Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:16:30 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
To:        takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp
Cc:        Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>, acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ACPI megapatch 
Message-ID:  <200009292016.e8TKGUA06256@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:38:34 %2B0900." <200009291538.AAA20648@libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And probe method and identify method should not be confused.
> Memory area check etc.... can be in MD acpi probe code.

Can you explain what you mean here a bit more?  The FACT lookup and 
resource establishment need to be done in the identify routine, not the 
probe routine...

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009292016.e8TKGUA06256>