Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:27:03 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c Message-ID: <200411011427.03540.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041101123140.GB86304@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <200410290824.i9T8Oflr047896@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041030014408.GA17500@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20041101123140.GB86304@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 01 November 2004 07:31 am, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:44:08PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > Ok, last try at a compromise. If I commit the fix to todo > > [...] > > If J. Random committer fixes something on the ToDo list, and gets re@ > approval to merge it back to the appropriate branch, why isn't J. Random > committer updating the ToDo list at the same time? > > Seems to me if you've gone to all the trouble of fixing an item on the > ToDo list it's only fair that you get to be the one that gets to remove > it from there too. re@ decided to manage the todo list itself as people were adding items to the todo list without asking re@ if they were really show stoppers first, etc. Perhaps re@'s "managing" of the todo list can use some more refinement. Having it be a static webpage is actually not always intuitive, would be nice if it was in some kind of tracking system instead (along with all the merge requests). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411011427.03540.jhb>