b44430902070810n4215d90at777c824b94161a2d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: make installworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:46:01 -0000 Valentin Bud wrote: > Hello, > > This are the parts from /etc/make.conf regarding system build options: > # --- system build options > WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes > WITHOUT_IPX=yes > WITHOUT_LPR=yes > WITHOUT_RCMDS=yes > WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes > > I didn't give any arguments to > # make buildworld or > # make installworld > > I have ran them as i've typed them above. > > Is there something wrong in /etc/make.conf ? I should make sure it's mentioned -- FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD world ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ statements were ignored. --Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 08:51:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC85106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFF98FC0A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1496152rvf.43 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:51:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C8bN8QnD6p19TopgcFot17DiYK6Tklc4cONN8jpZCTc=; b=U6EYneF6TuM1KDRJVEADuznI07cqoBuhYpEacj6zfhe2oakAZYkx4EQgbDFThePkhA IdoNr2sxyftFot0NeO75qELKDrP+0yKF0Ceygthk7ssvnhdXNUMAKndgklYFPAQSiLYD dLJDMXWJ0pKiStZp3iQOBY8Z1HPYrCeYuLi8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vBhGmPcyRBDQl1pC2ux+89erbbPAD6ofHyOWfThZ6k6dUPDXLjh/keXRFEipfpxDKQ 5NmLbUK6lVOeAokIlgbTFZhiiwqTd3bzNmH0xGOPxZqh0SrbUJS+f4SKWJ1sbe7XUG+N zCwmNborVXiKeOlgZOHU3iKaZszZBj/0ur5xs= Received: by 10.140.127.13 with SMTP id z13mr2832623rvc.145.1234083111075; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:51:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.70? (c-68-35-57-46.hsd1.nm.comcast.net [68.35.57.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm11351696rvb.2.2009.02.08.00.51.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:51:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <498E9D26.3090804@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:51:50 -0700 From: Tim Judd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr References: <20090206202032.GB76165@obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20090206202032.GB76165@obspm.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installkernel on small disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:51:51 -0000 Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > I've two servers (in fact guest in vmware) on don't have enought disk space > to make buildkernel (or world). > > For the world freebsd-update can work. But for the kernel I've my own > kernel. > > So if I compile the kernel on the other server how can I put it on the > first ? > > Regards. > > With an NFS mount, with sneakernet, or scp. On the machine with enough disk space: make buildkernel installkernel DESTDIR=/nfsmount KERNCONF=otherkernel #hackish and i'd be worried of this. It will force a backup of the running kernel to the remote /boot/kernel.old I'd recommend: make buildkernel installkernel DESTDIR=/tmp KERNCONF=otherkernel tar -czf /tmp/otherkernel.tgz /tmp/boot/kernel # bring the otherkernel.tgz file to the machine, maybe by usb stick, and extract. don't forget to tar -xz*p*f (permissions) How thin on disk space are you? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 09:03:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AD91065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27B48FC16 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl91-225.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.58.225]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n1893SS5019225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:03:33 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1893Rlw094316; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:03:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1893RFp094315; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:03:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tim Judd References: <139b44430902070752g17296e5cr6a910baa6c15386a@mail.gmail.com> <873aeqcjw5.fsf@kobe.laptop> <139b44430902070810n4215d90at777c824b94161a2d@mail.gmail.com> <498E9BC7.5010808@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:03:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <498E9BC7.5010808@gmail.com> (Tim Judd's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:45:59 -0700") Message-ID: <87ab8x2tcw.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: n1893SS5019225 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.871, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.53, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions , Valentin Bud Subject: Re: make installworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:03:36 -0000 On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:45:59 -0700, Tim Judd wrote: > I should make sure it's mentioned -- > FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD > world ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. > > I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ > statements were ignored. IIRC, src.conf works in _addition_ to make.conf so having options in either one should be safe I think. The advice of keeping options cleanly separated is very sound though, to avoid confusion when these two files have conflicting options :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 09:20:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A058106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD78FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so530029bwz.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:20:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hizVDSxRV/OFD8n9hMB4f/K9JJIhPx9n64L3OM7jaa4=; b=Rhprpxl/aj4zTOIrs0qe1UBGOLnCzhf5O144gjhRlx4cPc/zCGQimQ/mgcu8ysWFm+ Hha/P/HTXAMHQKzoXouQ5MeLc+tbQcJBmv5RYzs389mdeU14W1Qhgi5Takm9DWZvQmLP REY/VJRNwDZBqWwrirpdhm6+Gw53+s6fbibIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OmvpCZSJW24Azzjn2fF9swBKRF/k3PA3sRbEjruECWYQor+WKSmvMdJj+qqgOtGtbf exCyfPMhtxWByrNzAxn1Xk0OsbJyep7RiU3F43tiYXCDDFIVAl5hEL6YAptwCjL9OqEv 2SuFv0kgGVN3UBJFA35z7lG16MWZ5+io+OZxw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.106.200 with SMTP id y8mr1863978fao.24.1234084848794; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:20:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902071013j63815054u76c763ed63564103@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ad871310902071013j63815054u76c763ed63564103@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:20:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080120w16235c26wcf8d214291faf79a@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Amer Alhabsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile a network driver given source code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:20:50 -0000 On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Amer Alhabsi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have Benq Joybook R43 notebook. It has network interface based on SiS 191. >> However, I can't configure it as it does not show up in ifconfig nor in >> sysinstall/configure/networking/interfaces. Dmesg says: No Driver Attached. >> >> After some search I found that someone has written a driver but it >> hasn't been put int the official FreeBSD release. I want to try my >> luck with the driver. My question is where to place the source code >> files? and how to compile it (I assume it can be part of a kernel >> rebuild if placed in the right directory) >> >> The source code for the driver consists of the 3 files: if_sis19x.c, >> if_sis19xreg.h and Makefile. >> > > Edit the Makefile to match the standard installation directories that > FreeBSD uses (/usr/local), and use `make'. Depending on what the > drivers needs are, you may have to edit more. > Erm... I must've had a synaptic misfire. Not /usr/local, but /boot/modules. -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 09:26:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5725C106566C; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kennaway-macbookpro.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC948FC08; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <498EA55F.5020904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:26:55 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Omer Faruk Sen References: <75a268720902070000r7dbe758aq60454092fcab0198@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <75a268720902070000r7dbe758aq60454092fcab0198@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.3/7.1 and Linux disk performance test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:26:58 -0000 Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > as you can see there is a big difference in just simple dd test. Is > there additional steps that I can follow to increase performance? Use a benchmark that matches your actual workload, and then see how things look. I would be surprised if your target workload was "dd" :-) Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 09:48:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085051065674 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kennaway-macbookpro.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C858FC0A; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <498D87BD.3040305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:08:13 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Judd References: <1E37AE87F15C4E34B6EB1002AADEB87A@desktop2002> <498A7F31.30206@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <498A7F31.30206@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Yavuz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there any way to increase disk performance ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:48:38 -0000 Tim Judd wrote: > Yavuz wrote: >> I have freebsd7 (amd64 bit) and sata2 disk 7200 rpm. >> >> it's running mail server which has services like pop3,imap,smtp and >> webmail on this machine. >> >> When I type systat 1 -vmstat on command line, even I rarely see that >> disk usage hits 100%. >> I have no problem as ram and cpu. they is enough. >> >> is there any way to increase disk performance without causing any >> problem ? >> > > So in one second, the disk hits 100% utilization, weather it's reading > or writing data to disk. You said above that "I rarely see" -- so even > though, as a server, you're running slow spindles, you are doing pretty > good. > > I've no real experience with a site that's (for example) been > slashdotted, to test what is tolerable, and what's not. But as I > currently guess, an OVERALL average between 25% to 33% is about as much > as I would ever tax a server for CONSISTENT averages. > > So if you're seeing it rarely, such as when somebody hits webmail and > takes 1 second of constant disk read to serve the content, I'd be happy > there... > > I don't think you have a problem, when you put your concern into the > broader scope of 1 minute, 1 hour, 1 day or 1 week. It'll be very > difficult to never see 100% in 1 second no matter how powerful the > machine is. Make sure you understand that gstat's "%busy" column does not tell you how close to capacity your disk is, it tells you what % of time it is handling I/O. Since modern drives can have many commands queued at any given time, those are not the same thing. To understand whether your disk is overloaded, look at the ms/r and ms/w times. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 10:23:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDD9106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fam.vanderschaft@kpnplanet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml17.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml17.KPNXCHANGE.COM [213.75.38.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A867E8FC21 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fam.vanderschaft@kpnplanet.nl) Received: from cpsmtp-eml111.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.168.111]) by hpsmtp-eml17.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:11:30 +0100 Received: from dionysus ([86.94.74.244]) by cpsmtp-eml111.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:11:30 +0100 Message-ID: <09e601c989d6$0eb77300$0600080a@dionysus> From: "Familie van der Schaft" To: References: <4962AB3A.9030108@ccstores.com><20090106023104.GA24401@teddy.fas.com> <4962C2FE.8070006@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:14:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1933 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1933 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2009 10:11:30.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CA99A90:01C989D5] Cc: Glen Barber Subject: Re: 7.1 release / apache22 / php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:23:35 -0000 LS, I hav e the same problem with 7.0 release. The libphp5.so is placed by the php5 port. When you deinstall php5, make clean, make config (check apache module), make install,...the libphp5.so is placed in the libexec directory. Or with clean installation, first install apache22 then php5. Danny van der Schaft ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Barber" To: "Jim Pazarena" ; Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:33 AM Subject: Re: 7.1 release / apache22 / php5 > stan wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:52:10PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > > > >> for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains > >> that it cannot find libphp5.so > >> I usually compile php5 from ports > >> and apache22 from ports > >> after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.so anywhere. I > >> am not even sure who/what > >> causes php5 module to be added to /usr/local/libexec/apache22/libphp5.so > >> it's present on my 7.0 system, and missing on my 7.1 system. > >> advice would be much appreciated. > >> > > > > I don't know if it's a change, but on the 7.1 machine I just built. the > > lang/php5 port was not configured by default to build the Apache module. > > > > > It's been that way as far as I can remember (at least since 6.2-RELEASE). > > -- > Glen Barber > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1874 - Release Date: 4-1-2009 16:32 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 10:29:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E8F106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10948FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so751795fgb.35 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:29:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SQ/Rvfp4ZvkiHoPkyOkX+exksQKq3cJluqm23Abltn0=; b=fSupXK0TVcmfD9i4IdBhkDNxSH5AgXZWixK5etHE1IvZ+WvU7EZTQ6LNhTDXfYJXXC Jt7TuyHI/gcvrNJHYGOPJFbjqJH3jVeAaHFBbouPbpAmGQgpaYsyWEMgPeA64l4xe/jB V0lyAng5UWE7jihgbrj437j8wJ5F5RZOICOvc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BzAzl8Liu73j/cRy7NXJhZ2ch12UY0MMFgye3O0Q/WWzgP5kXCv/A5EDc1M0bbywpN rVDieLC4xz5Q7OavYU9Xa0470740yT0S+YhKYGnEcznBtVtwzVO+tfT5XM9yRtu0qgO2 MZVo1800wY5Tp7XBa+uNwsT1F9r9DK8HlxoH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.71.1 with SMTP id t1mr2082110fga.3.1234088988064; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:29:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <498E9BC7.5010808@gmail.com> References: <139b44430902070752g17296e5cr6a910baa6c15386a@mail.gmail.com> <873aeqcjw5.fsf@kobe.laptop> <139b44430902070810n4215d90at777c824b94161a2d@mail.gmail.com> <498E9BC7.5010808@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: <139b44430902080229m29348dd0k99f575dbf45a7f15@mail.gmail.com> From: Valentin Bud To: Tim Judd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: make installworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:29:49 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Tim Judd wrote: > Valentin Bud wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This are the parts from /etc/make.conf regarding system build options: >> # --- system build options >> WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes >> WITHOUT_IPX=yes >> WITHOUT_LPR=yes >> WITHOUT_RCMDS=yes >> WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes >> >> I didn't give any arguments to >> # make buildworld or >> # make installworld >> >> I have ran them as i've typed them above. >> >> Is there something wrong in /etc/make.conf ? >> > > > I should make sure it's mentioned -- > FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD world > ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. > > I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ > statements were ignored. Thanks for the heads up. I will start right away to move and "organize" these files. :) a great day, v > > > --Tim > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:08:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176831065675 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD3D8FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from [10.1.11.1] ([10.1.11.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n18Bqhpm017809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:52:44 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:12:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <332f78510902040635k6675a9b6u434879b42c66a579@mail.gmail.com> <498B8A7F.2060906@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <498B8A7F.2060906@onetel.com> X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(=?utf-8?q?HkaQ*=60!=3FYOK=3FY!=27M=60C=0A=09aP=5C9nVPF8Q=7DCilHH8l=3B=7E!4?= =?utf-8?q?2HK6=273lg4J=7Daz?=@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@ =?utf-8?q?k=230=0A=0954XDRg=3DYn=5FF-etwot4U=24b?=dTS{i X-Spam-Score: -4.192 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Subject: Re: shell commands - exclusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:08:39 -0000 On Friday 06 February 2009 02:55, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > I think you should be able to do it with a combination of -prune and > -delete (or -exec rm -rf {} \; ) on a find command. Substitute your > other commands for rm -rf in the -exec above. > > I would give you a working example except I can't figure out the syntax > for -prune. Examples from google don't seem to work in (my) FreeBSD. [skip to the end for a simple answer without the lengthy exposition] find(1) can be confusing, especially if you think of the ``actions'' ( -print, -exec and -delete plus their variants like -ls and -ok ) as something different from the ``tests'' ( -name and so on), or if you don't take account of the evaluation order. A find expression comprises a number of what the manpage calls primaries, each of which evaluates as true or false. (It may also have a side-effect, like -print whose side-effect is to print the name). Primaries can be combined with -and (which is usually implied) or -or. Where -and and -or both occur, find will group the -anded primaries together before evaluation. Taking one of your examples below, find . -print -or -prune -name dir1 this is grouped as find . -print -or \( -prune -and -name dir1 \) find will then evaluate the whole expression from left to right for each pathname in the tree it's looking at, stopping within each set of (implied) parentheses and within the overall expression as soon as it can determine truth or falsehood. (This is what's referred to in programming as short-circuiting in boolean expressions). If primaries are linked by -and, find can stop at the first one that's false, knowing the expression is false; if they're linked by -or it can stop at the first one that's true, knowing the expression is true. Otherwise it has to evaluate the whole expression. Before it does this, though, find checks for side-effects. If there isn't a side-effect anywhere in your expression, find will put brackets round the whole expression and a -print after it. Looking at your examples: > chrisw@pcbsd% find . (No expression). Find adds a -print, so this is the same as the next one: > chrisw@pcbsd% find . -print > . > ./test.mov > ./test.mpg > ./dir1 > ./dir1/file1 > ./dir1/file2 > ./file3 -print is always true so the expression is true for each name - they get printed as a side-effect. > chrisw@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune dir1 > find: dir1: unknown option -prune doesn't take an argument, so dir1 is a syntax error. > chrisw@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune -name dir1 find evaluates the print, which prints each name as its side-effect. -print evaluates as true. Since it's in an -or, find can stop there, so it never sees the second expression ( -prune -and -name dir1: the -and is implicit). > . > ./test.mov > ./test.mpg > ./dir1 > ./dir1/file1 > ./dir1/file2 > ./file3 > chrisw@pcbsd% find . -print -o -name dir1 -prune Same again: find stops after the -print which is always true, and ignores the -name dir1 -and -prune. > chrisw@pcbsd% find . -name "*" -o -name dir1 -prune None of these primaries has a side-effect, so find rewrites this internally as find . \( -name "*" -or -name dir1 -prune \) -print -name "*" is always true, so find can ignore everything after the -or up to the parenthesis. Because the first expression is true, and the parens are followed by (an implied) -and, find has to evaluate the -print, which is always true, so the whole expression is always true and it always prints the name as a side-effect. > . > ./test.mov > ./test.mpg > ./dir1 > ./dir1/file1 > ./dir1/file2 > ./file3 What you need is an expression with two outcomes: a -prune for some names and a -print for others. That tells you you need an -or, and the -print must come after it because it's always true. Before the -or, -prune is always true so you need some sort of testing primary before the -prune. That gives you find . -name dir1 -prune -or -print Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:10:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16E41065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (brucec-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:c09::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2C88FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7C19014; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:10:49 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on muon X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from gluon (tau.demon.co.uk [80.177.26.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:10:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:10:44 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20090208121044.5e3be1a3@gluon> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080120w16235c26wcf8d214291faf79a@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ad871310902071013j63815054u76c763ed63564103@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310902080120w16235c26wcf8d214291faf79a@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Amer Alhabsi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile a network driver given source code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:10:52 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:20:48 -0500 Glen Barber wrote: > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Glen Barber > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Amer Alhabsi > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have Benq Joybook R43 notebook. It has network interface based > >> on SiS 191. However, I can't configure it as it does not show up > >> in ifconfig nor in sysinstall/configure/networking/interfaces. > >> Dmesg says: No Driver Attached. > >> > >> After some search I found that someone has written a driver but it > >> hasn't been put int the official FreeBSD release. I want to try my > >> luck with the driver. My question is where to place the source code > >> files? and how to compile it (I assume it can be part of a kernel > >> rebuild if placed in the right directory) > >> > >> The source code for the driver consists of the 3 files: > >> if_sis19x.c, if_sis19xreg.h and Makefile. > >> > > > > Edit the Makefile to match the standard installation directories > > that FreeBSD uses (/usr/local), and use `make'. Depending on what > > the drivers needs are, you may have to edit more. > > > > Erm... I must've had a synaptic misfire. Not /usr/local, > but /boot/modules. /boot/modules doesn't seem to be used any more: modules are put into /boot/ which is /boot/kernel by default. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:13:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C65106567E for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926A38FC27 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so575151bwz.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:13:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vAfepIMf36aTImBmO7rC2Xnq/c7fRy9tEm1aXf7EgAk=; b=NjvjE6ZIaA/Nmv+kK/O/vgeMBCE4M0GAeBSu/Bm7MZKY8tlYHERV+Lokyy8S04gsFr 6SrCCkxzujQOpbbbxA+tXjFJeNpEeM+Besb1hkVXi1D00jhcSn2HGrMb0+aPcxcaGLQe okT/7iDvQ+d2akQxBbtpzD7UFzi/gADVHVilU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AQk37I58I9iVBCgoakYyQ7K7v6Vm/J2nKKktcTkNbKWNk+5DfYxN2Vl3l/sbnd5Mkb xPuIVOq7L6ZSRWCfVM5EfYoV40x2ZdvphAhPY6omO/0w2X4PW6AzKcRI+oWoajSfT0sP 3e8D8vyNraznkY9hKiTuLS0fBjd/RegdN0+Hw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.114.208 with SMTP id f16mr2745189faq.91.1234095225171; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:13:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090208121044.5e3be1a3@gluon> References: <4ad871310902071013j63815054u76c763ed63564103@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310902080120w16235c26wcf8d214291faf79a@mail.gmail.com> <20090208121044.5e3be1a3@gluon> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080413t1d228d48va9dfbd878d832816@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile a network driver given source code X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:13:47 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > /boot/modules doesn't seem to be used any more: modules are put > into /boot/ which is /boot/kernel by default. > /boot/modules is still used. My ndis0 driver is located in /boot/modules and loaded via /boot/loader.conf at startup. -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:31:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A3E106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A6A8FC1B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id C00A978D1A; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:31:24 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACE478C2B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:31:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:31:23 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:31:26 -0000 Hello. I use apache13 with FreeBSD 6.3. I have some websites, in : /var/www/sites/site1 /var/www/sites/site2 I use PHP 5 (compiled in apache module). The rights are: ls -ls /var/www/sites/site1: www:site1 All files are owned by www user. All files are grouped in site{1,2} group. I have a php script in /var/www/sites/site1. I call it with www.domain.com/test.php. If, in my php page, I create a folder (in /var/www/sites/site1/), it have www:site1 in rights. Ok, it's good. However, if I create a file, it have www:wheel in rights. What's the problem? Apache runs in www:www. I does not have folder grouped in wheel group. Why Apache set 'wheel' as group when I upload a file? Do you have advices, solutions... ? Thanks! -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:41:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7965E106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: from web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.85.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8D88FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: (qmail 13584 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2009 12:41:12 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: .TvCyEAVM1kkzQAON_RvYUJfGDtxn9nOkbQAHTk3sxVXxIxWXGzKPY4cRabAvMUwSmTffHrT3RyKM22z2raPaXbFEadVc7oX6MsqaTwW7P5CpbD1goD2.vgjP4b5iBGXa2VEBzlIx6LrZEd7AeGH7NszrnMTIuQwoPPA.yAOBXFBhmPpFXnCExPWHlP.Uw-- Received: from [69.43.143.59] by web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:41:11 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:41:11 -0800 (PST) From: Gabe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <71389.13229.qm@web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Subject: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nrml@att.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:41:13 -0000 Hello, I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config and I'm looking for the best RAID controllers that run under Freebsd. My entire goal with using RAID 0+1 is having redundancy while utilizing most of the disk space. I realize the potential problems with this setup, the failure of the OS disk and booting for one and also dealing with the possibility of two drives failing within the same set. I guess I can deal with that(?) Anyway, What controllers have you found work well for you on F*BSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:46:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A127106567A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3795F8FC19 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18CjtrN053699; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:45:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n18CjtKu053696; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:45:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:45:55 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Gabe In-Reply-To: <71389.13229.qm@web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090208134523.Y53651@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <71389.13229.qm@web83816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:46:10 -0000 > I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want to pay there are a lot of "hardware" solutions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 12:56:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449B0106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043478FC1B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 2D55C78FB5; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:56:24 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106DC78C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:56:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:56:24 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: Glen Barber Message-Id: <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:56:25 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:50:34 -0500 Glen Barber wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I use apache13 with FreeBSD 6.3. > > I have some websites, in : > > /var/www/sites/site1 > > /var/www/sites/site2 > > > > I use PHP 5 (compiled in apache module). > > > > The rights are: > > > > ls -ls /var/www/sites/site1: www:site1 > > > > All files are owned by www user. All files are grouped in site{1,2} group. > > > > I have a php script in /var/www/sites/site1. I call it with www.domain.com/test.php. If, in my php page, I create a folder (in /var/www/sites/site1/), it have www:site1 in rights. Ok, it's good. However, if I create a file, it have www:wheel in rights. > > > > What's the problem? > > > > Apache runs in www:www. I does not have folder grouped in wheel group. > > > > Why Apache set 'wheel' as group when I upload a file? > > > > Do you have advices, solutions... ? > > > > I haven't used 1.3 in years... I don't think www:www is proper, but I > may be wrong. With 2.2.X, the permissions are root:wheel. What > happens when you execute the page? What is printed the error log? Thanks for your response. I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine (6.3) it does not work. When I upload a FILE, the rights are root:wheel ; when I create a folder, the rights are www:site1. www:site1 are rights of all files. The problem is... I don't understand the "wheel". Apache does not run in wheel. All my folders/files are not grouped by "wheel". I don't understand WHY apache set 'wheel' in group... I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the rights...... -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:01:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C801065673 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA608FC19 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so587838bwz.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:01:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QbU5BbR7Fz1rjaRL1AXI3PhL2N7jC0ZtkGHHNfN3940=; b=SdYB9H/vby+BbiTb3x0TKZndh7NeebM6zIQGiOoS/gbl4rdbgApSVwdJTIr0Yo8nR9 oOTRyD+qnNBtywCTWYR/XVUvEDH/i3AzsvGDcwDHH481JJuplL0/BOQrkOaVq3YoeuVq Nw0dvQ/EA6As1DCtkclyFmdUMnVpr07tkRbVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UI4RHpNBlIsnT7HdHEUian+oDC0hjQZR35fVAXnsQBvau6jMdY/jUz2Tv2QqSsRW0U uOc3uhCxPeClB8arnF14eFRNPQhXjCcyemrMlO7p9K/Qzand0tP1SmwYpwGbVSdZXVxV LADvA9JA1/4pj+7gHXJl8VG9zCyZ8LKWwfoMI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.111.134 with SMTP id s6mr1432857fap.60.1234098073247; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:01:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:01:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Nicolas Letellier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:01:15 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine (6.3) it does not work. What do you mean it does not work. You state below there are no errors. If it "does not work" there should be errors. > The problem is... I don't understand the "wheel". Apache does not run in wheel. All my folders/files are not grouped by "wheel". 'wheel' is root's default group. > > I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the rights...... > But you say above "it does not work." -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:11:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31884106567A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E391C8FC18 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3653578FB5; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:11:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EB978C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:10:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:11:01 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: Glen Barber Message-Id: <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:11:01 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:01:13 -0500 Glen Barber wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine (6.3) it does not work. > > What do you mean it does not work. You state below there are no > errors. If it "does not work" there should be errors. It does not work because Apache don't set 'good rights'. Without error. So, for Apache, there are no errors. For me, yes. It is not normal that the rights are www:wheel. > > The problem is... I don't understand the "wheel". Apache does not run in wheel. All my folders/files are not grouped by "wheel". > > 'wheel' is root's default group. But it is not the www's default group. And Apache runs a www user. I *never* launch my scripts as root. So, that's why I don't understand. > > > > I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the rights...... > > > > But you say above "it does not work." It does not work because apache set www:wheel on rights when I UPLOAD a file ; on the other hand, when I create file/folder, the rights are www:www. When I launch this very simple script: ./aaa file is created with www:www. So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? And WHY wheel group is used? This group may never be used for Apache. -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:29:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA3F1065676 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD838FC16 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so770520fgb.35 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:29:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=doFrQWQ8awj1ndxSJRhlJDkL3bt8Se/grh3tQh32Wlc=; b=kgaADKE4WVpFRvC7w09EHIU3mroQC+NtNCxgef96TUlENM0zHKwlHvHh2RD8znWofJ 91Yez+H4F1QFKWMaZT2b0H8V92Qn8cxOWisIj5INjjOiUU8yx8n3WLKbuwwVd8hHrocY O0cNMyTQ4HpTgnxsid58NulIrv4NDv192e8lg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=d4pgVvc2ztGUJ+xxw223NABxqFwLtQz/4ctqYdRCJ++4mNOiM72BUNA43zFDZx3sZS /peGJCgla0k1HMvXm0LVIYOZup+5Te5vHtSXdnCwpnLz1NLAbMdwRX7k5SDXU0cVWw+j 8qJP/dEE7JjzaHETuEsbYw9a02AxCRxAuanvE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.72.15 with SMTP id u15mr1150591fga.8.1234099761848; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:29:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090207155913.M50096@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <75a268720902070356v51fa601cy98889f272d724555@mail.gmail.com> <20090207155913.M50096@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:29:21 +0000 Message-ID: From: Freminlins To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Omer Faruk Sen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10gb network interface suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:29:23 -0000 2009/2/7 Wojciech Puchar > But also I am open to other brands. Especially If anyone has >> experience on that this matter would be very very helpful. I have seen >> that Sun has quad 10gbE adapters: >> http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/10gigethernet/index.xml >> I am not sure if FreeBSD supports that? >> > > could you please explain ANY CASE when 4*10GbE/s could be utilized. > > it's 5 GIGABYTES/s each direction. computer memory subsystem is rarely > faster > To be fair, the adaptor on the link is a dual port device (I looked with interest!), and Sun states the maximum is 16Gb/s aggregrate. A machine that is multi homed on 10G networks could use all ports. It doesn't mean it has to do 10G of traffic all the time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:29:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E781F106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C6D8FC18 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (213-84-73-82.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n18DJIvt025644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:19:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18DJHIV016883 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:19:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:19:17 +0100 From: Marco Beishuizen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090208141917.22d443c7@yokozuna.lan> In-Reply-To: <498E28DF.1060003@gmail.com> References: <20090208011726.13ef1a93@yokozuna.lan> <498E28DF.1060003@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:29:25 -0000 On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote: > Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4? Yes, xorg was updated some days ago. I upgraded OO yesterday. -- The only thing better than love is milk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:54:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B72106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8564C8FC0A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4932 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2009 13:54:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Feb 2009 13:54:04 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34B95084B; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7AD5C1CEA8; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 (EST) To: Nicolas Letellier References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> (Nicolas Letellier's message of "Sun\, 8 Feb 2009 14\:11\:01 +0100") Message-ID: <44y6whyqyw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Glen Barber , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:54:04 -0000 Nicolas Letellier writes: > So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 13:57:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB0F106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: from web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.85.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC638FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: (qmail 94977 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2009 13:57:34 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: GzRq.MEVM1mY25PW73fH7Va8RC3D24RdOPxPmDnXo2M9_9pZwA3Mo3qV Received: from [69.43.143.59] by web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:57:33 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:57:33 -0800 (PST) From: Gabe To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20090208134523.Y53651@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <30768.94964.qm@web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nrml@att.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:57:34 -0000 --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > From: Wojciech Puchar > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers > To: "Gabe" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 4:45 AM > > I have to build a file server that will need to run a > RAID 0+1 config > > the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want > to pay there are a lot of "hardware" solutions. > _______________________________________________ Hey I'm all for saving money, but I'm unsure of the reliability of a 'software' solution vs a hardware one. Not to mention my biggest concern which is the failure of the Boot drive and how to recover from that using software raid. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:02:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F2010656D9 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015E18FC0C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id A222D78FB5; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:02:36 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F6178C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:02:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:02:37 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <44y6whyqyw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <44y6whyqyw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glen Barber , Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:02:38 -0000 On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Nicolas Letellier writes: > > > So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? > > I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the > directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid > of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned > by the group you want the files to have. That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel ........ I don't understand. I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find the solution................ -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:09:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782F106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f14.google.com (mail-fx0-f14.google.com [209.85.220.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6507D8FC13 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so488859fxm.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lmWJWLTLW0k9i7ez40Omki5qEnZNTX8wtUgSNV3GqsM=; b=us3SOeTjy88EBI632bd5b4keF0e42VglnPKe9vePCDHWBckh/5w6HDoznTM+tgriE0 +kodJH2r6cGXKwLTVl8Hjc6pOCYByG9l/s4TOzrjK112+jM++mSF8lZQWMiDihmCBoqm /cTKXLBbCJQZDc33kLlY+w0cFvau9KairSOUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N1jNK43pki5Vo4WYbCYz3LfH4ZjC84Tj7/KJMhVgto4lBBxPPT/mKFBc/CDuv7SkPf c/5kmt8bUcihr4yO5ZTKu7chzZQCC/JSZVASTksJobREV3nUsLY8f0YjHMT8WsaVQCrs KQgHTFGYq1fEIWGWYsKs5cgNWsxmzUd99INjU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.115.12 with SMTP id g12mr584558faq.92.1234102185921; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <44y6whyqyw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:09:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080609h4e2326ddn41cd9c475406bb7f@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Nicolas Letellier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:09:48 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. > I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www rights. > > And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel > What are the permissions on the file you are uploading? -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:11:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44245106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: from web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.85.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 169A48FC13 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: (qmail 67014 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2009 14:11:27 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 6_bkNqwVM1l7b7mdg3d2XSwkIWchmPRYe2gAHiDW6w85fODdxG340z6Ch62s6TATV6mMs4xYH__lD72D1ylGNifviYR1rMTHbxgD2Ke7OlIKamFF5Af1fW6qeaE9WnU3qcoGwFRv9cyiS5J88_9owmpK6Wk.M7.T8YNnnqAQBlHB5GEVzG2DoAmeMeeUsqLwx8L1pwHIK9ZOlhuW_fO.6QxtOMps Received: from [69.43.143.59] by web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:11:27 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: Gabe To: FreeBSD Questions , Nicolas Letellier In-Reply-To: <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <880806.66622.qm@web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nrml@att.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:11:28 -0000 --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > From: Nicolas Letellier > Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > Cc: "Glen Barber" , "Lowell Gilbert" > Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM > On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 > Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > > > Nicolas Letellier writes: > > > > > So, anybody could explain me when I upload a > file, rights are www:wheel? > > > > I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting > the group from the > > directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to > get the gid > > of the directory. The directory you are uploading > into should be owned > > by the group you want the files to have. > > That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not > true. > I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www > rights. > > And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel > > ........ > > I don't understand. > I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find > the solution................ > -- > -Nicolas. 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:14:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E2A106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411638FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 5E4BC78FB5; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:14:03 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7A478C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:14:04 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: nrml@att.net Message-Id: <20090208151404.e8b35f0c.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <880806.66622.qm@web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <880806.66622.qm@web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:14:04 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) Gabe wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > > From: Nicolas Letellier > > Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache > > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > > Cc: "Glen Barber" , "Lowell Gilbert" > > Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM > > On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 > > Lowell Gilbert > > wrote: > > > > > Nicolas Letellier writes: > > > > > > > So, anybody could explain me when I upload a > > file, rights are www:wheel? > > > > > > I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting > > the group from the > > > directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to > > get the gid > > > of the directory. The directory you are uploading > > into should be owned > > > by the group you want the files to have. > > > > That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not > > true. > > I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www > > rights. > > > > And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel > > > > ........ > > > > I don't understand. > > I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find > > the solution................ > > -- > > -Nicolas. > > 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? No, www is not a member of wheel group. -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:16:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC351065677 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE4F8FC29 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id C6F8879019; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:16:51 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD72978C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:16:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:16:52 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: Glen Barber Message-Id: <20090208151652.ff6fad3f.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080609h4e2326ddn41cd9c475406bb7f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090208133123.401c8d1a.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080450r39b89f85uc1668657f55ee4d6@mail.gmail.com> <20090208135624.72f60572.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080501y7bcfc7ev202aa5e81f5b2050@mail.gmail.com> <20090208141101.1c18bbc8.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <44y6whyqyw.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <4ad871310902080609h4e2326ddn41cd9c475406bb7f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:16:53 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:09:45 -0500 Glen Barber wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > > > That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. > > I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www rights. > > > > And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel > > > > What are the permissions on the file you are uploading? I'm uploading the file from a web client. This is a php script. I have another FreeBSD (7.0), with the SAME apache, and I don't have the problem on it. Files uploaded are www:www (normal). On my machine (6.3), with the SAME apache, files uploaded are www:wheel. I set the *same* php script, I send the same file. I'm looking for differences between them, but none. -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:24:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826CD106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471C18FC0A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2009 09:24:28 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18830.60186.503830.919832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:24:26 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: LOR listing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:24:30 -0000 There was at one time a list of lock order reversals, presumably at http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html I am unable to connect to that address. Has the address changed, or is the site experiencing problems? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:33:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69D71065673 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BCE8FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id DE99978F51; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:33:12 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C671E78C82; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:33:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:33:13 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: nrml@att.net Message-Id: <20090208153313.ffdac3f9.nicolas@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <880806.66622.qm@web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <20090208150237.deaf37df.nicolas@nicoelro.net> <880806.66622.qm@web83814.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:33:14 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) Gabe wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > > From: Nicolas Letellier > > Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache > > To: "FreeBSD Questions" > > Cc: "Glen Barber" , "Lowell Gilbert" > > Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM > > On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 > > Lowell Gilbert > > wrote: > > > > > Nicolas Letellier writes: > > > > > > > So, anybody could explain me when I upload a > > file, rights are www:wheel? > > > > > > I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting > > the group from the > > > directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to > > get the gid > > > of the directory. The directory you are uploading > > into should be owned > > > by the group you want the files to have. > > > > That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not > > true. > > I upload into "testdir/" which has www:www > > rights. > > > > And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel > > > > ........ > > > > I don't understand. > > I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find > > the solution................ > > -- > > -Nicolas. > > 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? Ok, I found! Yeah. We must set a upload_tmp_dir (instead the default upload_dir). And this folder must have your rights. By default, this folder has root:wheel (in 1777 mod). So, when Apache copies uploaded files from this folder, it keep the wheel group. Hope this tip could help others persons. Thanks for your time and your advices. Regards, -- -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:39:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E607106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:0:6:209:87:239:66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546368FC21 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from anton.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n18CuXiM016369 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:56:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by anton.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40906860097; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:56:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:56:27 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M/SuVGWktc5uNpra" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:39:30 -0000 --M/SuVGWktc5uNpra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm having this with several perl modules while running a portupgrade -a.= =20 =3D=3D=3D> p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Tie-IxHash without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Tie-IxHash. *** Error code 1 I thought that portupgrade would take the right action to uninstall/reinsta= ll if required. I mean, it upgrades ports, right? :) Some guidance would be appreciated. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --M/SuVGWktc5uNpra Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJjtZ6KGqCc1vIvggRAqZOAJ9IL0oUQR2GeSUH+VTgQd4YOH4HLQCffogm M92O32xdMZNcKdOUcMXHcaw= =Kzh8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M/SuVGWktc5uNpra-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:59:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9716D1065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f14.google.com (mail-fx0-f14.google.com [209.85.220.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ED48FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so503063fxm.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:59:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IIcbWC15Jw9/v1Pn5zEQswjr46PbBovayPgO2DyGy28=; b=sdV+ljmBF3Q3qTyVp7wV9tE6/TMT9DAZU5uF3o7p2jm5iZtssvwT6OXv6cG8YVtwb6 FRGJM8aC7iCzgjB7td2JfjTmdlesv6ISJW2lz21CfSZFZXv1S+8foDqNdX47Gi3Dlv1W DjKBgfbCWBDn1bVjuDwcLOzhkEvCNkPX5ffgY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fWgV8Hmq2Zm5Ag4fJ0C5zmDlvEzfzTVKZ9dwW6Ef5G/UqgRqQYTbeuX+3DLrNv7svs Sr3nfdNA5LaTcAde4A57aYIQzJgdjp/En3DI0BmbnW5wsqQG8+d2rjULidpBpfrPRZMc 4jHqSlOje4+Y9eg3UmwkWw4kd6tQ9UqpPsKzk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.136 with SMTP id a8mr111473faq.76.1234105174190; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:59:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:59:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:59:35 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > I'm having this with several perl modules while running a portupgrade -a. > > ===> p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Tie-IxHash > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Tie-IxHash. > *** Error code 1 > Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 15:57:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD97106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:0:6:209:87:239:66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6372B8FC1E for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from anton.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n18Fv9qa022546; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:57:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by anton.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7891B860097; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:57:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:57:04 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20090208155703.GI10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Glen Barber , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qf1oXS95uex85X0R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:57:16 -0000 --Qf1oXS95uex85X0R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: > Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? Here's an example. msoulier@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall Password: =3D=3D=3D> Deinstalling for textproc/p5-XML-RSS =3D=3D=3D> Deinstalling p5-XML-RSS-1.37 pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/XML/RSS' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) msoulier@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make install distclean =3D=3D=3D> p5-XML-RSS-1.43 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm - not found =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser =3D=3D=3D> Installing for p5-XML-Parser-2.36 =3D=3D=3D> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 -= found =3D=3D=3D> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found =3D=3D=3D> Generating temporary packing list =3D=3D=3D> Checking if textproc/p5-XML-Parser already installed =3D=3D=3D> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/p5-XML-Parser without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-RSS. So now what?=20 Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --Qf1oXS95uex85X0R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJjwDPKGqCc1vIvggRAoX/AJwL1YR9vsifjLiKLy9y3cIwLlKmHACfZFnc 7eh4nF/4RqpxNKSTZHMicA4= =YHde -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qf1oXS95uex85X0R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 15:58:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDF41065672 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE678FC18 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-52-176.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.52.176]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3613CC1F; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n18Fwh1t001470; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Robert Huff Message-Id: <20090208165843.ca4e9aa4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <18830.60186.503830.919832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <18830.60186.503830.919832@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR listing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:58:58 -0000 On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:24:26 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > There was at one time a list of lock order reversals, > presumably at > > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html > > I am unable to connect to that address. Has the address > changed, or is the site experiencing problems? While host, ping and traceroute work fine on the server you specified, there seems to be no HTTP response. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 16:01:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1552210656BC for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A768FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so661329bwz.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:01:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=06TGRmm2Vf+xUhLm7lAK6ujSEQGu8M7BW9pu1nbYdI4=; b=tofo3SXhNc9F8HeImgbOQTqmtGmozmlRX3+M0ZLhNVmpJlRBqzcmsZQxWc3nf9Eli/ 9DcT2IYftAvl3vWtzboRilEufRlZ88xJgMkzS15Do2o3WhrZOC0539l0ruYfvtuno/eh poGwAnw59D1fTu4GuzZXtQupJuamthbSQdju4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VUVG5BLuEdS38/nJiNf+XrQJNXtkYHfKtrkec5v450rWLb8a9+3GqfoXoNkq0o60+p CLqI1zusUMkLIUd/S7gJ9pJRP+TljLCpBPccA1vmU/CU58e+pwxiosOd7xFtlJU03jak bBCXqiU6RLeIhqfib1vVHshR+woT/sZVoDa94= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.112.202 with SMTP id x10mr1209092fap.68.1234108867309; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:01:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090208155703.GI10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> References: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> <20090208155703.GI10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:01:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad871310902080801w6e51e863md21e38fe5bf7a6db@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:01:09 -0000 On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: > >> Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? > > Here's an example. > > msoulier@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall > Password: > ===> Deinstalling for textproc/p5-XML-RSS > ===> Deinstalling p5-XML-RSS-1.37 > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/XML/RSS' > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is > incorrectly specified?) > msoulier@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make install distclean > ===> p5-XML-RSS-1.43 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm - not found > ===> Verifying install for > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm in > /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser > ===> Installing for p5-XML-Parser-2.36 > ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 - found > ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if textproc/p5-XML-Parser already installed > ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.36 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/p5-XML-Parser > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-RSS. > > So now what? > Have you rebuilt all perl-dependent ports as the 20090113 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING mentions? (Also, please take my email address out of your Reply-To entry in your client.) -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 16:02:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C2C1065743 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:0:6:209:87:239:66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4938FC18 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from anton.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n18FsPoS022435; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:54:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by anton.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99BAC860097; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:54:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:54:20 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20090208155419.GH10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Glen Barber , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:02:02 -0000 --w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: > Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl modules that resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled. Following those dependencies resulted in the same, and so on... I have no hair left to pull out, or it would be gone. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJjwArKGqCc1vIvggRAoY3AJoDFKsjCW/4ff9ia5EFsCIA+81FWwCfeb2j +TSINKBOYv8a++G6FErfZrY= =5iMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w3uUfsyyY1Pqa/ej-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 16:16:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06121065672 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f14.google.com (mail-fx0-f14.google.com [209.85.220.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAFE8FC13 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidcollins001@gmail.com) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so527583fxm.19 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:16:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UqWxW1WNQIGG1AATL6wUws/+6eH2O2ffXmIMb5BPMgc=; b=pZpB8ZU8LfwHB9kBBKy9hONvpQIt03swYXOQ8x6/En+Nm/mMuGOfaljrpys8/+mEmQ e9D1VKeLZxgDODapAVNtUFxkOZyuO5B2/UC6utgrf/in+WT0CXoV53luerLBz2mt0j/c RQaM4QjWZ3/Eqcy6QGK5jC6qUqvYFVgEHZOew= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sVtAJbqhuFwtd1XEZkBKULK1Pi4zfj+mZC6+EETICbZF7D5spkQOhpl+XcyOpiWQ0A 7yxIgS1sS8ySvlS7O2JTrDzjuLIl/v34Cl77yt/igBYlfA4cHZ2Tsxr0GiyADRQ8/WwK BVPTESEuJqY2W5M2s6Av75n57V6DmW9EuQnE4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.110.211 with SMTP id o19mr162622fap.57.1234109813679; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:16:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090207075521.GA93084@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <1b30fd140902050032x20e84ef6oc5030c99e6a62d81@mail.gmail.com> <498ABACC.3060102@bsdforen.de> <1b30fd140902050218m1660ad97ife6b0a679d8a946a@mail.gmail.com> <20090207075521.GA93084@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:16:53 +0000 Message-ID: <1b30fd140902080816v7dfb8bb6g6f3c9a3d162f48c0@mail.gmail.com> From: David Collins To: Frank Shute , Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: broken ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidcollins001@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:16:55 -0000 > How did you uninstall that port after which everything fails at the > configure stage? Which port was it? It was rtorrent that I uninstalled, I used "make deinstall" > Check a couple of things: > > $ which c++ > > and: > > $ locate gcc_s | grep lib viper:~$ which c++ /usr/bin/c++ also viper:~$ which gcc /usr/bin/gcc viper:~$ which cc /usr/bin/cc viper:~$ locate gcc_s | grep lib |more /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so.1 > Have you installed/uninstalled a c/c++ compiler from ports? I don't think that I have I haven't installed/uninstalled a compiler from ports unless one of the ports did it, and I doubt this is the case. David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 16:43:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0037106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90AB8FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id DSJJ1b00F0x6nqcA9UjJz5; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:43:18 +0000 Received: from FreeBSD.UNIXMuse.goreBSD.org ([76.112.93.25]) by OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id DUjH1b0010Yq9Sc8YUjH5G; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: <498F0BA0.1010603@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:43:12 -0500 From: Akenner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <498DD2DE.803@comcast.net> <498DD48C.6040409@comcast.net> <20090207232538.463917f5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090207232538.463917f5.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Playing audio CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:43:18 -0000 *snipped for polite cleanliness* Thanks to everyone who took the time to help me out here. I think instead of playing CDs I'll just rip them, it seems a WHOLE lot easier, and of course, not having to worry about scratches is a plus ;) I think one MAJOR problem I had yesterday when I was doing all this, was that I had been awake for about 27 hours...Which is more than most Windows boxes. I was trying to remember how to configure hardware because I'm basically spoiled by easy to configure OSs like BSD and Linux, that I literally couldn't remember how to configure stuff. I think you guys can agree to that. Back in like 2000 even, which wasn't THAT long ago, I know for a fact Windows and Linux were both very different, and this was....FreeBSD 4.0? 2000 is a little spacial, it's when I bought my very first FreeBSD PowerPak with FreeBSD 4.0 on CD, the 6 CD set of tools and things, and came with The Complete FreeBSD 3rd edition. Which I still read. Lehey is a great book writer. I think one problem also, is the sheer number of albums I have. I ahve a LOT of CDs, and almost all of them currently have been ripped, and I keep two HDs in my Slackware FTP server (Which may be reinstalled with FreeBSD, which is one reason I was testing how I'd do certain things in BSD) and I have over 30 GBs of music in there. Some albums that are important to me, like my Misfits boxed set, Ramones Discography, and rare Acid Bath Demo stuff, and my complete set of Danzig work (All Misfits, Samhain boxed set, + all Danzig CDs) I have all ripped as both oggVorbis, 128 K MP3s, and 320 K MP3s (I use 128 for my I-Pod because I have a 1 GB model, can't afford the big ones) and 320 I use for my play lists on the computer so I get good sound, and oggorbis was because a while back Linux distros like SUSE couldn't give you MP3 from out of the box, because of the license thing, so I kept ogg for that. It's something that took a LONG time to do and I'll probably just continue on with ripping the rest of my CD collection and putting it all on my FTP server so that each machine I have can play music without all of them losing disk space. Thanks again everyone! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 17:29:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D62106564A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C383C8FC18 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id DTJm1b00a0vp7WLA5VV10f; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:29:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([76.102.24.75]) by OMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id DVUz1b00M1dCpWs8RVUzb9; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:29:00 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:28:57 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20090208172857.GA13152@bsd.remdog.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: gtkpod permissions problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:29:01 -0000 I have installed gtkpod for use with my Nano, but I'm having a problem when trying to add files. The Nano is mounted at /mnt/ipod, and when I try to add a file I get a message similar to this: Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing (Permission denied). The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem, but I can't figure out its cause. TIA, ---Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 18:57:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE2D106566C for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355028FC17 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 27020 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2009 18:57:08 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Feb 2009 18:57:08 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6F45084A for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:57:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6BE951CEAB; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:57:05 -0500 (EST) To: FreeBSD References: <20090208172857.GA13152@bsd.remdog.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:57:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090208172857.GA13152@bsd.remdog.net> (Rem P. Roberti's message of "Sun\, 8 Feb 2009 09\:28\:57 -0800") Message-ID: <448wogaha6.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: gtkpod permissions problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:57:09 -0000 Rem P Roberti writes: > I have installed gtkpod for use with my Nano, but I'm having a problem > when trying to add files. The Nano is mounted at /mnt/ipod, and when I > try to add a file I get a message similar to this: > > Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening > '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing > (Permission denied). > > The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be > written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem, > but I can't figure out its cause. Look at the permissions on that file, and the directory containing it, and the mount point. I'm sure at least one of them isn't sufficiently permitted to the user running gtkpod. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 19:55:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EA5106567F for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B408FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18JtPAQ003612; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:55:27 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n18JtPAQ003612 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1234122927; bh=voKXWurqGNXnVNVwn/epTQ8d5URECGgNqfutKeWqg3M=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<498F38A7.8000602@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2008=20Feb=202009=2019:55:19=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.19=20(X11/20090125)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20nrml@att.net|CC:=20Wojciech=20Puchar=20,=20=0D=0A=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|S ubject:=20Re:=20FreeBSD=20Preferred=20RAID=20controllers|Reference s:=20<30768.94964.qm@web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>|In-Reply-To:=20< 30768.94964.qm@web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=20 0.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3 B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20bounda ry=3D"------------enig7A7F21A992EE6BBE6FBD32BA"; b=JDbfdZfbyybUZT5VpozY6F07G8XWEXTwW4YkEdc/qLaw05FvRhmDqhxWsI1/C7qJJ IPkzUaM+MCQgSN8RkdLzXPiAbLNL2iT71uTHDKvtVhOPZjGrrG6gltyQBCzQtZjA9y EyGmajb9aO6+Kimb31mS4gIsO+T24dVLpAuDzFdc= Message-ID: <498F38A7.8000602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:55:19 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nrml@att.net References: <30768.94964.qm@web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <30768.94964.qm@web83808.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7A7F21A992EE6BBE6FBD32BA" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:55:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8965/Sun Feb 8 14:42:44 2009 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:55:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7A7F21A992EE6BBE6FBD32BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gabe wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Wojciech Puchar wr= ote: >=20 >> From: Wojciech Puchar >>> I have to build a file server that will need to run a >> RAID 0+1 config If you want reliability, then use RAID10, not RAID0+1. For RAID10, you first create mirrored pairs of drives, then you stripe across all the mirrors. This is superior to RAID0+1 where you divide your drives into two equal pools, create a stripe across all the drives in each pool, and then mirror the stripes. Raw to usable space ratio is the same, performance characteristics are similar and good either way (some workloads, particularly those involving lots of small random IOs are particularly favourable on RAID10 (eg like the usage pattern of most RDBMses) whereas sequentially streaming large single files is happiest on RAID0+1 (eg. recording or playing video streams)). However imagine a RAID consisting of 2N drives. If one drive fails, then in RAID10, *one* of your N mirrors is degraded, and the rest work normally. In RAID0+1, it's one of the 2 *stripes* that is degraded -- effectively taking out half of your drives. Or to put it another way: given one drive has already died and the RAID is degraded, in either scenario, just one more disk death can take the RAID out completely. However with RAID10 there's exactly 1 drive whose death could have that effect -- failure of any of the other 2N-2 drives will degrade the RAID further, but it will still keep working. With RAID0+1 if the second disk to fail is any of the N drives from the other stripe, it will kill the whole RAID array. >> the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want >> to pay there are a lot of "hardware" solutions. > Hey I'm all for saving money, but I'm unsure of the reliability of a > 'software' solution vs a hardware one. Not to mention my biggest > concern which is the failure of the Boot drive and how to recover > from that using software raid. Software striping and mirroring is extremely reliable -- probably more so than using a hardware RAID card as there's simply less to go wrong. On the other hand hardware RAID offers some big performance advantages by being able to cache data in battery backed RAM[*] on the card, instead= of requiring you to wait until it's been written to persistent storage on= the drives themselves.=20 While you can certaily boot from a gmirror RAID1, I don't believe it's possible to boot from a gstripe -- but because this all works via the geom framework, you can create stripes / mirrors at the filesystem level -- so you can have a small separate RAID1 to boot from and to hold the OS (either a dedicated pair of disks, or a pair of equal sized partitions= , and then create a RAID10 over the rest of the disks to hold your data. I believe there is no requirement for the component parts of a gstripe to all be the same size=20 Cheers, Matthew [*] For mirroring and striping, the only real justification for using hardware RAID is the performance benefit from the Battery Backup Unit on the RAID card. For RAID5 while a BBU is a *really good idea* it can justify itself by offloading parity calculations from the main CPU. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7A7F21A992EE6BBE6FBD32BA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkmPOK0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxW/wCfUMWndXwQl202b2IdG6ivl8BG 9AoAn2lH52/lhlQw4sONeQaLH+i/5FIr =wcPR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7A7F21A992EE6BBE6FBD32BA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 20:36:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB911065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF3D8FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWGNk-0006CK-JN; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:36:00 +0000 Received: from melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id n18KZx3j006316; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:35:59 GMT Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D3788FCA4DB; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:35:53 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:35:53 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: David Collins Message-ID: <20090208203553.GA99661@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: David Collins , Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1b30fd140902050032x20e84ef6oc5030c99e6a62d81@mail.gmail.com> <498ABACC.3060102@bsdforen.de> <1b30fd140902050218m1660ad97ife6b0a679d8a946a@mail.gmail.com> <20090207075521.GA93084@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> <1b30fd140902080816v7dfb8bb6g6f3c9a3d162f48c0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1b30fd140902080816v7dfb8bb6g6f3c9a3d162f48c0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p2 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.1.7 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:36:00 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:36:06 -0000 On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:16:53PM +0000, David Collins wrote: > > > How did you uninstall that port after which everything fails at the > > configure stage? Which port was it? > > It was rtorrent that I uninstalled, I used "make deinstall" > > > > > Check a couple of things: > > > > $ which c++ > > > > and: > > > > $ locate gcc_s | grep lib > > viper:~$ which c++ > /usr/bin/c++ > > also > viper:~$ which gcc > /usr/bin/gcc > viper:~$ which cc > /usr/bin/cc > > > viper:~$ locate gcc_s | grep lib |more > /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so > /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so > /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so.1 > > > > Have you installed/uninstalled a c/c++ compiler from ports? > > I don't think that I have I haven't installed/uninstalled a compiler > from ports unless one of the ports did it, and I doubt this is the > case. > That all seems to be in order. I'm wondering whether your use of sudo is mucking things up and it's a permissions problem. i.e: it's running make OK but freaking out when it tries to invoke the compiler in the config stuff. I always build my ports using portupgrade as root. Maybe you could try logging in as root & then running it. If you'd rather not do that, portupgrade has got an -s switch which allows you to run the commands via sudo but you'd probably have to put cc & c++ in your sudoers (aswell as other commands e.g: install(1)). Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 20:53:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A861065670 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andres_heredia_17@hotmail.com) Received: from col0-omc4-s4.col0.hotmail.com (col0-omc4-s4.col0.hotmail.com [65.55.34.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70A38FC16 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andres_heredia_17@hotmail.com) Received: from COL115-W64 ([65.55.34.200]) by col0-omc4-s4.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:41:13 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [84.125.89.66] From: andres heredia To: Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:41:13 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2009 20:41:13.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[94E81950:01C98A2D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: andalusia grandfather retired grandfather unix, which is a scam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:53:14 -0000 because we are going to fuck you with your frebsd including unix?=20 I do not care who is better in fact I've managed and I advanced on unix / = linux / windows=20 or does not bear the gnu Haig was separately giving you even a unix incapi= e=2C for his gamble of free software=20 (It's a good way to give new things=2C this includes retired old glories a= s unix=2C)=20 asi junilas and grandparents uetro unix is part of the past=20 porque nos os vais al carajo con vuestro frebsd incluido unix?? me da igual que sea mejor de hecho lo he manejado y tengo conocimientos av= anzados sobre unix/linux/ windows o es que no soportais que la gnu se os haiga separado dandole incluso el in= capie a unix=2C por su apuesta de la libertad de software ( es buena dar paso a la nuevas cosas =2Ceso incluye jubilar viejas glorias= como unix=2C ) asi junilas ya abuelos uetro unix es parte del pasado parce que nous allons vas te faire encule avec votre frebsd notamment unix?= =20 Je ne suis pas de soins qui est mieux=2C en fait=2C j'ai r=E9ussi et j'ai = progress=E9 sur unix / linux / windows=20 ou ne porte pas le gnu Haig s=E9par=E9ment en vous donnant m=EAme un unix = incapie=2C pour son pari du logiciel libre=20 (C'est une bonne fa=E7on de donner de nouvelles choses=2C ce qui inclut le= s retrait=E9s anciens gloires comme unix)=2C=20 asi junilas et grands uetro unix fait partie du pass=E9 da wir ficken Sie mit Ihrem frebsd einschlie=DFlich unix?=20 Ich weiss nicht=2C wer besser ist in der Tat habe ich geschafft und ich er= weiterte auf UNIX / Linux / Windows=20 oder nicht mit der GNU Haig wurde getrennt=2C die Sie selbst ein Unix-inca= pie=2C f=FCr seine Gamble von freier Software=20 (Es ist ein guter Weg=2C um neue Dinge=2C dazu geh=F6rt auch Rentner alte = Herrlichkeiten wie Unix=2C)=20 asi junilas und Gro=DFeltern uetro Unix ist ein Teil der Vergangenheit _________________________________________________________________ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Space= s. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=3Dcreate&wx_url=3D/friends.= aspx&mkt=3Den-us= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 21:14:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBFE106566B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21518FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n18LDu9N004507; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:13:57 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n18LDu9N004507 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1234127637; bh=U2TV0ZZbklUqmVCIF13IB1/xge/+9o1nmk9z8OnOrjU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<498F4B0E.90705@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Sun ,=2008=20Feb=202009=2021:13:50=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20 |Organization:=20Infracaninophile |User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.19=20(X11/20090125)|MIME-Versio n:=201.0|To:=20Glen=20Barber=20,=20freebs d-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20portupgrade=20failing=20o n=20perl=20modules|References:=20<20090208125626.GG10866@anton.dig italtorque.ca>=09<4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail .gmail.com>=20<20090208155419.GH10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca>|In-R eply-To:=20<20090208155419.GH10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca>|X-Enigm ail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg =3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B =0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigFBE68266702B9147C0BDDB80"; b=H05IH1H62ssHZC6vTPNwm/WBXXzNYf40ZiXvPsg3iT9hI16GJo4Sr7GxfuFLdFi+1 3S5to98JwpC3ilFGgO5O9ITUC+WwfOVGJtqYlN44w6cHMm0DOPyhuHqofn40zMvhUF Tk88yTD0Su5lGoXHN3kBABw4Xm8MEQyJCSbe7xBg= Message-ID: <498F4B0E.90705@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:13:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090208125626.GG10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> <4ad871310902080659t76a7ed55w8e8f1589e8b1bf7@mail.gmail.com> <20090208155419.GH10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20090208155419.GH10866@anton.digitaltorque.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFBE68266702B9147C0BDDB80" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:13:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8965/Sun Feb 8 14:42:44 2009 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 2