From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 18 9: 2:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB3437B422 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA05019; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:02:32 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <200009181602.UAA05019@aaz.links.ru> Subject: Re: Port Maintainers In-Reply-To: <002d01c0210a$beca4350$1200a8c0@zircon> from "Matthew Emmerton" at "Sep 17, 0 08:52:39 pm" To: matt@gsicomp.on.ca (Matthew Emmerton) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:02:32 +0400 (MSD) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Emmerton writes: ........ > What I'm wondering if is there is any mechanism in place to ensure that the > support channel (e-mail to the port maintainer) remains open and valid. I > know that at least one port for which the maintainer's email address bounces > mail. There may also be some ports for which the designated maintainers > simply don't maintain the port anymore. It would be advantageous to all if > a periodic validation of these contact points could be performed (once per > RELEASE would seem like a logical period to me.) It is reasonable -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message