From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 00:14:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2757106566B for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8951F8FC0A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.161.100]) by nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20101118001404.CGZT24340.nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:04 +0000 Received: from johnny.reilly.home ([124.188.161.100]) by nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20101118001404.VMR13035.nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com@johnny.reilly.home>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:13:49 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly To: Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko Message-ID: <20101118001349.GA40554@johnny.reilly.home> References: <20101115045549.GB96011@johnny.reilly.home> <20101117133530.H39988@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101117230638.GA39596@johnny.reilly.home> <1290036416.1899.13.camel@RabbitsDen.RabbitsLawn.verizon.net> <20101117234056.GA40176@johnny.reilly.home> <1290038213.1899.15.camel@RabbitsDen.RabbitsLawn.verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290038213.1899.15.camel@RabbitsDen.RabbitsLawn.verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150205.4CE46FCC.0093,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: rRs2GdT+TAD0zmQs0WyzOwJxyArnqyN48Z4QX81loRIGTUDCp8DeQ9rHK+ZRv9GgxD9EJhqFNGAkaazgTY3Rs9mK Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: Console options for legacy-free mini-itx server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:07 -0000 Hi Alexandre, On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:40 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU > > dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu > > dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU0 > > dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 > > dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 > > dev.cpu.0.freq: 2933 > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2933/90000 2799/83000 2666/77000 2533/71000 2399/65000 2266/59000 2133/53000 1999/46000 1866/40000 1733/34000 1599/28000 1466/22000 1333/16000 1199/10000 1049/8750 899/7500 749/6250 599/5000 449/3750 299/2500 149/1250 > > dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245 > > dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 > > dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 311us > > dev.cpu.1.%desc: ACPI CPU > > dev.cpu.1.%driver: cpu > > dev.cpu.1.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU1 > > dev.cpu.1.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 > > dev.cpu.1.%parent: acpi0 > > dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245 > > dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C1 > > dev.cpu.1.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 191us > > > > Since the cpufreq man page lists the inability to set the > > frequency of different CPUs differently, perhaps this isn't a > > bug at all? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Does portion of 'devinfo -rv' similar to the snippet below show 'est' > attached to both CPUs? > <...> > cpu0 pnpinfo _HID=none _UID=0 at handle=\_PR_.CPU0 > ACPI I/O ports: > 0x1014 > 0x1015 > acpi_perf0 > acpi_throttle0 > coretemp0 > ==> est0 > p4tcc0 > cpufreq0 > cpu1 pnpinfo _HID=none _UID=0 at handle=\_PR_.CPU1 > ACPI I/O ports: > 0x1014 > 0x1015 > acpi_perf1 > acpi_throttle1 > coretemp1 > ==> est1 > p4tcc1 > cpufreq1 > <...> Yes, but as you can see they are not nested under coretemp. devices: cpu0 pnpinfo _HID=none _UID=0 at handle=\_PR_.CPU0 ACPI I/O ports: 0x414 0x415 acpi_perf0 est0 p4tcc0 cpufreq0 cpu1 pnpinfo _HID=none _UID=0 at handle=\_PR_.CPU1 ACPI I/O ports: 0x414 0x415 acpi_perf1 est1 p4tcc1 cpufreq1 This seems to be at odds with the dmesg and sysctl view of things? Cheers, -- Andrew