From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 01:12:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79DF43D5 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 01:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phlegethon.blisses.org (phlegethon.blisses.org [50.56.97.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD61BA7 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 01:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blisses.org (cocytus.blisses.org [23.25.209.73]) by phlegethon.blisses.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 776FB1F12C3; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:11:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:11:52 -0400 From: Mason Loring Bliss To: Daniel Subject: Re: geli not recognizing keyboard Message-ID: <20141005011152.GC4141@blisses.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 01:12:01 -0000 On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:28:44PM -0700, Daniel wrote: > I tried with multiple different keyboards connected. Here's an Apple > keyboard and a standard PC Roswill keyboard. I remember this from IRC. To add to what I'd mentioned there (as ChibaPet) , I should note that with the latest STABLE it takes a few seconds before hitting enter registers. Just to make sure you're not seeing the same thing, I'd be interested in seeing what happens if you wait a full fifteen seconds and then whack "enter" a couple times. That won't be far off the lag I've sometimes seen. I can't see the situation with your keyboard being all that different from what I see - the problem description is identical. Also, note that there are some definite problems found here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2014-February/012768.html Maybe the issue needs to have a PR associated. Maybe there already is one... -- Mason Loring Bliss mason@blisses.org Ewige Blumenkraft! (if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, Scene I From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 03:18:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8701BC21 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 03:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5493B823 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 03:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.100] ([71.245.162.117]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlmMg-1Y9g6X2Zrk-00ZT1j for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:18:13 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 23:18:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Xihong Yin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 10 stable buildworld failed Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:s244L/BWh4173FH4wtgDnNIlkgL7jny990nf4wJWLsuY116dfZy Fxpe72j5DPJYDhjaVCqjbTp3vQg8/d4Qmxvk1uv2RZ6eoMxhpIYiZf0a+6b1R6mXWwL23q+ +bMBAop6VKEQAxnfey6CNryLs1AY0dbSuwGb9fviKvR0aXnSZT76z3DUoYTuK8AsOdJOBYj rIGGTkXOGDXHdShb3ChQQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 03:18:15 -0000 Hi, I updated the base source to stable 10. The 'make buildworld' failed with the following messages: c++ -march=i486 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libcxxrt/../../contrib/libcxxrt -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -Wno-parentheses -march=i486 -fconserve-space -Wno-c++11-extensions -c /usr/src/lib/libcxxrt/../../contrib/libcxxrt/terminate.cc -o terminate.o c++: error: unknown argument: '-fconserve-space' *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake[3]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libcxxrt *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake[2]: stopped in /usr/src *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake[1]: stopped in /usr/src *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake: stopped in /usr/src *** [buildworld] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Could you please help? Xihong From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 03:45:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D326520A for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 03:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A38A5E for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 03:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id cm18so2333140qab.34 for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 20:45:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DWBlgBc/bKjVHWbFPzwwIzM2znuJMNMPM72D3xwoyWA=; b=c7QXDP+1z79oVn6KGfp1Y7dDSM6xveAx7wcc0wi8RZa9DnewTYaIBRnUIjvpkgYBdg akRpbV9hTf5jm17Fiy8QHG5GZKM/p/DkEFfRANmZtNQJF6lTpPAoNfj9dzA2BEMiVJvm KSiQp4/z3vICmd3WilXg8/EFWho6tt8twJwUGTCDA98lvpCeScwe251z7YGMqhHj0zEy fl7nzepLizsup8RvD1MawWzVzsI1ap8FM2/30jS/eJBUkIdCujqSmpBd3FOQKSNV6tfU XfPmoyOWRB1rgfVVwPtyMie0hlqOlEyPWZrONgrysL5GiKjg17SOJKlfp2loRGEllzx2 mq2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlW9NQFCEhcEzM3phPrIRlxkC7mUQJsic9EO1RJbEkJMkyMZGhH1ZbOpy4sQci1VCWTgG2z MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.29.195 with SMTP id b61mr17788891qgb.27.1412480344898; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 20:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 20:39:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [66.220.121.156] In-Reply-To: <20141005011152.GC4141@blisses.org> References: <20141005011152.GC4141@blisses.org> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 20:39:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vyWyuA4beFYqP_Cvhk0I6YLvO-I Message-ID: Subject: Re: geli not recognizing keyboard From: Daniel To: Mason Loring Bliss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 03:45:37 -0000 I tried waiting quite a long time before hitting enter. I hit enter multiple times, chatted with you on IRC, and tried again, multiple times. I followed up a bug here, but it seems this one has been dead in the water for along time: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131415 Are the relevant people following this, or? On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:28:44PM -0700, Daniel wrote: > > > I tried with multiple different keyboards connected. Here's an Apple > > keyboard and a standard PC Roswill keyboard. > > I remember this from IRC. > > To add to what I'd mentioned there (as ChibaPet) , I should note that with > the latest STABLE it takes a few seconds before hitting enter registers. > > Just to make sure you're not seeing the same thing, I'd be interested in > seeing what happens if you wait a full fifteen seconds and then whack > "enter" > a couple times. That won't be far off the lag I've sometimes seen. > > I can't see the situation with your keyboard being all that different from > what I see - the problem description is identical. > > Also, note that there are some definite problems found here: > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2014-February/012768.html > > Maybe the issue needs to have a PR associated. Maybe there already is > one... > > -- > Mason Loring Bliss mason@blisses.org Ewige > Blumenkraft! > (if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, > Scene I > -- "America was founded by men who understood that the threat of domestic tyranny is as great as any threat from abroad. If we want to be worthy of their legacy, we must resist the rush toward ever-increasing state control of our society. Otherwise, our own government will become a greater threat to our freedoms than any foreign terrorist." - Ron Paul, Texas Straight Talk, May 31, 2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 16:30:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 302069A5 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BECB08 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so2033425pdi.5 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=V9wYueV7hqjHFnWuQ+dilk3BIQJ2QFCmPB8qH3tPX/Y=; b=MxuvU8HHGRaLvz72VlsuMUfJLVRnN5rwG7m59iXSnZuX+42UCvlq45NsdtwikK5lFf Wv+iWJG9lzWa6y1TXeJMupGz6CbBMakAp2O3IDjYL/pIDGquVuzcFAneSFSp/fgEY8fv ndh79Pp8Gld+X2/yPMe6y+Kml0jPO0veKwC4uzILaZGZxwAkdUQ0bYLpeJckhGH+L+VM LMfCpjzW/dTBa1hWKEmKZ6VcWoGzOmBa4W6HTqGYvXzco/zxB50iZimkVG8xHJIUxCKN fSBUxPyrauXSjLrDDzT0MorMos4KTPb1WLGRkMeQvsTK+LH3zbIFgrFHnCMST1lRgnBi m7Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7+Irp6q+fkpiupJ/grgtxthkkyzg/uPW6bk3Y3Lc9r1XYGgAx08xscntu7QQxB8+oI56W X-Received: by 10.70.37.7 with SMTP id u7mr1090754pdj.155.1412526640369; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elk.localnet ([2604:8800:100:82aa:6ef0:49ff:fe05:658b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm9009913pdh.30.2014.10.05.09.30.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlj by elk.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xaohg-0001hG-Hd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:30:36 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geli not recognizing keyboard References: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:30:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Daniel's message of "Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:28:44 -0700") Message-ID: <87oatqeaxf.fsf@elk.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:30:47 -0000 Daniel writes: > Hi, > > I did a fresh install with 10.1-BETA3 yesterday. I decided to encrypt the > boot partition using geli (only option given). > > The keyboard i have is a USB keyboard. The keyboard works fine in all > scenarios except for when prompted with the geli password. > > http://i.minus.com/ibbw2T5C7Oppp5.jpg > > I tried with multiple different keyboards connected. Here's an Apple > keyboard and a standard PC Roswill keyboard. > > There's no response at all from geli. > > I tried installing FreeBSD without geli and I had no issues with the > keyboard to login later during boot. It appears to be a problem with geli. > > I do want to have my boot drive encrypted. > > Does anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? Money to send me? > > > Motherboard: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FM4M7TQ I just realized that I am seeing something similar that might be related. I don't use geli, but my usb keyboard isn't recognized until about halfway through the boot process. It works for BIOS setup and after boot, but it doesn't work during the boot menu stage. I don't know enough to know what the problem is, but that might help someone else limit where the problem is. You might want to try a minimal installation without geli and see if that is also true for you. If it is the same problem, then it has been around for a while since mine is running 9.1-RELEASE. My keyboard is actually a wireless usb one, but that is probably no different than regular usb. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 16:45:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1936CEB2 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956FDCEB for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s95Gj7LE052517; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 03:45:08 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 03:45:07 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Daniel Subject: Re: geli not recognizing keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20141006033320.G56328@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mason Loring Bliss , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:45:17 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 539, Issue 7, Message: 10 On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 20:39:04 -0700 Daniel wrote: > I tried waiting quite a long time before hitting enter. I hit enter > multiple times, chatted with you on IRC, and tried again, multiple times. > > I followed up a bug here, but it seems this one has been dead in the water > for along time: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131415 > > Are the relevant people following this, or? Some may have spare time to monitor questions@ but I expect most are likely busy polishing off 10.1, now at RC1, over on stable@ (and up) I suggest asking about this issue on stable@freebsd.org where some are bound to have geli in scope, and will want to know about new? problems. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 03:36:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57261C56 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 03:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B442FA for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 03:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f15so3578963lbj.11 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IUylxUK7Dz1be+Nl/2F02QKJWQsWWMwwABfPCIrQWS4=; b=H15kUnUyrG420cBVFkPUzAc6BR87diwsPeoa3NBN+uEAZXPButUifkJm3OcCtjUUZo 5pr8U5kbn8i1tA9DI/41aLc9tl+e4CqklqIeirdtX2OLCv1fHvtNC+a+y5QaiUhoFFTB bId2rSWxpOd5VscTpcWyJSwwkaEHx830kGb1yO3dgyYzAQKJgwcJ6lE5+zcZczta7jvq W8yTatmE2+t4HjlY+DTGeTj2qBI7duQtcPIB+p3dM3v9dkwudzq/Pq6xb6DmX20WbCZn 2WMbuGEDi4RddeZdJEDTT8psJxDTPzagO5HV7Qs+H2CRdndmkQRv6TtWmrL0b2c3vI2K c/ZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.148.170 with SMTP id tt10mr21241499lbb.61.1412566585568; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 20:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.132 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: ultrawide display w/ nvidia From: Waitman Gobble To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:36:28 -0000 Had a little trouble getting an nvidia card to do ultrawide 21:9 mode, It was only doing 1920x1080 stretched to 2560x1080. :( But , it looks like the xorg.conf configuration line that makes all the difference is... Option "metamodes" "nvidia-auto-select +0+0 {viewportin=2560x1080}" in Section "Screen" (in case someone runs across in the future, hopefully it helps save some effort.) i'm using FreeBSD afia.waitman.net 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r272566: Sun Oct 5 17:48:02 PDT 2014 waitman@afia.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AFIA amd64 nvidia-driver-331.67_1 -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 04:14:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CCA329E for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 04:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x243.google.com (mail-ig0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3BD854 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 04:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f195.google.com with SMTP id l13so730283iga.6 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KJFb/bpA0O4NO+SpQjJDhCNUV1Fi/6NR1hykO3IClmo=; b=x88rRBz+sXDPjGIOhFnOWNY3p01mLoT7kaBXPzwJPDYKyRqnNggNffLyHn9TAfHB07 usBhBmYSHwYgJJ5huaJttnRCdiKDOtwfo0X7iVR6r7kaiqqh1jKaD1WHpAlVWMNPDTGs NkiwSWai8nctHbJelS72xS1VAYRhBSTGm68aBtyPhB+gOQTvo88/B7gk9J4mT4N8lDEF 02IK2NJkqSM4J3hXtWf1ZTnesQPpto6g314ro0ZFL/CVUBns6rxjNRoRJSCtx/fjtpbn AYcHReiSZg19FZErX5fPXs7uZNziV7GX5+KrL8NWPRM86wN8clHIOCXhFLvFJRG8EbXq aDFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.36.74 with SMTP id o10mr15986614igj.45.1412568855476; Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.136.36 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.136.36 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Fffg From: cesar arango To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 04:14:16 -0000 Fffff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 07:52:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47E3126 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it [188.10.129.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD4EF0A for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (unknown [192.168.0.60]) by host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3B73698 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:52:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54324A41.8080208@cloverinformatica.it> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:52:33 +0200 From: Maurizio Vairani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Subject: Re: Downgrade a pkg References: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> In-Reply-To: <542E6E3F.9040405@cloverinformatica.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 07:52:42 -0000 Il 03/10/2014 11:37, Maurizio Vairani ha scritto: > Hello, > > I need to downgrade VirtualBox to version 4.3.12_1. > How can I do it ? > > Thanks in advance, > Maurizio > Thank you guys, but fridays I was in hurry and I have done in this way: The server is only few days old and I haven't the old virtualbox-ose package. I have solved the problem, but the solution is not very elegant: with svn I have downloaded the ports revision 367888 and compiled virtualbox from source. Step by step instructions: - Inhttps://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/emulators/virtualbox-ose/?view=log I have found the last revision of version 4.3.12: 367888 - I have installed svn # pkg install subversion - Downloaded the ports revision 367888 # svn co -r 367888 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head /usr/ports - Installed portmaster # pkg install portmaster - Compiled virtualbox from source # portmaster emulators/virtualbox-ose Note that some ports give me some errors, I have installed the corresponding package with 'pkg install' and restarted the 'portmaster emulators/virtualbox-ose' command again. Fortunately now I have a working VirtualBox version 4.2.12. Regards, Maurizio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 07:56:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557371DC for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1A6F37 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 131so1743855ykp.38 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:56:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jV9jXPJtfxHGhqYwIKozPlTsk5ZVPBQLTpTZVZ9pT64=; b=XwxkWQ5ucCYmO94aGIpAQ+/Mv4WuLeb7lpP8SmxXFPPQ9kuUinIyv8SMTobD4QaGt5 emuhqk5LeuGsy2QEgVMUn0tlE5dA2BiTLWPxDvudK9jCbyhh0fpodCm+70WlC9DiCEMQ d8j5sZjzhW7KO+n81/qIkbvHqP5u7QWQz99CiDVaq/sdE2kJDiDplkI8RU7DFMeFp1WW rLnAsljXUnkyR/5MtgEp6sqvBbi7fcKexE61ybrjR9SvLCU0Urti06IYZvYufOPNFXyf aq3s2iVLxsvTIB/cE/s9+bk5woFYltPf99p+9UT7uykk/Uo2q3L5a3F1ISyTFdgXUdN+ U8Cg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.230.70 with SMTP id i66mr34984763yhq.26.1412582200161; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 00:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.156.139 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 00:56:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20141003182703.GA1060@unixarea.DDR.dd> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:56:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to restart 'make buildkernel' From: krad To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 07:56:41 -0000 Better still ctrl-z it then you just have to type fg to bring it back On 3 October 2014 21:20, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > If I have to interrupt a 'make buildkernel', how I can restart it from >> the point of interrupt and not from scratch? >> > > # make -DNO_CLEAN buildkernel > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 14:47:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D1E848 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-0500.emailmediator.com (c-0500.emailmediator.com [64.85.162.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32BFE69C for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pool-71-170-88-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net ([71.170.88.63] helo=reedmedia.net) by c-0500.emailmediator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xb8ye-0006sz-P8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:09:28 -0400 Received: from reed@reedmedia.net by reedmedia.net with local (mailout 0.17) id 18129-1412604567; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:09:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:09:27 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" X-X-Sender: reed@t1.m.reedmedia.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: using code coverage with clang Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (NEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:47:25 -0000 For a few years I have been building different code with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage with gcc on different BSDs and different Linuxes. I would build with that, run various tests, and then use gcov or lcov to see the code that was ran. When I changed from FreeBSD 9.x to 10.0-RELEASE-p1, I went from gcc to clang. But this causes /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/../lib/libprofile_rt.a: No such file: No such file or directory I don't have that library. Any suggestions on how to get it so I don't have to maintain later during upgrades. I don't think the clang ports have it either. I'd prefer to not maintain all my dependencies (ports) using gcc. (Currently I cannot use gcc with the clang-built ports as some libraries appear to be built differently so references aren't seen the same.) Does anyone have suggestions for doing code coverage with clang? Or are there binary packages available for 10.0 on amd64 built with gcc? (I found a forum discussion about it at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=47260 and several other reports about it.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 16:14:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7407CE5A for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A0B24B for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z60so3884352qgd.19 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:14:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LvCWoUcEBnPLkxFc/YXhqLaa4ub0gRYJpcZEzJqXPdU=; b=VAuVhPtn92Q8Zm5Q5nP+Rlbl7pgJomFe4lKXSFEf1qHIsOkSc9TUB3FBU6MR7Zrlj8 /LfR4s61zWsNUbIKT7YZeu0IZWKS6bj2mDU28LKvGaX2M7Gm0/w2PTKlNN/jTZe4vUiV XyBb4RwJwOeNT1Yt7uP8f36f1vaNTyuOpc/nK1z3Rxtt8GzyZL90yQ3z8hOklYfJgTPL lpAFWErcBsyfVcySRTyObySNJLvBTBvJSh1cq8MmiZB6JflKCuiPXW/6UnDC2l6KK+rz UbgnwD5E0F2mpKjWPvyTLp4Im7qkBQEW1ymSmV+Dl9D/p2pncGZ7zia5PN/tMMMSRazW jENg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzzR0zT680yh7UJV+sEnEoxpMJjGXdHrmfFGmnMMjlH49VOKI6bT4X+wMbWMSNcvXTOnEv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.36.145 with SMTP id p17mr28729966qgp.61.1412612070818; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:14:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [66.220.121.156] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:14:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JzyzNB2igMK534jtyl6OXV5uJrs Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 540, Issue 1 From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:14:33 -0000 > > > The keyboard i have is a USB keyboard. The keyboard works fine in all > > scenarios except for when prompted with the geli password. > > > > http://i.minus.com/ibbw2T5C7Oppp5.jpg > > > > I just realized that I am seeing something similar that might be > related. I don't use geli, but my usb keyboard isn't recognized until > about halfway through the boot process. It works for BIOS setup and > after boot, but it doesn't work during the boot menu stage. I don't > know enough to know what the problem is, but that might help someone > else limit where the problem is. You might want to try a minimal > installation without geli and see if that is also true for you. If it > is the same problem, then it has been around for a while since mine is > running 9.1-RELEASE. My keyboard is actually a wireless usb one, but > that is probably no different than regular usb. > It works fine without geli, but I'm not sure what stage in the boot process to check for it to start working. Do you just hit keys constantly to see? I looked in the forums yesterday and people reporting the same issue I have saying things worked fine until 9.1-RELEASE. So it could very well be. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 16:32:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C094BE for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm17-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm17-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.223]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FA4688 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:32:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1412613159; bh=mQuuCrli+st/jkDjJZT3DKS+icBtSX5IBNsa6jsYcYc=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=msuqBHSaXHY9sbiOFmd8ok4ZeaKWcKodcI28yBBxZbcgES4bRvHxcjUq0I4scv0QgQ/jANabjXpnxjP6V+FvIF724dqvfL1xGp9J+DTpbknRGj0BkCg1EhiGH0Ig5xe8D2BmMlM2slIVV2uk1v+Fb4ruqLnx+8C9mF2WnwAQowXLK6oPMmqBVnAquqDIQyH5XBeKvo2aEZSvW30zfE1e1acf9OUEMJWiZVEThC8OFiSwB/whwAbQLoCzLEH9p6Zycq815EzEtRZoweoqgoz2Z/utTqvIpUjLwv8FW7KcRBDwhCvMEddkVkaC9KXVrl6KXLRCUAdZhZZdP5SFMnAo7Q== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.es; b=CBu1Bwj7Q3aeUppn17xx5vRPw+zyOA0oGmOBQ6e44iZGkdgGazndUKnqrMS3LXK63O/PS4faCE4CvjCCk1Q4L9qLJO5yRINGztxeHwahUKUTPy/p+/PObzP8Gi5rQ3rOJs2H2PnyDr4v7yja321i7L+IUORirAeQ4mdBWsJk8tc5z/ZDYJ1uOo+P+RslQUYjAQQWM8y7Ah4whwfUCXFPlzFiivrHGOkf9yzJvbEAQZ8nVUZ7YouXbW5n7GAt/Pjf3Sd1i60PC5ZE4cOpO4Cnv4RaVcNLytXfxI5HFaxUsVhBiekLoroIxkOpcpD/rCkiqlW33iWLT6nSeGxwX6k+ng==; Received: from [212.82.98.59] by nm17.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2014 16:32:39 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.108] by tm12.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2014 16:32:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp145.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2014 16:32:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1412613159; bh=mQuuCrli+st/jkDjJZT3DKS+icBtSX5IBNsa6jsYcYc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NUsFeYMI3YW2RvGWUZl5AIw9C+ZdLiG7yasnXXHujWB8rCg7fhjIqPfeharltlJIpsaxorCfNdIOX+Mn7lTXNugSWjM7Pta6aTyInnAGmaIhKxCcdHPZYgR2o23bX8T+ttoADU9sysk4BQnoXPJfDzGhsFRamms8yiTTt9v3Kys= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 760701.35445.bm@smtp145.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 8v0.E9EVM1lGf2lFMKMscOdkTmYAMCXupgEwPvVqBHMETkd IOYzrYhIDoLJQ.jEem8QvVmFngHVV0TRVGMm9EeMCtKufKvPh_C08O1.9k0E 524frGzL5AgUzYqMkWjWhJNNuDM82lusYbGEdwhdEGqsV7M.Hzqy68yqiO_h BWjJMrcDWixLMekPxe2uYmRDo2m9XJr2wpo1vJ7HiN0bZ5_1qu5in1ipODWW _.thKwEN_wXFbn247XdJsxlWvd83HQ3w6Y.c6ZK_qRF3JqxGFKoybiKSymIW SwM1g3bP40a98lauMsHNhQzBfCBefEUdUGB3UopKYTsloPFRAV.Di_gckNlC 5PGf2FwFRb8I3OxeD0Xw8mLchu3uZNPzLxKe12AyDIya7OkraEIvsz2S.18V n0Wq8Chvtl9ahPkEpPLV911KG_j.g1cwxaRNnpCf0z8XNYlS87ikvuCcrNTd Rx507xnV7sdhier5J.9tUDN8vJShUx8cLYZmFy08h94x150zSw_OU1JlQDYL KWwrCOZtm1fwnf9PdeV0HXHngSNfJoAnU8a38kgAT595fCLoTyYb1_T68ReS ryqwAnv4ELvKEhFJg2URvgQO1VGGGnpG3EyPgeitJ X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:33:17 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using code coverage with clang Message-Id: <20141006183317.cfc27cb4d7a2b7b8ce1e3efe@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:32:50 -0000 On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:09:27 -0500 (CDT) "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote: > For a few years I have been building different code with > -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage with gcc on different BSDs and > different Linuxes. I would build with that, run various tests, and > then use gcov or lcov to see the code that was ran. > > When I changed from FreeBSD 9.x to 10.0-RELEASE-p1, I went from gcc > to clang. But this causes > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/../lib/libprofile_rt.a: No such file: No such > file or directory > > I don't have that library. Any suggestions on how to get it so I > don't have to maintain later during upgrades. I don't think the > clang ports have it either. > > I'd prefer to not maintain all my dependencies (ports) using gcc. > (Currently I cannot use gcc with the clang-built ports as some > libraries appear to be built differently so references aren't seen > the same.) > > Does anyone have suggestions for doing code coverage with clang? I use the static analyzer (in the Computer Science meaning of the term) from clang. F.ex.: scan-build34 -o /home/gowen/projects/gummy_project/Analyze make -j 2 -e -f Makefile Runs the clang34 static analyzer and outputs a html report. Perhaps it can help you. > Or are there binary packages available for 10.0 on amd64 built with > gcc? > > (I found a forum discussion about it at > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=47260 and several > other reports about it.) --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 18:22:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDAAA2 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout06.plus.net (avasout06.plus.net [212.159.14.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB693B8 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 18:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout06 with smtp id zuNA1o004516WCc01uNB2J; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:22:11 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=HNxNF+dv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=PBtdaOD29JoA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=8kADFqRAsQ7YgqLa2P0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=ah4zAuBDUaYyBcBxsWAA:9 a=QpiVlW0pTUBfaCBl:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XbCvB-00014C-JD; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:22:09 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:22:08 +0100 Message-ID: <5352912.xfjBXPP2uH@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <542E8F3C.5030408@gmail.com> References: <20141003120840.348155b6.freebsd@edvax.de> <542E8F3C.5030408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: log in and password. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Andrei Brezan , allen harris X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:22:19 -0000 On Friday 03 Oct 2014 13:57:48 Andrei Brezan wrote: > On 10/03/14 12:08, Polytropon wrote: > > When you enter single user mode, no password should be required. > > At the boot prompt, enter "boot -s", and then confirm /bin/sh > > as the default shell. Enter the command "mount -uw /" to access > > the root partition (where the password is stored). Then enter > > "passwd" (or "passwd root") to change root's password. You will > > not be asked for the previous password. > > If ZFS is used I would do a "zfs list" to see which fs has the > rootfs and "zfs set readonly=off name/of/rootfs" > > Also it might help to "zfs mount -a" to mount all other filesystems > as /usr. > > I never tried mount -uw in single user mode on zfs though. After converting my system from ufs to zfs I just kept on using "mount -u /" out of habit and it's always worked OK. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 19:48:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09EAFFA2 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-0500.emailmediator.com (c-0500.emailmediator.com [64.85.162.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9EA1EAB for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pool-71-170-88-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net ([71.170.88.63] helo=reedmedia.net) by c-0500.emailmediator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbEGr-00072N-28 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:48:37 -0400 Received: from reed@reedmedia.net by reedmedia.net with local (mailout 0.17) id 6807-1412624916; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:48:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:48:36 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" X-X-Sender: reed@t1.m.reedmedia.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using code coverage with clang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (NEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:48:37 -0000 > I use the static analyzer (in the Computer Science meaning of the > term) from clang. F.ex.: > > scan-build34 -o /home/gowen/projects/gummy_project/Analyze make -j 2 > -e -f Makefile > > Runs the clang34 static analyzer and outputs a html report. Perhaps it > can help you. I have used it many times, but I don't know how it may be used to show run-time analysis of the code. (I tried again but don't see if the "static" analysis can do "dynamic" reporting.) It is useful, but not what I am looking for. Is anyone doing code coverage analysis with clang (and maybe with lcov or llvm-cov) on FreeBSD 10? Maybe some port should provide the libprofile_rt from llvm's compiler-rt? I had tried clang34 and llvm34 but missing libprofile_rt.a. I then tried clang-devel and llvm-devel which provide llvm-cov but don't have libprofile. It fails with /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/llvm-devel/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/lib/freebsd/libclang_r t.profile-amd64.a: No such file: No such file or directory Where can I find that? By the way, http://www.freebsdports.info/ports/devel/llvm-devel.html shows lib/libprofile_rt.a and lib/libprofile_rt.so which I don't have with clang-devel-3.6.r218451_1 and llvm-devel-3.6.r218451. Any hints before I create a bug ticket? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 20:54:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6D7994 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 20:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7C3918 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 20:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so5862516pad.22 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=yFCZhy7vvtpNW6CC4lbWr6St8K1OP1YwuL6XFNmd6Rw=; b=GfnqMknglCDBn4MyoT6AJC9KHRID4Rc+FRm2PI8LgxvK/mZT8lP4dxhWOVSIpaMLxO HpdUrx/nJqmMAtimrwJ5nIoi0H354fQbI6FUUEFcfOUaNh/X5El7y0byx4LoSBTqj5C1 8gUHDhExC0A17aZDFgfAiv5/pX1lAZyGZHNQdVb3XjEth73+gpCMe20N7G2gRVv6LJOV ys0Ld+1IJdTr+wxTOt+wKNtubH4no5pSTOY3QGfZLB8j3RbUUaTIXP/j6Yw+Hsa83ZiZ CHqZVM8xaruC7sdMxsrmfwQ9WA6znPJDv5JHzJ3XObOyW1qSevAZ+PHtPRYE54zjaoJE v0Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzi61/bI8GtEQeNlz3cHRTYzi3MshR+449huWOR0F1XOfdvC/6e/i5mV9qEyLHLqcIY65X X-Received: by 10.66.235.8 with SMTP id ui8mr26463627pac.63.1412628833488; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elk.localnet ([2604:8800:100:82aa:6ef0:49ff:fe05:658b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ca2sm14113963pbc.26.2014.10.06.13.53.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlj by elk.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbFHx-0003w6-TD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:53:49 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 540, Issue 1 References: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:53:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Daniel's message of "Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:14:30 -0700") Message-ID: <87k34cex7m.fsf@elk.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:54:00 -0000 Daniel writes: >> >> > The keyboard i have is a USB keyboard. The keyboard works fine in all >> > scenarios except for when prompted with the geli password. >> > >> > http://i.minus.com/ibbw2T5C7Oppp5.jpg >> > >> > > >> I just realized that I am seeing something similar that might be >> related. I don't use geli, but my usb keyboard isn't recognized until >> about halfway through the boot process. It works for BIOS setup and >> after boot, but it doesn't work during the boot menu stage. I don't >> know enough to know what the problem is, but that might help someone >> else limit where the problem is. You might want to try a minimal >> installation without geli and see if that is also true for you. If it >> is the same problem, then it has been around for a while since mine is >> running 9.1-RELEASE. My keyboard is actually a wireless usb one, but >> that is probably no different than regular usb. >> > > It works fine without geli, but I'm not sure what stage in the boot process > to check for it to start working. Do you just hit keys constantly to see? > I looked in the forums yesterday and people reporting the same issue I have > saying things worked fine until 9.1-RELEASE. So it could very well be. In my case I can't use the keyboard during the boot menu, so I can't select single user mode or verbose boot. Instead I have to wait through the timeout to get a normal boot. If that works properly on yours, then this must be an independent problem. I was thinking about it more and the boot menu is probably controlled by the loader, but I don't know if geli password is also handled by the loader. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 03:16:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE725CB for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward4m.mail.yandex.net (forward4m.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:2519::3:13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9D73A6 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23m.yandex.ru (web23m.yandex.ru [37.140.138.114]) by forward4m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CD50B232071F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:16:04 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23m.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4B4DF25A0604; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:16:04 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412651764; bh=nRRoD5VXL1TnPiqlJXsB6UKvfccNF7jYHmZk3510gvI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=BbO55NdHK6noDQRw0z45JPhmYZcfqWe34dIEVyU1Rd3+PYukbOQKnqp6Vl+CU4cCB 86d/pdc+rriR4UCVuS57PXd7RyUIcJXZDU6eqI3ZOnywshRQPhp1ijFYQkZ0Jolxup T4H5WqAoK+Sc6WEcXnca6oGmXQ8H2TDx4tGsNn/A= Received: from tsn109-201-152-246.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-246.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.246]) by web23m.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:16:03 +0400 From: Martin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 05:16:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 03:16:09 -0000 I am at the brink of pulling my hair out on this one. I have a Debian Linux box server that is sharing some directories on LAN using NFS. The /etc/export: /pub1/ foobox(crossmnt,rw,async,no_subtree_check) I can, as a normal user, on any Linux box on the LAN mount this directory and because it is shared as "rw" I can both read and write. However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. The directory is setup on the FreeBSD box in fstab: share:/pub1 /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 nfs noauto,rw 0 0 The user is in group "wheel" and "network", however he cannot mount whether he is using fstab or not. The 'nfs_client_enable="YES"' is in rc.conf too. $ mount mnt/share/pub1 mount: mnt/share/pub1: unknown special file or file system Trying full path: $ mount /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied Trying without fstab: $ mount -t nfs share:/pub1 mnt/share/pub1 [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied $ mount -t nfs share:/pub1 /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied I can mount and write without problems as root. How do I solve this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 03:30:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7121E900 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE44751 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-189.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s973UQng024578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 22:30:27 -0500 Message-ID: <54335FC9.80405@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:36:41 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 03:30:34 -0000 On 10/06/14 22:16, Martin wrote: > I am at the brink of pulling my hair out on this one. > > I have a Debian Linux box server that is sharing some directories on LAN using NFS. > > The /etc/export: > > /pub1/ foobox(crossmnt,rw,async,no_subtree_check) > > I can, as a normal user, on any Linux box on the LAN mount this directory and because it is shared as "rw" I can both read and write. > > However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. > > The directory is setup on the FreeBSD box in fstab: > > share:/pub1 /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 nfs noauto,rw 0 0 > > The user is in group "wheel" and "network", however he cannot mount whether he is using fstab or not. The 'nfs_client_enable="YES"' is in rc.conf too. > > $ mount mnt/share/pub1 > mount: mnt/share/pub1: unknown special file or file system > > Trying full path: > > $ mount /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 > [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied > > Trying without fstab: > > $ mount -t nfs share:/pub1 mnt/share/pub1 > [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied > > $ mount -t nfs share:/pub1 /home/user/mnt/share/pub1 > [tcp] share:/pub1: Permission denied > > I can mount and write without problems as root. > > How do I solve this? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Try adding 'users' to your fstab arguments: 'noauto,rw,users' .... You might also check the permissions of the share mount-point on the host machine, w/ the share unmounted, that can give issues as well. I don't have a good sol'n for the latter problem, since I have the same non-root user on all boxen on my soho LAN, but I know it can be worked around .... $0.02, no more, no less .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 13:19:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9AAF88 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward15.mail.yandex.net (forward15.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AA1DA3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23j.yandex.ru (web23j.yandex.ru [5.45.198.64]) by forward15.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BD7B09E10DD for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:19:24 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 55C1D4900134; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:19:24 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412687964; bh=iTqsYX8bePC1wSwID+1Nw9dUpBdqCuEEJtLFydpSprI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=BSNkw6MBvSWCk0AkiPpxW9Povj2tsKADvibe9IMhx4FG8irNVCfD5jf0EIQeLv8Cy 8YR3sYWOWu2b+zhsXFYPMbRb181VfvkV3z+OogNHgCC/e711a/cMPkqmdoJ6lLnXos MiUBMXULrv++kNSJ700wn0/R86i5dxS5Z4ruxO0I= Received: from tsn109-201-152-9.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-9.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.9]) by web23j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:19:24 +0400 From: Martin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1384981412687964@web23j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:19:24 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:19:29 -0000 > Try adding 'users' to your fstab arguments: 'noauto,rw,users' .... You > might also check the permissions of the share mount-point on the host > machine, w/ the share unmounted, that can give issues as well. I have tried that also, same result. I am seriously thinking about using SMB instead of NFS, even across nix'es only. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 13:35:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB59AE3A for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965D6FBC for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 26A2A33C46; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:35:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Martin Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:35:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> (Martin's message of "Tue, 07 Oct 2014 05:16:03 +0200") Message-ID: <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:35:26 -0000 Martin writes: > However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. Is the export marked "insecure"? You'll get different port numbers for root as opposed to a normal user. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 13:41:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9774295 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B77A12B for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s97DfRTA020159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 08:41:27 -0500 Message-ID: <5433EEFE.6020408@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:47:42 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:41:30 -0000 On 10/07/14 08:35, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Martin writes: > >> However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. > Is the export marked "insecure"? > You'll get different port numbers for root as opposed to a normal user. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Good call, I just looked @ 1 of my Linux boxen & my /etc/exports file on that box indeed has insecure as an option .... I think we may have a winner .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 15:19:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73521827 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8CEEC7 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s97FJER9009801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:19:14 -0500 Message-ID: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:25:29 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: oddball pkg output .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:19:16 -0000 I did a 'pkg -vRL=' & got the following: [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:21:40am] 673 % pkg version -vRL= Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100% 968 B 1.0k/s 00:01 Fetching digests.txz: 100% 2 MB 407.4k/s 00:05 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 5 MB 377.0k/s 00:14 Removing expired repository entries: 100% Processing new repository entries: 100% FreeBSD repository update completed. 23426 packages processed: 23241 updated, 68 removed and 65 added. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. bash-4.3.27 < needs updating (remote has 4.3.27_1) db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 deluge-1.3.6_5,1 < needs updating (remote has 1.3.7,1) dri-9.1.7_5,2 > succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_5,2) libGL-9.1.7_2 > succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_5) libdrm-2.4.52_1,1 > succeeds remote (remote has 2.4.17_2,1) linux-c6-atk-1.30.0 ? orphaned: accessibility/linux-c6-atk linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8 ? orphaned: graphics/linux-c6-cairo linux-c6-curl-7.19.7 ? orphaned: ftp/linux-c6-curl linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23 ? orphaned: security/linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2 linux-c6-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-c6-expat linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406 ? orphaned: www/linux-c6-flashplugin11 linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0 ? orphaned: x11-fonts/linux-c6-fontconfig linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1 ? orphaned: x11-toolkits/linux-c6-gtk2 linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1 ? orphaned: graphics/linux-c6-jpeg linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2 ? orphaned: security/linux-c6-libssh2 linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0 ? orphaned: devel/linux-c6-nspr linux-c6-nss-3.16.1 ? orphaned: security/linux-c6-nss linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23 ? orphaned: net/linux-c6-openldap linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e ? orphaned: security/linux-c6-openssl linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e ? orphaned: security/linux-c6-openssl-compat linux-c6-pango-1.28.1 ? orphaned: x11-toolkits/linux-c6-pango linux-c6-png-1.2.49 ? orphaned: graphics/linux-c6-png linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20 ? orphaned: databases/linux-c6-sqlite3 linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4 ? orphaned: graphics/linux-c6-tiff linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4 ? orphaned: x11/linux-c6-xorg-libs linux_base-c6-6.5_1 ? orphaned: emulators/linux_base-c6 tor-0.2.4.23_1 < needs updating (remote has 0.2.4.24) xdm-1.1.11_2 < needs updating (remote has 1.1.11_3) xf86-video-ati-7.2.0_4 > succeeds remote (remote has 6.14.6_4) xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_4 > succeeds remote (remote has 2.7.1_9) xorg-server-1.12.4_9,1 > succeeds remote (remote has 1.7.7_14,1) xterm-311 < needs updating (remote has 312) whew !!!! that took (35.935 cpu + 4.959 sys) sec., 1:03.52 elapsed time tot, 64.3% CPU efficiency (207 text, 2548 data, 46796 max) KB, (0+1071) io, 7261 pfs + 0 swaps [root@kabini1, /etc, 10:23:01am] 674 % Why are the linux-c6 pkg's listed as orphaned ? What does that mean ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 16:23:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDED915 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E68E9AB for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a108so5607332qge.40 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=Baq80kaLaUP5H7WPIfOxpGN8bv2mfE6CWlaptTrVXjA=; b=Ju4zZxdaLKTCdpuwPCvx/sK7AB4gYW9C+kNjpdzmXI/YQykoXQPDaP1fR7XWBFmbz4 Sp8dq2jbYcg0Azn2vkk7SIRLVS6+QGBorC6tfilfJeo080OAU1vZhWtn61YxWIWu3O1C Ixt8Tp7aK0RDUIg5kVNMi52AGEQxG+TyCJ2lf24zqmcCDzu6XDiuyA+6GQdTxPvFJkd9 k0qthQm7208T+7/Y1YycyYDVHwLpYMmxdP5Z4GvdX7E/36j1IE4ZGlkkTqR944epJDka uh0I4kBCYPT7/4Rlmg5l6/WSo6d30Ec8E86Cj/DAjbjApg7zwmbRfYR5RJ9hxigPnQ0Q WEmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkF9/X5W70GeByIJx+lTyzoDRkQxH+/zmIeEv2eF5M+XY+E94xNQ6GoQ9jQjbF3iWYZYstR MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.106.180 with SMTP id e49mr9303714qgf.75.1412698524287; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 09:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:15:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [66.220.121.156] Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:15:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pu6LcW7mB8r0yR5eP9dKGDvxAFM Message-ID: Subject: Re: geli not recognizing keyboard From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:23:43 -0000 > > > > > I did a fresh install with 10.1-BETA3 yesterday. I decided to encrypt > the > > boot partition using geli (only option given). > > > > The keyboard i have is a USB keyboard. The keyboard works fine in all > > scenarios except for when prompted with the geli password. > > > > http://i.minus.com/ibbw2T5C7Oppp5.jpg > > > > I tried with multiple different keyboards connected. Here's an Apple > > keyboard and a standard PC Roswill keyboard. > > > > There's no response at all from geli. > > > I just realized that I am seeing something similar that might be > related. I don't use geli, but my usb keyboard isn't recognized until > about halfway through the boot process. It works for BIOS setup and > after boot, but it doesn't work during the boot menu stage. I don't > know enough to know what the problem is, but that might help someone > else limit where the problem is. You might want to try a minimal > installation without geli and see if that is also true for you. If it > is the same problem, then it has been around for a while since mine is > running 9.1-RELEASE. My keyboard is actually a wireless usb one, but > that is probably no different than regular usb. > > I found a setting called "Port 60/64 Emulation which when disabled allowed me to enter the password for encryption. (Woo-hoo!) The description in the BIOS for this setting is: "Enables I/O Port 60h/64h emulation support" I also noticed that when I do a system halt, there is a prompt to press keyboard to reboot. That also didn't work with the way things work. So, it seems to me there's a fix related to this Port 60/64 that could be done on the OS side of things. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 17:31:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DB7C26 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward3m.mail.yandex.net (forward3m.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:2519::3:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D711FD for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23m.yandex.ru (web23m.yandex.ru [37.140.138.114]) by forward3m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B41AC6B60107 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:31:17 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23m.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2A6BC25A0604; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:31:17 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412703077; bh=rTvyYdCF+ffBDEvz46HTRpEjd+hIkxdbpQYkNLh/F64=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=mktxC1XrLVJxahK+9X679ftjbVndPEL0mEJXNIPwvnidpr6El6MMzH4cD4hjy+L0H oGdE7Ew2c+YJ4zrA6SF1QkfnBNBoXy3soh1du9gH5NAuz4tnbMu83SKOm0EOshz0pn Fsj0iegZzokRltvAYAGUW5S+LT7WPgv2UUAJuNwM= Received: from tsn109-201-154-210.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-154-210.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.154.210]) by web23m.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:31:16 +0400 From: Martin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <400341412703076@web23m.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:31:16 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:31:30 -0000 07.10.2014, 15:35, "Lowell Gilbert" : > Martin writes: >> šHowever, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. > > Is the export marked "insecure"? > You'll get different port numbers for root as opposed to a normal user. What does it mean "export marked as insecure"? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 18:39:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742BE8B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF9DC20 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3DC7E33C46; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:39:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Martin Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <400341412703076@web23m.yandex.ru> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:39:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <400341412703076@web23m.yandex.ru> (Martin's message of "Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:31:16 +0200") Message-ID: <44vbnvyba5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:39:32 -0000 Martin writes: > 07.10.2014, 15:35, "Lowell Gilbert" : >> Martin writes: >>> =A0However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user= , not root. >> >> Is the export marked "insecure"? >> You'll get different port numbers for root as opposed to a normal user. > > What does it mean "export marked as insecure"? Quoting the exports(5) manual page from a convenient Linux machine: EXAMPLE # sample /etc/exports file / master(rw) trusty(rw,no_root_squash) /projects proj*.local.domain(rw) /usr *.local.domain(ro) @trusted(rw) /home/joe pc001(rw,all_squash,anonuid=3D150,anongid=3D100) /pub *(ro,insecure,all_squash) /srv/www -sync,rw server @trusted @external(ro) /foo 2001:db8:9:e54::/64(rw) 192.0.2.0/24(rw) /build buildhost[0-9].local.domain(rw) The first line exports the entire filesystem to machines master and trusty. In addition to write access, all uid squashing is turned off for host trusty. The second and third entry show examples for wildcard hostnames and netgroups (this is the entry `@trusted'). The fourth line shows the entry for the PC/NFS client discussed above. Line 5 exports the public FTP directory to every host in the world, executing all requests under the nobody account. The insecure option in this entry also allows ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ clients with NFS implementations that don't use a reserved port for NFS. The sixth line exports a directory read-write to the machine 'server' as well as the `@trusted' netgroup, and read-only to netgroup `@external', all three mounts with the `sync' option enabled. The seventh line exports a directory to both an IPv6 and an IPv4 subnet. The eighth line demonstrates a character class wildcard match. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 18:48:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8B5E17 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92674D6B for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id 0JlY1p007516WCc01JlZd9; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:45:33 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OOap3EqB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=PBtdaOD29JoA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=oP9d-i4SEATyLlRkTmEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=nbKuPJACYY0A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XbZlK-0002F3-Tn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:45:31 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:45:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1950572.lZiIyjLTOo@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> References: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: oddball pkg output .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:48:45 -0000 On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 10:25:29 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Why are the linux-c6 pkg's listed as orphaned ? What does that mean > ? Because they haven't founf their way into the repository yet. >From https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-October/095767.html > The 2014Q4 branch has just been branched and the package builder has > been updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the > quarterly packages will be on the 2014Q4 branch [snip] -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 18:50:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00DACF9D for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87599D90 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id 0Jqc1p003516WCc01JqdsE; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:50:37 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OOap3EqB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=PBtdaOD29JoA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=oP9d-i4SEATyLlRkTmEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=nbKuPJACYY0A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XbZqE-0002FB-NM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:50:35 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:50:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1714383.25EES4ACxa@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> References: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: oddball pkg output .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:50:39 -0000 Sorry about the earlier incomplete post - pilot error led to accidental click on "send" :-( On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 10:25:29 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Why are the linux-c6 pkg's listed as orphaned ? What does that mean > ? Because they haven't found their way into the repository yet. >From https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-October/095767.html > The 2014Q4 branch has just been branched and the package builder has > been updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the > quarterly packages will be on the 2014Q4 branch [snip] > - Linux emulation can now use centos6 packages > Next package building will start on Wednesday 8th at 1 am and should > be available on your closest mirrors few days after that. So I expect we should see them in the repository by the start of next week. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 18:54:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECDA510C for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4ECE47 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so5986565qgf.35 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=rx+Yt2pWTEmCN0SDnaA6A++VAFiQLqR/U69+I8/s9No=; b=SzXcDB5BFifFAPButc0gifwyFyTKtq2MteW5HFzFq0dxBsC8wLkOaI6HUr60M3g3a2 68F7/8W47tRYwJWaiflvfUmLB7zGEE3viEK13OPfO9YDBue6JhR4IkWjhLgmK4NqSmlj GqOftmnPOD7P8bXaIjZoTm/uG8dcLGEBSLRIfqf+VXfZkph2MWkg5R/R4TC24NwKz/0D QHOZtZ/bDftAhiyH+FqcPGHqy1oh1p3dw1QdaCDJIoMCovbz/gdgBKxvx5zO8MFYFHAq eUaUx49kK+dha3EJ3kUlW2Tgo/TQXGO/ySF3du+mQqg/cX1mhsP1spqPQqEtF7zW8U8o 6IrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnt3wtyg1zXe8aU/+aBW+Yds/R2AjzQRKDfWrV+If/sfk8Bs1XzDcKOyawH1y7AyxeA0P9M MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.127.131 with SMTP id g3mr6960616qas.81.1412708068078; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [216.207.42.140] Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:54:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h-GdLPfVw9nKyxToQOIuJm5ZMmM Message-ID: Subject: No can boot From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:54:30 -0000 Summary: After an install and adding devices, I'm unable to boot. In order to not make any accidents with my valuable data, I removed two devices (geli/zfs) from the system. I installed FreeBSD freshly on my drive to get the geli/zfs configuration I desired. Once the install was finished, I booted from the drive to make sure everything worked. And so it did. I then added the two devices again and booted. This was met with a prompt of "mountroot>" and was unable to boot. How can I solve this? #freebsd mentioned using glabels but I'm unclear on how this is done, and because I'm using geli/zfs no one is entirely sure how. Help appreciated. -d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 18:56:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD391B6 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C773E67 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id i17so6420797qcy.13 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:55:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=WwCpNMboIeuUSshlgLLwcG8/qXyeipToRVL0IcqOCtk=; b=LYETuB8mFH+aG+zrJGLDeqoU8z54CaiqVOrFKH/StRqKZGj6+/MQeoCY+MhUYK1/rp sgJot5GAHZVFe2NWVpqwlV+j5wlRdKcwrDER5lc+h52a8cU7XeYpxNfrKhxaEr+LrEUO CympOk0W30c2hUamM2sK1NNCUN81MF9UOZ7DIj+y6y5W9X7yk725mh+B2eZ48FWPVsE3 WEfLWXoMtWGNR9cF8T0T+DQ92Be58sNwpVIdNUj2Vd4Sm57h1DKpErl4aGi3AyWxATnK hBdQic4yJmkASyiyuIoM85VQIUtvWooRmEVP/BHws44ODfjrFsxfWoz7RHCRcYNZ+bKr 0v4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkY4ku8syzuzCFOVVmmK15eNFCEKosDDRheeNHTAhblNSacIX2sA6XyZIePrcEV3fiNqZvX MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.20.9 with SMTP id d9mr6823474qab.7.1412708153383; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:55:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [216.207.42.140] Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:55:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DlwZ7AZZOaTVKPTwKrr9g5SFhu8 Message-ID: Subject: No can boot From: Daniel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:56:00 -0000 Summary: After an install and adding devices, I'm unable to boot. In order to not make any accidents with my valuable data, I removed two devices (geli/zfs) from the system. I installed FreeBSD freshly on my drive to get the geli/zfs configuration I desired. Once the install was finished, I booted from the drive to make sure everything worked. And so it did. I then added the two devices again and booted. This was met with a prompt of "mountroot>" and was unable to boot. How can I solve this? #freebsd mentioned using glabels but I'm unclear on how this is done, and because I'm using geli/zfs no one is entirely sure how. Help appreciated. -d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 19:02:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690FB2D9 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B024F54 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s97J2rYA000991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:02:54 -0500 Message-ID: <54343A54.3000503@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:09:08 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems accessing a Linux NFS share as a normal user References: <164141412651763@web23m.yandex.ru> <44sij0ypd3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <400341412703076@web23m.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <400341412703076@web23m.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:02:56 -0000 On 10/07/14 12:31, Martin wrote: > 07.10.2014, 15:35, "Lowell Gilbert" : >> Martin writes: >>> However, I also need to mount this on a FreeBSD box as a normal user, not root. >> Is the export marked "insecure"? >> You'll get different port numbers for root as opposed to a normal user. > What does it mean "export marked as insecure"? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > He means on the host (Debian) box .... That's what I was talking about in my last post :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 19:04:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A269138C for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53862F72 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s97J4L8M002090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:04:22 -0500 Message-ID: <54343AAC.9060909@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:10:36 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball pkg output .... References: <543405E9.2080808@hiwaay.net> <1950572.lZiIyjLTOo@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <1950572.lZiIyjLTOo@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:04:23 -0000 On 10/07/14 13:45, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 10:25:29 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Why are the linux-c6 pkg's listed as orphaned ? What does that mean >> ? > Because they haven't founf their way into the repository yet. > > >From https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-October/095767.html > >> The 2014Q4 branch has just been branched and the package builder has >> been updated to use that branch meaning that the next update on the >> quarterly packages will be on the 2014Q4 branch > [snip] > > *Boooyah* !!!! Thx :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 20:16:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE585DF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AACB9E3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wn1so6263491obc.37 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:16:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=POgS3zaCXlIIKphcSKpBPHD3fH6XhdwbsWyj0eAmI+Q=; b=deiilOLmj3KQ4poEivM8u/c7WziXowsPZB+py8+dVDFok1iG6mY/ZieW0SWWbptpSe w4CICSVcaSOVu5d9Q6CAFstySLEJIDzhwJqDlf9UDTV9Pkt4mwZ/t59T0dc4FyCniGg0 9k3fIz8HX3LhIKrWkeO8jytwonKUl2aqUvmFfWknCC2tpmZQHuhg9FI+5FCPa5TxRSq/ lFPimwzAcDEnHrjEVltYCzwET+dJyiXmgqRzHqWHbT1jz7Ji1wZx6ZJTA6H9eCKF+OvV 4Q7x3QOAejEK8X06FXlyDNfe6TXIm3+4n1HSjWsU9j/GcQW7m5/8xkJsSJy/QMCQRwLl EauQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.103.198 with SMTP id fy6mr7048848oeb.6.1412713000459; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.71.40 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:16:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Daemon aborting with signal 6 From: Tanuj Khurana To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:16:41 -0000 My server daemon process is crashing with signal 6. However, there is no abort() call in the stack trace in the generated core file. What could be the possible reasons why the process is aborting ? I am running Freebsd 7. Thanks, TJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 22:11:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DAF2883 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25FBA8BF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:11:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=TM9dhVO6/KQip/lDkilSulqW51z/HOfC1O/LYL1JaLA=; b=h4L9xkKhpOwOUN3b/XPzgTk8boMT07+rZ4mya0sH+9JZtsrdbiVFTsdaTKhT+ceo71IuPRo8JXw/2VdnU1McjEtewNezhAmSldu5nDu0nONBGw+WnAQ3eNMDTHH7bKSkPscRtuTwg6RhCwASGPax2QXp20/Kd2/eCdGnaKL6l7U=; Received: from [182.9.144.112] (port=42274 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbcyv-001yQr-9u; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:11:45 -0600 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 06:11:23 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Daniel Subject: Re: No can boot Message-ID: <20141008061123.090aa637@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:11:53 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:55:53 -0700 Daniel wrote: > I then added the two devices again and booted. This was met with a > prompt of "mountroot>" > > and > was unable to boot. > > How can I solve this? #freebsd mentioned using glabels but I'm > unclear on how this is done, and because I'm using geli/zfs no one is > entirely sure how. > MBR or GPT schema? You could use GPT labels with the GPT schema. You normally need to boot with a live CD as you are not able to label the partitions while they are in use. Label then the partitions. Edit /etc/fstab of your / Replace /dev/adaxxx with /dev/method/name Labels will show up in different directories. GLabels show up in label, GPT lables in gpt and UFS labels in ufs. So, you will have to use i.e. /dev/label/root for the root device, /dev/label/var for the var device and so on. No matter how FreeBSD assigns the drives now, you machine will boot now if your BIOS finds your drive. Erich > Help appreciated. > > -d > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 22:23:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCCEA33 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B429B1 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so9335638wib.5 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WOSGRM0YEux7Vck48AogxFxMnQcrtz3+mcf0ANGVP8Y=; b=TQDu8c8k2yKnZiTFXjtgR83oCYGTYWqRb/4jeG9mSoMaPmB0NnDDoW1lsmgnymS3UH E0kyxy5nLYbuS0z+Y0WSvFADfw3+3KvPh74Seoaz6e97ADNgp2MckVDJoQxeyauSPUIn zWEmtwGwZzBA4LTWZ82gEgC/XWzLVNgaou4uly877I5IIMsoq7NolAVb1igfUFwYyXwb jAniphdHNUYmjTBhUwDVUSdN6EgGiQ0HRVj2bvuVhX10DeZGKIRil9mIJahqUHoKMEcW A1Vjfnir2Ka7Wfxcm+e7qHArwoR3DFgTZsAfq5WXR95GiJuBDzR7okfwrdwmdTl/NjUq 7Mug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.47.134 with SMTP id d6mr8001571wjn.76.1412720608259; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.8 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.8 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:23:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Daemon aborting with signal 6 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Tanuj Khurana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:23:30 -0000 El 07/10/2014 22:17, "Tanuj Khurana" escribi=C3= =B3: > > My server daemon process is crashing with signal 6. However, there is no > abort() call in the stack trace in the generated core file. What could be > the possible reasons why the process is aborting ? I am running Freebsd 7= . Can you post the necklace from the core? > > Thanks, > TJ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 22:24:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF86AAC4 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772A99C2 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so9241326wiv.11 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vsuMMl16KjSE8PGm8OFiM8zH6ybAb9FpDC/x0lmqdE8=; b=Da1Djqh6Dwbi+OYCRDnm5cAJzFhi74anxKWTCyrAppccGnHWANs+BauF2QuaTMXQb+ 6DTU4hbWC/q4Ub8Khn0C6bhBhIhl4l7T/HRcy1oV8cq8O0AxBLN+0S/S/r6Mj6yJY0q5 g4dIcyzonv0k1jlf8zbDuyh0w2UZ2PphzhufmUz8vMshS+C//lMfsJ6A/u69ZIKtdnCP FZvuGYxQ8puzdlVhiL24Gdx5fBv8MfREwZQ92P1ydOnBOI8TgPtBn4JJdjYKBCNPDKXA k6YMBJJLB33mPv85HjAZ1Av0bE64gjqhfrTP0UcsGcV7qb4JIQl9FT6YntBhQf+tdlGO o23Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.38.114 with SMTP id f18mr7562968wik.24.1412720669681; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.8 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.8.8 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:24:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:24:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Daemon aborting with signal 6 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Tanuj Khurana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:24:32 -0000 El 08/10/2014 00:23, "Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa" escribi=C3=B3: > > > El 07/10/2014 22:17, "Tanuj Khurana" escribi=C3= =B3: > > > > > My server daemon process is crashing with signal 6. However, there is n= o > > abort() call in the stack trace in the generated core file. What could be > > the possible reasons why the process is aborting ? I am running Freebsd 7. > > Can you post the necklace from the core? I meant backtrace, but the predictive keyboard decided to be smart... > > > > > Thanks, > > TJ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 23:52:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C194B83E for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F7A36A for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id cm18so5016727qab.6 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N0Aizqaol423RDdgLGOPnVxYSg4xB2jNL8Wzqi+ZY34=; b=mO6MiKV7DHcDB6FO8Z5Vjg6cnRp4WO4w8vcS8rnwyzfsGI87mEjojBBPKijk2IDKbB vl3tQZ6skRsZJwzchiOTtZjA3Y2d7gE0sCk1skUNiBeRNHvkJ8ESRSE8seG1AtAuyU77 2xeSrsrDrEHnYcB4w7bt1ZTYytV+pjfuWE02fQKk92pWKnRpnCs0FLHrS0eDA41INhpR 2LUDlxB9rjLABNjF21A27dRs4aunkZ35a2SK9OZvwFpVHXtT6MtnA8f3mq2T0Q8wgsqN +gzx6MFmAdqSJP1CKIP0l4aeoGi1wDGriJJAV2CLmZ01wKFlx5OO4bBT2rlXwVP6Z8us 4y/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTxZ9BQ24lPPkPpY6w/ivg4XN+PcQi0JL9Pu0N+4QdT6juYYP2AFQTZds/+Ruq2z9BV3U5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.120.197 with SMTP id e5mr8626048qcr.9.1412725941154; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel@otherware.org Received: by 10.140.20.248 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [216.207.42.140] In-Reply-To: <20141008061123.090aa637@X220.alogt.com> References: <20141008061123.090aa637@X220.alogt.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:52:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VeKo5pGHxS_AA3Z6PA5m51bXank Message-ID: Subject: Re: No can boot From: Daniel To: Erich Dollansky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:52:28 -0000 > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Erich Dollansky < erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> wrote: Hi, thank you for answering > MBR or GPT schema? > > You could use GPT labels with the GPT schema. > GPT, and bsdinstaller has created labels for me. I ended up doing a reinstall and everything works even after adding devices now. Not sure what the problem was. > > You normally need to boot with a live CD as you are not able to label > the partitions while they are in use. > > Label then the partitions. > Edit /etc/fstab of your / > Replace /dev/adaxxx with /dev/method/name > Because it's ZFS on geli, there's not much of anything in /etc/fstab From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 01:48:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8957CBB8 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 01:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0BEF76 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 01:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id le20so5938122vcb.11 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:48:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ycombinator.com; s=google; h=date:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject:content-type; bh=bl6vN/OwMnup4Uy98PvJyXVAeFHbBQoJ7DWqoKN99xI=; b=i8X0GjWQEIFMySLVnqeUwoJLaZMANqlgU2EEANgzwUrx0t/AlFyzKc2E2keADtvDbo TYV58kgqz8LjWWobBWiJesCMbXh9lG/TEKOhA+1bv1kmU2OwZ/iB7YWy2cZlWEGiJ3TG AIWPmf/WimfjzK87TXkNEYm4NNAz2rgMeSDb4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:mime-version:message-id:from:to:subject :content-type; bh=bl6vN/OwMnup4Uy98PvJyXVAeFHbBQoJ7DWqoKN99xI=; b=d1g1vkZeiu/kVU8gqKhJsPT/FHoM0Q8IprllUwKoC/6tNK+IMBmcl0AO0DVfLdyj0K E7SM+K58GFPbx5aRSmiSD0wDspkp3q9AVItrzsY65wiZUh4bdoIBu9rBJLTgucCFvVC4 x2qqJqxre8/00t3YdinjijUiiGHqg3guX8CFQ6h6fllxyZ6Rjubm7HBGsi0o2Vz8tPiC d4JbBAXN6ZkJGzsRE25FKwcHgqXbytgiUJVhZjLg89CQvsPmU6FsX/M4TWE6RTIrecBT n6NJqLXsbkJrjYBi2bba0atC2yVOtgPQ/jxr3NvLUvXNlkRlUl5XTvRRMUitFL5na+49 9oGg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZ0eQj6xaTxrix14RkWRcf1ky3VfWpTvR8TwMM02QABwjb3q23/bcF5KQdzlv/l4OmdzsP X-Received: by 10.52.1.69 with SMTP id 5mr1347502vdk.86.1412732932263; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hedwig-35.prd.orcali.com (ec2-54-85-253-134.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [54.85.253.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm6477279vdi.27.2014.10.07.18.48.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 01:48:51 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Nodemailer (0.5.0; +http://www.nodemailer.com/) Message-Id: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> X-Orchestra-Oid: ED69F7B8-1734-40B2-BAEF-7BFB1F11FA3C X-Orchestra-Sig: ff4fd7a681b01de9fda898cf09b440ccc8abd1c8 X-Orchestra-Thrid: 380643E9-885F-4793-A609-B809C37F88EE X-Orchestra-Thrid-Sig: e08933f784f1cf639017239417199d91757ee807 X-Orchestra-Account: 528163f51839e26a114bb1b287609bd1929bd590 From: "Nick Sivo" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 01:48:53 -0000 Hello, I've been having trouble with ZFS on my server. For the most part it works = splendidly, but occasionally I'll experience permanent hangs. For example, right now on one of my ZFS filesystems (the others are fine), = I can read, write, and stat files, but if I run ls in any directory, ls and= the terminal will hang. CTRL-C, and kill -9 can't kill it: In top: =C2=A0 PID USERNAME=C2=A0 =C2=A0 THR PRI NICE =C2=A0 SIZE=C2=A0 =C2=A0 RES = STATE =C2=A0 C =C2=A0 TIME =C2=A0 WCPU COMMAND =C2=A05868 nsivo =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1=C2=A0 20=C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 = 14456K=C2=A0 1016K zfs =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 =C2=A0 0:00=C2=A0 0.00% ls In ps: USER=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PID=C2=A0 %CPU %MEM =C2=A0 =C2=A0 VSZ =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 RSS TT=C2=A0 STAT STARTED=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 TIME COMMAND nsivo=C2=A0 =C2=A0 5868 =C2=A0 0.0=C2=A0 0.0 =C2=A0 14456=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 1016=C2=A0 2- D+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 2:35PM =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0:00.00 ls Eventually the entire system hangs, and can't be shutdown cleanly. What are the next steps to debug this=3F I'm a software developer, but am = not familiar with kernel debugging. Is there a way to discover in which = syscall ls is stuck=3F Ideally without requiring a crash dump=3F Thanks for reading, Nick -Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 02:54:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0403E170 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5EF080D for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 02:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s982suZK018037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:54:56 -0500 Message-ID: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:01:11 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: oddball syslog entries .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 02:54:59 -0000 Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my messages file: Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-jpeg-6b deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2 deinstalled Oct 2 09:32:21 kabini1 pkg: linux_base-f10-10_7 deinstalled Oct 2 09:35:47 kabini1 pkg-static: linux_base-c6-6.5_1 installed Oct 2 09:39:50 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-atk-1.30.0 installed Oct 2 09:39:51 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-expat-2.0.1 installed Oct 2 09:39:52 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0 installed Oct 2 09:39:53 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-png-1.2.49 installed Oct 2 09:39:55 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4 installed Oct 2 09:39:56 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8 installed Oct 2 09:39:58 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e installed Oct 2 09:39:59 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2 installed Oct 2 09:40:00 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23 installed Oct 2 09:40:01 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-curl-7.19.7 installed Oct 2 09:40:04 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1 installed Oct 2 09:40:05 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-pango-1.28.1 installed Oct 2 09:40:06 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4 installed Oct 2 09:40:07 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1 installed Oct 2 09:40:09 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e installed Oct 2 09:40:10 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23 installed Oct 2 09:40:11 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0 installed Oct 2 09:40:18 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20 installed Oct 2 09:40:19 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nss-3.16.1 installed Oct 2 09:40:20 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406 installed Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 to 200 packets/sec Oct 5 11:30:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 to 200 packets/sec Oct 5 11:30:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 to 200 packets/sec Oct 5 11:30:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 10:41:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 10:41:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 10:41:27 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 10:41:29 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 14:59:41 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 14:59:42 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 14:59:44 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 14:59:45 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 14:59:47 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 15:03:18 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 15:03:20 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 15:03:21 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 to 200 packets/sec Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 to 200 packets/sec The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. The lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are they coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... TIA for any clues .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 03:01:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFC4371 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 03:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB0F977 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 03:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so6045828vcb.3 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LkBP7VK4LeF2B/A9mVnHbJjtwyp3nLu54UBUR1azp7I=; b=lVi+dk4rrUAkinJmEtbi6p3HQhVyiQohglfYSJ1SL9vfvl1oZxAN3ydRtyJThXg49L 3ZkEe58kuqCID0PRW/uH1Rj+UCr6gFuuhbl31EzKcX9YrS4l9I4vuaSX4VInJGcqP+4k dWISq4MA2N1XezPFiuj77Fmr14jzUCA1xRdfYgLJDnK+4hjo183lYOtAiiX2VfsIii+t 4bQAcMwl1CU5Pl75w0BzEZ1fF6Nz52BDEMM/p+sW4TP8u7B9AHSNqyO39uPcw2ycbLKH nq6sPOQRWAjxur3IhXuiXH2dUfGocW8RygaN0NYwpYcRh1Jx5sH39MVjAWncjufxlSvd frrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.195.196 with SMTP id ed4mr2721359vcb.59.1412737298585; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.248.202 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:01:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:01:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... From: Kurt Buff To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 03:01:39 -0000 AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine behind a router/firewall? Kurt On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my > messages file: > > > Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-jpeg-6b deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:32:21 kabini1 pkg: linux_base-f10-10_7 deinstalled > Oct 2 09:35:47 kabini1 pkg-static: linux_base-c6-6.5_1 installed > Oct 2 09:39:50 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-atk-1.30.0 installed > Oct 2 09:39:51 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-expat-2.0.1 installed > Oct 2 09:39:52 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0 installed > Oct 2 09:39:53 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-png-1.2.49 installed > Oct 2 09:39:55 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4 installed > Oct 2 09:39:56 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8 installed > Oct 2 09:39:58 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e installed > Oct 2 09:39:59 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2 installed > Oct 2 09:40:00 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23 installed > Oct 2 09:40:01 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-curl-7.19.7 installed > Oct 2 09:40:04 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1 installed > Oct 2 09:40:05 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-pango-1.28.1 installed > Oct 2 09:40:06 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4 installed > Oct 2 09:40:07 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1 installed > Oct 2 09:40:09 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e installed > Oct 2 09:40:10 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23 installed > Oct 2 09:40:11 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0 installed > Oct 2 09:40:18 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20 installed > Oct 2 09:40:19 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nss-3.16.1 installed > Oct 2 09:40:20 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406 > installed > Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:27 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:29 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:41 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:42 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:44 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:45 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:47 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:18 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:20 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:21 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 > to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 > to 200 packets/sec > > The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. The > lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are they > coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... TIA > for any clues .... > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 03:08:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD4D54B for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 03:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5D79E1 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 03:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-6.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9838pIR021915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:08:51 -0500 Message-ID: <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:15:06 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 03:08:53 -0000 On 10/07/14 22:01, Kurt Buff wrote: > AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. > > What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected > to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine > behind a router/firewall? > > Kurt > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >> messages file: >> >> >> Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:18 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-jpeg-6b deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:19 kabini1 pkg: linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:32:21 kabini1 pkg: linux_base-f10-10_7 deinstalled >> Oct 2 09:35:47 kabini1 pkg-static: linux_base-c6-6.5_1 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:50 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-atk-1.30.0 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:51 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-expat-2.0.1 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:52 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:53 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-png-1.2.49 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:55 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:56 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8 installed >> Oct 2 09:39:58 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e installed >> Oct 2 09:39:59 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:00 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:01 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-curl-7.19.7 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:04 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:05 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-pango-1.28.1 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:06 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:07 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:09 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e installed >> Oct 2 09:40:10 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:11 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:18 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:19 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-nss-3.16.1 installed >> Oct 2 09:40:20 kabini1 pkg-static: linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406 >> installed >> Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 276 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 239 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:27 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 280 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:29 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 319 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:41 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:42 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:44 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:45 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:47 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:18 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 253 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:20 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 233 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:21 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 265 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 295 >> to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 324 >> to 200 packets/sec >> >> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. The >> lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are they >> coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... TIA >> for any clues .... >> >> >> -- >> >> William A. Mahaffey III >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >> ever devised by man." >> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > SOHO, behind a 2-bit firewall device. I used to have a IPCop box, but it croaked a while back. I have a fair amount of firewalling active on this box, derived from the stock ipfw file, w/ a few mods for NFS, & that's it. I am seeing nothing on other boxen on my LAN, FWIW .... Suggested course of action ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 04:11:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D99BFC6 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 04:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E210F57 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 04:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id la4so6068863vcb.13 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7Opxr/viu6S2U6d4nqVzAft1q/R5h2VATyNP/RoqOcs=; b=OsYGkD6WvuAC+ucMO8XjQgqMZSI3rxvcS6fkcC3YGQcVfj02IaBl//3+W91jgjBDAV eR9x9JTTvXkDqBto5jsUT/UJiK1ZZGrbOqyEpaXgwZuPoAXEVaMpe5bi51XwijusqR0T 20IqYTEUbIBaSHzGFegCbkENK8Ep95oBMTC5fdxx7R95tbbRvoDk2lRqXeGreEsUk6gh x/4HfeUUPVq0P0FpO8o69jKFEHr8HzIUqKIFK19+ryqw1ZjIygrqVY0ZvxBpl86WagE7 luiyBLtdeiGadGcOJ5it6CwzWFgUPNgrXsQ9BD5xAWnH49CiOkANfKIhaP/2y3LaqfFn rULQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.253.39 with SMTP id zx7mr6313685vdc.2.1412741487276; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.248.202 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:11:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... From: Kurt Buff To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:11:28 -0000 edited the message for clarity... On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:15 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/07/14 22:01, Kurt Buff wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >>> messages file: >>> >>> >>> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>> 295 >>> to 200 packets/sec >>> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>> 324 >>> to 200 packets/sec >>> >>> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >>> The >>> lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are >>> they >>> coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... >>> TIA >>> for any clues .... >>> >> >> AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. >> >> What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected >> to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine >> behind a router/firewall? >> >> Kurt >> > SOHO, behind a 2-bit firewall device. I used to have a IPCop box, but it > croaked a while back. I have a fair amount of firewalling active on this > box, derived from the stock ipfw file, w/ a few mods for NFS, & that's it. I > am seeing nothing on other boxen on my LAN, FWIW .... Suggested course of > action ? I'd approach this with tcpdump, and wireshark. Assuming you have only one NIC (em0) on this machine, I'd set up something like this as root in a separate terminal/ssh session: tcpdump -npi em0 -C 1 -w /root/dumps/banger.pcap -W 100 This sets up a ring buffer where you'll get a maximum of 100 files of 1,000,000 bytes each. Then, when you note those odd messages again, you'll be able to stop the capture and correlate the time stamps of the messages and the tcpdump capture files. Examining the capture files with wireshark should make offending address(es) and/or port(s) stand out like a sore thumb. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 05:08:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00017D52 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBB0639 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so6069140vcb.17 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ycombinator.com; s=google; h=date:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; bh=O41Ppyf7cap9BxrjlGgcHEmxQjpyLEKNNMeb4Pwqv9s=; b=W3ZT0GPnA9R9O56Glc4ahML1xgxgJ7QbldrUkf6eRwRHS9B3irtZiviYPGxmNRJfxj 2GswYao4RKHh6M3XhZi/SDluAaItszkgqpXjQ4xEWB3Yyj4tJpbIX9AHyEzIAHPBnZ4B nqGzJJljhmvONvHPQO11sBP7GfJOvf8ScFGVE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:from:to:cc:subject:content-type; bh=O41Ppyf7cap9BxrjlGgcHEmxQjpyLEKNNMeb4Pwqv9s=; b=NsCSytN8/I3gJ7S+Q7nri51PGalWsHkV1s+rP1FkzxnNtgTTcXExFdWlG1aG/FRFn3 C3ETDklKMyMyvyzG2t0+IS+z7QJJoGZKD5TXzOa4WXrgpsXFZ1/KuS9MaDtVvCLMBP8d 0eIPw5Kht+Q14g+wxWQOxjPQaNTxTZihYQHKAsyfubuhIXIE/VD0QkDuu16WzJ9aScG7 CmxbRg65mNpyzUyUPRhZfJFZvuPWPXs0qlw5Km6j7m7HYTnzXibcnj9TXbv/fNnttdwN IzwGGCF/mtawNDl1zrUuasWqMSI3NPnH/LAIwGkAaYMb1VbnwRrlPmJ3MXRJ+yXivcie LG4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlGQmDiFAe9+RbqAcfyZ9/cnF0DC65mJ/wMU1JfT0qLa0boQdT801KJoYY9z/fKE52lvirE X-Received: by 10.52.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr5384172vdc.82.1412744930554; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hedwig-35.prd.orcali.com (ec2-54-85-253-134.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [54.85.253.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm6824407vdi.11.2014.10.07.22.08.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:08:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:08:48 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Nodemailer (0.5.0; +http://www.nodemailer.com/) Message-Id: <1412744928839.435cc5fe@Nodemailer> In-Reply-To: <36D4252F-3DF1-4321-9C6F-3779062B82F0@shire.net> References: <36D4252F-3DF1-4321-9C6F-3779062B82F0@shire.net> X-Orchestra-Oid: 821BAC73-DA06-48B8-B976-70F9AAD337F0 X-Orchestra-Sig: 3d915bebcce2612413075580ee5ea545edab12fd X-Orchestra-Thrid: 380643E9-885F-4793-A609-B809C37F88EE X-Orchestra-Thrid-Sig: e08933f784f1cf639017239417199d91757ee807 X-Orchestra-Account: d5c140aa6513b58e04a56fc952ee7c3deb1d7845 From: "Nick Sivo" To: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:08:52 -0000 Thanks Chad. I looked through 20 pages of google search results restricted = to the archives of this list, and didn't see anything I could tell was = related to the problem I'm having. It's not a complete IO stall, or even a = pool-wide stall. It's only for listing directory contents of a single = filesystem, which is why I'm baffled. The pool is less that 40% utilized, ARC isn't under memory pressure, and as= far as I can tell everything should be fine. I did find: https://wiki.freebsd.org/AvgZfsDeadlockDebug which confirms I = want kernel stack traces. I was hoping to get some guidance on that, = especially on a remote system with only SSH access. Not sure I can just = enter DDB over SSH. Maybe tricks with dtrace and stack()=3F [nsivo@hn3 sysutils]$ zpool get all ssd | grep -v default NAME=C2=A0 PROPERTY=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 VALUE =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 SOURCE ssd =C2=A0 size=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 182G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 capacity=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 38% =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 health=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ONLINE=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 failmode=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 panic =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 dedupratio=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 1.00x =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 free=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 111G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 allocated =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 70.7G =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 readonly=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 off =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 expandsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 feature@async=5Fdestroy =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 enabled =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 feature@empty=5Fbpobj =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 active=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 feature@lz4=5Fcompress=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 enabled =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 unsupported@com.joyent:multi=5Fvdev=5Fcrash=5Fdump=C2=A0 = inactive=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = local [nsivo@hn3 sysutils]$ zfs get all | grep ssd | grep -v default | grep -v = 'arc@2' ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = type=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = filesystem =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = creation=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Thu Aug 28 16:33 = 2014=C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = used=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 70.= 7G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = available =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 108G =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = referenced=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 144K =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = compressratio =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1.00x=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = mounted =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 no =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = mountpoint=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 none =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = checksum=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sha256 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 atime= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 off=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = canmount=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 off=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = version =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = utf8only=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 on =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = normalization =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 formKC =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = casesensitivity =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sensitive=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbysnapshots =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbydataset =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 144K =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbychildren=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 70.7G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbyrefreservation=C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = mlslabel =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = refcompressratio=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1.00x=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = written =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 144K =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = logicalused =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 31.1G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = logicalreferenced =C2=A0 =C2=A0 43.5K=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 type=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 filesystem =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = creation=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Wed Sep 17 17:07 = 2014=C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 used=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 70.5G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 available = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 108G =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = referenced=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 47.8G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = compressratio =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1.00x=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mounted = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 yes=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = mountpoint=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 /usr/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 received ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = checksum=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sha256 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 inherited from ssd ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 atime =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 off=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 inherited from ssd ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 setuid=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 off=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 received ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 snapdir = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 visible=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 received ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 xattr =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 off=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 temporary ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 version = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = utf8only=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 on =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = normalization =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 formKC =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = casesensitivity =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sensitive=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbysnapshots =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 22.7G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbydataset =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 47.8G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbychildren=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = usedbyrefreservation=C2=A0 0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mlslabel = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 sync=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 always =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 local ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = refcompressratio=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1.00x=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 written = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 262M =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 logicalused = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 31.0G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - ssd/arc =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = logicalreferenced =C2=A0 =C2=A0 15.3G=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - [nsivo@hn3 ~]$ zfs-stats -a ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ZFS Subsystem Report Tue Oct=C2=A0 7 21:58:37 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ System Information: Kernel Version: 902001 (osreldate) Hardware Platform: amd64 Processor Architecture: amd64 ZFS Storage pool Version: 5000 ZFS Filesystem Version: 5 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p12 #0: Mon Sep 15 18:46:46 UTC 2014 root =C2=A09:58PM=C2=A0 up 16 days,=C2=A0 3:39, 2 users, load averages: 0.24, 0.= 33, 0.35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ System Memory: 16.80% 10.42 GiB Active, 0.15% 94.19 MiB Inact 72.82% 45.15 GiB Wired, 0.12% 74.04 MiB Cache 10.11% 6.27 GiB Free, 0.00% 2.46 MiB Gap Real Installed: 64.00 GiB Real Available: 99.91% 63.94 GiB Real Managed: 96.97% 62.00 GiB Logical Total: 64.00 GiB Logical Used: 89.95% 57.56 GiB Logical Free: 10.05% 6.44 GiB Kernel Memory: 15.70 GiB Data: 99.83% 15.67 GiB Text: 0.17% 27.37 MiB Kernel Memory Map: 52.92 GiB Size: 21.21% 11.22 GiB Free: 78.79% 41.69 GiB ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ARC Summary: (HEALTHY) Memory Throttle Count: 0 ARC Misc: Deleted: 500.41m Recycle Misses: 270.90m Mutex Misses: 27.63m Evict Skips: 5.12b ARC Size: 25.95% 15.83 GiB Target Size: (Adaptive) 45.64% 27.84 GiB Min Size (Hard Limit): 12.50% 7.63 GiB Max Size (High Water): 8:1 61.00 GiB ARC Size Breakdown: Recently Used Cache Size: 10.56% 2.94 GiB Frequently Used Cache Size: 89.44% 24.91 GiB ARC Hash Breakdown: Elements Max: 16.33m Elements Current: 20.84% 3.40m Collisions: 571.54m Chain Max: 41 Chains: 750.10k ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ARC Efficiency: 4.77b Cache Hit Ratio: 81.44% 3.88b Cache Miss Ratio: 18.56% 884.45m Actual Hit Ratio: 80.36% 3.83b Data Demand Efficiency: 29.50% 966.53m Data Prefetch Efficiency: 29.08% 21.22m CACHE HITS BY CACHE LIST: =C2=A0 Most Recently Used: 3.47% 134.64m =C2=A0 Most Frequently Used: 95.20% 3.69b =C2=A0 Most Recently Used Ghost: 5.18% 200.94m =C2=A0 Most Frequently Used Ghost: 5.58% 216.52m CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE: =C2=A0 Demand Data: 7.35% 285.16m =C2=A0 Prefetch Data: 0.16% 6.17m =C2=A0 Demand Metadata: 90.91% 3.53b =C2=A0 Prefetch Metadata: 1.58% 61.40m CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE: =C2=A0 Demand Data: 77.04% 681.37m =C2=A0 Prefetch Data: 1.70% 15.05m =C2=A0 Demand Metadata: 15.86% 140.24m =C2=A0 Prefetch Metadata: 5.40% 47.79m ------------------------------------------------------------------------ L2ARC is disabled ------------------------------------------------------------------------ File-Level Prefetch: (HEALTHY) DMU Efficiency: 11.05b Hit Ratio: 59.82% 6.61b Miss Ratio: 40.18% 4.44b Colinear: 4.44b =C2=A0 Hit Ratio: 0.01% 317.87k =C2=A0 Miss Ratio: 99.99% 4.44b Stride: 6.62b =C2=A0 Hit Ratio: 99.57% 6.59b =C2=A0 Miss Ratio: 0.43% 28.41m DMU Misc: Reclaim: 4.44b =C2=A0 Successes: 0.81% 35.91m =C2=A0 Failures: 99.19% 4.40b Streams: 16.54m =C2=A0 +Resets: 0.25% 41.20k =C2=A0 -Resets: 99.75% 16.50m =C2=A0 Bogus: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ VDEV cache is disabled ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ZFS Tunables (sysctl): kern.maxusers =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 384 vm.kmem=5Fsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 66575511552 vm.kmem=5Fsize=5Fscale=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vm.kmem=5Fsize=5Fmin=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vm.kmem=5Fsize=5Fmax=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 329853485875 vfs.zfs.l2c=5Fonly=5Fsize =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fghost=5Fdata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 483016704 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fghost=5Fmetadata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 1192360960 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fghost=5Fsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1675377664 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fdata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3821800448 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fmetadata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 1144714240 vfs.zfs.mfu=5Fsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 9304926208 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fghost=5Fdata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 7731420672 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fghost=5Fmetadata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 19021883392 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fghost=5Fsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 26753304064 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fdata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1530433536 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fmetadata=5Flsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 390488064 vfs.zfs.mru=5Fsize=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3144110080 vfs.zfs.anon=5Fdata=5Flsize =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.anon=5Fmetadata=5Flsize =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 0 vfs.zfs.anon=5Fsize =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 12001792 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Fnorw=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Ffeed=5Fagain=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Fnoprefetch=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Ffeed=5Fmin=5Fms =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 200 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Ffeed=5Fsecs =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Fheadroom=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Fwrite=5Fboost =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 8388608 vfs.zfs.l2arc=5Fwrite=5Fmax =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 8388608 vfs.zfs.arc=5Fmeta=5Flimit=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 16375442432 vfs.zfs.arc=5Fmeta=5Fused =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 11641238168 vfs.zfs.arc=5Fmin =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 8187721216 vfs.zfs.arc=5Fmax =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 65501769728 vfs.zfs.dedup.prefetch=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.mdcomp=5Fdisable=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.nopwrite=5Fenabled=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.write=5Flimit=5Foverride=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 0 vfs.zfs.write=5Flimit=5Finflated=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 205969035264 vfs.zfs.write=5Flimit=5Fmax =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 8582043136 vfs.zfs.write=5Flimit=5Fmin =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 33554432 vfs.zfs.write=5Flimit=5Fshift =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 3 vfs.zfs.no=5Fwrite=5Fthrottle =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.zfetch.array=5Frd=5Fsz=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 1048576 vfs.zfs.zfetch.block=5Fcap=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 256 vfs.zfs.zfetch.min=5Fsec=5Freap =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 2 vfs.zfs.zfetch.max=5Fstreams=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 8 vfs.zfs.prefetch=5Fdisable=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.no=5Fscrub=5Fprefetch =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.no=5Fscrub=5Fio =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.resilver=5Fmin=5Ftime=5Fms=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 3000 vfs.zfs.free=5Fmin=5Ftime=5Fms=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1000 vfs.zfs.scan=5Fmin=5Ftime=5Fms=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1000 vfs.zfs.scan=5Fidle =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 50 vfs.zfs.scrub=5Fdelay =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 4 vfs.zfs.resilver=5Fdelay=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2 vfs.zfs.top=5Fmaxinflight =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 32 vfs.zfs.write=5Fto=5Fdegraded =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.mg=5Falloc=5Ffailures =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 8 vfs.zfs.check=5Fhostid=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.deadman=5Fenabled =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.deadman=5Fsynctime=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 1000 vfs.zfs.recover =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.txg.synctime=5Fms =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 1000 vfs.zfs.txg.timeout =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.bshift =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= 16 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.size =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.vdev.cache.max=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 16384 vfs.zfs.vdev.trim=5Fon=5Finit =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.vdev.write=5Fgap=5Flimit=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 4096 vfs.zfs.vdev.read=5Fgap=5Flimit =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 32768 vfs.zfs.vdev.aggregation=5Flimit=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 131072 vfs.zfs.vdev.ramp=5Frate=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2 vfs.zfs.vdev.time=5Fshift =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 29 vfs.zfs.vdev.min=5Fpending=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 4 vfs.zfs.vdev.max=5Fpending=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 10 vfs.zfs.vdev.bio=5Fdelete=5Fdisable =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.vdev.bio=5Fflush=5Fdisable=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.vdev.trim=5Fmax=5Fpending =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 64 vfs.zfs.vdev.trim=5Fmax=5Fbytes =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 2147483648 vfs.zfs.cache=5Fflush=5Fdisable =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 0 vfs.zfs.zil=5Freplay=5Fdisable=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.sync=5Fpass=5Frewrite =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 2 vfs.zfs.sync=5Fpass=5Fdont=5Fcompress =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5 vfs.zfs.sync=5Fpass=5Fdeferred=5Ffree =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2 vfs.zfs.zio.use=5Fuma =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.snapshot=5Flist=5Fprefetch=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.version.ioctl =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3 vfs.zfs.version.zpl =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5 vfs.zfs.version.spa =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 5000 vfs.zfs.version.acl =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.debug =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.super=5Fowner =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0 vfs.zfs.trim.enabled=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.trim.max=5Finterval =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 1 vfs.zfs.trim.timeout=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 30 vfs.zfs.trim.txg=5Fdelay=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -Nick On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Oct 7, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Nick Sivo wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >>=20 >> I've been having trouble with ZFS on my server. For the most part it = works splendidly, but occasionally I'll experience permanent hangs. >>=20 >>=20 >> For example, right now on one of my ZFS filesystems (the others are = fine), I can read, write, and stat files, but if I run ls in any directory,= ls and the terminal will hang. CTRL-C, and kill -9 can't kill it: >>=20 > How much free space do you have=3F (percentage wise). I found out (and = have had others confirm) that when you get below a certain amount of free = space you can get these symptoms (which percentage may vary per system and = how the zfs config is set up [kernel parameters]). > Also, depending on what you are doing the various parameters may need to = be tweaked. Look in the archives for similar posts (including from me). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 05:13:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01521DFE for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.shire.net [199.102.78.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65AE6DF for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-50-160-104-83.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([50.160.104.83] helo=[192.168.99.207]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1XbifI-0004r6-El; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:15:52 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:15:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <36D4252F-3DF1-4321-9C6F-3779062B82F0@shire.net> References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> To: Nick Sivo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 50.160.104.83 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:13:23 -0000 On Oct 7, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Nick Sivo wrote: > Hello, >=20 >=20 > I've been having trouble with ZFS on my server. For the most part it = works splendidly, but occasionally I'll experience permanent hangs. >=20 >=20 > For example, right now on one of my ZFS filesystems (the others are = fine), I can read, write, and stat files, but if I run ls in any = directory, ls and the terminal will hang. CTRL-C, and kill -9 can't kill = it: >=20 How much free space do you have? (percentage wise). I found out (and = have had others confirm) that when you get below a certain amount of = free space you can get these symptoms (which percentage may vary per = system and how the zfs config is set up [kernel parameters]). Also, depending on what you are doing the various parameters may need to = be tweaked. Look in the archives for similar posts (including from me). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 07:42:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CDB267 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E5E6D5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s987MEAa082055; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:22:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:22:14 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:42:35 -0000 On 08/10/2014 04:01, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my > messages file: > > [irrelevance snipped] > Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 276 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 239 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 280 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 5 11:30:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 319 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 276 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 239 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:27 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 280 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 10:41:29 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 319 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:41 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 253 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:42 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 233 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:44 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 265 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:45 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 295 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 14:59:47 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 324 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:18 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 253 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:20 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 233 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:21 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 265 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 295 to 200 packets/sec > Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from > 324 to 200 packets/sec > > The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. > The lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where > are they coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know > ;-) .... TIA for any clues .... > > I occasionally get this on a machine that sits squarely behind a locked down pfSense firewall. If you want to see what's causing it, sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=1 (put into your /etc/sysctl.conf if you want it to last over reboots.) This will show you where the packet came from and which port on your machine was the target. In my case it seemed to be a mix of DNS responses from the outside world that arrived too late and a local long running Firefox occasionally pounding on the indent port (113) for no good reason I ever discovered. Nothing seems particularly dubious, unless the DNS responses were attempted spoofs, but my ISP is one of the better UK ones and I'd expect them to mitigate such attacks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 13:27:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41536B2B for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05BD0EA1 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-88.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98DRnxi015308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:27:50 -0500 Message-ID: <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:34:04 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:27:59 -0000 On 10/07/14 23:11, Kurt Buff wrote: > edited the message for clarity... > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:15 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 10/07/14 22:01, Kurt Buff wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >>>> messages file: >>>> >>>> > > >>>> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>> 295 >>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>> 324 >>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>> >>>> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >>>> The >>>> lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are >>>> they >>>> coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... >>>> TIA >>>> for any clues .... >>>> >>> AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. >>> >>> What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected >>> to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine >>> behind a router/firewall? >>> >>> Kurt >>> > > >> SOHO, behind a 2-bit firewall device. I used to have a IPCop box, but it >> croaked a while back. I have a fair amount of firewalling active on this >> box, derived from the stock ipfw file, w/ a few mods for NFS, & that's it. I >> am seeing nothing on other boxen on my LAN, FWIW .... Suggested course of >> action ? > I'd approach this with tcpdump, and wireshark. > > Assuming you have only one NIC (em0) on this machine, I'd set up > something like this as root in a separate terminal/ssh session: > > tcpdump -npi em0 -C 1 -w /root/dumps/banger.pcap -W 100 > > This sets up a ring buffer where you'll get a maximum of 100 files of > 1,000,000 bytes each. > > Then, when you note those odd messages again, you'll be able to stop > the capture and correlate the time stamps of the messages and the > tcpdump capture files. Examining the capture files with wireshark > should make offending address(es) and/or port(s) stand out like a sore > thumb. > > Kurt > Hmmmmm .... OK. I had neither wireshark or tcpdump installed, so I did a pkg install as such, which begat another problem: [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:21:10am] 699 % pkg install -y wireshark tcpdump Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100% 968 B 1.0k/s 00:01 Fetching digests.txz: 100% 68 kB 69.7k/s 00:01 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 189 kB 193.5k/s 00:01 Removing expired repository entries: 100% Processing new repository entries: 100% FreeBSD_new_xorg repository update completed. 781 packages processed: 381 updated, 6 removed and 14 added. Updating database digests format: 100% New version of pkg detected; it needs to be installed first. The following 1 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: pkg: 1.3.8_2 -> 1.3.8_3 [FreeBSD_new_xorg] 2 MB to be downloaded. Fetching pkg-1.3.8_3.txz: 100% 2 MB 226.3k/s 00:09 Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.3.8_2 to 1.3.8_3: 100% Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 19 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] linux_base-f10: 10_7 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] gtk3: 3.8.8_1 [FreeBSD] colord: 1.0.1_3 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-atk: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-core: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] libsmi: 0.4.8_1 [FreeBSD] adns: 1.4_2 [FreeBSD] tcpdump: 4.5.1 [FreeBSD] The process will require 303 MB more space. 44 MB to be downloaded. Fetching wireshark-1.12.1.txz: 100% 14 MB 365.8k/s 00:40 Fetching linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1.txz: 100% 1 MB 317.0k/s 00:05 Fetching linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1.txz: 100% 118 kB 121.2k/s 00:01 Fetching linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1.txz: 100% 65 kB 67.2k/s 00:01 Fetching linux_base-f10-10_7.txz: 100% 16 MB 363.2k/s 00:48 Fetching linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1.txz: 100% 274 kB 281.5k/s 00:01 Fetching linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5.txz: 100% 3 MB 351.1k/s 00:09 Fetching linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2.txz: 100% 241 kB 247.7k/s 00:01 Fetching linux-f10-jpeg-6b.txz: 100% 115 kB 118.2k/s 00:01 Fetching linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1.txz: 100% 143 kB 146.4k/s 00:01 Fetching gtk3-3.8.8_1.txz: 100% 5 MB 343.2k/s 00:16 Fetching colord-1.0.1_3.txz: 100% 409 kB 419.3k/s 00:01 Fetching at-spi2-atk-2.8.0_1.txz: 100% 56 kB 58.3k/s 00:01 Fetching at-spi2-core-2.8.0_1.txz: 100% 213 kB 218.2k/s 00:01 Fetching libsmi-0.4.8_1.txz: 100% 1 MB 334.4k/s 00:06 Fetching adns-1.4_2.txz: 100% 103 kB 105.5k/s 00:01 Fetching tcpdump-4.5.1.txz: 100% 305 kB 312.7k/s 00:01 Checking integrity... done (11 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Conflicts with the existing packages have been found. One more solver iteration is needed to resolve them. The following 40 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REMOVED: linux_base-c6-6.5_1 linux-c6-expat-2.0.1 linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0 linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4 linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406 linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1 linux-c6-pango-1.28.1 linux-c6-curl-7.19.7 linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8 linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4 linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2 linux-c6-nss-3.16.1 linux-c6-atk-1.30.0 linux-c6-png-1.2.49 linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1 linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23 linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23 linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0 linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20 New packages to be INSTALLED: linux_base-f10: 10_7 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-expat: 2.0.1_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-fontconfig: 2.6.0_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-png: 1.2.37_2 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-core: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-cairo: 1.8.0_3 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-jpeg: 6b [FreeBSD] colord: 1.0.1_3 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-atk: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-pango: 1.28.3_1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-tiff: 3.8.2 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-atk: 1.24.0_1 [FreeBSD] gtk3: 3.8.8_1 [FreeBSD] libsmi: 0.4.8_1 [FreeBSD] adns: 1.4_2 [FreeBSD] wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] linux-f10-gtk2: 2.14.7_5 [FreeBSD] tcpdump: 4.5.1 [FreeBSD] The process will require 82 MB more space. You may need to do by hand: o unmount linprocfs if mounted o delete /compat/linux/proc if present o remove/comment linprocfs from /etc/fstab if present [1/40] Deleting linux_base-c6-6.5_1: 3% pkg: /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.cache fails original SHA256 checksum, not removing [1/40] Deleting linux_base-c6-6.5_1: 100% [2/40] Deleting linux-c6-expat-2.0.1: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [3/40] Deleting linux-c6-fontconfig-2.8.0: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [4/40] Deleting linux-c6-xorg-libs-7.4: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [5/40] Deleting linux-c6-atk-1.30.0: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [6/40] Deleting linux-c6-png-1.2.49: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [7/40] Deleting linux-c6-jpeg-1.2.1: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [8/40] Deleting linux-c6-flashplugin-11.2r202.406: 100% [9/40] Deleting linux-c6-gtk2-2.20.1: 100% /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: not found pkg: POST-DEINSTALL script failed [10/40] Installing linux_base-f10-10_7: 100% Running linux ldconfig... [11/40] Deleting linux-c6-pango-1.28.1: 100% [12/40] Installing linux-f10-expat-2.0.1_1: 100% [13/40] Deleting linux-c6-cairo-1.8.8: 100% [14/40] Installing linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0_1: 100% [15/40] Deleting linux-c6-curl-7.19.7: 100% [16/40] Installing linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1: 100% [17/40] Installing linux-f10-png-1.2.37_2: 100% [18/40] Installing at-spi2-core-2.8.0_1: 100% [19/40] Deleting linux-c6-tiff-3.9.4: 100% [20/40] Deleting linux-c6-libssh2-1.4.2: 100% [21/40] Deleting linux-c6-nss-3.16.1: 100% [22/40] Installing linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_3: 100% [23/40] Installing linux-f10-jpeg-6b: 100% ===> Creating users and/or groups. Creating group 'colord' with gid '970'. Creating user 'colord' with uid '970'. [24/40] Installing colord-1.0.1_3: 100% [25/40] Installing at-spi2-atk-2.8.0_1: 100% [26/40] Deleting linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e: 100% [27/40] Deleting linux-c6-openldap-2.4.23: 100% [28/40] Deleting linux-c6-openssl-compat-0.9.8e: 100% [29/40] Deleting linux-c6-cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23: 100% [30/40] Deleting linux-c6-nspr-4.10.0: 100% [31/40] Deleting linux-c6-sqlite-3.6.20: 100% [32/40] Installing linux-f10-pango-1.28.3_1: 100% (pango-querymodules-32:4899): GLib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) Cannot load module /usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-thai-lang.so: libthai.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-thai-lang.so does not export Pango module API [33/40] Installing linux-f10-tiff-3.8.2: 100% [34/40] Installing linux-f10-atk-1.24.0_1: 100% [35/40] Installing gtk3-3.8.8_1: 100% [36/40] Installing libsmi-0.4.8_1: 100% [37/40] Installing adns-1.4_2: 100% [38/40] Installing wireshark-1.12.1: 100% [39/40] Installing linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_5: 100% (process:4918): GLib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) [40/40] Installing tcpdump-4.5.1: 100% whew !!!! that took (32.335 cpu + 6.306 sys) sec., 3:09.91 elapsed time tot, 20.3% CPU efficiency (203 text, 2490 data, 78192 max) KB, (2013+4325) io, 241 pfs + 0 swaps [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:24:51am] 700 % i.e. either wireshark or tcpdump (or 1 of their dependencies) required linux compatibility packages. Unfortunately it installed linux-f10 (which I have manually deleted a couple of times now) & deleted linux-c6, the newer & preferred (AKAIK) packages :-/. I have posted on this problem earlier & was infoirmed that FBSD is right mid-stroke on transitioning from linux-f10 to linux-c6 pkgs. I guess the wireshark and/or tcpdump maintainers need to be advised to switch to linux-c6 instead of linux-f10 for whatever compatibility is required. If I manually delete the linux-f10 stuff & reinstall the linux-c6 stuff, do you think wireshark/tcpdump will notice the difference ? I will probably do that anyway & try it, but I would like any advice or wisdom on that matter. Thx & I am off to experiment .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 13:39:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1FCF0E for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E1EFB2 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-88.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98DdH7L022926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:39:18 -0500 Message-ID: <54353FFC.3050309@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:45:32 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:39:19 -0000 On 10/08/14 02:22, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 08/10/2014 04:01, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> >> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >> messages file: >> >> > [irrelevance snipped] >> Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 276 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 239 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 280 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 5 11:30:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 319 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:25 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 276 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:26 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 239 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:27 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 280 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 10:41:29 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 319 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:41 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 253 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:42 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 233 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:44 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 265 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:45 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 295 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 14:59:47 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 324 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:18 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 253 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:20 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 233 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:21 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 265 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 295 to 200 packets/sec >> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 324 to 200 packets/sec >> >> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >> The lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where >> are they coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know >> ;-) .... TIA for any clues .... >> >> > > I occasionally get this on a machine that sits squarely behind a > locked down pfSense firewall. If you want to see what's causing it, > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=1 > > (put into your /etc/sysctl.conf if you want it to last over reboots.) > This will show you where the packet came from and which port on your > machine was the target. > > In my case it seemed to be a mix of DNS responses from the outside > world that arrived too late and a local long running Firefox > occasionally pounding on the indent port (113) for no good reason I > ever discovered. > > Nothing seems particularly dubious, unless the DNS responses were > attempted spoofs, but my ISP is one of the better UK ones and I'd > expect them to mitigate such attacks. > > Thanks, that seems quite simple, I'm on it now :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 13:59:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483FE92D for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F16243 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id cm18so5714363qab.6 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rtiJITmVo96JaV91LMTPrHDiaz0q4XK+rp4YISafB/8=; b=j0gzfNcZqLyVK11LHAcY2v90nuxGQVgWRkhFR0pz/ssgB3Y+IcXiPV4koBN4NimwzB Q/3Bk/ib+I4ZIXclnYckfZh1SDO+j2v24Fi4G6Ds7AcUZF9MhU4mV1cm/277Y2vwQ85a 2QXfJtjWDiiJE+Ko20s3tJFeAiOh0En/inJOy0sX7mNChiAeO4m4DjFmOH3nnyvViDYu qTGb9X2SKWx+2zdBYYEuemR7DHvRaOtM4rBP29nQiIAcAEKargQ/4A//K4nNGwzOF4g5 bsOW0F6nAhh6FuP1OziQkpjcCoRc5Zh39zKJcRbi7Ocd9sIcSbiTh1szxqiGNLBuMM2V Zs4w== X-Received: by 10.140.23.50 with SMTP id 47mr44720213qgo.77.1412776797705; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manutencao.portari.intra ([187.75.176.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm93150qaj.43.2014.10.08.06.59.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 06:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54354360.5070905@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:00:00 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkRhbnRlIEYuIEIuIENvbMOyIg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Samba clustering CTDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:59:59 -0000 Hello everyone, I know this is not the Samba mailing list, but anyone have tried CTDB on FreeBSD? I noted that there is no binary package available for install via pkg and also on ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 14:06:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48389B72 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E57351 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so6740656vcb.31 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:06:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t8QeKocXk4VSDVpW8XkvDYptHyQkSZ0MwCHtI1ELpAM=; b=lPyRTVkgsa66tFvbkKTpR9+zUs399AIz4fJcc5w4GqTU9KKOBF+xpdvsKQ5SQOA+nd QOFT11yxQ+jGhvjHtRodPsifICq2Ax/SkYxn7iGwSFJODtphfNoMPuDmXDg73nt8kWpt jvmbcEbjgKimrvEHD8FCWKJjmJEqm8i0kn5fvuD62q6jYJ3QmxV4N5PtAiUJ8GiZNaU/ QOY1z1I7zqs0Nly3J/Af1i8QDNuRMiJNyGlMwpCLxK0TttJIZElFiEki0NOxleNucFur pB/FxS1DbOFvfv3afYBk6ZSZ7YClhmS07gn6y9yMl1DV3fh8pZq3pTVuqVcUw3R5pvKk RedQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.230.226 with SMTP id tb2mr8778478vdc.74.1412777184980; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.248.202 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:06:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... From: Kurt Buff To: Arthur Chance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:06:26 -0000 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 08/10/2014 04:01, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >> messages file: >> >> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >> 324 to 200 packets/sec >> >> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >> The lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where >> are they coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know >> ;-) .... TIA for any clues .... >> >> > > I occasionally get this on a machine that sits squarely behind a locked down > pfSense firewall. If you want to see what's causing it, > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=1 > > (put into your /etc/sysctl.conf if you want it to last over reboots.) This > will show you where the packet came from and which port on your machine was > the target. > > In my case it seemed to be a mix of DNS responses from the outside world > that arrived too late and a local long running Firefox occasionally pounding > on the indent port (113) for no good reason I ever discovered. > > Nothing seems particularly dubious, unless the DNS responses were attempted > spoofs, but my ISP is one of the better UK ones and I'd expect them to > mitigate such attacks. Outstanding - much simpler than what I proposed, and I learned something new. Thanks for that. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 14:14:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F4AF08 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2001:470:1d:8da::100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oneyou.mcmli.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973A5656 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:558:6017:a2:a860:3073:4c46:6ac9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "sentry.24cl.com", Issuer "Mike's Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3jCcxg0CfPz1DNJ for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:14:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BigBloat (bigbloat.24cl.home [10.20.1.4]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3jCcxf0QDGz1Bwg for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <201410081014430703.00455B3A@smtp.24cl.home> In-Reply-To: <54353FFC.3050309@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434E626.80104@qeng-ho.org> <54353FFC.3050309@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:14:43 -0400 From: "Mike." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:14:49 -0000 On 10/8/2014 at 8:45 AM William A. Mahaffey III wrote: |On 10/08/14 02:22, Arthur Chance wrote: |> On 08/10/2014 04:01, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: |>> |>> |>> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my |>> messages file: |>> |>> |> [irrelevance snipped] |>> Oct 5 11:30:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from |>> 276 to 200 packets/sec |[snip] ============= I see this log entry occasionally also. Indeed, I saw it just this morning. The box in question is FreeBSD 10.0 and is used as an HTTP caching proxy, which is why the Firefox mention upthread caught my attention. The box sits behind a FreeBSD 10.0/pf firewall. I'll put into place the sysctl suggestion recommended upthread and see what I find. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 14:15:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90846F98 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22e.google.com (mail-vc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA38667 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hq12so6659863vcb.5 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:15:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DUH/cy5xoszSTwoRyxj3ruBY1DY3RB+Kb5oLL8trlGw=; b=S2DhT/x9IRNiDTx6spPEOxW9eBKM4LP6Iarpwa/N64pRD5RgT7+B4It2XxXT8QbjIp 8H4E9Z1jFjcE+V/lvpvxqj2mYfY2NcDwIReGcTnVZT+/12UzjLG+ZZXxwZ4PNPCmQY/G wjQLALQrTU0SVQnr2sEpTi9fU/EFEiZM/krwp78bFbxrYYk5tq1ZX0EdEEvvY/44RzUM bjv9SjEIjgPbJjTvfpbTyej7WKctxNOO65qdn1p2IDskiJAA4kq7jK0N4c/QumzWkf2l ep+ZC8Sw5YgL/PcvjA4+2DNMhR0Z7f7NjDZT0Ig9wr5IPUqeZYVC9QjfovaaEln7hhlV 4BVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.194.67 with SMTP id dx3mr10572406vcb.55.1412777706395; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.248.202 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:15:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 07:15:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... From: Kurt Buff To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:15:07 -0000 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:34 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/07/14 23:11, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> edited the message for clarity... >> >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:15 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/07/14 22:01, Kurt Buff wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >>>>> messages file: >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>>> 295 >>>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>>> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>>> 324 >>>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>>> >>>>> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >>>>> The >>>>> lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are >>>>> they >>>>> coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... >>>>> TIA >>>>> for any clues .... >>>>> >>>> AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. >>>> >>>> What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected >>>> to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine >>>> behind a router/firewall? >>>> >>>> Kurt >>>> >> >> >>> SOHO, behind a 2-bit firewall device. I used to have a IPCop box, but it >>> croaked a while back. I have a fair amount of firewalling active on this >>> box, derived from the stock ipfw file, w/ a few mods for NFS, & that's >>> it. I >>> am seeing nothing on other boxen on my LAN, FWIW .... Suggested course of >>> action ? >> >> I'd approach this with tcpdump, and wireshark. >> >> Assuming you have only one NIC (em0) on this machine, I'd set up >> something like this as root in a separate terminal/ssh session: >> >> tcpdump -npi em0 -C 1 -w /root/dumps/banger.pcap -W 100 >> >> This sets up a ring buffer where you'll get a maximum of 100 files of >> 1,000,000 bytes each. >> >> Then, when you note those odd messages again, you'll be able to stop >> the capture and correlate the time stamps of the messages and the >> tcpdump capture files. Examining the capture files with wireshark >> should make offending address(es) and/or port(s) stand out like a sore >> thumb. >> >> Kurt >> > > Hmmmmm .... OK. I had neither wireshark or tcpdump installed, so I did a pkg > install as such, which begat another problem: > i.e. either wireshark or tcpdump (or 1 of their dependencies) required linux > compatibility packages. Unfortunately it installed linux-f10 (which I have > manually deleted a couple of times now) & deleted linux-c6, the newer & > preferred (AKAIK) packages :-/. I have posted on this problem earlier & was > infoirmed that FBSD is right mid-stroke on transitioning from linux-f10 to > linux-c6 pkgs. I guess the wireshark and/or tcpdump maintainers need to be > advised to switch to linux-c6 instead of linux-f10 for whatever > compatibility is required. If I manually delete the linux-f10 stuff & > reinstall the linux-c6 stuff, do you think wireshark/tcpdump will notice the > difference ? I will probably do that anyway & try it, but I would like any > advice or wisdom on that matter. Thx & I am off to experiment .... No particular advice, except that tcpdump is native - no need to install that. However, Wireshark is so invaluable to me that I'd rather have that than most other software - but that's just my preference as a sysadmin using FreeBSD as an adjunct on the job where Windows predominates. OTOH, once you have the packet captures provided by tcpdump, they can be moved/copied to another machine for analysis, if you happen to have one. I often do this so that my FreeBSD machines can be freed to do their normal monitoring tasks. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 14:49:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9958A83 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718A6A2C for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-80.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98En3ku008564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:49:04 -0500 Message-ID: <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:55:18 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:49:06 -0000 On 10/08/14 09:15, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:34 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 10/07/14 23:11, Kurt Buff wrote: >>> edited the message for clarity... >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:15 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >>> wrote: >>>> On 10/07/14 22:01, Kurt Buff wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:01 PM, William A. Mahaffey III >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Over the last couple of days I am seeing some odd (to me) entries in my >>>>>> messages file: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Oct 7 15:03:22 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>>>> 295 >>>>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>>>> Oct 7 15:03:24 kabini1 kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from >>>>>> 324 >>>>>> to 200 packets/sec >>>>>> >>>>>> The stuff from Oct 2 is irrelevant, included for completeness/context. >>>>>> The >>>>>> lines about 'Limiting closed port ....' are puzzling to me. Where are >>>>>> they >>>>>> coming from ? Problem or chatter ? Enquiring minds wanna know ;-) .... >>>>>> TIA >>>>>> for any clues .... >>>>>> >>>>> AFAICT, someone is banging on your machine. >>>>> >>>>> What's your network environment look like? Are you directly connected >>>>> to the Internet, on a corporate network, or is this a home machine >>>>> behind a router/firewall? >>>>> >>>>> Kurt >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> SOHO, behind a 2-bit firewall device. I used to have a IPCop box, but it >>>> croaked a while back. I have a fair amount of firewalling active on this >>>> box, derived from the stock ipfw file, w/ a few mods for NFS, & that's >>>> it. I >>>> am seeing nothing on other boxen on my LAN, FWIW .... Suggested course of >>>> action ? >>> I'd approach this with tcpdump, and wireshark. >>> >>> Assuming you have only one NIC (em0) on this machine, I'd set up >>> something like this as root in a separate terminal/ssh session: >>> >>> tcpdump -npi em0 -C 1 -w /root/dumps/banger.pcap -W 100 >>> >>> This sets up a ring buffer where you'll get a maximum of 100 files of >>> 1,000,000 bytes each. >>> >>> Then, when you note those odd messages again, you'll be able to stop >>> the capture and correlate the time stamps of the messages and the >>> tcpdump capture files. Examining the capture files with wireshark >>> should make offending address(es) and/or port(s) stand out like a sore >>> thumb. >>> >>> Kurt >>> >> Hmmmmm .... OK. I had neither wireshark or tcpdump installed, so I did a pkg >> install as such, which begat another problem: > > >> i.e. either wireshark or tcpdump (or 1 of their dependencies) required linux >> compatibility packages. Unfortunately it installed linux-f10 (which I have >> manually deleted a couple of times now) & deleted linux-c6, the newer & >> preferred (AKAIK) packages :-/. I have posted on this problem earlier & was >> infoirmed that FBSD is right mid-stroke on transitioning from linux-f10 to >> linux-c6 pkgs. I guess the wireshark and/or tcpdump maintainers need to be >> advised to switch to linux-c6 instead of linux-f10 for whatever >> compatibility is required. If I manually delete the linux-f10 stuff & >> reinstall the linux-c6 stuff, do you think wireshark/tcpdump will notice the >> difference ? I will probably do that anyway & try it, but I would like any >> advice or wisdom on that matter. Thx & I am off to experiment .... > > No particular advice, except that tcpdump is native - no need to install that. > > However, Wireshark is so invaluable to me that I'd rather have that > than most other software - but that's just my preference as a sysadmin > using FreeBSD as an adjunct on the job where Windows predominates. > > OTOH, once you have the packet captures provided by tcpdump, they can > be moved/copied to another machine for analysis, if you happen to have > one. I often do this so that my FreeBSD machines can be freed to do > their normal monitoring tasks. > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > tcpdump was not installed by default (this is a desktop box, not a server, maybe the diff) .... In any event, I redressed the linux-f10/linux-c6 situation & so far, no issues .... yippee :-) !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 15:19:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0E8595 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C30BD93 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-30-92.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.30.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4C9027BC5; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:19:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s98FJa0R005520; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:19:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:19:36 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... Message-Id: <20141008171936.8442c33f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:19:47 -0000 On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:55:18 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > tcpdump was not installed by default (this is a desktop box, not a > server, maybe the diff) .... Very strange. The tcpdump tool is part of the FreeBSD operating system ("base"): /usr/sbin/tcpdump should be installed no matter what configuration change you might have included... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 15:24:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61114752 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC17E58 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-80.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98FOcXV002452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:24:38 -0500 Message-ID: <543558A7.8070703@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:30:47 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> <20141008171936.8442c33f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141008171936.8442c33f.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:24:40 -0000 On 10/08/14 10:19, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:55:18 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> tcpdump was not installed by default (this is a desktop box, not a >> server, maybe the diff) .... > Very strange. The tcpdump tool is part of the FreeBSD > operating system ("base"): /usr/sbin/tcpdump should be > installed no matter what configuration change you might > have included... > > > > Hmmmm .... Well, it showed 1 as an available pkg, which is what I installed, along w/ wireshark .... hope I didn't screw anything up :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 17:21:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC058A5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D468E69 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u10so8646448lbd.15 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=a2+gEAg5cs7OYqdm5nThTM2Qi2xQwEk8RaiSkWLU1sY=; b=HQIegwBD8AhMzrOSTi3heWjjhSBvUqjNYLV1mNM67u7rkSsK6+PQNga5J6Mm8nBAUj eTPVEs2Dz+hMLvcZGetz5aaUdR2YJblTsAoSXdKq+6sTLpWHeZPxEyWx/r9WmKAOgHKB ChZBVdHIpF4mHdTFRC2pscVe11jsyjmAf6lRkm4/Im524YPNU2bjx+57Ps375RzOal8D yTbj0mTkrOn1F7fa7nBYO0w497sC/ox633Tom/1JXjwkA2ddI1s3/T16z8tkVyt/zKYE Gh3+5yHDpMhy/3os48dqcnzmjOgRXM1WjZdrfNcWmByuB1kmaPH1yKvp7j7M7mQgLW9s Ckug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.10.2 with SMTP id e2mr4873719lab.96.1412788869149; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.29.132 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:21:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: From: Kate Bobak To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:21:11 -0000 Hello, I want to place text link ads on freebsd.org for a year. I should be very grateful if you would let me know what are you think about this. I also consider banner advertising opportunity If you have other sites where you can place links let me know please. Many thanks and all best! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 18:21:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C458D1A for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1817A812 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hn15so972392igb.3 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:21:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Otw0fFJ1U1/sZCkzmIILGZfDdTsookSBM9Z7mvO1nbU=; b=dKKb0EdOLEVqx7azEH7/Scx2znTxNq6RJldemI9Sh8g9GnBkMUmEhX61rYxOixe15r Dr5fFXErTJSoH3Brj7mEnwc37TjrHs+ckv6AsDSxfTftfk99uSpd28t9LdHzZngnZ/3a dRr5e92RHrN41NbaEjtwsNIOoA3nYmnQZ/0CHAOcHhbHomVt4F9UFIVQI/k+pT6aJkE8 FdxNSRj078x5WIlHBkdRg90BnljUkGeE6DOZ4lZD/bHtnSZBeP2K65w6koNvzNg5YUWH 8qnEEIf+7mfg+1MR6iXAQZqi1HACZHbmOfwna3g5vHcc5ZVBwOxF0m7lnSAOm6bVU4jB j68w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltk+3my2zLQItHIVjc5SxsaEu6MUVvm3QWmFucB3i4m8Xw+ZFJ7dI0/f//8GJ8KHA5EW9V X-Received: by 10.50.77.44 with SMTP id p12mr33731690igw.10.1412792514256; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:21:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.9.137 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54354360.5070905@gmail.com> References: <54354360.5070905@gmail.com> From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Samba clustering CTDB To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFudGUgRi4gQi4gQ29sw7I=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:21:56 -0000 To get CTDB working you need clustering FS and, ATM we don't have any(?). On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:00 PM, "Dante F. B. Col=C3=B2" wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I know this is not the Samba mailing list, but anyone have tried CTDB on > FreeBSD? I noted that there is no binary package available for install vi= a > pkg and also on ports. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 18:52:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C7D4F9 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D37B00 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id 0is81p004516WCc01isAMG; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:52:10 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OOap3EqB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=XXO3FzSGgsIA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=WTKGRivCJj7VkbOHirYA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Received: from sedbergh.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=curlew.lan) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XbwLI-0005Bg-2F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:52:08 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:52:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3680979.7idvKWMyJF@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/10.1-RC1; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:52:20 -0000 On Wednesday 08 Oct 2014 08:34:04 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:21:10am] 699 % pkg install -y wireshark > tcpdump > New packages to be INSTALLED: > wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] > linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > linux_base-c6-6.5_1 One of the dangers of using the "-y" option. There's not much point using this option when running interactively because it denies you the option of bailing out if it wants to do unexpected things. Without the "-y" option if extra packages need to be installed they will be listed and you will be asked to confirm - it's an all or nothing question so you only have to type "y" or "n" once no matter how many packages are involved. But I'm puzzled why it wanted to install the linux packages anyway neither wireshark nor tcpdump depend on them. Here's the output from a PC which didn't have any linux packages on it ===================================================================== root@fbsd10:~ # pkg install -n wireshark tcpdump Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 9 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] gtk3: 3.8.8_1 [FreeBSD] colord: 1.0.1_3 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-atk: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] at-spi2-core: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] GeoIP: 1.6.2_1 [FreeBSD] libsmi: 0.4.8_1 [FreeBSD] adns: 1.4_2 [FreeBSD] tcpdump: 4.5.1 [FreeBSD] The process will require 145 MB more space. 22 MB to be downloaded. ===================================================================== BTW, as others have said tcpdump is part of the base system and you didn't need to install the port which offers additional bleeding-edge features. You can safely delete the tcpdump package. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 19:28:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6189A8 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70265E61 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-80.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98JSk4N029216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:28:47 -0500 Message-ID: <543591E5.4030400@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:35:01 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> <3680979.7idvKWMyJF@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <3680979.7idvKWMyJF@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:28:49 -0000 On 10/08/14 13:52, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Wednesday 08 Oct 2014 08:34:04 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:21:10am] 699 % pkg install -y wireshark >> tcpdump > > >> New packages to be INSTALLED: >> wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] >> linux-f10-xorg-libs: 7.4_1 [FreeBSD] > > >> Installed packages to be REMOVED: >> linux_base-c6-6.5_1 > One of the dangers of using the "-y" option. There's not much point > using this option when running interactively because it denies you the > option of bailing out if it wants to do unexpected things. > > Without the "-y" option if extra packages need to be installed they > will be listed and you will be asked to confirm - it's an all or > nothing question so you only have to type "y" or "n" once no matter > how many packages are involved. > > But I'm puzzled why it wanted to install the linux packages anyway > neither wireshark nor tcpdump depend on them. Here's the output from a > PC which didn't have any linux packages on it > > ===================================================================== > root@fbsd10:~ # pkg install -n wireshark tcpdump > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 9 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > wireshark: 1.12.1 [FreeBSD] > gtk3: 3.8.8_1 [FreeBSD] > colord: 1.0.1_3 [FreeBSD] > at-spi2-atk: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] > at-spi2-core: 2.8.0_1 [FreeBSD] > GeoIP: 1.6.2_1 [FreeBSD] > libsmi: 0.4.8_1 [FreeBSD] > adns: 1.4_2 [FreeBSD] > tcpdump: 4.5.1 [FreeBSD] > > The process will require 145 MB more space. > 22 MB to be downloaded. > ===================================================================== > > BTW, as others have said tcpdump is part of the base system and you > didn't need to install the port which offers additional bleeding-edge > features. You can safely delete the tcpdump package. > Your point on the -y option is well taken, I wasn't expecting any trouble, & sometimes I type that command in & walk off to do something else while pkg does its thing; w/o a -y, it waits until I'm back to proceed. This may be a recurrence of the problem I have been posting about, which boils down to the FBSD pkg system is mid-stream changing over from linux-f10 to linux-c6, & repos are still in a state of flux .... I cleaned up the linux compatibility stuff & seem to be back in the saddle again .... Thx. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 19:37:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8148C2BB for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511D7E2 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id eu11so9699841pac.0 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:37:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jUvVBjBoVNnxIHsnhLl36vV+NZjWCeHkLi2DRc0vW18=; b=UAlfa9KaXZi9xRgAQkq2NgRqz62otLFIHE2qBSiktq04VnJfQnSwfAmaXthHDEQEob lCajpd7HCb1o7x0dkjtAATNX2XxIlEPXsAbv2qAGcT7LiOjz3QJViam3iMNc5HOPp4Ym iA7D8oSgbfUk1HKm3pw6nxixq1MAK/qFgM5ur8hiGOMFlszekP0HHnnYE4RQpiD7cnIV GZDXNhacQ1qOHbJLH5bhgZWF/p094hPLk/X0OeBYQtYRK8ETg5PreSoFDtt5gVFbGYk6 S2KxiHucMqoDqYxO9feirxJGVwP8N7saURQHU86PZeZjlFwe7ksh6a4Q4GzyoVh3zFq/ YMgg== X-Received: by 10.70.88.234 with SMTP id bj10mr13506090pdb.98.1412797050956; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (0019cb2ce9ff.click-network.com. [131.191.16.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ja2sm676570pbb.82.2014.10.08.12.37.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:37:29 -0700 From: Joshua Lokken To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... Message-ID: <20141008193729.GA13314@satellite> References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> <20141008171936.8442c33f.freebsd@edvax.de> <543558A7.8070703@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <543558A7.8070703@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:37:31 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct/08 10:30AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/08/14 10:19, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:55:18 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> tcpdump was not installed by default (this is a desktop box, not a > >> server, maybe the diff) .... > > Very strange. The tcpdump tool is part of the FreeBSD > > operating system ("base"): /usr/sbin/tcpdump should be > > installed no matter what configuration change you might > > have included... > > > > > > > > >=20 > Hmmmm .... Well, it showed 1 as an available pkg, which is what I=20 > installed, along w/ wireshark .... hope I didn't screw anything up :-/ ..= =2E. >=20 > --=20 >=20 > William A. Mahaffey III Do you have the following in /etc/make.conf: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=3Dc6 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=3Dc6 I was under the impression that that should tell ports not to use the f10 stuff in favor of c6? Joshua --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUNZJ5AAoJELtj8KItrean0tAP/jJImRscry9ZqRflSCFS1IJW AACB10zWnzH/Vw+sJY30dA/IL1KqMYJ+GTdY7F2VC7o0/HnSSD5VBJr5W9H/02x9 JjRvTXOXpBFxDzyOvstGUrPAc7xCEpMk0rFwqjwNqxowZZA++rGaRBCO+tdA6UwW /Fum80duVKqhj41rKP4I7swVVuLE06i9WG9UlC+QD3kgH1rZUWsmD8ZHFGS8s0zX dc3gledQS8XiBaCD+YiTvezYI6qTY2BIcUGL/dIDVkPacs46PqBd39jybCBrIEVT LSEILXsW2QIh6PnhpdLhGF/vwcI0pa8kO5sQter0mRbJABMjyFSOQgkQTjWAFaKn syzLQTU2qbvonLTJO3XREIYDbEGKcspl+FgDkVsptnUxMmDBpKb05QwO5V57zi8l ORtqxAYlUBPYZTDvBFelEOO6liOiIWinVYYtjAeG7R+EJWISZ1JY5byDxgOxE9LI /deiDE3PP5zlWMrtaRKxjPJjihyF+OJbBBNzmMQi/lYH430129r3bCvAlS4Qhudu HG2UnfgdLbsx0Tt4Z3SuwjYBs7P8r0zSFhTHUezixE1vKT6n2kvwXPMW2mz+/Wkh M0Oxf10sWGPAbiv+7xr863WvJtEdXLYYKzUNsDQ6XmMWAtoAqJKBakbiw6ar/yVO /1Coip4trdZc6uxg4wRF =qaY/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 19:47:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CFEA7CF for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63731242 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-80.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s98JlpvX008271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:47:52 -0500 Message-ID: <5435965E.3010905@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:54:06 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oddball syslog entries .... References: <5434A8F7.1090507@hiwaay.net> <5434AC3A.40707@hiwaay.net> <54353D4C.7080403@hiwaay.net> <54355056.2080509@hiwaay.net> <20141008171936.8442c33f.freebsd@edvax.de> <543558A7.8070703@hiwaay.net> <20141008193729.GA13314@satellite> In-Reply-To: <20141008193729.GA13314@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:47:53 -0000 On 10/08/14 14:37, Joshua Lokken wrote: > On Oct/08 10:30AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 10/08/14 10:19, Polytropon wrote: >>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:55:18 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> tcpdump was not installed by default (this is a desktop box, not a >>>> server, maybe the diff) .... >>> Very strange. The tcpdump tool is part of the FreeBSD >>> operating system ("base"): /usr/sbin/tcpdump should be >>> installed no matter what configuration change you might >>> have included... >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Hmmmm .... Well, it showed 1 as an available pkg, which is what I >> installed, along w/ wireshark .... hope I didn't screw anything up :-/ .... >> >> -- >> >> William A. Mahaffey III > Do you have the following in /etc/make.conf: > > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 > > I was under the impression that that should tell ports not to > use the f10 stuff in favor of c6? > > > Joshua Yes I do, put them in a couple of weeks ago when I began migrating over to linux-c6 compatibility .... The problem seems to be that pkg isn't aware of those settings & still reverts to linux-f10 because repos aren't yet updated .... It'll clear up in a week or so, I just keep forgetting about it & getting snagged :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 20:42:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557998D5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA2FAAA for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A46A562BF688; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:42:14 -0700 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:42:21 -0000 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Yes, sound works, at least most of the time. But this is the out-of-the-box configuration and so I assume I'm loading more drivers than I need. Here's what I've got: FreeBSD home.parts-unknown.org 10.1-BETA3 FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 #0 r272441: Th= u Oct 2 13:05:04 PDT 2014 root@home.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src= /sys/GENERIC amd64 Installed devices: pcm0: (play) pcm1: (play/rec) default I'm using the Realtek. Here are the sound modules I have loaded: 7 1 0xffffffff81a3c000 4068 snd_driver.ko 8 2 0xffffffff81a41000 8aa0 snd_vibes.ko 9 2 0xffffffff81a4a000 7990 snd_via82c686.ko 10 2 0xffffffff81a52000 8480 snd_t4dwave.ko 11 4 0xffffffff81a5b000 28c0 snd_spicds.ko 12 2 0xffffffff81a5e000 a7e0 snd_solo.ko 13 5 0xffffffff81a69000 6118 snd_sbc.ko 14 2 0xffffffff81a70000 8198 snd_sb8.ko 15 2 0xffffffff81a79000 8200 snd_sb16.ko 16 2 0xffffffff81a82000 14f90 snd_neomagic.ko 17 3 0xffffffff81a97000 169e0 snd_mss.ko 18 2 0xffffffff81aae000 e808 snd_maestro3.ko 19 2 0xffffffff81abd000 eb10 snd_maestro.ko 20 2 0xffffffff81acc000 7328 snd_fm801.ko 21 2 0xffffffff81ad4000 a920 snd_ess.ko 22 2 0xffffffff81adf000 c978 snd_envy24ht.ko 23 2 0xffffffff81aec000 e130 snd_envy24.ko 24 2 0xffffffff81afb000 fe80 snd_ds1.ko 25 2 0xffffffff81b0b000 8c60 snd_cs4281.ko 26 2 0xffffffff81b14000 a390 snd_atiixp.ko 27 2 0xffffffff81b1f000 8f80 snd_als4000.ko 28 2 0xffffffff81b28000 b928 snd_ad1816.ko For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should reload the driver. But which one? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNaGmAAoJEBV64x4SNmArhaMQALtzTJwKB50I86NH56WLS4Sd MV9dnjHRmjziHw0nJiZIEg0iBC3ZMqs7N1XdgnPMvwU5Hh+WwJ8mvGfARnd2zPGw 8z8cQLjORVi9dbGVJvAvukDxqOmC3BNlXfKx7o4h+149/8FUiHRugGwvcLvMsdgd nl/GircoHgB4fa2dv8qrqKEu83fRIiXX5C21rFoXj6if27aiIq2dqqM5lsGmKidm WE2sDI3pGTahH2ZQi+OZfY9RUPD6eo0TqEtEFPL/1obAiGMlGQj7wgoe16JwK/fJ PqBxlzG2yW2lWHs3pI8tdxDvckUBq85ehxJy4D4hBV/6lo+klRJ+4sKIDDetLgcs O6HaOi1pKDwgIJB+gOdWNN4R4OMvqsKCGGjHJRrKNKK6O8xs0SPCLHqVpC0zHrPl wstYl0AE9o99tRb5T1ZCTx6M59mI0Zv9P0Rx3zukCsED7QZSevhvJVsTTMxpLHOM FPo6edV8xNlFHJaBt3BgHaoz4zEJpIH5dOe+oiiNTp9fpIt6dJvg9O3tGvwMBuaZ /mBfWI7XrQw1Y+Wjvq4z5TSj7I8/dPfHtLFasbi9ijadxRXT1hEpa5SYGZcAY6fQ gt2fIk5Soo2nohSDq0BCqN6GSg498mtiZbEvQWkD7h+8oRO3q9WWQYmrPl0pBAcZ AaHT5CtF3Hjwe2Wn56oh =8D7z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 20:52:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A13C8B for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982A8BB6 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-30-92.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.30.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BAA527660; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:52:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s98KqN5r002300; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:52:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:52:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: David Benfell Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-Id: <20141008225223.b2157804.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:52:27 -0000 On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:42:14 -0700, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, > > Yes, sound works, at least most of the time. But this is the > out-of-the-box configuration and so I assume I'm loading more drivers > than I need. Here's what I've got: > > FreeBSD home.parts-unknown.org 10.1-BETA3 FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 #0 r272441: Thu Oct 2 13:05:04 PDT 2014 root@home.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play) > pcm1: (play/rec) default > > I'm using the Realtek. Here are the sound modules I have loaded: > [...] > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > reload the driver. But which one? It's probably the HDA driver, see "man snd_hda"... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 21:39:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBFE4C96 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723B977 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s98LdhIj006923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s98Ldhos006920; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Benfell Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? In-Reply-To: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> Message-ID: References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:39:43 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:39:47 -0000 On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > reload the driver. But which one? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 21:39:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA24EE0F for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4710E8E for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s98LdvSh006987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s98LdvH3006984; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:39:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Benfell Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? In-Reply-To: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> Message-ID: References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:39:58 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:39:59 -0000 On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > reload the driver. But which one? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 21:40:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC2AEA7 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C51C7 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v10so6282152qac.40 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=sE3dNmVG5VhoYRRoH8J4wQ/xL7ajg/GLUsHyXn5h73k=; b=LUTkU5hbeh/hRo6vk4dfZQqsZmFUDlixpIEPRwy6fEIErErSfv+wpo2alopyXqk6k4 xgsmkpeaFdNDJ8ejsX8xQAvrd0/xnEbbdqisgIEb+tTko8MTJArmbUhJTJE58VDG7AuK y/0DKyiUD0cEY9mdu6f1n1MtuI+6ylUuRVn3aXkqMLik23Q8iRvjN1C+w86Eu4C+yXBb xrgHYv1uz1cbZ4ym5X099Ey0UxXrgoxTBCbVfm8pCorS0bUTnxKVF8TJh9Robgft0Kz6 HrSVBju10teG6lPwXdRxSUrAKUsHiTqEuZoi5GyXKfMKXiyY2G3Qc4QX2tut8lcSDkCQ 7aVg== X-Received: by 10.224.75.73 with SMTP id x9mr17268489qaj.63.1412804408628; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manutencao.portari.intra ([187.75.176.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm842388qar.38.2014.10.08.14.40.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5435AF3C.30801@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:40:12 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkRhbnRlIEYuIEIuIENvbMOyIg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: Samba clustering CTDB References: <54354360.5070905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:40:09 -0000 Hello Timur Since is not available on Freebsd repos and ports system i was wondering if there is some i problem with it, i was thinking about use along with HAST and some file system. ATM ? I'm sorry , what is this ? On 10/8/14 3:21 PM, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > To get CTDB working you need clustering FS and, ATM we don't have any(?). > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:00 PM, "Dante F. B. Colò" > > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I know this is not the Samba mailing list, but anyone have tried > CTDB on FreeBSD? I noted that there is no binary package available > for install via pkg and also on ports. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 21:59:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A2403E0 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11263302 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F0A3762BF68C; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:59:44 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Polytropon Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008215944.GA39434@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008225223.b2157804.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008225223.b2157804.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:59:46 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: >=20 > It's probably the HDA driver, see "man snd_hda"... >=20 I take it this is built in by default? I can't unload or load it. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNbPQAAoJEBV64x4SNmArVXgQAKEI9IIDz6m2kCLyCpz7DN9U 8vRA151+MNnWSWRG8iDC+HU2LCFjdDYOYTClMypNbqx7ToTVXat9UuKGSzY8mNC8 lytVjnqEqMONtR6rHcHhjkgjDTo1wURY9DLZOBnLAVRavIt6Seg3OQhLI3tadZXw YHS6SbUDq1r3hANtC6GPOO1ZoPviwIP3ak/y4lpIJ3dJlipMy0yQyAge7uRQ8foZ OhLvdKSd6kn5l6bQSKppefyQA79adFzjRDSijMW+E030ZRPR9sGjL+rUxKpHUwVL kyFFfnM+KkeTQlK3OV0x+6KgUoOSMRDGde3LeZItmi+knb1tk+N1j/TeEVju13UT kFo8rP5/8XlhskLyNXJe8FJo4RSFo7AcUREy4bJobfxckRUoU0K0ieAz3cWtnu8c km+Vg0DNjZvv1jrsnVXw4hRmq3YeIxec/QxRNbAoqIhMe1fMchOL6Pb3DnT+bTE0 BuRXYywFrMbaW9dkGN1mUaiusxaD2woPadZT80dIvbRIwuiYGmuarjU9A5jeWAVE 1i7+qCUf8DiETQy9V0/zIAVAwTnc+CpiUVxTgPKXBdUmPAxqzcOel8YeSW0GcOOJ v3xO0m7DrGkRXS6ARqkjOsjTi6Bdq4z6c3HEQh14atXbwHJgshgJziRoHFSOqJeg V8RAscC6kqN8PGI5OPEF =CE4V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 22:00:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12813483 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDAB63B3 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7F4E162BF68B; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:00:48 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Warren Block Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:00:49 -0000 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: >=20 > > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > > reload the driver. But which one? >=20 > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.ht= ml Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and the kernel modules I have available. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNbQQAAoJEBV64x4SNmArkCQP/30oEhbogXVfVGBoTbgz2MX1 hLjBqJ0bcqBZtrYOjqhq6QkiPqrlaqRnlG89hHyfUArI3/G2GtQqZswWjluo1O2a 97sgIFYzGC0LW3m8fmuA8M5TmHnFxt1+Fv8kLe8KRPNOG5ZcOt6vT/CJFyic9d0y PKiOASgiRky6B1isbH+5BwQ39JWrZRn5yC4x/vTa+P1Ew28WVA/pElnZy9M0YJ9a WnWymNiNgdQLvkBJYxOtVmdG13qB1bTeiwU7yUmDUQ8DasgCrB4E2bXQjkcj5Acc V70wY+KLmYdI0cC9xnVF9W6esqvQ6nZTB8VOJfqPV9B0PxIdor9qjsnX0fINhv+I OTUACCNObK6Jupkfg3Gtm5zONnDRPHyGNg/gvqDjvk/fAyHI7f7Sv/jSt8yieOz5 fP5RgkdrKPAgVVH7Jx84k8dx1bbMUqNDF5anOo1pxLZxw8C1iXnlV8RoVelQwoSX ywJUKQZdm+b8i1QJm6a0csJ/cfuKGE50PDURCx6xe+5KNR0GKk+nehhO0FWL9tGn JFndC8N70blSpmNYvO+oM8Q/4bWUColAGqSRhTh3wfbOTYvi2XXZ6Ey8UI8fC2GY nEYHHQCpTrMe06o8nuV6QXbRoxxd501IMXTxD01rcG0lYAC+gENhoeFJVDnOk7Lt J5Il1DMDXzR5jr6NWl4e =r6nd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 22:32:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC263FA1 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD43901 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id a13so566907igq.16 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VHSc4ZZpc1L6gQ4KslfBrYNWF8PUrPeHTYDxpPQETOc=; b=SkRR6/wnOXiB94vSOEvMpY76B4ld5nm6FvL9WfgpAi4q9GOgtrRPLvwbob8pVgDLz/ gyEMtFfs9GlAt46aBhBaLxarCZVWacGrq/LoTaTVAEYo1n23dI5Xn37z7YViJ5kskIqL BZu+IpLCZ0iY3iOdiO6bFwELRJLGKyL8t1IZWYBKRntljymesihkMCfjxbmdn5o0b4SU qVcbyyHM9mLr5lGxilLbupmsvzrQdK+JD+5V0BFbS4txFOQ7R9zFqE4g+nxZ7KolhLBB 8B0J3/I/T1bvj7kE6VyS21BTrB6erJ/nCmNxrKGJMDtJNhvFqSRxGTr1k+y7UKeqsvK5 yJAQ== X-Received: by 10.42.46.13 with SMTP id i13mr915275icf.13.1412807545913; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (0019cb2ce9ff.click-network.com. [131.191.16.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id an1sm2459648igc.7.2014.10.08.15.32.24 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:32:23 -0700 From: Joshua Lokken To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008223223.GB13314@satellite> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:32:27 -0000 --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct/08 03:00PM, David Benfell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > >=20 > > > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > > > reload the driver. But which one? > >=20 > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.= html >=20 > Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and > the kernel modules I have available. >=20 I have the Realtek ALC889, and I use snd_hda. I would guess (as a previous responder suggested) that snd_hda is the driver you need. Joshua --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUNbt3AAoJELtj8KItreanZFoP/i17NRMomvskkaywec+YG/fB qusYZCEU+i5jBEmk7ffNKkLunIL8BQXbANXJ6pBkaV2lFwuMbsC1pQAVxC7dZ1En OIkuc/YNrlVlFdAPYhQLbNGjxuGPtt82jPYqYYIebzBssGt73RbJEb88TjOWQ+sy qaNQ8V7k3/lMK2ypJ9bN4mcrYq1nuOLs3Xixmxlchtra7TyKwqu5o4AcsF5GdmzB R6nRDS2GDMzhXZxXOKmNp9H1NXUaYNPm1Y2WBE0XC1ElZ8d+SQtJ4prCuFqOGcOh rKNLePKNwWy1AHC+zjSD31kJj2iN6qIg379JbkMpLil02HbYH8Z9dHxAtgack1Ff jGoAMH72tyNTkioyb4NzBbc2SFanURbBeiBEpPiXtSStkyKzMVN2kU/79KmXYXip X+/WB6iY8kSLoU403wuxWB9pPlRAwJbE/Hy8kQk6slMgh+8Iwc5ffO1+aTaUhlR/ YaXU2/tU9s/qS5sH8Nnf3IGPzodbMWeh+lc8q+KngrG1W5wSvr6EN+n9Cso3nqaX n0qo/ruN71S69wxPjJf+1SHL2O8grhDHCRwNrN00xzQN6VqKowlyvUFuskvVB2kt T/drms0htqDIhMRI0vDn6CJoIE7G/7abq176u5lXSScpdz9tRHayB34tlZ9fQnuB 4SSlJ5+uNe7156nmUBBs =opN7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 23:07:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF025C2 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2BD7C00 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s98N7pUi028847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:07:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s98N7paR028844; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:07:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:07:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: David Benfell Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? In-Reply-To: <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> Message-ID: References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:07:51 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:07:53 -0000 On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: >> >>> For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should >>> reload the driver. But which one? >> >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html > > Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and > the kernel modules I have available. The important part is cat /dev/sndstat But for most motherboards, adding snd_hda_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf is enough. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 23:09:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3DE673 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FECFC1E for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5EC4C62BF68A; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:09:32 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Joshua Lokken Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008230932.GA76419@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008223223.GB13314@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008223223.GB13314@satellite> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:09:34 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:32:23PM -0700, Joshua Lokken wrote: > On Oct/08 03:00PM, David Benfell wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > > >=20 > > > > For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > > > > reload the driver. But which one? > > >=20 > > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setu= p.html > >=20 > > Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and > > the kernel modules I have available. > >=20 >=20 > I have the Realtek ALC889, and I use snd_hda. I would guess (as a previo= us > responder suggested) that snd_hda is the driver you need. >=20 And I finally found the GENERIC configuration. snd_hda is indeed built in. So I'll wind up testing this on my next reboot (I've commented out the loader.conf entry that loads a bunch of snd_* modules that I probably don't need). In the meantime, sound on the system passes the idiot test: cat /dev/random > /dev/dsp produces white noise. So I'm guessing my problem is at a higher level. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNcQsAAoJEBV64x4SNmArmYsQAJVwe7gb3WTttArsPrpZ2kpN JN9up6CqCPO1nGJwzQuaZGm7Y9mAw1guPbljBQh0GDKZOEJ2Y18imP/I58G2NJqf tf2uGebaK3rI5FzMLU0z4Kv6wfvGPhEzU05dd5O1CPNh+Bo6lxQg9NgatITDjRIv ppleKeDkFf1j3c97sJxAn1LhnjH9NVuNvy80osdlvBue/O/2+oT81TSEzFD3OG6d AV3mHhT5CteYG+V7l4Fg6UwOlwf9v/xYEbgZCJkhKDEQZko4jxMKMX8+qjgfcvkV flBCEaVXGmeLm3ubuy5ZPjaQFydJWzgtJjncb/Zi93Wx/g+hPSrg3CBCm8C2g/Lj XRVd8F10uQN8rkOJEN4EfhL/k/0294cr0cx+ftX3hUwtZcqpO+fTjK9nP7rKEm6F 9qO8lwOm7FtZHxYbYS4tjJLn/6CpL1JNfWJkFnI+OVuETN6AMi/xrPdcK1C0UA6W GVzFYufrwIy213BGZHZxKPeBNtN6fhxYGJDrwV/3TINJJoHAfti2WzEPzJ8Sys+Z Hy4fc/BUeCz/K5K4bHZ0rFt55DbzZmFuFKUksX4Wfh7RB4ReDhTl46b1dHhBeSHY UGXGBl5MEU6ke8K+0QQkSMwNMcjLg1/0F6qNoTaGbaVNcppAI6utuvtk9ZEkih+j SZi/zHleFlPoJghyYVJN =aCVM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 23:13:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B29C07C5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9775FCC7 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4370A62BF688; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:13:41 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Warren Block Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141008231341.GA81856@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:13:41 -0000 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:07:51PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > >> > >>> For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > >>> reload the driver. But which one? > >> > >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup= =2Ehtml > > > > Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and > > the kernel modules I have available. >=20 > The important part is > cat /dev/sndstat As I previously posted (but didn't properly label): Installed devices: pcm0: (play) pcm1: (play/rec) default >=20 > But for most motherboards, adding > snd_hda_load=3D"YES" If I'm understanding the GENERIC configuration correctly, snd_hda is built in, but this would be a harmless line to add, so I'm doing it. >=20 > to /boot/loader.conf is enough. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNcUlAAoJEBV64x4SNmArEbYP/0cZTYR+JMPVRxNhVYz77zMC NnaTEZpJutMvTvu/yKhjkGIAM+YEOjzrInxfk2HTPhPPhCWjWKrLMan5vHBm6nUs m4Ope0WnjmzJ82ZhIm+65D0bKo7USjY/UtqMP44DjU/82eqHqunQheAu3rTU/tL5 opKCv+5+KzqWRCnOj5gY0P62QmaDLzbw8yVp+BBkTql4yLkg5g9KWZ+ySLlI2l9K 4nLxDPoARRtH4Z1yNfXAAoe0mgIRCNaWn3n4wlym0SXTBmednI/JWRjuLEfpYcEp tZouDwxydS9dFcDg3KTuf/RCaZvLdMA66orAxPnftGAXba4fM1hg9rLndvfPS8sr Y6eozP/xUptPnUwdvBkkla7Pf3YgaK8XQsq09/vN15uH6C0b+iovY5dxO8kk8kDK 8MzaLql88iD+B6fvl/rBPHC3kEwk544ArI7J6HHwX+BryFnvY/O4VmlxkXVEwZLu pvwlwNMDZyjRRiNKp7tUkdhWoQq2VnqQe/FaZVYvmOsSjRClomgRzezhrgYQdMN/ LgvVhNpd5u4RwGpwcOq//0pXAXbvMdm29Bh3E3LrqrxsJVZ4Go8BwIZzastcdRcp 5m697bWIO72u5rjWRMvbhiu5wV+DrItHUqqf/NOZVDfONDoLTYFbe7KSyhihglpg yfKQGyAEmYi/7zqH79dK =k93q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 23:40:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83345B2B for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1622AE9D for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [84.131.114.99] (helo=max2.muc.opensauce.de) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc0f8-000287-Ep; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:28:54 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? From: Stephen Riehm In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 01:28:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> To: Warren Block X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAb3BlbnNhdWNlLmRl Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Benfell X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:40:39 -0000 Hi, I'm also a bit lost with this. (Yes I've also read the sound-setup = handbook) My /boot/loader.conf consists of: autoboot_delay=3D"2" = =20 zfs_load=3D"YES" = =20 sound_load=3D"YES" # Digital sound subsystem = =20 snd_hda_load=3D"YES" # Intel High Definition Audio = (Controller) =20 snd_driver_load=3D"YES" # All sound drivers and even after multiple reboots, cat /dev/sndstat reports: root:~ # cat /dev/sndstat = =20 Installed devices: = =20 root:~ # and: root:/boot # kldstat=20 Id Refs Address Size Name 1 94 0xffffffff80200000 1618b88 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff81819000 24d888 zfs.ko 3 2 0xffffffff81a67000 6658 opensolaris.ko 4 1 0xffffffff81a6e000 3fe8 snd_driver.ko 5 2 0xffffffff81a72000 89c0 snd_vibes.ko 6 2 0xffffffff81a7b000 7918 snd_via82c686.ko 7 2 0xffffffff81a83000 83d0 snd_t4dwave.ko 8 4 0xffffffff81a8c000 2850 snd_spicds.ko 9 2 0xffffffff81a8f000 a788 snd_solo.ko 10 5 0xffffffff81a9a000 60c8 snd_sbc.ko 11 2 0xffffffff81aa1000 80d0 snd_sb8.ko 12 2 0xffffffff81aaa000 8120 snd_sb16.ko 13 2 0xffffffff81ab3000 14e88 snd_neomagic.ko 14 3 0xffffffff81ac8000 16850 snd_mss.ko 15 2 0xffffffff81adf000 e7d0 snd_maestro3.ko 16 2 0xffffffff81aee000 d598 snd_maestro.ko 17 2 0xffffffff81afc000 7268 snd_fm801.ko 18 2 0xffffffff81b04000 a8b0 snd_ess.ko 19 2 0xffffffff81b0f000 c9b8 snd_envy24ht.ko 20 2 0xffffffff81b1c000 dfd0 snd_envy24.ko 21 2 0xffffffff81b2a000 fdf8 snd_ds1.ko 22 2 0xffffffff81b3a000 82b0 snd_cs4281.ko 23 2 0xffffffff81b43000 a308 snd_atiixp.ko 24 2 0xffffffff81b4e000 8ee8 snd_als4000.ko 25 2 0xffffffff81b57000 b880 snd_ad1816.ko (no snd_hda in there?) I'm running 10.0 STABLE on an Intel NUC D54250WYK (amd64) Thanks for any insights! Steve On 09 Oct 2014, at 01:07, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: >=20 >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: >>>=20 >>>> For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should >>>> reload the driver. But which one? >>>=20 >>> = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.htm= l >>=20 >> Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and >> the kernel modules I have available. >=20 > The important part is > cat /dev/sndstat >=20 > But for most motherboards, adding > snd_hda_load=3D"YES" >=20 > to /boot/loader.conf is enough. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 23:54:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B1DE26 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE20F9 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id mk6so142958lab.15 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VKrgoZ4wQELkDZ1p/szEOdzVosQF4TDhUpel2igDofk=; b=cBgNtoxZHA+wKHijm/L5cgBaALkc6Q4WeI0mKu+DH60BmqUTqO/fpSapXKfbckDoS1 jUdeaS6RKEx2rtUFiGnVYzplH6PhuNv7l/rerenO1eMkhSv61haGqmq4sTUjOlxL2IqK MMF2g2w0heGEyQuiZOSz5W3Dt0dfTqj/NP63A6pnXHw5KFLxj/DKGNaGooajZjgaOACG Yxf9LcltRxqMoUXcsC3KvyaSScvjs2df8RtGPU6Htfc4WJyG6Hn5qwhlT9APDsZjnOOo mUFYNzdmLyB7OgBJQt7qVLRRXnUeHT0Z9sDXsG76i6hHed0/+gl3NXJrRoWDH9O5ccUb YYVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.203.204 with SMTP id ks12mr15096692lac.65.1412812479474; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.132 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:54:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? From: Waitman Gobble To: Stephen Riehm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , David Benfell X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:54:42 -0000 Try ports/audio/oss - it's a much newer version than oss in base. Many more features, and there's an x mixer that's really great. Caveat - might not use the drivers in ports/audio/oss if you have any sort of usb sound device (microphone, speakers, etc.) Last time I experimented with it would cause bad things to happen. (You can use the mixer and ossinfo tool without using the drivers in the port., eg. ossxmix and ossinfo) Waitman On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Stephen Riehm wrote: > Hi, > > I'm also a bit lost with this. (Yes I've also read the sound-setup > handbook) > My /boot/loader.conf consists of: > > autoboot_delay="2" > zfs_load="YES" > sound_load="YES" # Digital sound subsystem > snd_hda_load="YES" # Intel High Definition Audio (Controller) > snd_driver_load="YES" # All sound drivers > > and even after multiple reboots, cat /dev/sndstat reports: > > root:~ # cat /dev/sndstat > Installed devices: > root:~ # > > and: > > root:/boot # kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 94 0xffffffff80200000 1618b88 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff81819000 24d888 zfs.ko > 3 2 0xffffffff81a67000 6658 opensolaris.ko > 4 1 0xffffffff81a6e000 3fe8 snd_driver.ko > 5 2 0xffffffff81a72000 89c0 snd_vibes.ko > 6 2 0xffffffff81a7b000 7918 snd_via82c686.ko > 7 2 0xffffffff81a83000 83d0 snd_t4dwave.ko > 8 4 0xffffffff81a8c000 2850 snd_spicds.ko > 9 2 0xffffffff81a8f000 a788 snd_solo.ko > 10 5 0xffffffff81a9a000 60c8 snd_sbc.ko > 11 2 0xffffffff81aa1000 80d0 snd_sb8.ko > 12 2 0xffffffff81aaa000 8120 snd_sb16.ko > 13 2 0xffffffff81ab3000 14e88 snd_neomagic.ko > 14 3 0xffffffff81ac8000 16850 snd_mss.ko > 15 2 0xffffffff81adf000 e7d0 snd_maestro3.ko > 16 2 0xffffffff81aee000 d598 snd_maestro.ko > 17 2 0xffffffff81afc000 7268 snd_fm801.ko > 18 2 0xffffffff81b04000 a8b0 snd_ess.ko > 19 2 0xffffffff81b0f000 c9b8 snd_envy24ht.ko > 20 2 0xffffffff81b1c000 dfd0 snd_envy24.ko > 21 2 0xffffffff81b2a000 fdf8 snd_ds1.ko > 22 2 0xffffffff81b3a000 82b0 snd_cs4281.ko > 23 2 0xffffffff81b43000 a308 snd_atiixp.ko > 24 2 0xffffffff81b4e000 8ee8 snd_als4000.ko > 25 2 0xffffffff81b57000 b880 snd_ad1816.ko > > (no snd_hda in there?) > > I'm running 10.0 STABLE on an Intel NUC D54250WYK (amd64) > > Thanks for any insights! > > Steve > > On 09 Oct 2014, at 01:07, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > >>> > >>>> For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > >>>> reload the driver. But which one? > >>> > >>> > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html > >> > >> Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have and > >> the kernel modules I have available. > > > > The important part is > > cat /dev/sndstat > > > > But for most motherboards, adding > > snd_hda_load="YES" > > > > to /boot/loader.conf is enough. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 00:13:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 864141A5 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1666E2C5 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [84.131.114.99] (helo=[192.168.42.90]) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc1Kz-0007gd-2C; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:12:09 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? From: Stephen Riehm In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:12:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19E5161B-5154-48DB-80F6-5E24B2DFB28B@opensauce.de> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008220048.GB39434@home.parts-unknown.org> To: Waitman Gobble X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAb3BlbnNhdWNlLmRl Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , David Benfell X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:13:18 -0000 Thanks for the tip, but sadly, no dice :-( I just discovered another post which mentioned "dmidecode" - looking = through that I see: On Board Device 3 Information Type: Sound Status: Disabled Description: Realtek High Definition Audio Device ... Onboard Device Reference Designation: AUDIO1 Type: Sound Status: Disabled Type Instance: 1 Bus Address: 0000:00:1b.0 so by the looks of it, the device(s) are disabled in the BIOS (which I = sadly can't access due to a BIOS bug). Thanks anyway, Steve On 09 Oct 2014, at 01:54, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Try ports/audio/oss - it's a much newer version than oss in base. Many = more features, and there's an x mixer that's really great. Caveat - = might not use the drivers in ports/audio/oss if you have any sort of usb = sound device (microphone, speakers, etc.) Last time I experimented with = it would cause bad things to happen. (You can use the mixer and ossinfo = tool without using the drivers in the port., eg. ossxmix and ossinfo) >=20 > Waitman >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Stephen Riehm = wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm also a bit lost with this. (Yes I've also read the sound-setup = handbook) > My /boot/loader.conf consists of: >=20 > autoboot_delay=3D"2" > zfs_load=3D"YES" > sound_load=3D"YES" # Digital sound subsystem > snd_hda_load=3D"YES" # Intel High Definition Audio = (Controller) > snd_driver_load=3D"YES" # All sound drivers >=20 > and even after multiple reboots, cat /dev/sndstat reports: >=20 > root:~ # cat /dev/sndstat > Installed devices: > root:~ # >=20 > and: >=20 > root:/boot # kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 94 0xffffffff80200000 1618b88 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff81819000 24d888 zfs.ko > 3 2 0xffffffff81a67000 6658 opensolaris.ko > 4 1 0xffffffff81a6e000 3fe8 snd_driver.ko > 5 2 0xffffffff81a72000 89c0 snd_vibes.ko > 6 2 0xffffffff81a7b000 7918 snd_via82c686.ko > 7 2 0xffffffff81a83000 83d0 snd_t4dwave.ko > 8 4 0xffffffff81a8c000 2850 snd_spicds.ko > 9 2 0xffffffff81a8f000 a788 snd_solo.ko > 10 5 0xffffffff81a9a000 60c8 snd_sbc.ko > 11 2 0xffffffff81aa1000 80d0 snd_sb8.ko > 12 2 0xffffffff81aaa000 8120 snd_sb16.ko > 13 2 0xffffffff81ab3000 14e88 snd_neomagic.ko > 14 3 0xffffffff81ac8000 16850 snd_mss.ko > 15 2 0xffffffff81adf000 e7d0 snd_maestro3.ko > 16 2 0xffffffff81aee000 d598 snd_maestro.ko > 17 2 0xffffffff81afc000 7268 snd_fm801.ko > 18 2 0xffffffff81b04000 a8b0 snd_ess.ko > 19 2 0xffffffff81b0f000 c9b8 snd_envy24ht.ko > 20 2 0xffffffff81b1c000 dfd0 snd_envy24.ko > 21 2 0xffffffff81b2a000 fdf8 snd_ds1.ko > 22 2 0xffffffff81b3a000 82b0 snd_cs4281.ko > 23 2 0xffffffff81b43000 a308 snd_atiixp.ko > 24 2 0xffffffff81b4e000 8ee8 snd_als4000.ko > 25 2 0xffffffff81b57000 b880 snd_ad1816.ko >=20 > (no snd_hda in there?) >=20 > I'm running 10.0 STABLE on an Intel NUC D54250WYK (amd64) >=20 > Thanks for any insights! >=20 > Steve >=20 > On 09 Oct 2014, at 01:07, Warren Block wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, David Benfell wrote: > >>> > >>>> For some reason, sound has stopped working and I assume I should > >>>> reload the driver. But which one? > >>> > >>> = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.htm= l > >> > >> Been there. There is no obvious match between the hardware I have = and > >> the kernel modules I have available. > > > > The important part is > > cat /dev/sndstat > > > > But for most motherboards, adding > > snd_hda_load=3D"YES" > > > > to /boot/loader.conf is enough. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 02:43:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB12E42C for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vfemail.net (nine.vfemail.net [108.76.175.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8E924B for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82463 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2014 02:36:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Oct 2014 02:36:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 82393 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2014 02:35:53 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 82386, pid: 82390, t: 0.0131s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp102-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.62) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 9 Oct 2014 02:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 1948 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2014 02:35:53 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 1931, pid: 1945, t: 0.7153s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO nil) (amJlaWNoQHZmZW1haWwubmV0@172.16.100.27) by 172.16.100.62 with ESMTPA; 9 Oct 2014 02:35:52 -0000 From: Jan Beich To: "Jeremy C. Reed" Subject: Re: using code coverage with clang References: Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:35:49 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:25:29 +0000 Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:43:02 -0000 (redirected from -questions@ to -toolchain@) "Jeremy C. Reed" writes: > When I changed from FreeBSD 9.x to 10.0-RELEASE-p1, I went from gcc to > clang. But this causes > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/../lib/libprofile_rt.a: No such file: No such file > or directory > > I don't have that library. Any suggestions on how to get it so I don't > have to maintain later during upgrades. I don't think the clang ports > have it either. With recent Clang the error may error slightly different: $ clang35 foo.c -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage /usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/local/llvm35/bin/../lib/clang/3.5.0/lib/freebsd/libclang_rt.profile-amd64.a: No such file or directory clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) Try installing one of lang/gcc* and adding --rtlib=libgcc to link flags. --rtlib=compiler-rt requires more recent compiler-rt version than the one shipped with FreeBSD base. There's an upstream bug but the patches there have bitrotten to being mostly useless (predate --rtlib support). http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6122 Anyway, freebsd-toolchain@ folk probably know more about the state of Clang coverage/profiling on FreeBSD such as: - devel/compiler-rt being more ancient than version in base on 10.0R - lang/clang* trying to use libgcc_p instead of libs from lang/gcc* - coverage/profiling not agreeing on whether to use libgcc/compiler-rt https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2013-September/001030.html > > I'd prefer to not maintain all my dependencies (ports) using gcc. > (Currently I cannot use gcc with the clang-built ports as some libraries > appear to be built differently so references aren't seen the same.) > Try either converting USE_GCC=yes ports to USES=compiler:gcc-c++11-lib or adding -nostdinc++ -isystem/usr/include/c++/v1 to CXXFLAGS and creating /usr/lib/libstdc++.so -> libc++.so symlink. > Does anyone have suggestions for doing code coverage with clang? Maybe pmcannotate(8) or dtrace(1) as compiler-agnostic alternatives. > > Or are there binary packages available for 10.0 on amd64 built with gcc? > > (I found a forum discussion about it at > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=47260 and several other > reports about it.) ------------------------------------------------- VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 03:54:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD185519 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 03:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CE1B84 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 03:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3jCz1L0xzBzbH for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:49:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:49:09 -0400 From: Daniel Staal Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:54:29 -0000 --As of October 7, 2014 6:48:51 PM -0700, Nick Sivo is alleged to have said: > I've been having trouble with ZFS on my server. For the most part it > works splendidly, but occasionally I'll experience permanent hangs. > > > For example, right now on one of my ZFS filesystems (the others are > fine), I can read, write, and stat files, but if I run ls in any > directory, ls and the terminal will hang. CTRL-C, and kill -9 can't kill > it: --As for the rest, it is mine. Not sure if this will be helpful, but at least it shouldn't hurt: When was the last time you ran a scrub? Also, how much RAM do you have and where is your swap? (The only times I've had permanent hangs from ZFS was when I ran out of RAM and was trying to swap to ZFS...) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 04:28:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F97C0F for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF29E2A for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id h3so1968692igd.5 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ycombinator.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eK7u71Z8MR7L1o3fUQDokKfj9C9bBt2xlkR7XuKwlIo=; b=Hg5lDUQQ70ZZApKoZCo1iMtRWuoDdptfsOO5GF3VewJS9SK4FsyJ/v4KRFXJD14Xk4 wS4bKleWA4HnEgRnvtqD/17Ijg+XMotNw1rh71Op/4OZJFxBZunLkjqhuGY/soe1ddNJ c/XQWw0+MeQ9eQv/yJT68Lej3Zpi6wf5MdlKE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eK7u71Z8MR7L1o3fUQDokKfj9C9bBt2xlkR7XuKwlIo=; b=mAv9INVWGIEiwgcGxp4ewzz45S/Rj2AeojSi3iGvnlUP4D3B6QB3+SUOr93wrd9OUx s7jSiyusaxe88xRs4NAtNW/OenArBjigT5pOWqGIhv8yR5qhgiWqoQiXtD4FV7phP3DE fu4Az0ilgEGhPkXkJrxrzx5xDv/jRQybQ3GsrKKd3prJdduNL9GtJ5Fnnac15RDP0FUY R7DiqnVgQx20hB7yzz6rUcRdbtee4Q0bKQSorzZb4fTif4hqP93++HjiWRCBxMwUZAkE R9t4FHG6sMZ3XQUzN2CTVqzXIjElVWDtQlp8j1BRoZjncQf1Gsnq5rkUV9fXEsiun9KI Iaag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkWUc6DjcKeFqHWO9jXpgLqadVRZ8Fmvmndfi8ZBoN79fVGwIV46f6MX9jGbghQcd1q9bAf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.10.37 with SMTP id f5mr14484098pdb.5.1412828885659; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.131.130 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:28:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? From: Nick Sivo To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 04:28:06 -0000 Hi Daniel, > Not sure if this will be helpful, but at least it shouldn't hurt: When was > the last time you ran a scrub? Also, how much RAM do you have and where is > your swap? (The only times I've had permanent hangs from ZFS was when I ran > out of RAM and was trying to swap to ZFS...) The server has 64GB ECC RAM, and no swap at the moment. I've since rebooted the box, but a scrub today revealed no errors, and there was nothing in the console or any log files about disk or controller errors or timeouts. I was able to get kernel call stacks with procstat: https://gist.github.com/kogir/49ff76f95b0b3be3e80e Thanks, Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 06:30:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50DDB5 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 06:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC116C0D for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 06:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 267E262BEF41; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:30:17 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Polytropon Subject: SOLVED: Re: How do I tell which driver I need for sound? Message-ID: <20141009063017.GA3411@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141008204214.GA93107@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141008225223.b2157804.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008225223.b2157804.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:30:18 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:42:14 -0700, David Benfell wrote: > > pcm1: (play/rec) default > >=20 >=20 > It's probably the HDA driver, see "man snd_hda"... This proved correct. I wound up rebooting sooner than I would have expected for unrelated reasons and so tested my snd_hda-reliant configuration. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUNit4AAoJEBV64x4SNmAr+z0P/RJp9UTBQDudrpQMsPbnY2nd Y3nUvbexRt97KB+EHluUpyusx+PUfwazC39peozgrFN3Afn7Twf9SZvOPC18OlUF LF5hQq1PX5/WfSlQtNCgjkbPC2zaJnCsysU1lhGUq3bGmGogjYTj3UR6ldZ6u2X4 7hJT7t7LKouhZw8p0IxzA8jJjS8CyRJErtVuaXuQGPcCPdw/c8CQ1zeGH7SMkmsG cVxIKVJwcLGQ0QHSVdnZieMIs7sD7fQrywkeTlwarE/BB0AjN7Eel9I3EVv88BVY HFZYuk4wGXfqe4upeVCkEvAU2xbqgNI/fUJdjhSR1EjBbfj9ZLKQ2gPfL51uMFkk dKI8An1XN4g7cCcjWLe/mpnfHBz2mAGSkF/gGUQuJ+B5R/pMyetk9XLEwfmaOy8F D4xbDBkNvMID/PtbwZ9aaiWwZVCtJqtVFhP0yqT7GrVTS9hiC9OwWtPPOlN4DWCe mmakZ4RJ63BfCUP8SpexsVT7JeaXlYj6SeR2iY9XmYh/txfQ7Rg31RMdQ70xIg9D 23ekJ5St85Af4rTv4xy6E6U4sa8TwqT0mwtV2R9Xnn/0nqFzxmEQIUEJjQ/JpDod vm4061aIpz90YK1fo+6pdJ8VVrd36kdisgdYxPcf0AjxWZxryuQcR6SU5HvxGLou K8XDEkpffegqmQ/LXoC+ =RHtQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 14:13:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDCF98A9 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.michaelwlucas.com (mail.michaelwlucas.com [108.61.84.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 891662E0 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.michaelwlucas.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.michaelwlucas.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s99EDUtZ005740 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:13:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@mail.michaelwlucas.com) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by mail.michaelwlucas.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s99EDUpC005739 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:13:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:13:30 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: GBDE protecting the user? Message-ID: <20141009141330.GA5655@mail.michaelwlucas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.michaelwlucas.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:13:38 -0000 Hi, Been playing with GBDE a while, trying to make it protect me. One of the features of GBDE is that it should "provide tangible feedback" that the data has been destroyed. (See PHK's paper at http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs/bsdcon-03.gbde.paper.pdf, section 4.1.) The man page doesn't mention this, so what the heck, I decided to play with it. Creating GBDE devices is very simple. # gbde init /dev/gpt/encrypted -L /etc/encrypted.lock I created a filesystem, mounted it, put files on it, unmounted. There's two operations to wipe out a GBDE: nuke and destroy. Nuke looks like the right thing. I nuke all the keys: # gbde nuke gpt/encrypted -l /etc/encrypted.lock -n -1 Enter passphrase: Opened with key 0 Nuked key 0 Nuked key 1 Nuked key 2 Nuked key 3 # gbde attach gpt/encrypted -l /etc/encrypted.lock Enter passphrase: # The .bde device isn't there, and my filesystem is gone. But I received no confirmation that the keys were destroyed. I also didn't get a message that the device couldn't be attached, although it clearly isn't. Fine. Let's try gbde destroy. gbde init /dev/gpt/encrypted -L /etc/encrypted.lock Enter new passphrase: Reenter new passphrase: # gbde destroy gpt/encrypted -l /etc/encrypted.lock Enter passphrase: Opened with key 0 # gbde attach gpt/encrypted -l /etc/encrypted.lock Enter passphrase: # The device isn't attached, it just fails silently. Did I misunderstand the GBDE functionality? Am I missing something daft? Has this code just decayed with GELI's arrival? Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 17:22:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36971366 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E078FE2F for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web14g.yandex.ru (web14g.yandex.ru [95.108.252.114]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 923751041128 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:22:41 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web14g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 29F90BC0688; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:22:41 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412875361; bh=rhVSCmHrIDWIZVrKONrcZmP/yGw2Q5TOa2EH3P8A53o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=sCQ1plkh74XJUGaetVT8a6XXIs74YInaUYTbAv3Ig76QdbR0g3s+6RwCKk4fD+FdP FV4w0dMc2bcJ3F8/da8yBVpcCS8W/t5sM/LDgo6/CBnnYTsYqatEpz+trO6klT/5xR RUILoWRteCE010WqrsgrlVjF332sqfEnTdZSPn1k= Received: from tsn46-166-168-245.dyn.nltelcom.net (tsn46-166-168-245.dyn.nltelcom.net [46.166.186.245]) by web14g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:22:40 +0400 From: Martin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <214461412875360@web14g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:22:40 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:22:54 -0000 I am faced with the strangest problem. I have a Linux box that serves samba. On the box all samba users belongs to "users" group and all files contain the same properties. Everyone in the group has full read and write access. When I mount the share from Linux or Windows using the same account all is well, but when I mount the same share using FreeBSD, only about half of the files are visible. I don't mean they are hidden and all "map" properties are off. When I do a "ls -l" only half of the files show up. If I do a full path ls, because I KNOW the file is there, ie.: ls -l /mnt/share/foo.pdf Then I can see it, but if I only do a: ls -l /mnt/share/ It doesn't show up. I have been scratching my head for two days trying to figure out what in the world is going on. I tried viewing the share with a GUI filemanger from the same FreeBSD box, and then MORE files show up, but still not all of them. I am pretty confident this isn't a file permission problem because the problem persists even with a setting of 777. When I do a "ls -ln" to get the uid and gid of the files, on the Linux box, all files contains the same uid and gid, which is the uid of the "users" group. I am running FreeBSD 10.1-RC1 with "samba36-smbclient-3.6.24" and I am mounting with: mount -t smbfs //user@foo-box/share /mnt/share In smb.conf on Linux I have: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = %h server dns proxy = no interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 eth0 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 syslog = 0 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d security = user encrypt passwords = true passdb backend = tdbsam obey pam restrictions = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . pam password change = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 strict sync = no sync always = no printable = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null [pub1] path=/share browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = foo admin users = foo create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0775 Why can the file manager GUI see more files than "ls"? And why in the world can't they both see all the files? Where do I go from here? How do I determine if this is a "mount_smbfs" bug, a samba bug, or something else? Kind regards Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 19:28:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329603F6 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [95.108.253.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8429DE8 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web28g.yandex.ru (web28g.yandex.ru [95.108.253.237]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3176A1041A94 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:28:07 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web28g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id BC9877A0A41; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:28:06 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412882886; bh=s2s1NXYPmZZrzxdCAso8Jzb2sdW8N5SuvvCuSEyYQuw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=HQ/+i4O4COQsCgddpdwnTuhzUJ0clfR+6cg3TnGZ9P2afenhjfIImdSm32Y1nrxnr 6X+Ba5OGbUtTGYDxsAaUeE7Og8hNZCPCmlqGMoNZB25i9euhRE6GhhHI7QAIph+QaF 2YlZ+fPfnGfXZcRNgesvK0HPFS102L2WLo/houew= Received: from tsn109-201-154-191.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-154-191.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.154.191]) by web28g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:28:06 +0400 From: Martin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:28:06 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:28:12 -0000 If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can gain access to the share and see all the files from there. This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of "mount_smbfs". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:21:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C61C1195 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB015FE for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q200so1045911ykb.36 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=meOa9gePE2I4iEysstRk0sh3x772dDwiP3YVaZ/TWAQ=; b=zIMqU0eSNTXijoqNtvOlg06hVkgC0AOqaTXHhvJrmqV1OyhwlSSyddtbTWUz1U2Pey qmPEcWWjWTJrv4tFOIQG2++jqeINZnsCo+lQYEIK2TKDRQYEe6gW/A7et5BTlSFaoRjL MP8P1XF86whbPx+RmLu+YHK0uOu0UvJTDlfy/4K19pYqyzQ9VQLFkwFHT2Wb8h4KVApc CkRF4eGRFWle/yLEP0KapJgAICDwIkChJd2TnbCDxGQmaG4egnRScmWZS1rpg7iX+9QT egoURDc68IndAQjZuWBT33JqH3iJYVv874DIASrTyz7kK8BpwB9NH0O7Sgatj8DbKg8b er2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.128.238 with SMTP id f74mr686735yhi.192.1412886072546; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.118.77 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:21:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:21:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:21:13 -0000 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Martin wrote: > If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can > gain access to the share and see all the files from there. > > This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of > "mount_smbfs". > You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in FreeBSD by exporting them also by NFS from the server . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:25:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDC4280 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EBC863E for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-103.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s99KPgKt003838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:25:43 -0500 Message-ID: <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:57 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:25:50 -0000 On 10/09/14 15:21, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Martin wrote: > >> If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can >> gain access to the share and see all the files from there. >> >> This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of >> "mount_smbfs". >> > > > You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in FreeBSD > by exporting them also by NFS from the server . > > > > Thank you very much . > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > True, he said as much in his OP, but if he needs M$FT boxen to see those files, he needs smbfs/mount_smbfs/etc. working correctly .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:27:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AE8325 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412DE65E for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-103.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s99KRUTt004699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:27:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5436F129.1030205@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:33:45 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:27:32 -0000 On 10/09/14 15:31, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/09/14 15:21, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Martin >> wrote: >> >>> If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can >>> gain access to the share and see all the files from there. >>> >>> This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of >>> "mount_smbfs". >>> >> >> >> You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in >> FreeBSD >> by exporting them also by NFS from the server . >> >> >> >> Thank you very much . >> >> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > True, he said as much in his OP, but if he needs M$FT boxen to see > those files, he needs smbfs/mount_smbfs/etc. working correctly .... > > *Aaaaaaaack* !!!! He was trying to mount them w/ FBSD (not sure why), not M$FT, sorry for the noise :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:30:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48057412 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com (mail-yh0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE3F695 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a41so1114093yho.37 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Vc8Qqh7olqZOJg01HltT8GAKyugHj60p7ndKI0K5zwo=; b=wVf2NvH1s+be0MeNZDlv3Q3tU0ogUojkLV8Rn4ncoFQTys5soyYzatlmzQAF88LnVV vVG2agKltqka8nlbn1mHW6uyOH2/3HvLlUGqfAy7gc0RUKZUjsED2sV+wHROziOY3olw PXrg3QvsHqAdU8nsYeYT8tF/MXLs3OnOXxhgWGQXnFaCJO6haX0RiwbMkl4faeREb1yQ 5ZXTEmS69yD+H6VCseiDMAblpWh43Z2nhf/fPymEshdf8Aa4bF0cX7BImzmXd2W0qPDp HEF4rMIdnj1Sqh0ycJhoORJXX8N7wk2F5aCSNO2DFnneGrVXc6KqVxNfarVIvPC149ZR 9gig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.63.198 with SMTP id a46mr980811yhd.28.1412886640186; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.118.77 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:30:42 -0000 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:31 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/09/14 15:21, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Martin >> wrote: >> >> If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can >>> gain access to the share and see all the files from there. >>> >>> This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of >>> "mount_smbfs". >>> >>> >> >> You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in FreeBSD >> by exporting them also by NFS from the server . >> >> >> >> Thank you very much . >> >> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > True, he said as much in his OP, but if he needs M$FT boxen to see those > files, he needs smbfs/mount_smbfs/etc. working correctly .... > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > The same directories may be exported to Windows by Samba and to other operating systems by NFS ( both Samba and NFS servers should work at the server computer ) . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:36:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F03852A for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BE57C3 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q9so1060385ykb.9 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4M3XoIPqUiaK1YBWL4+0nfguSezcV32IeQQd1gtOz1Y=; b=uiKgG1O19FJuJT+zKjKIHZU/RuhNSbDCHbsS/9JaV6+L1Jo1qrcRdzVf/CNVwAGM0L mONwvfBz+aXjQni4+bL8ILSgRJ5UZrr5HjisXQL5qcnrhb6oLzwiKLYeJUh+kHE8Uzo/ zv81pUga8O4o30bEnuuxLpX38WiidzfeWJ0n5g+h3R1l/J7jMYOt1YOq1vyeWw/rF8pI JPf/S21NyFlgIbX0QhgwAyIW+kdxWorUtYeabxw42A27sWsKfkQX7eEcG8Or3Y+tB5++ /DdHR5CYyAgOn6keJkF/ntR0X3JsYcBGaK2UCShnNtGgjBQWKfVFvalQYXYh0V4o1EFI uF0w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.229.138 with SMTP id h10mr847539yhq.122.1412886968023; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.118.77 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5436F129.1030205@hiwaay.net> References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> <5436F0BD.5000300@hiwaay.net> <5436F129.1030205@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:36:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:36:09 -0000 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:33 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/09/14 15:31, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 10/09/14 15:21, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Martin >>> wrote: >>> >>> If I use Midnight Commander (mc) and use the SMB function it has, I can >>>> gain access to the share and see all the files from there. >>>> >>>> This IMHO shows I am dealing with some strange kind of behavior of >>>> "mount_smbfs". >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in >>> FreeBSD >>> by exporting them also by NFS from the server . >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you very much . >>> >>> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> >> True, he said as much in his OP, but if he needs M$FT boxen to see those >> files, he needs smbfs/mount_smbfs/etc. working correctly .... >> >> >> > > *Aaaaaaaack* !!!! He was trying to mount them w/ FBSD (not sure why), not > M$FT, sorry for the noise :-/ .... > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > If the same directories may be seen by NFS and NOT by Samba in FreeBSD , this shows that there is a problem in Samba port of FreeBSD . Personally I could not be able to connect to a Windows XP share from FreeBSD Samba client ( I could NOT be able to understand which side is causing the trouble ) . It is possible to connect to FreeBSD Samba server from Windows XP . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:55:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D486C75 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A56C9A7 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23j.yandex.ru (web23j.yandex.ru [5.45.198.64]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 449C8C21679; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:55:46 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id A24C7490027A; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:55:45 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412888145; bh=1BDxMn5tFnjQonMxREglJI6hx/GDZb5fEE/D/fJ1YfU=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=EcgUo8ahQaqJp0MibX2gIfFos+FN2138Jb+bGfR0GTY2VeiHOLbTZaQJ+CT1VUFoI t8bCb9B7WEerEHVpg7y3ufJ+gDqYlNngH4R5eWWsQQOfWJ4QCZYDkmIqnqwfFt2/zt ETRI1GTJYDsB1zTsCrXzpj2S7EctTfZF0CWSDp00= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web23j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:55:45 +0400 From: Martin To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk In-Reply-To: References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible Message-Id: <554091412888145@web23j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:55:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:55:51 -0000 > You may see the same directories by NFS instead of Samba client in FreeBSD by exporting them also by NFS from the server . >Thank you very much . > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Maybe you're trying to be helpful, or maybe you're just really annoying right now! I could just as well export using ssh or ftp and even mount them too, that's not the point. Those FreeBSD boxes needs to access those samba shares. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 20:57:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24483D2E for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C955C9D4 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23j.yandex.ru (web23j.yandex.ru [5.45.198.64]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EB4B61980C6D; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:57:33 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6B2DD490027A; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:57:33 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412888253; bh=RglEVSPC5D1PwCoVBZig5wbkeMjas5WhEUUGLBZ9Sxk=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=d8BpD5008n6mdE3o/gT53wBYAbdzGi0aTrjHVDVdqSft8MkOLKki7Xv3cNSWw/nEY s5GN/QYkT000/yQMZvktUyB+cfhlHKDC085B/+MWixAWfr8xwZ0Po+HG/5trmWmdq4 Wkgpdfztq6p84gC7+zrkY1U6R2E7Fq7tVUDUcSuU= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web23j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:57:33 +0400 From: Martin To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk In-Reply-To: References: <423111412882886@web28g.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible Message-Id: <555971412888253@web23j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:57:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:57:38 -0000 > The same directories may be exported to Windows by Samba and to other > operating systems by NFS > ( both Samba and NFS servers should work at the server computer ) . That would be a really poor way of setting things up as each technology really h andles file permissions different, besides, as stated before, irrelevant. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 21:06:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311872AD for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8408B1A for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web23j.yandex.ru (web23j.yandex.ru [5.45.198.64]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6B993198049E for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:06:41 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web23j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 073C34900276; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:06:40 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412888801; bh=50xV9XOYVg6h0e77qLElVi7zTmlMy12ZIHOGwxBkRHg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=ZpQKi/LV5+DIrOnjL1GHALQr+/+FkKbOT47CXErPXqDBdfY6ZMMkY71SC4svk2SS4 sTpcNujPQwk25rAInlSGkQ+D3fNdAxwUSDZfsSby80B0flny2G7+r7OZjPtX/21CYN vqcloEyjKol0nYTndO8f3DXzeSwT0JzP8D9KMe4k= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web23j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:06:40 +0400 From: Martin Hanson To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:06:40 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:06:44 -0000 I have installed a box with FreeBSD 10.0 stable just to test and the problem resides. I have also tried creating some new users on the Linux Samba box and granting them access to the shares. Mounting using their credentials with mount_smbfs creates the same problem. Using smbclient works. Mounting from a Linux box using "cifs-utils" ie. "mount -t cifs" also works. I am beginning to suspect mount_smbfs. A directory containing a lot of files, all with the same credentials, only about half shows up if mounted using a FreeBSD 10.0 or 10.1-RC1 mount_smbfs no matter what user mounts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 21:56:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D42C211B for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85018141 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web5h.yandex.ru (web5h.yandex.ru [84.201.186.34]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 83A79701E87 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:55:50 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web5h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0FE103840CAF; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:55:49 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412891750; bh=QAi/+/vMTYAUx4qbYGpOuZu37kjYTGiD8P3ULeFbZQw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=jHxmoDbX0LvQyAsfR+kuB0E9SxWEId0xpdmcavpyRoyU5l3ExgL0DA4zc9GbkBH28 SaNizJc57OxAOvngUllOJifEcAcJD3c0nW8pjN1bqY1Oq9EfjPSK53fXDetQnoutlT J8cJ6HC+Zsjrq93izlrUnCsh8FWHIrjvVgHmX0IE= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web5h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:55:49 +0400 From: Martin Hanson To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <457841412891749@web5h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:55:49 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:56:02 -0000 Now it becomes even stranger. I mounted the share, went into it and tried renaming one of the visible directories. Afterwards NONE of the files or directories show: $ mv PythonGame PythonGame2 $ ls -l total 0 Some really strange stuff is going on with mount_smbfs and I cannot continue wasting more time on this problem. If I can't solve this problem soon none of the FreeBSD boxes are useable in our setting. The only thing I haven't tried is 11.0, but I seriously doubt mount_smbfs has been changed that much. What can possible result in all files in a directory going invisible because of a rename? Kind regards Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 22:01:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27ABA220 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA42920D for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web5h.yandex.ru (web5h.yandex.ru [84.201.186.34]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8CF13700274; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:01:45 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web5h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id E3E553840D2F; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:01:44 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412892105; bh=cprGq6yzAC0rakX73ToezZTGs7B0VE3cxLxH4XcKOeM=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=c7oaagJlaqkfGbIRfoanoFJPWGfUde9VAPNsJoa31LPgwOxieg3xQ+VXzGsQCHJYv KSKH3fiihECrb+vDrX5KHduOIJExLQNu50dzujG/M9yi7cxMpGR2SGcV3vbf425qR4 HxGB6vlr6/+r62NfOzw7yTLakzBFgoU0cY1PaXFY= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web5h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:01:44 +0400 From: Martin Hanson To: Michael Ross , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <459991412892104@web5h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:01:44 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:01:50 -0000 > But you can see more of these files when you use a GUI viewer, > and with MC you can see all of them, if I read you right. > > Could this be charset related, i. e. do the files in question > have any, like, utf-8 characters in their names? > And MC decodes these filesnames correctly, > your GUI viewer decodes some of them correctly, > and the console doesn't do it at all? > > If it works better with a GUI then in the console, > and the GUI accesses the smbfs mount, > it is probably not the fault of mount_smbfs. > > Michael Hi Michael Thank you for a very clever suggestion. I suspected as much, but even files created from the console in the mounted share doesn't show up. So doing a simple 'echo "hello" > foo.txt' doesn't show up, but if I do "ls -l foo.txt" it shows. Also since my last follow up all files has become invisible, even to the GUI file manager. $ ls -l total 0 $ cat foo.txt hello This is really strange. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 22:15:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C28458 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward18.mail.yandex.net (forward18.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C06344 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web27g.yandex.ru (web27g.yandex.ru [95.108.253.236]) by forward18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E22D31780258; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:15:22 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web27g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 605E2530073F; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:15:22 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1412892922; bh=RmBDG3dHiRSTRRilAkseUxTaYyqcb6dBSaxzDmK85RI=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=Ok2oKJggLmiU9kklQQ1zEA9RlrjkpdvQKXr9uBruz23bwdWcLhCuiGu5BgvAfn5qv yBOEIMl5qk6DJ2XbPpvVU8bkRlhTHZ8VVkU4DVPtwY/o2F+NZrX/07/83GcQ/f2n6v x8hOo6CFjgHzuFr2etSEW7f2FMnyRRj4rO/2Zz9Q= Received: from tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com (tsn109-201-152-16.dyn.nltelcom.com [109.201.152.16]) by web27g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:15:22 +0400 From: Martin Hanson To: Michael Ross , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> Subject: [SOLVED] Mounting samba, some files are invisible MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <589291412892922@web27g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:15:22 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:15:37 -0000 > But you can see more of these files when you use a GUI viewer, > and with MC you can see all of them, if I read you right. > > Could this be charset related, i. e. do the files in question > have any, like, utf-8 characters in their names? > And MC decodes these filesnames correctly, > your GUI viewer decodes some of them correctly, > and the console doesn't do it at all? > > If it works better with a GUI then in the console, > and the GUI accesses the smbfs mount, > it is probably not the fault of mount_smbfs. > > Michael Michael, thank you very very very much!! I kept investigating and mounting with this setting solved the problem: mount_smbfs -E iso-8859-1:iso-8859-1 Doing a locale on the FreeBSD box gives: LANG= LC_CTYPE="C" LC_COLLATE="C" LC_TIME="C" LC_NUMERIC="C" LC_MONETARY="C" LC_MESSAGES="C" LC_ALL= And I remember it being setup with ISO-8859-1. The Linux box is running UTF-8 for all users: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LANGUAGE= LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= I don't know if the above "-E iso-8859-1:iso-8859-1" is the correct way to solve this, but now I know where to look. Forgive my impatience. Kind regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 22:19:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25250527 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F6936E for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.96.35.202] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XcLeY-0002Rb-Cu; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:53:42 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" , "Martin Hanson" Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible References: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:53:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.4/19490/Thu Oct 9 18:37:08 2014) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:19:58 -0000 On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:06:40 +0200, Martin Hanson wrote: > I have installed a box with FreeBSD 10.0 stable just to test and the > problem resides. > > I have also tried creating some new users on the Linux Samba box and > granting them access to the shares. Mounting using their credentials > with mount_smbfs creates the same problem. > > Using smbclient works. > > Mounting from a Linux box using "cifs-utils" ie. "mount -t cifs" also > works. > > I am beginning to suspect mount_smbfs. > > A directory containing a lot of files, all with the same credentials, > only about half shows up if mounted using a FreeBSD 10.0 or 10.1-RC1 > mount_smbfs no matter what user mounts. > But you can see more of these files when you use a GUI viewer, and with MC you can see all of them, if I read you right. Could this be charset related, i. e. do the files in question have any, like, utf-8 characters in their names? And MC decodes these filesnames correctly, your GUI viewer decodes some of them correctly, and the console doesn't do it at all? If it works better with a GUI then in the console, and the GUI accesses the smbfs mount, it is probably not the fault of mount_smbfs. Michael > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 22:53:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52E3EC30 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ECF967 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3jDSQ81rTqzlt for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:53:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:53:52 -0400 From: Daniel Staal Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:53:54 -0000 --As of October 8, 2014 9:28:05 PM -0700, Nick Sivo is alleged to have said: >> Not sure if this will be helpful, but at least it shouldn't hurt: When >> was the last time you ran a scrub? Also, how much RAM do you have and >> where is your swap? (The only times I've had permanent hangs from ZFS >> was when I ran out of RAM and was trying to swap to ZFS...) > > The server has 64GB ECC RAM, and no swap at the moment. I've since > rebooted the box, but a scrub today revealed no errors, and there was > nothing in the console or any log files about disk or controller > errors or timeouts. --As for the rest, it is mine. Note that I'm still just going by 'standard checks', but why don't you have any swap? I know you probably wouldn't use it with that much RAM around, but FreeBSD still performs better with it - and it wouldn't surprise me completely if that was causing your issue. (It shouldn't, in an ideal world - but it's an oddity on your system that might be causing issues, if there's an uncovered corner case.) Setting up a small ramdisk for swap - or even putting some small swap-on-zfs - might be worth checking to see if it seems to prevent the issue. (Note that swap-on-zfs has a 'worst case' scenario that crashes the box if you run out of RAM. It's happened to me, and I was able to recover, but it took a while.) Anyway, I'm mostly trying to keep your question alive in hopes that someone who's more knowledgeable can answer it. ;) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 9 23:17:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB39951 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943D5B7C for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id B76ECCB8CB1; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:17:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 76.192.184.214 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:17:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <56695.76.192.184.214.1412896622.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:17:02 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:17:09 -0000 On Thu, October 9, 2014 5:53 pm, Daniel Staal wrote: > --As of October 8, 2014 9:28:05 PM -0700, Nick Sivo is alleged to have > said: > >>> Not sure if this will be helpful, but at least it shouldn't hurt: When >>> was the last time you ran a scrub? Also, how much RAM do you have and >>> where is your swap? (The only times I've had permanent hangs from ZFS >>> was when I ran out of RAM and was trying to swap to ZFS...) >> >> The server has 64GB ECC RAM, and no swap at the moment. I've since >> rebooted the box, but a scrub today revealed no errors, and there was >> nothing in the console or any log files about disk or controller >> errors or timeouts. > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > Note that I'm still just going by 'standard checks', but why don't you > have > any swap? I know you probably wouldn't use it with that much RAM around, > but FreeBSD still performs better with it - and it wouldn't surprise me > completely if that was causing your issue. I'm petrified. Is that so? I mean, as I understood you, 64 GB RAM machine running under FreeBSD (say, 9.3) still needs some amount of SWAP for better performance, right? Valeri > (It shouldn't, in an ideal > world - but it's an oddity on your system that might be causing issues, if > there's an uncovered corner case.) > > Setting up a small ramdisk for swap - or even putting some small > swap-on-zfs - might be worth checking to see if it seems to prevent the > issue. (Note that swap-on-zfs has a 'worst case' scenario that crashes > the > box if you run out of RAM. It's happened to me, and I was able to > recover, > but it took a while.) > > Anyway, I'm mostly trying to keep your question alive in hopes that > someone > who's more knowledgeable can answer it. ;) > > Daniel T. Staal > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you > are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use > the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will > expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, > whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of > local copyright law. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 00:50:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E918A45 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78296E5 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3jDW0n5Fyfzmr for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:50:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:50:33 -0400 From: Daniel Staal Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Next Steps to Debug ZFS Hang? Message-ID: <000F985485834C2758CC492A@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: <56695.76.192.184.214.1412896622.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <1412732931033.813626ca@Nodemailer> <56695.76.192.184.214.1412896622.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:50:36 -0000 --As of October 9, 2014 6:17:02 PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev is alleged to have said: >> Note that I'm still just going by 'standard checks', but why don't you >> have >> any swap? I know you probably wouldn't use it with that much RAM around, >> but FreeBSD still performs better with it - and it wouldn't surprise me >> completely if that was causing your issue. > > I'm petrified. Is that so? I mean, as I understood you, 64 GB RAM machine > running under FreeBSD (say, 9.3) still needs some amount of SWAP for > better performance, right? --As for the rest, it is mine. Well, I suppose a better way to say it would be 'expects to have for normal operations'. Basically any modern OS expects to have some swap - even with abundant RAM. In theory you should be able to run without it, if you have the RAM, but it will be used (in small amounts) if it's available by normal housekeeping and operations. The tuning(7) man page under 9.3 recommends at least 256M of swap in all cases. (Though I note that recommendation is no longer in the man page under FreeBSD 10.) For a relatively new feature (like ZFS) that intensely and aggressively uses RAM (like ZFS), it would not surprise me if not having swap would uncover bugs in the implementation. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 02:08:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38905A6A for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F33DAA for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter25-d.gandi.net (mfilter25-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.153]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0741D172091 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:08:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter25-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter25-d.gandi.net (mfilter25-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U+S5U1377-ig for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:08:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.143 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (unknown [10.58.1.143]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 69F5F172089 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:08:41 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:38:41 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd 10 : cold-boot freeze Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Message-ID: <7580d6988dbce508b31f8142c12115d7@kathe.in> X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 02:08:46 -0000 hello, my newly purchased hp aio works well with freebsd 10.0, just that after a cold-boot, it just freezes during the boot-up process at the point shown in image at the following link. http://mayuresh.sdf.org/WP_20140926_001.jpg this is repeatable. i am more than willing to assist the freebsd team overcome this issue by way of providing as much of diagnostic information as required. best, ~mayuresh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 12:39:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4987DF for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF0E299 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-37.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9ACcxaq013758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:38:59 -0500 Message-ID: <5437D4DA.6070602@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:45:14 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: Re: FOLLOW-UP: Mounting samba, some files are invisible References: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <563081412888800@web23j.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:39:02 -0000 On 10/09/14 16:06, Martin Hanson wrote: > I have installed a box with FreeBSD 10.0 stable just to test and the problem resides. > > I have also tried creating some new users on the Linux Samba box and granting them access to the shares. Mounting using their credentials with mount_smbfs creates the same problem. > > Using smbclient works. > > Mounting from a Linux box using "cifs-utils" ie. "mount -t cifs" also works. > > I am beginning to suspect mount_smbfs. > > A directory containing a lot of files, all with the same credentials, only about half shows up if mounted using a FreeBSD 10.0 or 10.1-RC1 mount_smbfs no matter what user mounts. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hmmmm .... now that you mention it, I thought cifs superceded smbfs, i.e. you are supposed to be using cifs & *not* smbfs .... I should have caught that earlier, asleep at the switch .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 14:39:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F336B3D for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688A6187 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:39:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=68xBcSr33dKJKZyRmAUwrbwr8eRAqGvU8OCNYfi4SQo=; b=VmNAxNkp0lOL8T6sloFVnTNyVXbV7qzu0Q3hn2mEr7Ym7/jZzp2vgwzNI+iiRvSmJ3/QxRa8zeglCupYlavXpqWrYOz0ebgNmZv2V4hLbHgc46BDPnMqRTvYxnHD0Af2Sm8jCyLzi2GkZDG/5Fbkii6eDqRP8i/p2MvB502kGOE=; From: Daniel Corbe To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Freeing wired memory Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:29:20 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1bcPCuNRKm8y5Y.NA1TfqK4O X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:39:10 -0000 There's an application running on one of my hosts which has a memory leak in it. It ends up consuming a fair chunk of available RAM: Mem: 2312M Active, 69M Inact, 13G Wired, 39M Cache, 1684M Buf, 354M Free My understanding is Wired memory is memory that may not necessarily be in use but it is reserved for applications that either have at one point needed it or may need it in the future. I'll kill the app in another few days or so because calls to malloc() will begin to fail across the board. But my main problem right now is I usually have to reboot the box because killing the app and restarting it does NOT return any memory to the free pool. The step I'd like to avoid here is rebooting the box. So I'm obviously missing something. -Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 14:49:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFAB0F08 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x233.google.com (mail-vc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7173F288 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id im17so2768303vcb.10 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:49:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=E/PQDtgm0xGk99xbLmQfoNcRCV1etsDlILKOgUpTfDs=; b=Q+Kv7ZmhW5TziSDsEGCg6ZTLB2fiL0aNgeP4GRXO7hHx6U4m+ovkRDY5cRISmIotUx F2f4QNmsm5PQvi5RGCaLANX0XuDycgvwxncvVo0OPp+VvyhbrjmJA8/Vy66zrgqRSnUA ULWitZ/eNduZeIFppjNc33g1DxJ74HN8UgPrlGs9AStiG8+NEDCOxDyLZg3letYOms1g okvgLHsAWBqou+NngCholbznxxiGt6P9HEL48GzoCjAvB59RBOrpbkPKF2JE7EZWB1dB HvTdYuDLfCyDvRnQmuS8CsfKfyIH2xZg4AgAGyjrO4908jf2Rnl+aghYbcgqo/QkcWmE b73Q== X-Received: by 10.221.62.133 with SMTP id xa5mr2166586vcb.41.1412952564477; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:49:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.192.205 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:49:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anton Sayetsky Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:49:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Freeing wired memory To: Daniel Corbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:49:27 -0000 Wired memory = kernel memory 2014-10-10 17:29 GMT+03:00 Daniel Corbe : > > There's an application running on one of my hosts which has a memory > leak in it. It ends up consuming a fair chunk of available RAM: > > Mem: 2312M Active, 69M Inact, 13G Wired, 39M Cache, 1684M Buf, 354M Free > > My understanding is Wired memory is memory that may not necessarily be > in use but it is reserved for applications that either have at one point > needed it or may need it in the future. > > I'll kill the app in another few days or so because calls to malloc() > will begin to fail across the board. > > But my main problem right now is I usually have to reboot the box > because killing the app and restarting it does NOT return any memory to > the free pool. > > The step I'd like to avoid here is rebooting the box. > > So I'm obviously missing something. > > -Daniel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:14:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C1BB21 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C497F3 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-37.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9AFEras030645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: <5437F964.7000109@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:21:08 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeing wired memory References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:14:56 -0000 On 10/10/14 09:29, Daniel Corbe wrote: > There's an application running on one of my hosts which has a memory > leak in it. It ends up consuming a fair chunk of available RAM: > > Mem: 2312M Active, 69M Inact, 13G Wired, 39M Cache, 1684M Buf, 354M Free > > My understanding is Wired memory is memory that may not necessarily be > in use but it is reserved for applications that either have at one point > needed it or may need it in the future. > > I'll kill the app in another few days or so because calls to malloc() > will begin to fail across the board. > > But my main problem right now is I usually have to reboot the box > because killing the app and restarting it does NOT return any memory to > the free pool. > > The step I'd like to avoid here is rebooting the box. > > So I'm obviously missing something. > > -Daniel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > What CLI command (if any) did you use to get those memory stats ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:24:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD9DE4C for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B143D8E8 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-37.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9AFO52k004153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:24:05 -0500 Message-ID: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:30:19 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: sh man page .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:24:07 -0000 I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used for web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks (i.e. my daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts written to use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I use these scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, error under sh). The man page for sh doesn't reflect some of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, & is a bit short on its description of arithmetic evaluations in general. It would be sweet if it were updated to document more of the differences/similarities w/ bash, since there a clearly a decent number of similarities, & only a few (for me) differences. TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:30:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959B2F65 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BD194E for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a3so6788165oib.8 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A7hxoNz7ANyzHCOWLcYfSuLmjtTIdtfoQ0VvYOO4jrI=; b=fvum5TaZyq53nn5Kfna0VVg8uVySEi0BqyUfGmDRO8Kz5kDJ38axww6ri+XGtW2BKX 0j6Gh5oE7UMtSjO4Z0Q30Ln63KMT91Tb2WhXKsvLzsRgRFAN9i/WvLCQj+H9lZcw05HC tjcj+Aw6mMscz+kd3f/JNn3NRMRsSE8tnjdPB2wL/6L6K+kZvNNhCEJVr9HCg3F9eMc+ RJT4YCtkGyVxqY/ZV7kMagH08IiSp5poQ2BBHYvNHYKWZZOV8e+Dt3tj2a0NS3yUNmlu R6E72OXaROiS99Ni70HLWqMajTwdQtv3/oUw5xZKMr2rXjeih4DWlCIzOoTFPi6giFpR L6YA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZCZQRRThA6ZpE1H5ryZV8rGumdRpucgfftmZEJZs/gf7L+2tOFw9eblwM7N8SOpdQdpmg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.94.41 with SMTP id cz9mr2899269oeb.54.1412955033189; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:30:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sh man page .... From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:30:35 -0000 On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >.....I had a bunch of shell scripts written to use Linux > sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of the arithmetic > operators that traditional sh had. When I use these scripts under sh under > FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are some minor differences (empty > strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, error under sh). The man page for > sh doesn't reflect some of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, Nor should it. The Bourne Shell is the Bourne Shell, is adequately documented by the man page, and warnings about incompatibility are the responsibility of those who foist off bash as sh. You're blaming your own bad habit on others. :-) - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:35:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B7FE1 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5FAA10 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-37.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9AFZYZr016270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:35:35 -0500 Message-ID: <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:41:49 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:35:36 -0000 On 10/10/14 10:30, Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> .....I had a bunch of shell scripts written to use Linux >> sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of the arithmetic >> operators that traditional sh had. When I use these scripts under sh under >> FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are some minor differences (empty >> strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, error under sh). The man page for >> sh doesn't reflect some of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, > Nor should it. The Bourne Shell is the Bourne Shell, is adequately > documented by the man page, and warnings about incompatibility are the > responsibility of those who foist off bash as sh. > > You're blaming your own bad habit on others. :-) > > - M > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Well !!!! The sh man page is mute on the fact that an empty string is an error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, which is an omission irrespective of what bash does :-). I presume that converting Linux users to FBSD users is an agenda item here (maybe my error), thus suitably complete man pages should be an important goal, I would think. I didn't think converting from Linux to FBSD was/is a bad habit ;-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:38:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F261A0 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F94A3E for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id B9ACBCB8C9C; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.212 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <61956.128.135.70.212.1412955485.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:05 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: sh man page .... From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Michael Sierchio" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:38:07 -0000 On Fri, October 10, 2014 10:30 am, Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III > wrote: > >>.....I had a bunch of shell scripts written to use Linux >> sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of the >> arithmetic >> operators that traditional sh had. When I use these scripts under sh >> under >> FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are some minor differences >> (empty >> strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, error under sh). The man page >> for >> sh doesn't reflect some of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, > > Nor should it. The Bourne Shell is the Bourne Shell, is adequately > documented by the man page, and warnings about incompatibility are the > responsibility of those who foist off bash as sh. > > You're blaming your own bad habit on others. :-) > Let me second it. I recently re-discovered (yes, I knew it since long ago, just forgot) that Linuxes usually have "sh" as a symlink just pointing to bash. It kind of kicked me out of my chair: security wise (and in general) you shouldn't use large code (which bash is) to do just a small set of "features" (which sh is). It just reminded me that Linux started in general as a "hack" and still didn't fully grew out of it... Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 15:45:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4C92F5 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F65B1C for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-37.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9AFjaP0026251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:45:36 -0500 Message-ID: <54380097.9050501@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:51:51 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <61956.128.135.70.212.1412955485.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <61956.128.135.70.212.1412955485.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:45:38 -0000 On 10/10/14 10:38, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Fri, October 10, 2014 10:30 am, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III >> wrote: >> >>> .....I had a bunch of shell scripts written to use Linux >>> sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of the >>> arithmetic >>> operators that traditional sh had. When I use these scripts under sh >>> under >>> FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are some minor differences >>> (empty >>> strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, error under sh). The man page >>> for >>> sh doesn't reflect some of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, >> Nor should it. The Bourne Shell is the Bourne Shell, is adequately >> documented by the man page, and warnings about incompatibility are the >> responsibility of those who foist off bash as sh. >> >> You're blaming your own bad habit on others. :-) >> > Let me second it. > > I recently re-discovered (yes, I knew it since long ago, just forgot) that > Linuxes usually have "sh" as a symlink just pointing to bash. It kind of > kicked me out of my chair: security wise (and in general) you shouldn't > use large code (which bash is) to do just a small set of "features" (which > sh is). It just reminded me that Linux started in general as a "hack" and > still didn't fully grew out of it... > > Valeri > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I quite agree w/ the point of the small, sharp tool that sh is compared to bash, & I like it. Hence, when I bump into these minor incompatibilities that the sh man page is mute on (empty string is an error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, irrespective of bash behavior) when converting from bash to sh, I thought it would be apropos to flag that to the sh man page maintainer. I probably worded my OP badly, I was/am more focused on the rather terse (& incomplete, I think) man page, I just provided the background (conversion from FC14 to FBSD 9.3) as perspective on how the issue came up. Anyway, I hope the man page might be fleshed out a bit, that's all .... TIA & have a nice day :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 16:30:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36EC480 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FBB101 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7E12A60 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:30:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:30:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=Z7B5HHqO36/bpb7rUDLCYig8 R6Y=; b=E8xKLjELTPBQ8hXZIyEXumKVdv3wq2TeS4xhLKeHqi43xCer0bH8XnWG 3uVKJxi2WZMNLIr4mR1zSvhqeVtcT1cC0VuR6a8w4Y14lkcYOW1p2S2exaks1j3k k9BciiM47rl3lyXVGQtkyqGZIWDuuFlVOfUEajk0liIlXQZ11eU= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id A1D5968003A; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:30:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1412958636.2343973.177532689.62F117A8@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 5m23b1CZDH9CPc4rE19JCDp7MZWi2F/Cl0GHR+4Ppf07 1412958636 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7434a20c In-Reply-To: <5437F964.7000109@hiwaay.net> References: <5437F964.7000109@hiwaay.net> Subject: Re: Freeing wired memory Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:30:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:30:43 -0000 On Fri, Oct 10, 2014, at 10:21, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 10/10/14 09:29, Daniel Corbe wrote: > > There's an application running on one of my hosts which has a memory > > leak in it. It ends up consuming a fair chunk of available RAM: > > > > Mem: 2312M Active, 69M Inact, 13G Wired, 39M Cache, 1684M Buf, 354M Free > > > > My understanding is Wired memory is memory that may not necessarily be > > in use but it is reserved for applications that either have at one point > > needed it or may need it in the future. > > > > I'll kill the app in another few days or so because calls to malloc() > > will begin to fail across the board. > > > > But my main problem right now is I usually have to reboot the box > > because killing the app and restarting it does NOT return any memory to > > the free pool. > > > > The step I'd like to avoid here is rebooting the box. > > > > So I'm obviously missing something. > > > > -Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > What CLI command (if any) did you use to get those memory stats ? TIA > It's the fourth line in the output of top From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 17:02:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E18C8F for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aegir.dabus.com (aegir.dabus.com [173.14.229.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329F0623 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aegir.dabus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegir.dabus.com (Processor) with ESMTP id 190385F320 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:55:06 -0600 (MDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; b=elPzcuDvmRbAxa6RM9j5k3Ct9l/ynHKmzoeXwVLtjNUqFaTIAYobie1g9x0putCv++4T+ujLIVPDNS+asgZa/k//p90EMiCq90yUp8f2PDplmqdmYRSq9AqddUmArIajRQP4+KOT5HY8hSRvrLqJnGxOAKKeptRrvb9mt+WyKwc=; c=nofws; d=dabus.com; q=dns; s=aegir1 Received: from mizar.holyordnance.org (unknown [172.56.6.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aegir.dabus.com (Dabus) with ESMTPSA id 145B35F2B8 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:55:03 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:52:49 -0600 From: Eric S Pulley To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: sh man page .... Message-ID: <20141010105249.23b25ada@mizar.holyordnance.org> In-Reply-To: <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> Organization: Dabus X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:02:10 -0000 > > Well !!!! The sh man page is mute on the fact that an empty string is > an error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, which is an omission > irrespective of what bash does :-). I presume that converting Linux > users to FBSD users is an agenda item here (maybe my error), thus > suitably complete man pages should be an important goal, I would > think. I didn't think converting from Linux to FBSD was/is a bad > habit ;-) .... > > I'm confused, can you ever do arithmetic or logical evaluations on an empty string?... Why have an entry stating the obvious? If all man pages did is state the obvious there wouldn't be room for the important stuff. And then even less people would bother to read them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 17:38:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2B37B9 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00065A1B for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so2756305wib.15 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FBEGGT0qOR3tPWMyonXnRakSY1tYY3lpr9SMjvPGC0w=; b=Ph2OWuEmCBwz95+HKl21WQJHKIoTKVRud/qbackbvEuxxIM8IjbS8C1iaP0ZXXLgG4 5gufUOP/oPhs8/tvXFiED6YS7vinTH2D2hzXoHylsOZVjezgAfOTfqMW5DJxyORhdh1I FluCXqYFSjZJReBcM1XR4/pgwa7F1RwJ2L7VWnNUciGPjZfP+nNF516Ojmz/FxQC4FEM Wg1X22jyB3yrcdOsVQ0biQnTu4NytP2A4IKTfmKAMpJ60ceURzfav1LoLxSR/gNxLjIX +c4BHSLHGgESedO5SJZcNw2VShPv9xhkq6DkW/85WvQg9bPnIzhS7Mo/77v4fSObzlCg PiLw== X-Received: by 10.194.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr4575330wjz.98.1412962721182; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec1f671.skybroadband.com. [94.193.246.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ic4sm3302106wid.19.2014.10.10.10.38.14 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:38:14 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sh man page .... Message-ID: <20141010183814.3ae32a05@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:38:43 -0000 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:30:19 -0500 William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used > for web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks > (i.e. my daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts > written to use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a > superset of the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I > use these scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though > there are some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) > under bash, error under sh). Can you give an example? $ sh $ echo $((1+c)) 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 20:54:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CACCF for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8923B12E for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id q108so4416640qgd.23 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:54:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TOIsYSmX30t0K2Q072UFaic1kPlU18Ih26VyaBADjeQ=; b=lv8ke/EL4tnEJERt3P05TB3MNeC22u0Cu4Al6JViJQds28Q4DqO/thPkQW6wzL7hsQ Rs4S/UqCAOr0BUlx8BVsxo/APSEMziIjzWNq26Ec5oFZoPBNyayXV+8HJ1nJ25ePGW3k 8lHaDKu7UAR0nGeo9tnRUPfAtvZ66O+OMHL90kiwHAGnIGI0kIZByWa3sfPDBEUBoU/h CFWSpbtjChDDzmSWl5gOq4qyFmdEK7XQ3IiEe0sh2AlSX7kcnMCFCpiJ4pZWMfZNdGtD RrMd7dlncYFsVdS2l2+lMf1TEaPRepaqCzQHzkFwHrJnUQ93rwnklCLgdQm21z05c8vD 6qZw== X-Received: by 10.224.46.133 with SMTP id j5mr12534784qaf.92.1412974464695; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manutencao.portari.intra ([187.75.176.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm5940504qah.3.2014.10.10.13.54.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5438477D.7090406@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:54:21 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkRhbnRlIEYuIEIuIENvbMOyIg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freeBSD Subject: Samba smbd processes overload and panic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:54:25 -0000 Greetings everyone I recently deployed Samba 4.0.21 running as classic pdc on freebsd 10 version RELEASE-p9, most of shares are in a ZFS volume with vfs_zfsacl module, some smbd processes stays constantly with around 70% cpu usage sometimes 90% and dies with signal 11 according the log message , i also tried enable debug but didn't show anything helpful or maybe i wasn't able to understand the entire log, is there anybody here experiencing something similar ? Best Regards Dante F. B. Colò INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 59865 (4.0.21) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba HOWTO [2014/10/10 08:33:08.955295, 0] =============================================================== [2014/10/10 08:33:08.955326, 0] PANIC (pid 59865): internal error [2014/10/10 08:33:08.957939, 0] BACKTRACE: 7 stack frames: #0 0x802b5a921 at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 #1 0x802b5a708 at /usr/local/lib/libsmbconf.so.0 #2 0x80146ef25 at /usr/local/lib/libsamba-util.so.0 #3 0x80146f50a at /usr/local/lib/libsamba-util.so.0 #4 0x80146eee3 at /usr/local/lib/libsamba-util.so.0 #5 0x8044ce40b <_swapcontext+0x15b> at /lib/libthr.so.3 #6 0x8044cdff3 at /lib/libthr.so.3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 23:55:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408ED295 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94445F7 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9ANtYLl046045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s9ANtYBZ046042; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: sh man page .... In-Reply-To: <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:36 -0000 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Well !!!! The sh man page is mute on the fact that an empty string is an > error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, which is an omission irrespective > of what bash does :-). I presume that converting Linux users to FBSD users is > an agenda item here (maybe my error), thus suitably complete man pages should > be an important goal, I would think. I didn't think converting from Linux to > FBSD was/is a bad habit ;-) .... If there are things missing from sh(1), please enter a bug report. I can't guarantee whether it will be worked on soon, but it will be there and waiting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 00:03:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC405390 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777316D1 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-95.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9B03mm5023665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:03:48 -0500 Message-ID: <5438755B.2000108@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:10:03 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <20141010183814.3ae32a05@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20141010183814.3ae32a05@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:03:56 -0000 On 10/10/14 12:38, RW wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:30:19 -0500 > William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> >> I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used >> for web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks >> (i.e. my daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts >> written to use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a >> superset of the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I >> use these scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though >> there are some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) >> under bash, error under sh). > Can you give an example? > > $ sh > $ echo $((1+c)) > 1 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Straight out of the script which is failing. Under linux, if I call the script w/ no '-s #' option, the variable 'slept' is not set, & linux (or more accurately linux bash) evaluates that to the value oif zero (0). [wam@kabini1, ~, 7:07:22pm] 386 % sh $ if [ 0 -lt $(($slept)) ] ; then echo -n "$cmd: sleeping $slept secs ...." ; sleep $(($slept)) ; echo " done." ; fi arithmetic expression: expecting primary: "" [wam@kabini1, ~, 7:07:45pm] 387 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 00:12:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E441D4A2 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEFBA7F8 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-95.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9B0CEhJ026542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:12:14 -0500 Message-ID: <54387755.8020707@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:18:29 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> <20141010105249.23b25ada@mizar.holyordnance.org> In-Reply-To: <20141010105249.23b25ada@mizar.holyordnance.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:12:16 -0000 On 10/10/14 11:52, Eric S Pulley wrote: >> Well !!!! The sh man page is mute on the fact that an empty string is >> an error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, which is an omission >> irrespective of what bash does :-). I presume that converting Linux >> users to FBSD users is an agenda item here (maybe my error), thus >> suitably complete man pages should be an important goal, I would >> think. I didn't think converting from Linux to FBSD was/is a bad >> habit ;-) .... >> >> > I'm confused, can you ever do arithmetic or logical evaluations on an > empty string?... Why have an entry stating the obvious? If all man > pages did is state the obvious there wouldn't be room for the important > stuff. And then even less people would bother to read them. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > For better or worse, bash does exactly that (do arithmetic or logical evaluations on empty strings), evaluating the empty string to zero (0) .... I didn't write bash, but it is out there, widely used, & thus it is quite possible for someone to accidentally (my case) or otherwise run into &/or expect that behavior .... Given that, it doesn't seem at all out of line to expect that the sh man page might just mention that in passing. IIRC, my old SGI's sh man pages did mention that .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 05:35:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86F034C for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 05:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46BEB89A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 05:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s9B5Ym8O031892; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:34:49 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 16:34:48 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Mayuresh Kathe Subject: Re: freebsd 10 : cold-boot freeze In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20141011161809.K56328@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 05:35:00 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 540, Issue 5, Message: 19 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:38:41 +0530 Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > hello, > > my newly purchased hp aio works well with freebsd 10.0, just that after > a cold-boot, it just freezes during the boot-up process at the point > shown in image at the following link. > http://mayuresh.sdf.org/WP_20140926_001.jpg > > this is repeatable. > > i am more than willing to assist the freebsd team overcome this issue by > way of providing as much of diagnostic information as required. > > best, > > ~mayuresh Hi Mayuresh, I suggest posting this issue to freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org with a bit more information about your system (uname -a etc) .. perhaps after checking whether a recent 10.1-BETA CD or memstick boot still has this issue? Sounds like you don't have this problem on a warm boot? If that's so, providing a (link to a) full dmesg after a verbose boot should help, but people there will likely ask you for more specific details. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 13:27:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2854E2FA for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20196CF for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:27:07 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.54392FD3.0092, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=28/50, refid=2.7.2:2014.10.10.74220:17:28.394, ip=86.143.146.172, rules=__HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __IN_REP_TO, __HAS_X_MAILER, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __INT_PROD_COMP, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_1500_1599, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[172.146.143.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from elena.home (86.143.146.172) by rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as afmcc) id 5436E80D0037B2A4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:25:39 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1413034027; bh=//8eUkSqyXbvFz816aQuPUHUcFSITppYoIoQCYR03Dg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version; b=I5TeuhW+x1AfOZfJVN8s+N2MG/d23vSGwvfEC5sMp78PW1aIUYYvG8kCQFo16PAisBpYtxKfbih5F7eiaBUF32PGfcft+ySeCWCv/4azz/ZSQG+2AAUv9FrLtcQJDvMEw0ShEfDWNCpu+mY57R2moq1l9KfZ3ImTV9rZQ1PVl+g= Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:25:38 +0100 From: TonyMc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sh man page .... Message-ID: <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> In-Reply-To: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:27:08 -0000 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:30:19 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > > > I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used > for web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks > (i.e. my daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts > written to use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a > superset of the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I > use these scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though > there are some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) > under bash, error under sh). The man page for sh doesn't reflect some > of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, & is a bit short on its > description of arithmetic evaluations in general. It would be sweet > if it were updated to document more of the differences/similarities > w/ bash, since there a clearly a decent number of similarities, & > only a few (for me) differences. TIA .... > It seems to me you have this the wrong way around. /bin/sh is the Bourne shell, bash is sh-like, so surely it is the task of the bash maintainers to document incompatibilities with the Bourne shell? The "a" in bash is for "again", so it is clearly intended as a Bourne-shell inspired shell. The example you give of silently evaluating empty strings as numeric zero is exactly the sort of incompatibility that should be documented in the bash man page. But it is not the sh shell's problem, surely? Tony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 15:00:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75F569C for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B2E95 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-43.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.43]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s9BF0EDn025717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:00:15 -0500 Message-ID: <54394775.9020303@hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:06:29 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> In-Reply-To: <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:00:17 -0000 On 10/11/14 08:25, TonyMc wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:30:19 -0500 > "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > >> >> I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used >> for web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks >> (i.e. my daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts >> written to use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a >> superset of the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I >> use these scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though >> there are some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) >> under bash, error under sh). The man page for sh doesn't reflect some >> of these compatibilities/incompatibilities, & is a bit short on its >> description of arithmetic evaluations in general. It would be sweet >> if it were updated to document more of the differences/similarities >> w/ bash, since there a clearly a decent number of similarities, & >> only a few (for me) differences. TIA .... >> > It seems to me you have this the wrong way around. /bin/sh is the > Bourne shell, bash is sh-like, so surely it is the task of the bash > maintainers to document incompatibilities with the Bourne shell? The > "a" in bash is for "again", so it is clearly intended as a Bourne-shell > inspired shell. The example you give of silently evaluating empty > strings as numeric zero is exactly the sort of incompatibility that > should be documented in the bash man page. But it is not the sh > shell's problem, surely? > > Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Logically perfect :-). I am only whining about the 'oversight' (my word) since I came in the other direction (bash 1st, under Linux, followed by sh under FBSD). I am making the suggestion from a purely logistical POV, since bash is pretty widespread, & people coming to FBSD from Linux may bring their bash scripts & such w/ them. It is by no means *any* impugnment of FBSD, merely a suggestion for the convenience of a more complete man page (which other, older UNICES (SGI, Convex) had). I think FBSD sh does in fact accomodate some bash-ism's, and simply embellishing the arithmetic & logical evaluation sections, w/ no mention of bash, would probably be helpful to many. I obviously touched a nerve here ;-), my bad, but I think my point, if correctly worded, remains valid .... Who knows .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 17:36:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE37DFF for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com (mail-qc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8459913A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id c9so3375530qcz.36 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QamNZUT20zqHbVnyEXN3ipmSnPu1tUmpUqXjfhJ7YUY=; b=r6ltnvhBtupLhppWHEs6LfTtwp9Ssm5UURg3t37mMaruhLXXGMXQ6GA+0ThkjUB9QH +deM4GE37qsta3+6R0wjLeju2TQBkbjXdq38RZ0WRuQ0BapUIyKLHEpKtoc0FB+0K89e spwb1b53AFAEgf9bhCVgXZIXoGEoC9MGoGiYttw1hMAZKHfOENWjP7oZwPeJRX5io4dW fHn0Rsu6x4ZjdHhLlTMNRTbI63U9sYH0khW89x2rWYdewGeP5ZZuDOTp6ThzlVcWp1bd 1+b8c4nfbTSOdNYUWPpPlIrXnzexhWlRmPdrq1gsdHsMsJ01oMXNNeDldu9nS6jRooLx xv7Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.92.197 with SMTP id s5mr21194991qam.35.1413048998660; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.27.234 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:36:38 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? From: =?UTF-8?Q?fran=C3=A7ai_s?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:36:39 -0000 The following link explains the philosophy of OpenBSD and explains why the GPL is unacceptable according to this philosophy : http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 17:47:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF31FB6 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE95320C for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i138so9648490oig.23 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6TxoJ1Qj2V3NB/t3r8X50Nf4ExOHgCM3E814epSWnTc=; b=Tr7KMscHdLmNR5KcnQhlowjJmOAJxc3nqwzrXbGc+MnY9dxDp1S1Q0hx4sz5Kf1y5U xVZRY32VU0ZFJB0qTb3bPasaSEpgc/HIBlBy/nAhra3X6ZaufZp3cM6xWe2YjkPIxJT2 zTOmWo/BFmUXUYaGlZ5zZgijT+jG/mSU3V+yU/LxSsMD3WuNc81qtGcNXLWiaZo1Pi36 r/XJX8Is/OiecO+EW4UIC5Y08hMGgZHHJJM8/2w3kZR5nushgEkJDQaTuHtujaXNZuu2 VygHEa5WQc8VXckY++2kZQvaDB0yumnF/o5Gtkb5Dpc4qRHEoPFEq109MT2bUnRbuGQ9 dzXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxvPTQ79hON1wM9Q8E2sn8sUMFJC/JpLLcNsCSArefhiIhBTHWJ8TJyqccZ6n1PA163e4V MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.177.231 with SMTP id ct7mr11711798oec.8.1413049626730; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:47:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? From: Michael Sierchio To: =?UTF-8?Q?fran=C3=A7ai_s?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:47:14 -0000 On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:36 AM, fran=C3=A7ai s wro= te: > The following link explains the philosophy of OpenBSD and explains why th= e > GPL is unacceptable according to this philosophy : > http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html > > What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? Let the License Flame War begin! ;-) I agree that GPL is unacceptable, and my lawyers do, too. Since I am no longer a hobbyist but work for a company that makes software and sells services, GPL is toxic. My view is that Stallman is an intellectual fascist, but he's a MacArthur Grant recipient and I am not. Because FreeBSD arose out of the flames of a different license war (also a patent and trademark war), when BSD was extricated from AT&T, encumbering licenses are not favored. The two clause BSD license is Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Usually accompanied by a disclaimer and copyright claim. That license itself is the embodiment of the philosophy. - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 17:50:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679132FC for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BFBE23A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-30-92.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.30.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14913CEB4; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s9BHog9I002006; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:50:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:50:42 +0200 From: Polytropon To: TonyMc Subject: Re: sh man page .... Message-Id: <20141011195042.d33f5a95.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:50:52 -0000 On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:25:38 +0100, TonyMc wrote: > It seems to me you have this the wrong way around. /bin/sh is the > Bourne shell, [...] On FreeBSD, /bin/sh is not exactly the (original) Bourne shell, but the Almquist shell, also known as "ash". It implementss the standard features of the Bourne shell. > [...] bash is sh-like, so surely it is the task of the bash > maintainers to document incompatibilities with the Bourne shell? This is a valid opinion. The understanding of bash is "sh plus something more", so when the part "sh" differs from traditional sh implementations or standards, it should be mentioned. Among others, POSIX is such a set of requirements: if all of them are met, the shell can be called a "POSIX shell". > The > "a" in bash is for "again", so it is clearly intended as a Bourne-shell > inspired shell. Or "born again". :-) > The example you give of silently evaluating empty > strings as numeric zero is exactly the sort of incompatibility that > should be documented in the bash man page. But it is not the sh > shell's problem, surely? Things like "silently assuming or implying something" usually is not a good idea. Sometimes you intededly _want_ a numeric parameter to be differentiable between 0 (the value zero) or "" (empty string, not set), because it makes a difference in the program. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 17:56:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EC557A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C3A31A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9BHtvWS021479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:55:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s9BHtvWS021479 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s9BHtvWS021479; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54396F26.7010706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:55:50 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OE9n8Mn7ARSnOkDxjV3CsUJOtNi8Qi9ep" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:56:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OE9n8Mn7ARSnOkDxjV3CsUJOtNi8Qi9ep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/10/2014 18:36, fran=C3=A7ai s wrote: > The following link explains the philosophy of OpenBSD and explains why = the > GPL is unacceptable according to this philosophy : > http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html >=20 > What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? On the whole: pragmatic. Most of the FreeBSD source code uses the FreeBSD license (no surprise there), but the project is happy to use code licensed under similar terms -- like the MIT or ISC licenses. Ultimately the aim is to have the whole system licensed under such terms.= However, where there is a compelling reason, and where it does not impose restrictive terms on the entire FreeBSD project, we are prepared to use GPLv2 or earlier code. Not GPLv3 though -- the onerous, viral terms there immediately rule it right out. This is why the system compiler stuck at gcc-4.2 for a long time, and is now being replaced by clang. We're also happy to import CDDL code (read: ZFS) which could not be used with recent GPL versions. Eventually we'll have a completely GPL free system. It's mostly useful now with the GPL'd bits omitted, and many embedded software and other companies are currently using it like that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --OE9n8Mn7ARSnOkDxjV3CsUJOtNi8Qi9ep Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUOW8sXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT218P/RWwnfQHUz88wxcLE1G1aZll pa0yPAIPyk3ixI1fEW5s0tipV9AY26hqxGM7Hs0W4pQQWOApZR6dY2jpPNAsiIDv IkNMl0HEvlk+Gq/yuJfDNoARBx3Y1+3kKd/PyHZb78SgEG1GkX42CPE2piim2W5X 3OYqt7HdVeZoiOduYiZwXmPjI7iHpPCaLSuXKWy/zxbacv9LWp7an3OkIAQAE0tx xjvjEQJbJ6TZqmFY/TDHEklRRCSoNkWbKJxV5v0q9NZHUAXB32mjF5FKkdMa+ODa O/IZ2hFSZxrqUioy4lE/RTIKq2Kic/h5hVv4GeuRzUW/jBLcMyS2BqCD3fk5e7Xy D/IpuYGunOT5iD5y48zkyWOAowcP2wkzDv22hylKo+LAx2Lo26yPAEu//k02FBpF CbvlcWtA0FTEazY088P2/eSmBZrcAxAJWb4PWo1St/ym1KgNVDoyNgxbWqqzo8eO 2NGaYU0yCKntc+lp1AeWW2yzY4ls+N3JExGCsb2MsJKcTutzMi5V7Dz5jRQXpYVM uNxXD1q87PegE9xHdAXgyIJCtQ+vUzeLGO9+jYI1nan5inFExzAz8cIvJr5Xj2Os /PToAWmDCxE+H3fP08fo0QQThYPjP7Dg9xJMJET0TuiPEKMbGinaZdMQE++gFY2d KG72U0UUbDxae3BojS6/ =0ZzA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OE9n8Mn7ARSnOkDxjV3CsUJOtNi8Qi9ep-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 18:35:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668A946C for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DFE914 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9BIZRSE029311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:35:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s9BIZR5A029308; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:35:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:35:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: sh man page .... In-Reply-To: <54394775.9020303@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <20141011142538.45c9f45a@elena.home> <54394775.9020303@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:35:28 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:35:30 -0000 On Sat, 11 Oct 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I am only whining about the 'oversight' (my word) > since I came in the other direction (bash 1st, under Linux, followed by sh > under FBSD). I am making the suggestion from a purely logistical POV, since > bash is pretty widespread, & people coming to FBSD from Linux may bring their > bash scripts & such w/ them. This is entirely reasonable. We have programs that accept different options for Linux compatibility like find(1). I'm pretty certain that we have man pages that document differences between native FreeBSD programs and others. The documentation is there to help the user. Documenting differences and incompatibilities certainly falls into that category, particularly for the confusion surrounding a real sh(1) versus bash pretending to be sh. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 19:08:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A52A5A6 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD45BEE for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ft15so3481763pdb.30 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:08:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=nA5S6X4H86WJJQXVeYQ2JVP2WLbWmXzx//XROonOBLY=; b=FjweAGu98CWECgYP4o9Mkut23cUdEWujByN+x0KG3XO3QiKsmNn7cftiHcRDYqNxQA QNRVKXV39RpbY2axG6DJ9YZYrjiuurn3aoFPzFguwy80b82F+9fuBrMEkUPmnPZfhxMv /ImmyudfIDQ/e2S0mKXJEjuuKyu+2vTIXaxtran2G0R+7uf+NBufKk3dBBwTz316VkT+ 15ZIEoekMDCT7MrHHtufEjga0zODQRdotJ8pKRcVn2n+VDlZAOZ2JO8GkYmrNTvPw5lL wbCHnFfuBaFb5M53K2Xvu23NbQEpl1TKor/BhRrYxQ4btb0q5pY3n6WzphUpaL+hNOBo 0N9w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkF8croZBJ3oAQFJz4g1wcEOppZkjYnMRMAyE108P+Z3i4m2rMuRht92YH8VxTTyUVBJENR X-Received: by 10.66.65.110 with SMTP id w14mr3045659pas.130.1413054481805; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.mso ([36.46.209.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm6792601pdr.50.2014.10.11.12.07.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 12:08:00 -0700 (PDT) From: alphachi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: About GELI root Message-Id: <634BC660-A4FE-4F05-B7D0-8B93D1AF17A6@mediaspirit.org> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 03:07:53 +0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:08:09 -0000 Environment: FreeBSD 10.0R amd64 The root partition is /dev/ada0p1 with gpart label /dev/gpt/rootfs. = /dev/gpt/rootfs.eli is created from /dev/gpt/rootfs, not /dev/ada0p1. # cat /boot/loader.conf vfs.root.mountfrom=3D"ufs:/dev/gpt/rootfs.eli" aesni_load=3D"YES" geom_eli_load=3D"YES" geli_gpt_rootfs_keyfile0_load=3D"YES" geli_gpt_rootfs_keyfile0_type=3D"gpt/rootfs:geli_keyfile0" geli_gpt_rootfs_keyfile0_name=3D"/boot/rootfskey" Question 1. Boot is OK, but many messages like the under can be found in dmesg: ... GEOM_ELI: Found no key files in loader.conf for ad4p1 ... GEOM_ELI: Found no key files in loader.conf for gptid/* ... After adding "kern.cam.ada.legacy_aliases=3D0" to /boot/loader.conf, the = left messages are: GEOM_ELI: Found no key files in loader.conf for ada0p1 GEOM_ELI: Found no key files in loader.conf for gptid/* How to: disable the two messages except to change gpt_rootfs and = gpt/rootfs to ada0p1 in /boot/loader.conf? Question 2 I want to use the two different authentication for the root partition. = The first(geli setkey -n 0) is a key without passphrase. The partition = can be automounted with it. The second(geli setkey -n 1) is a passphrase = without key. The partition can be mounted manually with it on the other = computers. Before I add the second, the partition can be automounted. After adding = it, I have to input the passphrase at booting. It looks like the system = mix the two authentication, instead of independence. Perhaps because of = "geli init -b"? How to: if the key is found, the autobooting is OK; if the key isn't = found, the booting continue after inputting the passphrase? Thanks!= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 19:19:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359EB917 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC51CC8 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9BIum9i065801 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:56:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:56:48 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pkg upgrade question Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:56:48 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:19:13 -0000 I am trying to upgrade pidgin to see if that will help with facebook. pkg info -x pidgin pidgin-2.10.7_1 -- pkg version -v | grep pidgin pidgin-2.10.7_1 < needs updating (index has 2.10.9_4) -- pkg upgrade -x pidgin Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. pkg: pidgin-skype has a missing dependency: skype pkg: No packages available to upgrade matching 'pidgin' have been found in the repositories -- pkg search -x pidgin-2 e17-module-everything-pidgin-20130510_1 pidgin-2.10.9_4 I assume this makes sense, just not to me :) Oh and ... pkg info -g pkg pkg-1.3.8_3 Name : pkg Version : 1.3.8_3 Installed on : Sat Oct 11 14:21:33 EDT 2014 Origin : ports-mgmt/pkg Architecture : freebsd:9:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : ports-mgmt Licenses : BSD2CLAUSE Maintainer : portmgr@FreeBSD.org WWW : http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng Comment : Package manager Shared Libs provided: libpkg.so.3 Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD Flat size : 8.17MiB Description : Package management tool WWW: http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 20:08:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D35C1D for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11621BB for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h136so9842700oig.5 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8bBUJ+mlZXZU/cwCwz3ElxPpj9MLjSYWN5fs6mB4N2U=; b=V7hI1wQkvyJralgO7h3Lt/VWBvC9DVwK4Bkua+W2SkfUi+GJNmTNbmR9uT3gWh7AaR VagDw69JMJni3Wr4KHyykySPJDELJoOh/yK53RSYxzK9EzWpqHqk649CSQ81VednFxv6 93kyNpLPV41yEAyNYu+GEFHN4Z2syr8qrasc8Jo+N9iMb10PR6bwuBPpLLHD3RmHJy60 2xF5noXpGk3ynrm77Qp3P+F+kECTKvjQJ3z+7ur4VkM2TcFRBeS+XOUwSo7NRWIw8H/4 lxX3uyG082lI8MT6gGYePaX1dlQJRprENwQpfUQ2ZfonTVfblFCuQzPRFsb2a1wAwvrK H6SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkMoJ1kIo2nG5D0kPbD7Cf9fPSOoS1xuTItx3Vh4qj/yB+Gkip0VV9Xu8cSgD1PSob7N1bu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.165.138 with SMTP id yy10mr11882260obb.5.1413058089414; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54396F26.7010706@FreeBSD.org> References: <54396F26.7010706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:08:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:08:10 -0000 On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Seaman wrot= e: > On 11/10/2014 18:36, fran=C3=A7ai s wrote: >> What is the philosophy of FreeBSD about the licenses? > > On the whole: pragmatic. Most of the FreeBSD source code uses the > FreeBSD license (no surprise there), but the project is happy to use > code licensed under similar terms -- like the MIT or ISC licenses. > Ultimately the aim is to have the whole system licensed under such terms. Matthew's comments are sufficient, but I will note that it's easier for an individual (Theo) to speak authoritatively on behalf of OpenBSD than it is for someone to do so on behalf of FreeBSD. It's a much more collaborative project. And it's not necessary to have a position statement, because the goals are clearly embodied in the roadmap. GPLv3 has the paradoxical effect of offering a lucid, cogent reason to get rid of all GPL'd software. - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 21:08:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E96B86 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 21:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9469E90A for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 21:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi2so6713174wib.3 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CJHhbzdVwmIVUo5fNgWimVJ+MUJ8YhpaXu38PPMKMhI=; b=KHs6d6e2n9lGzvo2L35x7AgNzeY9MhPX52kkI1K2dHggkMtyZn0Nd7qvFCR+lFZz6U 2eYLzj0QLPHiMAlRhY3vot/yfSjjTYK0y1gNtwAUp8Dx0hm6tooft0/B+fGnNIMQfLCT gQOEAjlURVH37ajOcs2UiYoIsqlqjBn/0tJynEiw+fvK6LX/gCuo4Aqd4VvMVPQYvjDx DRenqkPGLJNHA2iiQquWnfXorJGUVNXG/a3vfMjPIturIZ8OmohnocLETXIqUGoFtL4k aK8erJJAjM4TfDd+nl1cuNBDUeWohyGgpXtUegx4sn3Kr7bWv0zCUKF2M7dZrZrUmDKK 727w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.104.8 with SMTP id ga8mr11880514wib.26.1413061693783; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.106.136 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:08:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20141011161809.K56328@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20141011161809.K56328@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:08:13 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uqKOa_Ye5PtCal1oYnjg7c3eki4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd 10 : cold-boot freeze From: Adrian Chadd To: Ian Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Mayuresh Kathe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 21:08:16 -0000 Yes, please try 10.1. I think this was fixed a while ago. Thanks! -a On 10 October 2014 22:34, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 540, Issue 5, Message: 19 > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:38:41 +0530 Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > hello, > > > > my newly purchased hp aio works well with freebsd 10.0, just that after > > a cold-boot, it just freezes during the boot-up process at the point > > shown in image at the following link. > > http://mayuresh.sdf.org/WP_20140926_001.jpg > > > > this is repeatable. > > > > i am more than willing to assist the freebsd team overcome this issue by > > way of providing as much of diagnostic information as required. > > > > best, > > > > ~mayuresh > > Hi Mayuresh, > > I suggest posting this issue to freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org with a bit more > information about your system (uname -a etc) .. perhaps after checking > whether a recent 10.1-BETA CD or memstick boot still has this issue? > > Sounds like you don't have this problem on a warm boot? If that's so, > providing a (link to a) full dmesg after a verbose boot should help, but > people there will likely ask you for more specific details. > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 23:55:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26B84AD for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811F8999 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A699F1464D; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:48:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5439C1D0.6030902@cyberleo.net> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:48:32 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: sh man page .... References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:55:23 -0000 On 10/10/2014 10:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > I have a FBSD 9.3 desktop that supplanted a Linux FC14 desktop used for > web access, some light development, & other day-to-day tasks (i.e. my > daily driver, so to speak). I had a bunch of shell scripts written to > use Linux sh, which was in fact bash, which means it had a superset of > the arithmetic operators that traditional sh had. When I use these > scripts under sh under FBSD 9.3, they largely work, though there are > some minor differences (empty strings evaluate to zero (0) under bash, > error under sh). The man page for sh doesn't reflect some of these > compatibilities/incompatibilities, & is a bit short on its description > of arithmetic evaluations in general. It would be sweet if it were > updated to document more of the differences/similarities w/ bash, since > there a clearly a decent number of similarities, & only a few (for me) > differences. TIA .... Try running devel/checkbashisms against the scripts. It's something Debian uses to ease migration from Bash to Dash in their base system, and I've found it rather useful to ensure no bashisms sneak into my own portable scripts. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/