Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:07:21 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c Message-ID: <41895699.6020300@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20041103220237.GB37480@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200410290824.i9T8Oflr047896@repoman.freebsd.org> <200410291338.50383.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041029234823.GW24892@elvis.mu.org> <200411011429.38840.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041102214014.GA54727@hub.freebsd.org> <41880075.70309@freebsd.org> <20041103220237.GB37480@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:47:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote.. > >>David O'Brien wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:29:38PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Friday 29 October 2004 07:48 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>I made 3-4 requestss, each one had an ACK that said, "sorry, right >>>>>on it!" >>>>> >>>>>It's just not acceptable. >>>> >>>>Are you volunteering to be an re@ secretary ala wilko@? >>> >>> >>>Why does every group now need a secretary? Maybe we just need more >>>members on RE@ that are very active. >> >>With all due respect, I'd like the members of the release engineering >>team to decide what is best for them, and have less armchair >>quarterbacking of what others think we need. > > > I would just like to say this: don't overengineer what aint broken. Sjeez.. > it is hardly a Supreme Court worthy case that re@ forgot to update some > stupid web page is it? > > Wouldn't a normal, if need be public, reply to the automated reminder > email have been sufficient to get that fixed? > To be fair, Alfred had reminded me several times about it, and each time that I edited the list I forgot to scroll down far enough to remember it. Poor organizational skills on my part, nothing more. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41895699.6020300>