From owner-freebsd-ipfw Sun Jul 1 11:32:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6354437B403 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:32:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA31365; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:27:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200107011827.UAA31365@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: BRIDGE in ip_fw.c In-Reply-To: <20010701110834.B296@blossom.cjclark.org> from "Crist J. Clark" at "Jul 1, 2001 11:08:34 am" To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I was assuming host order above since that is always the case now. > > But according to this code, ... > At some point in the future, ip->ip_off might not be in host order by > the time it gets firewall code? don't worry about the future, it might never come :) seriously, if that change is ever made, whoever does it will take care of it or will be guilty if things break cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message