From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 00:51:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B310616A4BF; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9377943FBD; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h817pToP007585; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h817pSNn007584; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:27 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Birrell Message-ID: <20030901075127.GA7526@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030901045513.GA91654@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030901160120.A1311@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030901160120.A1311@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: deischen@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config freebsd-spec.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:51:54 -0000 On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:01:20PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > FWIW (probably not much), I support Dan's position on this. I'd like to > see kse become the default as a true libpthread as has been assumed in > all the work that those guys have done. > > I'll go one step further and say that I don't think libthr should be in > the tree. And libc_r should be shot just as soon as kse is functional on > the tier-1 platforms. Just to be clear, I am making zero statements about the merits of our various threading libs. I am only addressing the options that [our] GCC supports and how we stay roughly in-sync with the FSF GCC sources and behavior.