From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 10 10:26:47 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id KAA28688 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 10:26:47 -0800 Received: from estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.42.147]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA28681 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 10:26:46 -0800 Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA28513; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 10:25:37 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199502101825.KAA28513@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: suggestion? (slattach) To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 10:25:37 -0800 (PST) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, ctodish@levelone.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199502101555.IAA15681@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 10, 95 08:55:49 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 836 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > Does someone have a suggestion about modifing slattach.c so it > > >releases the com port when carrier drops? Right now it won't let my dialer > > >execute when carrier drops. > > > > For which versions of FreeBSD and slattach? In 1.1.5, slattach didn't > > do enough to release the controlling terminal, so its own redial command > > didn't work. > > Umm, I've got a 1.1.5 machine running slattach and the whole redial > system is working great. Slattach notices when the carrier drops and > runs my redail script with no problems. > > > Nate It doesn't work with expect though. 1.1.5's slattach did. -- Justin T. Gibbs ============================================== TCS Instructional Group - Programmer/Analyst 1 Cory | Po | Danube | Volga | Parker | Torus ==============================================