From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Apr 3 14: 1:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d107.as2.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.92.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50D237B419; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3440TUH059828; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g3440Sc1059825; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:29 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:00:27 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heads up, a bit: ephemeral port range changes In-Reply-To: <20020403214840.GA89405@madman.nectar.cc> Message-ID: <20020403215741.L59420-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > Mike, > > Please do not change this setting in -STABLE. Was this discussed > elsewhere? > > I am strongly against a change that would cause existing machines to > suddenly start using a different port range during a -STABLE upgrade. > > Cheers, > -- > Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ Yes, I asked on -net. All I heard was that other OSes have already made the switch, nothing negative. If this really is going to cause problems, it's better that we find out now rather than wait until 4.6-release. (I don't believe it will cause problems, in any case.) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message