Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:29:44 +0000 From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> To: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD license vs /usr/bin/true license Message-ID: <4F27FAD8.7000507@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <tdqltrotmcxnvhqtczro@pxrl> References: <tdqltrotmcxnvhqtczro@pxrl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/31/12 12:55, vermaden wrote: > FreeBSD, as specified here [1] uses 2-clause BSD license, > but /usr/bin/true [2] (as empty as it is) uses something like > 3-clause BSD license, is that desired? > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html > [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/usr.bin/true/true.c By coincidence, this link turned up on Hacker News Daily this morning. It's about the copyright on the true command. http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/humor/ATT_Copyright_true.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F27FAD8.7000507>