Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:51:40 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen <listreader@lazlarlyricon.com> To: fbsdmail@dnswatch.com Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Gnome2 not supported on the amd64 ARCH? Message-ID: <4D2090FC.5030409@lazlarlyricon.com> In-Reply-To: <0cdfb22d89c8f85ec31704c35982e0e2.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> References: <9193ef9ae95084284226832557f8c755.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102125137.4423cb08@ernst.jennejohn.org> <15cc929589a6426f0dad97fac66ed328.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102150551.24f5193e@ernst.jennejohn.org> <0cdfb22d89c8f85ec31704c35982e0e2.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011-01-02 15:42, fbsdmail@dnswatch.com skrev: <...> > Hello again, and thanks for your response. > I commented it out after responding to your response, and > it happily built. I just figured I'd use the CPUTYPE?= option > to gain better amd64 profiling, but apparently it's only > _really_ available for the i386 CPU's. I say that because > I've always used that option when building on those ARCH types, > and never ran into a problem. Oh well, hopefully sometime son, > it'll be better supported on the amd64 - fingers crossed. :) > > Thanks again for taking the time to respond. > > --Chris > > Hi, I have an Intel CPU that's amd64 compatible, and I use CPUTYPE?=native, which never gave me any problems (I use it for all builds, including kernel and world). I can't say whether it works with AMD CPUs though. Nor can I really say if it makes a difference, because I've never tried without it. /Rolf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D2090FC.5030409>