Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:58:54 +0300 (MSK)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, kmacy@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c
Message-ID:  <20080124145713.K15031@mp2.macomnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <47986F27.10401@freebsd.org>
References:  <200711200656.lAK6u4bc021279@repoman.freebsd.org> <4797B77E.2090605@freebsd.org> <20080124005006.D93697@odysseus.silby.com> <47986F27.10401@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...]
> > I'm not generally opposed to security improvements that only affect edge
> > cases... but being unable to connect is not an edge case!
>
> Fully agreed.  I'll reopen the PR and follow up with the originator
> to do some further analysis.  All operating system he cites that were
> unable to connect correctly send timestamps and do not stop after
> the SYN phase.  So there must be something else at play here.  Have
> you received or heart of any *other* reports that may be related to
> the timestamp check?
>
I saw this with my adsl router.  Happy to test patches.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080124145713.K15031>