Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 00:00:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: newfs: useless/bogus check if new last block can be accessed? Message-ID: <20030510235436.S616@korben.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <20030510155318.A40429@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030509223931.A75707@FreeBSD.org> <200305101409.aa30329@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20030510155318.A40429@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 May 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > * Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> [ Date: 2003-05-10 ] > > > What is using libufs's bwrite()? Would it be better to just make > > errors fatal for now so that a useful diagnostic can be printed? > > Everything using libufs*. That means every fs tool A quick grep showed badsect, dumpfs, newfs and tunefs use libufs - of course, as you already mentioned, dumpfs doesn't do writes. > except for the growfs and related tools, which I seem to recall rely on > a lot of voodoo. BTW, growfs needs some fixes, too (bin/51138). > clri does in my tree, but I don't know if I ever merged it back in. No, clri ist currently not on the list. > But really you want something like ufserr() from other libufs > consumers, except without lossage of errno (some or all may do > this, I forget). You mean ufserr() as currently in dumpfs? regards, le --=20 Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX-Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID) Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 der Universit=E4t Wien http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030510235436.S616>