Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:48:54 -0700 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent nc(1) changes Message-ID: <4BC76DA6.4050303@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <4BC76C02.6050304@bsdforen.de> References: <4BC767FE.4060504@delphij.net> <4BC76C02.6050304@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/04/15 12:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 15/04/2010 21:24, Xin LI wrote: >> ... > > I'd say that the data loss (~1%) when I tried to use nc with UNIX sockets > (on both ends) is much more troublesome than your changes. > Even when I used lockf to synchronize socket access this loss occured > and I have fallen back to using files for messaging in my scripts. Data loss? Sounds like a bug to me. Do you have any reproduction scripts? > Back then I thought I must have done something wrong, but I cannot think > of anything. > > Obviously an option with disadvantages. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLx22mAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBZ+0H/0bHxu91FXiU7vP89M9c16Vo OcImtJKlbJRwIszZtGgQW880/ePnMPS+YV0qhvGm7RAAjZBUf3L6xL/lFkEYjIfK YZCoq9SUT5TJNeLixeQZLdispIxYntFcBABwt61GXjDfvfBzm2CZXxFHE2gMYcbd gOpoIZ6ZsoULdJMQ8EEwQQtAegRL9uUBtv/49gJ010JUSye+8rVawlxXT1mNoMU4 vrFqMmosIP+NOm+Blm0F/BSh4FTUL+XgLfSZFEWzzzwMreQwM6cFUmMZEsc/0IjW DF4epM5J7VoV+xxWIw7aM6ojSHSrgIl7OXcAT9TSzdbJt44/iy/MP5G35JCCFsM= =uxnX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BC76DA6.4050303>