From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:46:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA3C106566B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155B78FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so195440wer.13 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:46:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mArFY0Y+sshrc1sVaaB8k4To9EgnMXGDzdf4YNCpIMo=; b=o1KmJ4l/OH5vD317BaYcKcz8P0+PsQt22/2OV1qby+hSAA8XXpcri5rT7xtWQXf6VD CEAW7igEHB50wejrqsiXoyU+Px/PDaMT3/PAWnw7m1iyu4Md80FIOb1Odc6up1gmnORX /vXJoVqSvar26uvgJR8iM0gb/nbmq0/H1S2e4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.5 with SMTP id r5mr8369134wei.39.1329241582857; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.158.143 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:46:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120214122912.0febe249@scorpio> References: <4F38EFE0.7090602@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20120214122912.0febe249@scorpio> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:46:22 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: print/ghostscript9: ./base/sjpx_openjpeg.c:169: error: too many arguments to function X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:46:24 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:33:07 +0000 > Chris Rees articulated: > >> This has already been discussed on ports@, please don't cross-post. > > The problem has not been rectified as of yet. There is an open PR 165093 > filed against the port. I updated my ports tree about 7 hours ago and the fix was there. I've now built the new port on two systems (one amd64 and one i386) and had no problems. Looking at the repo, it appears the fix was made yesterday (2/13) at 21:48 and the Makefile should be CVS version 1.11. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com