Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:41:08 +0100
From:      Ulrich Spoerlein <q@galgenberg.net>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Fix excessive RUN_DEPENDS on archivers/rpm
Message-ID:  <20051214104108.GA1184@galgenberg.net>
In-Reply-To: <20051214101631.x0ca6keuo0owow8w@netchild.homeip.net>
References:  <200512132014.jBDKE0QG095682@roadrunner.q.local> <20051214101631.x0ca6keuo0owow8w@netchild.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> I agree that the RUN_DEPENDS is not ok, but:
>=20
> >Index: linux-gtk2/Makefile
>=20
> This needs a working linux-glib2 at install time, since it creates a list=
 of
> gtk2 modules with the <mumble>query-modules program. By removing the
> BUILD_DEPENDS of linux-glib2 it's not possible to generate the list on the
> build cluster.

But RUN_DEPENDS get satisified _before_ the do-install target. At least
on my system glib2 will be installed, before the actual installation of
gtk2.

Since these ports set NO_BUILD and their build-stage is empty,
BUILD_DEPENDS is aequivalent to RUN_DEPENDS. At least that's how I see
it.

Ulrich Spoerlein
--=20
 PGP Key ID: F0DB9F44				Encrypted mail welcome!
Fingerprint: F1CE D062 0CA9 ADE3 349B  2FE8 980A C6B5 F0DB 9F44
Ok, which part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn."
didn't you understand?

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDn/bEmArGtfDbn0QRAqt7AJsHmZj28H/98J+BywhE30QcOhKeEACfWmjz
GUy6307kFcMo7KtpieS/U4g=
=m83S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051214104108.GA1184>