Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:24:01 -0800 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> Cc: "xen@freebsd.org" <xen@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PV i386 patch Message-ID: <1325028241.17645.10.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4EFA0313.6030105@rice.edu> References: <4EEB9CCE.6090701@rice.edu> <1324169806.3093.3.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EED4982.3080208@freebsd.org> <1324339762.3093.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF04F3C.9010309@rice.edu> <1324387685.3093.28.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF0D8D7.2060503@rice.edu> <4EF0EC1A.4010604@freebsd.org> <1324412718.12783.10.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EF245D1.2050503@rice.edu> <1324679157.17645.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4EFA0313.6030105@rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:40 -0800, Alan Cox wrote: > On 12/23/2011 16:25, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 12:47 -0800, Alan Cox wrote: > >> Can you please try the attached patch? I'm trying to reduce the number > >> of differences between the native and Xen pmap implementations. > >> > >> Alan > >> > > > > Without really looking at the output, I note that this didn't apply > > cleanly against -head ... can you regenerate it? > > > > My bad. I gave you the wrong patch. Try this instead. > > Alan > Initial testing looks ok from here. Single CPU PV DomU is up and running as ref10-xen32.f.o if you want to poke around at all. I'm updating the HVM enabled ref10-xen64.f.o as well to check it out. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1325028241.17645.10.camel>