From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 26 22:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B835016A403 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Hirsch@hirsch.it) Received: from server1.hirsch.it (server1.hirsch.it [213.239.214.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01A643DBA for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from M.Hirsch@hirsch.it) Received: from hsi-kbw-085-216-025-126.hsi.kabelbw.de ([85.216.25.126] helo=[192.168.101.121]) by server1.hirsch.it with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1FuzeG-00078I-8s; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: <44A060C3.8090008@hirsch.it> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:33:39 +0200 From: "M.Hirsch" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wilko Bulte References: <000001c6996c$3eab9df0$ad0d510a@toshi> <44A05B77.1030200@gmx.de> <20060626221804.GA94278@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060626221804.GA94278@freebie.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server1.hirsch.it", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wilko Bulte schrieb: >You really have never seen a machine used for serious business apparantly. > > > Depends on what you define "serious business"... Yes, I am rather new to FreeBSD (2y+) I am just trying to setup a /stable/ cluster of six machines right now. For over a week straight. 4.11 works perfectly. But support is going to be dropped very soon, so that's a bad option for me right now. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:34:41 -0000 Wilko Bulte schrieb: >You really have never seen a machine used for serious business apparantly. > > > Depends on what you define "serious business"... Yes, I am rather new to FreeBSD (2y+) I am just trying to setup a /stable/ cluster of six machines right now. For over a week straight. 4.11 works perfectly. But support is going to be dropped very soon, so that's a bad option for me right now. Over all, the system is /only/ supposed to handle a few hundred hits per second. (but including dynamic stuff like php...) Dunno if that (or what else) is "serious business" for you. Which version would you suggest for "serious business"? Anyways, my point stands: I rather have any of my nodes panic than carrying the risk of creating invalid data... One in a billion can be high probability, soon... (just planning for the future...) >panics like that should be eradicated, adding more nonsensical panics >is not what we need. > > uh, I would not call hardware failure "nonsensical panics". I guess I must have misunderstood you... M.